February 14, 2005
A YEAR
365 days
215 letters
98 IMs
18 phone calls
2 halves of a broken heart
2-3 weeks until I see this smiling face again.
We're almost there, husband.
2 squeezes
Posted by: Sarah at
02:44 AM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 34 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Contrary to my advice, you are counting down. Oh well. The day will still come regardless!
Posted by: Mike at February 14, 2005 07:30 AM (cyYKH)
2
I'm not really counting down...only looking forward to March coming in like a husband!
Posted by: Sarah at February 14, 2005 07:48 AM (JcYXc)
3
Good for you--both of you!
Posted by: Mike at February 14, 2005 06:33 PM (FP9A9)
4
I'm happy for you!
Happy Valentine's Day :-)
Posted by: Agnieszka O. at February 14, 2005 08:24 PM (MUNUu)
5
Hey what a great picture! Happy Valentine's Day you two!
Posted by: annika at February 15, 2005 12:04 AM (7hunc)
6
My son-in-law is a pretty handsome guy, isn't he? He's smart too! You all are a match made in heaven! Happy Valentine's Day to both of you.
Love, Mama
Posted by: Nancy at February 15, 2005 01:22 AM (YuW6k)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
February 13, 2005
HMM
Random thought: I still don't understand how the Trojans fell for that stupid horse.
Posted by: Sarah at
04:36 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 16 words, total size 1 kb.
1
For the same reason that half the world went crazy over beanie babies a few years ago and Paris Hilton still has a TV show on and Dems still think they were robbed in Nov. and ......... People are stupid.
Posted by: Pamela at February 14, 2005 01:56 PM (PlwSw)
2
Actually from what I understand the horse was suppose to represent Poseidan. Who is the god of Earthquakes and as we all know that area has had a lot of earthquakes
Posted by: Dave at February 14, 2005 07:25 PM (9egRp)
3
While trying for a quick grin, I got slapped down by a serious scholar! sigh
Posted by: Pamela at February 16, 2005 04:01 PM (PlwSw)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
MACDO
Amritas mentions the French nickname for McDonald's:
MacDo. Once when I was in France, my friends and I were walking to the McDonald's, laughing and talking to each other in the parking lot. A man pushing a baby stroller passed us and began yelling at us to speak French or go home. "This is France, we speak French here!" We were dumbfounded, and as he walked away, we noted how ironic it was that he had just walked out of the biggest symbol of American soft power -- where he had likely uttered the words
un Big Mac et un Sprite s'il vous plait -- and he had the nerve to tell us not to speak English. Can you imagine that same scenario in the US: going to a Mexican restaurant and yelling at patrons not to speak Spanish?
Ahh, the French.
Posted by: Sarah at
04:30 AM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 144 words, total size 1 kb.
1
MacDonald's? Non, non! C'est ne pas francais! Je voudrais une Whopper avec la works!
Posted by: Francis W. Porretto at February 13, 2005 08:03 AM (MzH7h)
2
Ahh, the ever tolerant and open-minded French. How we all aspire to the standards they've set...
Posted by: James at February 13, 2005 04:38 PM (fmHaY)
3
Hopefully you told "Jean Claude" or whatever his name was to be thqankful for the freedom your husbands predacessors provided and please shut the F up.
Posted by: cptham at February 14, 2005 02:11 PM (NMK3S)
4
With a name like McDonald's, shouldn't everybody be speaking Gaelic there?
Posted by: annika at February 14, 2005 03:55 PM (zAOEU)
5
Should have told him that if wasn't for the English speaking he'd be speaking German.
By the way, did anyone ever tell the guys manning the Maginot Line that the Germans went in by the side door.
Posted by: David at February 14, 2005 04:53 PM (lvRBT)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
February 12, 2005
CAN OF WORMS
I said last week that our Rear D is doing a stellar job. Well, I just hit a stupid snag that opened up a whole can of worms.
I have Red 6's car. And his car keys, house keys, and cell phone. I check on his apartment, I get his mail, I help arrange his vacation plans, and I even have made hotel reservations for one of his soldiers. Whatever, I'm a helpful girl. But I realized at the FRG meeting that I need to be notified when he arrives in Germany because he won't be able to tell me himself. Each wife gets a call roughly six hours before her husband gets home, but we only get notified when our husbands arrive, not when other planes of our battalion's soldiers get in. So I asked to get a phone call when Red 6 arrives, so I can welcome him home, give him his car, and let him into his house.
And I got a nasty look like I was arranging something lewd.
Look, I know there are some skanky men and women around here, but I'm not doing anything gross, and it kinda stung that that was the immediate reaction I got. Especially when the Rear D already knows that I have Red 6's car because I had to pick up his registration from them last spring. After the initial condescending look and hesitation, I reminded them that Red 6 has no way of getting home or getting into his house unless I am there for him, and they agreed to call me. I was a little taken aback, but whatever.
I mentioned this story to my husband yesterday, just as a "check out what happened to me" sort of deal, and he went ballistic. My husband is not a ballistic sort of person. He got so mad that Red 6's company was treating me bad when I was doing so much for their own soldiers, and he said he was going to do something about it. Oh crap.
So I got a message from Red 6 today that he had talked to the husband and was mad too, that he had talked to the First Sergeant and told him to ream the FRL, etc, etc, etc. So now I've gotten someone in trouble when that wasn't my intention at all. Sure, I was a little peeved that someone insinuated that I was being a whore, but that's not the first time our close relationship with Red 6 has brought me that sort of treatment. He's my husband's best friend. That makes him my best friend. And if you think I'm gonna have an affair with someone who thinks chugging tobasco is a smart move, you're off your rocker.
The sad thing is that our most recent battalion newsletter called for "designated huggers", for wives to volunteer to come to the ceremonies and welcome home single soldiers, not just their own husbands. I thought it was a great idea, and one darling wife had a t-shirt made that says Designated Hugger. But if the Rear D is going to treat us like hookers when we ask to be informed of single soldiers' arrivals, then what's the point of asking for huggers? It makes no sense to me. Either they trust us to show our soldiers respect and admiration, or they ask us not to come. But don't ask us to be huggers and then smirk at us when we roger that.
I help Red 6 and his soldiers because I want to show all soldiers that I love and appreciate them. They all deserve to have someone there to pick them up and buy them a beer. I hate that I got leered at when I asked to do our best friend a favor, but I also hate that I got someone in trouble, because I don't want to look like the officer's wife went and complained she was being treated badly. Ugh.
Posted by: Sarah at
11:06 AM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
Post contains 670 words, total size 4 kb.
1
I, for one, would like to thank you profoundly for supporting the troops. As a former soldier, I know what it means to have that kind of support. It's a wonderful thing.
When I read this, it put me in mind of something that happened to me at Ft. Bliss. I was attached to a training brigade there for a short time and was having some trouble with the higher-ups in command. I won't go into the details, but the situation made my wife so mad that she took it upon herself to call the
Secretary of the Army! And she actually got to speak with him! You can only imagine the look on my First Seargent's face when I had to tell him to be expecting a call the next morning. Not fun.
Posted by: Drew at February 12, 2005 11:21 AM (zEdFo)
2
Don't hate that you might have gotten someone in trouble. Small minds like to assume that their 'moral superiority' gives them the right to question and 'spin' a perfectly innocent and legitimate request like yours. To say nothing of the fact that it's none 'o their damn business as to why you're asking to be notified. But I guess in the future, RED6 should probably clear all his personal arraignments thru the FRL so as not to cause them any discomfort as to what they think they know. I've served as a Family Readiness SNCO for a deployed unit and there is no excuse for the treatment that you've described. NONE-period.
Posted by: Top_S__USMC at February 12, 2005 12:47 PM (J7FBQ)
3
Perhaps you’re being too sensitive. After all, you did state: “I'm doing anything gross.” (Ha!)
Posted by: Bob at February 12, 2005 01:13 PM (Xbhpv)
4
Heh. Freudian slip fixed
Posted by: Sarah at February 12, 2005 09:57 PM (ZpuzV)
5
Sarah - you have a right to be angry about that type of treatment. Just remember - people project on you what they think of themselves...
I think it's great that you are so open and caring - it is because of people like you that men like Neal have something happy to return to - a caring friend.
Don't let the turkeys get you down. You did the right thing. You deserve more respec than they are giving you. Stand up for yourself. You are doing a good thing.
Posted by: Kathleen A at February 13, 2005 01:10 AM (vnAYT)
6
"And if you think I'm gonna have an affair with someone who thinks chugging tobasco is a smart move, you're off your rocker."
ROTFL!
Posted by: Beth at February 13, 2005 01:14 AM (wAd1w)
7
Funny... when not in your shoes of course.
Great that he is coming home.
Are you expecting the husband home soon too?
I remember that you weren't sure about that scheduled vacation :-)
Cheers,
Agnieszka
Denver, CO
Posted by: Agnieszka O. at February 13, 2005 01:40 AM (MUNUu)
8
Sarah it's just like we always said in the Army.
F**k 'em if they can't take a joke.
You're doing good work. Keep doing it.
Posted by: David at February 13, 2005 11:45 PM (XWUew)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
DANG
I started feeling tears well up in my eyes as I read
this story. And then I let out a long, deliberate ho...ly...crap when I got to the punchline.
Posted by: Sarah at
04:50 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 31 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Maybe it's because you'd already mentioned there was a surprise ending, but the minute I got to the part about a bullet through the heart I thought "Eh? What about that bullet proof vest?"
Posted by: Oda Mae at February 12, 2005 05:37 AM (zOJH0)
2
Hi Sarah,
I was reading the story... and ... wait a minute!
I did hear it before - it was on the radio in Denver last week.
Could you belive this women?
Posted by: Agnieszka O. at February 13, 2005 01:31 AM (MUNUu)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
SINECURE
Amritas pointed me towards
John Ray's response to an article about how much better Europe is.
Hud has an interesting post on Europe's stagnant economy. Both of them made me think about my friends' jobs.
Some jobs here on post are German contract jobs, and the only two Americans I know who have these jobs are my friends who work for the quartermaster here. When soldiers have TA-50 that needs to be laundered, they bring it to my friends. My friends sort it, tag it, and bag it for when the laundry trucks come. They don't actually launder anything; they are just the middle men for the operation. Some days they're quite busy, especially at the end of a deployment. Other days they see very few customers. If no one is coming in, they can do whatever they want: homework, quilting, knitting, watching DVDs, hanging out with Sarah.
Remember, they're employed by the Germans. For this job that a monkey could do, they get paid 10 Euros an hour (which is $13 right now). They work only 20 hours per week each but get six weeks of paid vacation plus Kindergeld (the child allowance the German government gives you just for having a child). They know that they have it good; if they did this same job in the States, no doubt it would be minimum wage ($5.15 per hour, not $13), and there would be no benefits since it's just a part-time job.
I'm glad that my friends have such a great job, but I simply can't understand it. How can the Germans afford to pay them so much for a sinecure? They make more than I did teaching English for the college! I think part of Europe's problem is that they pay way too much for jobs that require no skill. I don't know how they'll continue to give lavish benefits to the monkey jobs.
(No offense, girls: you know I'd love to get paid to knit.)
Posted by: Sarah at
04:19 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 331 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Hee hee. No offense taken. But I often wonder the same thing...How long will they be able to afford paying such high wages for jobs that anyone can do?
Posted by: Erin at February 12, 2005 04:53 AM (ilI3X)
2
FWIW, I work in Texas in the computing industry. Nothing you described seems much different from what I see day to day at various companies I work with. In my experience, the more you are paid in Corporate America the less productive you become, and there are inevitably a ton of useless chair-warmers in most larger enterprises.
Posted by: VOT at February 12, 2005 06:56 PM (sWOH9)
3
VOT,
I often hear/see those kinds of comments and I always wonder why if that's true, the person saying it isn't busy doing nothing so they, too, can make a lot of money.
Certainly there are those who rise via political acumen rather than skill, but if what you say is true, most companies would collapse in on themselves.
Posted by: Bunny Slippers at February 15, 2005 05:00 PM (0sEOJ)
4
As an European living in America, what I don't understand is why some Americans can even think or suggest that people who perform low-level jobs should not get benefits like child allowance,paid vacations, high-quality health care, etc...Those are precisely the people who need the most help from the government! Are these low-level workers just suppose to starve their children, let their children loose without day care and exposed to drugs, never have a vacation or rest in their life?? I guess so according to some Americans who don't care that many of their inner cities are just like or worse than 3rd world cities. The view that if you are a high level worker in a good corporation then you and only you should have benefits like good health care insurance is not only ridiculous/greedy/selfish but also crimimal and unChristian. That is why America has a minority of the richest people in the world (forbes 400), but 45 million people without even health insurance or the most basic needs that every European takes for granted (free university education, surgery, etc). As for the European economy being stagnant, then how come the currency even in litte European countries like Portugal, Luxembourg, or Greece (the Euro) is 30% higher than the dollar? And how come my mother - a retired teacher in Europe - can have fun and travel the world based on her social security monthly alone, while here Social Security is barely enough to pay for basic medication?? America is a great country but has much to learn from Europe instead of insisting that it is the best at everything!
Posted by: PAC at February 16, 2005 12:19 PM (LKlsp)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
February 10, 2005
GRUMPY
I have a couple of things I want to blog about, but to be honest I've been feeling too grumpy lately. Today was just one of those days where everything went wrong: I drove to the next post to re-register our car and realized that I had left my ID in the pocket of my gym sweatshirt. So I drove all the way home and back, only to find that they close for lunch, which they failed to mention when I called for their hours. I got the car registered and then went to drop the dog's stuff off at my friend's house; naturally I had forgotten her key. And so on. Just one of those days.
But it's more than just that: I can tell that I am getting irritable with the end of the deployment. My husband has been on ten billion long-term missions before, but the one this week seriously irks me. I'm grumpy that 1-77 returned from Iraq after only 361 days. I nearly ripped some heads off last night at the FRG meeting; why would you attend a briefing on the redeployment schedule and then just sit there and loudly gossip with the wife next to you, making it impossible for others to hear the guest speaker even when she was using a microphone?
I'm finally tired of the deployment. Thank heavens I've only felt this way for a week; I can't imagine being one of those people who's felt this way all year.
They say PTSD and Combat Operational Stress can include loss of motivation, crying spells, and irritability. Chalk me up as a sufferer.
Posted by: Sarah at
12:36 PM
| Comments (9)
| Add Comment
Post contains 273 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Sarah, you're entitled to be as grumpy as you want to be now. You've been quite a "trooper." In fact, I think you've been amazing.
Hey, you sound like ME--and I've got NO excuse.
Posted by: Beth at February 10, 2005 04:44 PM (DEwIg)
2
Hey Sarah!
If anybody is entitled, you certainly are!
Just keep the faith, plan for your Soldier's return, and stay frosty. One step at a time is all you need to worry about.
These are the worst days. But the reward at the end is absolutely wonderful!
I *love* your blog and read it daily. I'm constantly telling stories from it to my wife and kids. It's almost like you're family . . .
Posted by: Dave at February 10, 2005 06:31 PM (c6xQA)
3
Courage, dear heart... Stay strong...
Posted by: Sgt. B. at February 10, 2005 07:29 PM (QVT9C)
4
Sarah,
Press on, dear. This time may seem like its dragging, but it will be over soon. I know your patience and forbearance will pay off when your husband returns home. You and he will then be the center of each other's attention, as it should be.
It will all be worth the patience when it is over. God bless you for your suffering, dear. Press on. The future is going to be much brighter shortly.
Subsunk
Posted by: Subsunk at February 10, 2005 09:21 PM (adHXR)
5
I, too, am experiencing the same thing. This whole year seems to have gone relatively fast, but these last three or four weeks have been awful. It doesn't help that we haven't been able to have our long chats on the phone either. The love of your life will be home soon and all will be right with the world!
I love you!
Mama
Posted by: Nancy at February 11, 2005 12:40 AM (YuW6k)
6
{{{{Sarah}}}
There's light at the end of that tunnel. Hang in there, you've done great this year.
We're "officially" at 354 days (he reported 2/15, but the days didn't count until the 24th)
We went into double digits just a few hours ago, 99 days to go.
You've done mech better than I have over the past 12 months. Be proud of what you have both accomplished and "drive on"
Tink
Posted by: Tink at February 11, 2005 03:52 AM (S6VXg)
7
Hang in there girl!
Hugs for you ((((((())))))))))
Posted by: MargeinMI at February 11, 2005 10:32 AM (ADDcw)
8
It happens Sarah, and it'll pass. Keep the faith, you're doing just fine.
Gotta go destroy some more Sarin now.
Kalroy
Posted by: Kalroy at February 11, 2005 10:19 PM (i9w6W)
9
Maybe I can brighten your day a bit: your comment about men knitting got me started. I may cut my "first scarf" short as a "first dishrag", though -- I want a more interesting pattern!
Posted by: James at February 15, 2005 08:38 PM (QvU5o)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
HEH
Steve of
Hog on Ice is a Native American, just like Ward Churchill.
Posted by: Sarah at
04:35 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 15 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Me too. My great-grandfather's birth data in the family bible lists "Mother--unknown", code of the time in Texas for "Mother was Indian". Apache. So don't be messin' with ME!
Posted by: Bunker at February 10, 2005 07:29 AM (cyYKH)
2
Turns out I'm not a native American, though a Hawaiian aborigine we don't actually count as native Americans.
Dangnabit, I want some of that free money!!!
Kalroy
Posted by: Kalroy at February 11, 2005 10:21 PM (i9w6W)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
1 ON, 2 OFF
Interesting
news:
Under a plan unveiled to Congress on Wednesday, active duty soldiers could expect two years at their home base after a year of deployment. Reservists would see five years of “dwell time” after each year in active duty service, and Guardsmen would have four to five years at home between deployments.
Army Secretary Francis Harvey said that plan likely wonÂ’t go into effect until at least 2007, when other major training and force adaptations are complete. Officials want to shift the service to a brigade combat team focus over the next two years, growing from 33 brigades to 44.
Posted by: Sarah at
02:48 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 109 words, total size 1 kb.
1
That is one of the dumbest things I've ever heard. Next us taxpayers will be expected to pay each firefighter to 'train' in the firehouse for two days after each day fighting a fire. This means we will have to pay for twice the manpower we really need for the job. We cannot afford the military we have now without putting this additional burden on us.
Posted by: good to go at February 10, 2005 11:47 AM (fLlQ8)
2
Boy GG, you're an idiot. What it means is that we go to the British system, except they rotate every six months. Deploy, rest, train, redeploy. That means at any one time one third of their army is on an operational tour and the other two thirds are either resting or preparing to rotate in - you don't need double the troops, it's just a way to give soldiers a predictable schedule for planning purposes.
So, I guess a fireman isn't earning his money unless he fights a fire everyday? A waste of time and money to train or sit in the firehouse and wait for a fire? Why would anyone sign on for a job where you would never be home and always be in danger? Would you? Then why do you expect military members to happily spend two out of three years away from their wives and kids instead of only one or six months?
Dolt. Idiot. Pay yourself and go fight your own damn fires 24/7.
Posted by: Oda Mae at February 10, 2005 03:41 PM (HkoDl)
3
To whom it may concern:
Many Americans, including most serving military members, are not aware that the very United States Constitution they have
sworn to serve and defend does not apply to them.
Henry Kissenger once stated,- "Military men are just dumb, stupid animals to be used as pawns for foreign policy." (Quoted
from "The Final Days" by Woodward and Berstein).
And though this "war tactic" has been used to the fullest, the actions our organization are trying to EXPOSE includes the
battle being fought by our service members within their own ranks.
There is a secret unconstitutional law that prohibits military members from seeking final redress for wrongful actions taken
upon them while serving. These certain actions may include murder,severe reprisal (to individuals exposing fraud, waste, and
abuse under the "whistleblower protection act"), rape, human experimentation, medical malpractice, gross and criminal
negligence, etc.
The shameful law is called the Feres Doctrine, named after the young Lt. Rudolph Feres, who died in a barracks fire caused by
the negligence of the Army. This doctrine bars constitutional redress of wrongful acts or omissions resulting in injury or
death arising from non-legitimate military necessity or decisions.
The Feres Doctrine law was not created by the United States Congress, who makes laws and oversees the military, but
judicially created. This law has been in existence for over 54 years, however Congress and the United States “mainstream”
media refuse to address and report respectfully. Most of the tax paying public is unaware of the extreme human and
constitutional abuses being silenced by this law as it is staying locked behind the iron gates of the military. Who will assist in broadening public discourse in this matter?
The only organization I found that will even address the Feres Doctrine is Veterans Equal Rights Protection Advocacy. Their Feres Doctrine abolishment initiative seeks to restore constitutional rights to the men and women serving in our military.
Our Congress continues to use American military personnel to provide protection of human rights around the world, yet those very military personnel are not afforded the same protection in the United States due to the Feres Doctrine. At the least, I
respectfully request that you contact both of your US Senators and Senator Arlin Spector (PA) who is the Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee. Also, please sign our on-line petition.
We owe every freedom we possess to those who have fought for "US" and this Country. For more in depth information please go to www.VERPA.org . Please pass this information on to all Citizens you believe might be interested in this information,especially those who may be affected by the Feres Doctrine.
Posted by: Leighbelle4878 at February 11, 2005 12:12 AM (GIV8s)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
February 09, 2005
SWEET
Lex: "Did it ever occur to you that maybe the hero of the story is Segeth?"
Best ending line in a Smallville
ever.
Posted by: Sarah at
05:45 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 25 words, total size 1 kb.
FLAG
There's a contest to
create a new EU flag. My favorite is the second one down
here. I'm still laughing out loud.
Posted by: Sarah at
05:28 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 24 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Actually the contest is to create a new flag for the Democratic National Committee, but since the EU, UN and DNC are all so similar I guess it doesn't really matter, LOL.
SlagleRock Out!
Posted by: SlagleRock at February 09, 2005 02:51 PM (AtSju)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
IRAQ TV
FX is making a
TV show about Iraq. Cool. But unfortunately all they can show is good soldiers doing their job.
But not any and every angle of war is being depicted. One aspect is glaringly absent from most projects: negativity. The U.S. soldier is the hero; his cause is just. Storylines featuring the Abu Ghraib prisoner abuse scandal or war protests are no-nos.
I've said it before and I'll say it again: damn those Abu Ghraib soldiers. Because of a handful of dirtbags, every mention of Operation Iraqi Freedom from now on will have some disclaimer about torture at Abu Ghraib. It used to be that every article about the war had that line about the number of troops who had died since Bush waved his Mission Accomplished banner. Now every article has to mention something about Abu Ghraib.
There are plenty of stories that can be told from Iraq without harping on the naked pyramids. Tell a story like SFC Smith's. Tell about 1SG Kasal, shot seven times and still fighting. You want humor? Throw in syrup chugging. You want suspense? Follow the soldiers of 2-2 INF as they kicked in doors in Fallujah. You want drama? Good and decent soldiers are dying all the time, and there's never a dry eye in the house.
Just don't tell me that what people want to see when they turn on a program about Iraq is scandal and unethical behavior. There's plenty of that crap on Nip/Tuck.
Posted by: Sarah at
02:45 AM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
Post contains 251 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Sarah - You and I want to see the stories of heroism, drama, character, humor, etc. I'm sure that we are not unusual in that respect, and most Americans want that as well.
But there are a lot of folks in Hollyweed who think that the average demographic is the anti-war elitist. Just proves that they don't know their target public!
Posted by: Barb at February 09, 2005 05:16 PM (q9AXC)
2
I think the biggest scandal of the war has been Bush and the Mission Accomplished banner. The mission is still not accomplished and I could care less if soldiers are blowing off a little steam by mud wrestling. Over here people are worried more about whether a minor league baseball stadium is going up in there backyard or passing a law to stop people from wearing low-riding pants. Someone needs to get their priorities straight!
Posted by: Chuck at February 09, 2005 11:17 PM (gBiQ2)
3
Chuck,
Militarily speaking, a mission refers to a very specific goal within a larger action. A war consists of multiple missions, each of which can be celebrated in their accomlishment without saying that the war has been "won."
Posted by: Beth at February 10, 2005 05:42 PM (DEwIg)
4
I think the biggest scandal is the fact that there were no WMD. My brothers went over there to fight, they are still on the ground there now. The reason they were sent there was a complete lie, and that hurts a lot.
There is plenty of evidence to show that Abu Ghraib was NOT just a few bad apples, but directives from the top. The same torture techmiques were being used an Gitmo. Before the torture was discovered the administration was playing games with coming up with justifications for torture, and trying to redefine torture. You're kidding yourself if you pretend that it was just a few people acting independently. Responsibility is supposed to go to the leadership, Bush dodging blame has shamed us all.
Other serious scandals:
Dropping the ball on guarding hundreds of thousands of tons of explosives, while rushing to protect the oil ministry.
Throwing away billions of taxpayer dollars in high dollar no bid contracts to Halliburton, despite other qualified companies being available for bid. $5000 toilet seats look like a bargain these days.
Working closely with Ahmed Chalabi who was an Iranian spy passing intelligence to Iran. Worse was when Bush tried to cover his ass and and said "Adhmed who?" when asked about him after the scandal hit.
Falujah - The collective punishment of the people of that city was unconscionable. No other move has given so much support to the insurgents.
There are many more that come to mind.
Posted by: VOT at February 10, 2005 05:43 PM (sWOH9)
5
Why do Liberals always post a laundry list of the same lies and twisted half-truths?
>there were no WMD.
Every intelligence service on planet Earth told there were, as did the UN itself, as late as 1999. So, where did it all go? Please explain your theory.
>The reason they were sent there
Congress voted to send troops to Iraq in the Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq in October 2002. It listed over a dozen reasons for sending troops to Iraq; the existence of WMDs was just one of them.
>Abu Ghraib was NOT just a few bad apples, but
>directives from the top
I'll never understand this particular Liberal lie, except in the deep-seated need to smear the troops and their Commander-in-Chief as much as possible.
>torture techmiques were being used an Gitmo
We do not use torture. We make people somewhat uncomfortable. That's not torture, and calling it so does not make it so. Torture is defined as causing physical damage.
>guarding hundreds of thousands of tons of
>explosives
I believe you're talking about the 380 tons of explosives that were moved after the invasion began, but before our troops reached that area. Hard to tell, with all your overblown rhetoric. It's true, after all: Liberals are bad at math! "Hundreds of thousands of tons," indeed.
>no bid contracts to Halliburton
Are you talking about the no-bid contracts awarded to Halliburton by Clinton during the Balkans conflict? If so, you're the first Liberal to acknowlege them. Congratulations!
>other qualified companies being available for bid
Name them. Then explain why you think they can do a tenth of the job Halliburton has been doing for decades, a tenth as well. Then explain why you think time-critical jobs should wait for a two-to-four year bidding process, when only one company can actually do the job.
>Ahmed Chalabi who was an Iranian spy
Proof, please. Thanks!
>collective punishment of the people of that city
You mean the people who left notes in their houses thanking the Americans for freeing them, and inviting them to stay in their homes, when the Americans allowed the Fallujah residents to leave the city? Those people?
You need to come out of your walled ivory tower and learn what's really going on in the world.
Posted by: CavalierX at February 11, 2005 12:13 AM (sA6XT)
6
Cavalier,
I am not a liberal, nor do I live in an ivory tower. I am actually independent of any political party, unlike you, so I don't have any reservations admitting to the failings of Clinton, Bush, or any other leader. It is really quite funny that you accuse me of partisanship, seeing that you obviously live in such blatantly self-imposed partisan ignorance. You make excuses for the failings of Bush & co., simply because you imagine that they are on your team, while we all know that if Bush belonged to a different political party you would be calling for blood. Speaking of blood, your hostility to facts is summed up by suggesting that there was no torture in Abu Ghraib. There were images of a prisoner's legs being torn open by attack dogs. It was torture, plain and simple. But since it is your guy who is ultimately responsible, you have to play a Clintonian definition game. The facts are there staring you in the face, but they don't fit your worldview, so you hide from them.
Posted by: VOT at February 13, 2005 12:29 AM (EZJmU)
7
Attacking me personally just makes you look like more of a fool. Sorry to burst your bubble, but I'm an unaffiliated Conservative. Maybe you should stop digging your hole when you're in over your head. As for your insistence that the Abu Ghraib guards did things they shouldn't have: I agree with that assessment. So does the Bush administration and the UCMJ, which is why they're being tried for exceeding their orders and committing crimes. Next point... oh, wait, you were out of those.
Posted by: CavalierX at February 14, 2005 12:36 PM (sA6XT)
8
FWIW, you attacked me personally. I responded in kind. You responded with another personal attack. You obviously aren't a bright one.
Glad we agree on the fact that there was torture, though you have changed your position on the matter.
Since you don't seem to be able to rebut my point except for by agreeing with it I guess this discussion isn't going to go anywhere. Have fun with you head in the sand.
Posted by: VOT at February 19, 2005 12:55 AM (EZJmU)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
February 08, 2005
MONSTERS
These photos are simply hilarious. (Found via CavX's sidebar) Also
this is funny.
Posted by: Sarah at
03:55 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 15 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Hello, Sarah. I'm glad you got a chuckle from the Halloween post. You and your husband deserve a lot of thanks for what you are both doing for all of our sakes.
I think you guys should all get a ticker tape parade down Broadway. Best wishes for a speedy victory and happy homecoming!
Posted by: Korla Pundit at February 08, 2005 06:08 PM (Od1fF)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
HA
Did you see that
CB's signed a book deal? Commenters at Armor Geddon keep suggesting Red 6 do the same about his time in Fallujah.
Me and Red 6, before he got all famous on us!
I told him when he gets home, as payback for all the boxes I've lugged up to his apartment and trips to the travel agent, he owes me steak and Cristal. He said, "more like Santa Fe Gorditas and Dr. Pepper." Ha. I realized the other day that not only has my husband been gone for a year, but so has one of our best friends. I can't wait to hang out with him again.
(I am seriously out of focus in that photo. What's the deal?)
Posted by: Sarah at
09:02 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 125 words, total size 1 kb.
COOL
I've been meaning to point out something Oda Mae steered me towards:
Cox & Forkum's tribute to Ayn Rand
Posted by: Sarah at
04:05 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 21 words, total size 1 kb.
1
The thing about Ayn Rand is that she should be hated by the Right on many counts. She is an atheist who derides Christianity angrily. She opposed democracy. In her personal life she was a hypocrite and an immoral coward - she was an immigrant but railed on the evils of immigration, she cheated on her husband with Nathaniel Branden, she was a drug addict hooked on speed, she preached an arch-individualistic ideology, but developed an organization of followers adhering to a cult like following. Worst, she embodied the thought of Nietzche, who was both the father of the modern left's ideology, as well as an inspiration for the Nazis. On top of all that, she was a horrible writer - her characters were cardboard cutouts who engaged in incessant and unbearable rants disguised as monologues. If you look kat the actions of her heros, rather than just their words, they were really just as despicable as her villains.
I realize that it is CPC (Conservative Politically Correct) to be a Rand fan, but I just don't get it. At least there are some conservatives that get what an odious figure she was:
http://www.nationalreview.com/flashback/flashback200501050715.asp
Posted by: VOT at February 08, 2005 04:49 PM (sWOH9)
2
One other thing I meant to add that in the Fountainhead she justified r a p e! That is truly sick. Rand spits in the face of family values.
Posted by: VOT at February 08, 2005 04:57 PM (sWOH9)
3
Hmmm, AyN Rand is useful up to a certain point, beyond which the partakers seem to end up being somewhat inhuman. I appreciate the theory but found the practice in the Rand form as somewhat distasteful. Probably because I have a bit of faith. Cold Hearted is the word that comes to mind. But since I avoided delving deep into it, I don't know whether I am really blessed or unknowing. But I still found the synopsis interesting.
Posted by: jd at February 09, 2005 09:22 PM (3ULfT)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
WHAT?
Mud wrestling? My husband's platoon barely has time to eat or sleep, and some units in Iraq have time for parties that would make fraternities jealous? What on earth is going on?
I've avoided writing about it so far, but one of the hardest things about the deployment for me to handle is the difference in mission. Some soldiers are working around the clock while others have so much free time that they're bored or causing trouble. Where is the sense in that?
I know I'm biased and think that my husband works harder than anyone else in Iraq. And maybe he does get more down time than I'm led to believe. But his company's sector is the size of Kosovo, so he doesn't even have time to go to the gym or talk to me. He's allowed 30 minutes on the computer, but often he doesn't take the full time because he's got too much to do. When he was in Najaf, he fell asleep on the phone with me: his platoon was working four hour shifts with two hour breaks (four on, two off, four on, two off) for an entire month. Not all units in Iraq are doing that.
I am trying to understand the distribution of missions in Iraq, but I can't. I hope that when my husband comes home, I can ask him more about what he's done. Perhaps I've misunderstood, but I think at the end of the day my husband would be far too tired to go to a mud wrestling party.
Posted by: Sarah at
03:21 AM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
Post contains 261 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Sarah - I doubt your husband has time for mud wrestling, as most soldiers do not. The soldiers in those pictures were transitioning out and had free time. I've read someplace before about the pool parties, etc. - it's usually State Dept and DoD staff or embassy staff that partake. The soldiers I adopted at Camp Victory have zero time for that kinda stuff. I don't know where Camp Bucca is located - but - it might not have soldiers that go out in the field, etc. Like I said - these were 'lucky' soldiers in the sense that they had time and place to do these things. I don't think it was anything serious - just letting off steam. But nonetheless - it sends a bad message to some people.
Posted by: Kathleen A at February 08, 2005 07:27 AM (vnAYT)
2
There was a phenomenon I noticed during my time in green: When we were working, we were working our tails off. But, when we weren't working like madmen, we were often bored to tears. It always seemed like there was either too much to do, or nothing to do. The military always used to leave me amazed at how the big green machine runs.
Posted by: Cerberus at February 08, 2005 08:17 AM (nzIoS)
3
Cerberus is right...your field time is spent between two modes, frantic activity and stretches of nearly intolerable boredom. Gulf 1 was like that, nothing to do but train and find dead goats and camels for GPS waypoints.
On the other hand, REMFs always throw parties in the field while us folks holding the sharp sticks dig holes. The grass is always greener, however...while MPs and supply and commo folks get to have drunken mud fights in the rear, its those folks who are always begging us "please, let me shoot a burst from the main gun" or "can I fondle your sniper rifle?" You never see a grunt ask "wow, can I fill out that parts requisition form? That looks so cool" So it evens out.
Posted by: Jason at February 08, 2005 11:12 AM (565iX)
4
I was astounded when I found out that while my buddies and I were invading Iraq, the well-fed guys who were in Kuwait or sitting in the Persian Gulf got paid the same imminent-danger pay as us.
Posted by: Eric Johnson at February 09, 2005 12:56 AM (84Org)
5
This post, not the event it describes, explains two of our weakest areas in the military.
First, as you have said, often times family members are left in the dark, even when realistically speaking telling them some information would be harmless. I'm not saying that a spouse, friend or other loved one needs to know time, place, or event specifics but a little more of what goes on may actually be good.
Second, who cares what the "REMF's" are doing? Yeah it sucks we have to get down and dirty while others still sit at desks and "fill out that parts requisition form". It all has to be done. Anyone who doesn't like what they are doing or is jealous of the living conditions of others can always change their MOS/AFSC (Job Specialty). A person in the military is only limited by themselves. Yes, we all belly ache about certain career fields getting off "light" or "easy" but the reality is everyone has a job to do so let them do theirs while focusing on your own.
"I know I'm biased and think that my husband works harder than anyone else in Iraq." This is how every spouse or family member should feel. This is the kind of support our Soldiers, Sailors, Airman, and Marines need.
Great post! It is refreshing to see someone who is sooooo into their spouse.
SlagleRock Out!
Posted by: SlagleRock at February 09, 2005 11:09 AM (AtSju)
6
First time poster! I also read ARMOR G and have to say I love both blogs! On topic:
We called them 'pogues' in the Marine Corps, same thing as REMF's.
While I agree everyone has a job to do, not all jobs are equal and that's a fact. I was in the infantry 0311 and yes, while we did our share of bitching about how unfair things seemed to be sometimes, we always had immense pride in the fact that we were grunts and not pogues.
Posted by: Jpck20 at February 10, 2005 12:45 PM (PMa6H)
7
Greetings,
I was in VietNam for about a month and at DaNang which is about like being stationed at a gigantic airport so I saw zero horrors. We repaired airplanes and that was about it. So when I saw the TV show China Beach I used to wonder where was this place? You didn't get much further to the rear than us and we never saw that many woman! And romance? The TV show was full of it plus drama but where I was the job was 12 on 12 off 7 days a week. Also as stated earlier working was the only thing to do. I love your and your husbands sites and am very proud of the service he's doing. You guys are changing the world!
Posted by: Drake Steel at February 14, 2005 01:09 AM (eeb6P)
8
Jpck20,
Didn't appreciate all the work that went into making it possible for him to do his JOB.
The POGUES appreciated what he did though and never demanded that he grovel in front of them as he would have them do.
Posted by: Jay101 at March 06, 2005 09:31 PM (rCLtG)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
FIGHT
Bunker pointed out a great
post by Michael Totten. The hook:
Believe me, you donÂ’t know what a tense political fight feels like until the person yelling at you is from a country you recently bombed and currently occupy.
It's was a very interesting evening. And don't miss the Iraqi's one sentence summary of feelings towards the US.
Posted by: Sarah at
03:01 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 60 words, total size 1 kb.
THANK YOU
I know it was a commercial and it was staged, but it sure choked me up. We OCONUS folks can watch the Anheuser-Busch Super Bowl ad
here. I don't care if we are in Germany; Budweiser is still the king of beers.
Posted by: Sarah at
02:44 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 46 words, total size 1 kb.
1
We CONUS folks here got all choked up, too. It was a very touching tribute, staged or not.
Posted by: Susan at February 08, 2005 11:05 AM (7qlZr)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
EWW
Yesterday I came home from the middle school all fired up to write. I sat in on some classes, and I think 7th graders aren't as scary as I'd imagined. I had some observations that I was going to post -- nothing too riveting -- when I walked in the house to find a big old mess.
I'm still dogsitting, and the dog had gotten sick all over the rug. I couldn't even tell which end it had come from! I borrowed my friend's steam vac and cleaned it all up, and then dumped the dog in the tub for a bath. And immediately after his bath, he threw up again. It was a long, disgusting evening.
Lately my husband and I have had the worst timing. He logged online while I was wrestling with the dog in the tub. Two nights ago I heard him log on and I jumped up so fast I dumped my drink all over the recliner. Last week the phone rang six times during our ten minute chat.
I think we just need to talk face to face instead. And maybe wait a little while until we get our own puppy.
Posted by: Sarah at
02:27 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 199 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Take a quick look at
this site for some links on education in the right column. May be of help in the future.
Posted by: Mike at February 08, 2005 08:18 AM (cyYKH)
2
Yeah - those puppies are alot of work BUT they are also so much fun and so cute. I am always happy to see them get to the age of about 2 cause then they're well trained!
Posted by: toni at February 08, 2005 09:51 AM (SHqVu)
3
When my wife and I first got our puppies, we had so many infuriating messes to deal with we developed a theory of "cuteness as a natural defense mechanism". Expect a book soon.
Posted by: James at February 08, 2005 03:03 PM (QvU5o)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
February 06, 2005
ELECTION
My friend sent me a wonderful email forward:
To all,
Rarely do I send emails to everyone in the command. I highly suggest you take 3 minutes and 12 seconds (the length of this video) out of your day to view the fruits of your labor. With all the negative spin and focused attention on the struggles, difficulties, and bloodshed going on in Iraq, this should be a true verification of what the REALISM is behind our sacrifice and dedication as American Soldiers. As an augmented Special Forces guy on the ground in Iraq during the early part of the war, I saw it every single day. But trying to communicate what that is like, is often difficult. If this doesn't make you proud to be an American, and TREASURE what we have built here in the United States, now alive and well in Iraq, then nothing will. To each and all who have given everything to uphold, support, and defend FREEDOM THROUGH MILITARY VICTORY, I offer my personal thanks for a job WELL DONE.
http://adamkeiper.blogs.com/comparevideo/files/Iraq_Election.wmv
Very Respectfully,
LCDR Keith Harrison, USN
So go watch it. And smile.
Posted by: Sarah at
04:02 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 190 words, total size 1 kb.
112kb generated in CPU 0.0268, elapsed 0.1551 seconds.
64 queries taking 0.1368 seconds, 302 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.