June 30, 2009
TEH Zs
Worlds have collided: my husband met
Chuck Z tonight.
We only got to see them for a short time, but we're hoping to see them again before the end of the week.
Also, the Z daughter is wicked adorable. I want a head-to-head Cute Off between her and
Pink Ninja.
Posted by: Sarah at
06:30 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 52 words, total size 1 kb.
1
This I would like to see.
I hope you had fun and there were lots of laughs.
Posted by: Kate at June 30, 2009 08:14 PM (J1l7A)
2
I have seen photos of girl Z, and she has the most gorgeous eyes ever! She is a beauty!
Posted by: awtm at June 30, 2009 09:41 PM (NuDbL)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
NAILED IT
Hahahaha. This is too funny.
There's nothing I like more than a
current events joke.
(via AirForceWife)
Posted by: Sarah at
02:04 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 19 words, total size 1 kb.
1
That AFW and her Craig's List addiction. LOL She finds the BEST stuff!!
Posted by: Guard Wife at June 30, 2009 06:09 PM (M+hWl)
2
"Honduras: so many latinos involved, Sotomayor can't decide who's right"This principle also explains Obama's initial reaction to the Iran crisis. Muslims, like wise Latinas, are always gOOd persyns. (Exceptions: Irshad Manji, Kathryn Jean Lopez.) So in a Muslim vs. Muslim conflict without any Europpressive Crusader involvement, Obama didn't know which side to pick. Life is so much simpler when a nation has millions of scapegoats ... ice monsters who cower out of fear of being branded racist ... the ultimate no-no in Omerica.
We are shocked that craigslist has not removed this obviously Racistâ„¢ non-ad after nine hours. Where's our civilian security force when we need it?
Posted by: kevin at June 30, 2009 07:36 PM (xHfeS)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
June 29, 2009
HONDURAS: OBAMA FAIL
I am just completely flabbergasted by the events in Honduras.
A president decides he wants to be president longer than the law allows. His country does everything possible to get him to follow the law, but the president keeps abusing his power and acting like a lunatic. The country respects its constitution and decides to legally and justifiably oust him.
And Obama is siding with
him?
I must be missing something, because this is insane.
Remember when all the loony lefties swore that George Bush was going to stage a coup and stay in office a third term? They went berserk predicting this. If it had actually happened, you can bet your sweet bippy that they would've used every channel possible to toss him out. And rightly so: the leader has to respect the law of the land or the citizens get rid of him.
But now a president in another country has actually just done what the nuts swore Bush was going to do, and Pres Obama is backing the would-be dictator.
Oh, and also
Castro, Chavez, and Ortega side with Obama too.
Have I gone completely mad? This is sick.
Posted by: Sarah at
06:01 PM
| Comments (11)
| Add Comment
Post contains 195 words, total size 1 kb.
1
".....you can bet your sweet bippy?"
Has Flip Wilson taken over TTG?
(I agree with you on the madness of it all,by the way)
Posted by: MaryIndiana at June 29, 2009 06:16 PM (SaSZV)
2
my favorite part of the original statement was the respecting the 'democratic norms'
Where do these fall in order of importance:
vote for bills you did not read
accuse and portray your opponents as terrorists
tell public companies how to run themselves and pick and choose which contracts they should follow and which they should disregard
Posted by: wifeunit at June 29, 2009 06:58 PM (t5K2U)
3
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124623220955866301.html
This editorial was really good. And, from googling the writer, she has been covering the gov't in Honduras for awhile.
Posted by: Guard Wife at June 29, 2009 08:39 PM (43JOF)
4
Oh, and P.S. -- Let me get this straight:
Hack your unarmed people to death with axes in the streets & we'll call it a spirited debate and not get involved.
Violate your country's constitution and ignore the democratic principles your people desire & we'll do our best to return you to power.
WTF?
Posted by: Guard Wife at June 29, 2009 08:41 PM (43JOF)
5
I think Obama thinks in generalities and keywords rather than through
detailed logic. "Military coup" is a bad thing in his mind: forget the
context and nuance.
I wonder if Oster, Beck, Stauffenberg, etc had been successful in their
planned coup against the Hitler regime--and Obama had been around at
the time--his reaction would have been the same.
Posted by: david foster at June 29, 2009 09:26 PM (uWlpq)
6
It seems to me to be a recurring pattern with Obama. His initial response on pretty much everything is exactly the opposite of what any decent human would instinctively say. Time and again, going back over the past year or two into the campaign he has come out with a public statement on -pick random crisis-.
Within a day or two after receiving criticism from all corners his lackeys start to 'redifine' what he orginally meant. This is usually followed within a week by a direct statement from Obama himself taking the exact opposite position he originally stated, while claiming that his new position is exactly the same as his original.
This is going to blow up in his face at some point. His instincts are just completely wrong from the get-go and needs a week or two for his spin meisters to clean up his bad judgements. One of these days he won't have a week to retool his thoughts, and when that happens I hope it isn't something bad enough to cause real trouble.
Posted by: John at June 29, 2009 09:46 PM (crTpS)
7
I will have to admit I hadn't heard and it
is terribly shocking!
Posted by: Darla at June 29, 2009 11:48 PM (LP4DK)
8
I am very concerned (read that frightened) with his attitude, I think of all the things he and others were saying GWB would do, mainly declare martial law and keep on being president, and then have done the same thing they were against while GWB was president.
Posted by: Ruth H at June 30, 2009 02:05 PM (Y4oAO)
9
david,
It only takes one word to trigger the prOper response from the One: "military". The M-word disturbs Him so much that He didn't use it to describe his "civilian security force".
I was initially surprised that Europpressive Hillary was on the side of the gOOd persyns since she is not a wise Latina womyn, but she and Obama probably learned everything they know about Honduras from the very same MSM that defies reality and deifies Him. Other viewpoints from nonpersyns like O'Grady simply do not matter.
Ruth H,
Anything Bushaitan did or was supposedly going to do was eeeevil by definition. Obama can do the same things as Bushaitan but the results will be infinitely better because He is a superiOr being. Iraq was the greatest crime of all time, but security operations (must not use the M-word!) in Afghanistan will attain new heights of nobility.
Posted by: kevin at June 30, 2009 06:22 PM (xHfeS)
10
God, please let us over out the Democrat majorities in the Congress in 2010 and Obama in 2012. Amen...
Posted by: Miss Ladybug at July 01, 2009 12:15 AM (paOhf)
Posted by: tim at July 01, 2009 01:36 PM (nno0f)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
June 28, 2009
ANNOYING MATH
Jet lag + head cold + pregnant, so no meds = miserable and exhausted
Posted by: Sarah at
03:20 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 16 words, total size 1 kb.
June 27, 2009
CHARLIE WANTS A BABY
When Charlie was acting all depressed, he trudged out of our room like Eeyore. "Where are you going?" I asked him. "What's wrong." My husband followed him and then chuckled. "Oh, I get it, Charlie is sad because he wants a baby."
Yes, that's our spare bedroom. Yes, it's looked like that for over a year. Yes, it's absurd. But leaving it up seemed less weird to me than taking it all down and leaving the room completely empty. (OK,
mildly less weird. Also I'm just lazy.)
But apparently what Charlie wants, Charlie gets. After a week of doing everything wrong -- lots of booze, sitting in hot tubs, eating sushi, taking large doses of NyQuil -- it turns out that I am pregnant again.
We laughed that this is our "unplanned" pregnancy. My friend's mother, an OB nurse, asked me what my doctor's plan was now. Plan? There isn't one this time around! This was our Hail Mary. This was me looking at my husband one night and saying, "We could try this and potentially save $12,000...whaddya think?" and then completely putting it out of my head because, seriously, neither of us thought it would work.
I took a pregnancy test to confirm that I was
not pregnant, before I contacted the IVF doctor to get my PGD bloodwork started.
I took a second one because I didn't believe the result of the first one.
We have no plan. I ran and hurried to take a prenatal vitamin because, let's face it, after two and a half unsuccessful years I had gotten pretty lax about remembering to do that.
Anyway, I'm just putting it out here because, well, this is where I cash chips.
I told my husband that my feelings about the miracle of life have actually regressed, gotten creepier. I was always a life-starts-at-conception person. And now, now I feel like we have to wait around and see if this
becomes a baby. It has a 50% chance of being a baby or a 50% chance of being...a lump of mutated cells. I hate that this is what this process has done to me, that it's made me detach myself so much. That I'm like some gross abortion advocate who only sees a lump of cells. But that's where I'm at these days. It doesn't
become a baby until it has a heartbeat. And even then...Baby #2 had one of those...
I'm just hanging back for the next three weeks or so. Hey, three weeks, that's when my husband deploys. How convenient.
So one of two things will happen. 1) This will be a baby, in which case my husband will already be deployed by the time a heartbeat can be detected and will still be deployed when the baby is born. What marvelous timing. Or 2) It will be a lump of cells, in which case there will be no heartbeat, I will take care of business because I am now a pro at miscarriage, and then I will start the bloodwork for the PGD and proceed as planned, only a month or two behind schedule.
Either way, whatever.
I know no one knows how to react to this news. I told AWTM over the phone and her reaction was like "Um, yay?, er, right? Hooray! er..." so I just decided to put it here instead. If you don't read my blog, I'm not telling you.
You can feel however you want about the news. I'd prefer if you didn't get
too excited, or tell me that the fourth time's a charm or something. But happy's OK. And hopeful is good too. (Note: Do not tell me that this happened because I "relaxed" or I will ban you from my blog. Or I would if I knew how to do that. Even though this is our "unplanned" pregnancy, there was nothing haphazard about it. The day was specifically chosen to maximize success. We just didn't plan for it to work. Hence the booze and hot tubs. This is as close to a whoopsie as the Groks can get.)
At this point, I don't know if I'll talk about it anymore, at least not until Heartbeat Week. Not until I know anything for certain.
But let's see if we can get Charlie that baby he wants...
Actually, I'm pretty sure Charlie just wants to play with all the baby's toys.
And my husband says that if this baby lives, he wants to name it John Elway. (Now that's a bit of guy trivia that I didn't get: three Superbowl losses before a win.) AWTM says we should name it Bellagio if it's a girl. We got jokes.
My husband says he just really doesn't want a Jim Kelly baby.
(How does that man remember how many Super Bowls every quarterback lost but can't remember where anything is located in our kitchen?)
Posted by: Sarah at
12:59 PM
| Comments (37)
| Add Comment
Post contains 818 words, total size 5 kb.
1
I am clicking with the nonplussed thing now. So there is that. ;-)
I have happiness and hope. But stuff for the other side too.
This totally made me smile at any rate.
It would be super fantastic nice. And for this time when the scales aren't tipping noticeably either way, I'll be practicing some jedi mind tricks for it to go the way I want it to.
Posted by: wifeunit at June 27, 2009 03:08 PM (LXXeU)
2
Maybe baby's got plans for that $12,000 and so figured he/she better show up quick before you spend it
I know you've mixed emotions - I get it, but I'm still excited that you have this chance. I'll be following along and hoping for all the best for you!
Posted by: rc at June 27, 2009 04:01 PM (89qJF)
3
Believe you me you do not want a Jim Kelly baby...
Er...uh HIP HIP HOORAY!
Posted by: awtm at June 27, 2009 04:37 PM (NuDbL)
4
Wishing you luck. *fingers crossed*
Posted by: The Army Wife at June 27, 2009 04:56 PM (wB597)
5
I wish you luck. fingers Xed.
LAW
Posted by: LAW at June 27, 2009 04:58 PM (eBMwP)
6
I'm just shaking my head and laughing. You can't make this stuff up. I'm hopeful, but I'll be praying, if that's ok with you.
Posted by: dutchgirl at June 27, 2009 06:23 PM (hLAkQ)
7
fingers crossed - hoping for the absolute best.
Posted by: sharona at June 27, 2009 07:11 PM (BeRta)
8
Long time lurker ... first time
caller commenter.
I'm happy and hopeful for you and your husband.
Posted by: Heather at June 27, 2009 08:54 PM (E/7hG)
9
Wow. Well, fingers crossed and hoping going on.
Posted by: airforcewife at June 27, 2009 09:08 PM (NqbuI)
10
Some pretty stupendous kids got their start being 'marinated', so I will remain cautiously optimistic with your news and I feel where you are coming from.
You are welcome to dial my number and cash chips like a crazy person.
Posted by: Guard Wife at June 27, 2009 10:50 PM (UIGsI)
11
you know, I have been thinking about this, do you suppose Charile thought you went to get a baby?
Posted by: awtm at June 27, 2009 11:05 PM (NuDbL)
12
Sarah, someday you've gotta tell Charlie the truth. "Charlie, I know you want a baby, but you can't have one. You're a male!" And then he'll look like
this, though he won't be bad ... just sad.
Don't let him watch
this movie. It might give him ideas.
Seriously, count me on the hope bandwagon.
Posted by: Amritas at June 27, 2009 11:56 PM (2eQQr)
13
I'll be cautiously hopeful for you, and keep you in my prayers.
Posted by: Miss Ladybug at June 28, 2009 12:19 AM (paOhf)
14
Wow. I'm both hopeful and worried at the same time. In fact, I'm so full of hope I'm almost changey.
Praying so hard for you!
Posted by: FbL at June 28, 2009 12:38 AM (HwqvF)
15
Hopeful, ever hopeful. Steady on.
Posted by: Pamela at June 28, 2009 12:51 AM (jV2Nw)
16
Happy and hopeful for you and your husband, and Charlie. Maybe this will make Charlie cheer up.
The room reminds me of our baby room that we had decorated for 4 years before it was needed. I had the same dilemma about changing the room or leaving it ready for a baby. I pray that your room is in use soon.
Posted by: Susan at June 28, 2009 02:58 AM (Y8ZGj)
17
At this point, we need to petition congress to pass a resolution stating that you are now pregnant, and will stay pregnant through term, including a 3-week overdue delivery. Because they'll pass any legislation they can't actually enforce.
We just need to figure out how to tax your uterus and they'd be all over it. (Pun not intended. Bawney Fwank would most certainly not be all over your uterus for any reason.)
No pork comments either.
And the more I think about it, centripetal forces at pole position may have had some effect. (Pun only partially intended.)
In any case, I am happy for you and just as excited as I am every time, just as hopeful for success, and just as worried. That is, "just as" being relative to how I feel, not comparing my feelings on the issue to how you feel.
Feet and knees together now.
Posted by: Chuck at June 28, 2009 06:04 AM (r6BDb)
18
OMG...just..OMG. Stunned,but with you come what may.
Posted by: MaryIndiana at June 28, 2009 08:28 AM (CZowR)
Posted by: David Boxenhorn at June 28, 2009 09:07 AM (0Zrfb)
20
I'm a long time lurker in the "hoping Charlie gets what he wants" camp.
I'm happy, hopeful, and praying for you, the often deployed hubs, and the perpetual puppy.
Posted by: sheila at June 28, 2009 10:30 AM (Bf9pt)
Posted by: CaliValleyGirl at June 28, 2009 10:38 AM (deur4)
22
I have to add that every time I see Charlie in that picture I totally crack up. For some reason that picture sets off the giggles in me, I can't figure it out. I think it is the lion hair-do he has.
Posted by: airforcewife at June 28, 2009 12:04 PM (NqbuI)
23
Full of hope and cautious optimism - with prayers for good measure. And with you, at least in spirit, the whole way through.
Hugs to you and the hubby, and scritches to Charlie.
Posted by: jck at June 28, 2009 12:07 PM (d6k/G)
24
I'll be crossing my fingers and hoping hard for you.
Posted by: Leofwende at June 28, 2009 01:45 PM (28CBm)
25
Oh, my gosh, I get slack for one day, and this!
Happy and excited, and praying. And possibly standing on my head in the garden. (It worked for AFW's MIL's house...)
Posted by: She of the Sea at June 28, 2009 06:42 PM (J1l7A)
26
Hope and prayers being sent your way...
Posted by: Mrs. Who at June 28, 2009 09:41 PM (S5QVM)
27
Since I am a bit obsessed with your journey and since I too expect to one day have similar results from some sorta unplanned bizzarely normal yet, for you and I, very unnormal circumstances .... lemme say this: You totally Grok'd it.
Makes sense don't it? {wink}
Pat Charlie on the head for me. And give MrGrok a wink nudge.
We all must meet face to face sometime. Oh the stories we could share!
Posted by: Darla at June 29, 2009 12:07 AM (LP4DK)
28
Ha, Darla, you nailed it. I had sex when I was ovulating and it made me pregnant. Which took me completely by surprise. Heh.
Posted by: Sarah at June 29, 2009 06:34 AM (TWet1)
29
I will add my hopefulness to the others, plus I wanted to say that this post made me laugh-out-loud despite the serious subject matter. I love when you do the sarcastic dry humor thing, because you totally nail it.
Posted by: loquita at June 29, 2009 09:18 AM (4gstU)
30
I am staying with hopeful. The way this happened is quite different from the other times. Maybe you had to do everything wrong lol. I think that was your point at least. Go on ahead and ride a roller coaster while you're at it.
Ok, I could give a hoot about football but somehow even I knew that reference. That scares me a little. Love da jokes, Sarah.
I understand the detachment, at least in the sense I get your logic. I think I'd feel the same way in your shoes. My friend who is pregnant now didn't truly believe she was until the heartbeat. Refused to tell anyone but me for a while. And didn't think about the baby at all until she found out the sex. She had quite a baby bump and wouldn't even talk about it. Sometimes things just don't feel real for people, and it all depends on what is comfortable for that person.
Good luck, and I'm hopeful that this time is successful.
Posted by: Sara at June 29, 2009 10:36 AM (uG01M)
31
Quietly happy and hopeful... :-) Makes sense to me. Sending prayers, too. Also hugs. :-)
Posted by: Krista at June 29, 2009 11:07 AM (5XpA4)
32
Wow, that is probably more a stunner to you than anyone else. Like everyone who reads you, I am very hopeful for you. Life is just full of surprises and some of them turn out to be very good.
I hate to tell you this but this same thing happened to my neighbors who never expected to get pregnant, had been married 15 years and WENT TO VEGAS (for a convention) and came back pregnant. Well, don't know where you were when it happened, but it happened and it's about time for you to beat the odds. That's my take anyway.
Posted by: Ruth H at June 29, 2009 02:06 PM (4u82p)
33
Here's hoping! I'm trying to imagine the look on your face when you saw the positive test.
Posted by: Mare at June 30, 2009 07:36 AM (HUa8I)
34
So I'm a little slow on the uptake - it's been a long month. I will remain hopefully happy for you and say many prayers that, in about 9 months you are miserably overdue.
I like Chuck's ideas - made me laugh.
Posted by: HomefrontSix at June 30, 2009 12:30 PM (7Qxzl)
35
Ditto to all~
YAY! I am very happy to hear this news!
Posted by: Allicadem at June 30, 2009 09:18 PM (U0Sq0)
36
Huzzah! That's
awesome. Funny how things sometimes happen like that.
I'm sending good thoughts your way.
Posted by: Adam at July 01, 2009 06:33 AM (hcSzf)
37
I was going to write something better, but...I understand the need to be detached. It took a long time for Greg and I to stop saying "if all goes right" with the last pregnancy and actually talking about a future. So, I am sending you good thoughts.
Posted by: Ann M. at July 01, 2009 10:28 PM (+GQ3g)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
June 26, 2009
DEPRESSED CHARLIE
Also, the dog is mad at me. Or depressed. Or scared. Something. Because he is not himself.
He supposedly had fun at the boarder. But he came home a tangled mess, so I immediately took him for a shave-down the next day. Maybe that was too much. Maybe dropping him off with strangers a second time set him over the edge.
He keeps doing this hacking thing, almost like a seizure. And he hasn't barked in two days. Normally he's perched in front of the window to bark at anything he sees, but not a peep since he's gotten home. He hides, and won't make eye contact.
Our dog has always been weird, but not like this.
Seriously, I want my Charlie back.
I'm never leaving him again.
Posted by: Sarah at
03:56 PM
| Comments (12)
| Add Comment
Post contains 130 words, total size 1 kb.
1
So you'll be taking him to work?
He's been switched!
Or maybe it's the same old Charlie but
you've been switched and he's waiting for the real Sarah to return from Vegas.
Seriously, the "hacking thing" sounds scary. As if you being sick weren't bad enough. I hope he - and you - recover soon.
Posted by: Amritas at June 26, 2009 05:06 PM (2eQQr)
2
Mamie does that as well. She doesn't like being separated from us for too long - especially not when she has to sleep in a kennel!
Ike doesn't appreciate it, but he's boarded enough that he takes it in stride. He used to sit on us and be glued to my leg when we brought him home, even if it was only an overnight!
One thing that has changed a lot about Ike is that he used to HATE the car. We had to corner him, grab him, and throw him in. Then we boarded him once. Then he realized the car meant he was going with us and not being left behind and now he loves to go for rides.
Dogs are weird.
Posted by: airforcewife at June 26, 2009 05:17 PM (NqbuI)
3
Is it possible he's got kennel cough? I believe that is something they have medication for. As for the not looking you in the eye . . . my dog used to do that after a haircut. It was like she was embarrassed about the new doo and she would hide for a few days until she got used to it. Seriously.
Hope all is back to normal soon!!
Posted by: rc at June 26, 2009 05:30 PM (89qJF)
4
RC -- That never crossed my mind because we got him vaccinated for it, but I suppose it's entirely possible. A reading of a few websites says it's something they can get even if vaccinated. I will keep an eye on him for phlegm/mucus/etc. Thanks for pointing that out.
Posted by: Sarah at June 26, 2009 07:45 PM (TWet1)
5
My dogs have come home before doing the hacking thing as well. At the time, my vet just told me to make sure they're drinking well and if it didn't resolve itself in about 4-5 days to come in. It did go away by itself. No fun at all, though. Hope Charlie's back to his old self soon!
Posted by: dutchgirl at June 26, 2009 08:23 PM (hLAkQ)
6
wait... aren't you also coughing?
Maybe it's sympathy coughing.
In all actuality, it's most likely kennel cough. No matter how much fun he had, he was
1. stressed, because he isn't used to being around other dogs
2. exposed to a whole host of other germs, bacteria, etc from those other dogs
3. IN a kennel (even if it was climate controlled) that exposed him to a different temperature, humidity, and dusts/pollens/allergens he isn't used to.
4. Plus, he's
tired. He's been playing his ass off for the last week. He needs a staycation.
Fluids and rest, he'll eat wen he feels better, don't push the issue (lots of treats if he is being picky). Baby him (more than usual) and he'll be his old self in a day or two.
I could bring Major over for a playdate if you like... you busy Saturday?
Posted by: Chuck at June 26, 2009 08:53 PM (aY7Ir)
7
Sarah, Chuck's points 1-4 could more or less apply to you too. Not that you were in a kennel, but you are stressed, you were exposed to germs, etc. in Las Vegas and the airport, you were exposed to a different climate, and you are tired. Staycate yourself too!
Posted by: Amritas at June 26, 2009 08:59 PM (2eQQr)
8
Yikes, I just realized all four of Chuck's points could also apply to
me and explain why I'm sick. My staycation is slowly helping me to recover.
Posted by: Amritas at June 26, 2009 09:07 PM (2eQQr)
9
If Charlie likes to bark, he may have barked a lot at the kennel and his throat is tired. Definitely would keep an eye on it, though! Poor little C-man.
Maybe he's just p-o'd he missed out on the saucy shows and bacon?
Posted by: Guard Wife at June 26, 2009 10:51 PM (UIGsI)
10
If he's hacking AND attacking his face with his paws, get him checked for a bad tooth or jaw infection.
Posted by: Oda Mae at June 27, 2009 01:01 AM (qTjVS)
11
Well, Obama is depressing.
Posted by: tim at June 29, 2009 07:58 AM (nno0f)
12
Poor little puppy boy, he looks so sad. He missed his mommy and daddy. And he may make you pay. Dogs are pretty good at that. But he also may have kennel cough. So like everyone else says, watch him closely.
We had two visitor puppies over the weekend, one old little one and one little young mini dachshund who has not been neutered. I wanted to do it myself because he just kept after my little lady Yorkie, who has been spayed, every single minute. My son in law finally swatted him with a newspaper he was reading. It didn't hurt him but got his attention and he let up a little. Of course that was two hours before they left. Our Sally had a bath first thing this morning because he would just grab her hair (it is more like hair than fur) in his mouth and pull her around the room, getting her all slobbery and dirty. But she enjoyed the running around and chasing they could do when outside. She is only 14 months old so she needs a playmate occasionally.
Posted by: Ruth H at June 29, 2009 01:57 PM (KLwh4)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
STARTED AT SPOUSEBUZZ BUT FINISHED HERE
My husband and I went on our much-anticipated vacation to "somewhere other than our parents' houses." We took
two whole suitcases and had the time of our life. My husband did a much better job of relaxing than he did
back in January. The vacation was perfect.
Until the last day.
And all of a sudden, I realized we were on Block Leave. I realized
that the end of this trip signaled the end of block leave, which means
July was coming soon, which means my husband is deploying.
My husband is deploying in like two weeks or so.
And I wanted the last day to slow down, to last forever, to never end.
But it did.
Right before the last deployment, I said
this:
I love having my husband home. I need to have my husband home
if we're ever going to successfully have a baby. But three years on, I
miss the deployment feelings. I miss the sense of connectedness, of
purpose, of conviction. It probably sounds strange, but I miss the
feeling of sacrifice, of knowing that I've given up being with someone
I love for the good of our country. Honestly, for me, the deployment
feeling hurts, but it's a good hurt, a deep and satisfying pain. And I
haven't felt it in three years. I feel ashamed that I've lived too ordinary of a life for three years.
I welcomed that last deployment. But this time, it just kinda seems too soon for me. It feels like he just got home. That coupled with my
lack of emotional investment in Afghanistan has made me unprepared for him to leave this time.
I can't believe he's leaving.
The IVF clinic called me while I was at SBL Utah at the end of May. I haven't called them back. I've been stalling. I don't really care right now. I don't want to think about it. I know I need to call them back and get the process moving, but I just don't want to.
I'm kinda incredulous about life these days. I can't believe what's happening to my self, to my family, to my country. It's like I'm in a bad dream that I can't shake.
I'm
being Dante again.
Posted by: Sarah at
09:30 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 379 words, total size 3 kb.
1
while not helpful, I think this makes total sense.
I expected you to say that your realization it was the last day and block leave was ending and the deployment was closing in was turning on your bitch switch. Because that is something I think I kinda do. As stupid as that is.
I hope these next few days are good and slow for you guys.
Posted by: wifeunit at June 26, 2009 10:38 AM (Y8fCw)
2
You know my husband doesn't get deployed or anything else these days but I do have a real quick bitch switch that I wish I didn't have. I've finally learned to control it somewhat unless I have a headache, the cut ants ate my plants, it is too hot, etc., etc.
Posted by: Ruth H at June 26, 2009 11:21 AM (4eLhB)
3
I'm years from deployments. Way back when, women weren't assigned to ships, so I didn't deploy, but my husband did. My feelings about deployments changed over the years. As brand new Ensigns, who had met during officer training, part of the worry was, will we still connect when we come back together? In the Navy, it was a real concern. Many other couples didn't make it over time. Later, we had the history together of knowing there'd be rough spots, but we got through them. When he was assigned to a carrier, he was gone for up to 7 months. The 6 months before a deployment were much harder than any other time. The ship would be in for a month, out for a month, in for 1 or 2 weeks, out for the same, until the deployment, plus overnight duty every 3 or 4 days. That was hard. I have the most trouble trying to balance the emotions of trying to get the most out of the time we were together, and the distance needed to survive when you are apart. Routines were impossible. This was true before children, then after as well. I'd want to sleep or do trivia or just plain avoid, but I'd want also to LIVE and take in just BEING with my husband while I could, and I couldn't do both, not very well anyway. I admit to being very glad when my husband had his last deployment. Our 2nd child was born on that last deployment. He met his son at age 3 months. We laugh about it now, me presenting him for approval, as if he could be sent back. That baby is now in the Navy with wife and child. The toughest time is always that limbo time with big events looming. In your vacation posts, my thoughts were, wow, this lady knows how to soak up the memories she'll need soon. I found UP to be a great movie, and one line stuck with me. It was made by the little boy Russell about his absent dad. 'It's the boring stuff I miss'. This deployment stuff stinks. I know. And, that carrier did go into harms way, at least by Cold War standards. There was a Syrian crisis and the ship turned around after it had started back home, extending the deployment, tough time for those of us waiting at home. Coffins were carried on board and were used every deployment. Flight decks are dangerous. I don't know how the danger will be for where your husband is going, but I do know that you have something I would have paid thousands for - the miracle of modern communication. Mail took "only" 10 days. There was no internet. We got phone calls in port, and they were at sea up to 4 or 5 months between port calls. I got 2 MARS ham radio calls that I cherish. The ship linked to ham operators, you'd get a collect call, and they'd patch you through to your husband. (No women on board remember). They calls wouldn't last more than 3 minutes and only one way communication, so you had to say 'over' to let the other person know they could speak. My husband was notified by a 2 sentence Red Cross telegram, which was transmitted as a short Navy message to let him know his child birth date and time, and that it was a boy, his size, weight and that he and I were both healthy. You've shown more wisdom to date than I did. I isolated myself more. You've built a social support system. It's tough, but you've made what you need to tough it out as the one who waits while the other deploys.
Posted by: HChambers at June 26, 2009 03:42 PM (YpVpF)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
FULLY CONVINCED?
When you don't have children, you spend a lot of time convincing yourself of all the silver linings about not having children. For example, you can go to Vegas for a week and watch naughty shows and do whatever you want. And when you're sick, as I have been since we got home, you can sleep until 9:00 and take naps in the afternoon and remind yourself that it would be so much worse to be sick and have to take care of children.
And I've done such a darned good job of convincing myself of all the silver linings that I am afraid I might have trouble switching my brain back someday...
Posted by: Sarah at
08:35 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 115 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Last time we were down here, my 4 year old daughter came into the room and woke us up.
"I feel like I am sick in my tummy."
(She'd been a hypochondriac for a few months)
"Fine. Go ahead and throw up."
We'd just gotten in the night prior, after driving from KS to PA, staying in a hotel for a week with the kids while house hunting, and generally being driven nuts by both of them for the last two weeks. We were
tired.
The next thing we hear: the sound of a little girl retching on the carpet, right where she stood.
Nothing like being dog-tired and having to get out of bed and clean up vomit.
Posted by: Chuck at June 26, 2009 11:31 AM (aY7Ir)
2
I do the exact same thing about having just one child instead of two (or three, or whatever). As far as going from none to one, for me it so quickly became the new normal that the old life seems like it belonged to someone else.
Posted by: dutchgirl at June 26, 2009 08:29 PM (hLAkQ)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
June 24, 2009
PERMANENT PUPPY
When we dropped Charlie off at the boarder a week ago, the lady squealed and asked how old he is. "Wait, you mean he's not a puppy? You mean he's going to look like this
forever?" she exclaimed. Apparently everyone all week kept asking about the cute golden "puppy," which has prompted my husband to
riff off of CVG and keep saying our dog is Permanent Puppy.
They told us another story when we picked Charlie up that keeps making me smile. Charlie is deathly afraid of water. He hates it and won't go near it. The boarder put out plastic kiddie pools for the dogs to frolic in, and apparently Charlie desperately wanted to play with the other dogs but was immobilized by his fear of water. She said he would just run in circles around the plastic pool while all the other dogs were in it in the water. So they came up with a solution: they got another plastic pool and set it up beside the first...empty. Apparently Charlie frolicked and played in an imaginary pool all week beside the other dogs. Which really tickles me.
We're all back together again at home. About two or three more weeks before the husband deploys...
Posted by: Sarah at
10:14 AM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 208 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I love that story about the paddling pools! How nice of them to accommodate Charlie's needs.
That's the sign of dog people if I ever heard it!
I'm glad he had fun!
Oh. Glad you had fun too.
Posted by: Guard Wife at June 24, 2009 01:17 PM (qk9Ip)
2
That is just too cute. I'm glad they used some real doggy lover skills on the problem.
Posted by: Ruth H at June 24, 2009 01:47 PM (4u82p)
3
Charlie the Permanent Puppy is Chuck Everlasting! As AWTM noticed,
you perpetually look fifteen, so agelessness runs in the family. And Chuck E (not to be confused with Chuck Z or Chuck D of Public Enemy) even shares your aversion to water (
#29 on this list). Species, schmecies, you're obviously related!
I wonder if any of the other dogs joined CE in the empty pool.
Having only met CE all grown up, it's hard for me to believe that
he really was a puppy four years ago.
Posted by: Amritas at June 24, 2009 03:44 PM (2eQQr)
4
DH says sounds like a good boarder, if they placated a dogs fear of water...
Posted by: awtm at June 24, 2009 07:23 PM (NuDbL)
5
Lol. I think Charlie and Daisy would get along really well. Every time I go to the dog park I get asked how old she is; she's on the small side for a beagle, so everyone thinks she's still a puppy, even though she's 2 years old now. And she is also afraid of water. She hates the sprinkler, she runs if I turn on the hose. She's gotten to the point where she'll stand still for a bath, but that's about it. At least I don't have to worry about her getting muddy at the dog park.
Posted by: Leofwende at June 28, 2009 01:54 PM (28CBm)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
June 23, 2009
GOLF MEANS YOU'RE SMART...UNLESS YOU'RE BUSH
Media Cheer Obama's Golf Outings; Criticized Republicans' Trips to Course contrasts the press' fawning over Obama's golf hobby to Bush's.
Gag.
The original article quoted, "Just the sport for a leader most driven," is sickeningly praiseworthy. Bush is a golfer too, but I don't remember him ever being praised with these compliments:
Posted by: Sarah at
01:59 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 227 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Everything Obama dOes is of cOsmic significance. When Bushaitan golfed, he was just a brute with a club. But when the One gOlfs ... ah, he is the cOmmander of the cOurse, the Titan of the Tee, the Paragon of Putting.
According to
The Washington Post,Obama's predecessor said he quit golfing just as the Iraqi insurgency
began to escalate in August 2003. "I don't want some mom whose son may
have recently died to see the commander in chief playing golf," George
W. Bush told interviewers in 2008. "I think, you know, playing golf
during a war just sends the wrong signal."Whereas Obama, the cOOlest man on Earth, doesn't let a mere war shake up his rOutine:
He's hit the course five times since late April -- rushing out to the
links on Sunday afternoon just 90 minutes after returning to the White
House from his overseas trip.Such firmness of spirit is unknown to Bushaitan. Be like Barack!
Posted by: kevin at June 23, 2009 05:27 PM (2eQQr)
2
My favorite quote from the
Post story at standard.net:
Says sportswriting legend Dan Jenkins, who's seen a lot of golf in his
time: "I certainly don't want my president to be a good golfer. It
takes too much time and practice to be any good -- it's a very hard
game to play consistently well. I think there are better things he
could be doing."What would Bunker say?
(PS: Is anyone else bugged by the little SNL icon at standard.net? It makes me think of
Saturday Night Live, though there's nothing funny about this story or the site.)
Posted by: Amritas at June 23, 2009 05:34 PM (2eQQr)
3
I'm not really into O-bashing because I think it makes us seem as bad as the other side. But....here is what I found really disturbing about the article:
"Obama golfed on May 25 after he spoke and placed a wreath at the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier in Arlington Cemetery on Memorial Day. Presidential aides told the media that Obama observed a moment of silence at 3 p.m. while on the links."
If I were one of the POTUS advisers I would have made damn sure that there was an all day schedule of events including military members and their families on Memorial Day. If he has to play golf then he should have included some soldiers in his outing.
Not saying he doesn't have a right to play a nice game every once in a while, but it seems like he does it an awful lot. I've played, 18 holes take a long time. He is fiddling while Rome burns.
Posted by: Mare at June 24, 2009 07:46 AM (HUa8I)
4
Mare, I really don't care if Obama golfs or not. He's human; he needs diversions. What bugs me is how the prOpaganda machine spins it. When Bush stopped golfing, it was obviously a baaaad thing:
"That's his idea of sacrifice, to give up golf?"(It may not have been "his idea". He may have given up in response to public demands. Perhaps the same public offended by Bush golfing doesn't mind Obama golfing.)
Posted by: Amritas at June 24, 2009 03:56 PM (2eQQr)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
LACK OF OPTIONS
I have always been frustrated by my lack of options. If you wish for the United States to look more like Canada or Europe, then please just move to Canada or Europe. Don't try to turn our country into something that already exists elsewhere. Because if I want the United States to look more like what the Founding Fathers envisioned, with far less government intrusion, I have nowhere else to go. There is no other existing country that matches the vision of where I want to live. (And the US today ain't exactly it either, but it's the best we've got.) Please don't turn my only option into another Canada. Canada is already Canada.
Stephen Green: Once Upon a Time in America
Whatever liberty we have right here, right now, in America … well, for all practical purposes, that’s all that’s left anywhere. If France had our freedoms, there would be no French here. If China had it, there would be no Chinese here. If it existed in Latin America, there would be no Spanish spoken here. And so it goes.
And so if we, here in America, throw it all away in a fit of panic or pique, then what we once called “America†will become as false as a fairy tale.
Posted by: Sarah at
09:32 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 216 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I feel the same way. I used to idolize Japan until I actually lived there. It's taken me a long time to appreciate America. Now I'll never leave. The gulch is here ... somewhere.
Green thinks people come here because of freedom. I would say they are mostly coming here because of the byproducts of freedom, not freedom itself. The biggest magnet is money - and the material comfort it can buy. Capitalism makes this wealth possible, but this fact eludes the immigrants who come here to get rich and elect Leftists. Very, very few immigrants come here because they loved reading the Constitution in their countries of origin. Even the politically minded may be more interested in using America as a temporary base of operations for dissident activities to liberate their people back home. Ayn Rand was highly atypical; once she came to the US, she never looked back (with the exception of her novel
We the Living).Immigrants in the past were no different. My ancestors had no idea what 'freedom' was. But they did understand money, and they came to Hawaii to earn it.
The difference lies in America's elite which has turned faux self-criticism into a sport. Nowadays Immigrants and the American-born alike are told what an eeeevil empire America is. (And they should take some responsibility for actually believing this nonsense.) Why should immigrants assimilate to such a horrible place when they can just take the goodies and vote for more supposed 'freebies'? They're not new Americans anymore; they're just new victim classes taught to demand their special rights.
Failure permeates American society, but the stench starts at the top.
Posted by: Amritas at June 24, 2009 12:52 AM (2eQQr)
2
I forgot to link to
Kim du Toit's classic post on this subject:
We have nowhere else to go.
Lefties have lots of options. They can move to Canada, or to France, or
to other socialist paradises. Sadly, though, they don’t—preferring to
try to replicate those
horrible experiments here, until one day, if Toren’s prognosis is
correct, we will be no different from Europe, or any of the other
statist countries.
Okay, let me make this more personal.
I have nowhere else to go.
Like Toren, I once changed countries to start a better life for
myself; unlike Toren, I don’t have somewhere else to go to now, and I
have no investments to fund a move (anymore).
This is where I am, and this is where I’ll have to stay.
Why do Leftists stay? As hard as this may be to swallow, patriotism may be part of the answer. They love America - in their own way - and want to remold it into their ideal image. But the more cynical may suggest a simpler answer: inertia. Why move to Cuba when you have a big house, a big TV, a big SUV, and everything in your language right here? How much do they really value free health care? Not enough to learn Spanish and live under Fidel. They may not like the eeeevil American empire, but they do like
America the luxury mansion, though they'd
love it if only it had a few more amenities ... at our expense.
Inertia is powerful. If you told me today that you had founded the Gulch and invited me to join you, would I instantly drop everything and go? Or would I hesitate and ask myself, is the world outside the gulch that bad?
How bad will things have to get before we are willing to flee to the Gulch?
Posted by: Amritas at June 24, 2009 01:18 AM (2eQQr)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
June 22, 2009
I WISH I COULD THINK OF A GOOD JOKE USING "CHUCK" AND "POLE POSITION"
The other day the hotel phone rang. My husband answered and started chatting, and I figured it was his dad calling. After a while, I started to think it maybe wasn't his dad but I couldn't figure out who it could be.
It was
Chuck Z.
Chuck had decided to do something nice for us while we were here in Vegas, something he would like to do if he were here. He wanted to get us races at
Pole Position, the indoor go-kart raceway.
Totally unexpected and cool.
Also it was funny to hear my husband talking on the phone with Chuck like they've known each other for a while, when they've never actually met. Although my husband does call Chuck my "internet boyfriend," so I guess that makes them practically related.
So today we went to Pole Position. I assumed Chuck had gotten us one race, but no, he had sprung for two races and t-shirts for both of us as well! I felt bad about him doing so much for us, but it turned out to be a good thing to have two races.
The race consists of nine laps in a car that goes up to 45 mph. Your first lap is a practice lap to get you oriented, and then they kick the cars up to high gear and you're off. Only my car didn't respond. I was flooring my gas pedal and people were passing me on straightaways. I didn't get why 45 mph seemed so sluggish. Then all of a sudden on the fifth lap, my car leapt into gear! I jerked forward and nearly crashed into a wall. I realized my car had been goofed up.
Luckily I had a second race to redeem myself. I decided to consider the first race a practice shot to learn the curves and not feel so nervous, because I was in fact terrified that I would crash, or cause a crash, or hit someone, or overall make a fool of myself. So one slow race in the beginning was a blessing in disguise. And my second fast race was fun!
Chuck (and Mrs Z), thank you for treating us to a fun activity that we misers wouldn't have done on our own. We had a great time, and you really shouldn't have. We hope to make it up to you with dinner when you pass through town on your PCS journey.
And we're throwing a little change in the Valour-IT pot for good measure.
Chuck is one heck of an internet boyfriend.
And I can't even say how wholeheartedly I wish him a
Happy Alive Day...
Posted by: Sarah at
05:55 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 454 words, total size 3 kb.
1
Nice helmet and I'm glad you are having such a blast! God bless internet boyfriends!
Posted by: Darla at June 22, 2009 07:10 PM (LP4DK)
2
that sounds fun! I would be totally into that.
Posted by: wifeunit at June 22, 2009 07:48 PM (t5K2U)
3
That's an amazing gift! I wish I could see video footage of you and your husband in action!
Has Chuck Z gone to Pole Position?
The name makes me think of the
old cartoon. (I've never played the video game.)
Posted by: Amritas at June 23, 2009 12:57 AM (2eQQr)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
June 21, 2009
VEGAS PHOTOS
We played this penny slot game two days ago because we thought it was LOL cats funny. But this kitteh was not funny.
AWTM did not believe me when I said I took the worst picture of my entire life yesterday at Hoover Dam. For real, I did. Every time I look at it, I die laughing. It is so hideous; I have no idea how it happened and I sincerely hope that I never ever look like that during the course of a normal day. I blame the sun.
And because I am a blogger who strives to strike the perfect balance between narcissism and self-deprecation, I am going to share it with you. It is too funny not to.
My husband was scrolling through the pics on the camera and stopped at this one, traced a circle around my face with his finger, and said aloud, "Area of concern."
Photo after the jump, because it needs to come at you like shock and awe.
more...
Posted by: Sarah at
10:46 PM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
Post contains 175 words, total size 1 kb.
1
It is? My reaction was, that's it? That's the picture?
Honestly, I didn't laugh.
I don't think there could be a bad picture of you.
Bad sun! I hope you've been wearing protection.
Posted by: Amritas at June 22, 2009 05:03 AM (2eQQr)
2
ha...not that AREA of CONCERNY
seriously.
Posted by: awtm at June 22, 2009 07:20 AM (NuDbL)
3
That is funny cute! So the sun was very bright, you just can't hide that cuteness. If that is the worst picture evah you are truly blessed.
I may be as biased as your mother and grandmother on that;D
Posted by: Ruth H at June 22, 2009 07:34 AM (4u82p)
4
Were you mimicking all your bus-bound traveling companions? You SO need to make that into an avatar, or figure a way to get it on your id card...
Posted by: Chuck at June 22, 2009 10:35 AM (meX2d)
5
You do not look like this routinely. Take, for instance, that photo from M2's birthday party where there was SO MUCH sun and we both avoided squinting (and now have the burned retinas to show for it).
I loved the kitty slot photo. That made me laugh more than the Hoover Dam photo for two reasons. 1) I said kitty slot in my head and 2) the editorial comments on the photo made me laugh.
Posted by: Guard Wife at June 22, 2009 10:35 AM (qk9Ip)
6
That's awesome! And that's why we like ya ... ya share the good and the bad!
Posted by: Darla at June 22, 2009 07:11 PM (LP4DK)
7
I would not have recognized you from that photo.
Posted by: Sig at June 23, 2009 10:06 PM (ekWzF)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
GRAN CANYON
So there we were...
I hate that I have to type this story. I wish I could tell it to you in person, with wide eyes and lots of expletives.
We took a bus tour to the Grand Canyon yesterday. And as happened when we
went on a cruise, my husband and I remembered why we don't like being trapped with strangers.
Since it was a long drive to and fro, we watched movies on the charter bus. There were a couple of kids on the tour, so the bus driver insisted we watch appropriate movies. On the way there, we watched
Marley and Me and
Evan Almighty. You get the idea: family movies. And on the way back, this lady...
Wait, let me back up.
My husband and I were the first people on the bus, and we accidentally picked the worst seats. On a tour of polite Japanese and snoozing Italian tourists, we happened to sit behind the most hoopleheaded, annoying, creepy American family. I can't even do their annoyingness justice; it was just one of those situations where you find yourself unwittingly eavesdropping on their inane chatter for fifteen hours because
they just won't shut up.
It was going to be a toss-up over whether the mom or the dad was the more annoying, but then the mom made a shocking leap into first place.
On the way back, the mom volunteered to choose the movie we'd watch. And on a bus filled with Asians and black people, this lady picked out
Gran Torino.
I am crapping you negative.
Here's how it played out. Keep in mind that this conversation is being shouted the length of the bus, with the lady up front at the DVD player and me about 2/3 of the way back:
Lady: I really want to see
Gran Torino.
Sarah: Nooohooohoo. Not a good idea.
Lady: But I want to see it!
Sarah: It's not really, ahem, socially appropriate for this setting. It's very controversial.
Lady: Well, what else do you want to see? No suggestions? Then let's watch
Gran Torino.
Now I am starting to lose my cool and get knots in my stomach. There is no way we can put that movie in on a bus full of minorities. (My husband wondered if the Japanese people would even catch the "zipperheads" and "gooks." I said perhaps not, but
everyone knows the n-word when they hear it.)
Meanwhile, I am trying to insist to the lady's husband that we simply cannot watch the movie. I tried so hard to be diplomatic, saying that while it is an interesting movie to watch and discuss, this was just not the right time and place. When the lady returns to her seat, her husband says maybe we should pick something else. The lady starts pouting. Finally, I lost it and said, "Whatever. I'm glad you're comfortable playing a movie filled with the n-word." Then the black ladies next to us start to get involved. I swear one of them went all Bon Qui Qui and muttered that she would cut her.
Thank heavens someone else must've told the bus driver the deal, because by the time I marched down the aisle to insist that the movie was absolutely unacceptable, he had already figured out the gist and put the kibosh on it.
But seriously, oh my lord. I about died.
My husband and I spent the rest of the trip giggling about other movies that we could suggest to watch:
American History X, Crash, Deliverance, Pulp Fiction, and (the LOL suggestion from the husband)
Brown Bunny.
We may as well have suggested porn. It might've been less uncomfortable on a bus full of Asian strangers than
Gran Torino.
I hope this lady goes home, rents the movie, and then realizes what she almost did and feels like crap.
No more group tours for the Grok family. We're flying solo from now on.
Posted by: Sarah at
02:15 PM
| Comments (9)
| Add Comment
Post contains 659 words, total size 4 kb.
1
sounds like fun ;-)
Glad you stood up to the moron. And at least the husband didn't just support his poor persecuted wife being picked on by the power tripping movie critic.
Posted by: wifeunit at June 21, 2009 03:25 PM (t5K2U)
2
What I don't understand is ... why was a
Gran Torino DVD on the bus in the first place? Did this woman bring it with her?
I was surprised that
Pulp Fiction was among the available choices for movies on my flight today. My neighbor was watching it. (Every seat has its own video player.) But I should have figured, since I was sitting behind someone playing
Kill Bill on last week's flight.
I love the pun in your title!
Posted by: Amritas at June 21, 2009 04:07 PM (2eQQr)
3
That makes sense. I guess I just don't see Gran Torino in the same light as those other movies.
Posted by: Beth at June 21, 2009 04:47 PM (0FZs/)
4
And I'd have sat there silently and let the nitwit put the movie in. It'd have been much more fun to watch her be mortified, and maybe she'd have shut up.
Posted by: Chuck at June 21, 2009 04:55 PM (meX2d)
5
Last night after chatting with you, i shared the story, and we all got a good chuckle out of it...
We have been married for a LONG while, and do not do group things, never have as a rule. I can barely stand to be surrounded by hoopleheads in Walmart, or a movie theater...
Posted by: awtm at June 21, 2009 05:19 PM (NuDbL)
6
I'm with Amritas on this one, what in the world are they considering "family friendly?" Good for you for standing up. Yeah, and I did wonder why you left the d off Grand when I saw that title.
Posted by: Ruth H at June 21, 2009 05:19 PM (KLwh4)
7
I don't understand why the movie was so horribly inappropriate. I would understand if you were objecting to the language or violence due to children. But to be worried that minorities would be offended I'm not sure I get. I thought it was a wonderful movie about getting beyond stereotypes and such. I would have been more than interested in watching that movie in that setting.
Posted by: Beth at June 21, 2009 05:26 PM (0FZs/)
8
Beth -- By all means, I am willing to watch
Gran Torino with people of any race who choose to watch that movie. But the key word there is CHOOSE. If you are trapped on a bus with no way to avoid a controversial movie, I think that's terrible. It's not even like an airplane where you don't have to plug your earphones in; the sound is piped through the whole bus. (And that movie would never be shown on an airplane.) The point that horrified me was that people might be forced to watch a controversial movie that they just don't want to see. I would've been equally pissed if they'd chosen
Fahrenheit 9/11 or
Religulous or
Expelled (OK, maybe not *equally*...) just because I don't think controversial movies are appropriate for situations where people are forced to watch.
Posted by: Sarah at June 21, 2009 05:40 PM (JJVbW)
9
Wait - so the bus driver was worried about the kids on the bus THERE, but not BACK? SRSLY?
What exactly was this "family friendly" criteria that Gran Torino fit?
Perhaps that wife would have appreciated a showing of White Man's Burden.
Posted by: airforcewife at June 21, 2009 06:26 PM (NqbuI)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
June 19, 2009
LIFE AS A BLOGGER
You know you're a blogging family when your husband points at something on vacation and says you should take a photo of it and circle the Area Of Concern.
Dude, there are so many areas of concern in Vegas it's not even funny.
(Hat tip to
Rachel Lucas for introducing a new term into our lexicon.)
Posted by: Sarah at
04:50 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 60 words, total size 1 kb.
1
My daughter and one of my nieces and I are regular readers of Rachel Lucas. My niece married a Scotsman and lived in Scotland for about 5 years so she really know where Rachel is coming from in her blog since the move. My niece sent me a postcard when she first arrived and said "everything here is quaint."
But, on point, we all know the meaning of the phrase and its use. I thought it when I looked at something (can't remember what though) just yesterday. I guess at my age areas of concern don't last too long. lol
Posted by: Ruth H at June 20, 2009 01:09 AM (KLwh4)
2
Bwah areas of concern is right!!!
Posted by: awtm at June 20, 2009 03:53 AM (NuDbL)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
WTF "SUPREME LEADER"
Krauthammer on Iran:
Then, after treating this popular revolution as an inconvenience to the
real business of Obama-Khamenei negotiations, the president speaks
favorably of "some initial reaction from the Supreme Leader that
indicates he understands the Iranian people have deep concerns about
the election."
Where to begin? "Supreme Leader"? Note the abject solicitousness
with which the American president confers this honorific on a clerical
dictator who, even as his minions attack demonstrators, offers to
examine some returns in some electoral districts -- a farcical fix that
will do nothing to alter the fraudulence of the election.
Moreover, this incipient revolution is no longer about the election.
Obama totally misses the point. The election allowed the political
space and provided the spark for the eruption of anti-regime fervor
that has been simmering for years and awaiting its moment. But people
aren't dying in the street because they want a recount of hanging chads
in suburban Isfahan. They want to bring down the tyrannical,
misogynist, corrupt theocracy that has imposed itself with the very
baton-wielding goons that today attack the demonstrators.
This started out about election fraud. But like all revolutions, it
has far outgrown its origins. What's at stake now is the very
legitimacy of this regime -- and the future of the entire Middle East.
This revolution will end either as a Tiananmen (a hot Tiananmen with
massive and bloody repression or a cold Tiananmen with a finer mix of
brutality and co-optation) or as a true revolution that brings down the
Islamic Republic.
The latter is improbable but, for the first time in 30 years, not impossible.
(via
UpNorthMommy)
Posted by: Sarah at
04:09 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 273 words, total size 2 kb.
1
I never thought I'd be defending Obama - especially after my last comment! - but I don't see anything wrong with calling Khamenei the Supreme Leader. That is the common translation of his title, after all. If he had a different title and Obama described him as a "supreme leader", then I would be upset. But only a bit.
Supreme Leader sounds evil to me and is a reminder of the sad state of Iran. It's not a term I'd use to indicate respect toward a head of state, though I imagine Obama's speechwriter was simply using the title without a second thought. What should Obama have said? "So-called Supreme Leader - snort"? If Bush-haters could force themselves to say "President Bush", I think opponents of "the tyrannical,
misogynist, corrupt theocracy" can say "Supreme Leader". The rest of that line of Obama's about the SL's alleged understanding is so much worse than a title I would have used anyway.
Posted by: Amritas at June 20, 2009 09:25 PM (/IwHi)
2
I forgot to add this quote by Andrew McCarthy:
http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=ZTgxNzYwZDM5NGQ3MzAyZDZmZmZiYWY1NTQ1YTFjMTA=
"But for a few nettlesome differences (like equality for women
and hostility to homosexuals), the Islamic political program —
especially the totalitarian version regnant in the Islamic Republic of
Iran — is something the American Left would be very comfortable with.
Obama understands this, and I think it is a better explanation for his
solicitude toward Khamenei than any hope of reversing Iran's nuclear
ambitions."
I'd like to see him expand on that point, as it's too easy to associate our enemies (the Iranian regime) with whatever angers us (Obama) even if there is no real connection.
Posted by: Amritas at June 20, 2009 09:56 PM (/IwHi)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
NEW AFGHAN STRATEGY (NOT A KNITTING POST)
Via CaliValleyGirl a few weeks ago when I first started this post:
New U.S. Afghan strategy will cost billions, take yearsI'm sorry, but I've just never bought into the idea that Afghanistan is the "good war." My husband has actually had someone say to him that at least his upcoming deployment is to Afghanistan, which serves a purpose and has meaning, unlike Iraq. I wholeheartedly reject that idea. I also disagree vehemently with Pres Obama when he
said, "Unlike Afghanistan, Iraq was a war of choice..." As Neal Boortz said recently, all wars are a choice. None of the 9/11 hijackers came from Afghanistan, so please explain to me how Afghanistan wasn't a
choice that was made.
I've been thinking about Afghanistan a lot lately, and I have a hard time feeling good about my husband going there. Frankly, I am not convinced that country deserves his effort.
Ralph Peters:
[Petraeus] doesn't seem to grasp that, while al Qaeda was a foreign and
ultimately unwanted presence in Iraq, the Taliban's the home team in
Afghanistan. Afghan tribesmen just don't share our interests. And
Iraq's a state. Afghanistan's an accident.
We'd need hundreds of thousands of troops and decades of commitment
to attempt to nation-build where there's no nation to build.
Interestingly enough, my husband said the exact same thing this morning when I said I wanted to work on my Afghanistan post. Iraq had a history of being governed; Afghanistan doesn't. So what is our goal?
This very thing was discussed on the final panel at the Milblogs Conference this year.
Bill Roggio,
Andrew Exum, and
Bill Nagle all kinda shrugged their shoulders and expressed an inability to decipher what the Obama administration's end goal is in Afghanistan. Even if you disagree with the shifting goals in Iraq, at least most people can articulate what they were: finding WMDs, bringing democracy, leaving Iraq with some sort of intact system of government. Can the layman come up with any proposed goal in Afghanistan? I can't, other than, um, kill al Qaeda?
And maybe that in itself is the goal. It is according to Ralph Peters:
Getting it right in Afghanistan -- and across the frontier in Pakistan
-- means digging fewer wells and forcing our enemies to dig more graves.
But when does it end? Americans squawked that we had no "exit strategy" in Iraq, but holy cow, what is the exit strategy for a war of attrition? Then you're in GEN LeMay territory: "If you kill enough of them, they stop fighting." Do we stay in Afghanistan until every terrorist is dead? I don't think that is really a true goal, certainly not an attainable one.
And I don't even think that is the Obama goal, otherwise he would not be doing
this:
President Barack Obama's choice to take charge of the war in Afghanistan Tuesday called "significant growth" of the Afghan army and national
police the key to his strategy, but the annual cost of building and
maintaining the existing Afghan force is more than four times larger
than the entire Afghan economy.
[...]
"We are building an army they will never be able to afford," a senior U.S. military official told McClatchy.
I am by no means smart about these things. But it seems to me that we Americans are being naive about Afghanistan, even more naive than we were in Iraq.
This
Michael Scheuer excerpt (via Amritas) rings true and worries me:
At this point we again run into one of those quaint and always-wrong
assumptions that the West operates on when it intervenes in a Muslim
country. Whether in Washington, London, or The Hague, the most basic
assumption of nation-building is that if poor, illiterate, unhealthy
Muslims are given potable water, schooling, prenatal care, and voting
booths, they will abandon their faith, love Israel, demand visits by
Saiman Rushdie, and encourage their daughters to be feminist with a
moral sense alien to most of the Islamic world--that is, they will try
to become Europeans.
This, of course, has never occurred in the wake of a Western
intervention in a Muslim country. Islam invariably becomes more, not
less, important to the inhabitants of an invaded Muslim country, and
while improvements in water, disease resistance, and schoolbooks are
appreciated, they are not religiously transforming. We simply end up
with Muslims who are better educated, healthier, and more militantly
Islamic. This has happened in countries (Somalia, Afghanistan, Iraq,
and several of the Balkan states) and in prison camps; in Guantanamo
Bay, for example, we are building a truly dedicated and virulently
anti-U.S. mujahedin battalion, the members of which will have the
best-cared-for teeth in the Islamic world. But through it all, U.S. and
Western leaders, the UN, and untold numbers of NGO spokespersons
continue to sell shopworn lies to Western electorates-that
nation-building will yield secularists who will desire only to live in
peace with their Western conquerors.
I think we project too much onto a people and culture we simply cannot grok. Our American mantra that all men desire to be free may just not apply. (Read
The Places In Between if you want to be horrified by the Afghan midset.) And eight years into this clash, we still are making monumental and basic mistakes, even at the highest levels: US envoy Holbrooke just made an
enormous cultural faux-pas. Afghanistan bloggers caught the gaff and flipped out; how is
the "Special Representative for Afghanistan and Pakistan under the Obama administration" making such mistakes while bloggers know better? (To echo
J.G. Thayer and my husband, please show us that "smart diplomacy" and distinguish yourself from yokel Bush whenever you're ready.) How is it that my husband has arguments at work about the definitions of counter-terrorism and counter-insurgency, with the very people who are supposed to know the difference and carry it out? How can "experts" still be so under-educated and naive about something that's been going on for eight years?
I am murky about what I should hope for in Afghanistan. What are the benchmarks? What does success look like? What is my husband's role?
And how long will this take?
Steven den Beste a few days after 9/11: "The progress and spread of freedom worldwide will continue;
this war
won't end for centuries." [emphasis mine, because the enormity of that thought is horrifying]
I find the whole thing quite stressful, and I am not ready to send my husband to Afghanistan. I personally thought Iraq was the battle of the long war I could get behind. I am having a harder time working up the emotional investment this milspouse needs to send her husband off to fight.
I am not ready for my husband to join a new front in a war that won't end for centuries.
UPDATED:
I meant to add this originally and forgot. I just wanted to put links to the blogs my husband's been reading that cover Afghanistan-related issues:
Registan.netGhosts of AlexanderSmall Wars JournalThe Long War JournalI probably need to start reading them too.
Posted by: Sarah at
11:44 AM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
Post contains 1169 words, total size 9 kb.
1
I linked here from the Castle. This past week, I had the pleasure of meeting a Major who flies Blackhawks and was working with the command staff in Afghanistan. She told me something that gave me a whole new perspective on war, especially the one in Afghanistan. In a nutshell, it is not about killing the enemy but raising their sights. Their standard of living. Their ability to have for themselves and their country what other western countries have. To reject terrorism as being self-defeating of attaining those goals. While we have always had that as part of the 'hearts and minds' approach, in Afghanistan it means that literacy is a big part of changing those minds and hearts.
It could take years, but if they can read and think for themselves early on, it won't take as long. I just wish that I could remember everything she (this major) told me, but I went away from that conversation thinking that we are on the right track because it is working, but instead of taking a generation, it will be less than that, and by that time, two generations will be affected.
As Americans, we tend to want instant gratification because we are sort of hard-wired that way. We forget that the Middle East is essentially not that way because of religion, culture and the tribes.
Anyway, excellent post and thought-provoking.
Posted by: Cricket at June 20, 2009 12:41 PM (odsR+)
2
I also came over at the behest of The Armorer. More preamble, I may come off as inna you face, but I shouldn't be taken that way. I just don't pretty up my words very well, and I appologize for that.
I remember quite well why we are in Afghanistan: to end the Taliban rule and other gov'ts of that country that would provide safe haven to trans national groups that would attack the US or other liberal democracies. That necessitated much of the same slate as for Iraq, sans the WMD issue.
I've often said that COL Peters comes from teh 'kill 'em all, who cares if they get sorted' school of thought, and that for every job there exists a proper tool. COL Peters and his ilk aren't the right tool for this job. HIC? Sure, LIC? Oh, hell no.
Scheuer does not ring true to me. He makes a broken analogy. In the past policy was governed, mostly, by the need to counter the USSR and Int'l communism. Which had disasterous effects on what was done in the ME. Things like support right wing jagoffs longer than was wise becuase we needed them to counter soclialist revolutionaries like those who took over Iran. Now is different. I don't know about the effect of 'smart diplomacy' but I do know that things that were done wrong, out of necessity, back when I was a kid are not necessity now. Such as remaining :eviathan in terms of military, we can now tool down to LIC and MOOTW---and do it right--- because there's no near peer competitor. We don't HAVE to ally ourselves with the likes of Noriega, Marcos, Pinochet, Mubarak, and Rhee---authortarian jagoffs who abused the people and made a great swatch of anti-americanism in their nations because we supported them---and can now take actions aimed primarily at what's best for where we're acting instead of some broader context.
THe same type of thing, the 'it creates more hardcore followers', can be said about the mob. There does exist an inflection point where you aren't creating more of x by acting. It's a long, hard, tear filled slog to point. BUt it's a road once set upon turning off of leaves a greater problem than staying on(see Somalia, et all in his list, where we ended our commitments and things went kablooie).
I pray that we'll see our loved ones come out of this healthy and whole. I don't think God listens to me much, but I'll add what weight I can in Him looking after yours. Take care.
Posted by: ry at June 20, 2009 09:57 PM (QXUfZ)
3
I honestly did try to have there be seperate paragraphs in there. REally, I did. DOn't know why it came out a hash. Sorry.
Posted by: ry at June 20, 2009 10:01 PM (QXUfZ)
4
Thanks, Sarah. This post was well worth the wait!
I could go on and on, but I have to go to breakfast, and then the airport, so for now, I'll just respond to Cricket. Given the failure of government programs to uplift Americans in America, would a gigantic multi-generational American government uplift program have a chance to succeed in a foreign country? I'm pretty sure the answer is no. Maybe a new Iran is the best hope for a better Afghanistan. More later.
Posted by: Amritas at June 20, 2009 10:03 PM (/IwHi)
5
"Do you hate me, Lady? ... Were I you I would."
"I will never tell the city why I appointed these three hundred. I will never tell the Three Hundred themselves. But I now tell you.
"I chose them not for their own valor, lady, but for that of their women...
"Greece stands now on her most perilous hour. If she saves herself, it will not be at the Gates ...but later, in battles yet to come, by land and sea.Then Greece, if the gods will it, will preserve herself...
"When the battle is over, when the 300 have gone down to death, then will all Greece look to the Spartans, to see how they bear it.
"But who, ladies, who will the Spartans look to? To you. To you and the other wives and mothers, sisters and daughters of the fallen.
"If they behold your hearts riven and broken with grief, they too will break. And Greece will break with them. But if you bear up, dry-eyed, not alone enduring your loss but seizing it with contempt for it's agony and embracing it as the honor that it is in truth, then Sparta will stand and all Hellas will stand behind her.
"Why have I nominated you, lady, to bear up beneath this most terrible of trials, you and your sisters of the Three Hundred? Because you can."
- Leonidas, in Stephen Pressfield's
Gates of Fire.
Posted by: Greyhawk at June 20, 2009 10:25 PM (/tYJS)
6
I think that the fundamental difference between Iraq and Afghanistan is the fact the Iraq, for good or ill, had a working infrastructure, and Iraqis have far less to go to re-establish a working infrastructure, whereas the Afghanis, at least the ones who we have to convince, are still working with a 13th century mentality, and it's going to take much low intensity education to brink these guys up to the level where they can even appreciate what we're trying to do for them.
Posted by: SGT B at June 20, 2009 11:42 PM (dX9rw)
7
Why are we in Afghanistan? If I had much more time - I would start with "Because the New York Times refused to hire a third rate stringer named Karl Marx," and lay out 19th and 20th Century history from there. But that would necessarily omit the most important part. Human nature.
And that's something that is better learned by observation than from a book. Or a web page. For this question, perhaps the best basic text would be Aristotle's Politics. But Aristotle was far from politically correct.
Since you use Robert Heinlein's grok properly - a couple of bucks at the used book store should buy a copy of Heinlein's Starship Trooper. The basics are there, and expanded upon in his Time Enough for Love. As they are in his collected short stories, The Past Through Tomorrow.
Or pick up a copy of Rose Wilder Lane's "The Discovery of Freedom." When it was new our Civics Teacher assigned it to my class. The 1850's history Mrs. Lane used was outdated when the book was written - but her conclusions are exactly right. So it's worth a read
You should be able to finish all three in a couple of afternoons, although you might skip parts of "Love."
But basically, we are in Afghanistan because our eventual survival depends on it. Not our survival as a country - our personal survival.
The survival of yourself and of your children. And of everyone around you and their children.
Because the aim of the Talib and other Islamic groups is to enslave the rest of the world. Ostensibly for Allah - actually for their own power and profit. And that puts all our lives in peril.
Stranger
Posted by: Stranger at June 21, 2009 01:01 AM (uu3eD)
8
Another sometime-denizen of the Castle checking in. Your post gave me chills of the worst sort, after seeing transports streaming out of McChord AFB on Saturday. I know holidays don't REALLY mean much in the grand scheme of things, but, the day before Father's day, away they go. To what end? How do we end the very last membef of the Taliban? Do we need to end the people that replace them too?
I don't know either. And that does not make me happy.
Posted by: MCart at June 22, 2009 01:43 PM (z9gCU)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
NOT THE CHANGE WE COULD BELIEVE IN
Here's another
toldyaso for Bush's breakfast table, this time from
Andrew Sullivan:
We need to start confronting the president at his events. We need civil
disobedience. We need to tell him we do not want another fricking
speech where he tells us he is a fierce advocate for our rights, when
that is quite plainly at this point not true. [...] I worked my ass off to get this man to power.
Now don't get me wrong, I am happy that Democrats are pointing out Obama's flaws. I
did the same with Bush. (Oh, and that link is hilarious: Andrew Sullivan was a different man five years ago.) I encourage Democrats to speak out when their guy is not representing them. I want them to see Pres Obama for who he really is, not some blank slate they project onto.
But I find the "this isn't the change we could believe in" remorse to be amusing.
Posted by: Sarah at
06:57 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 162 words, total size 1 kb.
1
They simply weren't paying attention if they are now surprised by what he is doing. Shame on them.
Posted by: tim at June 19, 2009 03:40 PM (nno0f)
2
Whenever I see Toldyaso on your blog I think of this episode of Will and Grace where Debbie Reynolds is singing and doing a little dance.
I find it amusing too, but also a little frightening that so much of the country had their collective heads up their rears in the first place.
Posted by: Mare at June 20, 2009 10:48 AM (HUa8I)
3
"We need to start confronting the president at his events."
Sullivan should also be saying,
"We need to start asking ourselves, what were we thinking?
Were we thinking?"
I have not read Sullivan in years. This piece makes him sound like a one-issue guy (which he isn't). It embodies identity politics. It's all about my X-ness, and I'm gonna be unhappy until
others affirm
my rights as an X.
But when you hear Democrats criticize Obama, keep in mind that the enemy of your enemy is not necessarily your friend. Many readers of this site might think Obama goes too far, but some of Obama's Democrat critics think he doesn't go far
enough.
Posted by: Amritas at June 20, 2009 09:05 PM (x4B1D)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
FEWER "BOOTY" JOKES, PLEASE
Oh good heavens, they tarted up the pirate show.
We saw the show six years ago when we were here, and it was clever: swashbuckling, cannon battles, proper action. But then someone at Treasure Island thought, "You know what this pirate show needs? Thongs." And now, it's a Britney Spears video with a pirate theme. Ugh.
However, it did end up being a good platform for some movie quote jokes. My husband worked in the following:
"They're gonna love him up and turn him into a horny toad."
"That's not pirates, that's ass."
"Let me guess, he fixes the cable?"
Dear Treasure Island: The addition of skanky girls does not automatically improve every single thing in Las Vegas. I'm just sayin'.
Posted by: Sarah at
12:16 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 125 words, total size 1 kb.
June 18, 2009
UNKNOWN UNKNOWNS
There are known knowns; there are things we know we know. We also know
there are known unknowns; that is to say we know there are some things
we do not know. But there are also unknown unknowns -- the ones we
don't know we don't know.
Rummy was right. Last night I encountered an unknown unknown, something I did not know I had never seen because the thought never crossed my mind. I didn't know what I was missing until I encountered it.
If you have never seen a contortionist pole dance, then you have no idea what you've never seen.
Zumanity was wicked cool.
Posted by: Sarah at
09:03 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 108 words, total size 1 kb.
1
We loved Zumanity when we were there a few years ago.
Posted by: Beth at June 18, 2009 09:20 AM (0FZs/)
2
Wait, just a sec - was that a midget? No, seriously, was it?
I so totally want to see that show!
Posted by: airforcewife at June 18, 2009 03:28 PM (NqbuI)
3
Rumsfeld and Zumanity in the same post! Only at TTG.
Posted by: Amritas at June 18, 2009 05:39 PM (HLxzL)
4
I knew exactly what you meant when you said it! We saw the same show, and yep, that's the best way to describe it!
Posted by: Sara at June 23, 2009 09:37 PM (uG01M)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
167kb generated in CPU 0.0865, elapsed 0.202 seconds.
66 queries taking 0.1695 seconds, 353 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.