August 31, 2004
ELECTION
"It's an election year, and America stands at a crossroads." Thus begins CavX's
great new post.
Posted by: Sarah at
10:58 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 18 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Sarah - that is a great site. Thanks. I hope the movie comes out - can't they do it as a preview or commercial in movie theatres?
Posted by: Kathleen A at September 01, 2004 12:20 PM (vnAYT)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
EUREKA
This will take about 10 seconds, but the eureka moment will be worth it. (Make sure you click on the green headline.)
Posted by: Sarah at
02:59 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 24 words, total size 1 kb.
1
What exactly are you referring to? That Theodorakis interview is jam-packed with malignant memes.
Posted by: Amritas at August 31, 2004 09:04 AM (GB57s)
2
Nah, click on the Klan headline. That's what I meant.
Posted by: Sarah at August 31, 2004 10:41 AM (wMd0O)
3
Ah, I see what happened. Any link one's mouse is over turns green at Allah's. I just so happened to have my cursor over the second link, so that one was green and the one you were referring to was red.
This dumb American thinks he knows why anti-Semitism is up. Wait, did I say "thinks"? Only European intellectuals can do that. And apparently some of them can't figure out this mystery.
Posted by: Amritas at August 31, 2004 11:19 AM (GB57s)
4
sorry You are not authorized to login to this page, Please try again. -1
Posted by: casino at August 30, 2005 04:58 AM (DKl3T)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
MY KIND OF MAN
I hear Rudy Giuliani was a hit. I can't watch the RNC here, so I have to read it, and
I like what I read. And you know what else I like? I like having a president who's
uncomfortable with the Queen of England and completely at home with a crew of construction workers. But maybe that's just me.
MORE TO GROK:
Thanks, NightHawk. It was even better to watch than to read.
Posted by: Sarah at
02:49 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 81 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Character. I would guess that even William F. Buckley would feel the same as Bush. Not Kennedy. Not Kerry. Not Hillary, although Bill might.
Posted by: Mike at August 31, 2004 07:48 AM (MqNKC)
2
Take a look at C-Span (http://www.c-span.org). They have the video of Rudy's speech.
Posted by: NightHawk at August 31, 2004 10:19 AM (jy9sQ)
3
Rudy Giuliani said in a past presidential race that he would find it hard to back any candidate who favored repealing the federal assault weapons ban:
Someone who now voted to roll back the assault-weapons ban would really be demonstrating that special interest politics mean more to them than life-or-death issues.
Hmmm...And Bush supported the extention of the ban back in 2000, but now he is going to let it expire on Sept 13th. Sounds like some people are flip-flopping.
Not to mention the fact that you have no idea who Giuliani really is. As long as he pays lip service to your Bush, you don't care about anything else.
P.S. I didn't see anything about Bush's latest...reversal...
"Can we win the war on terror? I don't think you can win it."
Posted by: rfidtag at August 31, 2004 10:56 AM (XxIKf)
4
"Can we win the war on terror? I don't think you can win it."
I'm of the opinion he means it in the same way that we haven't defeated Nazism, or Stalinism. They're still there, but they're in a situation like the one Bush describes in the rest of the quote.
Kalroy
Posted by: kalroy at August 31, 2004 12:52 PM (q1aeu)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
August 30, 2004
PEER REVIEW
Deskmerc explains the importance of
peer review in an excellent post.
Posted by: Sarah at
01:55 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 15 words, total size 1 kb.
THERE'S A WAR ON
Steyn says the same thing that I told my friend when
we discussed stem cell research:
But [Bush at the RNC] will talk up successes in the war and remind us that, if we don't win it, the best prescription-drugs plan in the world isn't going to make much difference.
Posted by: Sarah at
03:12 AM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 54 words, total size 1 kb.
1
The problem with that kind of argument is this: Many people figure that the probability of a prescription drugs them affecting them is much higher than the probability of anyone they know getting hurt or killed in the next 9/11. So they don't care if the US loses the war in the long run because they want their drugs in the short run. Domestic socialism has much more appeal than vague, abstract violence abroad. "Gimme government goodies" is the mentality of too many Americans.
Posted by: Amritas at August 30, 2004 10:05 AM (McZj1)
2
"a prescription drugs them" should read "a prescription drugs plan."
Another problem is that many people (and I am not talking about Leftist fanatics) probably don't see what the point of winning is. So what if the US wins against al-Whoever in Ira-q-or-n? What's that got to do with ME?
Hawks sense an existential threat looming toward the US. Doves don't. They don't perceive Islamists as being the equals of the Third Reich or the Japanese Empire. I would say that the Islamists are weaker - and in some ways worse.
If Islamist air forces and navies were blasting apart the East Coast, you can bet that all but the most devoted pacifists would become hawks overnight.
Until then (that is, almost certainly never), people will think: a Nick Berg here, somebody else there, what's the big deal? Three thousand deaths weren't enough for them.
Posted by: Amritas at August 30, 2004 10:21 AM (McZj1)
3
I think you're right, Amritas...the threat is too intangible for many people. And here's what's funny: many people on the left talk continuously about how "intelligent" they are. But what *is* intelligence, if not the ability to perceive and act on things that can be perceived only indirectly, and to identify trends before they hit you in the face?
Posted by: David Foster at August 30, 2004 11:30 AM (XUtCY)
4
David,
By that definition of "intelligence," extreme Leftists would still think they are smart since they are "catching on" to the Nazification of America that eludes me for some reason. While they see the Fourth Reich coming (if it isn't already here), I just utter "duhhhh" as I vote for Bush.
Posted by: Amritas at August 30, 2004 01:29 PM (McZj1)
5
Time to reread the Constitution. The Federal Government's main job is to protect the people. Let Merck and Pfizer take care of stem cell research.
Posted by: Tanker Schreiber at August 30, 2004 02:13 PM (qFLTD)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
NASTY
You know, I've seen some pretty hateful stuff in my years of being glued to the blogosphere, but oh...my...
god.
Posted by: Sarah at
03:00 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 21 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Yup. The Left has hit bottom and is digging furiously.
On the bright side, if this is the best (worst?) they can do, things are looking pretty good for the Right.
Posted by: Francis W. Porretto at August 30, 2004 05:51 AM (MzH7h)
2
Just when I'm convinced that the left has hit the bottom of the barrel, I'm reminded that UNDER the barrel still exists. If they weren't such drooling idiots, they'd know that this sort of crap isn't going to win any converts in middle America.
Posted by: physics geek at August 30, 2004 11:04 AM (Xvrs7)
3
They're not interested in winning converts. They simply want to pat themselves on the back for how brilliant they are.
Posted by: Mike at August 30, 2004 11:36 AM (MqNKC)
4
I like to think that I have a very healthy sense of humor. I can laugh at damned near anything, but this is sickening.
Posted by: Jim at August 30, 2004 10:49 PM (BjDAE)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
CLOAK
VDH's newest contains a really nice quote from Thucydides:
For there is justice in the claim that steadfastness in his country's battles should be as a cloak to cover a man's other imperfections; since the good action has blotted out the bad, and his merit as a citizen more than outweighed his demerits as an individual.
Unfortunately, there are many here who work and live on post who look down their noses at our Soldiers. However, I often agree with Thucydides: a Soldier's service, if it is noble, trumps his faults. Among the students I've had in my classes, there have been several who have been in and out of jail, who were in dangerous gangs, and who previously just generally didn't contribute much to society. In any other circumstances, I can't imagine how I would have ever come to associate with people of that background. But selfless service can cloak a myriad of imperfections. He may have been a dumb kid who landed himself in jail, but now he's a dedicated leader who's aiming for an E-7. He may have been a dangerous gangbanger, but now he's found religion and a life of responsibility as a father and husband. He may have been a drug-dealing punk who joined because the courts forced him, but now he's thinking of making a career of it. For me, the minute they put on that uniform -- as long as they live by the values it represents -- they have earned respect and dignity, despite their individual flaws.
Posted by: Sarah at
02:57 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 257 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Well said. Kerry could never grasp that. Nor his followers in the '70s.
Posted by: Mike at August 30, 2004 07:46 AM (MqNKC)
2
There's a very interesting novel, "The Ship," by the author of the Hornblower novels. It was written as propaganda in WWII, but is very enlightening on the subject you raise. The author describes about 20 members of the crew of a cruiser, and discusses what motivates each of them. In the end, the man who saves the ship (after it is hit by enemy fire) is a person with marginal intelligence, a frequent drunk whose behavior problems have been so bad that the Captain was planning to have him thrown out of the Navy.
Posted by: David Foster at August 30, 2004 11:34 AM (XUtCY)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
August 29, 2004
NAP
The commander sent a CD home that contained several hundred photos of my husband's company. This one is my favorite. I can't even tell who this is, but there's something about it that I find quite touching. I don't know how to put it into words; it just chokes me up to see this napping hero.
Posted by: Sarah at
04:11 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 58 words, total size 1 kb.
1
A GI can sleep anywhere. Anywhere.
Posted by: Mike at August 29, 2004 05:47 PM (00cb0)
2
Heck, I have sleep in worse places and positions than that, but it sure looks comfortable.
Posted by: Birdie at August 29, 2004 06:01 PM (ohCKH)
3
The VERY FIRST time Alex met my dad, he was pretty tired. He walked into my house, was introduced to Dad, sat down on the stairway by the front door while Dad and I talked, and within about two minutes was fast asleep, sitting up.
He's also been known to fall asleep in the shower--standing up.
Posted by: Carla at August 29, 2004 08:20 PM (r5M6F)
Posted by: Jason at August 30, 2004 10:40 AM (0iK+f)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
IRAN
When I read the book
Alas, Babylon two years ago, I could hardly put it down. It's the story of the aftermath of nuclear war and how the remaining people struggled to survive. I've been thinking a lot about it lately as I've been following Iran's nuclear progress over at LGF. The thing is, a series of articles showing Iran getting closer and closer seems to have little impact on anyone, but picture it as a narrative or a movie, and it starts to seem important. Picture ominous build-up music and scenes of putting the final touches on while the protagonist races to get there in time. That's what I fear we're facing, though the boring articles describing the scenario really play down the urgency. But
Alas, Babylon is never far from my mind.
Posted by: Sarah at
02:46 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 136 words, total size 1 kb.
1
It's not just nuclear weapons per se...it's also the tremendous efforts that Iran is making in the development and acquisition of missiles. To think of these weapons being in the hands of the people who hanged that girl (last week) is horrifying.
Posted by: David Foster at August 29, 2004 12:36 PM (XUtCY)
Posted by: Stephen Macklin at August 29, 2004 11:05 PM (U3CvV)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
BEST
I don't have the patience to go look it up, but a long time ago I wondered if we'd all still be blogging in ten years. I wondered if the fad would die or people would get burned out. I thought we might all hit a point where we just lost interest, but I never wanted to see it happen to
The Best.
Posted by: Sarah at
02:25 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 65 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Time and change happeneth to us all, dear. It happened to me, fairly recently. There's no guarantee that Den Beste will break his sabbatical, but there's no guarantee that he
won't, either.
To keep one's enthusiasm for a serious and demanding pastime, one must focus on its rewards and contrive to ignore its costs. Den Beste appears to have been discouraged by the mountains of E-mail he gets, much of which is critical, nit-picky, or disagreeable in tone. Perhaps he'll return after he's shaken off the effect -- and will henceforward delete all his E-mail unread, a tonic for the pundit's soul that I've found most refreshing.
Posted by: Francis W. Porretto at August 29, 2004 09:20 AM (MzH7h)
2
He's done a hell of a lot, and he's earned, and I'm sure he needs, a break. I suspect that sooner or later he will need to blog again.
In the meantime, we'll try to hold the fort for him.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at August 29, 2004 02:02 PM (+S1Ft)
3
He'll be back once all those who pester quit visiting. Until then, we still have your words, and those of our Curmudgeon, to read.
Posted by: Mike at August 29, 2004 09:32 PM (00cb0)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
August 28, 2004
GRAMMAR
Revelation: teaching something that's second nature is very hard.
This weekend I'm teaching a seminar called Grammar Review. Grammar is no big problem for me. I hardly ever have to stop to think about the rules. I generally can identify compound-complex sentences, comma splices, and subordinating conjunctions with ease, so that makes it really hard to teach it to someone who struggles. In planning for my class today, I allotted like 30 minutes for things that took us over an hour to actually accomplish because I completely misjudged how much time it would take people to catch on. And I think they all hate me and that the final exam I wrote is going to kick their butts. Whoops. Trial and error, I guess; it's the first time I've taught this class.
They're getting it, slowly, but we need eight weeks instead of two days.
Posted by: Sarah at
12:57 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 147 words, total size 1 kb.
1
They must have not had the Shurley method but I'm not sure that we had it at Lindbergh when you were there. I'm sending some more ribbons with your mom. One especially just for you. Jane
Posted by: Jane at August 28, 2004 09:49 PM (Y24sw)
2
Guess I should have previewed that last message because I see a grammar mistake. Jane
Posted by: Jane at August 28, 2004 09:51 PM (Y24sw)
3
I for one "skipped" over English in high school and college. Looking back now, I certainly should have listened more closely. Now, I struggle daily with what is for most, simplistic. I will be sure to pay close attention to my children to ensure that they are digesting and learning what is needed.
Posted by: StarkTruth at August 30, 2004 01:57 AM (Cvlxp)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
August 27, 2004
OVERLAP
I've only taken two days of statistics so far, Stephen, so I can't explain this
polling overlap either. It is pretty funny though.
Posted by: Sarah at
10:11 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 25 words, total size 1 kb.
GRADES
Long-time readers will know that nothing gets my blood boiling like some snotty intellectual calling average Americans stupid. They frequently do it to our servicemembers, which really ticks me off. And they do it all the time to our President. Nothing makes me madder than the audacity of a
statement like this:
Does anyone in America doubt that Kerry has a higher IQ than Bush? I'm sure their SATs and college transcripts would put Kerry far ahead.
OK, well we all know President Bush's grades, since "Bush is dumb" is like sooo 2000. What are Kerry's grades, then? Can't Howell Raines find them and make a factual statement instead of resorting to bandwagon techniques?
I don't know what happens behind closed White House doors. I don't really care who's pulling most of the weight, be it Bush or Cheney or Rice. As a team, they're getting the job done. But, having absolutely no facts at my disposal, I'm not sure I want to poke at President Bush's IQ. What does IQ measure? Little picture games and mind puzzles and making connections and so on. I think President Bush might do quite well on a test of this nature.
Smarts isn't about memorizing and regurgitating, which is what the SAT and grades are about. Hell, I'm freaking awesome at that. I can play the school game like nobody's business, which is how you end up valedictorian and summa cum laude. But I'm slowly learning that playing school and playing life are completely different things.
Last night I had my second stats class. We learned variance and standard deviation, long formulas involving sigmas and x-bars and things that give most math-fearing people (the majority of the class) the heebie-jeebies. But I got the formulas right away. I figured out how to do the functions on the calculator right away. But then when I raised my hand and asked for how it applies to the real world, I could hear the panic in people's gasps. It's bad enough we have to plug in the frequency and take square roots, for chrissake, who cares what it all means! But I cared. I'm not taking stats just to finish a degree; I'm taking it because I want to know how it applies to the real world. And I could easily see how to plug in all the data, but I couldn't for the life of me figure out the relationship between the answer we got (18.2 cents) and the real problem (increase cigarette taxes in 27 states).
It's very humbling to realize you can't figure it out unless the teacher shows you how.
I've realized that I've an overabundance of capability, but no real ability to decipher relationships on my own. Give me formulas, give me numbers, and I'll give you all the answers, but ask me what it means and I'll stutter. And I get A's and had a relatively high SAT score. (I'm getting better at it through blogging, but I'm still stunned by the likes of Den Beste, Bunker, and CavX. I'll never get to that level.)
President Bush, and whoever else is working behind closed doors with him, can see the big picture. I don't care if he can plug the numbers into the calculator himself or if Cheney does it for him, as long as he continues to get 'er done. What indication do we have that Kerry sees the big picture? He obviously can't even make the mental relationship that voting for war and against funding makes you look like a jackass.
Look, I just don't like to call anyone stupid. I especially don't like it when Howell Raines -- who presumably thought Jayson Blair was pretty smart -- points his finger at the President. There's much more to smarts than grades in college; I'd say, to quote CavX, that
spending the last three years destroying terrorist training camps, breaking up terror cells in the US and abroad, uncovering a multinational nuclear proliferation ring, forcing belligerent North Korea to the bargaining table, cowing Libya into giving up its WMD programs and terrorist support, and winning two wars against terrorist-supporting Islamofascist dictatorships in the process
makes the President look pretty smart to me.
MORE TO GROK:
Instapundit says pretty much the same thing I said.
And Ann Althouse:
In any case, my questions about Kerry's intelligence do not arise solely from my inference that he had a poor academic record and low standardized test scores. My questions are also based on his exasperatingly convoluted and unclear manner of speaking. This has been excused as a propensity for "nuance" and "complexity," but could also be caused by a lack of mental capacity. It could also be willful evasion. I'd really like to know.
Posted by: Sarah at
03:10 AM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 794 words, total size 5 kb.
1
Also, it makes for a rather more substantial war record than Kerry's 17 weeks in Vietnam.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at August 27, 2004 04:21 AM (kOqZ6)
2
Aw, shucks... Don't sell yourself short. I was curious how the Sadistics class was going.
You make a really good point about relative intelligence. The Cadets I taught were all close to the top of their high school class rankings, many of them valedictorians. All were extremely bright. But some had trouble with analysis and critical thinking. All their school career prior to USAFA was based in a great deal of rote learning. It was a tough slog for some who got Cs and Ds for the first time in their lives. The most rewarding part of the job was seeing that light come on over their heads!
Posted by: Mike at August 27, 2004 07:42 AM (MqNKC)
3
I agree with Mike, I think you're selling yourself short.
But you are right on the money about knowledge and application. To know facts, figures and such is very important. Yes. BUT in my mind, the application of that information, the ability to lead and make decisions based on that information is what is so key in execution. Our President is a great leader. He built a team of experts, those with the knowledge and expertise in certain areas, he manages the big picture based on their information. He makes decisions. That's what's so important.
I am a huge supporter of education. Knowledge is power. BUT some of the best leaders I've known and/or worked for were more street smart than book smart. They knew to surround themselves with those that know and use that to get the job done.
(Sorry to go off like this, but it's something that has been a thorn in my side since 2000. Guess I'm going to need to do a post on it eventually!)
Posted by: Tammi at August 27, 2004 08:15 AM (4Ls5e)
4
I haven't seen any evidence that Kerry is particularly intelligent. Using lots of big words strung together in complex sentences is not a sign of intelligence, but rather of a particular kind of family and educational background. And as Goethe said, "When ideas fail, words come in very handy."
Posted by: David Foster at August 27, 2004 10:20 AM (XUtCY)
5
If Dubya is dumb, he MY KIND of dumb. Dumb enough to get the job done without the total self-paralysis of Kerry's "nuanced" BS. Liberals think that trying to consider everything from every point of view is smart. While Kerry's standing there gazing at the sky and pondering, Bush is tying Kerry's shoelaces together, stealing his wallet and taping a "KICK ME" sign to his back. Besides, any man who can graduate from both Yale AND Harvard is plenty smart enough for me!
Posted by: CavalierX at August 27, 2004 10:23 AM (sA6XT)
6
My questions are also based on his exasperatingly convoluted and unclear manner of speaking.
If that's the criterion we're using for judging IQ, then Bush would be about
five points above a ficus plant.
I mean, really. Why don't you just attack Kerry for being too beholden to big oil and Christian fundamentalists?
Posted by: apostropher at September 10, 2004 08:00 PM (XA/yX)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
August 26, 2004
SNIPER
I have half-assedly followed Kim du Toit's donations to snipers SGT Walter and SPC Adam for a while now. The other day he posted
a photo of them, and if it ain't the jawdropping-est thing I've ever seen, I don't know what is. Then tonight I found the
Adopt A Sniper website via
The Patriette, and I got to thinking. So I split my money and donated a little bit to Kim's two snipers and a little bit to some anonymous snipers.
Is it weird that the word "sniper" is a turn-on?
Posted by: Sarah at
05:31 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 94 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I just want to know if any of them have single dads? (geez I hate getting old)
Posted by: Tammi at August 26, 2004 05:50 PM (4Ls5e)
2
"Is it weird that the word "sniper" is a turn-on?"
That's not weird. I think if they posted more pics of snipers in their uniforms, looking all sexy, it would definitely convince more of us gals out there to do all we can to help keep those handsome heroes safe. Rowr.
Hee hee hee.
Posted by: The Patriette at August 26, 2004 07:10 PM (YeLSd)
3
That is weird that the senior guy is the sniper. When I was a sniper, I had a superior guy as my spotter. Makes me wonder what the Mech units are doing.
Posted by: Birdie at August 28, 2004 10:16 PM (ohCKH)
4
Thanks for the support ladies.
Kind regards,
Brian K. Sain, Advisory Board
American Sniper Association
Police Marksman Association
Posted by: Brian K. Sain at September 11, 2004 11:06 PM (Vpt0N)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
OPTIMIST
Could it be true? Could John Kerry "
go down in history as the man who made Dukakis look good"? I'd like to hope so...
Posted by: Sarah at
12:31 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 26 words, total size 1 kb.
FALLEN
I've
written before about parents of fallen Soldiers who don't support the mission. I think it's very sad. But today, through Sgt Hook, I was moved to tears by a parent who does support his fallen son, in a very noble and selfless way.
Hook wrote about a memorial service he attended in Afghanistan; the Soldier's father reads Hook's blog, heretofore unbeknownst to Hook. I can't read SGT Daniel Galvan's father's message without feeling a jumble of pride, sadness, and loyalty:
Hook,
I do not mind at all your posting my email on your blog. Your words and thoughts are greatly appreciated as is your blog appreciated as a way to pay tribute to our soldiers. If you would pass on my thanks to DanielÂ’s First Sergeant for the conduct of his memorial. I have only gotten second hand reports through my daughter-in-law but what I have heard it was a moving experience for my sonÂ’s fellow soldiers in attendance.
If I may be so bold, I charge DanielÂ’s Division with completing the duty we have to make sure that the lowlifes that hit us on our homeland on 911 are brought to justice. You can pass the word to DanielÂ’s fellow soldiers that his Dad is proud of him and of all who wear the uniform, I will pray daily for all and that we bring this action to a fitting and just conclusion in a timely manner; I can think of no better tribute to Daniel that that.
In closing let me say that Daniel loved the Army, flying, his family, his parents and above all he loved the USA. I used to say that my heart pumped OD blood (half in jest) but I believe that DanielÂ’s heart did.
Blas E. Galvan
Mr. Galvan, I promise to do my part here on the homefront to make sure your son's sacrifice is never forgotten. And I'll put in a request to the Dukes of 1 ID 3rd Brigade to help get the lowlifes.
Posted by: Sarah at
10:47 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 337 words, total size 2 kb.
LINKS
OK, there are a lot of things out there that I think you guys should be reading, but I'm too drained to write anything about them. So just take my word for it and go read
this and
this and
this and
this and
this. And this, about
how pro-wrestling is political. I have homework to do.
Posted by: Sarah at
07:42 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 59 words, total size 1 kb.
WOW
Here's the
forgotten story of seven U.S. airmen killed by a mob in Rüsselsheim, Germany, during World War II.
And here's the developing story of a sniper.
Posted by: Sarah at
07:13 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 29 words, total size 1 kb.
MILITARY SPOUSES
LT A's wife forwarded me this. She also wrote to say that LT A is having complications, so please keep him in your thoughts.
Military Spouses - There's a Difference
by Col Steven Arrington
Nellis Air Force Base
Over the years, I've talked a lot about military spouses ... how special they are and the price they pay for freedom too. The funny thing about it, is most military spouses don't consider themselves different from other spouses. They do what they have to do, bound together not by blood or merely friendship, but with a shared spirit whose origin is in the very essence of what love truly is. Is there truly a difference? I think there is. You have to decide for yourself.
Other spouses get married and look forward to building equity in a home and putting down family roots. Military spouses get married and know they'll live in base housing or rent, and their roots must be short so they can be transplanted frequently.
Other spouses decorate a home with flair and personality that will last a lifetime. Military spouses decorate a home with flare tempered with the knowledge that no two base houses have the same size windows or same size rooms. Curtains have to be flexible and multiple sets are a plus. Furniture must fit like puzzle pieces!
Other spouses have living rooms that are immaculate and seldom used. Military spouses have immaculate living room/dining room combos. The coffee table got a scratch or two moving from Germany, but it sill looks pretty good.
Other spouses say goodbye to their spouse for a business trip and know they won't see them for a week. They are lonely, but can survive. Military spouses say good-bye to their deploying spouse and know they won't see them for months, or for a remote, a year. They are lonely, but will survive.
Other spouses get used to saying 'hello' to friends they see all the time. Military spouses get used to saying 'good-bye' to friends made the last two years.
Other spouses worry about whether their child will be class president next year. Military spouses worry about whether their child will be accepted in yet another new school next year and whether that school will be the worst in the city again.
Other spouses can count on spouse participation in special events such as birthdays, anniversaries, concerts, football games, graduation, and even the birth of a child. Military spouses only count on each other; because they realize that the Flag has to come first if freedom is to survive. It has to be that way.
Other spouses put up yellow ribbons when the troops are imperiled across the globe and take them down when the troops come home. Military spouses wear yellow ribbons on their hearts and they never go away.
Other spouses worry about being late for Mom's Thanksgiving dinner. Military spouses worry about getting back from Japan in time for Dad's funeral.
And other spouses are touched by the television program showing an elderly lady putting a card down in front of a long, black wall that has names on it. The card simply says "Happy Birthday, Sweetheart. You would have been sixty today." A military spouse is the lady with the card. And the wall is the Vietnam memorial.
I would never say military spouses are better or worse than other spouses are. But I will say there is a difference. Our country asks more of military spouses than is asked of other spouses. Military spouses pay just as high a price for freedom as do their active duty husbands or wives. Perhaps the price they pay is even higher. Dying in service to our country isn't near as hard as loving someone who has died in service to our country, and having to live without them!
God bless our military spouses for all they freely give!
I like that: "the Flag has to come first if freedom is to survive." I'm proud to be lumped together with other military spouses.
Posted by: Sarah at
03:47 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 679 words, total size 4 kb.
1
The Flag is a good symbol. In most countries, when people rally or protest, they carry posters with people's faces on them--some "Dear Leader." In our country, people carry or abuse our flag. I think it really says something about how different we are from others. The individual leadership is looked upon in our hearts as temporary, the Flag is the constant.
God, watch over this young man and his wife.
Posted by: Mike at August 26, 2004 07:35 AM (MqNKC)
2
That is so true. Thank you for including it and especially for being a military spouse. Jane
Posted by: Jane at August 28, 2004 09:58 PM (Y24sw)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
August 25, 2004
DENZEL
Man, I wish I could've seen this exchange between
Katie Couric and Denzel Washington. Thank heavens for brave celebrities...
(emailed to me by Tim)
MORE TO GROK:
I went and bought Courage Under Fire online, just because of Denzel. And also because that's the movie that made me know I wanted to be a military wife. After we watched it in ROTC class, I walked home from class all full of pride and love for my then-boyfriend's service. And I got back to his room to find he'd smashed a ukulele to splinters because a class he needed to graduate filled before he could register and therefore he would have to give up his slot in Air Assault School and take the business class in summer school.
As I calmed him down, I knew then that he was the man for me. I told him that as long as he beat up musical instruments instead of me, I'd stand by him through anything.
True story.
MORE:
Well, that's weird. Reader Matt found it on Snopes, and the account is MIGHTY different. I always check the validity of email forwards, but I don't snope out websites (though on a second glance, I should have if I'd read the parenthetical statement more thoroughly). Sigh. Oh well...it's still a good movie.
Hilarious that Meryl Streep said that money is bad though.
Posted by: Sarah at
05:50 AM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
Post contains 230 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Sarah - thanks for the link. I make it a point NEVER to watch the Today Show because their open hostility towards the president makes me mad. I knew I loved Denzel for a reason. HE should be a keynote speaker at the convention!
Posted by: Kathleen A at August 25, 2004 07:48 AM (vnAYT)
2
The Denzel-Couric exchange didn't actually happen as described.
Snopes has the actual transcript:
http://www.snopes.com/politics/soapbox/denzel.asp
Posted by: Matt at August 25, 2004 10:12 AM (jhAOH)
3
Thanks for the snopes link! That was very interesting. Someone let me know when Meryl starts giving away all her money... *grin*
LOL - I nearly always go to snopes for just about any email I get that looks like it has celebrities claiming to have said something. I've found some interesting things that way.
Posted by: Teresa at August 25, 2004 11:22 AM (nAfYo)
4
Denzel Washington called himself "an ex-slave"!?
If Meryl Streep thinks money is so "bad," why does she contaminate yourself with it? Oh, I see, she doesn't want to give it away lest she contaminates others. Only a noble soul like her can keep its evil under control.
Posted by: Amritas at August 25, 2004 12:02 PM (q9T9n)
5
Hmmmm.....I thought EUROPEANS brought slavery to America, and AMERICANS fought a war to end it.
Washington: "You know, I haven't seen 'Fahrenheit 9/11,' because I live in America. I grew up here. I'm an ex-slave. I'm a result of what this country can do. So it's nothing new to me.
Posted by: Tanker Schreiber at August 25, 2004 12:09 PM (QMAjT)
6
You are posting an email hoax here. Talk about a knee-jerk reaction. You might want to do a little more homework next time, or are email hoaxes the best evidence that the right wingers can come up with these days?
Posted by: laughing at August 26, 2004 10:30 AM (n17hK)
7
Laughing, are you drunk or just ignorant? I added an update that points directly to Snopes LONG before you commented. Do you suggest I delete the whole post and pretend I never said it, as people like Kos do?
Posted by: Sarah at August 26, 2004 10:50 AM (9iZmB)
8
Sarah -
As I recall I sent you a separate link to the Iowa Presidential Campaign Watch website when I sent you the email forward. That site, which I checked before sending you the article seemed to me to be a worthy corroborator.
Obviously I was wrong and I apologize for it. I never send stuff I don't corroborate elsewhere. However, this time my judgment was suspect.
Posted by: Tim at August 26, 2004 11:52 AM (bzKQf)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
100kb generated in CPU 0.0304, elapsed 0.109 seconds.
62 queries taking 0.0905 seconds, 286 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.