October 31, 2006
HOW DO YOU SAY "ELITIST" IN CAMBODIAN?
Since my husband is the smartest man I know (go on, Erin, tell 'em what a genius he is), I have been seething today about what John Kerry said. I kept trying to think of something ba-zing to pimpslap him with, but other than a list of all the soldiers I know and how smart they are, I wasn't coming up with anything. Turns out I don't need to, because others have done the job for me. Head over to
Michelle Malkin's to watch Kerry look like an elitist douche and then read all the hatemail that's pouring in.
And what Kerry said -- “You know, education, if you make the most of it, if you study hard and you do your homework, and you make an effort to be smart, uh, you, you can do well. If you don’t, you get stuck in Iraq.” -- ain't exactly the most eloquent sentence I've ever heard. Good thing he spent top-dollar on that prissy degree of his.
Posted by: Sarah at
07:22 AM
| Comments (15)
| Add Comment
Post contains 180 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Kerry, not nuanced enough to articulate on matters of education? Say it isn't so!
Posted by: Deskmerc at October 31, 2006 10:28 AM (Qlh7l)
2
Kerry is actually right. Read "The dumbing-down of the U.S. Army" at slate magazine. (It's at slate dot com, but I can't post the link here.)
The scary thing to me is how the declining recruitment standards are going to eventually impact a high-tech army.
Posted by: Will at October 31, 2006 12:03 PM (QRBGL)
3
Will -- Well, maybe the solution to "dumbing down" is convincing our youth that the military is still an honorable endeavor with many benefits...not Kerry's "only retards join" nonsense.
Posted by: Sarah at October 31, 2006 12:56 PM (7Wklx)
4
Wow. That is elitist. I find it funny that this is coming from the same guy who tried to use the military and his service as a veteran in vietnam to win votes back in 2004.
Posted by: Nicole at October 31, 2006 01:02 PM (QxlT8)
5
No, Will, Kerry is wrong. You are acting as if Kerry was making allusions to the lower recruitment standards. He wasn't. He was saying that smart people don't end up in the army. Educated people don't end up in the army. Only stupid people go to the army.
If he is admonishing someone to study up, or they will end up in the Army, he is basically saying the Army is a dead end, last resort.
What about the people who follow his advice, and study up, but still decide to join the Army? According to Kerry, they couldn't possibly exist, because only the uneducated "end up" in the military.
I don't see how you can interpret this otherwise.
Posted by: CaliValleyGirl at October 31, 2006 01:04 PM (deur4)
6
Well if you want to discuss the actual statement, please note that Kerry said "in Iraq," NOT "in the army" or "in the military." To rational people, this implies that he's making a dig at the current conflict, not the US army as a whole. Bush demanding an apology is an act of desperation.
Posted by: Will at October 31, 2006 01:33 PM (QRBGL)
7
Yeah, OK, so my husband is working on an MBA, and he's "ending up" in Iraq for the second time. Maybe he should study harder...
Posted by: Sarah at October 31, 2006 01:35 PM (7Wklx)
8
Will,
He is reffering to Iraq, not the military?
Perhaps you understand now why people say it is difficult to support the troops, but not their effort in Iraq.
You basically just said, it is okay to diss all the soldiers, because it is referring to Iraq.
Soldiers can't pick and choose where they go. They sometimes get sent to unpopular wars. That doesn't justify Kerry insulting their choice of career, by insinuating that only those without a college education join up.
And while we are at it: what is with all this elitism? I am the only child of 4, who went to college, but I would in no way think that I am any smarter or even better off than my brothers.
Posted by: CaliValleyGirl at October 31, 2006 02:59 PM (deur4)
9
You don't need a Yale education to know who won the 2004 election.
Posted by: Greg Schreiber at October 31, 2006 03:01 PM (awqx6)
10
Go read the transcript. Kerry isn't insulting the troops, he's insulting the president, which I suppose, to a conservative, is just as bad.
The poeple will have their say next week, and this Prez will have his ass handed to him.
Posted by: Rob Roberts at October 31, 2006 04:54 PM (/55jD)
11
Well and Sarah, When Dick Armey agrees with Chris Matthews that Kerry is insulting Bush rather than our troops,well sigh! just sigh. you believe what you have to believe.Let's all get outraged about something!
Posted by: Rob Roberts at October 31, 2006 05:17 PM (/55jD)
12
RR said "The poeple will have their say next week, and this Prez will have his ass handed to him."
The last time I looked this year isn't a presidential election year. The votes aren't about President Bush...at least not among intelligent voters who recognize that voting on issues is more important than voting on who any one candidate is "friends" with.
Posted by: Peg at October 31, 2006 07:13 PM (JemrD)
13
To the dissenters--do you mean to suggest that Kerry's line was meant to target Bush, or are you saying that it did target only Bush? The first might be somewhat defensible (although I am not buying it), but any standard of evidence weak enough to support the second is so watered down as to be totally useless. I think our military personnel and those that support them have every right to be infuriated at both this mangled remark and the subsequent lack of apology, especially given Kerry's checkered history on the subject.
Posted by: Piercello at November 01, 2006 03:57 AM (EZcuZ)
14
I laughed all day at Kerry's feeble attempts to back out of his statements...he's making fun of the President, he's making a statement about the current conflict....???? What a train wreck. He needs to apologize, period.
Posted by: Nicole at November 01, 2006 01:26 PM (QxlT8)
15
Peg, Glad to see that you retained my misspelling of "Poeple" without comment.
I Predict that November 7, will give us one of three outcomes:
1. You will keep both chambers of congress.
2.you will lose both chambers.
3.you will lose one and keep the other.
You can quote me on all of this.
No matter what happens on November 7, Bush's lame duck status begins on November 8. The Republicans can't run from hiim fast enough.
Posted by: RobRoberts at November 01, 2006 05:31 PM (7nylo)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
ELEPHANT
I started this blog as a way to talk about poltics and issues without having to talk to anyone from my Real Life. At that time in my life, I didn't have any friends who think like I do, and I wanted somewhere to vent. Because I would never dream of venting this stuff in public.
So today when I read The Elephant in the Room, I could completely relate.
Judith says that it's usually Democrats who shun Republican friendships, but I have found myself as the shunner before. I have a few friends with whom I can have rational and polite discussions about the war or politics, but I have more than enough experience with those people who Make Pronouncements:
Another thing [Democrats] do which Kornblat doesn't give an example of, but which we all have experienced: They always start political conversations. None of us do. We have learned that no one wants to argue issues on their merits, that the room gets very quiet and unfriendly, that people start screaming at you, or rant the most loopy beliefs and conspiracy theories. We just assume that is not a topic anyone can treat in a dispassionate manner.
But they always provoke political conversations. Well, not conversations, which would be enjoyable and enlightening. They make pronouncements. And look around the room to see if anyone not only doesn't agree, but doesn't agree enthusiastically. As a friend deep in the closet in the theater world put it, you can't just sit quietly and wait for the topic to change. No, you are suspect if you do not vocally endorse the official opinion of the group. You thought you were in a project meeting or a coffee klatch or a dinner party, and all of a sudden it has turned into the Communist Youth League Self-Criticism Session.
There are only so many times I can stomach pronouncements like "Whew, won't it be better when Kerry is president?" or "So can you believe this crap that Bush is pulling?" And it's not easy to be friends with someone who walks into work, slams a copy of Fahrenheit 911 on my desk and says, "You need to watch this so maybe you'll think twice about voting for Bush." And so I end up distancing myself from those people. It's fine to have a friend who's a Democrat, but it's a drag to have a friend who says you're no better than Mohammad Atta. Or a friend who can't even muster up any sympathy that your husband is at war because "well, you started it." Or someone who says your friend with the gaping hole in his torso from an RPG is has been brainwashed into fighting for lies. I don't have much use for people like that in my life.
What's funny is that now the scales have tipped in my life. I don't blog massive rants like I did three years ago because I have more people in my Real Life to talk to about this stuff. And this weekend was unlike anything I've ever experienced: being with a group of people who are even bigger rightwing nutjobs than I am! I spent most of the weekend with my jaw on the floor, and I came home squealing to my husband about all the stuff people had said. It was fun, it was fun to not have to tiptoe around to avoid offending someone. And the lone Democrat in the room got some gentle ribbing and jokes tossed his way, but we all got along marvelously. Common ground and all.
So I can't say I've never shunned, but I certainly am capable of being friends with Democrats. No seriously, I am. I just prefer people who join me in a pretend throw up when I say the name Christiane Amanpour.
Posted by: Sarah at
06:06 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 638 words, total size 4 kb.
October 30, 2006
BLESSED
The SpouseBUZZ conference was a success this weekend. I got to meet my fellow bloggers and we had a great connect with the wives at Fort Hood. If you're interested in our discussion, I liveblogged the panels
here and
here. But one of the most touching things of the weekend happened when I left Texas.
I sat down on my flight home next to a man on a cell phone, whom I initially assumed would be a quiet businessman. But when he hung up, he asked me what I was doing in Texas. And there's this feeling you get in the two seconds after you mention that you're a part of the military, a hold-your-breath feeling where you wait for the person's reaction. It was going to be a long flight, and I didn't want to deal with anything unpleasant. But this situation couldn't have been better.
I was sitting next to George Pearsons, the pastor at Eagle Mountain International Church. He was extremely interested in learning what military families go through. He asked me many questions about what military spouses experience and what we think about various political issues and current events. We talked nonstop for two and a half hours. He told me about a program they have at their church that supports families of military servicemembers called Troops 91, named after Psalm 91. I told him about SpouseBUZZ and encouraged him to let his parishoners know about our website if they're looking for a place to connect while their loved one is deployed.
Right before we landed, he said he wanted to do something special for my family. He gave me a donation on behalf of his church, saying that we should use this money to go to dinner or do something to cherish our precious time together. He said he wanted to give me this money "to bless my family." I couldn't believe how much money he wanted me to take! He wouldn't let me refuse, and we parted ways a little better for having met each other.
As I drove home from the airport, I thought about this money and I realized something: my family is already blessed enough. My husband said the exact same thing when I showed him the money and told him the story. So I hope Pastor Pearsons doesn't mind if I use his church's money to bless some people who probably need it more than we do.
I'm going to donate this money from Eagle Mountain International Church to two organizations that have a connection to SpouseBUZZ. I'll send half to Sew Much Comfort, an organization that makes adaptive clothing for wounded troops. And I'll send the other half to Project Valour-IT, an organization that provides voice-activated laptops to troops whose wounds prevent them from communicating via computer with their loved ones.
Pastor Pearsons blessed me with his money, but what he really blessed me with was his kindness. He was a wonderful listener, a concerned American, and a man who is genuinely interested in understanding how we spouses cope with life in the military. I was blessed to have been in Seat 19E yesterday.
(This post is cross-posted at SpouseBUZZ.)
Posted by: Sarah at
09:47 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 533 words, total size 3 kb.
1
Thanks, Sarah, for thinking of Sew Much Comfort! How incredibly like you to be thinking of others first! Thank you Pastor Pearsons!
I also shared about the conference on the way home, but it was mostly on the way to Dallas and with the lovely person sitting next to me - Joan of Arc! What a moving weekend! Andi said it was life changing for some of the participants. I'd say it was life changing for the panelists - well, for this panelist anyway!
Miss everybody already! Thanks again!
Posted by: Ginger at October 30, 2006 11:57 AM (E3Fpd)
2
Bless you, Sarah. America is a better place because of you. Thanks you.
Posted by: JACK ARMY at November 03, 2006 12:34 PM (aZPIF)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
UGH
I'm sorry, but I don't see any reason it would ever be appropriate to
ask a soldier in an interview "You ever worry one day your number's gonna come up?" What kind of question is that from a journalist? If you want to get to that issue, could you at least ask it in a less crass way? And then to follow up with whether or not they think their wives are screwing around on them. Sweet merciful crap. What is wrong with people?
Posted by: Sarah at
06:47 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 86 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I suppose my response would be "why, you want the video or somethin?" then clock him with my kevlar.
Posted by: Deskmerc at October 30, 2006 12:10 PM (Qlh7l)
2
My husband said that the appropriate answer to this question is a punch square in the face.
Posted by: Sarah at October 31, 2006 07:24 AM (7Wklx)
3
Folks tell me that troops already distrust the press in Iraq. Geez ... could stuff like this be a part of it?
Hey I have news for the reporter ... Jody got your gal & boyfriend too!
Posted by: NOTR at November 01, 2006 11:19 AM (izx0t)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
VIDEO
Watch this video on the
good news from Iraq. It reminds me of why we could still use Tim behind a keyboard.
Posted by: Sarah at
04:05 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 24 words, total size 1 kb.
October 27, 2006
BYE
I'm leaving for Texas in a few minutes. Unfortunately, tonight is the military ball, which my husband is emceeing; I'm quite sad to miss this. As I said goodbye to my husband, I reminded him to have fun but stay out of trouble. He reminded me that those two things are mutually exclusive at a military ball...
Posted by: Sarah at
03:08 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 59 words, total size 1 kb.
1
congratulations on the World Series, Sarah. i was happy to see Eckstein win MVP, he's a good guy.
Posted by: annika at October 27, 2006 07:58 PM (qQD4Q)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
October 26, 2006
LUMPED TOGETHER
I just heard about these Active Duty servicemembers who are speaking out against the war. Whatever, that's their business. But I do take issue with one thing the ringleader, SGT Liam Madden,
says:
The goal is to have 2,000 names on the Appeal for Redress list when the messages are delivered to members of Congress in January.
"I think that's easily attainable," he said. "There's a seed of dissent in the military against this policy, and a core of people who are acting."
He doesn't believe many military personnel are politically opposed to the war, he said. But, he said, he believes a continuing cycle of redeployment has worn the patience of the troops.
"As far as widespread disapproval of the occupation of Iraq, I know no one likes being deployed over and over again and being away from their families for months at a time," Madden said.
Because of that, "I'm pretty sure there's a base of support" for the appeal to Congress, he said.
I'm not sure I really like the idea that he plans to get more signatures just because people don't want to deploy. If someone honestly thinks that we shouldn't be in Iraq, then he should sign this petition. But someone who just doesn't want to do his job (i.e. deploy where the military says to) shouldn't be lumped in the same category. Most soldiers and marines are growing weary from on-a-year-off-a-year, but they aren't the same as those who are anti-war.
One thing I found humorous was the quote from Madden's mother:
The clashing philosophies expressed by antiwar activists and the administration on Wednesday may ring familiar for Madden, who found himself in friendly debates with his mother, a supporter of using force against tyranny.
"We were direct opposites for a long time," said Oona Madden, a former restaurant owner in Bellows Falls. "I did support the war and still do to some extent. I don't buy into everything Liam tells me, but I support what he's doing -- as long as he covers his butt."
It's not too often you find an anti-war marine with a pro-war mama!
Posted by: Sarah at
01:03 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 359 words, total size 2 kb.
1
I’m confused. Is this guy against the war or being deployed continuously? By the way, I believe the Marine Corps deploys for eight month stints. 2,000 is a small percentage of the soldiers/marines who are active and who have been deployed to Iraq/Afghanistan. Anyways, this “speaking out” may make them feel better but it could get very nasty for them on base or in the brig, where they belong.
Chester Puller rolls over.
Posted by: tim at October 27, 2006 01:06 PM (nno0f)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
BITTERSWEET
I don't clean up my blog email inbox very often, so I have lots of old emails spanning my blogging career. But just now I found one tucked away in a folder that was from three years ago this weekend. One that starts...
Interesting post. I am retired AF, former helicopter crew chief/flightmechanic/gunner who got an engineering degree then returned to the flightline as an aircraft maintenance officer.
My first contact with Bunker.
I feel his absence all the time. It's bittersweet for me to travel to Texas this weekend, because we had planned to someday meet. I know that if he were still alive, I would've gotten to meet him this weekend.
I'll still go meet him someday, just not the way I pictured it.
Posted by: Sarah at
11:24 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 128 words, total size 1 kb.
BAD TIMING
Darned Cardinals and their darned seven-game NLCS series and their darned rain delays. Now I've got a major dilemma on my hands.
This weekend I'll be at the SpouseBUZZ conference at Fort Hood. I'm very excited about participating in this panel, and I know it will be fun to meet fellow bloggers and hear their stories. But I also know that half my mind will be focused on the darned World Series.
Of course, that's not as bad as my friend from college, who had a wedding to attend last Saturday. She spent most of the reception with her face pressed against the reception hall window, trying to see the TV in the bar across the street! She says it should be illegal for people to get married during the World Series or March Madness.
I'd love for the Cardinals to just go ahead and win the thing, but I can't stand the thought of them winning the World Series while I'm 1000 miles away from my favorite Cards fan.
Anyway, if you're in the Fort Hood area and would like to say hi, I'll be at the SpouseBUZZ conference on Saturday. Should be a fun time. And let's pray for torrents of rain so the rest of the series gets postponed until next week.
Posted by: Sarah at
04:50 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 219 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I was going to go to the SpouseBuzz conference this Saturday, but my babysitter bailed on me. Hopefully y'all will have a good turn out since so many people are in the same situation as me with both 4th ID and 1st CAV deployed. I'm bummed, but maybe next time...
Posted by: Curly at October 27, 2006 02:18 AM (kQWmi)
2
Curly, please check out the SpouseBUZZ blog. I liveblogged the conference, so you can get all the info!
Posted by: Sarah at October 28, 2006 11:40 AM (akwIr)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
CHAIN OF THOUGHTS
I was thinking more this morning about
my post from yesterday. CaliValleyGirl and I may have grown up in wildly different zip codes, but I can't think of any values she and I don't have in common. Conversely, I know of several lefties who lived their whole lives in rural Missouri. I guess I'm no closer to figuring out what makes us embrace the politics we do.
And then thinking of California made me think of Tupac. Which made me think of my absolute favorite Dave Chappelle skit, one that makes me laugh even harder than Rick James. Maybe it's because I once dated a guy who was really into Tupac conspiracy theories. Yeah, I know, leave me alone.
Posted by: Sarah at
04:14 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 125 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Definately the best Chappelle skit ever:
"I wrote this song a long time ago
It was the dopest song I ever wrote in '94.
Now what can a brother do
When half the people voted for George W
It's a Bitch
George W...
Can't be true
I'm gonna choke him
'Cuz he's a snitch
I'm talkin' bout George W Smith
From City Council, he ran in '93
Out in Oakland
You probably didn't hear about him.
I wrote this song a LONG time AGO.."
Posted by: Will at October 26, 2006 12:08 PM (QRBGL)
2
ps - I thought chappelle depressed you.
Posted by: Will at October 26, 2006 01:19 PM (QRBGL)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
October 25, 2006
FISHBOWL
CaliValleyGirl is back in L.A. after living nine years in Germany. And she just took a trip to another planet: Alabama. You must go
read her post before you keep reading mine. Go on, git.
I went to college in rural Missouri, population 17,000. Interestingly enough, we had a pretty big foreign exchange community. And I had this exact conversation with a French exchange student. He was dismayed that our town in Missouri never showed any foreign films in the local movie theater, because the locals would benefit from learning about other countries. Our local movie theater had three screens. Three. I tried to explain to him that his idea was not a very sound business move for a rural movie theater, but he insisted that everyone in France is educated about the United States, so we should educate ourselves about France.
I asked him why he didn't study abroad in Finland. He got a little puzzled and said that he didn't really know anything about Finland. Well, don't they have a culture that's worth learning about? Why wasn't he interested in learning about Finland? If he wants rural Missourians to learn all about France, then shouldn't he spend some time learning about Finland? Of course it's a silly juxtaposition, but it made the point that Finland is out of his experience. Learning about Finland might be interesting in and of itself, but it does nothing to really affect his daily life or his future. He was in the US to learn English in order to hopefully get ahead in the business world. What would it help him to learn about Finland, or a rural Missourian to see a French film? Not much in a practical sense.
Everyone wants others to know about and respect his culture. It's his, right? So it must be worth learning about! But "middle America" -- Jesusland, Flyover Country, Red States, or whatever you want to call us -- are really out of the average Californian or New Yorker's experience. I can't really fault them for not knowing about us, any more than I can fault a Frenchie for not knowing about Finland, but we do make up a big freakin' chunk of the country.
I have never been to California or NYC. (Before my mom interjects, I disclose that I went to NYC as an infant, but that hardly counts for my point here.) All I know about L.A. and New York comes from TV, the same way Europeans learn about the US. The disconnect is that my entire US experience, the America that I know, comes from living in Oklahoma, Texas, Illinois, Missouri, Kentucky, and South Carolina. That's the US I know, and it's quite different from CaliValleyGirl's US (living in Hawaii and California).
I'm happy she visited my version of the US. I'd like to visit her version someday too. I think it can help us establish common ground, which would be good for all 300 billion of us.
Posted by: Sarah at
05:28 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 499 words, total size 3 kb.
1
Several years ago we took a trip up Hwy 1 in California, Oregon and Washington. Most the time while we were in California, until we reached extreme Northern California, my husband kept saying, "I feel like I'm in a foreign country". I just recognized we were in California, and I didn't realize how much discomfort he was feeling about it until we reached extreme N Calif and he told me how relaxed he was and felt he was back in the USA. I get the same feeling when in Boulder, CO. We've lived on the East Coast in a couple of different areas, and several on the Gulf Coast all of course, in the South.
Posted by: Ruth H at October 25, 2006 07:37 AM (Y77sF)
2
million... 300 million...
Posted by: Will at October 25, 2006 10:56 AM (QRBGL)
3
Whoops. What is this, China?
Posted by: Sarah at October 25, 2006 04:20 PM (7Wklx)
4
You and I have sooooo much common ground, Sarah...but my boyfriend and I also always make a big deal of the little differences. For example, before saying goodbye to me in Germany, my bf sat me in front of the computer and made me read some personal safety website about how to identify and avoid dangerous situations...I think he would feel best if I had and carried a gun. I think he really thinks that I would need it 24/7 here in LA. Anyhoo, America is great...loving every minute being back home!
Posted by: CaliValleyGirl at October 25, 2006 09:32 PM (deur4)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
October 24, 2006
ON TO GAME 4
Woohoo, the voodoo doll worked!
Go Cards!
Posted by: Sarah at
06:40 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 15 words, total size 1 kb.
WHY VOTING MATTERS
Bleak House: Republicans deserve to lose, but what happens if Democrats win?
First, Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi has promised that election of a Democratic House would insure "a rollback of the [Bush] tax cuts." Rep. Charles Rangel of New York, who would be chairman of the Ways and Means Committee, would make sure no tax cut extension bill would ever get to the floor. He voted against the 2001 and 2003 Bush tax cuts and the bill that later extended the tax cuts until 2010 (as did all but seven of the 205 Democratic House members). In September Mr. Rangel said that he "cannot think of one" Bush tax cut he would agree to renew.
Investors Business Daily recently pointed out that since the Bush tax cuts took effect in 2003, "the economy has added $1.26 trillion in real output, $14.4 trillion in net wealth and 5.8 million new jobs." But that progress doesn't seem to matter to the liberals, whose primary goal is to raise income tax rates. "Taxing the rich" will be the leading economic argument of a 2007 Democratic House, and a rollback tax bill of some kind will reach the floor.
Second, President Bush will not be able to re-energize his effort for individually owned Social Security accounts, for "preventing the privatization of social security" is in the Democratic National Committee's "6-Point Plan for 2006." Democrats don't trust people to own or invest their own retirement funds--better to let a wise government do that, for as socialist Noam Chomsky says, "putting people in charge of their own assets breaks down the solidarity that comes from doing something together." And since Congress gets to spend Social Security tax receipts that aren't needed to pay benefits, letting people invest their payments in their own retirement accounts would be a costly revenue reduction that the new, bigger-spending Congress won't allow to happen.
Via Instapundit. Yikes. Read the remaining points. Double yikes.
Posted by: Sarah at
11:31 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 327 words, total size 2 kb.
1
But reflect on this: the very people saying these things are confident that they're going to sweep into power and sweep the Republicans out. Why? How can they be so sure that there are enough lunatics out there to accomplish that miracle? Mark Foley?
(By the way, your anti-whatever filter keeps rejecting my E-mail address and URL because it ends with dot-info. What on Earth is wrong with dot-info domains?)
Posted by: Francis W. Porretto at October 24, 2006 12:41 PM (PzL/5)
2
Unfortunately, I share a whatever-filter with about a hundred other mu.nu bloggers, so whatever one filters, we all filter. Sorry. But no worries, I know who you are!
Posted by: Sarah at October 24, 2006 04:58 PM (7Wklx)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
JUJU
Well, I didn't make it to the store or the post office or anything else I was going to do yesterday, but I did finish knitting a Detroit voodoo doll all in one day.
Heh. Go Cardinals!
Posted by: Sarah at
03:39 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 39 words, total size 1 kb.
1
so whaT'S THE PUNCTURING WEAPON, HERE?...A KNITTING NEEDLE????lol....
Posted by: debey at October 24, 2006 02:57 PM (li+W/)
2
I do think the "dirtgate" thing is being waaaaaaaay overplayed by the media. I played high school baseball and even then it was pretty much common knowledge that on those bitter cold early April days the pitchers were likely to be "loading" the ball. I for one took comfort in that fact as the idea of facing a guy with an eighty-eight mile an hour fast ball with no control frankly scared the crap out of me.
My theory on why LaRussa wasn't more adamant about the umps inspecting Rogers is because he knows Leyland could do the same to his pitchers. Now I happen to be a serious fan of both of these managers, and to me the way LaRussa handled it is exactly the way WE ALL should be handling it.
Posted by: BubbaBoBobBrain at October 24, 2006 03:13 PM (8ruhu)
3
Bubba -- We're currently watching Game 3 with a Detroit fan, and though there's lots of ribbing back and forth about "dirt", I'm not really worried about it.
Posted by: Sarah at October 24, 2006 04:59 PM (7Wklx)
4
that would make a scary looking christmas tree ornament!
Posted by: annika at October 24, 2006 06:01 PM (qQD4Q)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
October 23, 2006
SAD
I wrote
before about how much I love the stained glass window in the chapel on our old post. Now, according to my old neighbor, they're getting rid of it and designing a new one. I hope they keep the old one intact and put it somewhere else. For whatever reason, that window touches my heart in a way I can't describe.
Posted by: Sarah at
06:22 AM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
Post contains 64 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Wow! It was bittersweet to see this post again. I never wrote you when you originally posted this, though I read it at the time, but that post/photo was from the service of my husband's cousin's (we call her "Bim") son, Martin Kondor. Our daughter, too, was posted in Germany & went to Iraq from there. That's how I found you, through Tim & Capt. Patty. Our Sarah was part of 1AD.
Some days the world seems so big, and on others it seems so small. Thanks for reminding me how blessed I am, my daughter came home safely. Keep up the good work!
Posted by: beckie at October 23, 2006 01:02 PM (GIL7z)
2
P.S.
If you still have any contacts there that could follow-up on this & find out if there are plans to preserve the windows, or, if not, if there is any way we could start a fund to "buy" the windows & then find another appropriate place on base to put them, I'd be honored to contribute. Or maybe a more contemporary church off base that would host them? I know the church we attended near my daughter's base in Wackernheim ministered to many, many military families & would have welcomed such a "gift."
Posted by: beckie at October 23, 2006 01:46 PM (GIL7z)
3
Wow. I always loved that stained glass window. Sadly, I was usually only in the chapel for memorial services, which made the window that much more poignant. I agree with you; I hope they find an appropriate place to display it.
Posted by: Robin at October 23, 2006 04:49 PM (6G8cC)
4
Beckie, I will do my best to have some people look into it. A friend emailed yesterday and said that the reason they're removing the windows is completely asinine, in my opinion. Someone complained that there's a "subliminal cow" in the pattern of the stained glass, so the window has to go. Of all the ridiculous... I'll see if I can find out what they're doing with the old window, but if this is the case, there may not be much hope for salvaging the window.
I'm so sorry about your family's loss. And I'm glad your Sarah is home safe.
Posted by: Sarah at October 24, 2006 09:26 AM (7Wklx)
5
subliminal COW? Any way of emailing me a better photo of that window? That is a wild issue!
Posted by: beckie at October 24, 2006 01:29 PM (GIL7z)
6
A subliminal COW? Are you kidding me?? Some people will find any possible reason to complain.
Posted by: Robin at October 24, 2006 05:56 PM (6G8cC)
7
The story has it that the artist who orginally designed the mural was Hindu. And the cow or ox is a sacred animal. I will see what I can find out before we go.
Posted by: Jennifer at October 24, 2006 09:05 PM (oLbnP)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
PUPDATE
I was asked for a pupdate, which is something I will always oblige. So here the stinker is, cute as can be, snuggled up with his squeeky toy. And it's a good thing he's cute, because yesterday he ate through the apartment mini-blinds like they were made of ham.
Posted by: Sarah at
06:06 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 51 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I think it's time you had a visit from the Dog Whisperer. If you haven't watched that, you should. Very interesting. It's on the National Geographic channel. He had a dog on that ate a WHOLE couch.
Yummy.
Posted by: Ruth H at October 23, 2006 12:01 PM (xAE2s)
2
Seriously, Ruth, I can't watch The Dog Whisperer without feeling major failings as a pet owner. The vet told me a few weeks ago that my dog is neurotic, which just kills me. I wish I knew what to do about it.
Posted by: Sarah at October 23, 2006 01:04 PM (7Wklx)
3
Thank you Sarah! I don't know why,but I love this
little guy. I think it was a combination of his
taking the oath of citizenship and the picture
of his feet sticking out from beneath your bed.
What can I say? I'm a fan!
Posted by: MaryIndiana at October 24, 2006 07:23 PM (YwdKL)
4
Oh dang it all he' so cute. Just keep on being consistant in your disciple. My fluffball is a good dog but she never or rarely comes when called and has "issues" with some of her bathroom habits. Some things have leveled off over the years and some drive me batty.
Posted by: toni at October 26, 2006 02:48 PM (MNSlE)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
ABOVE MY PAY GRADE
Yesterday I posted
food for thought. Today I post the other side of the argument:
If we had known then...
If We Knew Then...
You wanna know what I think? I think I'm not smart enough to know.
I too thought of the idea of hindsight when I read Goldberg's article. Tactical mistakes were made during the Civil War and WWII, yet we look back on those two as wild successes. I just don't know how time will look back on Iraq. Someday when all of this is a short paragraph in a high school history textbook, what will that paragraph say?
I don't have all the answers to the War on Terror. I rely on my husband, who's been in two of the three Axis of Evil countries, to give me his informed opinion. I trust our government has far more information than I could ever have about the situation. And I go with my gut and hope that in the end my gut was right.
That doesn't mean I don't have doubts. I constantly refer to the Seven Signs of Non-Competitive States. I think that has a major bearing on whether democracy can work in the Middle East. Reading LGF does nothing to bolster my confidence. But despite my doubts, I still think that Saddam Hussein had to go.
I've just been feeling lately that I shouldn't talk above my pay grade. And isn't that mostly what blogging is? I don't have any delightful insight that you people need to read. Sure, I have an opinion on the CNN sniper video and Ted Kennedy offering to help the Soviets. But my opinion is nothing you can't read at Blackfive or Cold Fury, respectively. I think the New York Times is crap for their recent whoopsie, I think it's ridiculous to assume there's institutionalized racism at Cracker Barrel, and I think we need to have a serious investigation into Dirt-gate.
But what do I know anyway...
Posted by: Sarah at
03:32 AM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 335 words, total size 3 kb.
1
Maybe you aren't smart enough, maybe you are. Who is to tell? What makes you think that the people making policy decisions are any smarter than you are? They may have different information, they may have access to better information than you. They may have different experiences or skillsets or talents, but don't sell yourself short in this fashion. After all, our collective ignorance blunders on despite our individual shortcomings, and we tend to work things out regardless of the obstacles that seem to loom so large.
Posted by: Deskmerc at October 23, 2006 05:28 AM (Qlh7l)
2
Funny that you should refer to Peters' "Seven Signs of Non-Competitive States." Every one of the indicators he mentions now applies to the United States under the Bushista NeoCon regime. Perhaps you were operating at a several pay grades higher than you lay claim to when you wrote today's blog without even knowing it.
Posted by: PrahaPartizan at October 23, 2006 05:30 AM (hGxBy)
3
Where you come up with that assessment, PrahaPartizan, is beyond my comprehension.
Posted by: Sarah at October 23, 2006 05:59 AM (7Wklx)
4
I like that. "Bushista NeoCon regime". Where did this idea that you could label something and make it so by pointing to the label? Chomsky?
Posted by: Deskmerc at October 23, 2006 07:57 AM (Qlh7l)
5
Sarah,
It sounds like you're retiring from political discourse. Or maybe you're just in a funk today. But if you really want people to just read stuff at Blackfive or Cold Fury instead, don't use the excuse that you're not smart enough to know. Since when did a PhD impress Americans? Hopefully never. All you need is plain common sense here. Also, what's this pay-grade nonsense about? A lot of certified idiots make millions of dollars, and a lot of geniuses fade into obscurity, sometimes self-imposing it. So stop with the "talking at your pay grade" business. I think you should say whatever you want. I would defend your right to do so. Bush probably wouldn't, but I would.
Now, Jacoby on the other hand.. I find it interesting that in all of Jeff Jacoby's trumpeting of past American wars, he forgets one very important one - Vietnam. Or maybe he doesn't forget at all.. Maybe he'd just rather talk about the Ardennes offensive in 1944 because everybody likes World War 2! Right on! We riotously KICKED ASS! Yeah! Well of course we did. But, oh yeah, Vietnam... hmmm... better not talk about that one... it was one of those wars we fought AFTER are leaders became imperialists, and that has no relevance to the current war.. well, not as much as the Battle of the Bulge in 1944 does, right?
Even today, you guys still don't get why Iraq is a mistake. It's not a mistake because we're doing "badly" militarily. If we were fighting a riotous war, we could take 50000 deaths a day and we'd still fight on until the last able-bodied American was dead. Iraq is a mistake because it's not riotous. What we're doing there is for the personal gain of a few, not the many. This ain't 1812 or 1944 or 1991 even. We're on the wrong side of history guys, so let's stop fucking arguing about it and do something to improve ourselves.
Lastly, about the Seven Factors: You can easily find ways in which America, especially conservative America, fails at each of these factors. However, I don't feel that America is a non-competitive state. This leads me to believe that the 7 factors can be applied to any country you want to justify yourself.
Posted by: Will at October 23, 2006 11:23 AM (QRBGL)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
October 22, 2006
LIFE IMITATES ART
Woah. It's a real-life
John Doe! I wonder if this guy knows how many dimples there are in a golf ball...
Posted by: Sarah at
02:14 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 27 words, total size 1 kb.
1
http://anticollective.blogspot.com/2006/10/how-i-saved-world.html
Posted by: I at November 03, 2006 04:30 AM (Z9Jj/)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
FOOD FOR THOUGHT
A thread worth reading:
Iraq Was a Worthy Mistake
Ace's response to Goldberg
The comments are worth a glance too.
Posted by: Sarah at
04:31 AM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 26 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Good articles, Sarah.
Now, knowing that I'll probably get a smart-ass comment from Will, I am hesitant to say this, but I've started feeling a shift in my attitude towards the war in Iraq. I'm not necessarily against it, but I feel like maybe we were too hasty in going in the first place. But maybe I feel like that because I'm constantly bombarded by anti-everything-hippies here in the great Northwest. I don't know. Maybe it's because I think we may have bitten off more than we can chew. Regardless, we're there now. I still stand by the fact that it would be an even bigger mistake to leave than it would be to finish what we started.
Posted by: Erin at October 22, 2006 09:54 AM (023Of)
2
I'm just happy that people are coming around on the issue, even if it's in such a back-handed way. It's taken far too long. In 2003, something like 65% of Americans (probably most of them conservatives) thought Saddam perpetrated 9/11. Almost everyone thought he had WMDs. And a lot of people, at least all the neocons, actually thought that an occupying army led by George W. Bush would be perceived as a liberating force. Come ON PEOPLE! There's no way Bush can promote a "liberal society in the heart of the Arab and Muslim world" when he can't even promote a liberal society back home. (widespread civilian phone surveillance, patriot act, military tribunals, torture, rendition, using homophobia as a voting tactic, erasing the seperation of church and state, consolidating all power into the executive branch, etc, etc, etc, etc, I'm so sick of it all.)
Anyway, what we need to do now is get out of Iraq (not that we're going to be able to - Goldberg's "vote" idea is stupid beyond comprehension) and we need to get back into Afghanistan in a big way. The taliban is far from dead, and it's imperative that we make them dead, now. Too many troops, especially Canadian soldiers who are footing the bill right now, are dying in our justified and unfinished war against terrorists in Afghanistan. Rumsfield left the CIA (the ones calling in the airstrikes in Tora Bora) out to dry in the fall of 2001, because he only cared about occupying Iraq - we have to fire that son of a bitch first, and get the military back from the crazy PNACs.
Lastly, I just want to say that the Pacific Northwest is the greatest place in the world - it's like living on the moon of Endor, surrounded by left-leaning ewoks.
Posted by: Will at October 22, 2006 11:02 AM (QRBGL)
3
Do the smelly hippies get any credit for knowing three and a half years ago what the good and wise Republicans are finding out just now? Well, of course not. Bush wasn't a conservative anyway. He was an imposter,a liberal Manchurian canditate. Conservatisim can't fail, it can only be failed.
No matter what happens in November conservatives are preparing to throw Bush out of the life boat. They have to pretend they never knew him.
Posted by: I'm sorry too at October 22, 2006 04:17 PM (3SfHh)
4
Let's say a president wants to go to war.When considering force requirements, he ignores the advise of the Secretary of the Army, the Chief of Staff of the Army, and the Secretary of State, who was a former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. Shouldn't this man be considered our Churchill? This generation's Truman?
Posted by: I'm sorry too at October 22, 2006 04:39 PM (3SfHh)
Posted by: I'm sorry too at October 23, 2006 04:12 PM (i1pLJ)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
110kb generated in CPU 0.0278, elapsed 0.1089 seconds.
64 queries taking 0.09 seconds, 293 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.