July 31, 2006
KINGDOM OF NONSENSE
We got HBO when we moved back to the US, so we've been trying to catch up on movies that we missed while we were in Germany. So far we've been unimpressed with most of them that we've seen:
A History of Violence (too creepy),
Elephant (too existentialist),
War of the Worlds (too Dakota), and most recently,
Kingdom of Heaven.
Roger Ebert writes:
The Muslim scholar Hamid Dabashi, however, after being asked to consult on the movie, writes in the new issue of Sight & Sound: "It was neither pro- nor anti-Islamic, neither pro- nor anti-Christian. It was, in fact, not even about the 'Crusades.'" And yet I consider the film to be a profound act of faith." It is an act of faith, he thinks, because for its hero Balian (Orlando Bloom), who is a non-believer, "All religious affiliations fade in the light of his melancholic quest to find a noble purpose in life."
That's an insight that helps me understand my own initial question about the film, which was: Why don't they talk more about religion? Weren't the Crusades seen by Christians as a Holy War to gain control of Jerusalem from the Muslims? I wondered if perhaps Scott was evading the issue. But not really: He shows characters more concerned with personal power and advancement than with theological issues.
And that's precisely why I didn't like the movie. Orlando Bloom comes off sounding more like a modern campus activist than someone from 1184. His rally speech sounded like a debate on reparations, not the Holy Crusades:
It has fallen to us, to defend Jerusalem, and we have made our preparations as well as they can be made. None of us took this city from Muslims. No Muslim of the great army now coming against us was born when this city was lost. We fight over an offence we did not give, against those who were not alive to be offended. What is Jerusalem? Your holy palaces lie over the Jewish temple that the Romans pulled down. The Muslim places of worship lie over yours. Which is more holy? The wall? The Mosque? The Sepulchre? Who has claim? No one has claim. All have claim!
If Ridley Scott set out to make a movie where the premise is "all religions are equally dumb," then he succeeded. Because it sure wasn't a movie about the Crusades. It just wasn't really what I expected, but in hindsight, I don't know why I was surprised: it's so typical in 2006 to expect a movie where all people could live in harmony if white Europeans would just let them be. Oh, and where the Muslims win the battle of Helm's Deep. I should've seen it coming.
Posted by: Sarah at
07:50 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 460 words, total size 3 kb.
1
Well for many of us ALL RELIGIONS ARE STUPID. The creation stories promoted by these religions make no more sense than the "Flying Spaghetti Monster" theory. Religion is the main impedement to the human species getting along.
Posted by: BubbaBoBobBrain at July 31, 2006 05:25 PM (8ruhu)
2
A really great film would have attempted to re-create for the viewer the world in which religion was the dominant aspect of life, and help them understand the conflict as its protagonists saw it.
Simply transporting modern attitudes back in time is a trivial exercise.
Posted by: david foster at August 01, 2006 07:12 PM (WWPKp)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
July 30, 2006
GROWING UP
An interesting article via Instapundit:
A Nation of Wimps: "Parents are going to ludicrous lengths to take the bumps out of life for their children. However, parental hyperconcern has the net effect of making kids more fragile; that may be why they're breaking down in record numbers."
I've managed to connect to one of the least pertinent parts of the article, but I couldn't help but notice this paragraph:
Adulthood no longer begins when adolescence ends, according to a recent report by University of Pennsylvania sociologist Frank F. Furstenberg and colleagues. There is, instead, a growing no-man's-land of postadolescence from 20 to 30, which they dub "early adulthood." Those in it look like adults but "haven't become fully adult yet—traditionally defined as finishing school, landing a job with benefits, marrying and parenting—because they are not ready or perhaps not permitted to do so."
Using the classic benchmarks of adulthood, 65 percent of males had reached adulthood by the age of 30 in 1960. By contrast, in 2000, only 31 percent had. Among women, 77 percent met the benchmarks of adulthood by age 30 in 1960. By 2000, the number had fallen to 46 percent.
Granted, I've only grown up in one era, so I can't really compare my entry into adulthood in the 2000s with someone else's decades ago, but I can't help but feel that people my age are sometimes hopelessly immature.
The husband and I went to a party relatively recently, a housewarming picnic for a couple who just bought their first house. We didn't know any of the couples at the party, so we did a lot of watching on the sidelines, and as darkness fell, so did IQs. By the end of the evening, we stared wide-eyed as married women lifted up their skirts and flashed their thongs to distract single men during their men vs women beer pong game. Yes, you read that right. This party at a 30-something's new house in the suburbs turned into a night that rivaled anything I saw in college. And then of course we sat horrified as people grabbed another beer for the road and drove home.
These people all supposedly had jobs and relationships and should've been considered adults, but I've never felt more out-of-place or uncomfortable in my life. I'm not above admitting that I did some wild and foolish things in my college years, but that part of my life is far in the past now. These couples seemed to be having just another weekend of fun.
I have no idea if their behavior has anything to do with their upbringing or parents. I could speculate that it might have something to do with not being quite ready to be adults yet. I hear that the whole "failure to launch" thing is a real phenomenon in the US, and that people are less and less emotionally and financially ready to grow up than ever before. Could that be a reason why you'd flash your boobs at some random guy while your husband makes another trip to the keg? Is the world too big and scary to leave the comfort of the Fun College Years? I can't say I understand this, since I love every candle I add to my birthday cake; my husband and I constantly play a game where we imagine what we'll do when he retires and we're older and cooler.
I hope I can teach my children someday that growing up is one of the best things you can do. I'm trying to read articles like this and prepare myself, because I want to do whatever it takes so that my child isn't the one lifting her skirt at a housewarming party...
Posted by: Sarah at
09:51 AM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
Post contains 623 words, total size 4 kb.
1
WHAT?????
Reading this post has made me feel even better about having my 11 year old do his own laundry and teaching him how to cook. As well as having him read the moral compass every day and do essays on what he read even though it is summer break. I was begining to think that maybe his long list of chores and multiple responsibilities were to much but now I might add some things. Ant will be thanking you later in life. LOL
Posted by: Kelly at July 30, 2006 11:11 AM (q+rrW)
2
I think of some of this trend could be attributed to our society's increasing love of youth. I guess it could also explain related phenomena...like seeing 40-year-old women wearing teeny bop clothing or seeing old geezers driving tiny sports cars...America loves youth.
Posted by: Nicole at July 31, 2006 03:33 PM (nTCFk)
Posted by: Nicole at July 31, 2006 03:34 PM (nTCFk)
4
My grandsons, ages 23 and 27, are having a hard time keeping moved out of the home; a hard time growing up. I don't know about others but my daughter wasn't raised to raise kids like that. But her husband had PTSS or whatever, from Vietnam and was not a good husband or father. He is now getting help and we really wish it could extend to the whole family because they are really mixed up. But a lot of their friends are the same. It's a mystery to me, I cannot imagine me or my children wanting to be around each other that much. They want the comforts of home without the responsibility. AARRGH!!
Posted by: Ruth H at August 01, 2006 03:29 PM (gqQRq)
5
I was talking about the whole children being kept in bubble-wrap thing with my bf just a few days ago. When I was 5 years old, I was hammering shingles into the roof of our new house (only one storey) with a hammer, while my 9 year old brother was using the air nail-gun. My brothers were fully capable of using table saws and other wood working equipment at early ages, because of my father's wood working business. Now had child services ever gotten wind of this stuff, we would have surely be taken away from our parents, because of child endangerment. However, we were never in danger, since our parents taught us how to use those things. In fact, out of four kids, only one of us ever had a broken bone: my brother broke his pinkie body surfing. Otherwise, there was never any major accident that any of us ever had.
I was also talking to a soldier in my bf's unit, and he was telling me how it was his job as a 9 year old, when he came home from school everyday, to shoot ducks, to keep them from landing in his father's corn field. A 9 year old with a shotgun? most would ask. However, if you teach a child responsibility and give them the mental tools to actually be able to handle things, they will rise to the occasion.
Posted by: CaliValleyGirl at August 01, 2006 11:09 PM (+L0w3)
6
Your post reminded me of a conversation I had with a mom in NC about six years ago. I asked her if her 16 year old daughter did any babysitting. Her answer was: No, she doesn't work because we really want her to relax and enjoy life before she goes on to college and the adult world of working.
I was speechless(which is rare). When I was 16, I was working part-time after school at a law firm AND babysitting on the weekends. I loved being financially independent ~ as much as a 16 year can be. I still wonder how that teenager, now 21, is doing. I'd bet the farm she is still in the safe cocoon of mommmy.
Posted by: Patti at August 02, 2006 01:30 PM (7bY11)
7
It's not just the parents. There are lots of institutionalized ways we are softening up our kids. Schools that don't administer tests or grades becuase kids shouldn't be judged don't help.
I had several "discussions" with administrators in my kids' school who didn't like the testing requirements mandated by "No Child Left Behind" because "some kids just don't test well."
Hello?
Posted by: Lou at August 04, 2006 03:25 AM (0+7qK)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
July 28, 2006
5 THINGS
Saw this a couple of places.
Five things in my purse
1. coupons
2. chapstick
3. Big Red One pen
4. Charlie's old dog tag
5. the wallet Angie Dente tossed out when she moved
Five things in my refrigerator
1. box of wine
2. pre-sliced mushrooms (I don't even have to cut them myself in this country!)
3. Big K Diet Cherry Soda (yep, we're such misers that we drink generic cola)
4. string cheese
5. Reeses Cup cheesecake bites
Five things in my car
1. air freshener
2. a towel to cover the steering wheel so it's not in direct sunlight
3. jumper cables
4. Really, that's it; I hate extra stuff in the car
5.
Five things in my closet
Five? Just FIVE? We lost about 700 sq feet in this move, and we're moving again in less than five months so nearly everything we own is in a closet. I just sent Erin a photo of our two hilarious closets. I don't know if you can properly tell from the photo, but these are huge walk-in closets. Or at least they're meant to be, unless you cram them to the brim.
Yes, that's right, look at all that yarn. And that's not even the stuff I was whittling away for the bears...
Posted by: Sarah at
12:01 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 221 words, total size 1 kb.
DER WALMART
We heard today on CNBC that
Walmart is pulling out of Germany. Apparently it can't compete with Aldi on groceries and has lost about a billion dollars there. Yikes. There was no Walmart in our region of Germany, so I never went. Actually, we passed one once and were excited, but then we realized it was Sunday and thus it was closed. I should've taken a picture; have you ever seen a closed Walmart?
I also got a kick out of this description of why Walmart didn't work in Germany:
To American eyes, the new ethics manual is standard stuff. But when Wal-Mart Stores Inc. distributed the newly translated code to German employees a few weeks ago, it caused a furor. They read a caution against supervisor-employee relationships as a puritanical ban on interoffice romance, while a call to report improper behavior was taken as an invitation to rat on co-workers.
...
Rivals continue to chuckle about the customer reaction when, initially, Wal-Mart offered services such as grocery bagging. It turned out that Germans didn't want strangers handling their groceries. And when clerks followed orders to smile at shoppers, male customers took it as a come-on.
I still can't put Walmart and Germany in the same sentence without remembering that German haircutter who complained to my husband that she couldn't walk around in an American Walmart in just a bra. Hilarious. Some stuff just doesn't cross cultural lines; I guess Walmart and Germany simply weren't made to mix...
Posted by: Sarah at
11:47 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 252 words, total size 2 kb.
1
When Walmart came to Germany, it did so by buying Wertkauf, a Germany supermarket chain. And then it slowly turned all Wertkauf locations into Walmarts and then some. I can remember reading articles about Walmart's troubles when they first opened. They interviewed customers, and I can remember someone saying they didn't like it when the meeter and greeter welcomed them, because they just aren't used to that in Germany. Also, the bagging just didn't work...however, they did offer free plastic bags, which is a totally anomaly in Germany, and most customers loved this. I was just at Walmart a few weeks ago with my mother, and it was amusing because there was an older cashier checking us out, and you could tell that she was guarding the old status quo...and there were no bags out...so I asked for them, and she begrudingly took out a few for me. But she didn't, like the younger cashier next to her, put out the whole pile, free for anyone to take and use as they please. It was like she secretly despised that Walmart tradition and was intent on not giving out free bags. Too bad they are closing...but I have to say, I love ALDI. Cheap, quick, and they have the most awesome capitalist system for their employees...makes Walmart almost look socialist. And you rarely meet a disgruntled ALDI employee...they are worked hard, but they earn more money than their counterparts in other supermarkets.
Posted by: calivalleygirl at July 31, 2006 06:10 AM (rynoq)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
July 27, 2006
ALL TEDDIED OUT
OK, I think I'm a little burnt out on teddies for the moment. I suppose that's what happens when you make six of them in two weeks. As you can see, I got more creative as time went on, and I certainly got better at embroidering their faces! The green one is my favorite; it was my first attempt at a fair isle pattern, so I learned a lot about pulling too tight, and also about what happens when you accidentally read the chart backwards for a row. I'll send off my teddies to
Mother Bear Project soon. And maybe I'll make another den of bears when the urge strikes again!
(P.S. The maroon one has a really cool cable pattern that doesn't show up at all in the photo.)
Posted by: Sarah at
03:39 PM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
Post contains 136 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: Jill at July 27, 2006 04:55 PM (VZQjF)
2
gotta love the bears!!!BUT....did you use up all the scrap yarn????
Posted by: debey at July 27, 2006 06:32 PM (Hyowy)
3
Sarah,
Those are adorable! You did a great job on them, and I know they'll get lots of TLC when they arrive at their destination.
Love,
Mama
Posted by: Nancy at July 27, 2006 07:24 PM (SHVUj)
4
Sarah... OH MY GOSH!!!
My dad taped some Knitty Gritty shows after you were talking about them - and I was so excited that he got the "Knitting for Peace" one.
I am amazed at the fair isle pattern
The green one is definitely my favorite, too.
Your own "Knitsters" miss you a lot.
Posted by: The Girl at July 27, 2006 08:04 PM (qBefm)
Posted by: Kalroy at July 27, 2006 09:56 PM (9RG5y)
6
How much would you charge to make one of these cuties for my one year old niece? I'm serious, e-mail me and let me know!
Posted by: Oda Mae at July 28, 2006 02:51 AM (FmIVz)
7
Love the blue and white one on the far right.
He's clearly a referee of some sort of Bear
Football League. TOUCHDOWN!
Charlie isn't trying to eat these,is he?
Posted by: MaryIndiana at July 28, 2006 03:40 AM (YwdKL)
8
Dang. I stay away for a few days, and I'm totally behind on your blog!
The bears are awesome though! I can't wait to start some of my own!
Posted by: Erin at July 29, 2006 11:20 AM (idTPW)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
SAD
The husband and I have been watching some old Ali G shows on TV lately. We're always amazed at the utter garbage that he can get people to say; I can't believe that the guests don't smell a rat. My husband also constantly wonders about
The Daily Show and
The Colbert Report, how they can trick their guests into sounding so stupid. I guess I know part of the reason now:
Wexler falls into a comedic interviewer's trap -- and he's not laughing. I feel sorry for the people who do these shows because they come off looking like complete idiots. Ali G isn't even fun to watch, because who really wants to see someone make Buzz Aldrin look like a fool?
Posted by: Sarah at
04:59 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 124 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Okay - fuck politics Sarah. Let's talk TV:
Neither Ali G, the Daily show NOR The Colbert Report "trick" their guests into sounding stupid. These shows invite guests/politicians on, which the guests/politicians accept because they want the exposure and think it's only a comedy, and then these shows merely throw the guests/politicians off by asking real questions.
Remember when Colbert asked that Republican Senator (the one who was wanting the ten commandments displayed in court rooms) to actually NAME the ten commandments. THE GUY DIDN'T KNOW THEM! That's not tricking somebody into sounding stupid - that's letting somebody who sounds stupid anyway just speak.
They don't "smell" Ali G because he doesn't "smell." And certainly, if he did, it wouldn't be like a rat. It would probabaly be a British cologne of some sort.
Ali G merely brings out the obvious about his guests. And guess what? If you're smart, you LOOK SMART. I've seen it a million times on his show. If you actually are well grounded and know what you're talking about, that's how it looks. If you're an idiot- if you're a bunch of rednecks at a country bar - then Ali G will simply reflect how stupid you are. Did you catch the episode where he plays music at a country bar in Utah (I think) with a guitar rendition of "Throw the Jew Down the Well so my Country can be Free" ? The crowd sings along and loves it. They're unknowing rednecks.
Also, that latest Colbert thing. NEWSFLASH: Wexler is actually smart and has a good sense of humour. This is exactly what the segment looks like to rational people. Only the knee-jerk idiots think Wexler performed badly. Colbert made him look GOOD.
Sad?? Don't be sad Sarah. Everyone else is laughing.
Posted by: Will at July 27, 2006 02:28 PM (eIQfa)
2
Will,
You have such a nasty, cynical, belligerent attitude. I enjoy good old-fashioned debate and differences of opinion, but you just get downright ornery. Wish you'd tone it down a bit. There's no need to be so angry-sounding.
Sarah's Mom
Posted by: Nancy at July 27, 2006 07:32 PM (SHVUj)
Posted by: Will at July 27, 2006 08:39 PM (eIQfa)
4
One of the biggest assets a personal website can have is the faithful readership and participation of the author's mom.
It works for me, anyway. =)
Sig
Posted by: Sig at July 28, 2006 04:45 AM (fretz)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
WAR OF THE WORLDS
Last night we watched the movie
War of the Worlds. I read the book shortly before we moved and loved it. But the movie added a twist that H.G. Wells never intended: Spielberg made the main character a father. The book was about what one man will do to survive. I used to lie in bed and wonder if I'd have the strength: Could I forage for raw potatoes to eat? Could I kill and eat a stray dog? Could I kill a man who became a threat to my survival? The book made me think about all these things, because the main character was such a powerful figure. In the movie, however, the main character thinks only of
protecting his children, a vastly different concept. One reviewer
said, "Leave it to Steven Spielberg to turn the end of the world into a treatise on responsible parenting." A man will
not do whatever it takes to survive if it means harming his child. The stakes were totally different in the movie, and I prefered the childless protagonist. (Also, if I had to hear Dakota Fanning scream one more time, I thought I was going to beat her senseless.)
Posted by: Sarah at
02:34 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 206 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I thought the original movie was better.
Posted by: Jim - PRS at July 27, 2006 11:15 PM (VPbK+)
2
Like Jim I only will watch the original - no movie is as good as a book, but the old one was really good sci-fi fun for back in the day.
Posted by: Teresa at July 28, 2006 11:38 AM (jgXyO)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
July 26, 2006
AWESOME
My dad fishes every single day he can. Christmas too. But he got his biggest catch ever over the weekend: a 22-pounder!
Now he just has to catch one as big as Kelly's dad's fish.
Posted by: Sarah at
11:54 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 37 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Awww. Your pop is a cutie.
Posted by: Erin at July 26, 2006 09:07 PM (vJSTT)
Posted by: Bob at July 27, 2006 10:05 AM (WMa4u)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
REUNION
Lileks attended his
high school reunion this weekend; I recently bought a plane ticket to my own. It was really hard to fill out the survey about what you've been doing since. When you know you're moving two months after the reunion, what do you put for address and phone number? What do you say your job is, what you did before or what you hope to do next? And when they ask how many places you've lived since high school, it's surreal to write 9.
I'm excited to go see people I haven't seen in at least six years, but the impending reunion has made it hard to get high school off my mind; I keep replaying stuff from school and wondering how I'd do it differently. I wouldn't want my life to turn out any differently now, but sometimes I wish I'd taken a different path to get here.
My school even has a reunion website. You can see me dead center, my eyes peeking out over the word "going". The bearded guy directly below me is now a Special Forces soldier; my husband and I are going to Bragg to visit him next weekend before he deploys again. And the girl up in the far left corner surprised my brother by being his doctor last year. It will be interesting to find out what everyone else has been up to.
Posted by: Sarah at
02:37 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 235 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Oh, C'MON!! Give us the link to your smiling, peeking face already!
Posted by: Oda Mae at July 26, 2006 04:48 AM (FmIVz)
2
Oh crap, I thought I did. I guess I didn't make the link correctly. I'll go try to fix it.
Posted by: Sarah at July 26, 2006 07:59 AM (YL5y0)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
July 22, 2006
ONE STEP FORWARD, TWO STEPS BACK
The other night I couldn't sleep, so my usual remedy is browsing knit blogs. I happened to find a wonderfully pertinent article on
knitting backwards; this will certainly come in handy while I'm addicted to making these bears. Now I don't have to flip my work over to purl anymore, which is definitely a timesaver on these tiny rows of ten. Hooray.
But I hit a small knitting snag last night. For dinner we made a fabulous pork tenderloin stuffed with mushrooms, bacon, and onion. For some reason our smoke detector goes off at the drop of a hat, so it started going off as I took the tenderloin out of the oven. I got flustered and, for no good reason whatsoever, decided to grab the meat thermometer and just pull it out with my hand. I was looking right at it, so I was well aware that it said 165 F but, whatever, pulling it out barehanded seemed like a good move. As I instinctively jerked my hand back and started hopping around the kitchen, I looked at my husband and said, "I really have no idea why I just did that." Luckily I didn't burn myself too bad, but the burn is perfectly located where I hold my yarn. I was doing this funky modified knitting move all evening long. It's not as sensitive today, so I can't wait to finish up Teddy #3. Actually, this should be Teddy #4, but #3 only has 3/4 of a head because I ran out of the ball of brown I was using. I've been debating for days whether I should go buy another matching skein of it, since the whole point of these bears is to whittle down these balls that have been sitting here for years, not to buy more!
Posted by: Sarah at
08:23 AM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
Post contains 313 words, total size 2 kb.
1
indeed -- biblical womanhood is so often confronted
with such dilemmas .... assuming you haven't already
been "raptured out" by the time I send this,
ask Jesus .... he knows all about knitting
Posted by: Xavier at July 22, 2006 02:56 PM (UvD9y)
Posted by: Sarah at July 22, 2006 04:24 PM (YL5y0)
3
Actually, making the bears to send to children in Africa is the point! Using up extra yarn is a bonus for you! Go buy another brown skein and make some little child very happy.
Love,
Mama
btw, hope your hand is feeling better.
Posted by: Nancy at July 22, 2006 09:25 PM (SHVUj)
4
Well you could buy another ball of yarn or depending where you left off you could change the color and make it look like a hat, I was trying to figure out a way to do that as well. As for the burn, I sure hope you are using silvadine or vitamin E liquid and anything that gets in the way of knitting SUCKS!!! Miss ya Kelly
Posted by: Kelly at July 24, 2006 08:26 PM (BtHGV)
5
P.S. Can I have that recipe? Sounds yummy!
Posted by: Kelly at July 24, 2006 08:28 PM (BtHGV)
6
Totally understand. Been doin it for years. Just finished welding on a part and I move or manipulate the metal with my bear hand. Or...glowing hot metal with just leather gloves.
Silly, I know, but it happens even to those who deal with heat professionally.
Kalroy
Posted by: Kalroy at July 24, 2006 09:37 PM (9RG5y)
7
Yeah Sarah, tell Jesus I said "what's up" while you're consulting him about knitting (who is Xavier, anyway?).
Anyway, sorry about your burn. I hope you get better soon...
Miss you.
Posted by: Erin at July 25, 2006 07:18 AM (5PAU6)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
July 21, 2006
SYMPATHY
There's no question that I support Israel in her current war. However, I do feel a sense of profound sadness for ordinary Lebanese people who don't support Hezbollah but are caught in a terrible battle in their own country. Via
Amritas via
Benjamin I found a blog called
Lebanese Political Journal that is mesmerizing.
A week ago, I might have told you that my heart broke because my favorite World Cup team lostÂ… I almost cried.
Now
I would do anything to watch my team lose - and bring down my sense of disappointment to that level again.
Follow these four Lebanese citizens as they try to grok.
Posted by: Sarah at
05:34 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 110 words, total size 1 kb.
DANG
I swear,
The Onion couldn't have made up a story this good:
Iran leader asks Germany for help on Zionism
Speaking of The Onion, we were watching the news the other day and two newscasters were talking to each other. One asked, "Are you familiar with The Onion?" The other said she was not, so the first proceded to explain what The Onion is and why it's so funny. And then at the end of the segment, the other lady said, "Yeah, um, I know what The Onion is, I just wasn't paying attention when you asked me." It was such a random, weird admission that my husband and I cracked up.
Posted by: Sarah at
02:49 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 114 words, total size 1 kb.
July 20, 2006
OH YEAH
Whew, Varifrank gives us both barrels in his discussion of
proportional response!
And Varifrank also pimpslaps whiny people who want everything their way. He and others almost got on an airplane that quite certainly would've crashed, and all the passengers did was complain. I can't help but draw the parallel between these airline passengers and the sniveling jerks who are being rushed out of Lebanon. As one news commenter said this morning, there's been a travel advisory to the region for 20 years and yet people who chose to go there anyway won't stop complaining that the government took a few hours longer than Sweden to ferry them out for free. I think all passengers on that stupid cruise ship should be forced to sit through a reading of Whittle's Responsibility. And they should have to pay that 150 bucks too. Is there some way we can transport all those unused trailers from Katrina to Larnaca?
Posted by: Sarah at
07:39 AM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 160 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: Will at July 20, 2006 08:17 AM (eIQfa)
2
After a flight was cancelled, passengers were standing in a long line to get rebooked on another flight. A man pushed his way to the head of the line and said to the agent, "I HAVE to get on this flight."
"Sir," she replied. "You'll have to wait with all the other passengers."
"DO YOU KNOW WHO I AM?" he yelled.
Without missing a beat, she picked up the microphone. "Attention all passengers. We have a man at the counter who DOES NOT KNOW WHO HE IS. If anyone can help identify him, please come up to the counter."
"**** YOU!" he yelled over his shoulder as he stomped off.
"Sir," she said. "You'll have to wait in line for that, too."
Posted by: david foster at July 20, 2006 02:28 PM (crHHA)
3
Thanks David, that's an oldie but a goodie.
Hey, I read that "unused trailer" link. Very interesting. I thought it was going to be more bashing of the hurricaine/flood victims - something about them being too lazy or criminals or whatever. (sound familiar?)
I was surprised to read it was actually about the incompetence of the (Bush) government and its appointees in saving an American city from drowning. This, too, sounds familiar. Unfortunately.
Posted by: Will at July 20, 2006 02:33 PM (eIQfa)
4
Will -- I find it very interesting that you see no problem commenting on my blog post, yet you don't even bother to read it until six hours later...
Posted by: Sarah at July 21, 2006 02:27 AM (YL5y0)
5
I'm like magic that way.
Posted by: Will at July 23, 2006 09:21 AM (eIQfa)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
July 19, 2006
WHAT AN INFLUENCE!
Hud found a funny website:
A complete list of things caused by global warming
Posted by: Sarah at
09:34 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 20 words, total size 1 kb.
1
The lack of humility before nature being displayed by the right-wing staggers me.
Posted by: Will at July 19, 2006 10:02 AM (eIQfa)
2
What? I don't even understand what you're saying. The fact that I am completely humbled by nature is one of the reasons I don't put much faith in the global warming hype: "nature", as you say, has been around far longer than humans and will continue to be around until long after we can no longer live on this planet. If the planet is warming, *she* will survive; it's we who will not. I've written on this before:
Intoxicating Vanity. I have the utmost humility when it comes to our planet.
Posted by: Sarah at July 19, 2006 10:25 AM (YL5y0)
3
Humans are no longer a part of nature. By right-wing/religious standards, we were given (by God or by or our own evolved"consciousness") "dominion" over the earth. It is now in our responsibility to save it or to continue destroying it. The rock we call 'earth' will certainly survive whatever befalls it because of us. But that's not to say the world we'll leave won't be uninhabitable. Look at all the species that have gone extinct in the last two thousand years and think about it.
It the time of Jesus there were 200 million humans on the entire globe, none of them industrialized. Now we have 9 billion industrialized humans creating CO2 emissions daily. The left-wing just wants to make things cleaner and more efficient so that our children have more than a barren rock to inhabit.
Why, exactly, is this counter to right-wing ideals?
Posted by: Will at July 19, 2006 04:44 PM (eIQfa)
4
Will,
You are a crackpot. You have the mistaken belief, almost a religious one, that the global climate that has existed for the past 100 years is normal.
The pure fact of the matter is that there is NO normal climate for the earth. It has varied on its own account for hundreds of millions of years, and has done so without any input from any biological lifeform. It will continue to vary on its own with no input from any biological life form regardless if humans all die off tomorrow.
Global climate change is happening all the time, it will always happen, and nothing we can do can stop it from happening. The only thing we can do is adapt to the conditions that we have been given. This is what humans have done for their entire existence, and how we came about in the first place.
Your use of right-wing religious standards as an argument is a strawman that has no bearing on anything that Sarah has ever said, lose the tactic, it only makes you look ignorant.
Posted by: John at July 25, 2006 10:52 AM (XHW/A)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
TEDDY
Teddy #2
I'm on a roll: I'm already up to the shirtline of Teddy #3!
Posted by: Sarah at
02:33 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 17 words, total size 1 kb.
1
That is such a great idea...I might have to start doing that when I get settled in the states.
Posted by: Erin at July 19, 2006 08:30 PM (nR8pA)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
July 17, 2006
PUPDATE
Let's have some pupblogging to get our minds off the news, shall we? Charlie has graduated to sleeping outside of his crate most nights. He dives under the bed while we're brushing our teeth and stays there until I get out of bed in the morning and coax him out into the world. There's nothing cuter than seeing him emerge yawning and stretching...except for when he doesn't quite make it all under the bed in the first place. Every once in a while, this is what we find peeking out from under the bed:
Posted by: Sarah at
05:44 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 96 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: Lou at July 17, 2006 08:36 AM (0+7qK)
Posted by: Will at July 17, 2006 02:58 PM (eIQfa)
3
Lucy loves to get under our bed. She usually just sits under there and chews her toys...I don't understand her fascination but she can whittle half the day away under there! I'm going to laugh when she gets too big to squeeze under the bed or under our couch...I don't think she has a great "sense of self" yet so I doubt she will see her limitations!
Posted by: Nicole at July 17, 2006 05:03 PM (nTCFk)
4
Awww. Have I said how much I miss that dog? I do.
How many more cute things can one dog do, I wonder?
Posted by: Erin at July 17, 2006 07:32 PM (TOk4z)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
July 15, 2006
GIVE-AWAY KNITTING
I had
give-away knitting on the brain the other day when I saw an episode of
Knitty Gritty on knitting for charity. They made a cute teddy bear to send to kids in Africa. I have so many apple-sized balls of yarn in this house that I thought this might be a good way to whittle some of that stash down. So I grabbed some yarn and went to work; 36 hours later, I've got a bear to send.
He's not perfect, but hopefully some child will like him. I plan to perfect the technique by making a few more. I'm digging in to the two big baskets of yarn from my living room (Girls, you know what I mean!)
If you're interested in doing this super easy project, the pattern can be found here. (Seriously, I started him yesterday afternoon.) And check out the official Mother Bear Project website, especially the photos of the kids receiving their bears. And then get knitting!
Posted by: Sarah at
05:22 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 167 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Is this something a beginner can do? I have a ton of extra yarn too if anyone who knows how to knit needs yarn. I wonder if you can crochet these bears?
P.S. I'm STILL working on baby blankets! Just 3 more to go
Posted by: Angie at July 16, 2006 05:07 AM (ec43W)
2
If I were a kid, I'd love that little doll. Very sweet.
Posted by: Tom Bux at July 19, 2006 03:00 AM (V8zMF)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
LINK
Annika
sums up my thoughts on the Israel situation...and introduces fears I hadn't thought of yet. Great.
Posted by: Sarah at
10:33 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 19 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Go North. Through Turkey. I was there on exchange for a year. The Turks wouldn't give a flying fuck if the Israeli Air Force passed through on its way to strike the shit out of Iran.
But you know what? I mean, I agree with Annika. But here's a better solution: Move Israel to NEVADA. There's plenty of goddamn desert right in the US to give to them. How do you like that? A Jewish nation next door to YOU? Try it.
Posted by: Will at July 15, 2006 11:31 AM (eIQfa)
2
Sarah,
Have you been getting those articles that I've forwarded to you? I'm wondering if they got zapped by your spam filter. Things in this arena are about to get really interesting.
Posted by: R1 at July 16, 2006 07:57 AM (Mn1rm)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
102kb generated in CPU 0.0257, elapsed 0.1104 seconds.
62 queries taking 0.0931 seconds, 286 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.