April 29, 2006
NOPE
I guess I want to comment on this rumor about an
Atlas Shrugged movie. I'm so not going to see it. I love this horrible synopsis of the book:
The Russian-born author's seminal tome, published in 1957, revolves around the economic collapse of the U.S. sometime in the future and espouses her individualistic philosophy of objectivism.
My husband came home ranting about this, saying that Hollywood types might be surprised to find that the "economic collapse of the U.S." isn't because of global warming or Bushitler's junta. This book is about the triumph of capitalism, so it's ironic that they're considering Miss UN for the lead role. Seriously, Angelina Jolie is a fan of this book? She can read?
And I'd love to see the trainwreck that is Oliver Stone's version of The Fountainhead.
Posted by: Sarah at
11:39 AM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
Post contains 136 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Those will be good ones to watch after I they are free on cable, and even then only to watch the 'train wreck', as you say! I'm not sure that it could translate to a movie, even when done by people who understand it. Jolie as Dagny Taggert and Brad Pitt as John Galt? .... NOT!
Posted by: Barb at April 29, 2006 12:25 PM (g9qHI)
2
Oops, I meant to add that this description just points out the uselessness of Hollyweird even attempting these two movies : "Rand's individualistic and character-driven stories ..."
They obviously don't get Rand or objectivism.
Posted by: Barb at April 29, 2006 12:28 PM (g9qHI)
3
I expect they will play up the romantic angles while downplaying or outright ignoring any of the underlying philosophical motivations. Atlas Shrugged will be reduced to a love story.
Posted by: Stephen Macklin at April 29, 2006 05:51 PM (DdRjH)
4
An Atlas Shrugged film could be the greatest fantasy film since Lord of the Rings. I just hope it's not too fantastic - industrialists who are responsible... CEOs who are hardworking and actually know how stuff works... it's a hell of a good yarn though.
Posted by: Will at April 30, 2006 02:32 PM (eIQfa)
5
Why the shot at Jolie's literacy? I thought you were above assuming that everyone who disagrees with your politics is unintelligent. Are you willing to believe that I'm literate? I don't follow her all that closely, but my impression is that she puts her money where her mouth is in a way that a lot of spokes celebrities don't. I would think that you could admire that even if hyou don't completely share her principles.
Plus, she's hot.
Posted by: Pericles at April 30, 2006 08:16 PM (eKf5G)
6
Is she hot? Really? I'm told she is, but I've seen her picture everywhere, and I think I'm missing something. I assume I'm wrong on the matter, and I'll try harder to see her hotness in the future, but I just hope TV and People Magazine aren't lying to me again.
Posted by: Will at May 01, 2006 03:33 PM (eIQfa)
7
I didn't see it at first either.
And I do feel awfully bad for Jennifer Aniston. Still, yeah.
Posted by: Pericles at May 02, 2006 05:56 AM (eKf5G)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
WORN OUT
Note to those who are moving: When they say that your unaccompanied baggage will be picked up any time between 0700 and 2100, they ain't lyin'. Nothing like giving you a 14 hour time window to sit in an empty house. Our guys showed up at 1800.
Second note to those who are moving: The vehicle registration office closes at noon the last business day of the month for inventory. That info would've been nice to know when we set up our car shipping appointment for the last business day of the month. They're also closed on German holidays (Monday's Communism Day, I mean May Day), so if we hadn't raced to get there at 1120, we would've been out of luck for clearing.
Third note to those who are moving: Don't get a billeting room with a kitchen when you're outprocessing. Your TLA is double! Woo-hoo. That will offset the money my husband had to shell out to CIF.
Thank goodness this week is over.
Posted by: Sarah at
11:35 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 170 words, total size 1 kb.
1
CIF--I was SO afraid of having to pay serious dollars to CIF...and I remember cleaning my husband's TA-50 for three days so we didn't have to...ugh!
Posted by: Nicole at April 29, 2006 02:37 PM (CpOyu)
2
When moving, I keep a list of the worst things that could happen in my head. If none of them happen - I feel like I've made the move unscathed (so to speak).
Hope the move in goes smoother than the move out! If it doesn't - consider it blog fodder. *grin* You might as well get something for all the hassle - right?
Hang in there - you're almost here! And we are so very happy to welcome you back to the States.
Posted by: Teresa at April 30, 2006 10:57 PM (FZwDL)
3
just stopped by, to check up on the time clock...soon, WALMART!and Dairy Queen1
Posted by: debey at May 01, 2006 09:05 AM (9MA+u)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
April 26, 2006
DONE
Well, the house is packed. The movers said they had never spent four hours packing a kitchen before. I guess fourteen boxes of dishes and kitchen stuff
is a bit much. Our household goods are mostly dishes, yarn, and books.
I noticed one thing today. You'd think that people who design military housing would make it conducive to moving. Since people are always moving in and out, maybe twisty staircases and right angles in the hallways are not a good idea. I watched the movers bang my stuff a million times while they were trying to maneuver out the front door and down the huge step. These houses should have ramps!
Posted by: Sarah at
11:59 AM
| Comments (9)
| Add Comment
Post contains 113 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Best of luck with the move! I hope everything goes as smoothly as possible. We moved back in October - from Chicago to Boston. Not quite across the ocean - but what a job!
Posted by: Teresa at April 26, 2006 10:24 PM (FZwDL)
2
Just wanted to wish you all the best on your move back home. Thanks for a great blog - yours is a definite "must read"!
And Charlie brings a smile and a tear - he looks just like our Lady, who is no longer with us.
Best of luck to you!
Posted by: Republican Witch at April 27, 2006 12:24 AM (NqozS)
3
Does this mean no more blog? If so, too bad, but I'm not sorry I met you.
Posted by: Will at April 27, 2006 01:13 PM (eIQfa)
4
Will -- I'll keep blogging from the US. Just not frequently until we get settled.
Posted by: Sarah at April 27, 2006 02:58 PM (G0sgY)
5
Safe travels to you both and WELCOME HOME!
Posted by: MaryIndiana at April 28, 2006 10:36 AM (H5doA)
6
Sarah - that's good to hear. I look forward to your observations about America not that you're back in the country. I blog too, occasionally: www.myspace.com/billynixon
Posted by: Will at April 28, 2006 02:49 PM (eIQfa)
7
That should read: "NOW that you're back in the country."
Posted by: Will at April 28, 2006 10:11 PM (eIQfa)
8
I remember the day we took you both to the airport when you left for Vilseck. Now almost three years later it will be so wonderful for you to arrive home safely.
We love you both.
Mama
Posted by: Nancy at April 28, 2006 11:50 PM (OeioM)
9
The problem is socialism. It's not the governments job to provide housing for people. They should do it themselves. Patriotic service members support the end of this and the socialist VA system along with subsidized shopping. The money saved could be used for tax cuts to benefit all Americans. Many of us are getting tired of the whiners in the military, they've even criticized the president. Iraq is a piece of cake and completely successful despite what the liberal media says and our overpayed pampered service people shouldn't be paid extra for being there.
Posted by: american at April 29, 2006 05:18 PM (Q99An)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
April 24, 2006
AFN RULES
Charlie Puppy made it off OK this morning. I think. He was crying up a storm when we had to leave him, but I think he was only crying slightly harder than I was. He still has another 11 hours until he gets to the Midwest.
We're getting ready to take apart the computer. It goes in unaccompanied baggage, along with ma games and trophies. (There's a little AFN humor for ya.) We're staying with Erin for two nights, so I might find the time to hop online at some point before we go.
Now I'm off to organize our school clothes, and maybe a winter coat.
Posted by: Sarah at
10:52 AM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
Post contains 111 words, total size 1 kb.
1
We got a big kick out of this
Posted by: The Girl at April 24, 2006 01:55 PM (HqRyY)
2
I remember our last night in our on-post housing. We were only qualified to have four nights in the Krystall Inn so we "roughed" it for two nights on our own...only the army bed in the guest bedroom with one blanket and pillows...thank goodness it was the beginning of August and we didn't have to worry about staying warm! We caved in through and eventually went across the street to the Boggianos...yeah, we're babies!
Posted by: Nicole at April 24, 2006 07:49 PM (CpOyu)
3
Safe travels Charlie Boy! (oh and happy
belated birthday..)
Posted by: MaryIndiana at April 25, 2006 12:50 AM (YwdKL)
4
Godspeed on your travels Sarah! Oh and for Charlie too! I am sure he arrived in style and complete comtempt from being stuck in the belly of a plane, I'm mean come on according to him he should have been lounging in first class!
We just sent our puppy Bella back two weeks ago and I cried while the dog gave me this pathetic look. Bella arrived fine and I am sure Charlie will too!
HH6
Posted by: Household6 at April 25, 2006 01:14 AM (Gj0PV)
5
I'm guessing my grandpuppy should be in Kansas City by now. I'm sure the airlines took good care of him, even though he probably was wondering what in the world was going on and where are my Mommy and Daddy? Good luck with the movers on Tues. and I will talk to you soon.
Love you both,
Mama
Posted by: Nancy at April 25, 2006 03:01 AM (5taAd)
6
Less than a week! LESS THAN A WEEK!
That last night goes on forever. You can't sleep. I sure couldn't.
The tacos, they are calling your name.
Posted by: Jason at April 25, 2006 10:04 AM (vPhtz)
7
Just a note. Charlie is doing fine and loves the backyard. He can not decide which animal to chase or smell. The only bad thing is that he brought cold and rainy weather with him from Germany. I guess it might help with the transition.
Love,
KC Mom
Posted by: ME at April 25, 2006 06:44 PM (g1qn0)
8
Maryellen,
I've been thinking about Charlie and wondering how he did with the flight and adjusting to new surroundings. He's probably in heaven with his new playmates and the backyard. Have fun!
Nancy
Posted by: Nancy at April 27, 2006 02:09 AM (OeioM)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
April 22, 2006
CUTE
Charlie just loves that big bear that his friend Lewis gave him. He drags it around everywhere with him, apparently even when he has to pee. Just a minute ago I heard my husband downstairs say, "Charlie, you cannot take that thing outside."
Tomorrow starts the big moving process. We take Charlie to the airport at the crack of dawn on Monday. Our phone and internet gets shut off on Tuesday, which is when the movers come, so I will probably be out of the blogging loop for a while.
Only nine more days until Dairy Queen.
Posted by: Sarah at
04:58 PM
| Comments (9)
| Add Comment
Post contains 99 words, total size 1 kb.
1
If you're headed to SC, I can tell you that you will DEFINITELY be ready for DQ! Our temps here in GA are HOT, HOT, HOT and the humidity has given it the "oven-ish" feeling. But of course, heat aside, you will be on US soil...indulging in blizzards and snowcones and the like...good luck with your move!
Posted by: Nicole at April 22, 2006 05:54 PM (CpOyu)
2
sure gonna miss you, while you're gone!..travel safe!
Posted by: debey at April 23, 2006 02:26 AM (MwIjT)
3
ps.............honestly, now.....DAIRY QUEEN??or....WALMART????
Posted by: debey at April 23, 2006 02:27 AM (MwIjT)
4
BE A MAN AND LEAVE THIS POST INTACT.
JESUS CHRIST HAS REMOVED HIS BLESSING FROM AMERICA BECAUSE OF YOU AMERINAZIS. YOU CANÂ’T MURDER PEOPLE TO STEAL THEIR OIL, THEN LIE ABOUT IT! DON'T YOU THINK YOU'RE GOING TO HELL FOR THAT?
http://www.deanberryministries.org/index3.html
Posted by: DEAN BERRY -- REAL AMERICAN at April 23, 2006 05:01 AM (h/YSB)
5
Way to let us know you're a Christian by your love there, Dean (he types sarcastically). Yes, Sarah, to be man enough to leave that post.
One of our dogs loves stuffed animals. He had a lamb when we got him, and would suck on its nose at night. The other dog, though, is really rough on dog toys, and would just shred something like that, so we can't let him have anything stuffed unless we separate them somehow.
Posted by: Pericles at April 23, 2006 08:28 AM (eKf5G)
6
I'm so glad he likes it! We usually have to cut all of the stuffing out of "babies" for Lewis because it's inevitable that it will end up all over the house.
And, yeah...That whole Dean Berry thing came out of left field. What a freak.
Posted by: Erin at April 23, 2006 10:38 AM (6jyey)
7
Whoa, Dean! Lighten up a bit. I'd be ashamed if I were you to speak that way and then sign your comments with deanberryministries. A bit of an oxymoron, I believe. May God bless you and cleanse you of that rage and anger you've got going there.
Posted by: Nancy at April 24, 2006 12:01 AM (6s7Zq)
8
I will miss reading your updates every morning when I come to work. (guess I actually have to do work).
I wish all of you a safe and adventurous trip! You're in my prayers.
Posted by: Vonn at April 24, 2006 09:10 AM (dEgRi)
9
It's too bad "Christians" like Dean Berry make a bad name for the rest of us "Our God is an Awesome God" folks. Thanks Dean...hummm, I wonder what Jesus would think about your attitude. Travel mercies to you and hubby. I know Erin and Kelly will really miss you.
P.S. I really love the dog party. We had one for Gretel and her pups, Holly and Mr. Bill. The pups are 12.5 years now. After we taught Gretel to open presents...she got under the Christmas tree and helped herself to a box of chocolate covered cherries. Remember Erin? Take care.
Love, Erin's Mom
Posted by: Cindy French at April 26, 2006 10:45 PM (023Of)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
April 21, 2006
UP AND RUNNING
Pixy saved the day again, it appears. I guess he changed servers for mu.nu and I didn't know to redirect my site. But now it appears to be working! If we ever have this trouble again, know that my site also appears at its home in Munuviana: http://tryingtogrok.mu.nu
Posted by: Sarah at
04:20 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 54 words, total size 1 kb.
April 19, 2006
HAPPY BIRTHDAY, CHARLIE!
Yesterday was Charlie's first birthday. He invited six of his closest friends over to the house. They had Beef Bacon Cheddar cake and Charlie got lots of toys and treats as gifts. And all his friends went home with party favors as well.
The party went much better than you might expect for inviting multiple dogs into your home. We videotaped the event, and this was the one screen shot where we could get all seven dogs in the picture. So here's Charlie being the center of attention...
And here's Charlie, worn out at the end of the night, playing with his new birthday bear...
Posted by: Sarah at
02:36 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 111 words, total size 1 kb.
1
While my irrational fear of dogs (above knee level) would have sent me through the roof, the party looks like a success.
It almost looks as if Charlie is giving everyone his "Thank you for coming" speech.
Posted by: Vonn at April 19, 2006 09:11 AM (dEgRi)
2
You girls are just tooo funny! I love it! As much as I love Toby, I never thought to have a birthday party for him! And party favors too! Wow! Wish I could have been there!
Your mama
Posted by: Nancy at April 19, 2006 11:28 AM (6s7Zq)
3
It is so cute to see those "tired eyes" in our dogs. When we keep ours up to late she just looks at us like please, please let me go to sleep. Charlie had a big day!.
Posted by: Ruth H at April 19, 2006 11:35 AM (uZYtv)
4
Sarah,
I love how your husband is corralling Lewis while MY husband is just sitting there...
Posted by: Erin at April 20, 2006 04:01 AM (z9os7)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
ON KNITBLOGS
Look at
this bunny's feet! Happy Easter indeed!
And Kelly found the most wonderful project: The Binary Hat
I really enjoyed reading this blog post about teaching other people to knit. I have taught many people, and most of them have continued knitting. I love that. Erin and Kelly were the funniest though. They came to me and said, "We want to learn to knit. Teach us to make socks." Seriously. That was their very first project. No scarves for them. They didn't learn to purl or cast off for ages! Nothing like starting with the hardest project.
I've been thinking a lot lately about branching out. I've knitted English for nine years, and I really want to learn continental. But every time I try, it's so awkward that I just switch back. But all knitting is awkward in the beginning; I just need to push through the pain and learn it.
Then I could knit standing up!
Posted by: Sarah at
01:03 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 162 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Eww! Why would you want to knit standing up?
Erin
Posted by: Erin at April 19, 2006 01:25 AM (EKdUA)
2
The binary hat is the coolest!
Posted by: Vonn at April 19, 2006 09:06 AM (dEgRi)
3
Here's one from a Jersey Knitter.
http://knitalongwithme.blogspot.com
Posted by: Jim - PRS at April 21, 2006 01:57 AM (njBz/)
4
Just wanted to let you know that I FINALLY picked my knitting back up this week. We are making a long car trip across the U.S. and I am so happy to have something to keep my hands busy! I been feeling so guilty every time you talk about your knitting students - I haven't touched my blanket since Gabi was born - but you'll be happy to know, that I'm back on track. Too bad I didn't work on this more while you were still around to teach me some new stuff! Oh well... guess I'll have to resort to learning on-line like Vonn! Miss you! Good luck with your move!
Posted by: Jen D at May 01, 2006 08:41 PM (RABF3)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
April 18, 2006
DANG
Charlie likes to sit on our bed and look out the window. Here's an old pre-haircut photo of him doing it.
Two minutes ago he was sitting on our bed like this and caught sight of our neighbor going out to her car. He barked once and then leapt towards the window, crashing into the glass, nearly impaling himself on the window handle, and falling to the ground.
Sometimes I think he's brilliant, and other days I'm not so sure.
Posted by: Sarah at
05:31 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 82 words, total size 1 kb.
HEH
Reader Jim sent me a link to a hilarious knitting project. I first thought the link was going to be something more like
this. So I had a good laugh when I saw what the
Tree Sweater really was.
Posted by: Sarah at
05:22 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 41 words, total size 1 kb.
HEH -- IT'S FUNNY CUZ IT'S TRUE
Mark Steyn on Iran:
You know what's great fun to do if you're on, say, a flight from Chicago to New York and you're getting a little bored? Why not play being President Ahmadinejad? Stand up and yell in a loud voice, "I've got a bomb!" Next thing you know the air marshal will be telling people, "It's OK, folks. Nothing to worry about. He hasn't got a bomb." And then the second marshal would say, "And even if he did have a bomb it's highly unlikely he'd ever use it." And then you threaten to kill the two Jews in row 12 and the stewardess says, "Relax, everyone. That's just a harmless rhetorical flourish." And then a group of passengers in rows 4 to 7 point out, "Yes, but it's entirely reasonable of him to have a bomb given the threatening behavior of the marshals and the cabin crew."
Posted by: Sarah at
03:43 AM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 164 words, total size 1 kb.
1
When I'm on a plane, I play President Bush. I look for someone assembling a bomb. When I find one, I am going to attack the guy in the seat next to him, on the theory that someday down the road he might try to get a bomb, too.
Posted by: Pericles at April 18, 2006 05:14 PM (eKf5G)
2
Iran is trying to get nukes and WMDs in order to directly attack us now because they hate our freedoms. Is that right?
Can you guess why I'm skeptical. (Fool me once, anyone?)
Posted by: Will at April 19, 2006 12:01 AM (eIQfa)
3
Could you guys take it easy on the poor little thing? Since you mugged her with reality she has retreated to nothing but puppies and knitting.
Posted by: question at April 21, 2006 11:54 AM (n17hK)
4
Here is an "honest" question, one that I don't know the answer to and would like to hear the thoughts of others on. Suppose that Saddam HAD had an active nuclear program, or a WMD program of some time. Could we really fault him for this, giving the very active program in Iran? He fought a long war with them, with our active support and enciuragement. Now they are getting nukes? Wouldn't this do as much to legitimize Iraq's pursuit of a WMD program as it does Israel's possession of one?
Posted by: Pericles at April 22, 2006 01:25 PM (eKf5G)
5
Good question Pericles. Personally, I am very against Iran actually acquring a usable stockpile of nukes and (more importantly) the means to shoot those nukes across a wide distance. (Interestingly, nobody ever thinks about the fact that a nuclear country without satellites and ICBMs is actually quite harmless.)
I understand why the Iranian government has become more fundamentalist and warlike in the last few years - just look at the two countries on either side of it and think about it - but I do happen to think the Ahmadinejad might, in fact, be crazy, and I don't want him nuking Israel, for sure. I'm not a big fan religious fanatics anywhere.
However, Iran doesn't and won't have the ability to use nukes against its neighbours, much less us, for decades. Right now, the appropriate path is diplomacy, not war. And I think in light of Iraq, we can see that this administration would rather go to war than not, and that's pretty damn scary, especially when it might involve a pre-emptive NUCLEAR strike against a country that hasn't attacked anyone, that has made guarantees that it only wants a nuclear power program, and is a signed member of the nuclear non-proliferation pact.
Bush is no longer an alcoholic, and I congratulate him for that, but I can only imagine that everytime he's dying for a drink, he gets down and prays for the strength to stay clean, because he NEEDS to stay clean, because he has some great task at hand. And a man like that will do anything to create that great task. It's like he's saying to the world - "I'm strong because I'm going to face armageddon with my head clear and my eyes open. Everyone be strong like me."
But I've never been a screwed up alcoholic, born-again-christian like Bush, and I really don't care if he drinks or not because he's going to continue to be spoiled little brat no matter what, so I wish he would just chill OUT already. Someone's got to tell him that he doesn't have to bring on armageddon.
Anyway, more to the point of the question, I think that Israel should have nukes and Iran and the rest shouldn't because anyone who's read a history book of the 20th century can see that Israel is in constant danger of being attacked by every single one of its incredibly strong-willed and fundamentalist neighbours, and because since 1980, Iran has become an increasingly unstable, fundamentalist state. However, that is not an advocation of war with Iran. It's just a complex issue that right-wingers will never be able to understand because they're brains have been fried by Fox News.
Posted by: Will at April 22, 2006 03:19 PM (eIQfa)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
April 17, 2006
COMMENTS
My mom was having a hard time getting into my website over the weekend for some reason, so she googled my site to try to access it that way. If you've been following my site for a few years, you may remember the day I got Lefty-lanched, when hundreds of people came to my website to tell me how dumb I am. My mom ended up back in the middle of that mess via google, and what she found really surprised me when she told me today.
Someone didn't like a blog post I wrote. They thought it was dumb and mathematically unsound. So he wrote a post about what an idiot I am. I personally think that's in very poor taste, but whatever, it was his choice for his hate-filled website. But his comments section went too far. Apparently some commenter published my name, address, and phone number, and the contact info for my parents as well. Thankfully, other commenters thought that was a low blow and the owner of the site took the info down. But, man: I just realized that two years ago I was personally attacked for something I said online. People who disagreed with me seriously meant to hurt me. And I didn't even know it until today.
It's funny because at that time, I got some really hateful comments. This site had nasty comments too -- including the ones that said that my husband left his wedding ring home from Iraq so he could get laid -- but this other blog owner also got a handful of comments defending me. It was nice to read this comment:
I saw all of this via cruel.com, and really don't get why everyone piled on. It didn't seem to me that she was doing a stat analysis so much as making a (not very carefully worded) point about reporting bias highlighting certain aspects of a poll already suffering from several questions that presented insufficient response choices to options that begged other questions.
I was not under the impression that she literally thought that only 615 people in the entire United States responded in a certain way to question quoted above. In fact, it was obvious to me that she wasn't. To think that's what she meant, you'd have to assume an almost non-functional level of stupidity. I guess the assumption of simple-mindedness was in place because of the general trend for lefties to view righties as intellectually inferior, for the simple thought crime of not being lefties.
Coming from cruel.com, I'm used to good quality links of people making asses of themselves. I'm still waiting for the punchline on this one, and I can't tell if the intended stupidity was supposed to be the original blog entry on tryingtogrok or all of this odd, over-the-top follow up.
Now that's some common ground I can enjoy! (emphasis mine)
I've been thinking a lot about comments these days. Lots of the big right-leaning sites don't even have comments sections, and I can completely understand why. Charles Johnson has to answer for everything that's written on his blog, when he himself only posts links and pithy snippets. But he's a "racist" and a "fascist" because of his comments section. I've often wondered how Markos Zuniga lets people post the crazy things they say under the umbrella of his site. No one takes note of the diarist; they just attribute the whole thing to Zuniga.
So what's our relationship to our comments? The other day I somehow managed to get a comment from a White Power site. I don't know how they found me or what they thought they read in my words, but there they were. Does it make me a white supremacist because someone thought he had identified me as one? Am I a religious fundamentalist just because Will Sommerset called me one?
A lot of times I've just considered shutting my comments section down. But I guess I've grown accustomed to the noise.
Posted by: Sarah at
10:53 AM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
Post contains 667 words, total size 4 kb.
1
The haters think but calling people names it dulls their pain. Their pain of self hate and drepression brought on by their believe in a negative ideology.
I had a slight taste of that myself this week.
http://jameshudnall.com/blog.php?/weblog/secular_religious_zealots_in_action/
Posted by: James Hudnall at April 17, 2006 07:04 PM (F+Wqc)
2
What vakue would the blog have to you without a comments section? How would you know anyone was listening?
Needless to say, though, I take issue with the person you quote. As if "righties" treat "lefties" as THEIR intellectual equals or superiors. Yeah, I'm always warmed by the respect with which Ann Coulter treats people who disagree with her.
Posted by: Pericles at April 17, 2006 07:07 PM (eKf5G)
3
Argh. Typos. I should have proofread that.
"The haters think by calling people names it'll dull their pain. Their pain of self hate and drepression brought on by their belief in a negative ideology."
Leftism is largely based on angry emotions and that comes largely from depression. The left wing elites feed that negative reinforcement. It has become a cult of self hate kind of like the Palestianian jihadists are trapped in a death cult.
Posted by: James Hudnall at April 17, 2006 07:12 PM (F+Wqc)
4
"What vakue would the blog have to you without a comments section? How would you know anyone was listening?"
There's always e-mail. Works for me. Never had a comments section since I started in 2002.
Posted by: Amritas at April 17, 2006 08:06 PM (mb59o)
5
James---Thanks for proving my point about the level of intellectual respect that the left gets from the right.
Posted by: Pericles at April 17, 2006 08:27 PM (eKf5G)
6
I don't believe I've ever gone onto someone else's site and made a confrontational comment. If I think the person is full of baloney, I'll just move on and likely not ever return.
Life is too short to be going onto people's sites to pick a fight.
Posted by: Jim - PRS at April 17, 2006 10:13 PM (njBz/)
7
I only wish I had the courage to write about some of the stuff you've written about. I know that my skin isn't thick enough to handle the kinds of comments you receive...I would have shut down the section long ago. Thanks for being gutsy and putting it out there!
Posted by: Nicole at April 18, 2006 08:02 PM (Sa9Kb)
8
Wait. You're not?
(just kidding... I think)
Posted by: Will Somerset at April 19, 2006 12:04 AM (eIQfa)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
April 16, 2006
BAH HUMBUG FOR EASTER
Erin asked me if I was going to write a post about Easter today. My day started out great, with the last Sunday Knitting Club at my house. But it was all downhill from there. My husband needs a military vehicle early tomorrow morning, and we spent over two hours driving all over Bavaria trying to find the soldier who has the TMP keys in his pocket. At that point we were both already quite grumpy, so after dinner we sat down to watch a movie and relax. Of course it didn't help our mood when the disk started skipping and we had to restart the DVD player five times. And then Charlie nipped my husband's hand while they were playing and got him pretty hard on the finger, and I cut my hand on the medicine cabinet and started bleeding myself. We gave up and came upstairs to go to bed and forget about today.
But Happy Easter anyway.
Posted by: Sarah at
03:06 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 168 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Sad. Don't you hate those kind of days?
Happy Easter.
Posted by: Erin at April 16, 2006 03:44 PM (2D/WI)
2
Be thankful the day if over and look forward to a great week.........and only 15 more days in Germany!
Posted by: Vonn at April 16, 2006 07:13 PM (Wy1BF)
3
That sucks......Thank god it's over, now watch Racheal Ray and have a better day!
Posted by: Kelly at April 17, 2006 01:34 AM (a54xk)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
GOOD JOB, GRASSHOPPER
The Girl finished her
first major knitting project. It looks so nice. And she made up the cable on the sleeves herself! Her brother's baby will be so cute in it.
Posted by: Sarah at
03:15 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 37 words, total size 1 kb.
April 15, 2006
BAD MOVE
If it's at all possible, never arrange to move the week when your husband has finals for his MBA classes and when he's acting commander because the real commander is on leave. That's a scenario to avoid.
Posted by: Sarah at
07:24 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 41 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Sarah,
I think I can trump you on this one. Once in a land far, far away - the past, when my husband was finishing up his MS thesis he was working for the Tex Parks and Wildlife, not named that at the time.
I was very, very preggie, scheduled for June to have a baby. Well, baby didn't arrive till July 17, tne thesis was completed and signed off on and the new job was in Virginia. Long story short, we left Texas when the baby was 17 days old, I nursed him all across the country, the three year old was car sick most of the way and I was exhausted!
But we had fun. And it is fun to look back on.
Posted by: Ruth H at April 15, 2006 03:17 PM (w20rj)
2
Yeah moving...my least favorite topic in the military
When it rains, it pours! (of course)
Posted by: Nicole at April 15, 2006 04:24 PM (Sa9Kb)
3
I remember when you were 18 mos. old, and I was six months pregnant with Michael and we were moving from Tulsa to Pittsburgh. Dad had to go ahead and move to Pittsburgh, and "you" and I were left behind to sell the house, arrange the move with the movers (they packed my car keys and also repacked a truck at midnight because they didn't listen to me when I told them all of our things would not fit on the truck they had brought). Such fun! Your dad handled the next move and has helped with all the rest since. I think he realized when he came back for the closing on the house that I was not a happy camper! Somehow you'll manage! Hang in there!
Love,
Your Mama
Posted by: Nancy at April 15, 2006 10:51 PM (6s7Zq)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
April 13, 2006
PROJECTS
I'm working on a basic sweater right now. I've made this pattern as a pullover, but now I think I'm going to try to convert it into a cardigan. Anyway, here's the beginning of one of the sleeves.
And The Girl wants to learn to do entrelac. I had never done it before, but I remembered seeing this pattern on Knitty. So I made myself a little swatch. Entrelac is actually pretty fun; it's like a knitting puzzle. I couldn't imagine it by just reading, so I grabbed some junk yarn and saw it come together before my own eyes.
Posted by: Sarah at
06:43 AM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 102 words, total size 1 kb.
1
18 days, 21hours...and you haven't had to pack your knitting?
Posted by: debey at April 13, 2006 09:18 AM (o52PP)
2
That is one pattern that I have printed out to knit this year. Do you comment on knitty?
Posted by: dkswife at April 13, 2006 09:26 AM (/l6sd)
3
Debey -- We decided to "tough it out" in the US instead of here, so we're not having our household goods picked up until a week before we leave. But don't worry, there will be plenty of knitting in my suitcase
DKS -- I have never commented on Knitty, but I check in with them all the time. I'm too big of a wuss to make my own patterns; adapting a pullover to a cardigan is a Big Deal for an anal person like me who follows patterns to the letter.
Posted by: Sarah at April 13, 2006 10:01 AM (ZP5Sl)
4
I love that gray--and to think that I pay $50-$60 for a great chunky knit sweater and you can make your own. Nice
Posted by: Nicole at April 13, 2006 11:48 AM (Sa9Kb)
5
Entrelac is pretty cool. However, I think I need to master cable-knit first. I'll get there one day.
Posted by: Vonn at April 13, 2006 12:46 PM (dEgRi)
6
ooh I dig the entrelac, one of those things I love how it looks but just haven't gotten 'round to trying it yet!
Posted by: zib at April 13, 2006 08:40 PM (VRrH1)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
April 12, 2006
LINK
There IS a problem with global warming... it stopped in 1998
Posted by: Sarah at
03:46 AM
| Comments (11)
| Add Comment
Post contains 13 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I was looking for this excellent webpage as a general rebuttal, but the current artical is a direct rebuttal. The blog gives in-depth debunking info.
http://illconsidered.blogspot.com/
Also, I'm anxious for disclosure of recent vorticity trends (general measure of atmospheric swirling). Anyone anxious about hurricane season? Seems we're having a tornado every third day here in the midwest. I don't remember hearing the sirens so much as a kid.
In related news, ultra-low emissions and ultra-high MPG is becoming economically attractive, the only way it will take off. Toyota will likely gain even more market share. I've been getting an honest-to-god 49 mpg (I'll send you my excel spreadsheet if you want to see) over the first 5000 miles in my 2006 Prius. Note, the figure in the article is likely quoted in miles per imperial gallon, so the translation for U.S. readers is 94 MPG.
http://www.autoexpress.co.uk/news/66260/prius_hits_113mpg.html
Posted by: Curtis at April 12, 2006 07:07 AM (bEk/L)
2
Full text of last link from AutoExpress which as I was typing became stale enough to require registration.
"Toyota is charging ahead in the race for domination of the hybrid car market, according to Auto Express spies.
The firm's next Prius will be so efficient it will be the first production car capable of returning more than 110mpg. The newcomer is being developed to try to improve European sales. While the car has been a success in the US, it has met a mixed reaction on this side of the Atlantic, due to the popularity of diesel models.
But now we've been told that engineers working on the new Prius have a fuel economy target of 40km/litre - a mind-boggling 113mpg.
"The whole electrical system has been redesigned to improve economy" said one Toyota engineer. "We are working on a prototype that runs solely on the electric motor in slow traffic, but switches to engine and motor drive when higher speeds are needed." The secret lies with the batteries. The current Prius uses nickel-hydride items, which currently offer the best balance between cost and performance.
But engineers are working on new lithiumion cells, which are lighter, smaller, generate more power and last longer. Subaru and Mitsubishi both plan to sell electric cars by 2010, but Toyota hopes to get its new model on the road as early as 2008.
And improved economy isn't the firm's only goal, as engineers are working on reducing the current car's 10.9-second 0-62mph time by more than a second.
Peter Lyon "
Posted by: Curtis at April 12, 2006 07:11 AM (bEk/L)
3
Some long-term data:
http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/2005/
Posted by: Pericles at April 12, 2006 03:42 PM (eKf5G)
4
It's definitely been getting warmer in the Pacific Northwest area. I remember in the 80s, when I was growing up, it always snowed for at least a week each winter in Seattle and Vancouver. But lately, well, it hasn't really snowed here in about ten years. Time magazine recently published an article that said all Arctic ice will be gone in 60 years. I feel bad for the polar bears. I know that Arctic ice and polar bears haven't been around forever, but I somehow feel bad all the same, having to see them go in my lifetime.
Posted by: Will at April 12, 2006 04:28 PM (eIQfa)
5
Actually Pericles, that link has important information about short-term data as well. It states that 2005 was the hottest year in recent history, and didn't receive a temp boost from El Nino like 1998 did.
Straight from that page:
"Record warmth in 2005 is notable, because global temperature has not received any boost from a tropical El Niño this year. The prior record year, 1998, on the contrary, was lifted 0.2°C above the trend line by the strongest El Niño of the past century."
Global warming seems pretty straightforward to me:
CO2 is a greenhouse gas
Buring fossil fuels
adds CO2 to the atmosphere
Higher concentrations of greenhouse gases causes the temperature to rise
The only possible argument there is, is that CO2 from human activity is not enough to cause any problems (of course we wouldn't know that for certain until it was too late). An analogy I heard once, is it's like poking a sleeping bear with a stick - sure you might not poke him hard enough to wake him up, but are the risks really worth it?
Posted by: Polar at April 12, 2006 06:55 PM (um7YX)
6
An analogy I heard once, is it's like poking a sleeping bear with a stick - sure you might not poke him hard enough to wake him up, but are the risks really worth it?
That is an
amazingly dumb analogy. Congratulations.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at April 13, 2006 04:16 AM (FRalS)
7
Another valuable and civil contribution from Pixy...
Posted by: Pericles at April 13, 2006 05:35 AM (eKf5G)
8
I agree with Pixy. Analogies involving bears are, by their nature, amazingly dumb. No reason for that, by the way. It could be because bears are funny looking, or something. I don't know. But congratulations are in order. To all of us.
Posted by: Will at April 13, 2006 06:42 AM (eIQfa)
9
That made me laugh, Pixy. You were the one who alerted me to the fact that the most important greenhouse gas is water vapor.
Thanks for linking that article Sarah, I thought it was very enlightening.
Posted by: annika at April 14, 2006 12:15 PM (fxTDF)
10
Saying water vapour is the most important greenhouse gas is like saying nitrogen is the most important element in the air we breath. Nitrogen is something like 78% of the air, Oxygen is only 20%, CO2 is less than a percent. You also breath in helium, carbon monoxide, ozone and sulfur dioxide.
Now, you're saying that the more of something there is, the "more important" it is. Obviously, oxygen is the most important element of air, not because of its percentage but because of a more complex reason - it's the element that attaches to red blood cells and travels to the rest of the cells in our bodies, keeping us alive. Nitrogen does nothing either way.
So basically, you just don't understand life.
Posted by: Will at April 14, 2006 04:10 PM (eIQfa)
11
Ok, I'll admit - the bears analogy was superficially silly. I half-expected a comment along the lines of Pixy's as I was writing it (while still hoping any replies would address the
content of the post). A "perfect analogy" is a contradiction in terms, but what I was trying to parallel was the idea of the climate as a big and complex thing that we can't control, but only provoke. We can see CO2 levels rising, and we know CO2 will increase temperatures, so why are people so adamant about ignoring it?
And yes, annika, you are correct, water vapor is the "most important" greenhouse gas. (If by important you mean the most prevalent greenhouse gas in our atmosphere.) Without water vapor (and other greenhouse gases) life as we know it probably would not exist on Earh - it would be inhospitably cold (-4°F). Climatolgists are well aware of water vapor, but the reason it's not talked about much is because we can't directly control how much water vapor is in the atmosphere. CO2 (the second most prevalent greenhouse gas) on the other hand, we can.
Posted by: Polar at April 15, 2006 11:00 AM (um7YX)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
April 11, 2006
UGH
Wanna read some absolutely depressing stuff about immigration?
No easy answers on immigration conundrum
Posted by: Sarah at
11:07 AM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 16 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I love your blog. Good reading!
Posted by: dkswife at April 11, 2006 01:51 PM (/l6sd)
2
I think Bush is in the pocket of certain special interests that prefer to pay a lot less than the minimum wage by using illegal labor. I don't know how else to explain his attitude about it. I mean, if it meant feeding yourself and you got paid decently, I know plenty of young Americans that would work in 'primary resource' jobs.
Posted by: Will at April 11, 2006 07:29 PM (eIQfa)
3
Hi, I found your site by cruising the oh so short list on the anit-idiotariaknits webring. I just became a member of it.
Take care and stay safe!
God Bless!
Posted by: dkswife at April 12, 2006 10:34 AM (/l6sd)
4
Actually the easy answer is to seal the damn border. Preferably with a moat of fire. But that's just me.
Posted by: Mare at April 13, 2006 11:43 AM (85zTD)
5
That will show those cold and hungry masses yearning to breath.
Posted by: Will at April 13, 2006 07:24 PM (eIQfa)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
NOT TOO SHABBY
I was thinking more about that AFN commercial and I found a
military compensation calculator that lets you see the equivalent civilian income that relates to the same standard of living you live at in the military. It doesn't work well for overseas because they don't add anything for housing, but try it with the CONUS average and see where you're at. Heck, this is the main reason we're not getting out of the Army anytime soon.
Posted by: Sarah at
07:55 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 83 words, total size 1 kb.
1
This is why we are hanging around until 20 years. It's a really nice security blanket and he will still be young enough to start a whole new career if he chooses to.
Posted by: Vonn at April 11, 2006 10:06 AM (dEgRi)
2
Very cool. I'm damn near rich!
Posted by: Sgt Hook at April 11, 2006 11:43 PM (Mxd69)
3
Dang. Thanks for linking to that. We make more than I thought we did!
Posted by: Erin at April 12, 2006 04:06 AM (7ksg4)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
TRAVEL PHOTOS
As we get ready to move back to the US, I have started thinking about our European experience. Lots of people who live here put up photos of the places they've traveled. I started thinking about our collection of travel photos. My husband and I don't travel much, and when we do, we're always alone. We've gotten pretty good at taking our own photo. In fact, when we were in Prague, someone offered to take our photo and we turned him down! We've got quite a running gag going of us in front of foreign stuff. And so I present to you our travel photos.
First of all, us in front of our house, right when we moved here
Then Salzburg
Frankfurt
Heidelberg
Garmisch for R&R
our cruise
Mulhouse for the Tour de France
and finally Prague
I think it's hilarious that all of our photos end up looking about the same. I love that. I can't wait to add similar photos of us in front of places like Mt. Rushmore, the Redwood forest, and Busch Stadium.
Posted by: Sarah at
03:28 AM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
Post contains 181 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Awww.
You are so stinkin' pretty (and photogenic)!
Posted by: Erin at April 11, 2006 05:02 AM (7oVGv)
2
Those are great! Thanks for sharing.
Posted by: Kathleen A at April 11, 2006 06:55 AM (7qm8p)
3
Those are great! You two are adorable
I can't wait to see the American versions.
Posted by: lizzie at April 11, 2006 08:10 AM (wxF45)
4
Mt. Rushmore???REALLY!!It's a 3rd of July fireworks display, to the tune of $1,000,000...if I ever go there, again, it will be for 3july...but going in the winter is cool, and usually the people are fewer...those ''great faces'' are about 7 hours, from me!spearfish canyon is awesome, when fall hits, and the leaves are changing colors, too...and custer state park, in the spring, with the wildlife and newborn babies..buffalo, deer elk.....''great faces, great places''...south dakota!i'm also 25 minutes away from the world's largest bird feeder..oops, i mean the world's only corn palace, in mitchell..so, don't be running around this state w/o a guide!!there's also some good fishing & those damned pheasents!...debey
ps..glad to see erin's ''talking''!
Posted by: debey at April 11, 2006 08:33 AM (vAEec)
5
Such cute photos! They have a South Park feel to them....'Explanation=same pose, but the backgroud keeps changing.' I love it!
It would be great if we could photoshop one and add Cartman.
Posted by: Vonn at April 11, 2006 10:10 AM (dEgRi)
6
Have you guys ever thought about asking somebody else to take your picture for you?
Posted by: Will at April 11, 2006 07:16 PM (eIQfa)
7
My boyfriend and I do this all the time, too! I mean we have loads of photos of us taken by someone else, but I have such a fondness for these photos, because they have such a fun feeling to them, instead of real posing. I plan on collecting all of ours and putting them together in an frame soon.
Posted by: CaliValleyGirl at April 14, 2006 08:34 AM (apdbD)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
117kb generated in CPU 0.029, elapsed 0.1179 seconds.
65 queries taking 0.1005 seconds, 331 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.