August 25, 2004
LIFE IMITATES OTT
Hilarious new Scrappleface article.
What's that you say? It's real? It's a
real article?
Oh. I coulda sworn...
Posted by: Sarah at
03:15 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 24 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Kerry is doing a rope-a-dope. With his allies in the media, it just might work. i'm sure Clinton has advised him on this. Just wait out the controversy, until the people get tired of hearing about it.
It irks me that he said countless times "bring... it... on" and then when it was brought on, he couldn't take the heat. That tells me all i need to know about whether he's "fit for command" or not.
Posted by: annika at August 25, 2004 01:35 PM (zAOEU)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
August 24, 2004
STATS
I had my first statistics class tonight.
I was practically bouncing out of my seat, I was so excited.
Posted by: Sarah at
04:20 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 21 words, total size 1 kb.
1
My e-mail is pretty messed up right now, I can recieve but sending has been an utter bear.
Question: Did you get those documents about Dover AFB?
Kalroy
Posted by: Kalroy at August 24, 2004 10:41 PM (q1aeu)
2
Heh.
Stats was always one of my favourites too.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at August 26, 2004 12:49 PM (+S1Ft)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
WOW
I for one have been brainwashed and hoodwinked.
A lot of this is
news to me.
It's a shame that party stereotypes continue to trump reality.
(via Avery)
Posted by: Sarah at
12:41 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 30 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Sarah - I read this link through Instapundit http://www.boston.com/globe/nation/packages/kerry/061603.shtml
Maybe someone should ask the Boston Globe to CORRECT the record.
This by far goes farther than simply 'seared, seared in me' - it even has FAKE details!
Posted by: Kathleen A at August 24, 2004 06:14 PM (vnAYT)
2
I learned a lot from it. Oh, and thank you. Another part, though, was connecting dots I already knew about, and some things that should have been obvious, I mean I knew that the Republicans opposed slavery and that the Democrats supported it, but for some reason it never occurred to me that of course the first black government officials and politicians would have been Republicans.
Great link, and thank you.
Kalroy
Posted by: Kalroy at August 24, 2004 10:40 PM (q1aeu)
3
I knew quite a lot of these things. It's because the Democrats have always (with the willing help of the news media) been able to use the media very artfully. They are masters at it.
On the Republican side - Reagan is about the only one who has ever understood how the media works and how to do end runs around them. That's really very frustrating from my point of view. I figured someone must have learned something from Reagan, but once he was gone... it was business as usual for them. *sigh*
Posted by: Teresa at August 25, 2004 11:35 AM (nAfYo)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
SELFLESS SERVICE
A
battalion commander puts his finger on the nagging
usch I've felt for Kerry:
I think the purple heart issue as it relates to Sen Kerrey [sic] speaks volumns about him as a leader. He was not a private, but a Lieutenant, a small unit leader. He was taught that as a leader his two critical tasks were; accomplish the mission, and welfare of his soldiers. No leader I know would ever dream of leaving their troops behind especially not on a technicality. 3 medals equals ticket home. A leader should represent Army values of duty, honor, and most importantly selfless service. His actions seem more selfish than selfless.
My husband won't even take R&R without the rest of his soldiers getting it; I can't help but feel contempt for someone who would go home and leave his brothers to fend for themselves.
MORE TO GROK:
More two cents on Kerry's leadership.
Posted by: Sarah at
06:44 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 155 words, total size 1 kb.
1
You know, even before now I knew I was voting for Bush given I think he is the correct leader for the times.
Given all that we know now about John Kerry, I don't think I'd vote for him regardless of the times, or who he was running against. It's almost as if I've become an Anybody-But-Kerry person, except I'm voting for Bush, and have been for a long time.
Kerry just seems dispicable.
Posted by: John at August 24, 2004 08:34 AM (crTpS)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
SUPPORT
One Marine groks the same way I do:
Now we are on the verge of victory or defeat in Iraq. Success depends not only on battlefield superiority, but also on the trust and confidence of the American people. I've read some articles recently that call for cutting back our military presence in Iraq and moving our troops to the peripheries of most cities. Such advice is well-intentioned but wrong - it would soon lead to a total withdrawal. Our goal needs to be a safe Iraq, free of militias and terrorists; if we simply pull back and run, then the region will pose an even greater threat than it did before the invasion. I also fear if we do not win this battle here and now, my 7-year-old son might find himself here in 10 or 11 years, fighting the same enemies and their sons.
When critics of the war say their advocacy is on behalf of those of us risking our lives here, it's a type of false patriotism. I believe that when Americans say they "support our troops," it should include supporting our mission, not just sending us care packages. They don't have to believe in the cause as I do; but they should not denigrate it. That only aids the enemy in defeating us strategically.
Posted by: Sarah at
04:53 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 220 words, total size 1 kb.
August 23, 2004
PHOTOS
Erik of No Passaran discusses a French photo exhibit that will feature photos from Abu Ghraib but not from the mass graves found in Iraq as part of the "most important photos of the year":
Now I would like you to ask you to take another look at the photo of the father bestowing a final kiss on the dried skull of his son. (It should not escape notice that the place this skeleton was dug up at was the burial grounds ofÂ… Abu Ghraib.)
Which pictures do you think Ghirayer Ali would deem "the most important photos of the year", Monsieur Leroy? Those showing some of hundreds of thousands of murdered Iraqi civilians dug up from the Iraqi sands, including his son at Abu Ghraib, or the snapshots documenting US troops humiliating prisoners (a good portion of which were those who murdered their countrymen in the first place)?
Before I'm accused of catering to base emotionalism, I will take back the question, and ask a more general one: which of the two groups of pictures do you think your average Iraqi would deem "the most important photos of the year", Monsieur Leroy?
I have a lump in my throat from looking at that photo...
Posted by: Sarah at
09:56 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 207 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Sarah - that is a stunning photograph. Sad that people are forgetting reality. Luckily MOST Iraqis know better.
Posted by: Kathleen A at August 23, 2004 11:05 AM (vnAYT)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
BUSY
Every two months, there are two days where we work 11-hour shifts.
It's today and tomorrow, so there won't be much blogging.
Posted by: Sarah at
09:33 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 24 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Speaking of busy, I'm leaving for vacation in the morning, I'll be back in a week.
Have fun til then.
Posted by: John at August 24, 2004 05:45 AM (crTpS)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
August 22, 2004
WON'T BACK DOWN
In the post I wrote
the day my husband deployed, I mentioned the Johnny Cash version of "I Won't Back Down" that's in a commercial we love. It seems we're not the only ones who like that song; you can hear it during
this slideshow on the First Infantry Division webpage.
Posted by: Sarah at
04:48 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 57 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I'm now 52 plus change. Served in the US Navy over two decades ago. "Enjoyed" two WestPacs, leaving my wife behind. Didn't get to meed my elder son until he had been around for six months.
And yet.
And yet, when I read your blog about departure day, my heart was cut to the quick. All told, probably over 200,000 spouses have had to bear the pain and burden of saying, "goodbye" for this campaign in the greater war against the enemy. Like Ben Stein (OpinionJournal, 8/22), I thank you, each and every one. Your husband may indeed earn a medal; you too, Sarah, deserve one too, as do all spouses who wait.
Stay strong; your Lt. is depending on you. Keep the faith, and may God hold you in His loving hand.
Jim
Posted by: Jim Shawley at August 23, 2004 02:06 AM (NZYmd)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
LANCE
A good article I missed (via
Macker's archives):
Lance Armstrong and Individual Glory
I'd write about it if I hadn't just spent most of the day writing a final exam for the grammar class I'm teaching next weekend. I'm worn out. Just read the article and imagine what I'd say.
Posted by: Sarah at
04:34 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 52 words, total size 1 kb.
1
New Rule: Cheering for Lance Armstrong doesn't make you an international cycling aficionado. Unless you can name one other rider in the Tour de France in the last 100 years, you're not a fan, you're just someone who likes it when America beats foreigners.
Bill Maher may be on to something.
Posted by: curveball at August 22, 2004 11:59 PM (XxIKf)
2
I can name several. My husband's college roommate is a major fan who introduced us to the sport. His whole family flew to France to see a couple of stages last year. I admit that I don't know everything about cycling, but I know at least as much as I do about football or golf.
Posted by: Sarah at August 23, 2004 01:31 AM (qi6n1)
3
Greg LeMond.
Guess that makes me a fan (oh, wait: He's an American, too. Guess that makes me someone who likes it...yep, I do. I really do like it when we beat foreigners!!). I do enjoy watching the sport, even though, like Sarah, I know very little about it. I even enjoy riding on the various rail-trails, even though I carry too much of me around when I do ride (I'm not overweight (obese by the formula?)--I just carry around a lot of spare energy).
Posted by: Jim Shawley at August 23, 2004 01:45 AM (NZYmd)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
WINTER WEAR
I finished two more projects this month. I'm working at a rate of a sweater per month during the deployment, which keeps me occupied. The first one is that pink and white sweater I was waiting on the yarn to finish. The second is for me too; I've always wanted to have a bright striped sweater. (I can never seem to get the colors to come out right when I take photos of my projects though.)
Posted by: Sarah at
12:46 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 80 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Sarah - wow. I can only crochet a straight line from here to China. I'm impressed!
Posted by: Kathleen A at August 22, 2004 01:16 PM (vnAYT)
2
You've still got one up on me, Kathleen. I can't crochet at all.
Sarah, thanks for sharing your work once again. Are the colors in the second sweater supposed to be more intense? I don't see any pink or white in the first sweater at all.
Posted by: Amritas at August 22, 2004 02:09 PM (HWqiN)
3
Wow. Great work.
And I love the hoodie. Those are my favorities!
Posted by: Tammi at August 23, 2004 08:40 AM (4Ls5e)
4
I wish I could do that - these are so beautiful, thank you for sharing those photos. What a talent!
Posted by: heidi at August 23, 2004 05:26 PM (COE1B)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
DISJOINT
Is it just me, or is this title -- Iraqi athletes object to Bush campaign ad: Soccer players say president shouldn't exploit their success -- a little different from the crux of the
article's content?
...
However, the Iraqi Olympic delegation accused journalists of deliberately provoking an angry response from their players.
“Our purpose is not to politicize the football team in any way,” Mark Clark, a consultant for the Iraqi Olympic Committee, said. “It seems the story was engineered.”
...
But Clark insisted journalists were wrong to take advantage of the athletes.
“It is a little naughty,” he said. “The players are not very sophisticated politically; they are a little naive. Whoever posed these questions knew that the reaction would be negative.
“It is possible something was lost in translation. It’s a free, new Iraq, and the players are entitled to their opinions but we are disappointed.”
IraqÂ’s soccer players once lived in fear of Uday Hussein, son of toppled dictator Saddam Hussein, who used to beat the soles of their feet or throw them in prison for slip-ups on the pitch.
Under current coach Adnan Hamd, they have defied the odds to reach the quarterfinals at the Athens Olympics, where they will play Australia on Saturday.
Posted by: Sarah at
04:40 AM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 210 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Looks like a case of trying to be "fair and balanced" while being anything but. If accused of being slanted, the writer could point to the the body of the article - knowing that many people will only see the title.
I wonder where Mark Clark stands politically, if anywhere. Can he be objective?
BTW, I think it is possible to be angry over having one's images etc. in an ad without necessarily being against the person the ad is for. I would not be too pleased if I were mentioned in a Bush ad without my permission, regardless of how I thought about Bush.
But that deals with mentioning me as an individual. Mentioning whole teams already in the public eye is arguably different.
And who knows what the journalists asked the athletes. If I were asked, "Bush has a new ad saying that you want Americans to vote for him, so what do you think?" I'd be mad. I couldn't get the ad to play properly on my dial-up connection, so I don't really know, but I hope the ad is nothing like that. What little I saw did not give me that impression. I assume the ad is saying that Bush's policies freed the athletes. Not that they endorse him. Is that wrong?
Posted by: Amritas at August 22, 2004 06:09 AM (vDqr8)
2
THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU!!! My Mom said she heard about this all night on TV - but I couldn't find it anywhere. I'm posting the link (with a hattip to you) on ITM, Nabil's blog and others. You are a gem!
Posted by: Kathleen A at August 22, 2004 01:18 PM (vnAYT)
3
An Iraqi whose native tongue is Arabic, and in Greece for the Olympics is watching Bush's TV ads? Not to mention the fact that the ad doesn't even show or talk about the Iraqi athletes! But then again, SI is part of the same company as CNN. And we all KNOW Ted Turner called the 9/11 degenerates 'brave.'
Posted by: Tanker Schreiber at August 22, 2004 04:48 PM (nL894)
4
Tanker,
For the record, I don't think there was some directive from Ted Turner or even SI's editorial staff or whoever to distort. I think some reporters, imagining what a Bush ad must be like (vile, of course), asked the athletes unintentionally inflammatory questions about an ad they hadn't seen and they gave inflammatory answers. The problem with media bias isn't people scheming to fool the masses; it's reporters whose longtime assumptions are so deeply ingrained that they are not aware of them.
Posted by: Amritas at August 23, 2004 01:46 AM (A8VTg)
5
Mark Clark is a U.S. government employee.
He worked for the CPA as a public affairs specialist.
Posted by: gnomon at August 23, 2004 06:10 PM (6XPqE)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
BACKBONE
When the left-wing minions descended upon me a few months ago, spewing hatred and insults, it hurt. It hurts to be called names and told you're stupid and worthless. At that time, I found comfort in asking myself What Would Dubya Do? This is a man who has entire movies made about how worthless he is, yet he still manages to sleep at night. In terms of dealing with criticism and being self-confident, President George W. Bush is my personal hero. Whenever I feel down about myself, I remind myself that he deals with far worse every day.
I've read a couple of places today about how John Kerry is trying to get the FEC to shut down the SwiftVets ad. In my book, that makes Kerry about as spineless and weak-hearted as I am. I'm not a politician, so I'm allowed the luxury of feeling hurt when someone speaks bad of me; Kerry better get used to it if he plans on running the most hated country in the world.
I agree with LGF commenter William (found via Greyhawk) that this speaks volumes about Kerry's character.
While this is amusing and pathetic on the surface, what started as questions about Kerry's Vietnam era activity, Kerry has now turned into nothing less than a battle for free speech.
After Michael Moore's propaganda film, Bush never suggested it should be silenced.
After the moveon.org attack ads, Bush never suggested they should be silenced.
It's called freedom of speech (though Moore has moved perilously close to treason with his film while our troops are engaged in countries abroad).
Now Kerry seeks to silence free speech, because it's critical of his past.
For the blogosphere community, this has now moved past mocking the media for their absurdly obvious bias, and has become serious.
Kerry has changed the game with this move to shut down free speech.
If the media remain complicit now, they're not being complicit in smearing the SwiftVets, they're complicit in shutting down free speech -- the foundation of our society.
The "progressives" throw around labels of "fascism" and demonize John Ashcroft and Bush, but this has now become a battle for the country.
I don't think I'm exaggerating here. This has now become quite serious.
It is indeed serious. I grappled with this issue on my janky little blog -- whether to block certain commenters or close the comments section -- because I believe that people have the right to say what they think, even if it hurts my feelings. Shouldn't a presidential candidate in the United States of America believe in that as well?
MORE TO GROK:
More whining here. And Bunker writes about the media's fear.
Posted by: Sarah at
04:31 AM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 450 words, total size 3 kb.
1
I've been trying to give Kerry the benefit of the doubt, but this does it.
Sadly, one possible response to the WWDD question (nice alliteration) is that Dumbya don't cause he's too dumb. And/or insensitive.
Kerry, OTOH, is swift (SWIFT boat, get it?) to act on any threat, whether it be a terrorist or a homegrown critic. That's the kind of man I want in office. Decisive. So decisive he constantly makes contradictory decisions. But at least he uses his mind unlike the pretender for the throne, right? And he went to Vietnam nam nam nam ... (echoing)
Seriously, the issues you and Kerry face are not the same. You were being attacked on your own property. You have a right to defend it. So does Kerry - just like Chomsky. When Chomsky came under fire at his site, comments were taken down. Sad but not censorship. Censorship is the suppression of expression beyond one's own property. There are limits to what I will tolerate in my own domain, but with certain exceptions (e.g., libel) I will not impose the limits on those beyond it.
But here, Kerry is crossing the line and trying to impose his will beyond his domain. That is not someone I want messing with *my* domain.
Posted by: Amritas at August 22, 2004 05:53 AM (vDqr8)
2
Marc, you had me worried for a second. I thought you might have gone over to the dark side!
Posted by: Mike at August 22, 2004 02:09 PM (PDh3/)
3
Mike,
Whoa, I didn't realize how convincing I was getting. Some afterthoughts:
When I wrote,
"Decisive. So decisive he constantly makes contradictory decisions."
I meant to say something about how the quantity of "decisions" counts more than their quality (i.e., their consistency).
The main point I was trying to get at, however poorly made, was that Sarah does have the right to delete comments or remove them entirely from *her* blog if she wishes, whereas Kerry does not have a right to silence others *not* using his property. In short, Sarah was and is not a censor, which is what Kerry is trying to be. A censor for president? Never.
But force-loving Leftists would say "yes," though they would object to the word "censor." They are the good guys and only bad guys "censor." Like Bush. So why didn't Bush censor his opponents? Because they were small- r right! Uh huh.
Posted by: Amritas at August 23, 2004 01:41 AM (A8VTg)
4
Ha, Marc, it's like what we were saying about Sexual Harrassment Panda:
Gerald: You see, Kyle, we live in a liberal democratic society. And Democrats make sexual harrassment laws. These laws tell us what we can and can't say in the workplace and what we can and can't do in the workplace.
Kyle: Isn't that fascism?
Gerald: No! Because we don't call it fascism. Do you understand?
(Heh, it's not censorship if we don't call it censorship...)
Posted by: Sarah at August 23, 2004 01:55 AM (qi6n1)
5
The Sleeping Giant Awakens!
I am an Air Force vet. Vietnam and the 2 Gulf Wars. I have never done anything truly heroic. I take the Senior NCO Creed to heart. I believe in "Fly, Fight and WIN!" I spent last year in the desert. I left my wife and children to serve. I went and joined my daughter. My daughter is there now again, for the fourth time.
The John Kerry situation has brought back a lot of issues that I have kept hidden. I have had the honor of serving and we were permitted to win. That has meant more to me than I can say. The history of the world created by our unceremonious political removal from Vietnam is documented, but not well portrayed.
We were portrayed by John Kerry, and it coated us with his slime. That he is even being considered as Commander In Chief just makes my skin crawl. The same people that spit on us when we came home are his core supporters. This time around, they feel the politically correct necessity to say they support our troops, but oppose the war. Lip service only. They lie. They hate anyone who loves this country enough to actually stand up to protect it.
My heart goes out to the people who have lost loved ones. I know it must be hard. But to betray what they stood for because of your hurt is wrong. Good people died in Vietnam, Iraq and in all wars. To be quick to surrender in their memory is to betray them, and betray your country.
Protest all you want before the war is waged. Once the war has begun, it is time to truly support our troops by permitting them to fight and win. To be permitted to only fight and die and have the country change course only leaves our military, and our homeland more vulnerable.
The consequences of pulling out of Vietnam were enormous, but would pale in comparison to pulling out of Iraq. Terrorists have struck on our home soil. They are betting that we will lose our nerve, thanks to Somalia and Vietnam. The greatest military in the history of mankind can be totally undermined by cowards back home. It doesn't take courage to spout anti military and anti American garbage to a frothing ignorant crowd. It can actually get you the easy babes of the "movement".
What would the world look like if we had been given the opportunity to win in Vietnam? Without Jane "Hanoi Jane" Fonda and John Kerry and the communist sympathizers undermining us? 2 1/2 million Cambodians would be alive. Untold South Vietnamese would not have been murdered. We would not have to approach every skirmish wondering whether the "Peace in our time" crowd would succeed in undermining us.
Does anyone think we gained respect because we abandoned Vietnam? We lost respect. We provided future enemies with an exploitable weakness. If we had never entered Vietnam, nobody would have cared. But to go and quit is the worst. We can never let it happen again.
The untold story of the first Gulf War was the influence of those hard-core Vietnam vets that remained. In their hearts was NO QUIT! WE WILL NOT let that happen again! They could finally feel the sun shine on them again. The darkness of Vietnam will always be with them, but they could finally find peace.
Not so for the vets that were not part of it. I served stateside for the first Gulf War. My older brother, also a Vietnam vet, went. I was denied the opportunity. My reserve unit was not called up. I was requested by the active duty, but was held by my unit. That is one reason why this one is personal. I did go. I thought maybe I was too old, but I was called this time. I made my experience count. I am proud to have had the opportunity.
If the John Kerry crowd wins, we bail and America loses. It will all be for naught once again.
Would I go again? In a heartbeat. It is that important. To "spare" us, and suffer a terrible attack on our home soil would be the ultimate injustice.
We are doing the right thing. We have good people willing to sacrifice everything. Everyone I talked to in Iraq would gladly extend indefinitely if it would assure victory. Vigilant was more than a word. We may be a little too PC, but it will only help us in history if we win. If we abandon our troops mission, and bring them home, it may save their lives, but only at the expense of many innocent victims. We are trained and equipped to fight. It is our job. We have begun; we MUST be permitted to finish.
Vietnam vets don't want to bash Kerry. We have all tried very hard to put it behind us. John Kerry burned and branded us. He caused us to fight and die without the valor of winning. He married nice rich women and had a nice comfy life in the Senate. So be it, was our feelings. It is over. But by making his self-serving service his prime reason for being qualified to be president, he has awakened us. Painfully awakened us. We were disgraced, but we were never weak.
We are old now, but we still have heart. Our battle cry is "NEVER AGAIN!" The greatly abused sleeping giant is awake again, and forced to make a stand. My sleepless nights have returned. What was deeply buried is now deeply felt. We stood up during Vietnam. Our service was not supported. They were wrong then. They are wrong now. History has been hijacked. What should have been was undermined. WE were undermined.
This time we are home, and we can make a difference. We do not have to be ashamed any longer. Our mission is now to make sure that what happened to our generation NEVER HAPPENS AGAIN! We must stand up and be counted one more time. This is our battle, and we must win.
The change during Vietnam happened while we were over there. We had no influence. This time, we are here. We have an obligation to support our troops. Not with cowardly lip service, but with action. We need to make ourselves heard, and we need to make a difference. Our country needs us once again. Most important...VOTE! Have our voices heard! Our country needs our experience, knowledge and ability one more time. We can no longer hide our loyalty to our great country. Stand up and be counted! Write, talk to friends and family. Let them know how you feel. Permit our troops to win this one. "I'm mad as hell, and I'm not going to take this any more!"
Your country needs your service one more time. After we win, you can finally truly sleep. You will have accomplished your mission and won your war! I am proud of all of us. Stand up. Be proud! WELCOME HOME!
Posted by: Dave at August 25, 2004 03:06 AM (qmtI/)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
MINI-SERIES
I remember last year there was a
mini-series about Hitler on TV, and everyone was worried that it was too sympathetic. Even today, sixty years later, people don't want a personable Hitler. So why in the hell do we have a mini-series on
9/11 through the terrorists' eyes? I don't want to know what was going on in their lives to make them do these things, I don't want to watch them prepare to board the planes, I don't want to see the crash of Flight 93 from anyone but Tood Beamer's point of view, and I certainly don't want to give the 9/11 hijackers any more publicity and glory for the heinous thing that they did. I think that's disgusting.
That Hitler mini-series took 60 years. Maybe in 2060, when it's history, they can make a mini-series about that garbage, but it's not history when some of the collaborators are still alive and kickin' and being released by Germans.
This sure isn't the 9/11 movie Lileks envisioned.
Posted by: Sarah at
03:40 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 170 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Just think: It takes a lot of people to make a two-hour drama and to buy the rights for the US (or anywhere else in the world). That's a lot of people who aren't getting nauseous over the thought of propagating the message that
"the hijackers were all quite ordinary."
Yup, jus' plain ol' folks, killin' thousands.
Is this how desensitized people have become?
Posted by: Amritas at August 22, 2004 06:14 AM (vDqr8)
2
I'm sure it will be on Arabic TV very shortly. They can run it along with the Egyptian production of the Protocols of the Elders of Zion.
Posted by: Tanker Schreiber at August 22, 2004 04:54 PM (nL894)
3
Tanker,
It saddens me to say that the prospects for international sales of the film are probably very ... good (gag). Even people in the Great Satan want to see it.
Posted by: Amritas at August 23, 2004 01:33 AM (A8VTg)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
August 21, 2004
PAINTBALL
I've only played paintball once, back when I was in the ROTC class, and I only had one kill that day. It was from very far away and only after I shot about ten million paintballs at him did I finally kill him. But I did hit him, as Cartman would say, squaa in the nuts. Let me at
Osama and Saddam for a repeat performance. Too bad they're just look-alikes.
Posted by: Sarah at
05:32 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 73 words, total size 1 kb.
DARK STAR SAFARI
I've been meaning to write about
Dark Star Safari since I finished it, but I just haven't made the time yet. I'm making it now.
Beth recommended this book. Since I read The Power of One last year and went from zero knowledge of South African society to at least a passing level, I thought I'd give Dark Star Safari a try. I know that there's always a lot more to learn about foreign continents.
Beth's review of the book leaned towards the parallels with Iraq:
Reading the book has led me to ponder to comparisons, America and Africa, and Iraq and Africa. Theroux's book could/should serve as a stark warning of some major mistakes that could be made in trying to promote a democracy in Iraq. What it comes down to more than anything else is do the Iraqi's want a true democracy? And if they do, are they willing to go thru the struggle, take the responsibility, and resist those who would hinder the outcome?
That's an interesting parallel to make, one that I had forgotten Beth had made until I looked it up again now. Setting up the conditions for people to be free won't work if the people don't yearn for freedom. Similarly, setting up the conditions for progress won't work if people can't see the big picture.
When I was a French tutor at my college, I noticed an interesting phenomenon: students memorized formulas for putting together hypotheticals. I tried hard to teach them to think of the meaning attached to the hypothetical sentences. I encouraged them to think of what they wanted to say and then use the fitting tenses. They ignored me; the formulas were easier. My students invented intricate mnemonic devices to remember which tenses went together, completely abandoning meaning as a criterion. No matter how many times I tried to explain to them that they should view French as a language and not a math problem, they didn't want to listen. I always saw that chart in our book as the give-a-man-a-fish method: the students couldn't extrapolate from it or do anything that didn't plug neatly into the formula. But the students didn't want the teach-a-man-to-fish method because it was harder than mimicry.
I thought a lot about the giving vs teaching fish proverb while reading Dark Star Safari. Theroux is certainly an Afrophile, but all of his observations, no matter how much he tried to provide context, presented Africa in a horrifying light. Theroux does not sugarcoat the situation; he presents the good with the bad, which is admirable since I'm wont to smell agenda in everything I read. What he taught me is that Africa is a beautiful and mysterious continent that is completely screwed.
The problem Theroux lays out is that the Africans have been given so many fish that they'll never bother to learn to fish: they always know another handout is around the corner. All of the relief workers and foreign aid are killing the African initiative; Theroux relates countless stories of Africans who shrug off problems and say that aid workers will fix it. Foreigners move to Africa, start programs, get run out of town or move on when they get frustrated, and the whole program crumbles and dies. Theroux painted a dismal portrait of the endless cycle of foreign aid and dwindling African spirit. The Africans don't see the big picture of helping themselves, because in the short-run another aid worker will come and do it for them.
Kim du Toit has advocated letting Africa sink. The first time I read his essay, I thought it was too extreme. Now I'm not so sure. I'm not saying I advocate "a high wall around the whole continent, all the guns and bombs in the world for everyone inside" as Kim does, in typical Kim fashion. But I don't see a solution to Africa's deep-rooted problems anywhere on the horizon.
I thought Bill Gates was the height of magnanimity when he gave millions to AIDS in Africa; now it seems like fish-giving at its worst. Throwing money at the problem will not do anything to solve Africa's suffering. I sure can't offer a solution, but I know it ain't money.
Good book. Check it out if you're looking for a depressingly realistic read.
MORE TO GROK:
I forgot that Bunker wrote a similar post (complete with giving/teaching fish idea) back in July. I must've subconsciously plagiarized him...
Posted by: Sarah at
05:12 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 747 words, total size 5 kb.
1
A good friend of mine is from Kenya, and when her father visited he was amazed with the simple things in the US like reliable water and electricity, gasoline and grocery stores. He also commented on the scarcity of police presence. This was from a man who lives and works in the capital city of Kenya, not a small town or village.
Individually, I've met many hardworking Africans. As a group, I'm afraid you might be right about the problems and culture. We'll never be able to just walk away, but maybe we should.
Posted by: Ted at August 21, 2004 07:42 AM (ZjSa7)
2
Excellent post! I guess for me it comes down to thinking the whole world shares America's work ethic. And while many countries do (and some even kick our butts in it) there are many that don't. I've never understood the mentality of those who shrug their soldiers and accept their miserable lot in life.
Reading your post I was also thinking of the comparisons you could make between Africa and our public education system.
Posted by: Beth at August 21, 2004 12:54 PM (hzXG1)
3
I think that alot of places accept their lot in life because that is just how things are. If you live your whole life in a situation, it is normal to you, and not the bleak existence that we might be tempted to think it.
Is Africa the result of world welfare? Are there other areas of the world with the same problems? How has this been overcome in the past, and what have been successful methods of reform?
Posted by: John at August 21, 2004 05:29 PM (+Ysxp)
4
John,
It wasn't that long ago that the whole world was like Africa. Life anywhere was miserable, and that was the norm. Freedom as we know it did not exist; it was an idea that had to be created. But some places of the world got out of this rut and others did not. Why? Jared Diamond offers an environmental answer in Guns, Germs, and Steel but I think there is more to it than that. Individuals make decisions that affect others which in turn affect others. The positive chain of decisions that resulted in America originated in the West. But it could have occurred somewhere else. The ability to choose is genetic; the choice itself is not.
As far as I can tell all the places in the world that rose up did so on their own. Japan did not become a world power through global welfare. Within less than a century, it had conquered a large fraction of the Earth - and that was *before* it was occupied and rebuilt! Japan modernized itself.
One ex-colony that has done very well is South Korea. But it paid a terrible price: namely, imperial Japanese oppression.
My view: Let everyone sink and do nothing unless they threaten us (four letters: I-R-A-N).
Posted by: Amritas at August 22, 2004 06:35 AM (vDqr8)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
August 20, 2004
VFW
I feel really sorry for
these VFW guys. They feel so absolutely betrayed by John Kerry. Forget the Purple Hearts; Kerry came home and denounced his brothers in arms. I can't even imagine how it must feel to be a Vietnam vet who sees Kerry cash in on the war hero image.
Posted by: Sarah at
07:45 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 54 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I feel for them too, and I certainly hope that the his after-vietnam actions are brought more into focus. This more than anything will damage him. I know alot of vets that feel we would not have 'lost' vietname if it wasn't for the likes of the anti-war movement.
Why the hell would we want to elect one of the principle anti-war players from that era to lead this country during a time of war? Do we want to 'lose' another one?
Posted by: John at August 20, 2004 08:26 AM (crTpS)
2
"I certainly hope that the his after-vietnam actions are brought more into focus."
They are more certain than whatever he did in Vietnam.
"Why the hell would we want to elect one of the principle anti-war players from that era to lead this country during a time of war?"
Because he's not Dumbya.
"Do we want to 'lose' another one?"
Wouldn't it be worth it if only Dumbya were gone? The whole world would love us. Iran would never bother us again after we give them the nuclear fuel they need. /LLL
Posted by: Amritas at August 20, 2004 08:42 AM (MhqjV)
Posted by: rfidtag at August 20, 2004 11:02 AM (XxIKf)
4
IMHO his actions after his return is where the focus needs to be. The medals are awarded, can't change that (I don't think) but his actions afterwards speak volumes. He betrayed his brothers in arms. He turned against everything they stood for. How do we know he won't betray us in the same way?
My thoughts, once burned twice shy. I have no faith in him at all.
But then again, that's just MHO
Posted by: Tammi at August 20, 2004 01:18 PM (4Ls5e)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
August 19, 2004
TEXAS
Thus, I expect to see Germans, the French, Spaniards, the Dems and others dancing on the streets and boulevards as soon Europe is liberated from those unwelcome foreigners.
Keep dreaming, Nelson. I have heard so much whining lately about the poor German economy that it's not even funny. They hate us to death, but they sure don't want us to leave. Oh, poor Kitzingen, where one in three inhabitants is American. Their poor gasthauses will have to close. Cry me a river.
I saw a military commercial tonight that basically said "don't start packing just yet", but I'm ready.
Send me to Texas.
Posted by: Sarah at
04:02 PM
| Comments (9)
| Add Comment
Post contains 105 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Off Topic, but go look at the 8/18 "Nation" section of the Wash. Times, and their take on Kerry's visit to the VFW convention.
Also see the same date and Thursday's WT for excerpts from the "Unfit" book. I'm convinced.
Also, Sarah, BE SURE and get everybody there registered and lined up with absentee ballots!! See the base's Voting Assistance Officer. We need to not let him win!
Jim
Posted by: Jim Shawley at August 19, 2004 04:28 PM (CnYsu)
2
Maybe Maryland, it's kinda nice. If you're really unlucky it'll be the NTC. Having lived nearby, well, it's spaghetti western desert out that way.
Kalroy
Posted by: Kalroy at August 19, 2004 06:38 PM (q1aeu)
3
Yay! Come to Texas! I already know a few people who have moved here for similar reasons. Most people think we're crazy, but we like to think that we're the only sane people left in the world. While I admit that we're not without our problems, coming home from Chicago or anywhere else is always a truly wonderful thing (as long as the air conditioner's working).
Posted by: Jeremiah at August 19, 2004 09:10 PM (0FAew)
4
Blech, you don't want to come to Hood.
I miss Germany, I wish they were not changing stuff, I would love to go back, but with less than 5 years left, I doubt it would happen anyways.
Posted by: Jen at August 20, 2004 01:41 AM (n8GLX)
5
Actually, we *do* want to go to Hood. In fact, we tried to trade our Germany for someone else's Hood, but since we didn't have a pinpoint assignment until a week before we left, we couldn't. Where you live is all "state of mind", and I'd rather be in the dumpiest, most run-down post in the US than on the nicest one in Europe.
Posted by: Sarah at August 20, 2004 01:47 AM (nQmE2)
6
Here's the URL to paste for the comment on Kerry's speech to VFW
http://www.washingtontimes.com/national/20040817-112443-7056r.htm
Posted by: Oda Mae at August 20, 2004 02:08 AM (JJnLz)
7
The only connection I have to the military is my brother, who's in the Navy, so I can't tell you much about Hood (although I have been to Gitmo...heh) from the inside, but I can tell you that it *is* comparatively isolated. Austin, one of the best cities in America, is only a short (for Texas) drive away, though. Waco's close, too, and it's not so bad aside from select wackos who are attracted to its anonymity (it's no Austin, though).
Posted by: Jeremiah at August 20, 2004 09:46 AM (0FAew)
8
Ms Sarah:
We would welcome your and your valiant husband with open arms here in Texas... and don't forget... EVERYTHING is bigger in Texas!
Posted by: Madfish Willie at August 20, 2004 10:03 AM (f4tF1)
9
Sarah, you are welcome to come to my house on the coast to rest up.
I just got back from a month in Australia, I was so homesick for Texas accents, live oaks, and real newspapers, (theirs are all tabloids).
Posted by: Ruth H at August 20, 2004 01:14 PM (Zpif2)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
FUN FIRSTS FOR AN ARMY WIFE
1. the first time you look at someone's lapel and address him with the correct rank
2. the first time you see a full bird on a lapel
3. the first time you see an Airman and have no idea how to address him
4. the first time you see a Marine and wonder what in the heck is wrong with his blurry camoflauge
5. the first time you correctly call it a weapon instead of a gun
6. the first time you correctly call it a post instead of a base
7. the first time you use military terminology that makes your husband say, "Where did you learn that?"
8. the first time you realize that your friends from back home have no idea what you're talking about
9. the first time you get a hooah when you're teaching grammar
10. and the pinnacle: the first time you explain to a soldier the difference between his AARTS and his ATAARS
Anyone got any other good firsts?
MORE:
Carla reminded me of one. How about
11. the first time you spell something out in the military alphabet without stumbling
Posted by: Sarah at
04:25 AM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
Post contains 201 words, total size 1 kb.
1
The first time I came across you blog. I really like it.
Posted by: sTEVE at August 19, 2004 09:13 AM (8HxzN)
2
I'd ask my sister who's a military wife, but she probably doesn't count as she's also ex-military.
I think your list should pertain to civilians as well.
Posted by: John at August 19, 2004 09:19 AM (+Ysxp)
3
It could also apply to journalists. I heard one on NPR yesterday refer to CH-47 Chinook helicopters as "Chinook 47s". Close.
Posted by: Mike at August 19, 2004 12:44 PM (MqNKC)
4
Hahaha to #4...
Well, along the lines of #10: the first time he uses a bunch of acronyms in a sentence and you don't have to stop to ask him what they mean.
The first time someone asks you his MOS and you can confidently state the number.
The first time you remember exactly which uniforms are Alphas, Bravos, Charlies, Deltas.
Posted by: Carla at August 19, 2004 12:56 PM (r5M6F)
5
Hearing taps played at 2300 for the first time. Brought tears to my eyes.
Posted by: Ashley at August 19, 2004 01:42 PM (ZfIIU)
6
The first time you say 19:30 instead of 7:30 without even thinking about it...and your husband says, "good job on your army time honey". This just happened to me about five minutes ago!!
Posted by: Erin at August 19, 2004 02:32 PM (wvUNc)
7
Just found your blog, by way of Michelle Malkins site, (it was a round about "by way of"). I enjoyed looking around.
God bless you and your dear husband. Keep your spirits up and know that there are many, many people who appreciate not only what your husband does but also the strength it takes to wait.
Posted by: Pamela at August 19, 2004 03:43 PM (w8c17)
8
I'm neither military nor a wife, but military time and alphabet are very useful to me, and I use them all the time. That Peace Dividend ain't just cool technology!
Posted by: Dominic at August 20, 2004 10:32 AM (7jp9w)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
109kb generated in CPU 0.0278, elapsed 0.1007 seconds.
63 queries taking 0.0829 seconds, 288 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.