August 18, 2004
LINKS
There actually were
heroes in Hollywood. At one time.
And read Bjorn Staerk's post on Islam and all of the comments.
Posted by: Sarah at
07:38 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 23 words, total size 1 kb.
1
The pro-ban, Islamocidal types in Staerk's comments are like Leftist cartoons of Rightist hawks. As one commenter wrote,
"This is not a conflict of civilisations, it's a conflict of lunacies."
Those deskbound lunatics are a far cry from the military personnel fighting the war on terror for real who know that this isn't armageddon. The US can win this war without sinking to the level of the Islamists.
As for the Hollywood link, here's my favorite comment by "kfflint":
"But I don't think its fair to disparage the actors for not joining the military ...
"I do not look down on my many friends who have never served. They have accomplished great things in their own many ways.
That said, if some great calamity such as WWII arose, do you not think the young of today, those kids with piercings, loud music, unkept hair and such would heed the call? I think they would. I think just like that generation in the 1940's...a group of slacking young men no one would have ever expected greatness from in a different reality....the kids today too would achieve legendary greatness ...
"Heroes come in many forms folks. Remember, people don't have to carry a rifle or storm a beach to be a hero."
Of course, that doesn't justify celiberal behavior. Hollywood stars can do better, and that doesn't necessarily mean joining the military. They can show their support in other ways.
The fact is - for better or worse - that people on the whole do not perceive this war as an existential struggle for America. They haven't necessarily forgotten 9/11; they just don't think terrorism could touch them, and even if it, 99% of the nation would still be intact. If America's very existence were threatened, everyone would be signing up. But America has never encountered such a grave threat, and I hope that it never will.
Posted by: Amritas at August 18, 2004 12:09 PM (lzw32)
2
They haven't necessarily forgotten 9/11; they just don't think terrorism could touch them, and even if it, 99% of the nation would still be intact.
I live in NYC and I was there on 9/11. New Yorkers have not forgotten.
The interesting thing is that even though we lived through it, most NYCers are mad as hell with GWB and his false war. Don't believe me? Watch...The City will speak for itself.
Posted by: rfidtag at August 18, 2004 05:03 PM (4M6f+)
3
Sarah, what did you think of the Bjorn Staerk post?
Posted by: Coriolanus at August 19, 2004 01:00 AM (KZeI/)
4
I would like to add Glenn Miller to the list of heros, if possible. What a guy!
Posted by: heidi at August 19, 2004 12:02 PM (jTJ4z)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
August 17, 2004
RACISM
Some people can find
racism in anything.
Posted by: Sarah at
06:11 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 9 words, total size 1 kb.
BASE CLOSURES
My co-worker said that the German radio is announcing the base closures and that our European-based soldiers are not even returning from Iraq, but instead are heading directly back to the States and all family members will follow them and bases will close. For almost a year, we've been hearing that this absolutely will not be happening, and GEN B.B. Bell even made a series of commercials assuring family members that their soldiers would be coming back to Germany. Weird that the Germans are announcing something totally different than what the President said.
Developing, as Drudge says...
MORE:
Just to make sure we're all on the same page: I believe GEN Bell ten thousand times more than I believe the German radio. I think what they're putting out is ridiculous misinformation. I'd love to beat your two weeks for outprocessing, Deskmerc, but I know it ain't gonna happen.
Posted by: Sarah at
03:29 AM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 152 words, total size 1 kb.
1
No figgin' way that will happen. You think the paper pushers and REMFs that force you into the byzantine labrynth that is clearing post would allow it?
Nut uh, no way. It took me two weeks to clear post where you are, and it would NOT BE FAIR for anyone to escape such a fate.
Posted by: Jason at August 17, 2004 11:34 AM (0iK+f)
2
The news stories I saw yesterday that had the most information said the troops from Germany wouild be relocated in 2006. We all know the military doesn't go at much faster than a snail's pace in things like this.
I'm sure Germany is freaking out. I'm sure it will hurt their economy. Can't say I feel too badly about that. Justice sure can suck when it bites you in the ass.
Posted by: Beth at August 17, 2004 06:46 PM (lMEGF)
3
Bush did say it was part of a plan whose total implementation would take a decade. Don't know what that really means though (tommorrow or summer 2014?).
Kalroy
Posted by: Kalroy at August 17, 2004 07:20 PM (q1aeu)
4
I've got a link up on this, Army Times reports that we won't start moving out of Europe until 2006 and it will take the better part of three years to accomplish. For what it's worth.
http://www.sgthook.com/archives/2004/08/17/pull-back/
Posted by: Sgt Hook at August 18, 2004 05:58 AM (olp4a)
5
There's this as well:
http://www.defenselink.mil/news/Aug2004/n08162004_2004081610.html
Posted by: Pete at August 18, 2004 07:31 AM (Qpigl)
6
nobody has made a definate decision yet. all these reports are just things that could happen.
In the military, you dont react to something until
you have orders in hand. Things sometimes change even after they start.
Posted by: jonathan c. at January 07, 2005 02:50 PM (6e5qe)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
August 16, 2004
REALIGNMENT
Another reason why I, as a military wife, don't want to vote Kerry:
I want to go home.
Posted by: Sarah at
03:29 PM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 20 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Some are already 'questioning the timing' of this announcement (that has been in the works for the last three years)... unbelievable!!!
Posted by: Madfish Willie at August 16, 2004 07:58 PM (S/EPF)
2
There are some that would question the timing of a beautiful sunset if it helps Bush.
Posted by: John at August 17, 2004 12:44 PM (+Ysxp)
3
John,
Those blasted Republicans at NASA must be messing with the sun! No wonder we're suffering from global warming!
Posted by: Amritas at August 17, 2004 01:17 PM (b8rMZ)
4
Then vote for Bush. Early and often
Posted by: Tom at August 18, 2004 02:03 PM (kmiNS)
5
You know, it's getting just a little bit tiring how everytime Kerry takes a firm stand on an issue, the right-wing attack machine immediately finds something Kerry said ten minutes ago that totally contradicts it.
What's the big deal? Just because Kerry tackles an issue as decisively as a woman moving furniture around her living room, it doesn't mean he can't lead.
Get off your high horses, people!
Posted by: Liberal Larry at August 19, 2004 02:25 AM (TRrnq)
6
"as decisively as a woman moving furniture around her living room"
I'm shocked, Liberal Larry, shocked. How can you be so sexist? I'm calling the PC police.
Men can be indecisive about furniture too!
Posted by: Amritas at August 19, 2004 07:27 AM (ZpAcY)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
CPT PATTI
Tim mis-labeled
his blog when he called CPT Patti the "sweetest woman on the planet"; he should have called her the sweetest and best smelling woman on the planet. I don't know if she's taken a billion showers after leaving Iraq, but the first thing I noticed about her was how downright delicious she smelled. And then it was her radiant smile.
Tim and CPT Patti stopped here on their way home from leave in Italy. I originally thought nothing could've been nicer than my trip to Frankfurt to meet Tim, but the addition of Patti was nothing short of heavenly. She was personable and interesting and genuine and just plain great. And of course Tim was the Tim we know and love. They were just excellent together, and it was the best lunch I've had in a long time. I could've talked to them for two days instead of two hours, and I'm humbled that they drove out of the way just to see me.
And I told Tim that if he ever gets the itch, he's welcome to write a guest post here whenever he wants.
Posted by: Sarah at
12:31 PM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
Post contains 192 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Sarah - that is so cool!!!! I always told Tim that Capt Patti's smile was captivating. But then that smile of yours in sitting next to her is quite radiant too. That is a great picture for you to keep for "memories"!
Posted by: Toni at August 16, 2004 02:10 PM (SHqVu)
2
Thanks for sharing that, it's nice to hear how Tim & Patti are doing and see see that picture. It's VERY good to see you smiling!!!
Posted by: Tammi at August 16, 2004 02:55 PM (4Ls5e)
3
Thanks for sharing your story - I miss Tim's posts..
Bryan
Posted by: Bryan Strawser at August 16, 2004 06:35 PM (SOmCX)
4
Great picture! I'm so glad Cpt. Patti and Tim came to visit you--what a great morale booster! I sure miss Tim's blog too; he was one of the best at keeping us posted on overall news re Iraq. I'm thankful that Patti made it home safely and that they can now spend well-deserved time together.
Your mama
Posted by: Nancy at August 17, 2004 12:45 AM (+jEfD)
5
Wow--very cool. The blogosphere is a neat thing, eh? Best to Tim and Patty, and of course you.
Posted by: david at August 17, 2004 01:07 AM (1+76a)
6
I love these cross-over stories.
It's just like when Superman would visit the Dynamic Duo in Gotham City.
Posted by: homebru at August 17, 2004 01:37 AM (l9dpT)
7
Sarah - wow! The picture came out great. I didn't know since I didn't have my "reading glasses" with me when I took it and you and Patti were just two smiling amorphous blobs in the viewfinder of your really neato 007 type camera.
Patti and I had a magnificent time having lunch with you...thanks for making the time. Patti said after we left that you are extremely intelligent and astonishingly thoughtful. She's just finding out what the rest of us already knew.
Bless you on your six month milestone...and please know that the emptiness of the separation is blissfully erased and replaced by the joy of rediscovering your mate. I find I appreciate my sweet, darling, wonderful wife more now than ever. And that is a really, really remarkable feeling. That you and Russ get to go through it is a blessing-in-waiting for you two.
Hi to Russ, your Mom and those others we have in common.
And thank you again.
Posted by: Tim at August 17, 2004 02:20 PM (8T/dS)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
TRIP
This is a trip: here's what happens when
a scientist meets a journalist.
Posted by: Sarah at
02:20 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 15 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Please, please don't call Ray Fair a scientist. He's a "social scientist." There's a big difference between scientists and social scientists: namely, social scientists are scientist wannabes who try to model "precisely" human behavior. Of course, their assumption of "rational" behavior flies in the face of reality--as we all know that humans don't always operate rationally.
Social scientists give scientists a bad reputation that they don't deserve.
Posted by: Can't win at August 18, 2004 04:54 PM (gUA7O)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
August 15, 2004
BEWILDERED
I just watched
A Few Good Men for the first time since I learned anything about the military. It's not sitting well with me. The moral dilemma is disconcerting, it's a lose-lose situation, and in the end I have no idea what I think. What do you do if you're a servicemember who's given an unlawful order? If you disobey, you may be punished. If you obey, you may be punished. That's a frightening dilemma. Sometimes there's what's right and what's right, and never the twain shall meet.
Posted by: Sarah at
04:29 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 90 words, total size 1 kb.
1
That's what gives the movie its power, Sarah. There are two stories being told concurrently: that of the Marines trapped by an unlawful order, and that of Danny McCaffrey, who grows to a full appreciation of his place as a lawyer and a Naval officer as a result of his involvement in the case.
Few stories have the moral power of this one.
Posted by: Francis W. Porretto at August 15, 2004 05:20 PM (MzH7h)
2
Do sensitive, nuanced, morally complex situations only exist in Hollywood?
Posted by: rfidtag at August 15, 2004 10:05 PM (XxIKf)
3
Been there, done that.
You don't obey it.
You stand there and get bitched out by your First Sargeant in front of your cohorts (civillian and military) and then you stand there and get bitched out by your commander.
In combat, however, I have no idea, I like to think I would refuse, unless it was the kind of thing that saved the life of my people. Hmmmm, now that I think of it, I don't see any ambiguity there either.
Now if you're lucky and you have a good supervisor he calls QA who calls the DCM (Deputy Charge of Maintenance) who comes down catches the tail end of the brow beating. He talks to QA, then talks to your supervisor, and you never hear anything at all after that.
Also, if you're lucky, you hear through the grapevine from a guy in the orderly room that the commander's door almost blew its hinges as the commander got bitched out for giving an order for an illegal repair.
Funny part is that we did eventually do the repair, but only because WE contacted depot and got both the procedure and permission for the repair.
Stacking of tolerances...
Kalroy
"We do the right thing because it is the right thing, not merely when it is convenient."
Ambassador D'Lenn, Babylon 5
Posted by: Kalroy at August 15, 2004 10:32 PM (q1aeu)
4
This is precisely the problem we tried to dissect in teaching Honor and Ethics at USAFA. An officer is expected to make decisions based on right and wrong. I guess that's one reason some folks don't like the military. The person who refuses to obey an unlawful order may be punished by the person giving it, but that decision will be eventually reviewed. Someone giving an unlawful order is in far more trouble.
The mothers and fathers of this country entrust their children to military officers, and expect them to do what's right.
Posted by: Mike at August 16, 2004 09:29 AM (MqNKC)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
QUESTIONS
I've come up with a few questions that I'd like to pose to military wives who think voting Kerry is in their best interest.
1. Kerry has recently been talking about reducing the number of troops in Iraq as soon as he gets into office. Would you support this measure, knowing that it might mean that your husband could be stretched even thinner and have less support and back-up on his missions?
2. Kerry has also said that the reduction of American troops will be made possible by the addition of foreign, especially Arab, troops. This question is rather hypothetical, given that to date no additional nations have agreed to send troops if Kerry were elected, but would you rather have your husband fighting alongside Arab soldiers instead of other Americans?
3. Kerry recently spoke out against the genocide in Sudan and said, "we must also start planning now for the possibility that the international community, acting through the United Nations, will be forced to intervene urgently to save the lives of the innocent." There's no question that the situation in Sudan is horrible, but would you want your husband to deploy there as part of a UN-led peacekeeping mission?
Yep, they're loaded questions. But the problem is that many wives hear the words "Kerry's gonna reduce the number of troops in Iraq" and they don't think about the fine print. A premature reduction of troops means less stability and more strain for those who are left there. Do we really want to vote for that?
Posted by: Sarah at
05:56 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 258 words, total size 2 kb.
1
I don't think it will matter who is in the Oval, we're in this for the long haul and I don't see a significant reduction in troops happening for at least 3-5 years. You're right though Sarah, he's playing to the yearnings of our wives and mothers.
Glad your hiatus wasn't a long one btw.
Posted by: Sgt Hook at August 16, 2004 12:01 AM (olp4a)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
August 14, 2004
LINKS
Links to keep you busy:
On Loathing Bush, by Victor Davis Hanson
"Journalists are our brothers," says a spokesman for al-Sadr. You don't say?
Bunker writes on altruism.
Now this is a cool photo.
Avery writes about ebonics.
And isn't the timing of the FL hurricanes just a little too...convenient?
Posted by: Sarah at
05:27 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 52 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Sarah - that was hysterical about the timing of the hurricane being a little bit too convenient. I'm glad to see you've still got your sense of sardonic humor. :-))
Posted by: Toni at August 14, 2004 10:34 AM (WgzvD)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
LAST
Kathleen A said that I don't take myself too seriously. I think that can be my focus for a while: until I find something I want to write about, I can just keep not taking myself seriously.
So without further ado...one of those stupid email forward things:
The Last...
Last cigarette: Never. I've never smoked in my life. I just don't get it.
Last alcoholic drink: A radler at dinner last night: Germans mix half beer and half lemonade, which I thought was disgusting when I first got here. It's grown on me though.
Last car ride: Last night, home from dinner with other wives, a British major, and a captain on R&R
Last kiss: Exactly six months ago today, when Blue 6 left
Last good cry: Two nights ago when I felt I had let LT A down by not visiting him at Landstuhl
Last library book: I'm too much of an "owner" to use the library -- I prefer to buy books so I can keep them forever. The last book I borrowed from a library would have to have been over two years ago in grad school.
Last book bought: Aztec, as a gift for one of my favorite old students (the one with the puppy) who is interested in the Aztecs and will be deploying soon for his second fun-filled year in Iraq.
Last book read: I just finished Dark Star Safari, which I may write about later.
Last movie seen in theaters: tried to go see Spiderman 2, but it was sold out. Before that...??? Starsky and Hutch, I think. It's been a while.
Last movie rented: Euro Trip, with friends. Silly, silly movie.
Last cuss word uttered: I have no idea. I haven't actually spoken a single word today, so I know it wasn't anything I said this morning.
Last beverage drank: apple juice
Last food consumed: honey nut cheerios
Last crush: I've been accused by Blue 6 of having a crush on nearly every Soldier I meet. They're all so wonderful.
Last phone call: my mother-in-law: we both got phone calls from my husband yesterday.
Last TV show watched: Happy Days, of course. That's all I watch on TV here.
Last time showered: as of now? yesterday morning. Soon to be repeated.
Last shoes worn: rainbow flip flops
Last CD played: the mix I made for Tim when I went to visit him in Frankfurt
Last item bought: a get-well card for LT A. Actually, not a get-well card, because all of them suck. They're all like "ah, you have a cold? You'll be better in no time" and are completely inappropriate. I had to buy a card that was actually listed under Miss You -- Kids. There is a line of military greeting cards here, but they only have "congrats on your promotion" and "you're retiring"; they need to branch out.
Last download: some new security update for Yahoo messenger
Last annoyance: Yesterday at work was like the Day of Bad Customers. People who want you to fill all of their paperwork out for you because they're too lazy to do it alone. People who show up right at closing time and make me stay 30 min late. People who never turned in financial aid paperwork and then expect a Pell Grant to materialize out of thin air when they register. All sorts of problems and drama.
Last disappointment: Thursday my husband was online and I missed him by six minutes.
Last soda drank: Pepsi One at work yesterday
Last thing written: my Friday Iraq Letters: Blue 6, Red 6, LT A, my brother-in-law, and my friend's husband
Last words spoken: Like I said, I haven't said anything today. It would've been saying goodbye when I got off the phone with my mother-in-law last night.
Last ice cream eaten: one of those mini Snickers bar ice cream treats
Last chair sat in: our brand new computer chair that I bought for my husband for his birthday
Last webpage visited: heh. The Iraq War Was Wrong site linked from LGF, where I found this list. I have no idea what it has to do with the Iraq war though. (And I really can't believe this person compared invading Iraq to hacky-sacking indoors. That site has to be a joke, right?)
Posted by: Sarah at
04:57 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 719 words, total size 4 kb.
1
Sarah - welcome back
for me...Last Webpage visited: Trying to Grok by Sarah brave wife of a soldier who keeps our spirits high and our pride higher...
Posted by: Kathleen A at August 14, 2004 10:23 AM (vnAYT)
2
Hey! Why is the American a Captain and my husband is a Brit soldier? We, er, he worked HARD to make Major. Please note it in the future or I will return to taunt you a second time. Pffft! (Great seeing you last night at dinner, by the way.)
Posted by: Oda Mae at August 14, 2004 12:41 PM (3dMjX)
3
Heh. Sorry, Oda Mae...humbly making the change now.
Posted by: Sarah at August 14, 2004 03:35 PM (a8bUi)
4
I have some Skechers rainbow flip flops - very comfortable. I call them my gay feet :-)
I looked for Aztec at the library but it was checked out, I'll look again when I return my current books. I like the library, it gives me a chance to buy books I'm not interested in enough to buy, but need something to read to fill the time.
Posted by: beth at August 14, 2004 05:28 PM (OAw2i)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
August 13, 2004
PERSPECTIVE
When I blog, I blog off the cuff. I type, I finish, I post. Which is why the fact that I've started several posts in the past few days and just erased them or saved them as drafts because I know they're garbage is startling. I don't have anything good to say. I'm stumped and I'm down on myself because I feel worthless.
And then the phone rang and I found out LT A will likely be in the hospital for up to six months. And I lost it.
There I was, carrying on because my blogging is not up to par, and then people with actual problems called and reminded me that "gaping shrapnel wounds" are more important than "feelings of inadequacy due to insufficient blog material". I don't think I've ever felt like a bigger idiot.
I'm not blogging anymore for a while, at least not until I have something to say.
Posted by: Sarah at
03:08 AM
| Comments (10)
| Add Comment
Post contains 156 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Sarah, check your email.
Posted by: Carla at August 13, 2004 10:40 AM (r5M6F)
2
Prayers for Lt. A.
And you do have something to say. I think summertime is slump time for blogging; all that heat.Don't worry, just keep writing.
Posted by: Rachel Ann at August 13, 2004 11:59 AM (+fHyg)
3
Sarah the point you're missing is that people who are suffering through what your friend is need to forget sometimes and your great blogging provides that to them (and all of us). Your insights are refreshing and you don't take yourself too seriously. I think you have important things to say - even if they are unrelated to the horrors of war. We blog to escape and to debate. Please continue blogging. We need your ideas.
Posted by: Kathleen A at August 13, 2004 01:09 PM (vnAYT)
4
Sarah,
If you quit blogging, you quit reaching out to hundreds of people. There may only be one person that you help each day, but you may make a difference in that one person's life by making them laugh, making them think, making them aware, making them care, and most important of all, making them connect with another human being. You are too critical of yourself. Accept your blogging as your contribution to this crazy, mixed up world, and be thankful God has given you the gift of writing your thoughts on the internet. Keep your chin up. You're entitled to a bad day now and then. Overall, count your blessings and make a difference! I love you!
Your mama
Posted by: Nancy at August 13, 2004 01:25 PM (+jEfD)
Posted by: OkieMinnie at August 13, 2004 03:42 PM (yozcs)
6
Prayers for Lt A, for sure. And comfort your way, too. Recharge and then come back to us.
Posted by: Princess Jami at August 13, 2004 06:41 PM (0gPLe)
7
If I may be so presumptious, I ditto your mom. I check in on you EVERY DAY, although I rarely comment. If you don't feel like commentating, at least link, please. You have a better line on what's going on, and link to things I like to see. I understand if you're getting a little burned out. (Even SDB, Whittle, Rachel Lucas, etc. do too. Don't dog yourself if you need a break.)
I'm a loyal fan, take some time if you need it. We'll still be here when you come back.
You and Blue6 are in my prayers.
Posted by: MargeinMI at August 13, 2004 06:56 PM (a5xWF)
8
I believe in the message that if we keep positive
and treat people well, making them laugh or
feel better about themselves we are helping.
Sometimes we have no idea we have helped someone
and then can learn years later you did and you
grow stronger from that.
Still, sometimes it is hard to see this and we
need time to get in contact with what brings us
our good spirits.
Take your time. rest, think, go to a funny movie,
eat candy, read a encouraging book, get in touch
with friends and talk about this.
The folks that have written the above comments
seem to care about you alot, they will wait
for you and I will bookmark your site so I can
come back and see you are spreading your cheer
as only you can. My prayers are with you and
the person hurt who will get well.
Posted by: cjg at August 13, 2004 11:33 PM (X0vnb)
9
My best to Lt. A, and hearty thanks as well. As far as your blogging goes (from a first time visitor) you're doing fine. Even the parts where you second guess your skill are readable and interesting, and isn't it ironic? don't you think? Hang in there, kiddo.
cheers,
M@
Posted by: M@ at August 14, 2004 06:24 PM (W/NM6)
10
Take time off whenever you feel like it, this isn't a job, and we'll all still be around in if you don't post for a few days.
Heck, I take months off at a time.
Posted by: John at August 14, 2004 07:10 PM (+Ysxp)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
UPDATE
I finally heard an update on
LT A last night. He's improving, and they're probably going to move him home to the hospital at Fort Lewis in the near future. However, he still has a long recovery ahead of him. But at least he is awake and he knows everyone is pulling for him.
Posted by: Sarah at
01:37 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 56 words, total size 1 kb.
1
You said :" People with actual problems called and reminded me that "gaping shrapnel wounds" are more important than "feelings of inadequacy due to insufficient blog material". I don't think I've ever felt like a bigger idiot."
I must say ... It is here that I have checked to see how you and your friend are doing. It is here That I knew more about him than I did from CB's blog.
It is here ... I knew to keep praying for him .
I must say ...there's nothing idiotic about that at all .
I'm a firm believer in the healing power of prayer. I've told others also who are keeping up with Lt.D . I'll be praying for you also . Because it's so hard to hurt for your friend . God Bless you Lt.D ... and his family.
Posted by: MorningSun at August 14, 2004 04:07 AM (gnBnt)
2
I see I posted on the wrong post... I see that makes me the bigger idiot blogger ... hehe
(((( Big hugs ))))
Posted by: MorningSun at August 14, 2004 04:11 AM (gnBnt)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
August 12, 2004
WORSE
I was just trying to find something back on my old Blogspot site.
I had a realization:
I think I was a better blogger back in November than I am now.
Hmmm...that's not good.
Posted by: Sarah at
09:46 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 36 words, total size 1 kb.
1
i hadnt started reading you back in november so i dont know about that, but i think youre awesome right now. thats why i check in every day. the fact that youre so hard on yourself as a blogger is what pushes you to do such good work. : )
Posted by: annika at August 13, 2004 12:41 PM (zAOEU)
2
I also try to check every day. Don't know that you were better than. To be honest I don't actually recall when I first found your blog, or even how I found your blog.
Yet I'm still here, even when I don't have time to read den Beste or Instapundit I come here.
Keep the faith,
Kalroy
Posted by: Kalroy at August 14, 2004 11:49 PM (q1aeu)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
JOKE
A funny
joke, via CavX.
Posted by: Sarah at
07:49 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 7 words, total size 1 kb.
GAME PLAN
Stephen Green's
Game Plan is a good read. I didn't even want to pull a passage out because the whole thing has to be read as one whole. But I gasped when I read this:
We fought at Bull Run, too. And we fought at Kasserine Pass, and Manila, and Bastogne, and Hue, and on Flight 93. We even won at a couple of those places, even though the cause seemed lost.
But we fought.
I've written about both Bastogne and Flight 93 before; both of them give me chills, but it wasn't until I saw them juxtaposed like this that I realized how they're related. In both cases, Americans fought even when they knew the odds were overwhelmingly against them. And they succeeded.
They fought anyway. That's an American value.
Posted by: Sarah at
05:45 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 135 words, total size 1 kb.
FRENCH
Maybe I could use my French in
Tunisia!
Posted by: Sarah at
05:18 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 10 words, total size 1 kb.
1
For even more, check Michael's blog. He had a couple of write-ups during his trip.
Posted by: Mike at August 12, 2004 07:48 AM (MqNKC)
2
Only if you have occasion to surrender over there.
Posted by: Jim at August 12, 2004 11:45 PM (BjDAE)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
FEAR
To be honest, this is what I fear most. I don't even want to think about an
assassination.
Posted by: Sarah at
03:51 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 20 words, total size 1 kb.
ABC
What a
crock: ABC didn't call me either, or they'd have found someone who voted Gore in 2000 and will vote Bush in 2004. It seems a tad ridiculous that they can't find
anyone in that category. Perhaps they're just not looking hard enough and are instead spending their time crafting over-the-top statements that look like fact but are indeed garbage.
Of course, I voted Gore in 2000 because I was woefully uninformed. I knew that I stood by the Republicans in almost all the issues, but I just didn't think that Bush had the experience to be president. I never thought he was stupid; I just thought he was too...simple.
Thank god I was right. That simplisme is now one of his greatest qualities.
MORE TO GROK:
I digested this for a while and decided I have more to say about it.
The last election was while I was in grad school. I'm ashamed to say that I don't think I read a single newspaper or watched a single debate. I honestly think I got my political news from Saturday Night Live. Embarrassing, I know, but I think it's pretty typical. Most young people just vote based on a hunch or on what they think the parties represent, whether it's true or not.
I'm going to write ABC now.
Posted by: Sarah at
02:43 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 222 words, total size 1 kb.
1
You might like
this (you'll need to scroll down...)
"JEEZ, ARE ANY GORE VOTERS PULLING THE LEVER FOR KERRY THIS YEAR? [08/11 01:13 PM]
It appears there are about a hillion jillion billion google and one Gore voters who are voting for Bush this year. How do I know this? Because it appears every last one of them decided to e-mail me in response to this post. Again, folks, itÂ’s great to hear from you, but honestly, IÂ’m not the one who needs to hear from you. ABC News does."
Posted by: Pixy Misa at August 12, 2004 03:50 AM (kOqZ6)
2
Well, it looks like ABC is
eating their words now.
For the record, I'm one of those "elusive" citizens who voted for Gore in 2000 and will be voting for Bush this year. In 2000, I wasn't concerned with a war or defense of US soil; I was concerned with keeping government out of decisions that are proper only to be made by individuals, e.g., abortion, marriage, and scientific research (such as stell-cell research). But, as many others have noted, the issue for 2004 is the war, and who will ensure that Americans are safe. Bush is the obvious answer.
Posted by: Carla at August 12, 2004 11:40 AM (r5M6F)
3
Or....perhaps your world view is represented by the margin of error. That must be because you are so informed.
Posted by: rfidtag at August 12, 2004 09:56 PM (2fTDM)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
PURPLE HEARTS
What started out as a humorous post has turned into a debate about our military wounded. Interested in joining
this comments section?
Posted by: Sarah at
02:14 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 26 words, total size 1 kb.
96kb generated in CPU 0.0254, elapsed 0.1344 seconds.
61 queries taking 0.1175 seconds, 286 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.