August 11, 2004
LT A
More
information about our friend, via my Mama.
Posted by: Sarah at
08:46 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 12 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I hope Lt. A pulls through all right. I'll keep him and his family in my prayers. And you, also. Keep your chin up.
Posted by: oldcontroller at August 11, 2004 04:59 PM (hhiiF)
2
I think this is the blog mentioned in the article.
http://cbftw.blogspot.com/
Posted by: Amy at August 11, 2004 10:51 PM (i3kAW)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
HEARTACHE
If the media knew how much
this hurts, how it's like a knife in the heart of every military family member, would they still do it? It's becoming obvious that no one in the media gives a damn about our servicemembers.
Posted by: Sarah at
02:26 AM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 43 words, total size 1 kb.
1
These photos sicken me. Each photo taken of a militant with weapons or worse,holding up an American soldier's helmut like a trophy, is like a slap in the face to every soldier and his family. How dare the American media be so callous and unAmerican! I'm outraged!!
Posted by: Nancy at August 11, 2004 03:23 AM (+jEfD)
2
They do realize that it hurts, that is exactly why they do it, and it is their intention to spark those feelings in you. It's called gritty, and hard-hitting, etc... etc...
It really spells out the scum that they have become, worse than ambulance chasing lawyers, it has become blood and body seeking reporters.
They biggest question I have, why are those that take these photos not tracked 24/7? Why are they allowed to operate in ways that are meant to incite jihadis, and demoralize the allies, and not treated as an enemy baffles me to the utmost extreme.
Information is a HUGE part of this war, and it is cedeing them that battlefield to not interfere with their operations.
Posted by: John at August 11, 2004 06:18 AM (crTpS)
3
This is the type of press coverage we here at home had during the Vietnam War. The liberal media has always prided itself on the fact that they, through their slanted reporting, were able to influence the outcome of the war in Vietnam by attacking it in their papers and on the TV in the U.S.
They are still at it and for the same reason. They are trying to scare the American people into pulling back from the War on Terror in Iraq and Afghanistan.
The press today at the highest levels is still made up of the anti-war people of the 60's.
This time I hope they don't succeed. Our future as a country and as a people depend on knowing what the truth is and sidelining the fact spinners on the left.
Posted by: susan at August 11, 2004 02:21 PM (ST1ZE)
4
One thing I am very thankful for this time around is that our military stands head and shoulders above the vietnam era. It could prove quite the difference. Vietnam took a decade to unfold, in another 8 years Iraq will not resemble Vietnam in the least.
I'm actually excited about the future.
Posted by: John at August 11, 2004 02:33 PM (+Ysxp)
5
John:
I hope you are right.
What makes you feel so positive about the future in Iraq and the middle east at large?
Posted by: susan at August 11, 2004 02:57 PM (ST1ZE)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
August 10, 2004
RECRUITS
Tanker sent me this article:
Army finds no lack of recruits for infantry
As an aside, my students were cracking up a few weeks ago talking about the Blue to Green Program. Now I'm Army all the way, but that program does make me giggle a bit.
Posted by: Sarah at
05:31 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 49 words, total size 1 kb.
FOUR QUESTIONS
So Kerry would have
gone to war anyway, lack of WMDs and all. Um, huh? Anyway, he lays out four questions he'd like President Bush to answer. In the remaining 15 minutes before I have to leave for work, I am going to try to give the short answers:
Kerry challenged Bush to answer some questions of his own -- why he rushed to war without a plan for the peace, why he used faulty intelligence, why he misled Americans about how he would go to war and why he had not brought other countries to the table.
1) It's my understanding that we really were surprised by the insurgency. OK, mistake. I understand that American intelligence relied too heavily on what Iraqi exiles said would happen. They were wrong. The military has been frank about their shortcomings though. We're trying to fix the problem, but unfortunately we've got the entire world breathing down our necks now. My husband said his unit gets shot at from mosques but they're not allowed to do anything back. That's a problem. Oh, and all that build-up at the UN? That's not a "rush to war".
2) There's a big difference between lying and being wrong. We had some faulty intelligence. So did Clinton. So did Putin. Heck, so did Saddam. We all thought he had WMDs. We were told he tried to buy yellowcake, which for all the hullabaloo turned out to actually be true. Intelligence is not an exact science, and we did the best we could with what we had.
3) "Why he misled Americans about how he would go to war" is an odd question. I've heard it phrased about why we should go to war, but never how. I don't quite understand the accusation here. Heh, maybe he means why Bush said there'd be shock and awe, when really it looked pretty lame from the TV set in my grandma's sewing room...
4) Oh the glorious "other countries" charge. Here's what I'd say to John Kerry:
Look, moron, even someone with a free geocities account appears to be better informed than you. Put down the guitar, shut off your "rap music", and take time to count the countries that support us in Iraq. And count the waving coalition flags on the Rottweiler's blog. Just because your precious France isn't on board doesn't mean we're alone.
I'll fill in links later [done, as of 0945]; I have to go to work. Unlike Kerry, I have to show up more than 30% of the time.
Ba-zing!
MORE TO GROK:
RWN answers the questions too, and says nearly the same stuff I said.
Posted by: Sarah at
03:25 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 442 words, total size 3 kb.
1
Note, Kerry says the he'd have voted for the war regardless. He is not saying that he'd have gone to war regardless. He has said he only voted for the war to lend negotiation powers to the president, not for him to actually go to war. I don't think this sheds any more light on him than there was before.
Posted by: John at August 10, 2004 08:53 AM (crTpS)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
TREE FIDDY
You know, Kerry's starting to remind me of Chef's father. He couldn't talk about anything without
going back to the Loch Ness Monster; Kerry can't talk about anything without
going back to Vietnam. Or Cambodia. Or not Cambodia, as the case may be. Too bad the Democrats are so blinded by their Anyone But Bush campaign or they'd notice that their candidate has severe problems talking about the 21st century. As a candidate, I'd say he's worth about $3.50.
MORE TO GROK:
Hahaha.
Sure, [General Tommy Franks] got three Purple Hearts, but it took him FORTY YEARS TO GET THEM! What's the matter, Tommy Boy? Bashful? Afraid to get in there and kick the ball around a little? That's alright. TRUE men of valor like John Kerry will take up the slack. It only took Iron Guts Kerry four months to get his three Purple Hearts, plus a Bronze Star, and a Silver Star. Do the math: if Kerry had stuck around for 40 years, he'd have 3600 Purple Hearts, and 120 Bronze and Silver Stars. It would take him a solid month to toss that many medals at the Capitol Building.
Go see how many Purple Hearts everyone else has gotten over the years. I imagine my friend will get one for having most of his torso ripped away...hardly seems like the same thing as Kerry's scratch on the arm.
Posted by: Sarah at
03:04 AM
| Comments (14)
| Add Comment
Post contains 232 words, total size 2 kb.
1
I'll make sure and tell my husband his shrapnel wound is not as worthy as someone else's injury.::rollingeyes:: I think that a lot of times that peoiple forget when they insult Kerry's Purple Hearts, you are probably also insulting thousands of soldiers who received wounds that people are now deeming not worthy. If you don't like Kerry, fine, there are plenty of other things to pick him apart about without insulting a bunch of people who went and did the right thing.
Posted by: Jen at August 10, 2004 11:15 PM (n8GLX)
2
I am certainly not saying that people do not deserve Purple Hearts for any injury. However, many believe Kerry's first injury was self-inflicted, and I believe he should've had the integrity to deny a Purple Heart for that. But if he really did get injured bad enough three times in four months that he had to go home, he shouldn't keep acting like he's GI freakin Joe. Lots of people served two full years in Vietnam...or years in POW prisons...and Kerry's little wounds that let him leave are an insult to those people.
When my friend got hit, the Chaplain said that he was cursing and yelling about how stupid it was that he had gotten hit. He wanted back in the fight. Kerry went and signed himself up for a ticket home. Not the same thing.
Posted by: Sarah at August 11, 2004 02:18 AM (eDh8I)
3
I'm at the part in Tommy Franks' book where he gets home from Vietnam. His father is looking over his medals, and comments on his son's three Purple Hearts. Franks says something like "Those are just for the serious wounds, Dad. I'd have a lot more if I reported every little scratch I got."
Sheesh! What an EGO!
Posted by: Liberal Larry at August 11, 2004 05:34 PM (7ldvV)
4
I just can't help but wonder how many people will one day be saying the same thing about our guys. When you question one soldiers, you question them all, I just don't see how you can seperate the two. My husband was wounded several times in one month, it does happen.
Posted by: Jen at August 11, 2004 11:14 PM (n8GLX)
5
Jen, hopefully if you've been reading my site for a while, you know that I would
never belittle your husband's service. What I see as the difference is this: does your husband go around talking about his service all the time, to anyone who will listen? While downrange did he make fake combat videos and interviews to capture the moment of glory? Does he disparage those who haven't served? Did he come home and accuse his brothers of war crimes? I doubt that he does any of this, or you wouldn't be writing. Your husband probably served according to the Army Values (or whatever branch he's in), with integrity and selfless service. I just don't think Kerry did that. And it happened over 30 years ago, at which point he came home and joined the anti-war crowd, yet now he's acting like he stormed Normandy singlehandedly. That's what bugs me about him. Many soldiers are wounded in Iraq -- one of my husband's guys is now deaf in one ear -- but they don't prance around like they wear their medals on their civilian clothes too...
That's my beef. Not that Kerry was awarded Purple Hearts, but that they're present in everything he does today.
Posted by: Sarah at August 12, 2004 02:13 AM (1cbr7)
6
I think what Sarah is trying to point is the pathalogical deception that is apparent when you examine Kerry, his service, his record, and his actions.
To my examining eye, his actions were motivated by ambition, and the truth is malleable to further that ambition. These are not the actions of an honorable man.
Posted by: John at August 12, 2004 02:36 AM (crTpS)
7
When you question one soldiers, you question them all, I just don't see how you can seperate the two.
And I don't see how you can't see how you can seperate the two.
Am I questioning all U.S. presidents when I say that Nixon was a crook?
Posted by: Pixy Misa at August 12, 2004 05:57 AM (+S1Ft)
8
Sarah, you seem very smart and thoughtful, but you sometimes seem to be getting some bad information. For example, John Kerry served in Vietnam from Nov. 1968 to Apr. 1969. A quick math check will reveal that this is longer than four months.
In recent months you've posted links to widely discredited stories concerning an aborted terrorist attempt and John Kerry's staged combat reenactments.
I try to get news from a variety of sources. If Drudge is the only one reporting it, there's a good chance it's bogus.
Posted by: Rigby Maguire at August 12, 2004 12:14 PM (jhAOH)
9
I am not going to comment about the fake videos, because I am still not sure what exactly I think about that.Kerry's bragging (lol jibjab comes to mind) may be over the top, but no more so or less than Bush bragging about his service too. It's election time, those things wil get blown out of proportion by both sides. If my husband chose to brag about his medals (I don't see that happening) then I feel it is his right to. I just worry that this close inspection into who won what and why is one day going to hurt the guys we are supporting right now. It would kill me to see the fine men I know who deserve every small thing they can get, for living through hell, be examined this way. Imagine how painful that would be. I think it's a bigger issue than just Kerry.
and Pixy, that analogy is not even close.
Posted by: Jen at August 12, 2004 01:38 PM (n8GLX)
10
Rigby, according to
John Kerry's own timeline, he arrived in Vietnam 17 Nov and was granted a trip home on 17 Mar. That's exactly four months. He left about a week and a half later, so I guess technically you're right: it was four and a half months.
And how exactly is the story about Kerry's combat videos disputed? Kerry himself admitted making them...and they were used at the DNC. I don't see the problem there.
And I hardly ever read Drudge, only if someone else links to him.
Posted by: Sarah at August 13, 2004 02:43 AM (Oga1Y)
11
Jen,
I don't think you realize that you and Sarah are on the same side. I'm sorry your husband was injured...I appreciate his service to our country. However, Sarah's criticism of Kerry has nothing to do with your husband.
Posted by: Erin at August 13, 2004 02:01 PM (O383z)
12
I suspect that everyone who's worn the uniform has served with the glory hunting medal grabbers. Some of us have even served with real heros. There's a big difference. The men I served with in the Southeast Asian War Games knew the difference as we knew the difference between a wound and a ding.
I didn't serve with Senator Kerry, I wasn't even there in the same year or Branch of Service. I've never met the man personally. All I know is that his subsequent behavior has not been that of an honorable or couragous individual.
Of the various terms we had for someone like him, the one fit for a family setting is Hee-row.
I'm not real fond of a man who'd put himself in for a decoration for the Hee-row-ick act of throwing a grenade into a stash of rice and peppering his own backside with rice grains. That's just me, though.
Posted by: Peter at August 14, 2004 04:17 PM (iMUy+)
13
All of the brouhaha over Kerry in Vietnam, medals, etc. is really only serving one purpose.
It is stopping everyone from examing the more current record of Senator Kerry. The man has 30+ years since Vietnam. That is what he is, that is what defines him. Research what he stands for, that will tell you what kind of president he would be.
Posted by: Pamela at August 19, 2004 05:12 PM (w8c17)
14
Well, you may not like it, kiddies... but Kerry will be the next President. Get used to it!
Posted by: Yoda at September 29, 2004 04:17 AM (05K68)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
GEOGRAPHY
Chrenkoff also digs up more evidence that Americans don't have a
monopoly on dumb, as most of the world would like us to believe.
The other day my German co-worker was talking on the phone with her friend and saying how my other co-worker and I were glued to the computer looking for news about Iraq. "Hrumph," her friend said, "can they even find Iraq on a map?" My co-worker came to our defense and said, "They know their geography of Iraq better than they do of Germany!"
I get so tired of the "Americans can't do geography" junk. Sure, I've met an American who thought that the Ayatollah ruled Liberia, but I've met uninformed people in Europe too. I personally have had to explain where Afghanistan is to a German, and I've also had to teach a Canadian where the Berlin Wall was (she thought Berlin was in Russia). I've even had a fight with a Swede over how many states there are in the US (he kept insisting that we have 51, and the fact that I live there still wouldn't convince him otherwise!)
People all over the world are bad at geography and history, not just us.
MORE TO GROK:
Heh, when I read back over that, it looks like I'm saying Canada is in Europe. I know for a fact it isn't. The Canadian, however, was in Europe when I asked her, "Didn't you watch any TV at all in 1989?"
Posted by: Sarah at
02:03 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 247 words, total size 2 kb.
ADDICTED
Wow. I know that I eat breakfast and dry my hair in front of the computer, but
this is ridiculous...
(Via Chrenkoff's EU Round-Up)
Posted by: Sarah at
01:45 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 26 words, total size 1 kb.
August 09, 2004
INTERVIEW
It seems John Kerry has just as much trouble
remembering his words as his wife does. At least he didn't tell anyone to shove it though:
“John [Edwards] and I are going to put in place the principle, very simple: No young American in uniform should ever be held hostage to America’s dependence on oil in the Middle East.”
Kerry sat down with Stripes afterward to discuss the war, the stresses on the military and changes he would make.
Stripes: You said during your speech that never again would U.S. troops be hostage to a lousy energy policy —
Kerry: What I said is, I didnÂ’t say never again, I said I donÂ’t want them to be hostage.
Stripes: You think thatÂ’s whatÂ’s going on now?
Kerry: No. ThatÂ’s not related directly to the oil Â… and I never suggested that it is.
Read the whole interview; I think Kerry sounds pretty silly, especially when he says his friends vouch for him. And note the Vietnam junk in the last statement.
MORE TO GROK:
Greyhawk's got lots more.
Posted by: Sarah at
11:04 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 179 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Kerry sure has a high opinion of his diplomatic skills:
Stripes: Tommy Franks has said in his new book that we should be in Iraq for three to five years – does that sound like a fair estimate to you?
Kerry: I think that that estimate depends on the success of my diplomacy ... I know the power of my own diplomacy and I believe, and IÂ’m confident to say I can do a better job of bringing people to the table and reducing the burden on American troops. I know I can do it.
(emphasis mine)
What magical words will bring the troops back?
Sarah: "And note the Vietnam junk in the last statement."
Well, at least he didn't use the V-word. Maybe it's finally dawning on him that we get it ... sort of.
Posted by: Amritas at August 09, 2004 11:52 AM (p29W+)
2
Instalanche *grin* Congrats.
Since Kerry tends to say whatever he thinks sounds good at the moment (without regard to anything he has said previously) this does not surprise me in the least.
Posted by: Teresa at August 09, 2004 10:29 PM (nAfYo)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
WORTH IT
Seeing Fahrencrap 9/11 was a complete
waste of time...until today. My German co-worker walked into the office this morning and triumphantly slapped a movie brochure on my desk. "I saw Fahrenheit 9/11 this weekend, and if you saw it there's no way you'd vote for Bush." Thank goodness I could respond, "I have seen the movie, and I most certainly will still be voting for Bush. You're crazy if you think that movie is going to change my mind." Took the wind right out of her sail. "You've seen it? Oh." Boo-yah.
MORE TO GROK:
Heh, check the comments section; my husband cracks me up. As time goes on, I grow more and more amazed that he ever gave me the time of day. I'm the luckiest person in the world.
Posted by: Sarah at
06:39 AM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
Post contains 135 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Sarah - good for you. It's sad that MM is allowed to show that movie as "FACT" when it's mostly distorted facts and half-truths. I'm glad MOST of us know better.
Posted by: Kathleen A at August 09, 2004 08:31 AM (vnAYT)
2
Print this out and slap it on your incredibly gullible boss' desk: http://www.davekopel.org/terror/59Deceits.pdf
Posted by: CavalierX at August 09, 2004 08:52 AM (sA6XT)
3
Yeah, and if you read Protocols of the Elders of Zion there would be no way you could vote for Joe Lieberman. What a crock!
Posted by: Blue 6 at August 09, 2004 10:27 AM (RLIdI)
4
Joe Lieberman is Jewish?
Posted by: Tanker Schreiber at August 09, 2004 12:22 PM (Ke7Fj)
5
Hilarious, Blue 6! Hope to see more of you here!
Posted by: Amritas at August 09, 2004 12:41 PM (p29W+)
6
'Bout time you started checking in, Blue Six! Keep up the good work, and know that this ol' ex squid is 100% backing you up in my thoughts and prayers!
Nuts, Sarah! I guess now I'll have to go ahead and fork over the dough and go watch MM's garbage; of course, I'll do so in Columbia, MO (home of Mizzou, which boasts one of the finest liberal journalism schools on the planet). Might be fun, though. BTW, check out Lt. Smash's latest report. Cool!
Grace and peace,
Jim
Posted by: Jim Shawley at August 09, 2004 01:28 PM (CnYsu)
7
You don't need to pay for the 'privilege', its available free on the net:
http://www.moorelies.com/news/archives/display.cfm?newsID=233
Posted by: Tanker Schreiber at August 09, 2004 06:13 PM (Ke7Fj)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
IF ONLY
Awesome. Excellent. Sweet. Cool. Wow. Wonderful. Kick-ass. And other adjectives that describe Cold Fury's
Someday, Some way. Oh and funny, dead-on, and if-only.
(via Baldilocks)
Posted by: Sarah at
06:11 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 29 words, total size 1 kb.
WE GET IT
I can't praise
Cav X enough...
So... we get it. John Kerry was in Vietnam. What no one can explain is how that alone qualifies him to be President of the United States. No one can explain how spending four months on a patrol boat thirty-five years ago is a better qualification than spending the last three years destroying terrorist training camps, breaking up terror cells in the US and abroad, uncovering a multinational nuclear proliferation ring, forcing belligerent North Korea to the bargaining table, cowing Libya into giving up its WMD programs and terrorist support, and winning two wars against terrorist-supporting Islamofascist dictatorships in the process.
Posted by: Sarah at
03:50 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 113 words, total size 1 kb.
August 08, 2004
WEBCAM
Our boys just got a new computer room on their camp, complete with webcams. I got to see my husband for the first time since our anniversary. He looked great! (I got to see the dimples too.) And he flashed the camera around the room so I could see everyone else there and also what the set-up is like on his camp. It was great. Incidentally, I thought when I looked at him that he looked really dirty. Turns out, according to Red 6, that he's actually just extremely tanned. But only on his head and hands, of course. Ha.
I'm going to buy a webcam of my own this afternoon so he can see me too. I'd better take a shower first...
MORE TO GROK:
Got to see Red 6 today too! Awesome. What a difference seeing someone's smile can make.
Posted by: Sarah at
05:28 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 144 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Sarah - ain't technology great? I have been able to see the soldiers and marines I support through the webcam and it never ceases to amaze me that they are 8k miles away and we can see each other LIVE. Amazing. How wonderful for both of you. Have fun!
Posted by: Kathleen A at August 08, 2004 09:00 AM (vnAYT)
2
This news made my day. You're post "missing" really got to me when I read it and I had to say a little prayer for you. I'm thrilled to hear they got the webcam - and that you'll actually be able to see each other. What relief that must be to just see those dimples.
Good for you!!!
Posted by: Tammi at August 08, 2004 09:57 AM (4Ls5e)
3
Web cams rock. Working so far away from home it is great to see my family that way.
Not anything like being there, but nicer than just the phone or chat.
Kalroy
Posted by: Kalroy at August 08, 2004 02:36 PM (q1aeu)
4
Yay for technology! Videophones are finally here!
Posted by: Pixy Misa at August 09, 2004 01:06 AM (kOqZ6)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
GRAMMAR
Grammar fun with President Bush, found via
Pixy:
"Rarely is the question asked, is our children learning?" Let us analyze that sentence for a moment. If you're a stickler, you probably think the singular verb "is" should have been the plural "are," but if you read it closely, you'll see I'm using the intransitive plural subjunctive tense. So the word "is" are correct.
In my sentences I go where no man has gone before...I am a boon to the English language.
We often hear people make fun of the President for the way he speaks. Even my own students occasionally call him dumb. I remind them that most of them screw their past participles up royally, that they are 20-30 years old but still mixing up there/their/they're, and that anyone whose extemporaneous speech is transcribed word for word is going to make grammar mistakes. The measure of a man is not grammatical accuracy but the message that's being conveyed. I'd much rather hear this
Anybody who wants to harm American troops will be found and brought to justice. There are some that feel like if they attack us that we may decide to leave prematurely. They don't understand what they are talking about if that is the case. Let me finish. There are some who feel like the conditions are such that they can attack us there. My answer is, bring 'em on.
than this
I believe I can fight a more effective, more thoughtful, more strategic, more proactive, more sensitive war on terror that reaches out to other nations and brings them to our side and lives up to American values in history. [emphasis mine]
MORE TO GROK:
The distinction:
In his landmark speech to Congress on September 21, 2001, George Bush told the world "you are either with us or against us". Today John Kerry told them "You are either with us, or against us---but if you're against us we'll be nice to you and hope you become our friend". Which guy would you trust your family's safety with?
MORE:
Hilarious: Kerry said almost the exact same thing that Bush said. Of course, no one suggested he's a halfwit because of it (via Allah).
Posted by: Sarah at
05:18 AM
| Comments (12)
| Add Comment
Post contains 366 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Sarah - you're right. The other day they played a gaffe by the president on EVERY station I saw on TV plus the radio and internet. Yet NO ONE except for bloggers picked up on Kerry's 'more sensitive' war on terror. More sensitive? What the heck does THAT mean? I think President Bush speaks more like a NORMAL person who makes mistakes. At least you know who he is and what he stands for. With JK, it's about who the audience is. He changes from minute to minute. I find it heartening that President Bush laughs at himself. At least he is human with emotion.
Posted by: Kathleen A at August 08, 2004 09:05 AM (vnAYT)
2
“Our enemies are innovative and resourceful, and so are we. They never stop thinking about new ways to harm our country and our people, and neither do we.”
I, for one, believe Our Great Leader.
Posted by: rfidtag at August 08, 2004 03:42 PM (XxIKf)
3
WooHoo Sarah - you are so on target with this. I heard Kerry "mispeak" a word last week (I think it was menator for senator) but did you hear about it in the media nope. I read it on a blog. But of course we all KNOW how useless blogs are ..... according to the media. LOL I'll take President Bush's gaffes any day instead of the waffling, nuanced Kerryspeake of a sensitive war on terror. What in all of stupidity does that mean? NOTHING. And that's what nuanced speak is: NOTHING.
Posted by: Toni at August 08, 2004 10:11 PM (3e3Je)
4
I was highly offended and shocked by the "bring 'em on" remark, since I had a son in the Army just arriving in Iraq at the time Bush said it.
Well, they were listening: and they certainly have brought it on. My son was telling me about the feeling that you get when you wonder whether you're going to wake up with no bottom half if your tent in a FOB gets hit with a mortar or rocket. Or when you see soldiers all messed up by roadside bombs.
Thank God he survived 15 months there unharmed, but I wonder how the families of those who have been killed and wounded feel about "bring 'em on."
Easy to say "bring 'em on" when you didn't even leave Baghdad airport.
Posted by: Five Niner at August 08, 2004 10:59 PM (Y+j+9)
5
Five niner, the purpose of the military is to engage the enemy and protect American citizens. Better to fight the enemy on our terms than to find another smoking hole in NYC.
Posted by: Sarah at August 09, 2004 01:21 AM (OFppu)
6
Ok, and what purpose did saying something stupid like "Bring 'em on" serve?
Hey, check this out, Sarah: there has been no connection shown between Iraq and 9/11. There have been no weapons of mass destruction found. The army is getting wrecked by overextension: my son's unit, after just getting back after 15 months, is scheduled to go back next July. The 173rd Airborne, which just came back in May after a year in Iraq, is going to Afghanistan in January for another year. Almost everyone is getting out of the Army and the Guard as soon as they can.
The author of "Imperial Hubris," an anonymous senior CIA analyst, has said that the incompetantly run Iraq invasion has been a gift to our enemies in al-Qaeda.
Sounds like we're fighting them on their terms.
Posted by: Five Niner at August 09, 2004 02:58 AM (Y+j+9)
7
Ahh...Our Great Leader has yet another pearl of Wisdom. When responding to a question posed by a Native American journalist on what he thought about the sovereignty of the Indian tribes in the U.S., Bush responded with: "sovereignty is well ... sovereignty, and if you have sovereignty you are sovereign."
Sarah...there is and never has been a connection between Iraq and Al Qaeda. The military is not the right tool for this so-called War on Terror. If you lived in NYC you would recognize the we aren't any safer because of Iraq. But you don't, and you are not reasonable.
Posted by: rfidtag at August 09, 2004 07:55 AM (XxIKf)
8
Looks like I made a Bushism. Ooops. At least I can accept responsibility.
Posted by: rfidtag at August 09, 2004 07:56 AM (XxIKf)
9
Jesus, rfidtag, the whole point of this post was how Bush accepts responsibility for his malapropisms. Are you really so blinded by your Bush hatred that you can't see that?
And I'm almost afraid to ask, but if you don't think the military is the right answer, then what is?
Posted by: Sarah at August 09, 2004 09:46 AM (lKeVD)
10
The military is the right answer being wrongly used in the wrong place.
Afghanistan, no problem with that: we should have more troops there, even into Pakistan where most of the al-Qaeda seem to be hiding.
Iraq has been a tremendous diversion from the real war, and even if getting rid of Saddam was good on its own merits, it was incompetantly and corruptly (no-bid contracts to Halliburton) managed by the civilian leadership of the DoD.
Hell, Bush didn't even let the Marines take Fallujah after they shed so much blood and were on the brink of taking the city. It's still a haven for the guys killing our own.
Posted by: Five Niner at August 09, 2004 10:32 AM (Y+j+9)
11
We have a military tradition in my family, but I have advised my other son, and my nephews of military age not to volunteer until and unless Bush, Cheney and the rest of the chickenhawk crew is defeated and the grownups are in charge again, people that would listen to commanders like Gen. Shinseki. I have two stickers on my car "I'm the Proud Parent of A Soldier" and "Veteran for Kerry."
Posted by: Five Niner at August 09, 2004 10:39 AM (Y+j+9)
12
"Well, from the standpoint of the shrine, obviously it is a
sensitive area, and we are very much aware of its
sensitivity."
--Dick Cheney on the Imam Ali shrine in Najaf.
"Now in terms of the balance between running down intelligence and bringing people to justice obviously is -- we need to be very
sensitive on that."
--George W. Bush, at the Unity 2004 conference in Washington.
Emphasis mine.
Posted by: curveball at August 17, 2004 10:07 PM (4M6f+)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
DISENGAGEMENT
This is a must-read analysis of Kerry's intentions in Iraq:
The Disengagement
And -- handful of oddballs I've talked to notwithstanding -- veterans and military families seem to support our current President (via Vodkapundit). I think it means that veterans and families want what's best for all of our servicemembers, and they don't seem to think Kerry's plan is what's best.
ALa71 writes about "adopting" a Soldier. My friends and I were talking about this the other day, about how strange it would be to not know someone downrange and to only know Soldiers who warblog. I said that, with everyone my husband knows, I have to monitor news about Tikrit, Mosul, Baqubah, and Najaf. I know more than enough people down there to keep me busy; it's hard to imagine that half of America doesn't know anyone in Iraq or Afghanistan. (And sometimes the ones who do only vaguely have a sense of "yeah, that one guy from my high school is in the Marines or something.") Around here, everything we do or say or think is somehow attached to the war; it's hard to imagine life otherwise.
Posted by: Sarah at
03:14 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 191 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Personally, I find these people sad and unfortunately I know lots of them. All ages with no true connection to this war. They don't even read the warblogs cause it's just too much work and they are toooooo busy. I'm their only connection and sometimes I may lay it on thick but that's all that keeps this war real to them. It's very sad situation and sometimes it does get to me cause they don't feel a duty as an American to support our troops for all that they do and sacrifice. Think I'd better stop right there. LOL I could go on but I won't. Thanks and keep doing what you do.
Posted by: Toni at August 08, 2004 10:17 PM (3e3Je)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
August 07, 2004
MISSING
I was going to sit down and write another letter to my husband, but I thought I'd write it here instead of on paper...
I've been feeling very sentimental today. Maybe it's because we're a week shy of the six month mark, or maybe it's because LT A's injury has made me feel how precious lives are, but I'm feeling mushy today. I miss him a lot.
I miss his dimples. I miss the way he always adjusts the elastic on his jogging shorts. I miss his exasperated pleas for me to stop talking and go to bed. I miss cutting his hair, even though it turns into a bi-weekly argument. I miss the way he always makes my rum and cokes too strong. I miss when he begs for me to make the entire box of crab rangoon. I miss his encyclopaedic knowledge of history and geography. I miss making him waffles. I miss seeing him sitting in front of the computer trying to get his Arabic pronunciation absolutely perfect. I miss driving him to the motor pool at 0400 only to find he's forgotten his wallet at home. I miss his foul mouth. I miss dancing to the Old 97s while I make dinner. I miss the smell of motor pool and tank on all of his clothes. I miss finding his beret all over the house. I miss when he shyly comes to my work at lunch to ask if I need anything. I miss the way he hugs me tight and kisses my forehead.
We're half-way done.
Posted by: Sarah at
01:25 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 263 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Awwww! Half way is good!
Posted by: Beth at August 07, 2004 02:19 PM (BxNUI)
2
Sarah - I'm sure he misses you the same. Keep your chin up. Half way is better than quarter-way.
Posted by: Kathleen A at August 07, 2004 03:31 PM (vnAYT)
3
Half way is great! So are you the half empty or half full person? We still have 4 months before the BIG deployment. Bummer!
How's your friend? How's his wife?
Posted by: williams family at August 07, 2004 10:55 PM (fy5Dv)
4
Definitely half full in this case; I think the past 6 months has gone by faster than I thought it would.
At this point, LT A should be at Walter Reed and his wife should be there with him. I said I'd give her time to settle in and try to call on Monday or Tuesday for an update...
Posted by: Sarah at August 08, 2004 02:58 AM (1vMCC)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
HEH
What John Kerry
would have done instead of reading
My Pet Goat. Heh.
Posted by: Sarah at
10:43 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 15 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I wonder what the people who endured living in the attacked cities think of President Bush's inaction that day...I guess we shall find out in November.
I did not like living under the rule of Mayor Rudy Giuliani...But at least he showed Leadership on that day.
Posted by: rfidtag at August 07, 2004 07:16 PM (/qocr)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
BOOING
But I thought Fox News was the crazy unbalanced one? At least they're not
booing anyone...
Posted by: Sarah at
03:39 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 18 words, total size 1 kb.
1
But that booing was ... objective. Did you expect the Unity Convention to be silent before the world's worst Europpressor? Suppressing their criticism of color would be Racist (tm).
Posted by: Amritas at August 07, 2004 10:08 AM (L5vLk)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
101kb generated in CPU 0.0241, elapsed 0.115 seconds.
61 queries taking 0.0987 seconds, 289 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.