November 29, 2005
Dang, I just wasted a lot of time playing around with these lists of celebrity Republicans
. The most surprising people? 50 Cent and John Malkovich.
I emailed my friends about 50 Cent and said "Did you know that 50 Cent would've voted for Bush if he weren't a convicted felon?" And then I realized that sentence has a grammatically ambiguous modifier...except for the fact that there's nothing ambiguous about which of them is the felon. So does that make the sentence ambiguous or not?
Man, I wish I was still in touch with my best friend from college; we'd have a blast analyzing that one.
Posted by: Sarah at
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 109 words, total size 1 kb.
come on Sarah, diagram that sentence...
you know that it is ambiguous as written.
C+ for effort.
Posted by: MajMike at November 29, 2005 02:29 PM (zXWkt)
I'm not arguing that it's not *grammatically* ambiguous, but what I'm asking -- from a Descriptive point of view -- is whether *meaning* should count at all for ambiguity.
Posted by: Sarah at November 29, 2005 02:34 PM (3l/e2)
Can we just agree to say that there is no ambiguity about which one has been convicted?
Posted by: Pericles at November 29, 2005 10:00 PM (eKf5G)
I knew what you meant. :-)
Posted by: Erin at November 30, 2005 06:39 AM (AUtEP)
How about, "...had he not been convicted of a felonious crime", or "...had he not been a convicted felon"?
Love your site, Sarah, and wish you and your Captain a great Christmas and New Year.
Posted by: Jim Shawley at November 30, 2005 08:06 PM (bKR1b)
| Add Comment
Comments are disabled.
Post is locked.
43kb generated in CPU 0.05, elapsed 0.2823 seconds.
49 queries taking 0.2537 seconds, 202 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.