July 09, 2005
ANNIKA
I've gotten really lazy about posting lately because I assume you can all find the stuff I want to say on other blogs. I see stuff all the time that I want to point out, but I don't have much to add to the conversation; you'd be better off checking out
Conservative Grapevine every morning instead of my blog. Hawkins has done a great job of compiling links.
I've also gotten lazy about reading blogs, which is why I missed this bait from Annika. I heard about Ulf Hjertstrom and immediately wanted to meet him and shake his hand. A Swede who wanted to take the fight to the enemy...wow.
And in reading Annika again, I remembered what I've been missing for so long. I love reading Annika. I love reading many blogs, but I've pushed it all aside because lately I just don't have the time or energy to get that involved. Bunker's absence drove me from the blogosphere, and at times it feels useless to return. However, I spent a long time catching up with Annika, laughing at this spot-on assessment of Jack Kerouac and nodding at this discussion of chickenhawks. I need to spend some time getting caught up with everyone; hell, I've even started skipping Bleats.
But first I need to get the dog to stop whining every time I take him upstairs.
I've been apathetic lately, about everything. London shook me up though, and I hope it helps me start feeling again, start thinking bigger thoughts than "indeed" when I read others' posts. I feel myself turning into an instapundit, and I don't like it.
I've been thinking about a project that I'd like to start. Bunker wrote so many posts that I indeed-ed, and I have been thinking of going back and revisiting some of the things that I wish I'd said. I'd like to work on that soon.
If the dog cooperates, that is.
Posted by: Sarah at
10:03 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 323 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Hey, everyone needs a break every once in a while. I know I take them. I take breaks from reading, as to posting, well, I've always been spotty at best there.
Keep the faith,
Kalroy
Posted by: Kalroy at July 09, 2005 06:47 PM (9RG5y)
2
Thank you, Sarah! i don't mind losing out to that cute little dog!
Posted by: annika at July 11, 2005 02:53 AM (1jbos)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
July 08, 2005
T-SHIRT
I got an email from Mrs. Sims today. She belongs to a support group for OEF and OIF widows. Apparently most of their correspondence deals with anti-war messages they see and hear, things that would have made their husbands cringe. Mrs. Sims was especially appalled by a
t-shirt she saw and the accompanying message from its creator:
The background of this image is created by the names of about 1,700 U.S. soldiers who died in Iraq between March 21, 2003 and June 13, 2005. The names are in alphabetical order, with half the names on the front, and the other half on the back. The names are small, but easily read without magnification.
I think of this product as both a scathing indictment of George W. Bush and a memorial to the brave young soldiers who gave their lives in Iraq on behalf of their country. Perhaps someday they will get the memorial they deserve in Washington. Until then, this will have to suffice.
This t-shirt is not a monument to soldiers; if it were, the Bush slur would have been left off. You made this t-shirt for selfish reasons, as you admit later. Don't even try to sugarcoat it.
Bush is most famous for lying about the weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. It was this lie that arguably was most responsible for the deaths of hundreds of U.S. soldiers in Iraq, not to mention thousands of innocent Iraqi civilians.
But Bush has lied in many other areas as well, from denying global warming to boasting about an improving economy that is actually on the skids. His lies are legion, and have spawned a cottage industry of books including The Lies of George W. Bush by David Corn and Lies and the Lying Liars who Tell Them by Al Franken.
Blah blah blah. If you want to make an anti-Bush shirt, do it. Just leave the fallen soldiers and their families out of it. Putting their names on your shirt implies that they support the message you're peddling for twenty bucks a pop...
I want to acknowledge that a number of relatives of fallen soldiers have contacted me to express their displeasure (or disgust) with the products I sell that bear the names of their loved ones.
Uh, gee, ya think? I know a few of those names, and I'm disgusted; can you guess how disgusted their wives and mothers and brothers are?
I admit that I did not contact the families of soldiers to get their permission. This would have been a monumental exercise, and would no doubt have proved impractical given the differing opinions among various family members.
It would've been too hard and most of them would've said no, so I just went ahead and did what I want regardless.
Of course, this product is not meant to be a statement on behalf of the families or the fallen soldiers. It is a statement on behalf of those who believe that this war was a tragic and terrible mistake -- and not an innocent mistake.
Ah, there's the selfish reason. You didn't make this t-shirt as a monument to the fallen, as you claimed in the beginning of your justification. You made it to prove your own point, using the names of people who don't agree with you and probably would like to punch you in the face if they ever met you. Hope you feel good about that.
I should also like to point out that many of the soldiers who died in Iraq believed that they were fighting for democracy. Democracy is built in large part on freedom of speech. The First Amendment to the Constitution protects these products, and all such similar examples of free speech.
Why does this remind me of the South Park commercial against Harbucks Coffee? ("It's time to stop large corporations. Prop Ten is about children. Vote yes on Prop Ten or else you hate children. You don't hate children, do you?") If you don't like this shirt, well then you must not believe in democracy and free speech and stuff. Oh, and you're disrespecting your husbands because, naturally, they would've fought to the death for my right to make this t-shirt. Isn't that how the saying goes?
Finally, I would like to express my sincere condolences to all of those who have lost loved ones in this war. No matter what they believed, or which side they were on, those who died will be missed.
Dan R. Frazier
In the end, as disgusted as I feel that Mrs. Sims knows her husband's name is on a shirt that makes her sick, I'm sure that the owners of these shirts will someday be ashamed. When Iraq is on her feet, as Germany and Japan are today, these shirts will have been burned or hidden. I'm confident that history will justify CPT Sims, not Dan Frazier.
Nonetheless, I send my condolences to all of the spouses, parents, and siblings of those whose names appear on this nauseating t-shirt. I know this shirt is not in our name.
Posted by: Sarah at
06:52 AM
| Comments (12)
| Add Comment
Post contains 849 words, total size 5 kb.
1
Sometimes there just isn't any justice, and I am ashamed at what fellow citizens do with a gift that has been handed to them. Others have suffered and paid the bill, so dickweeds like this can prattle on in unimaginable ignorance.
Posted by: Jason at July 08, 2005 10:37 AM (565iX)
2
If Dan Frazier was on fire,I wouldn't waste my spit on him to put the fire out. I'm Sorry Mrs.Sims that there are people in the great USA like Dan Frazier. I get angry and upset about these kind of things.
I want Mrs.Sims to know how grateful I am for her husbands service. I cherish him and all those that gave the ultimate sacrifice. Not a day will pass by for the rest of my life that I won't give thanks to God for them... I am forever grateful and humbled, and honored....
Posted by: 1AD Army Mom at July 08, 2005 06:51 PM (lZ8lX)
3
Using someone's name to sell a product while they're alive can get you sued. When the person is a dead soldier, unfortunately it's just disgusting.
Posted by: annika at July 08, 2005 08:47 PM (YmJn+)
4
The guy is a disgusting slug.
Posted by: Jim - PRS at July 08, 2005 10:15 PM (BjDAE)
5
Great piece. I feel like I need a shower just from reading about this.
Posted by: Tony B at July 09, 2005 02:05 PM (QBrm4)
6
I can't believe anyone in this country can be so ignorant. Don't these damn fools realize we are really at war? That we were atrtacked? Bty the way, there was a court case where the judge awarded judgement because the plaintiff 's lawyer provided suffcient evidence there was a justification for the war in Iraq. I have a verbatum copoy of the news article on my site. Only a small newspaper accounting ever appeared in the newspapers.
Posted by: devildpg6771 at July 10, 2005 09:33 AM (VT3Uv)
7
As a Vietnam vet with some experience I have to ask which do we need more? A constitutional amendment against flag burning or one outlawing the use of the names of Americas heros to undermine the very exsistance to the country the fought and died for?
Posted by: Doug R at July 10, 2005 09:49 AM (M7kiy)
8
It is too simplistic to simply lambast Mr Frazier.
First, President Bush deserves critcism of the decision to go to war in Iraq and the names on the shirt are the folks who have had to pay the price for a short sighted decision that does nothing to advance the cause of the US in teh global war on terror.
Second, the names are a matter of public record. He's well within his rights to use it, and from what you have printed he has not been in any way disrespectful of their memory.That's a basic American freedome that I and many others have served to protect.
The real issue comes down to the expectations that the administration painted for the war and sadly the critics have been proven right, the Bush team blew it. Now they have to deal with the consequences of very wrong headed decision.
9-11 and Iraq are two different events and the linkage of the 2 does no one any good. The wars are different conflicts , yet they exact the same price.
So IMHO this is no big deal. Don't buy the shirt.
Posted by: skippysan at July 10, 2005 10:18 AM (OI//T)
9
Think again, SkippySan. The names do not 'Belong' to anyone but the dead, and their families. It is unspeakably rude and downright degrading to tie the names of those who have made the ultimate sacrifice to a cause that they would not have championed. I am not speaking for them, just saying that since none of us can speak for them, this is wrong.
If this idiot
cared for the well-being of the soldiers and their families, then all proceeds would be donated to charities which benefited the families. Gee, do you think that happened here? *snort* Yeah, didn't think so.
Posted by: Barb at July 10, 2005 05:41 PM (g9qHI)
10
'short sighted decision'
'does nothing to advance'
'critics have been proven right'
'Bush team blew it'
'very wrong headed decision'
'does no one any good'
You seem pretty sure of yourself, Skippy. i think that's sad.
Posted by: annika at July 11, 2005 03:02 AM (1jbos)
11
Yes, that right Skippysan they are within their 'legal' rights.
But haven't you (or they?) ever heard of RESPECT!?
As far as your other comments go. Your ignorance isn't worth my time to bother responding.
Posted by: Charles at July 12, 2005 12:14 PM (u8N2O)
12
When i saw this post i thought "there is no way that someone can be that sick" So i decided to ignore it. Then i saw a couple other posts about it and so i went and checked it out and the answer is "yes, someone can be that sick." What pisses me off the most is that Gavin J. Colburn, who saved my sister and died in the process, his name is on there. Gavin fought and died doing something he believed in. I am so pissed that someone would use his name on a damn t-shirt that makes it look like Gavin died for nothing. God that pisses me off. If anyone buys any of this fucking t-shirts that is just wrong. I hope that the person who made these makes absolutley no money off of them. Why would you put a dead person's name on something that goes against everything that they fought for. Man, i am just sooooooooooooooo pissed off by this. GRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR!
Posted by: April Shah at July 19, 2005 11:07 AM (Gj9e6)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
July 06, 2005
HOMEFRONT
I went to our neighbor's change of command today, where he said something that struck me: he thanked the families for their support during OIF and told his soldiers that they can't understand what it was like to be left behind. I remember I got a taste of this when my husband was home on R&R and CPT Sims was killed. My husband was quite taken aback by everything we wives knew about life insurance and death gratuity. He was surprised that I knew things like how long I would be able to stay in quarters, and he was surprised at the string of phone calls we wives began to send. He said that he had never thought about things from the family end; he had never realized the worrying we did, because he always knew if he and his men were safe.
My job during the deployment was significantly different from his. Mine was nowhere near as hard (though I imagine wives who stayed back with three or four kids might think otherwise), but it was something he couldn't quite grasp. And unless you've lived the homefront lifestyle, you just don't quite know what it's like. Soldiers don't know what the homefront feels like.
(I was mulling over what my neighbor said when I realized we're back to the chickenhawk garbage. I think the two thoughts are related. I don't think you have to live through something to have an opinion on it, though I think it helps to know someone who has gone through it so you can talk about it and learn more. But not everyone can live every experience; the chickenhawk argument is bogus.)
Posted by: Sarah at
12:25 PM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 280 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Okay, that's weird. I think I was reading your Major Patti post when you were reading the Chicken Post at my blog...
Posted by: Blackfive at July 06, 2005 12:33 PM (ynjpR)
2
Better a chickenhawk than a chickens**tchicken.
Someone wrote that if you believed in universal health care but your daughter did not dedicate her life to nursing you were a chickennurse.
Posted by: Walter E. Wallis at July 06, 2005 04:31 PM (xX0fS)
3
Look if your 18 to 32 and you cheerlead this FUBAR mission, and you do not wish to enlist then maybe you should have yourself a nice steaming cup of STFU. I did my 6 years, I can chose to cheerlead or I can choose to criticize, as to Iraq I absolutely believe we do not belong there, and I said so from the get-go. Afghanistan I supported, I felt that was a correct decision. To go get Bin-Laden "dead or alive" as the president said. Iraq other than serving as a retirement home to Abu Nidal had zero to do with sponsoring terror (as said by both the 9-11 comission, and the Senate Intelligence Comittee Report) in the United States. I don't want to hear some specious right wing garbage about "Ansar al-Islam" either, they were operating under the northern no fly zone where Saddam could not project any power to remove them from his nation.
Anyone out there remember what happened to Yugoslavia when Marshall Tito died?? Same story in Iraq after we removed Saddam. The complete lack of understanding of history about this topic just astounds me.
Posted by: Bubba Bo Bob Brain at July 08, 2005 12:08 AM (aHbua)
4
But, Bubba, you did your six years
decades ago...if you're not doing the fighting and dying *right now*, then why does your voice matter more? Just wondering...
Posted by: Sarah at July 08, 2005 03:17 AM (JgjE3)
5
Sarah: somehow I doubt a genetically-altered laboratory mouse would ever meet the minimum requirements for any branch of the US military.
Posted by: Patrick Chester at July 08, 2005 08:51 AM (74cXW)
6
Sarah, I'll tell why my opinion matters more than some 18, or 20 year old yuppie larvae's.
I SERVED, THEY DO NOT WISH TO, seriously I use the term chickenhawk to describe those that are generally 18 to 32, single, and reasonably fit. They cheer for the revenge killing of "all them f--king Aaaaayyy Rabbs", yet they refuse to consider enlisting to help the cause. Let me tell you it sure feels like I wasted 6 years of my life, when I compare where I am vs. some of my highschool classmates. While I was doing my duty as I saw it, those people were establishing their "networks". Ask your husband how he would feel if after his service these same yuppie larvae treat him with the disdain they reserve for the "hired help". Which in fact if Cheney is any example, they will. See they don't really give a rat's ass if we kill 1700, or 17,000 American troops in this "war" as long as they aren't the ones dying. These are the people that you will approve of as long as they say they are conservative and vote republican. Real nice crowd. At least the progressives, and moderates aren't hypocrites about the war.
See while this mal-administration mouths platitudes about "supporting the troops", I have put off paying bills to send supplies to the troops, it has caused financial grief, and while I may think their mission is FUBAR, I think the "ground pounders" (I use that with the utmost respect) are performing very well. It is the senior leadership I think sucks for the most part. For those reasons and many more, are why my opinions matter more than the chickenshit-chickenhawk's, OK?
Posted by: Bubba Bo Bob Brain at July 08, 2005 10:51 PM (aHbua)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
HEH
Our dog is hilarious. He's such a couch potato that when I tried to take him for a walk today, he starting crying and trying to climb up my leg so I would carry him. We barely made it across the street before I gave up on the walk altogether. What a bum!
Posted by: Sarah at
07:44 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 55 words, total size 1 kb.
July 05, 2005
PROMOTION
One time at a military ball, we sat across from a MAJ Hook. My husband leaned over and whispered, "I bet it was a long seven years as CPT Hook." I nearly spit my wine across the table.
Some names and ranks just go together. And some you just get so used to hearing that it feels weird when they change. But a promotion is a wonderful thing, even if we have to learn a new title. So I guess we'll just have to get used to calling the sweetest woman on the planet MAJ Patti now.
Congrats on your promotion, MAJ Patti!
Posted by: Sarah at
05:05 AM
| Comments (16)
| Add Comment
Post contains 105 words, total size 1 kb.
1
You got to love that dry humor.
Posted by: CaliValleyGirl at July 05, 2005 06:41 AM (Zfuiq)
2
Congrats to Maj. Patti!!
Thanks for letting us know Sarah! I often wonder how they are doing! That's just wonderful!
Posted by: Tammi at July 05, 2005 08:31 AM (F4oo1)
3
What great news and I ditto Tammi's comment. Heya to Tim, hope you all doing great.
Posted by: toni at July 05, 2005 12:59 PM (X11Ay)
4
Congratulations to Maj. Patti! Also, Tim, I sure miss your blog, but I'm happy that the two of you are together.
Sarah's Mom
Posted by: Nancy at July 06, 2005 12:22 AM (DljPa)
5
One of my detailer in the Navy was LT Coldiron. When he reported to his first ship, with orders in hand to be the communications officer, the CO said, nope, with a name like that, you're going to Engineering.
When a ship has it's plant shut down, it's in "coldiron" status...usually when pierside (on purpose), but a few times it has been known to happen at the most inopportune moment while underway. Then we just usally said the ship "dropped the load."
Another one of those names that just had to be a job....Larry generally was always in Engineering during his sea tours.
Posted by: Curt at July 06, 2005 10:40 AM (B+3DL)
6
One of my detailers in the Navy was LT Coldiron. When he reported to his first ship, with orders in hand to be the communications officer, the CO said, nope, with a name like that, you're going to Engineering.
When a ship has it's plant shut down, it's in "coldiron" status...usually when pierside (on purpose), but a few times it has been known to happen at the most inopportune moment while underway. Then we just usally said the ship "dropped the load."
Another one of those names that just had to be a job....Larry generally was always in Engineering during his sea tours.
Posted by: Curt at July 06, 2005 11:16 AM (B+3DL)
7
Years ago I had a shipmate named Randy Pinson. His wife kept urging him to get a commission. Nope, my friend would say, "No way am I ever going to be 'Ensign Pinson'".
Posted by: 74 at July 06, 2005 01:00 PM (BiZQo)
8
I used to know a Lieutenant Major. It was so glaringly obvious what he would be called as he was promoted that it didn't even really merit comment. I remember hoping at the time that he would one day become Major General Major.
Posted by: Tony B at July 06, 2005 01:56 PM (QBrm4)
9
I once saw a CPT Marvel in line at a Post Bank in Germany... It took all of my will not to laugh in his face (I was a mere E-4)... He saw my smile and seemed to have a good sense of humor about it.
Posted by: Stu Clark at July 06, 2005 03:18 PM (qB6yb)
10
What's in a name?
Then there was US Army LT Manteufell who ruined a hectare of kartofel with his tanks in West Germany during Reforger.
The old farmer came out to bitch LT Manteufell out. In the middle of his screaming at the young LT, the farmer saw his nametag.
The old man's eyes bugged out and he looked the LT over closely. He then came to attention and saluted the LT.
The PLT got a fresh hot dinner as well.
Posted by: red river at July 06, 2005 04:56 PM (wiIi5)
11
Congratulations, Major! I'd probably never have started blogging if I hadn't needed a Blogger account to wish you a non-anonymous "Welcome home." I'm glad to hear things are still going well for you.
Posted by: Bill Faith at July 06, 2005 06:57 PM (5vspZ)
12
When I was serving at the AF Military Personnel
Center, one of the Assigments Officers (same as navy detailer) had a slot to fill in Saudi Arabia.
He had 5 roughly equivalent candidates so naturally he selected Captain Lawrence.
Posted by: Possum at July 06, 2005 11:09 PM (ywZa8)
13
At our local post there is a Maj Frank Burns - he says he gets a LOT of ribbing for that
Posted by: kc2ixe at July 07, 2005 08:39 AM (NHwJK)
14
In my days with the 3rd ACR, I served with a John Hancock, a SGT Pepper, and a SGT Slaughter.
Posted by: Guido at July 07, 2005 01:18 PM (d5glM)
15
Captain Marvel wasn't the only superhero in the Army... I also knew of a Captain Justice.
One friend of mine, an X-ray tech, told me of one instance where he was calling the next person in line, a Sergeant (E-5) Major. At the same time, there was a Sergeant Major (E-9) waiting his turn. Not sure how much was embellishment, but my friend describing it made it sound reminiscent of "Who's on First".
Posted by: malclave at July 07, 2005 04:47 PM (KKTFV)
16
When I was CO of B Troop, 2/10 Cavalry in the 7ID at Camp Kaiser, Korea (1968-70), one of my young buck (E5)sergeant's last name was Major.
Posted by: Piper17 at July 08, 2005 10:58 AM (T0pP2)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
July 04, 2005
F YEAH
I forgot what I had written last year, so I checked:
last year's Independence Day post was hard for me too. It's like I want to say something profound, but every day is 4th of July when you love your country as much as I do. However, we did celebrate in a significant way: by watching
"A Taste of Freedom" and
Team America. Twice. And next year, we'll be celebrating Independence Day in our own country. I can't wait.
Posted by: Sarah at
06:27 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 83 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I just read your 4th of July post from last year...and your essay from MS 100 is spot on. Nothing like spending time in another country to develop a greater appreciation for what we have in America. Hee hee...and I love how you somehow got suckered into getting the full on MRS degree in military sciences.
Posted by: CaliValleyGirl at July 05, 2005 06:52 AM (Zfuiq)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
July 02, 2005
RETRACTION
Stars and Stripes issues a
forthright retraction of incorrect data. The mainstream media should take notice of what a real retraction looks like. Stars and Stripes looks classier every day.
Posted by: Sarah at
01:43 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 32 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Happy Indpendence Day! My thanks to you for your service and sacrifices. It is because of our military that I am able to celebrate the 4th in freedom and I honor you. Those who would deny the bravery and rightness of our military undoutedly add to the problem of deserters. The retraction was very clear as to how and why as well as giving the accurate info. There are millions at home who support our military--I am just one among many.
Posted by: Pat in NC at July 04, 2005 11:08 AM (b98AN)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
ABUSE
Look at all the
abuse going on at Gitmo! Abuse against the soldiers, that is. And look at the punishments solders get for fighting back against the prisoners: demotion, garnished wages, extra duty, etc. What a gulag...
Posted by: Sarah at
01:33 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 39 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I want prisoners punished for any act against a guard, and I want any commander who punishes a guard for physically responding to a prisoner attack removed from authority over troops. The guards are not butlers. The prisoners are not guests. The commander is not an innkeeper.
Posted by: Walter E. Wallis at July 04, 2005 03:45 PM (xX0fS)
Posted by: Mr. Silly at July 05, 2005 03:02 AM (y1TbU)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
July 01, 2005
1890
Here's a Reuters article that really chaps my hide,
via LGF:
WorldÂ’s oldest person celebrates 115th birthday
AMSTERDAM (Reuters) - A Dutch woman who swears by a daily helping of herring for a healthy life celebrated her 115th birthday on Wednesday as the oldest living person on record.
Hendrikje van Andel-Schipper, a former needlework teacher, was born in 1890, the year Sioux Indians were massacred by the U.S. military at the Battle of Wounded Knee.
WHAT??? I supposed they're trying to give us some sort of frame of reference for just how old she is, but let's look at what else happened in 1890, events Reuters skipped in order to use Wounded Knee:
Oscar Wilde publishes The Picture of Dorian Gray
Otto von Bismarck dismissed
Idaho is admitted as the 43rd state
Sequoia National Park and Yosemite National Park established
US stops minting $1 & $3 gold coin & 3¢ piece
Daughters of the American Revolution founded
Ellis Island opens as a US immigration depot
And the list goes on. Heck, Reuters could've said that this woman was born the year before basketball was invented! All of these give us a frame of reference as well; why Wounded Knee?
Posted by: Sarah at
04:47 AM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
Post contains 201 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Quibble: Is Reuters based in America? I thought it was from the UK...
Posted by: Patrick Chester at July 01, 2005 06:25 AM (74cXW)
2
You're right...I fouled that one up.
Posted by: Sarah at July 01, 2005 07:29 AM (owUK9)
3
Or even: The year the Sioux Indians lost the Battle of Wounded Knee.
Posted by: David Boxenhorn at July 01, 2005 12:26 PM (RNs/2)
4
1890 Dutch continue illegal enslavement of Indonesia.
Posted by: Greg Schreiber at July 01, 2005 12:55 PM (DvSQS)
5
SARAH. Please! It is written in the great
secret code book given to every European
upon their 18th birthday:
(ahem) Thou shalt not pass up any opportunity
to make point out the flaws and folibles of
America and Americans. Even when it is neither
germain nor relevant to the topic at hand.
We have yet to break the spirit of the United
States,but that is the mission. In spite of
their goodness,decency and incredible generosity,
they must not be allowed to think that they are
'all that and a bag of chippes' .
Posted by: Mary at July 01, 2005 04:33 PM (YwdKL)
6
Amazing isn't it... not only is she not Sioux, she's not Native American, or even plain old American!!! Was NOTHING happening in the Netherlands the year she was born?
It boggles the mind how much Reuters hates America!
Posted by: Teresa at July 01, 2005 06:35 PM (nAfYo)
7
1890 - The year the ten-year-old Wilhelmina became Queen of the Netherlands, which she remained until 1948. Also the year Luxembourg seceded from the Netherlands.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at July 04, 2005 03:49 AM (RbYVY)
8
My God! That's more interesting and important
to them than Wounded Knee! Put that into
perspective- this woman was born when Whilhelmina
ascended the throne and BENJAMIN HARRISON was the
president.
Posted by: Mary at July 05, 2005 06:29 PM (YwdKL)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
84kb generated in CPU 0.1138, elapsed 0.1952 seconds.
56 queries taking 0.1801 seconds, 262 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.