July 30, 2009
AL GORE'S BIGGEST FAN
An inventive counterpoint to anthropogenic global warming (via Amritas):
I think it would be hilarious to hear that brought up in a global warming debate.
Comments are disabled.
Post is locked.
In a way I am happy to accept AGW as real, because if you do then it becomes highly illogical to
-send tonnes of food to low carbon footprint 3rd world countries leading to a population boom (Daniel Quinn has written some good stuff on this - more food, more people);
-then subsequently invite them to high carbon footprint countries (my country having the highest immigration rate in the world).
This provides a handy excuse to call for a stop foreign "aid", and to stop immigration, while retaining moral highground versus the left. If they really cared about AGW and really believed it to be the greatest threat to humanity, they would stop feeding "surplus" carbon producing humans, and also stop transferring them from low carbon footprint societies to high carbon footprint societies.
It's a fun argument to make against AGW freaks; public policies must mesh together; in my country's case we committed to reducing total carbon emissions to 6% (I think) under the Kyoto accord while simultaneously increasing our population through immigration by about 7% during the implementation phase. You can have the world's highest immigration rate while also fueling a population explosion in the third world, or you can fight AGW, but you can't do both, not at the same time. Public policy debates with leftists rarely present such easy rebuttals to what is so dear to them.
Hey, if AGW gets us off the hook from foreign aid and gets us zero immigration, I'll be Al Gore's biggest fan, but for some reason I'm quite certain that's not their end game.
-send tonnes of food to low carbon footprint 3rd world countries leading to a population boom (Daniel Quinn has written some good stuff on this - more food, more people);
-then subsequently invite them to high carbon footprint countries (my country having the highest immigration rate in the world).
This provides a handy excuse to call for a stop foreign "aid", and to stop immigration, while retaining moral highground versus the left. If they really cared about AGW and really believed it to be the greatest threat to humanity, they would stop feeding "surplus" carbon producing humans, and also stop transferring them from low carbon footprint societies to high carbon footprint societies.
It's a fun argument to make against AGW freaks; public policies must mesh together; in my country's case we committed to reducing total carbon emissions to 6% (I think) under the Kyoto accord while simultaneously increasing our population through immigration by about 7% during the implementation phase. You can have the world's highest immigration rate while also fueling a population explosion in the third world, or you can fight AGW, but you can't do both, not at the same time. Public policy debates with leftists rarely present such easy rebuttals to what is so dear to them.
Hey, if AGW gets us off the hook from foreign aid and gets us zero immigration, I'll be Al Gore's biggest fan, but for some reason I'm quite certain that's not their end game.
I think it would be hilarious to hear that brought up in a global warming debate.
Posted by: Sarah at
07:44 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 293 words, total size 2 kb.
1
A logical liberal argument - unnecessary. As long as it makes you feel good in that "WAY TO GO!!!!" kind of way (thank you South Park). The lefties just want more control.
Good post.
Good post.
Posted by: Patrick at August 01, 2009 08:12 AM (/iKMZ)
2
That is really brilliant... there are just SO MANY complications to trying to make EVERYTHING turn out "right" in life, aren't there? ;-)
Posted by: Krista at August 01, 2009 02:10 PM (sUTgZ)
44kb generated in CPU 0.0104, elapsed 0.0967 seconds.
49 queries taking 0.0894 seconds, 199 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
49 queries taking 0.0894 seconds, 199 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
