December 04, 2008
CONTENT
I used to be bothered that my friends are not from my Real Life. I used to think there was something wrong with me. I used to feel that something was missing.
But this day was a tipping point. Since then, I have felt the Importance Scale tip from real life to imaginary.
And some days I am just overwhelmed by how happy I am.
How much I love you all.
Today is one such day.
Tomorrow night we have an FRG meeting. I don't know anyone in my FRG. I don't even know where my husband's company is located; I had to ask him via chat how to get there.
My real life is the illusion, and you are my world.
I live in a gulch in my mind and I am surrounded by the most wonderful people.
I don't think it's possible for anyone to feel more blessed than I do right now.
Posted by: Sarah at
01:06 PM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 157 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I know what you mean, and am very grateful for all my blog friends, but it sure is nice to sit and chat face to face sometimes.
Posted by: Beth at December 04, 2008 01:12 PM (qkeSl)
2
I, too, know what you mean. It is nice to sit face to face and it's even better when it's face to face with an e-pal or bloggy buddy.
Blessings are bestowed us from many places and my bloggy buddies are no less than a blessing. You all get me in ways that real-life people can't even begin to think about.
Happy Thursday!
Posted by: Susan at December 04, 2008 01:33 PM (kOpTG)
3
I used to think there was something wrong with me.
There was never anything wrong with you. Sometimes
you align with those nearby; sometimes you don't. Physical proximity has nothing to do with common ground.
When your husband returns, the scale will tip the other way again. Real life will become capital-R Real.
But we won't become illusions. We will remain real. And we will always be here for you.
Posted by: Amritas at December 04, 2008 06:16 PM (zc9j7)
4
OK by the time we are like 80, they will have those star trekky teleporter thingys.
Then you can teach me to knit...
Finding friends that truly fit your heart that is HUGE, and you are part of that for me.
I feel so sorry for people who have friends like "the neighbor, I do not really like", or the lady from work, that someone is nice to at work, and than goes home to talk about the wierd person....
that is an empty place.
If you think about what the train did for America...I think the internet is to friendship to me...
Posted by: awtm at December 04, 2008 07:47 PM (EzXYD)
5
I am pleased to be your friend, however distant that I be.
Posted by: deskmerc at December 04, 2008 08:26 PM (pYOXQ)
6

See, if you were in my real life I'd be wondering if this were directed toward me and what your motive for saying it is. BUT, because I know that our friendship is genuine, I know this is at least partly aimed in my direction & that you know I feel the same.
Now, if I'm delusional and you were talking about everyone BUT me, don't post it...and I'll never know. LOL
Posted by: Guard Wife at December 05, 2008 03:49 AM (N3nNT)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
FOAM PURGATORY, NOT AS BAD AS FOAM HELL
Dear Mare,
Today at work I had to put together the small version of the foam gingerbread house. It is not nearly as maddening, so if you are looking to buy one of these for torture purposes, I suggest splurging on the big one.
Well, the little one isn't as bad...provided it actually comes with all its pieces. Which mine did not.
Sigh.
I did take a photo of the masterpiece I put together the other day. Behold, in all its glory:

I also forgot to mention the other day that all I had to go on was a 2"x2" black and white photo of the thing. Hardly good instructions.
Each heart? Individually applied. I know I mentioned that. It's worth repeating.
Do not attempt this at home, kids.
Posted by: Sarah at
11:19 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 145 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Oh. My. WORD. That's beautiful! You are to be commended for your excellent craftiness and skill! :-) (And no, I won't attempt it at home, LOL!)
Posted by: kannie at December 04, 2008 12:42 PM (iT8dn)
2
Holy hearts! Great job.
Posted by: Susan at December 04, 2008 01:35 PM (kOpTG)
3
OMG! I want to get her the Valentine one. It's pink and princessy and my SIL will have to help her apply Each. Heart. Individually!!!!
I'll see if I can get my brother to video tape the process. We can put it on YouTube under the catergory "Head Explosions"
Serioulsy, you did a great job with that. I have button pictures for you.
Posted by: Mare at December 04, 2008 02:09 PM (APbbU)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
HEART LOVE
Wow.
What Girls Want: A series of vampire novels illuminates the complexities of female adolescent desire
This almost makes me want to read Twilight. Almost.
It also makes me realize why I can't: I am no longer thirteen.
I have been thinking about being thirteen a lot lately.
I have been thinking about sitting on the sofa with a boy watching Pink Floyd's The Wall and thinking that after the movie was over, I would tell him I love him. And I did. And he smiled.
Three years later, he was dead. And I replay that night in my head, the delicious memory of feeling so grown-up and alive.
And that love, that love I felt for those illustrious three, it is nothing like the love I have for my husband. It was impetuous and consuming. It spawned poetry and diary entries. That was love with my heart. I am glad I experienced it; I am also glad I don't experience it any longer. It is an exhausting love.
But I have been thinking about it a lot lately and feeling nostalgic. That article gave me some insight into why.
And now I understand the Twilight craze.
Posted by: Sarah at
10:32 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 201 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I read all four Twilight books and saw the movie. You've met my #2 kid - I'm sure you can figure out why there was an interest in those in my house!
I pretend the series stopped at book 3, and the movie is over 2 hours of horrific teen angst I'll never get back. Edward's (the main vampire character) eyebrows are truly so horrific and distracting that I couldn't so much as eat popcorn.
Anyway, with all honesty I can say that lately teen fiction has been more interesting and refreshing than adult fiction has been. I have to read the stuff before my kids do (yes, I have set some books off limits until they are older) - and although the words in some of the books are smaller and don't use as many words from the SAT list, the plots are truly entertaining and unique on some of them. SOME of them.
Sarah, I can seriously say you'd probably really like the Lemony Snicket books. Even AFG - reader of nothing but books about war and weapons and fighting of some sort - liked the Lemony Snicket books.
Posted by: airforcewife at December 04, 2008 03:58 PM (Fb2PC)
2
I dunno - I might prefer the pre-teen angst to the overdone s-e-x in the adult vampire stories (think Anita Blake novels). And reading to determine if a book was appropriate for my nephew led me to absorb the whole Harry Potter series with relish.
However, I have no desire to ever read another bodice-ripping Harlequin type romance. Is that weird?
Posted by: Barb at December 04, 2008 04:32 PM (p+dnl)
3
You don't have to be thirteen to read Twilight.

I agree with the above comment though- I also pretend that book 3 is the end of the series, lol.
Posted by: Kasey at December 12, 2008 08:25 AM (tttDj)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
December 03, 2008
PRETTY HAPPY AT THE MOMENT
So far today, two people have said that they're worried about me and my general level of
usch. I didn't realize I was that transparent. I have been feeling the weight of the world on my shoulders lately.
So I shrugged.
Tonight I swung through BK for a #12, I rummed up my Coke, and I'm sitting down to watch 300 and work on my awesome top-secret knitting project.
Seriously, how could I be in a bad mood with that lineup?
Posted by: Sarah at
01:43 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 91 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I finally saw that a few nights ago for the first time. I think people hyped it up too much for me; it was enjoyable, but not in the earth-shattering manner that had been suggested by other reviews.
On the other hand, I used to really dig stuff like that. I'm not sure what has changed.
Sig
Posted by: Sig at December 03, 2008 05:27 PM (WDHPm)
2
Man, junk food, liquor and Sparta war mongering, thatÂ’s living right there. IÂ’d say anyone who engages in that seems fine to me.
Posted by: tim at December 04, 2008 04:30 AM (nno0f)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
LINK
I intended to link to this last week but just didn't. My brain came back to it today. I think it's worth reading and thinking about:
Black Friday and Love
Posted by: Sarah at
07:23 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 32 words, total size 1 kb.
1
That was an eye-opening read. Thanks.
I once actually saw two women quarrel over an item, just like in the movies, while Christmas shopping.
Until today, I would have written off this behavior as mindless consumerism. An appalling act can have multiple possible motives, and some may not be as bad as others.
Posted by: Amritas at December 03, 2008 02:11 PM (zc9j7)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
December 02, 2008
HELL MADE OF FOAM
Dear AWTM,
I would like to apologize for the present I gave you last Christmas. I had no idea.
You see, I loved the story of Pink Ninja wanting an activity set. It's one of my favorite kid stories ever. So when I found the foam nativity kits that you can build yourself, I thought it was perfect: it was both an activity and a nativity set!
I had never put together one of those kits before.
As I mentioned, I received all the Michaels store decorations for Valentine's Day already. Inclosed were several of those foam kits for pink gingerbread-style houses covered in hearts. It's my job to put them together for the store display.
I spent two hours on that house today. I am 31 years old.
The base of the thing was 10"x15". The house was a two-story castle with a turret and a covered porch. Covered in hearts. Which you have to individually attach.
Every time I tried to touch the roof, it fell off. And then the ceiling caved in.
You see in this picture of the little gingerbread house, you see how the seams don't exactly match up? Now try building a second story on top of that. And adding a roof with seams that don't match. I was ready to shoot myself.
And it seems I'm not the only one who's been in foam hell this week.
Two hours and a glue gun later, the Valentine's house is presentable. Provided no one goes near it, breathes on it, or even looks at it too piercingly.
And I still have three more kits to make.
So, AWTM, I am sorry if your activity set turned into an activity that made you want to kill me.
UPDATE:
With photo!
Posted by: Sarah at
10:16 AM
| Comments (9)
| Add Comment
Post contains 302 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Ha, first off, I cheated and used tape. Integrity, nope, not me, I used tape.
It was more frustrating for SR who is a DIRECTIONS kind of kid....
I think making the little people was the nightmare...
PN has her "activity set" from us out, I make her put it away at Christmas, and she protests heavily.
You will find when you have children, all sorts of simple activities turn into hell fast. Things like taking a simple toy out of a box, that some Sri Lanken or Chinese child has put twist ties on the entire thing....
no sweat...
It was the sweetest thought EVER.
Posted by: AWTM at December 02, 2008 10:57 AM (YTCu5)
2
Oh my gosh! ThatÂ’s the gingerbread project they were out of at my Michaels. And after reading your post, IÂ’m oh so glad they were!
I tried to sell the guys on the nativity scene, too, but it was a non-starter. Same with the snowman/Christmas tree set.
I canÂ’t even imagine having to put together a Foamie that people outside the family would actually see. Two years at it and I still havenÂ’t mastered Foamie building. Something tells me I never will!
Posted by: 9to5to9 at December 02, 2008 12:06 PM (LIfxS)
3
When I went to Michaels (alas, not yours) on Sunday, I saw similar kits and thought, no way I could make one. I'm now looking at
this page and thinking, you guys got any level 0 projects?
Lego is more my style, though I admit modern sets look too easy.
AWTM wrote:
You will find when you have children, all sorts of simple activities turn into hell fast.
At a party last Christmas, I found myself building and rebuilding a railroad set for a rambunctious kid. I was 36, and I wasn't getting better with practice.
Things like taking a simple toy out of a box, that some Sri Lanken or Chinese child has put twist ties on the entire thing....
So I'm not the only one who hates that. It's
work to take those things out. Wasn't like that when I was growing up. I've assumed it's an anti-shoplifting measure. Is it?
Yesterday I was looking at some robot action figures on my bookshelf and wondering if I should put them back into their boxes. There's no way I'd twist tie them. A shame, because I did keep all the ties, even though I'll never use them again.
Posted by: Amritas at December 02, 2008 12:35 PM (+nV09)
4
Sarah,
It's my job to put them together for the store display.
I used to look at Lego sets or Transformers on display and notice errors: a car stuck halfway to robothood, etc.
Your story has taught me to be less judgmental.
I probably couldn't do any better with today's toys. I don't know about modern Lego, but I've had trouble transforming modern Transformers. That's another reason I don't want my bots back in their boxes. The twist ties were just the beginning ...
Posted by: Amritas at December 02, 2008 12:51 PM (+nV09)
5
Oh my gosh - I was laughing so loud! Now you understand why I cringe whenever my friends give the kids "projects."
Posted by: She of the Sea at December 02, 2008 03:40 PM (RoRp+)
6
That was hilarious. I give my neice and nephew loud/complicated/messy toys just to annoy my sister in law. Like the color your own umbrella kit with the permanent markers.

Why, yes, that is the sound of me going straight to hell.
I have to find one of these foamie projects.
Posted by: Mare at December 03, 2008 04:05 AM (APbbU)
7
sarah - i am laughing so hard. And laughing even harder at mare who is heading to michaels to stock up!!!
Posted by: keri at December 03, 2008 05:01 AM (HXpRG)
8
Sarah? I used to work for the company that designed those and, at least 2 years ago, those were our sets you're talking about.
Hell. They are hell. Torture. Pure and simple. Nativity sets should be blessed. I told the designers and my boss they were EVIL for even putting them on the market.
And, you're crafty. Imagine me, someone with NO SKILLS tryin' to do those. I bought one for a 4 year old so we could do it together. Yeah, he took it away from me. Told me he's better off doin' it alone. He was right.
There is a reason I'm called the Anti Craft.
Good luck.
Posted by: Tammi at December 03, 2008 05:24 AM (pWX3U)
9
A whole lot of 'splainin' going on. So funny.
I made a village for my kids out of posterboard, about 40 years ago. It went real well and lasted for years.
Foamies... I dunno. ;-)
Posted by: Ruth H at December 03, 2008 12:29 PM (Y4oAO)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
FAIL
Lie, Cheat and Steal: High School Ethics Surveyed
In the past year, 30 percent of U.S. high school students have stolen from a store and 64 percent have cheated on a test, according to a new, large-scale survey suggesting that Americans are too apathetic about ethical standards.
Let the record show that I have never shoplifted or cheated on a test.
Educators reacting to the findings questioned any suggestion that today's young people are less honest than previous generations, but several agreed that intensified pressures are prompting many students to cut corners.
"The competition is greater, the pressures on kids have increased dramatically," said Mel Riddle of the National Association of Secondary School Principals. "They have opportunities their predecessors didn't have (to cheat). The temptation is greater."
Even back in my day, we had graphing calculators that stored information in them. I don't remember any of my friends using that storage to cheat. But regardless, this person is gonna argue that greater competition and opportunity is an excuse for cheating?
Despite such responses, 93 percent of the students said they were satisfied with their personal ethics and character, and 77 percent affirmed that "when it comes to doing what is right, I am better than most people I know."
Sick. That's the result of parents and their unconditional love and praise. Heaven forbid you hurt little Johnny's self-esteem by telling him he needs to "live and act within the limit of your knowledge and keep expanding it to the limit of your life."
"A lot of people like to blame society's problems on young people, without recognizing that young people aren't making the decisions about what's happening in society," said Dzurinko, 32. "They're very easy to scapegoat."
FAIL. Young people will be making those decisions in ten years, and they have a foundation of cheating and stealing to build on. They're not scapegoats if they admit their immoral behavior. We are totally boned when they become businessmen, educators, and politicians.
"This generation is leading incredibly busy lives -- involved in athletics, clubs, so many with part-time jobs, and -- for seniors -- an incredibly demanding and anxiety-producing college search," he offered as an explanation.
FAIL. Getting into college is stressful, so I'm gonna go out and shoplift, you know, to take the edge off.
I find it incredible that all these principals and administrators are making excuses for these results. Actually, no, I don't find it incredible: I think it's the reason they came up with these results. Adults coddle kids entirely too much these days. They want kids to like them. You know what my philosophy is? Your teenager should hate you...until he's about 25. Then he should start to grok everything you did for him. I am still realizing all the lessons my parents taught me, and I try to inform them when I have finally understood why they did the things they did. And I'm glad they didn't try to "be my friend" when I was in high school. Shoot, my mother doesn't even try to be my friend today; she still lets me know when she thinks I have acted wrong.
"We have to create situations where it's easy for kids to do the right things," he added. "We need to create classrooms where learning takes on more importance than having the right answer."
Weeping Jesus on the cross: FAIL.
There is nothing more important in school than having the right answer. I can't think of any other response to that last quote that doesn't involve cuss words. And you don't create situations for people to do the right thing; you teach young people the right thing to do and then expect them to do it, even when it's hard. That's what morals and values are for!
I don't have any kids yet, much less teenagers. But I have thought about it constantly for the past two years, and I have closely observed the parents around me, looking for what works and what doesn't. And you know how I said I love my husband with my brain instead of my heart? I will love my children the same way. I don't believe in unconditional live; I believe love is earned through thoughts and actions. And I vow that I will never watch my child become a shoplifter and a cheat and then make the kinds of excuses found in this article.
I have a friend who recently said, "Normally when a childless person talks about what she'll do when she has kids, I roll my eyes and think 'just you wait.' But with you, I actually think you will do all these things you say you'll do."
I considered that an enormous compliment.
Posted by: Sarah at
05:25 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 789 words, total size 5 kb.
1
I saw the figures
yesterday at Joanne Jacobs and dreaded to read the details.
I don't think it's just about parenting. Contemporary American culture is about ends, not means. How you get from point A to B -
"phase 2" - doesn't matter. Cheating? Lies? "Equalizing" laws? "Everybody" does it, right?
But you never did.
Some may think your nobility is misguided, even pointless. They may mock it.
Why?
Have you ever noticed the way people speak of members of strict religious sects, such as the Amish or the Mormons? There is a tone of amusement, of making fun of their unusual beliefs or outlandish customs. But mixed with it there is a hesitant admiration, a grudging respect for those who have chosen to hold themselves to a strict moral standard--those who not only have something to believe, but who act in accord with their beliefs.
- Ron Merrill
I heard that some people rejected Romney in the primaries because he was "too perfect." Pathetic coming from Republicans who pride themselves on being "superior" to Democrats. I am not a Romney supporter - I endorsed no candidate - but rejection of Romney on such grounds still angers me.
Some people cannot stand the good because it reminds them of the evil in themselves.
Kill by laughter ... Learn to use it as a weapon of destruction. Turn it into a sneer ... Don't let anything remain sacred in a man's soul - and his soul won't be sacred to him. Kill reverence and you've killed the hero in man.
- Ellsworth Toohey in
The Fountainhead
Posted by: Amritas at December 02, 2008 08:57 AM (+nV09)
2
Amritas, I'm right there with you - there are efforts on every side to mock the good and discredit it - whether in families or public figures - as "isolated" or "ignorant" or "impractical." And I feel that part of the reason for the success of those efforts is (yet another "i"?) intimidation. Political correctness makes it difficult to discuss values and morals without painting a great big target on your forehead for some variety of "hatemonger" accusation.
Our Founders were very clear, though, that the success of our form of government was (I'd say "completely") dependent on individual virtue and moral character. (Cicero and Natural Law and all... I'm not an expert yet, but I'm loving the learning!) Human beings have moral character inherent in them, and when society denies it, we really, really suffer.
So... while we try to keep virtue from being chased from the public square, I feel that it's ever more critical to have strong families and moral individuals (since it's a lot easier to teach with reinforcement!). Way to teach right & wrong, Sarah! :-)
And I have to say, I like the "Amish or the Mormons" quote in your comment; as one of the latter, it's flattering :-). One of my favorite quotes actually comes from Joseph Smith and ties right into this whole discussion; very lightly paraphrased, it's "teach the people correct principles, and they govern themselves."
Posted by: kannie at December 02, 2008 01:50 PM (iT8dn)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
December 01, 2008
DEATH WISH
Nothing to do but cut and run, huh? What else? What about the old American social custom of self-defense? If the police don't defend us, maybe we ought to do it ourselves.
We're not pioneers anymore, Dad.
What are we, Jack?
What do you mean?
I mean, if we're not pioneers, what have we become? What do you call people who, when they're faced with a condition of fear, do nothing about it, they just run and hide?
Civilized?
No.
I watched Death Wish tonight. This scene reminded me of something I read yesterday about Mumbai:
But what angered Mr D'Souza almost as much were the masses of armed police hiding in the area who simply refused to shoot back. "There were armed policemen hiding all around the station but none of them did anything," he said. "At one point, I ran up to them and told them to use their weapons. I said, 'Shoot them, they're sitting ducks!' but they just didn't shoot back."
If being civilized means that we let barbarians destroy everything we hold sacred, then count me out.
The last time I wrote about vigilantism, Amritas left this comment:
Is there a correlation between vigilante fantasy entertainment and an increasingly criminal-coddling society? (The rise of the Death Wish movies after the 60s might indicate that the answer is yes.) I don't think there was anything 'cool' about frontier justice 'back in the day'; it was a harsh fact of life. But nowadays such justice has turned into escapism and the reality is that people want to deny responsibility.
How much easier things would be if a Batman would come along and take care of the War on Terror for us. If someone else could take care of the barbarians at the gates. If someone else could go and fight the dragons.
If we could sit and watch from the sidelines while someone else polices the world.
But thank heavens there are some people in this world who are not sidelines people. From the imdb page on Death Wish:
After finishing The Stone Killer (1973), Charles Bronson and Michael Winner wanted to make another film together, and were discussing further projects. "What do we do next?" asked Bronson. "The best script I've got is 'Death Wish'. It's about a man whose wife and daughter are mugged and he goes out and shoots muggers," said Winner. "I'd like to do that," Bronson said. "The film?" asked Winner. Bronson replied, "No . . . shoot muggers."
Posted by: Sarah at
03:30 PM
| Comments (10)
| Add Comment
Post contains 421 words, total size 3 kb.
1
Call me shallow, silly, and uncouth, but I admit to being terribly disappointed that the "world police" link didn't take me to a video clip from Team America, preferably one in which part of France explodes.
However, there were lots of good thoughts here (with links to more), so I will get over it.
Sig
Posted by: Sig at December 01, 2008 06:47 PM (ikRCN)
2
"All it takes for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing."
but more importantly, "an armed society is a polite society." Would an attack like this be possible in the United States? In every large metro area, handguns are almost universally outlawed. Even as a holder of a CCW permit in PA, I cannot Carry in Philadelphia. So the answer, could it happen here, is "Hell, I'm surprised it hasn't... yet."
Posted by: Chuck Z at December 01, 2008 07:07 PM (q4psF)
3
The title makes me wonder if the West has a death wish. Certainly not all of it does. Sarah and her readers are on the side of life. But I'm not so sure about a lot of others ...
Chuck Z,
I'm surprised Mumbai-type attacks haven't happened here either. Even if Philadelphians and other big city dwellers were armed, our doors are still wide open. And I wonder if guns really deter jihadis who are willing to die.
Don't get me wrong. I'm all for civilians shooting jihadis. I think guns do deter cowardly criminals. And I'm not afraid of CCW permit holders.
As Toren wrote,
... statistics from the Department of Justice and the FBI show that concealed carry permit holders nationwide are almost 50% less likely to kill someone.
Sarah wrote:
If being civilized means that we let barbarians destroy everything we hold sacred, then count me out.
This reminds me of something I just read yesterday:
Is the moral purpose of those who are good, self-immolation for the sake of those who are evil?
- Ayn Rand,
Atlas Shrugged
Why do leftists defend reactionary jihadis who oppose feminism and gay rights - who should be "evil" in their eyes? Is it because they believe in the "anti-morality" that Rand described?
Thanks to Sarah for quoting me. The hunger for vigilante fantasies persists, judging from the recent
Punisher: War Zone movie ads on TV.
The Punisher was a minor comic book character in 1973 who became a Marvel superstar a decade later, in the age of Bernhard Goetz: a modernized, gun-toting, maskless Batman.
It occurred to me tonight that many Batman fans are probably - and ironically pro-gun control and left-wing. They dream of a vigilante but they prefer the State in real life.
Professional comics writer James Hudnall pointed out that "a lot of people in comics" are leftists. In my experience, that includes a lot of creators as well as fans.
Will they miss Bruce Wayne after he "dies"? (Pointless "killings" followed by predictable resurrections are commonplace in modern antiheroic American comic books.)
Posted by: Amritas at December 01, 2008 09:19 PM (zc9j7)
4
And, of course, the guns that are being railed against in the gun control lobby as causing crime and mayhem are generally illegally gotten to start with. So, like, further laws are going to affect them, right?
Sheesh.
And it's not just guns, either. If a criminal breaks into your house and your dog bites the ever-lovin' crap out of them. Even damages them severely for their illegal foray into your house... You lose your dog. They will put your dog to sleep for protecting your house against a criminal.
I have to check into the rules everywhere we go because Ike is banned and subject to special penalties for being "vicious." But the penalties are truly ridiculous for all dogs. And that is for them defending their home.
Somewhere along the way, society got the idea that life is supposed to be "safe" when life has never been "safe". So those who follow the rules get victimized by those who would never follow the rules to begin with.
Posted by: airforcewife at December 02, 2008 04:30 AM (Fb2PC)
5
What WOULD we do? We have guns in our house, most are locked tightly in a safe, but the air pellet gun to scare the squirrels and wild hogs that come through are at hand. Would they scare an intruder? I don't know. Would we have time to get the 22, again I don't know.
As for vigilantes, is does seem necessary sometimes, but there is a fine line between vigilantism and anarchy. It is a definable line, but thin.
I do not feel as unsafe as I did last week. We went to Mexico for the holiday weekend. My son and his wife are cavers, they go there all the time. They go in through a safe little town, stay on the back roads mainly and stay in small, extremely friendly towns and villages. We saw NO violence, no unfriendly gangs of teenage boys, or otherwise indications of any anger directed towards us or anyone else. We did visit the larger city of Saltillo, it is very crowded and we went through some parts that looked very different, but everyone was friendly. And then I come home and read of massacres in Tiajuana. If you stay away from the druglord parts of the border it seems safe.
One reason I feel safer is we missed what surely must have been the round the clock coverage of Mumbai, it was on the Mexican news but we watched that only briefly. And if makes me wonder if round the clock coverage doesn't feed violence.
Posted by: Ruth H at December 02, 2008 04:56 AM (4eLhB)
6
airforcewife,
And, of course, the guns that are being railed against in the gun control lobby as causing crime and mayhem are generally illegally gotten to start with. So, like, further laws are going to affect them, right?
I don't think that's the real purpose of gun control laws. Our society is concerned with appearances. Get (not "earn") that A,
even if you have to cheat. Promote peace through disarming the law-abiding. The only consequence that "matters" is
looking like a saint ... but by whose standard? Other consequences don't matter to the anointed who live in gated communities. They claim to be egalitarian but they think "lesser" people who can't afford their sheltered existence "deserve" what happens to them.
Dogs die for defending their homes? Madness! I thought I've heard about something similar in the UK, but I couldn't quickly Google any examples.
So those who follow the rules get victimized by those who would never follow the rules to begin with.
That sadly sums up our situation.
Posted by: kevin at December 02, 2008 07:50 AM (+nV09)
Posted by: Leofwende at December 02, 2008 09:05 AM (jAos7)
8
Amritas -- This is the same philosophy that made Obama say that he supported raising the capital gains tax
despite the evidence that shows that the government will take in less revenue because it's an issue of "fairness." It's about looking like he's being fair, at to detriment of everyone.
Posted by: Sarah at December 02, 2008 09:32 AM (TWet1)
9
RuthH, I don't think 24 hour news coverage feeds violence, it just makes us feel less safe. And the less safe we feel, the more we demand that "Someone must do something!"
And usually that something is more laws that criminals won't follow anyway but that keep law abiding citizens from protecting themselves.
There is a thin line between vigilantism and anarchy, sure. But why is protecting yourself vigilantism? Vigilantism is pro-active. Protecting yourself is defensive.
I've had tough looking guys cross the street when I'm out walking my dog (you know, the dog that Sarah's Charlie physically maimed during a visit?) because he LOOKS mean. And I do know for a fact that he can be mean. But he won't attack unless someone is threatening me or our home.
That is not vigilantism, that is defense.
Posted by: airforcewife at December 02, 2008 11:15 AM (Fb2PC)
10
Leofwende,
mu.nu hates me too. Join the club.

It seems kevin has gone sane for once.
Thanks for the Seattle anecdote. One benefit of the Internet is the ability to learn about what's going on beyond the local and national level through the MSM filter.
the mayor is trying to push it through anyway
What a moral man, putting principle before the law. The criminals who will remain armed will be so grateful.
airforcewife,
Thanks for explaining how media hysteria fuels the expansion of state power. It doesn't help that misfortune is profitable. I confess, I ignored TV news for years until 9/11 had me glued for a week. This principle also applies on a less epic scale. A single murder can be dragged out seemingly ad infinitum while other more important news is ignored. Is such coverage really a public service, or is it sensationalism? Is relentless negativity driving the public away from the MSM, or is the rise of the Internet more relevant than televised content?
Vigilantism is pro-active. Protecting yourself is defensive.
I.e., reactive. I won't confuse your dog with a lynch mob.
you know, the dog that Sarah's Charlie physically maimed during a visit?
Now you've got me scared of Charlie!
Posted by: Amritas at December 02, 2008 03:31 PM (zc9j7)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
HUH?
Just heard on the radio: "The historic move to make Hillary Clinton Secretary of State..."
I don't get it. What's historic about it? We currently have a female Secretary of State. What, it's historic to give a former president's wife such an important job?
Yep, still cynical.
Posted by: Sarah at
06:03 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 49 words, total size 1 kb.
1
EVERYTHING about P.E. Obama is historic. Get it?
Posted by: airforcewife at December 01, 2008 08:15 AM (Fb2PC)
2
Deluded conservatives are convinced that Condoleezza Rice is a "woman" (their spelling, not ours). All small-r right thinking people know that sexist right-wing extremists are opposed to womyn in government.
These same insane subhumyns also believe that Rice is an African-American.
We pity their inability to grasp the true underlying reality.
Posted by: kevin at December 01, 2008 09:54 AM (+nV09)
3
I don't get it. Is this a troll, or sarcasm, or just weird?
Sig
Posted by: Sig at December 01, 2008 02:27 PM (542IL)
4
Well, Hillary is the first female Secretary of State who *doesn't* have a PhD....I guess that's a milestone of some kind.
Posted by: david foster at December 02, 2008 12:02 PM (d098a)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
DECEMBER
Now it is the month when my husband comes home from deployment.
I still haven't watched the Terminator movies yet because they are on backorder. Same with 3: The Dale Earnhardt Story, which has been in my queue the entire time my husband has been gone.
Seems we mouth-breathin', gun-clingin' rednecks are all lined up to watch our moving pictures.
But there's plenty of Redacteds to rent.
I also have been working a lot, since I got promoted right before Christmas and right when the only other person who can do my job had back surgery. Oh well, a few more hours gives me a little more wealth for Obama to spread around.
Cynical today, eh?
Posted by: Sarah at
03:34 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 118 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I got promoted right before Christmas
Congratulations?
Did I say the wrong thing? I don't want to anger a mouth-breathin', gun-clingin' redneck.
Posted by: Amritas at December 01, 2008 09:18 AM (+nV09)
2
We live to anger such people, to hear the last cries of the conservatives bemoaning the death of their Europpressive mythology.
Rent
Redacted. Of course it is whitewashed, but it is a necessary first step toward the truth.
Perhaps by "Christmas" - a day no revolutionary needs - you will be ready for
이름 없는 영웅들. You will be mesmerized for twenty hours straight. The Dear Leader will be pleased.
Posted by: kevin at December 01, 2008 10:17 AM (+nV09)
3
I watched the first Terminator for the first time this last weekend. Then hubby and I rented that new-ish TV series,
The Sarah Connor Chronicles, and we've been watching it pretty much all weekend. It's not that good, but it was something. *shrug*
Posted by: Leofwende at December 01, 2008 12:18 PM (jAos7)
4
Leofwende,
Now I don't feel so bad about having never seen
Raiders of the Lost Ark.
As for TV worth renting, I'd rather watch
Sarah Tries to Grok. I look forward to the episode guest starring
Ben Stein.
Posted by: Amritas at December 01, 2008 12:36 PM (+nV09)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
96kb generated in CPU 0.0199, elapsed 0.1054 seconds.
57 queries taking 0.0923 seconds, 257 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.