April 03, 2008
BOO-YA
Let the going nuts commence:
Real Katrina hero? Wal-Mart, study says
"Profit-seeking firms beat most of the government to the scene and provided more effectively the supplies needed for the immediate survival of a population cut off from life's most basic necessities," Horwitz wrote in the study, which was published by the Mercatus Center at George Mason University in Fairfax, Va. "Though numerous private-sector firms played important roles in the relief operations, Wal-Mart stood out."
Stuff Mentioned That White People Hate:
free market solutions
corporations
evil Wal-Mart
the government sucking
bottom-up problem solving
how price gouging saves and appropriately distributes resources
(This blog post patterned off of the White People in the News category at Stuff White People Like.)
Posted by: Sarah at
02:18 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 121 words, total size 1 kb.
1
how price gouging saves and appropriately distributes resources
That is one of my favorite and so misunderstood economic concepts. People were going nuts that ice was selling for $50 a bag after the hurricane on Kauai: well, um, this might save someone from just buying it to cool their beer, so that someone in genuine need (needs to keep medicine cold) can buy it, at an albeit outrageous price...but it's still there...whereas otherwise it would be melted in some beer cooler.
Thanks for linking to this.
Posted by: CaliValleyGirl at April 03, 2008 04:09 AM (U2RJu)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
April 02, 2008
"PUNISHED"
I considered writing about Obama and his "I donÂ’t want them punished with a baby" comment. Then I considered not writing about it because I am weary of thinking about other people having unwanted babies. But I will just say a couple of things.
As much as I want a baby now, that's how much I did not want a baby previously. I can't say that I would've used the word "punished," but I would not have been happy if I had gotten pregnant before I was ready. Not happy.
Right before my husband left for Iraq the last time, he was out on a training exercise for a month. During that time, my grandmother died. I was stressed with his upcoming deployment and being half a world away while my mother was losing her only living parent. And I was ten days late for my period. Even though my husband was in the field and there was no possible way I could've been pregnant, I was freaked out. I did not want a baby. I had been married for a year and a half, we had the same good relationship that we have now, and yet I did not want to have a baby yet. Not at all. I know we would've gone on to be OK with it and been a great family, but still I'm glad I wasn't pregnant back then. Even knowing what I know now -- how hard it's been to start a family -- I still can't honestly say I would've wanted it to happen four years ago.
Much less before I was married. No freaking way.
So that's my thoughts on that. I don't think "punished" was the right word to use, but I completely understand Obama's idea that a baby isn't always a blessed miracle. And while today it is really hard for me to think about all the unwanted babies in the world when we want one so badly, I still can't say I think it's appropriate to saddle young girls with a baby they don't want. Having to have a baby you don't want is the flip side of the coin to not being able to have a baby you desperately want. I wish no one ever had to live through either scenario.
Rachel Lucas has more thoughts on the matter: Reality always trumps idealism.
Posted by: Sarah at
03:39 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 397 words, total size 2 kb.
1
The feminist of the 60's and 70's have really done a number on us. Making us think we aren't responsible for our actions, even actions that create life. By the time that baby is in your belly you've already made your choice. Now you have to deal with it. Married, not married, young, old, everyone knows how babies are made if its that important to you to not have one then don't have sex. I'm not all about waiting for marriage but as women, we are the safe guards of our bodies and its ability to sustain and bring new life into this world. If that power were taken seriously there would be no need for roe v. wade, and 16 year old girls wouldn't be in these situations. A baby is ALWAYS a miracle whether it is seen as one or not by the people whos selfishness brought it into this world.
Posted by: g at April 02, 2008 02:29 PM (Xb/i6)
2
... I have mixed feelings about this issue and don't have a clear position. But that's not what I want to talk about - having babies vs. not having babies.
I would like to chew on the idea that women are the "safeguards" of their bodies...
As much as I want to believe this, I know and have seen otherwise.
In a perfect world a woman (and a man) CAN expect to safeguard their body and know that no one would violate that. That the word "no" is heard and respected.
As long as sex is used for more than procreation and an expression of passion, affection and love, and is also used as a tool of violence... I'm not sure it's fair to say women are responsible for safeguarding their bodies. Because then if their bodies are violated, are we saying it's their fault?
I realize this isn't on topic, and yet the issue of a woman's body being hers and hers to decide what to do with (child bearing including) is often intertwined with the violence that has been done against women as a way to say her body is not hers.
Posted by: Crys at April 02, 2008 02:55 PM (dqGUK)
3
My thoughts don't apply to women who are violated and have violence done toward them. That is another topic all together. I am talking about women who choose to engage in sexual intercourse.
Of course a woman has the right to decide whether or not she wants children. Only she can determine if she is in the right place in her life, the right relationship, and if its the right time. I just feel like the time to decide these things is well before a baby is growing inside of you. I mean "safeguard", not in a prudish, holding tightly onto one's virginity way, but rather in a self respecting way. Having a deep understanding of your body and the power it holds. To take all matters of birth control into your own hands, knowing full well that if a pregnancy occurs you will be bearing the brunt, especially if its with a man you doesn't care about you or the impending child. But hopefully a smart gal wouldn't have sex with a man like that.
I have so much to say on this subject I can't put it into words that really convey my feelings adequately. I just think women need to take more responsibility well before they are faced with the decision of "do I want to keep it".
I recently had a baby, and the whole thing still blows me away. To think that this perfect whole human being with a heart and a brain and a soul, did not exist before two people had sex. That's all it took to create LIFE. This post just struck a nerve with me. Sure no one should be "saddled" with a baby, but I don't think people should be able to take an innocent life either. A life that wouldn't exist if not for their actions.
Posted by: g at April 02, 2008 06:07 PM (Xb/i6)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
NO REPEATS
I found this article funny --
Average British family eats the same six meals every week -- because it's a running joke in our family that we
never eat the same thing twice. The only time we have repeats is when we have company over because I'm not brave enough to try something untested when guests are coming. Otherwise, I browse the cookbooks every week and find something new to try. The downside to this is that my husband is not so vocal about what he likes and dislikes. He said once, "What's the point; even if I love it, we're still not going to have it again." I say there will be plenty of time for repeats once we have kids. For now, there's no reason why I can't spend three hours making enchillada green sauce from scratch. Yum.
Posted by: Sarah at
03:21 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 144 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I used to spend every summer on my grandparents' farm in England and my grandmother would make a warm meal every lunch time: and it was pretty much a weekly set menu that never changed in all the years I went. My memory is faint now, but I remember that Wendesdays and Sundays were always roast chicken. If it was going to be a hot day, the roast chicken would be cooked the evening before and eaten with a salad the next day at lunch. Saturdays were always roast beef, and Fridays were always fish and chips (the only day my grandmother didn't make lunch). I think Tuesdays were a pork roast. There was always a side of potatoes (grown in my grandfather's garden), and two sides of veggies, either cabbage, carrots, cauliflower, green beans, or peas. Oh, and there was always a side of Yorkshire pudding!
Perhaps the set menu thing is a British thing...?
Posted by: CaliValleyGirl at April 02, 2008 06:37 AM (U2RJu)
2
We had the same rotating menu every 2 weeks. You can always shop for it easily and know how long it's going to take. But it's very similar to CVG's menu. Dishes rotated depending on the season too.
Of course now I spend all weekend cooking for essentially 2 weeks so I don't have to eat take out or worse, frozen crap filled with high fructose corn syrup. But being a great cook was something I just got from experience.
My dishes tend more to things like Blueberry Chicken and Black bean chili, but I still like a nice pot roast.
Posted by: Mare at April 02, 2008 08:40 AM (EI19G)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
April 01, 2008
SIGH
I finished reading Milton Friedman's
Capitalism and Freedom. I think for accessibility's sake I prefer Thomas Sowell's books, but without Friedman there would be no Sowell.
One thing that struck me was how little progress we've made in 46 years. Most of the points Friedman argues are the same points I've heard from the likes of Sowell, Stossel, or Elder. School vouchers, ending the minimum wage, a flat tax, the unsustainablility of social security: Friedman was talking about all of these things in 1962. 1962, for pete's sake. And we haven't done anything about it since then? These problems have been common knowledge for nearly 50 years, and still we manage to screw it up.
A lot of the book felt like it could've been written last week, since we still face the same stupid issues today. That is, until he starts using actual facts and figures.
In 1961, government amounted to something like $33 billion (federal, state, and local) on direct welfare payments and programs of all kinds: old age assistance, social security benefit payments, aid to dependent children, general assistance, farm price support programs, public housing, etc.
Then you see just how boned we are. Each of these programs alone is more than $33 billion these days.
We've had 46 years to take the advice of the world's greatest economist. Why have we been so stupid?
Posted by: Sarah at
03:14 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 230 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I laughed the other day when, on FOX, the reporter announced that Social Security MIGHT run out by something like 2043. News flash: we already knew this. My dad told me at age 18 that every penny I earned would be taxed and given to someone else for Social Security and that I would never see ANY of it. I guess I accepted it a long time ago. Why is this news????
Posted by: Nicole at April 01, 2008 09:53 AM (YHVU/)
Posted by: Green at April 01, 2008 05:25 PM (6Co0L)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
MIND GAMES
Do you remember that episode of
House where all those people got sick on the airplane, and it turned out they were all psychosomatic? I completely believe in the power to think you're sick and the placebo effect. One thing I would love to see, which is a completely unethical experiment, is to give women positive pregnancy tests when they're not pregnant and see what symptoms they report. I would bet that most of them imagine themselves nauseated.
For over a year now, I have spent the final days of every month trying to guess whether I feel pregnant or not. All of a sudden, you notice every twitch and twinge in your body. There are pains in your abdomen you swear you've never felt before. You sit and wonder if you could throw up. And every month save one, all those symptoms I felt were imaginary. It's amazing what the mind can be tricked into thinking when you really want to be pregnant.
So I'm sitting here trying to fight back nausea that most likely only exists in my head. Mind over...mind? And then at the end of every month, I have this fight with myself because I get so annoyed that I fall for it every month. I berate myself for even entertaining the hope. Because when you start to feel the twinges and nausea, you start to imagine all the good stuff: taking a positive test, calling mom and dad, finally getting to use all the lovely things I got at my baby shower. And then it just hurts your heart even more when it turns out to all be in your head. It's a stupid cycle.
Posted by: Sarah at
02:52 AM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
Post contains 284 words, total size 2 kb.
1
I swear I further ruined my eyesight by squinting at pregnancy tests trying to see the results. I always felt nauseated. Any ache or pain and my heart would soar.
When M1 actually set up residence, my boobs felt like hot, tingly water balloons & I was mad...I thought the massage therapist I'd seen had used some kind of oil on my neck that was making me have an allergic reaction. Since I'd given up any hope of anything, it didn't occur to me that it honestly could be THAT.
The mind has such an awesome power over our bodies...it's magical, but also kinda scary.
I'm not sure what I'm rambling about except to say--I feel you. {{Hugs}}
Posted by: Guard Wife at April 01, 2008 04:15 AM (h6nYc)
2
I've been there, too. It sucks. Even had a pregnancy test that showed up positive immediately, and then the positive line disappeared. The manufacturer told me it was still a positive result but really all three tests in the box were defective. Just an awful feeling when my period finally showed up.
I think we all fall for it every month because it is so hard not to.
Posted by: Ann M. at April 01, 2008 07:04 AM (HFUBt)
3
Before I found out my exhusband "forgot" to tell me he was fixed, I went through 3 false pregnancies. I agree 100% with you. It is AMAZING what our mind can do....
Posted by: Tammi at April 01, 2008 08:19 AM (53IQq)
4
It is also possible that your PMS hormones are causing nausea that is not in your mind. I used to get that when I knew I was not pregnant. I had tubal ligation with my last child, yet I had many of the symptoms you are describing. The doctor said it was only hormones. Duh!
Posted by: Ruth H at April 01, 2008 09:53 AM (4u82p)
5
I agree with Ruth H. I could never use symptoms to tell whether I was pregnant or not – I got all the symptoms during PMS, though on a smaller scale. I could *suspect* pregnancy if my boobs felt extra tender (like I'd been kicked by a mule), but I wouldn't take it seriously until I had a positive test. Even my temperature could be tricky. I have long cycles, and I could go forty days and have a few symptoms (going to the bathroom all the time, mainly) and then my temp would drop and I'd have my period. I decided that was a miscarriage – chemical or mental, I'd never know. I was too chicken to take a test to confirm it.
Posted by: deltasierra at April 01, 2008 11:09 AM (7uphd)
6
Just hang in there. One of these days it won't all be in your head.
Posted by: sharona at April 01, 2008 03:00 PM (BeRta)
7
That is so funny!
I have had a problem of too much spit in a couple of my pregnancies. I'm sure you wanted to know that. Anywho...
Back in January, just after my dh deployed I suddenly started to worry that I was pregnant....and I started to wonder if I had the regular amount of saliva or if I had too much... The more I worried about it, the more saliva I seemed to have.
I took a pregnancy test. It was negative, but I didn't believe it and still analyzed my spit until my . started. Then my spit magically went back to normal.
I am losing it!
Posted by: wendy's tiki hut at April 03, 2008 12:33 AM (56tHP)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
63kb generated in CPU 0.0166, elapsed 0.1001 seconds.
52 queries taking 0.0898 seconds, 218 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.