July 15, 2004
COOL
Tony Blair is cool.
"No one lied. No one made up the intelligence. No one inserted things into the dossier against the advice of the intelligence services. Everyone genuinely tried to do their best in good faith for the country in circumstances of acute difficulty. That issue of good faith should now be at an end ... But I have to accept, as the months have passed, it seems increasingly clear that at the time of invasion, Saddam did not have stockpiles of chemical or biological weapons ready to deploy ... I have searched my conscience, not in the spirit of obstinacy, but in genuine reconsideration in the light of what we now know, in answer to that question. And my answer would be that the evidence of Saddam's WMD was indeed less certain, less well-founded than was stated at the time. But I cannot go from there to the opposite extreme. On any basis he retained complete strategic intent on WMD and significant capability. The only reason he ever let the inspectors back into Iraq was that he had 180,000 US and British troops on his doorstep ... Had we backed down in respect of Saddam, we would never have taken the stand we needed to take on WMD, never have got progress on Libya ... and we would have left Saddam in charge of Iraq, with every malign intent and capability still in place and every dictator with the same intent everywhere immeasurably emboldened. For any mistakes made, as the report finds, in good faith, I of course take full responsibility. But I cannot honestly say I believe getting rid of Saddam was a mistake at all."
(via Andrew Sullivan)
Posted by: Sarah at
04:57 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 284 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Don't you just want to nail that to the forehead of every idiot who clings to the "Bush lied" meme like a tired, desperate swimmer to a seat cushion? I know
I do.
Posted by: CavalierX at July 15, 2004 10:28 PM (sA6XT)
2
I wish I could. Not that it would make any difference, "Bush lied" is just an excuse. If they can't use this one anymore, they'll make up a few more.
Posted by: John at July 16, 2004 12:58 AM (+Ysxp)
3
Compare Blair's statement:
"For any mistakes made, as the report finds, in good faith, I of course take full responsibility."
with Bush's statement:
"I hope -- I don't want to sound like I have made no mistakes. I'm confident I have. I just haven't -- you just put me under the spot here, and maybe I'm not as quick on my feet as I should be in coming up with one."
One is saying "the buck stops here," the other is all but saying "What buck?"
If and when Bush stops acting as if he has an infallibility streak that makes "ex cathedra" look tame, then I'll start giving him the benefit of the doubt.
Posted by: Can't win at July 16, 2004 06:56 PM (aQOKC)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
DEDICATION
I've bragged before about how wonderful my students are; tonight one of them outdid anything I've seen yet. Right before I was leaving my house, my phone rang: it was a student, one of the two students I have who drive more than an hour each way to come to class. He had gotten all the way to post and realized he'd forgotten his wallet, so he couldn't get in. I gave him the phone number of another student so he could get signed in as a guest. When I got to class, he wasn't there, so I figured he didn't have any identification on him and they wouldn't let him on even as a guest. About fifteen minutes after class started, he came in through the door. He had driven
all the way back home just to get his ID so he could attend class. He said he was speeding like a madman, but he wanted to make it back in time for our class.
Now that's dedication...
Posted by: Sarah at
04:48 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 171 words, total size 1 kb.
MONSTER
True story: I was walking the dog this evening when an animal ran out of the hedges and down the sidewalk in front of us. It was in my sight for at least five seconds, running away from us, and I was staring at it trying to figure out what it was. After it dashed out of sight, I stood there, puzzled at what I had seen. I figured it must have been a baby deer, even though it looked more like it was hopping than running. If someone told me it was a kangaroo, no lie, I might've believed it. When the dog and I got to the end of the hedges and turned, there it was again, this time from a side view. As it ran off, startled, I realized that I had just seen my first hare. Lord, was it humungous. It was bigger than the dog, with powerful legs and stiff ears. I then also realized why the flowers in front of my house have not only been nibbled to death, they've been ripped from the earth, roots and all. An animal that big could pull a whole bush up. Man, this hare put Illinois' bunnies to shame; it was a beautiful sight.
Posted by: Sarah at
04:42 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 209 words, total size 1 kb.
POLL
I hesitate to even say the p-word here on my blog again, in light of what happened last time, but Joshua Sharf has an
interesting post about the new WaPo poll.
(By the way, if you're not reading Oh, That Liberal Media every day, you're missing out on some shocking stuff.)
Posted by: Sarah at
08:15 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 53 words, total size 1 kb.
1
On the other hand, if you're reading 'O,
That Liberal Media' every day, you get a completely biased picture of the media. Try
CJR Campaign Desk instead.
Posted by: Sander at July 15, 2004 02:21 PM (3nJmx)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
GASP
Surprise, surprise. Someone at the NYTimes is
donating money to Kerry. Gasp.
(via Iraq Now)
Posted by: Sarah at
04:34 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 17 words, total size 1 kb.
1
See...If you lived here in NYC, you would know that the NY Times is *sponsoring* the Republican National Convention. But you don't live here and spout off about the Times anyway.
BTW, who is Rupert Murdoch giving money to? Well just in 2004 he did the following:
$25,000 to Republican National Cmte
$2,000 to Ryan, Jack
$2,000 to Jones, Bill
More at:
http://www.opensecrets.org/indivs/search.asp?Order=D&txtName=MURDOCH%2C&txtState=&txtZip=&txtEmploy=&txtCand=&txt2004=Y&txt2002=Y&txt2000=Y&txt1998=&txt1996=&txt1994=&txt1992=&txt1990=&txtSoft=N
Posted by: rfidtag . at July 15, 2004 09:41 PM (/qocr)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
NAZI
Tim found a good article by John Leo about
the power of blogging.
Plus I read another Leo article and found this line, about googling Bush=Hitler, hysterical:
The odd thing is that I typed in the names of every Nazi I ever heard of, excluding only Hitler himself, and the group total was still less than George Bush gets alone. This might indicate that either that George Bush is by far the second most important Nazi of all time, or that the Democrats and the left now require some sedation.
Posted by: Sarah at
04:26 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 92 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: sTEVE at July 15, 2004 09:18 AM (8HxzN)
2
If you google "igniting", "farts", and "jpg", my blog comes up. I don't know why, as I've never blogged about igniting farts, nor do I have any jpegs of the sport. All I can figure is that Karl Rove has google-bombed me somehow.
Posted by: Liberal Larry at July 15, 2004 04:49 PM (7ldvV)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
JENSEN
I read Robert Jensen's article
Stupid White Movie: What Michael Moore Misses About the Empire via
Hud. I certainly don't agree with many things in this article, but at least Jenson and I can find
some common ground:
And what of the analysis of Iraq? Moore is correct in pointing out that U.S. support for Iraq during the 1980s, when Saddam Hussein's war on Iran was looked upon favorably by U.S. policymakers, was a central part of Reagan and Bush I policy up to the Gulf War. And he's correct in pointing out that Bush II's invasion and occupation have caused great suffering in Iraq. What is missing is the intervening eight years in which the Clinton administration used the harshest economic embargo in modern history and regular bombing to further devastate an already devastated country. He fails to point out that Clinton killed more Iraqis through that policy than either of the Bush presidents. He fails to mention the 1998 Clinton cruise missile attack on Iraq, which was every bit as illegal as the 2003 invasion.
Jensen lost me when he spoke ill of the military, which is not surprising given my admitted knee-jerk love of all things camouflage, but at least I could read the article and try to see his point.
Posted by: Sarah at
04:15 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 216 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I think a lot of his arguments are based on his leftist ideology. His assumptions about US motoivations, etc. But I think he makes valid criticisms of Moore's >ahem< movie.
Specifically, the patronizing way he depicts coalition partners. And of coure, both he and Moore conviently avoid mentioning major counries lie Australia, Spain, South Korea, Japan, Italy, Poland were also in this Coalition. Moore is a dishonest fraud.
As someone who was a poor white kid when he joined the Air Force I am also really offended by his portrayal of people being tricked into joining the service. Like, we're too stupid to realize we might have to fight for real.
The problem with people like him is the sickening superiority complex many on the left have. You can hear it in Moore's voice as he narrates the film or in many TV news people.
But the times they are a changing!
Posted by: James Hudnall at July 15, 2004 04:37 AM (FV8Tp)
2
Hud, the superiority complex is the absolute constant in the equation. I don't know how you deal with such folks on a daily basis. Do they treat you like an idiot, too?
Posted by: Mike at July 15, 2004 08:13 AM (MqNKC)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
July 14, 2004
EDITOR
A 12-yr-old girl wrote a
letter to the editor urging Americans to stand behind the President. She said that she doesn't agree with everything he's done, but he's our elected leader and we should give him the respect he's due and try to put ourselves in his shoes.
Smart kid.
Someone today decided to respond to the girl's letter (scroll to the second entry), beating the dead horse of Not Elected once again. This letter concludes with an absolutely ludacrous paragraph:
For the soldiers who are being shot at in Iraq, for freedom-loving citizens who see our country being turned into a police state, and for the 99 percent of us who haven’t benefited from Bush’s “tax relief” for billionaires, the best remedy is to relieve him of that stress, and his duties, on Nov. 2.
You go, man! Tell that 12 year old!
My husband's best friend said the other day that he's pretty much given up even reading the Stars and Stripes because of all the negative letters to the editor. That's a real shame.
Posted by: Sarah at
11:07 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 179 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Why does Stars and Stripes hate America?
Posted by: curveball at July 14, 2004 05:07 PM (/qocr)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
EXCEPTIONAL
Via
DGCI, I found this
transcript from Rush Limbaugh's show about the Kerry appearance on Larry King. Larry King and Linda Heinz-Kerry had the following exchange:
KING: What do you think, Teresa, would be the effect of another terror attack on the United States politically?
HEINZ-KERRY: I don't know. I think most Americans subconsciously believe something is going to happen. It's a matter of when. And it's a matter of how.
KING: Strange way to live, though.
HEINZ-KERRY: Yeah. But you know, Europeans have lived that way and other people around the world have lived that way. Americans have been very safe, at least as a nation.
Rush Limbaugh explained a serious difference in worldview between people on the Left and people on the Right:
America is exceptional. America is the shining light, city on the hill, beacon of freedom, all this, prosperous nation, superpower. The left doesn't like that. They don't believe in American exceptionalism. They think this is an accident. It's not fair we should be more prosperous. It's not fair we should be safer. We must learn to adapt as the Europeans have. And her husband didn't step in and disagree with any of this.
I encountered some of this in the class I took over the weekend. Our professor hails from Africa but has lived in Germany for thirty years. At times during the seminar, he seemed to be belittling the American response to 9/11. He too was operating under the viewpoint that these things have been going on in other parts of the world for much more than three years, and that al Qaeda and Islamic fundamentalism terrorism is nothing to get all worked up about. He kept pointing out how Americans think that terrorism started in September 2001 when in fact it's been going on in Europe for decades.
My question is, why does it seem that we're the only ones to try to do something about it?
Granted, 9/11 is much bigger than anything the Red Army Faction or other terrorist groups ever did, but why hasn't Europe been waging a War on Terror for the past few decades? It's funny that when France said "We're all Americans now," what they seemed to really mean is "We're all victims now." And Theresa Heinz-Kerry seems to agree. It sucks to live in fear, but hey, everyone else does it. That's not the type of mentality that I want running the country. I want "smoke 'em out"; I want "either you are with us or you are with the terrorists"; I want "bring 'em on." I don't want "I'm an internationalist. I'd like to see our troops dispersed through the world only at the directive of the United Nations."
I don't want to cower like the rest of the world does. I want us to be exceptional.
(Thanks for RWN for the quotes.)
MORE TO GROK:
Annika is a lot more blunt than I am...
Posted by: Sarah at
10:43 AM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 492 words, total size 3 kb.
1
"My question is, why does it seem that we're the only ones to try to do something about it?"
Well, in Israel we've been doing something about it for years, but we couldn't tell anybody. My second strongest memory from 9/11 is when Bush got on TV and said something like, "Our nation has been attacked". I can't tell you what it did to me. That one sentence tells the whole, forbidden truth. Israel has been the target of terrorism for decades, and I don't ever remember a Prime Minister saying, "Our nation has been attacked". "Now," I thought, "Now we can tell the truth too!" But we don't. We're not allowed to. Only the US is strong enough to tell the truth in spite of what the world says – and though I'm a strong supporter of Bush, I wish he would let us say it too.
Posted by: David Boxenhorn at July 14, 2004 12:04 PM (8uP3u)
2
Everyone keeps hearing about terrorism "Well it's nothing new to Europe" so why is the US making a big deal about it.
The plain and simple answer "We are not Europe, We ARE the US".
That means we won't appease, we won't back down and we don't turn our heads. That has been our way since we began and will be our way until time ends.
Posted by: Machelle at July 14, 2004 01:50 PM (ZAyoW)
3
Americans have been affected by terrorism for decades before 9/11. Before that date, we lived under the same mentality, it was a nuisance and nothing more. All the airplane hijackings, the kidnappings, the small scale attacks, all are similar to what the rest of the world endured for years, and we endured it with them.
9/11 was an escalation of the conflict. Never has anything like it been seen anywhere in the world. To equate that attack with what the rest of the world endures is to belittle what happened.
Nowhere in the world was the scale of destruction in both lives and property matched in a single event. Israel has borne the brunt for decades, and is resoundingly condemned by the majority of the world for fighting back, just as America is now. Israel understands, America understands, I fear other countries will refuse to open their eyes until the same happens to them.
Posted by: John at July 14, 2004 02:54 PM (+Ysxp)
4
I agree with you all, including Sarah. Things have to change and you only achieve that change by doing what is right, which means it'll be difficult. All I want is that this war on Islamic fascism end in my lifetime. I don't want to have to send our grandchildren into another world war to save Europe again. I want to win this with everything we have: military, diplomacy, subversively. And if we fail, at least we can say, we died trying.
Posted by: Moor at July 14, 2004 05:06 PM (xvwyL)
5
Limbaugh is a liar. It is interesting that those who call Michael Moore a liar would cite someone like Limbaugh or Bill O'Reilly, who have been lying consistently, viciously and blatantly for years on end.
Clicking on my name will get to a great link showing O'Reilly attacking a young man who lost his father on 9/11 for daring to try to speak his mind, and then O'Reilly lying about it afterward.
Posted by: ABB at July 15, 2004 04:34 AM (WJFwN)
6
Loads of Countries have been fighting the war on terror for years. Its just they didn't call it the "War on Terror". They just fought against the groups that were attacking them.
Israel, France, India, the UK, China, The Soviet Union/Russia to name a few have been fighting or are fighting terrorist groups for years. Nobody says oh well we are going to live with terrorism they all decided to fight, but they don't pretend they care about all terrorist groups.
Nobody cares about terrorist groups fighting against a distant country unless you are dragged into it. While Pakistan supports terrorists fighting India The US had no problem supporting Pakistan, or Afghanistan or a dozen other countries supporting terrorists. France could fight terrorists on one hand yet suppost its own terrorists when it suits them. This is done by everyone at various times.
What pisses so many people off about the war on Terror is it is regarded as the War on Some Terrorist groups. Namely the ones that are of interest to the US.
One thing about fighting terrorism is that it tends to go on for quite some time. This is where many people can adopt an attitude of "you just got to learn to live with it". The wars will go on until they are resolved mostly through,
1. Killing them all (terrorists + supporters).
2. Removing their supporters by compromising.
3. Leaving the area.
You can't win by force as long as there are people left standing who regard the terrorist as a freedom fighter, or a fighter for a just cause.
As for the comment "either you are with us or you are with the terrorists" that puts the US right into the terrorist camps in so many places. Wouldn't it leave the US in the camp of the IRA when they supported them
Its a comment that concerns me from its simplistic view of terrorism and the world. If its to be taken as a soundbite then fair enough it has the good old simplistic them or us rallying call. If its a world point of view its scary in its simplicity.
What if Britian used it as regards the large amounts of funds that flowed from the US into the coffers of the IRA. Or India said it about the backing of the Pakistani military that wsa busy financing and training and arming Islamic militants in Kashmir. Or Israel used it as regards the arms given to Iran while it was described as a terrorist state. These all drop the US squarely in the terrorist camp.
So which is it "either you are with us or you are with the terrorists" or perhaps a slightly more complicated world view?
Posted by: j at July 15, 2004 01:11 PM (AmfhK)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
July 13, 2004
TEMPERATURE
Oh, and what's the deal with the weather? Last summer we had a heat wave that killed thousands of French grannies; this year it's the Ice Age. It's currently 54º in my neck of the woods. I am still wearing sweaters and knee socks. In July.
I told my husband today that it's a shame we can't average his temperature (currently 93º at midnight) with my 54º and have a nice happy medium.
Posted by: Sarah at
05:03 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 75 words, total size 1 kb.
1
It's that global warming thing don't cha know? Only it's the Kerry version: it's cold before it's hot. Three days ago in SE Michigan we topped out at 65 (IN JULY), today is 85 and MUGGY! Ugh.
Posted by: MargeinMI at July 13, 2004 07:35 PM (fpNCQ)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
STAIRS
I've never been good at stairs. I never take my time, and I fall often. Going up, I usually don't lift my foot high enough and catch my toe on the edge. Going down, I usually put my heel too close to the edge and slip. One time when I was away at college, I came home for a weekend. I ran into the house and down to my dad in the family room, at which point I fell and came crashing down the flight of stairs. My dad just chuckled and said, "Sarah's home."
So tonight as I was walking up the stairs to class with my purse over one arm, my bag of class materials on the other, and a Taco Bell cup in one hand, it's no big shocker that I caught my toe on the step and crashed onto the landing. Since my hands were full, I didn't have any way to brace myself as I fell. The three Soldiers I was walking with were a pleasant change from my classmates in high school: rather than laughing and pointing, they immediately helped me up and made sure I was OK. Nonetheless, it was extremely embarrassing, and now the entire left side of my body hurts. I even have a nice big purple lump on the palm of my hand.
Only I could find a way to bruise my palm.
Posted by: Sarah at
04:53 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 235 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Sarah,
Don't worry Sarah. That happened to me my freshman year in between classes. I think EVERYONE was walking towards me when I decided to bite it. But I didn't have the perks of three soldiers helping me up!! Hang in there, Purple Palm!
Erin
Posted by: Erin at July 13, 2004 05:47 PM (YH3yV)
2
It's an hereditary thing in my family. My sisters and I were teasing mom about it one night and she was like, "Fine, what else are you going to blame on me?" To which we started listing things like, wide hips, bad handwriting, no sense of direction (except for me, don't know where I got that from as my dad was the worst for getting lost). I don't think she really expected that response. Hang in there girlfriend.
Posted by: MargeinMI at July 13, 2004 07:39 PM (fpNCQ)
3
I do the same thing all the time, only it gets worse during PMS. It's gotten to the point where I have to hold the rail walking up/down or I fall.
Posted by: Machelle at July 14, 2004 01:54 PM (ZAyoW)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
SPAM
I got an email spam today whose subject line still has me reeling: "fire hydrant gonads".
What on
earth is that supposed to mean?
Posted by: Sarah at
04:21 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 26 words, total size 1 kb.
1
"Ask the man who owns one!"
(Sorry, Sarah. Couldn't resist.)
Posted by: Francis W. Porretto at July 13, 2004 06:03 AM (MzH7h)
2
Oh, thankyouverymuch. Now I have to go wash my brain out with acid and a steel brush.
Posted by: Dominic at July 13, 2004 07:46 AM (g+Ivw)
3
Well, our fire hydrants are yellow...?
Posted by: Princess Jami at July 13, 2004 12:04 PM (0gPLe)
4
Ooooooh, check out your referrers too. Especially the search engine ones. Always entertaining.
Kal
Posted by: Kalroy at July 13, 2004 03:29 PM (VU2TV)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
WMDs
A good
NY Post article, via
DGCI:
The report condemns the CIA for overstating the intelligence it did have on Iraq's weaponry. But it doesn't claim that the CIA actively discarded or disregarded contravening evidence. There was almost no evidence that Saddam did not possess weapons of mass destruction until after the war was won and we began looking for them.
I know I've become a linker lately; the truth is that I don't have time for anything else. In fact, I should be grading papers right now instead of reading the NY Post. (I also don't have anything new to say that hasn't already been said elsewhere, but that's a different issue altogether.) My friend here, known for throwing hilarious fake tantrums, grumbled at me yesterday because I never come knit or sew with her anymore; I have a half-made quilt that's been sitting there for over six weeks. She's right; I don't do much of anything anymore except work, teach, grade, and try to get some sleep while other people's dogs are keeping me up all night. Only two and a half more weeks of this school term though, and then I get a break until October.
Posted by: Sarah at
04:16 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 201 words, total size 1 kb.
THIS LAND
Oh my goodness. I watched
This Land! (at LGF's urging) and laughed my fool head off the whole time. You must go see it too.
Posted by: Sarah at
02:39 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 29 words, total size 1 kb.
1
They actually played a portion of this on FOX News last night. Everyone on was laughing - then said.."Another fine example of fair and equal coverage from Fox News".
I thought it was pretty funny.
Posted by: Tammi at July 13, 2004 09:00 AM (Xm18O)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
July 12, 2004
YAY
Go and share the joy with Tim and Patti!
Posted by: Sarah at
01:41 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 11 words, total size 1 kb.
1
For some reason the first place I "went" this morning was to his site and Man o Man what a great way to start my week!!!! I'm so very happy for both of them. (btw - great sign)
Posted by: Tammi at July 12, 2004 03:01 PM (Xm18O)
Posted by: Maryellen at July 12, 2004 10:00 PM (W5nSP)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
OVER
GIs and Germany: A long love affair may soon be over was in the Stars and Stripes yesterday.
Posted by: Sarah at
05:52 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 20 words, total size 1 kb.
1
The article presents the story from the American view of it, I would like to read/know how the Germans feel about it and their views. Do you have any references?
Posted by: Machelle at July 12, 2004 05:35 PM (ZAyoW)
2
I searched around a bit and didn't find anything. I only know anecdotal evidence -- young people who have said we're not needed anymore, etc. There's stuff on the German radio every day about how many jobs will be lost when the bases close here. Interestingly enough, I've met very few Americans who are excited about leaving. I can think only of two others besides myself who think that the "love affair is over."
Posted by: Sarah at July 13, 2004 02:33 AM (TsgpG)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
86kb generated in CPU 0.0222, elapsed 0.082 seconds.
61 queries taking 0.0678 seconds, 263 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.