October 04, 2004
GUESTS
Man, there's a lot of hippies in the Munich airport. I haven't seen that much long hair and scraggly beards since high school.
My mom should be in the air by now. I can't believe five weeks went by so quickly. But we got to see five different countries, so you can't beat that.
Now I have to start getting ready for my next visitor: my husband is coming home for R&R at the end of the month! We're both getting incredibly excited, and the timing couldn't be better with my work schedule. Plus it's fun that he'll be here for both the presidential election and Veterans' Day.
More on that later...
Posted by: Sarah at
08:56 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 114 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I'm sorry to hear that your mother's gone, but I'm glad that Blue 6 will be back!
You saw Germany, France, and Italy with your mother, but what were the other two countries?
Posted by: Amritas at October 04, 2004 10:24 AM (uOTUR)
2
Both Austria and Czech Republic for an afternoon each
Posted by: Sarah at October 04, 2004 10:55 AM (RtxzU)
3
Thank you for one of the most enjoyable and relaxing trips I've ever had. You gave me lots of wonderful memories! Most importantly, I'm going to miss that smiling face each day and that hug each night. I love you!
Mama
Posted by: Nancy at October 06, 2004 02:31 AM (YuW6k)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
October 03, 2004
DEBATE
CavX, one of the smartest fellas out there, weighs in on the debate. I did get to see it in a rerun here, and I agree with
CavX's assessment. And I think Bush won. I just re-read the transcript. I don't care if the MSM networks are saying Kerry won, because in reality his answers were muddled and his thinking illogical.
Posted by: Sarah at
02:59 AM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 63 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I think Bush definitely won in the areas that count, being real and having substance. The MSM is trying to giveKerry a boost, but some polls are showing Bush gained points. We'll know more on Monday, but Kerry is such a fool, he is bound to lose big.
Posted by: James Hudnall at October 03, 2004 03:37 AM (FV8Tp)
2
Thanks for the compliment, Sarah. You know what? I've been thinking about it, and it may be that Bush deliberately threw away style points in a debate on a subject Kerry can't possibly beat him on. Expectations for Bush are now lowered for Friday's "town hall" style all-subjects debate (which will be the tough one), while expectations for Kerry are raised. Plus, I've seen clips of Kerry's speeches since then, and he's getting even more cocky and arrogant than before (which I didn't think possible). I've said before that Bush plays chess while his opponents play checkers; we'll see Friday whether that's true.
Posted by: CavalierX at October 03, 2004 08:28 AM (sA6XT)
3
A woman called a talk-radio program here after the debate and said she watched the debate with her kids (8 & 10, I think). Neither child was tuned in to the content, of course, but their observations were interesting. One said Kerry looked like a Bobble-head doll and the other said he seemed like a phony.
Some of us who actually judge real debates (high school forensics) are routinely faced with intros like Kerry made (sympathy for blah, blah, thanks to blah, blah, etc.) and with us that style (slightly) negatively impacts the scoring. But this was not a real debate, and there was no true scoring.
My perception is - if one had been carefully following the campaign, Bush won (McCurry to Lockhart 'it was a draw'), but if the debate was all one knew about the issues, Kerry won - he was smoother, and his inconsistencies and previously-disproved statements of fact went unnoticed (and unchallenged).
Posted by: Glenmore at October 03, 2004 10:28 AM (HtP2k)
4
This is a soldier's response to the debate.
http://jb-williams.com/soldier-debate1.htm
Posted by: Moor at October 03, 2004 02:12 PM (g8OfD)
5
I have seen many mentions of the President's hesitations, pauses, and troubled looks. What I have not seen is any mention that many/most/all of them came after some particularly fairy-dust pronouncement by the Junior Senator.
Every time, I could almost hear the President thinking "How can I respond to someone who claims to believe such rot?"
I am half expecting an announcement by the Junior Senator that he has received the official support of the Flat Earth Society.
Posted by: homebru at October 03, 2004 04:41 PM (hEnFa)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
PHASE II
John Kerry's problem seems to always be the devil in the details. Deskmerc is constantly trying to
figure out what goes on in Phase II, this time with
Kerry's plan to give nuclear fuel to Iran.
Gnome 2: Phase I we collect underpants.
Gnome 1: Ya, ya, ya. But what about Phase II?
[Silence]
Gnome 2: Well Phase III is profit. Get it?
Posted by: Sarah at
02:51 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 66 words, total size 1 kb.
October 02, 2004
TP
"Someone from your post died in Iraq this week, but he was someone from another unit," Mom said after dinner. "Oh. Who was it?" I asked from the other room. "Someone named
SGT Tyler Prewitt."
TP.
SGT Prewitt first emailed me from Iraq in June, to ask for help with getting a transcript. We wrote back and forth a couple of times to get all of his education records straight, so when he decided to register for online classes in August, he contacted me again. He had just emailed me because he was worried he was too busy soldiering to concentrate on the class. Ten days before that RPG.
His emails were always signed TP.
His memorial is Tuesday, and I plan on going. I wonder if his family could ever imagine that his school representative, someone he barely knew, is weeping.
MORE TO GROK:
Here's my first chance to see TP's face. Surprisingly enough, that's exactly what I had imagined.
Posted by: Sarah at
04:12 PM
| Comments (13)
| Add Comment
Post contains 163 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Someone in Florida that only knows him from what you've shared is weeping too.
Posted by: Tammi at October 02, 2004 06:15 PM (UOdfZ)
2
Sarah I am sorry for your loss. We are not in control of who touches our lives, even if briefly, and we are also not in control of how deeply someone can touch your heart, even if their touch was brief. I'm sure his family doesn't know...but your tears and thoughts are out there for them to feel. And my tears are with yours.
Posted by: Kathleen A at October 02, 2004 09:27 PM (vnAYT)
3
Crap Crap
Why is it always the best who must go? DOH cause they are all the best! Add my tears to yours and tell the family that normal folk know....
Posted by: LarryConley at October 03, 2004 12:36 AM (aontM)
4
Stay strong, Sarah; TP's family will need you...
Jim
Posted by: Jim Shawley at October 03, 2004 12:37 AM (a0DGD)
5
This never gets any easier when a soldier dies. I am always astounded when I read the background info on these brave soldiers. I always wonder were did we find all of these amazing brave men and women. Thanks Sarah for making Tyler more than just a number. Regrets Toni
Posted by: Toni at October 04, 2004 08:46 AM (SHqVu)
6
Sarah, it was my online sociology class that Tyler was taking. There are several others in Iraq in that class, as well. Tyler was doing well and then we stopped hearing from him. I've written his family with the condolences of the class.
Posted by: Dr. Rosenthal at October 04, 2004 09:17 AM (68JBf)
7
I knew of Tyler only as a friend of a friend. That friend is my girlfriend. Her name is Kayla, and after she found out I think she has cried everyday since. I never knew Tyler, but I know now, for sure, he must have been a great man. The sweetest, most honest, most wonderful, person I know, cared for him on a level that only a few friendships reach. I am very truly sorry, I know we all are. But there's something we all need to be, for Tyler, above all; proud.
Posted by: Chris at October 08, 2004 04:19 AM (r+Jbe)
8
Hi!
My husband and I just found out yesterday.I am really sorry!!! We both know Tyler from Vilseck. He took over my Husbands job as 2/2 Scout Medic. The both of them had served in Kosovo with eachother. My husband is really sad, and so am I. He was a good Person! We're really sorry for his family and wish them only the best !!!!!!!
Posted by: Judith Craig at October 08, 2004 06:24 AM (HIHpb)
9
I am very touched by what you have written about Tyler. Yes, he was a very amazing man. He meant way more to me than many ever knew, maybe even him. I miss him dearly but am so proud of him. I have always appreciated my freedom but now even more: knowing that wonderful people like him are giving their life's for it.
Posted by: Kayla at October 09, 2004 11:28 PM (bjHHc)
10
Tyler was our nephew. We live in Cody, Wyoming,
and have just returned from Tyler's services. Our
whole family appreciates the overwhelming support
that has been shown. Tyler was extremely proud to
be in the military and his whole family was
extremely proud of him. We will miss him.
Posted by: Ray and Stephanie Stockhill at October 10, 2004 09:44 PM (7Z5Vz)
11
I knew Tyler since I was in the 8th grade and he was in 7th. Though I did not know him that well until after highschool I will always remember his great personality, goofy sense of humor and awesome laugh! I attended his funeral services and was very touched, especially by the video at the end. The song "Proud to be an American" now has greater meaning to me than it ever has. "And I am proud to be an American where at least I know I am free, and I wont forget the men who died who gave that right to me". Tyler I wont forget. Thank you for your sacrafice.
Posted by: Sarah Freswick at October 11, 2004 07:45 PM (rxlLT)
12
www. geocities.com/sgt_tylerprewitt
Posted by: Chris Primerano at October 13, 2004 06:17 PM (OMDE4)
13
I was stationed in Germany with TP, TP, myself and our other friend Luke were always together. I will never forget the way he laughed, and all the other funny thigs he did. I just wanted everyone to know that Luke and I are taking care of eachother through these hard times. We will never forget TP. I Love You Tyler.
SPC Roger Jones
Posted by: Roger Jones at October 25, 2004 07:53 AM (tVaRJ)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
THE BANNER?
After having finished re-reading
The Fountainhead, this story -- a newspaper editor going against public opinion -- made me chuckle. I had to register to read it, so now you don't have to.
Crawford wants newspaper to eat its words
Rebeca Rodriguez
San Antonio Express-News
CRAWFORD — Photos of President Bush hugging diners and mugging for the camera adorn the walls of the Crawford Coffee Station, a popular cafe in this small Central Texas town Bush calls home.
Just a few miles from the Bush ranch, the spot is a popular place for locals to gather in the morning for coffee, breakfast and a glance at the day's news.
But the rack that once held the Lone Star Iconoclast — Crawford's weekly newspaper — now is empty, thanks to a blistering indictment in Tuesday's paper of Bush's presidential record and a call to elect Democrat John Kerry in November.
For a town drenched in Bush, the editorial is practically political heresy.
"Not only is he the president of the United States, he's my neighbor, he's my customer," Coffee Station owner Nick Spanos said. "We're not carrying that paper after today."
The firestorm began Tuesday morning, when readers opened up the newspaper to Page 2 and found an entire half-page criticizing the president for a variety of failings, and calling for the election of Kerry.
By the afternoon, news of the editorial was burning up Internet blogs and e-mail boxes all over the country.
Iconoclast publisher W. Leon Smith, who co-wrote the editorial with two other writers, is unapologetic.
"We're just trying to point out the direction the country's going in, and it's not good," he said.
Smith is majority owner of the Iconoclast, the Record of nearby Clifton and the Bosque Globe. He's also the mayor of Clifton and a Democrat who was defeated twice in campaigns for the Texas House of Representatives.
Now, Smith has become an iconoclast in his own right, challenging the widely declared belief that Crawford and its environs are "Bush Country."
[snip]
As of Wednesday morning, more than a dozen readers had canceled their subscription and six advertisers had pulled their spots from the paper.
Smith expects there will be more, and he's preparing for the worst.
"It will probably put us under," he said.
Smith's desk at the Record offices is piled with paper, and his cubicle is filled with Mickey Mouse paraphernalia — two clocks, posters and even his computer screensaver.
He pulled up his computer e-mail inbox, filled with messages of varying intensity.
Smith said about 75 percent of them applaud the editorial, but the remaining fourth border on vitriol.
"It really appears to be me that we no longer live in an open society," he said. "When you get to the point where you can't express an opinion, then you're in trouble."
I really hate when people pull the "police state" b.s. when their opinion is unpopular. You can write whatever you want in your newspaper, dude. People don't have to pay to read it if they don't like it though. That's not crushing dissent; that's the textbook definition of an "open society". In an open society, people disagree. And they vote with their wallet. If you "go under" because of this editorial, then you need to reevaluate your priorities. Either you give the people what they want in Crawford and make money, or you stand up for your principles and "go under" if that's in the cards. But don't complain that American society is in danger because people don't want to give you money to stand on your soapbox and say things they disagree with.
Long live capitalism!
(thanks to Dagney's Rant for the heads up...and the continued Ayn Rand connection)
Posted by: Sarah at
04:27 AM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 624 words, total size 4 kb.
Posted by: Kalroy at October 02, 2004 06:35 AM (VU2TV)
2
>"It really appears to be me that we no longer
>live in an open society," he said. "When you get
>to the point where you can't express an opinion,
>then you're in trouble."
I suppose Mr. Big-time Newspaper Editor thinks it's unfortunate that the "local yokels" also get to express THEIR opinions. Elitists... faugh!
Posted by: CavalierX at October 02, 2004 01:09 PM (sA6XT)
3
It is one thing if consumers, decide not to purchase a product of their own volition (as appears the case with individual customers of the newspaper).
To decide to not carry this paper, when part of your business is selling news papers smacks of organized censorship. If the proprietor of the shop had waited until he had of a couple of days of unsold papers then I have no problem. It appears though that he decided to not carry the paper the moment he finished the editorial. Small minded fool is what he seems to be to me. That is just my opinion, I could be wrong
Posted by: Bubba Bo Bob Brain at October 02, 2004 09:58 PM (4pVZJ)
4
Suppose I'm a Kerry supporter. Then suppose that some paper runs an offensive anti-Kerry cartoon (you can imagine the details yourself). What if I refuse to sell the paper anymore? Is that "censorship"? How is the decision of an *individual* "organized censorship"? It's not as if I (or the actual person in the real-life example above) were part of a nationwide organized movement to stop selling papers that offend us. And even if I were part of an organized movement, so what? Are we *obligated* to sell anti-Kerry propaganda?
Posted by: Amritas at October 03, 2004 07:33 AM (ftznT)
5
Amritas, you may not have read/understood what I wrote completely.
I did say I have no problem if you wait for a couple days papers to pile up before dropping it from your store. To do so immediately after reading an editorial you don't like is akin to organizing a censorship drive. Just my opinion, I could be wrong.
Posted by: Bubba Bo Bob Brain at October 03, 2004 10:49 AM (4pVZJ)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
INGRAINED
I love when the bias is so ingrained that people can't even see it. My German co-worker said yesterday that the German media was reporting that Kerry had won the debate. I said that I hadn't seen the program, but that everything I had read had called it a draw. I said that people who like Bush generally gave him the edge, while people who like Kerry said that he had won. She said that Germany didn't really have a preference in the American presidential election, so they were just reporting objectively. I wanted to laugh my fool head off, but instead I casually mentioned the
polls that show overwhelming German support for Kerry. And I printed
this out for her. How can she not see the elephant in the room that is Europe's love for Kerry?
Posted by: Sarah at
02:33 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 139 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Makes sense to me. The Eurotrash prefer good debaters to good soldiers. That is why the UN is the world's biggest debating society, and the world's least useful institution!
Posted by: Tanker Schreiber at October 02, 2004 01:29 PM (ejMHq)
2
Your point about the Germans is probably true, but not proven in this case -- because the President did lose the debate.
Posted by: Herostratus at October 03, 2004 02:30 AM (ygBH5)
3
It's not a matter of who won or lost, but what was said. I find the words, "global test" before we can defend America to be truly frightening. Those two words signify the death of America, and in that regard Kerry might have won for himself in the debate, but it also means America will be the loser in the end. So it isn't a battle between Bush and Kerry, but a battle between Kerry and America.
Posted by: Moor at October 03, 2004 01:54 PM (g8OfD)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
October 01, 2004
VOTING
I received two absentee ballots from the state of Missouri. One is a federal write-in ballot, which I received two months ago, and one has the actual bubbles you fill in, which I received this week. I don't understand why I got both of them. I wonder what would happen if I were a bad person and filled out both of them. Would Missouri catch the mistake? Would my vote count twice? Are there more people out there who received two ballots, people who don't have the "voting integrity" I have? Just wondering...
Posted by: Sarah at
05:32 AM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
Post contains 95 words, total size 1 kb.
1
When I lived in Missouri I believe you were allow three votes--but only if you were registered Democrat.
Posted by: Mike at October 01, 2004 07:20 AM (MqNKC)
2
If it's a St. Louis area ballot, just give one to a dog. They love dog votes here.
Posted by: fad at October 01, 2004 10:54 AM (R+jlL)
3
Sarah,
I'm in Iowa with a husband in Afganistan. I don't know if the laws are the same in MO or not, but I asked this same question of our county elections office.
I was told that if they received both ballots back in time for the election, that only the printed ballot would be counted.
The write in ballot can be sent out much earlier than the actual printed ballot. Since our state ballots were only mailed out last week..and it's taking a full 3-4 weeks for mail to be received at my husbands firebase..he's already sent the write in..and when he receives the state ballot he'll send that so his vote will also count in our local elections..but it's highly doubtful that he'll receive it in a timely manner.
Since the declaration envelopes are numbered by the county and signed by the voter, I have no doubt that it will be caught by my very small county. Who knows if it would be caught in a larger county.
Posted by: Tink at October 01, 2004 02:19 PM (S6VXg)
4
Tink, thank you for the information. I hope that it doesn't lead to multiple votes for people!
Posted by: Sarah at October 01, 2004 06:05 PM (/KC96)
5
I've forwarded this information to the Federal Election Commission and to the DNC as well.
I don't know that it will do any good but we all have to keep our eyes peeled for another Republican attempt to steal the election.
Thanks for the heads up Sara.
Posted by: dc at October 02, 2004 01:28 AM (s6c4t)
6
Hey, it's no problem, dc. Since the Democrats don't generally like counting military absentee ballots, I'm sure it will all even out in the end. [/sarcasm] Asshole.
Posted by: Sarah at October 02, 2004 02:21 AM (7bK6S)
7
Sarah,
No problem..I understand your concern, I had the same concern, which is why I contacted the elections board.
The official hadn't run into this issue before (like I said, small county, and 2 hours from the nearest base)so she literally read the information to me, and then called back later and verified that she had given me the correct info.
Since the declarations envelope is numbered by the county (and each ballot has to be accounted for), then addressed, signed, and if it's your first time voting absentee, a copy of either an ID, utility bill, or one of several other specific pieces of identification, they are able to verify that only one ballot is counted, and they insure that members of the military are able to be heard in an election. With so many deployed, and with it taking mail so long to reach remote bases, it could really be an issue in this election.
(and maybe next time I comment, I won't typo Afghanistan)
dc said:
"I've forwarded this information to the Federal Election Commission and to the DNC as well.
I don't know that it will do any good but we all have to keep our eyes peeled for another Republican attempt to steal the election. "
dc,
A) My husband and I are both Independents.
B) It wasn't the Republicans who tried to have military absentee ballots thrown out in the last election.
Posted by: Tink at October 02, 2004 02:39 AM (S6VXg)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
SCREED
I really want to know what happened during the debates last night!
Lileks gave me a good taste to start out with...
HereÂ’s the thing. IÂ’d really like to live in John KerryÂ’s world. It seems like such a rational, sensible place, where handshakes and signatures have the power to change the face of the planet. If only the terrorists lived there as well.
Hey, Blue 6. If you have time, I think you might like this one.
Posted by: Sarah at
03:14 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 80 words, total size 1 kb.
1
The debate last night was pretty much a draw. Which I see as a win for the President, he was leading going in and Kerry really didn't say anything that isn't already known. Even by the undecideds. If there is really anybody still undecided at this point I just don't know what to make of them. What are they waiting for?
Kerry really made an effort to look good for last night, his hair was darker, his complexion less orange, and his nails were manicured. I think he really believes that appearance is important. The last time there was a debate on foriegn affairs was the Kennedy/Nixon debate and the consensus is
that Nixon lost because he looked so bad. So Kerry made sure he looked good for the cameras. I do get an image of him as pres. getting his nails done while the country is falling apart or maybe I'm just a right wing wacko looking for anything to help my guy:->
Vodkapundit drunk blogged it and several others live blogged it and all of the usual suspects have an abundance of debate detail on their blogs. So you should be able to get up to speed pretty quickly. Someone is even linking a transcript of the debate, it might be LGF, but it will probably make your head explode if you try to read it.
BTW, do the right thing with the extra ballot. I'd rather lose than win crooked. Character is what you do when nobody is looking:-)
God bless you and yours.
Posted by: Pamela at October 01, 2004 02:38 PM (50GlF)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
ALLY
I'd like to wish Tony Blair a speedy recovery for his
surgery. Hurry back, friend! We need you in this fight!
Posted by: Sarah at
02:59 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 23 words, total size 1 kb.
1
As much as I distrust the guy and hate his domestic policies, I'd have to agree with you. He's the best of a bundle of bad choices, and we need him for the next couple of years - unless, of course, Baroness Thatcher decides to come out of retirement...
Posted by: Dominic at October 01, 2004 06:10 AM (pqgq+)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
76kb generated in CPU 0.0205, elapsed 0.0928 seconds.
55 queries taking 0.0808 seconds, 249 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.