October 22, 2004
WEARY
"I canÂ’t wait to get this election behind me, so I can go on with my life."
Let's knock this crap off that "this is the most important election in our lifetimes"; they are all important. Just vote. Do a reasonably good job of knowing the issues, accept people who take a different view than you and then go take up rock polishing or go knit sweaters for the other 23 months in between the election season. Let's all go find a hobbies to keep us busy for Gods' sake.
Do blankets count? I've knitted a couple of those lately.
Posted by: Sarah at
05:15 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 102 words, total size 1 kb.
R&R
My husband's best friend is on R&R now, so I got to call him in NY and talk for a while yesterday. He's doing really well and is having a wonderful time. He said everyone was really nice in the airports and that he's so happy to be home. He's already seen
Team America too! I asked him a lot of questions about how it feels to be away from the responsibility of being PL, if his time feels like it's going fast or slow, and whether he's paying any attention to the news while he's home. I told him about my election fears, and he laughed at me. He's confident as all get-out right now, and he teased me about being so freaked out. I sure do hope he's right.
Posted by: Sarah at
04:51 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 133 words, total size 1 kb.
SUPERMAN'S ORIGIN
The wealth of knowledge that's out there is one of the things I love about the blogosphere.
Smash asks a question about Arabic, and a reader responds. I mention a fallen Soldier, and his friends and family all add their thoughts. And I ask for
help on superheroes, and a faithful reader comes to my rescue:
Although Nietzsche invented the word "Übermensch," it's a word, not a character. Superman's creators Siegel and Shuster were not educated men, so it's unlikely that they knew much about Nietzsche.
OTOH, it is highly likely that Siegel and Shuster were heavily influenced by a 1930 Philip Wylie novel called GLADIATOR:
"The parallels are obvious: Both Hugo Danner and Clark Kent grow up in rural small-town America, possessing powers far beyond the common mortal; both are imbued, from an early age, with a profound sense of fairness and justice; and they hide their respective secrets from the world at large. The resemblance is even more obvious when you consider the original 1930s conception of Superman [which was far weaker than later incarnations of the character]. Their powers are the same: great strength, skin so tough that it can withstand just about anything short of an explosive artillery shell, and the ability to jump so high and so far that it almost gives the impression of flight. And both, despite their superhuman status, espouse a political philosophy that celebrates the common human being over capitalist elites."
[The early Superman has been described as a super-FDR - a costumed socialist activist. This political aspect was gone by the time the character attained iconic status in the 40s.]
Nonetheless, the superhero concept as we know it today was invented by Siegel and Shuster. The individual ingredients (superpowers, costume, secret identity) had all been done before, but it was S&S that combined them into a whole greater than the sum of its parts. Some claim that gods and demigod heroes like Hercules were the first "superheroes," but they lack the total package embodied by Superman.
There's a new book that I'm going to try to buy ASAP, MEN OF TOMORROW, that goes into detail about the birth of the superhero genre. What excites me about the book is that it's the first history of comics to look into the Jewish roots of the majority of American superhero creators. The children of Yiddish-speaking immigrants created icons for all Americans - and the world. The Nazis hated the American Superman because he was the creation of Jews.
Posted by: Sarah at
02:22 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 381 words, total size 3 kb.
1
One interesting item of note. One of the members of the Fantastic Four (Ben Grimm AKA The Thing) which started its run in 1961 was fairly recently identified as being Jewish..
http://encyclopedia.thefreedictionary.com/Ben%20Grimm
Posted by: LarryConley at October 22, 2004 04:53 PM (2cE9S)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
YAY
My husband is the
happiest man in Iraq right now.
MORE TO GROK:
My mother-in-law emailed a Cardinals representative last week and the woman called her back. They talked a bit, and then the woman passed on the fact that there are two brothers in Iraq who are definitely rooting for the Cards. Legend has it that Pujols said that he would hit a homer for the boys...and his first at bat was a homer. Not too shabby.
Posted by: Sarah at
02:10 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 80 words, total size 1 kb.
PHONY
Once again, where's the character from Family Guy? "John Kerry is a
great big phony!"
Posted by: Sarah at
01:42 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 17 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I honestly laugh everytime I see him in a Carhartt jacket, of course he only does that in rural states.
Yeah Bubba, you just came in from mucking stalls...
Sheesh
Posted by: Tink at October 22, 2004 03:06 AM (S6VXg)
2
He looks so stupid. I've probably killed more birds than him....and I've only been hunting twice! What a fake...
Posted by: Erin at October 22, 2004 05:45 PM (AgmLR)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
WIFE
A girl I know found out three days before our husbands left that she was pregnant. She just gave birth to a little baby boy last week. An entire person has gestated in the time that our Soldiers have been away from home.
My husband has been at war for over nine months.
Last night I watched Courage Under Fire again. I haven't seen it since that day in ROTC, and I was reminded of what drew me to the movie in the first place: it was the day I knew I wanted to be an Army wife. I wanted to take care of a Soldier, through good times and bad, and support him as he served our great country. I wanted to try my best to be a combat multiplier during difficult times and to do my small part to sacrifice for what I believe in. I figured I could do a better job than Denzel's wife in the movie.
Of course, I already had my Soldier picked out.
Truthfully, these nine months have been surprisingly fast and relatively painlessly. There are times that are nervewracking and times that are lonely, but for the most part the deployment has been easier than I expected. Of course, the fact that I support the mission has been a big help: I suppose being a war cheerleader is a good quality when your husband is at war.
There's a nasty rumor going around that my husband is coming home on R&R sometime next week. I won't believe it until I catch a whiff of motor pool and Iraq funk in our home, but I've started getting emotionally ready for his visit. I'm anxious to catch up on the last nine months of his life, for conversations have been few and far between. I'm ready to put my combat multiplier skills back to use in a face-to-face setting.
I hope my husband gives me a good NCOER.
Posted by: Sarah at
12:29 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 326 words, total size 2 kb.
1
I too have been in your shoes when 1st Armored Division deployed to Iraq 2003/2004, my husband was gone for 14 months. I'd be lying if I said that it was easy, but I have to say that it wasn't as hard as I expected. I just had to get my "game" head on and keep on moving from one day until the next. I think your attitude is great, and hope that you're sharing it with others around you that are having a harder time. I'll be keeping my fingers crossed that your husband gets to come home on R&R, and if he does enjoy every minute of it.
Posted by: Jamie at October 22, 2004 02:35 AM (na4nh)
2
Mine left 10 days after yours. 240 days, 12 hours and 56 minutes.
I do fine most of the time, but I get stupid when I hear of casualties in the province that his platoon is in..then I stop sleeping and freak out when a car I don't know comes up the driveway. Once it was the Sheriff's dept..turned out the neighbors cow was out.
He was home last month, he didn't tell me until he was already in route. Why do they think surprising us is a good thing? LOL
It was great to have him home, and hard to send him back. I did fine for about 4 days after he left, then it was tough for several days.
Fair warning, let him open his own dang duffle..OUTSIDE, mine has no access to laundry..they are washing in buckets..so those dcu's smelled really REALLY bad. I think he took 4 showers his first day home.
Sadly, mine is no longer regular Army, he's Guard, so we're only halfway at this point. IF they are not extended, they'll be home early June.
Keep on keeping on Sarah, you're doing great. If that "nasty" rumor is true, enjoy yourself, spoil the heck out of him, and give him my thanks.
Posted by: Tink at October 22, 2004 04:17 AM (S6VXg)
3
You have been amazing during this deployment. Absolutely amazing.
I will cross everything I can, send good thoughts and prayers that sometime next week you'll have your Military Man home to spoil and talk with. That would be a very very good thing.
Posted by: Tammi at October 22, 2004 08:02 AM (UOdfZ)
4
Wow - I can't believe it that 9 mos are gone since he left. Easy for me to say! Seriously though you appear (from this monitor-heheh) to have fared pretty well so far. Hope he will be home. ENJOY
Posted by: Toni at October 22, 2004 08:58 AM (SHqVu)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
October 21, 2004
LINKS
My email is really backed up, so I'm wading through all of the links.
American Student Hides Support for Bush
I feel so sorry for that girl.
Get Out the military vote — now
I keep calling MO and my husband's absentee ballot still hasn't arrived. The woman who works in the office has been great, and we've been discussing different options to make sure that he can vote. But I'm getting nervous!
Pessimistic Kerry supporters predict Bush will be the victor
I hope these people are right!
Posted by: Sarah at
08:39 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 90 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Went to the Orthopaedic Surgeon's office Wednesday, finished Franks's "American Soldier" while waiting. A couple with their college-age daughter were there (the daughter looks to already (!!) have a lower herniated disc), and I ran into them in the parking lot later, and saw the young lady's car with pro-Bush stickers, &c we got into a conversation, and she related how lonely it was attending a "liberal arts" college in this mid-Missouri city--the glares, stares, and overt hostility she experiences.
I see a few Kedwards bumper stickers on vehicles and hardhats at work, but I see an equal number of "Union Member for Bush" style stickers also.
Am proud of you, Sarah--keep on Russell's absentee ballot! (although it looks like W has Missouri).
Jim
Posted by: Jim Shawley at October 21, 2004 11:53 PM (PjHUb)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
October 20, 2004
SUPERHEROES
I finally got to see
Spiderman 2 tonight. I loved it.
The scene in the subway train was one of the most moving things I've seen in a long time.
To me, there's nothing more American than a superhero, an ordinary man in extraordinary circumstances who struggles to do what's right no matter what the cost. Superman is of course my favorite, but Spiderman is very dear to my heart as well. I'm ignorant as to the origins of the comic book superheroes; maybe some of my comic-knowing readers can help me: are superheroes American in origin?
I will be surprised if they aren't.
Posted by: Sarah at
04:50 PM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 106 words, total size 1 kb.
1
The idea of "superman" comes from the German philosopher Frederich Nietzsche. Read his work "Man and Superman" for details.
Posted by: Bubba Bo Bob Brain at October 21, 2004 12:28 AM (4pVZJ)
2
But are you sure that Nietzsche's superman is where Siegel and Shuster got the idea for Superman? I don't know; I haven't read up on it.
Posted by: Sarah at October 21, 2004 01:43 AM (ptNm2)
3
Superman was "an undocumented worker" or an illegal alien... from another planet....
Spiderman was American...
I think most all the bad guys were from somewhere else though....
Posted by: Madfish Willie at October 21, 2004 04:20 AM (usnuR)
4
i know that wasn't your actual question... just my really lame attempt to be funny....
Posted by: Madfish Willie at October 21, 2004 04:21 AM (usnuR)
5
Superman was more a childhood refugee than an 'an undocumented worker'. He was sent alone by his parents before their home world was destroyed.
Nietzsche was a crank.
Posted by: John at October 21, 2004 05:21 AM (crTpS)
6
I think, though I could be mistaken, that the Superhero as we understand it today is an American invention. Some people draw parallels with the Demigods of ancient myth (Hercules, etc.), but the true "superhero" is American. (While Nietzche may have inspired Superman's name, he wasn't thinking of a superhero when he wrote.)
Posted by: Robin Sizemore at October 21, 2004 11:24 PM (FKTyo)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
YUCK
My husband just pointed out
this new Onion article.
He wasn't that amused. "I get the parody," he said, "but it's a little sensitive for me."
I thought it was in appallingly bad taste.
Posted by: Sarah at
12:27 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 36 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I agree...and "apalling" is an understatement. I truly hope no soldiers were hurt or killed in the photo on page 2.
Posted by: beckie at October 20, 2004 03:39 PM (L5LRS)
2
Extremely snarky, and in extremely poor taste. I'm guessing that none of the staff at the Onion are veterans. I'm also betting that none of them have friends or family in the military. I used to really enjoy their articles, but in the last 6 months or so, they've pretty much just become shills for the DNC. That's okay, we've still got Team America.
Posted by: Chadd at October 20, 2004 06:00 PM (oJZdw)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
October 19, 2004
FEAR
I'm still upset from
earlier today. I tried to read about the laser beam and refocus, but I just couldn't do it. Part of the reason is because I'm worried about our country's laser beam.
I haven't allowed myself to get confident about the election. In fact, I'm pretty freaking scared. I don't care about what the polls say; I'm freaked out about what happens on 2 November. I keep thinking about what Whittle said:
I fear the consequences of abandoning personal responsibility. I fear the self-hatred and nihilism that grows among the pampered, the narcissistic and the uninformed. These are things to be feared greatly. They have brought down entire civilizations and led to dark ages that have cost this species very dearly. I think we stand at such a point today, and this election -- win or lose -- will not determine the outcome...although it might give us some indication of how sick or healthy we are at this pivotal moment in history.
I fear that my blog-reading has insulated me from just how sick our country is right now. I surround myself with informed people who understand that we're in a post-9/11 world, so I was completely taken aback when someone spouted DU-esque nonsense about how the war in Iraq is a distraction (oh wait, that's not just from the DU; the Democrat candidate says the same thing.) And I'm afraid that there are a lot more like that out there.
And I have seen the eternal Idiotarian hold my coat, and snicker,
And in short, I was afraid.
We need to win this election. I know our country has survived worse, but we are at a crossroads and we need to take the right path. I'm not confident at all that we will. I hope I'm wrong.
Posted by: Sarah at
04:00 PM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 303 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Now how many people paraphrase Prufrock in a blog? Not many, I tell you.
Posted by: CavalierX at October 19, 2004 10:26 PM (sA6XT)
2
I too am very concerned, Sarah. I attend a typical Southern Baptist church in southwest Missouri, and interacting with some local college students who attend church there also, I am most distressed: Several expressed apathy over who ought to be our C-in-C; many STILL hadn't registered! (And of course, it's too late now.)
Another point: I, like most evangelicals, believe in the resurrection of the dead; indeed, I predict that the biblical "rapture" will occur on November 2--at least in Saint Louis, MO. (as it always does on election day). Seems the dead, they rise every time we here in Missouri hold an election--and (as you remember, being registered here in MO yourself), we have even voted a deceased man to the Senate!
THAT is what I really fear--dead people voting, dogs voting, cats voting, fictitious people voting, illegal aliens voting. As Peggy Noonan just voiced on Hannity & Colmes, that kind of fraud is treasonous.
If Kerry wins fair and square (he doesn't even have to win the popular--the electoral vote will suffice), so be it; we will have gotten the president we deserve. But if all those fraudulent means above sway the vote, then I weep for this, our nation.
Posted by: Jim Shawley at October 19, 2004 11:15 PM (wyxEQ)
3
Like you,I fear for our country when I see and hear some of the things that supposedly intelligent people spout. But there is hope. My mother, a southern yellow dog Democrat, has been seriously studying many issues and it looks like she has decided that Bush will be better for the country. Maybe there are more like her. That's one of the things I pray for. I also pray for our country, our leaders, our troops, and you and your husband. God Bless.
Posted by: Pamela at October 20, 2004 01:13 PM (AOFgp)
4
P.S.
I've been reading your blog for several weeks. I found it through a link from another blog (I think it started with Michelle Malkins blog). I have really enjoyed reading here. I sympathize with your tilt to the right and your lose of friends because of it. I have friends and family I can not even have a conversation with anymore (sigh). As for your blog reading insulating you from the sickies out there; start with Moveon.org and follow some of thier links. Yikes, will that ever bring you up to speed on the raving moonbats:-) Keep up the good work!
Posted by: Pamela at October 20, 2004 01:22 PM (AOFgp)
5
Hang in there. Lincoln was convinced he would lose in 1864. It will be close, But Bush will prevail.
Posted by: Tanker Schreiber at October 20, 2004 03:21 PM (X3jxj)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
LT A
If you're interested, here's a
long article on LT A. (Recap: LT A is our friend who was seriously injured in Mosul in August.)
MORE TO GROK:
I printed out this article at work and mentioned to my co-workers how amazing I thought it was that LT A intends to stay in the Army despite his injuries. They retorted that he must be really brainwashed, that he wasn't "fighting for his country" but for lies, and that someday I would see just how brainwashed people like my husband really are. I had to leave the office, I was so disgusted. I can't believe someone would say that to my face, completely unprovoked. I'm proud of our friend for standing up for what he believes in; if they disagree, they can politely nod and keep their opinions to themselves, like I do all the freaking time here at work. What is wrong with these people?
Sigh. Luckily Scott Ott and Varifrank brought a smile back to my face.
MORE:
Nope, still seething over an hour later. Where's the puppy photo?
Posted by: Sarah at
07:35 AM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
Post contains 183 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: John at October 19, 2004 08:54 AM (crTpS)
2
Sarah -
Had to delete all of my post & got this msg?
Posted by: Toni at October 19, 2004 09:11 AM (SHqVu)
3
Couldn't include the msg.... :-)
Posted by: Toni at October 19, 2004 09:12 AM (SHqVu)
4
Hmmm...I had the same problem on Mudville Gazette today. I blame Bush.
Posted by: Sarah at October 19, 2004 09:14 AM (r4xc1)
5
I am constantly amazed at the behavior of some people.
Sarah, what it boils down to is if you've never felt passion for something or someone you just don't get it. If you've never believed in a cause you'll never understand loyalty.
I know it doesn't really help, but.....it's just their ignorance talking. It shows the holes in their lives.
Anymore, with all that's flying around over politics and the war - when someone pulls a stunt like that I just simply tell them I'm sorry they haven't had the chance to really LIVE and that someday the will recognize their ignorance. Then walk away.
(and yes, I really do crap like that - it always leaves them speechless and makes them think twice before they start in the next time, if there is a next time).
Posted by: Tammi at October 19, 2004 09:31 AM (UOdfZ)
6
I'm with Tammi. The criticism people level at others often reflect fundamental truths about themselves. I would bet that the people making these comments are people who wouldn't take a courageous stand or put themselves on the line for any cause whatsoever...and hence, can't understand such actions in others.
Posted by: David Foster at October 19, 2004 08:39 PM (XUtCY)
7
I've been getting my comments rejected. It says this:
Your comment submission failed for the following reasons:
Your comment could not be submitted due to questionable content: men
Please correct the error in the form below, then press Post to post
your comment.
Not sure where it found 'men' in the 2nd comment in regards to LT A.
But, what I was attempting to comment was that you should tell them
that they are projecting their own weaknesses onto others when they
claim brainwashing.
Two questions I would like to ask them:
Is there anything at all worth fighting for?
Most will give you a no answer. Then ask:
Would you die to protect your children? (if they have any, substitute
any family if not)
If they say yes, tell them that those who die for others (strangers)
are less self-centered and are much more advanced
morally/intellectually than they are.
Heaven forfend they answer no to both, anyone who does is truely
morally bankrupt and not worth listening to, or wasting breath on.
And remember, LT A is protecting them as well as you and me.
John
Posted by: John at October 20, 2004 06:52 AM (QVbZ/)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
SPIRIT
Baldilocks gives more examples of those who are Americans in spirit and those whose spirits are unaffiliated.
Posted by: Sarah at
06:07 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 19 words, total size 1 kb.
NO HOOAH?
All I wanted to say in response to
Greyhawk's vote was HOOAH, but his comments section wouldn't allow it! Now that's a glitch worth looking into: a milblog where you can't say hooah...
Posted by: Sarah at
04:06 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 37 words, total size 1 kb.
HEH
Is it just me, or does
this look like it could be the cover of an REM album?
Posted by: Sarah at
03:59 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 20 words, total size 1 kb.
October 18, 2004
WOW
As I read this article (via
Powerline) about
high school textbook bias, I was reminded of the times I've written about my
own textbook. And I remembered something I meant to blog about last week.
Chapter 13: Classification/Division starts with Act 2 from Shakespeare's As You Like It, the "all the world's a stage" monologue. The following is a "question on meaning and technique":
4. What characteristics typify the soldier? Are these characteristics typical of soldiers today? Why or why not?
OK, here's what Shakespeare wrote:
Then a soldier,
Full of strange oaths and bearded like the 'pard,
Jealous in honour, sudden and quick in quarrel,
Seeking the bubble reputation
Even in the cannon's mouth.
Maybe someone else can help me decipher that, because I am not completely sure what the heck the old bard was saying. I've never been a huge Shakespeare fan. The reason I even stumbled across this question is because I absentmindedly flipped open the instructor's manual during breakfast last week and found the jaw-dropper sample response to what typifies a soldier. This is the instructor's manual answer to question #4:
The soldier is swaggeringly masculine, wearing a bristly beard and uttering swear words. He is also ambitious to earn some honor on the battlefield, even if doing so means death. Yes, soldiers today--especially regiments like the marines--are seen as having considerable "machismo." However, many young people today hate the army because it represents war, which is no longer a chance for honor but rather for annihilation of the human race.
You have to learn to laugh at stuff like that...otherwise you'll cry your eyes out.
I hate this f-ing textbook.
Posted by: Sarah at
01:51 PM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 277 words, total size 2 kb.
1
I've never enjoyed reading his plays, but I've always enjoyed seeing them performed.
Posted by: Mike at October 18, 2004 03:22 PM (ckYKs)
2
I've offen wondered where & for what university you teach. I'm even MORE concerned now that my soldier daughter will be taking some English classes in Germany (through Univ. of Md.). If she were to read the passage "
he soldier is swaggeringly masculine, wearing a bristly beard and uttering swear words" I think she would tear up the textbook & try to sue the publisher for slander!
Posted by: beckie at October 18, 2004 03:39 PM (hoo48)
3
"Offen??" I wrote "offen???" I meant "often."
Good grief...I MUST learn to proofread a wee bit better in the future! Please don't fail me yet.
Posted by: beckie at October 18, 2004 03:45 PM (hoo48)
4
It all depends on how you want to see it:
Then a soldier,
Full of strange oaths and bearded like the 'pard,
"Bearded", okay; "Strange oaths"- to many the concepts of honor, duty, and loyalty would be strange...
"Jealous in honour",- Not jealous OF honour, but protective of that which he has.
"sudden and quick in quarrel"- Again, not quick TO quarrel, but if you're in a quarrel/battle, you damn sure want someone that is "sudden and quick", as in effective.
"Seeking the bubble reputation
Even in the cannon's mouth."
My read on this is: Seeking Fame in the Face of Death- quite acceptable in the time this was written. For a different take on "bubble reputation" see:
www.iwvpa.net/earsmanpw/bubble.htm
Yeah, the talking points in your "teacher's" manual make me ill, but I wouldn't expect much different. I can only say that the sailors and soldiers I've met and served with mostly chose to do what they do out of a love of country. A lot of people just don't get that, and there is zero point in trying to explain it to them.
Posted by: Jack Grey at October 20, 2004 10:26 PM (3nn57)
5
We see from the passage that the excerpt is only describing one stage of the life of a man.
Then a soldier,
Full of strange oaths and bearded like the pard,
Full of strange oaths, speaks to me of being travelled and knowledgeable of the foreign. Language, culture, etc.... Been there, done that.
Pard? Leopard if I don't miss my guess. Lethal and swift, hungry and lean.
Jealous in honor, sudden and quick in quarrel,
Jealous in honor, seeking to achieve renown? I think this is a bit off, most veterans I know might have wanted renown before going to war, but are quite circumspect after returning. Historically that might have been the case, but humility is a much more common trait in the modern age. Sudden and quick in quarrel however, describes quite a few soldiers I've known. But not the whole of them, yet still part of the territory of being a soldier.
Seeking the bubble reputation
Even in the cannon's mouth.
Bubble reputation, short lived and fleeting, even when found in death.
So what we have is a description of a man who has become a soldier as part of his life. He is well travelled and knowledgeable about the world beyond his home. He is rough-cut, a formiddable fighter, seeking the glory of battle, even unto death, while holding honor in high esteem.
This seems to me to be not far off from a description of most any soldier from any point in history (voluntary ones anyway, conscripts are a different breed).
The description given in the teaching manual of youth now finding war despicable seems rather vacant and unrelated to the question, or being
a soldier, as any youth so described would not make that choice.
Posted by: John at October 21, 2004 08:38 AM (2RL68)
6
Well, I can certainly help you with that Shakespeare quote. Let's go through it very quickly- the best way to deal with Shakespeare; if you think about it too long, you forget how funny he is.
Full of strange oaths and bearded like the 'pard,
He cusses profusely and creatively, and has a shaggy beard. (look up a leopard if you want to see where the 'pard comes from. They have shaggy, distinguished beards.)
Jealous in honour, sudden and quick in quarrel,
Quick to take offense and to pick fights.
Seeking the bubble reputation
Seeking renown, no matter how fleeting; even if it only lasts as long as a soap bubble, he wants it.
Even in the cannon's mouth.
He wants it so bad, in fact, he will go out onto a a battlefield and do stupid, heroic things. (thus his being a soldier)
hope this helped ya!
Posted by: Siphos at June 24, 2005 05:40 AM (pMpWm)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
DONE
My stats class is officially over. Contrary to internet prediction, I kicked ass.
My test scores: 98, 96, 93, and 96%.
And I still don't have any faith in opinion polling.
Posted by: Sarah at
01:20 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 33 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I always have to stop and think what the heck "rejecting the null hypothesis" is really all about. It's nearly the equivalent of a question loaded with a double negative.
"Are you not sure that you won't vote for Bush?"
Congrats on the exams!
Posted by: Curtis at October 18, 2004 01:52 PM (O1ypm)
2
I don't think any of us doubted you!
Posted by: Mike at October 18, 2004 03:20 PM (ckYKs)
3
There was never a doubt. We knew you'd do great!
(btw - Stats was my favorite and I don't have any faith in the polls either)
Posted by: Tammi at October 18, 2004 09:04 PM (UOdfZ)
4
Nice Stats!
Congratulations.
Posted by: Stephen Macklin at October 18, 2004 10:18 PM (U3CvV)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
WEIRD
I went to Poland on Saturday. At one store, they were selling commemorative plates with George Bush and John Kerry on them, for some bizarre reason. One of them will be worth bupkis in a few weeks.
We also had a comical moment when we tried to go to a Polish grocery store. Apparently you can't go into the store carrying any bags, because a security guard came chasing after us as soon as we walked in. As he barked at us, we looked at him and said, "English? Deutsch?" Apparently he didn't speak either, but he decided to help us out by speaking in v-e-r-y slow Polish. Ha.
Posted by: Sarah at
07:15 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 111 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Sarah,
You know when that happened, I realized that I've done that to people who don't speak English. As if speaking slowly is going to make them understand any better! It was pretty funny though. If you didn't look like such a thug, maybe they wouldn't have come after us...
Posted by: Erin at October 18, 2004 02:31 PM (wurkW)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
SURGE
I've heard people scoff at the idea that the terrorists want Kerry to win. Well, here's
interesting take on some people who have been listening to Kerry. (Thanks, Hud.)
Posted by: Sarah at
01:55 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 31 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Ugg ...that's just terrible .
Anyways I'm still following Lt. D I don't know why it is some people just don't leave your mind even tho you've never met them. I'm glad to hear he's doing better . I read a couple news articles on him tonight( This am actually ) there were a few pictures .. He looks like such a wonderful guy . I keep thinking about the power of prayer and will to survive .
I just wanted to let you know I'm still thinking about him and you . God Bless
Posted by: MorningSun at October 18, 2004 05:48 AM (EPBbn)
2
Thanks. I tried to call him recently on his birthday, but I couldn't get through. I need to try again...
Posted by: Sarah at October 18, 2004 06:51 AM (ECh5c)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
93kb generated in CPU 0.0865, elapsed 0.1504 seconds.
61 queries taking 0.1276 seconds, 276 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.