January 06, 2006
AS MANY YEARS AS HE WANTS
Let's hear it for CaliValleyGirl, who lays out the
perfect rant answer to the dreaded question from non-military folks: “So how many more years does he have in?”
You know what? I have no idea how many more years my husband has in. Officers don't have ETS dates really, they stay until they renounce their commission. I know if my husband goes to the career course, he tacks on more time, and since he started taking tuition assistance to get his MBA, he tacked on more time for that as well. But I really have no idea when he could get out of the Army if he wanted it. Some days he fantasizes about getting out and working in the civilian world...other days he fantasizes about retiring as a lieutenant colonel. He's staying in until he doesn't want to do this job anymore.
And I too have heard the "brainwashing" thing, most notably from my German co-worker back when our friend got his torso ripped out in Mosul. Here's what I wrote back in 2004:
I printed out this article at work and mentioned to my co-workers how amazing I thought it was that LT A intends to stay in the Army despite his injuries. They retorted that he must be really brainwashed, that he wasn't "fighting for his country" but for lies, and that someday I would see just how brainwashed people like my husband really are. I had to leave the office, I was so disgusted. I can't believe someone would say that to my face, completely unprovoked. I'm proud of our friend for standing up for what he believes in; if they disagree, they can politely nod and keep their opinions to themselves, like I do all the freaking time here at work. What is wrong with these people?
My husband and I aren't looking any gift horses in the mouth: we know we've got a good thing going here. He makes great money for a 25 year old, plus we pay no rent, no utilities, and have free health care. If he can do better in the future, we'll consider it, but for now we think ourselves pretty darn lucky to have the resources we have.
Brainwashed, indeed.
Posted by: Sarah at
06:07 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 384 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Sarah,
I saw Calivalleygirl's post and was hoping you would post something similar. She totally hit the nail on the head! Since we've been back in the states and have gone home to see old friends and family, we've heard that a zillion times..."how much longer do you have"...wink, wink. Most of my family still cannot understand the difference between officer and enlisted rank so they think he'll be going to the Army office at the mall to "sign-up" again soon. AHH!! It's so frustrating! When I try to explain the situation, they only hear "how much longer now?" The Army is a CAREER...like a doctor, lawyer, CPA, nurse...why can't they understand???
Thanks for your post.
Posted by: Nicole at January 06, 2006 01:55 PM (KJBDI)
2
Sarah...
Your rent, utilities, and health care are anything but FREE...you're earning them as benefits to your husband's service. I find your characterization of them quite refreshing...as I quite often find dependents bashing that they don't get enough. I challenge ANYONE to show me another company in the private sector that pays as much attention to the benefits of their members and those of their families any more than the Department of Defense. (Unfortunately, they tend to focus on the uniformed members, but that's okay. They're the ones that are risking life and limb).
You and your hubby think along the same lines I did while I was in uniform...and probably still do to some extent now that I'm out of it. I'm making a good salary, I've got decent benefits, and I'm doing something that counts!
Thank you for your service in supporting your husband and his dedication to duty!
See you both on the high ground!
MajorDad1984
Posted by: MajorDad1984 at January 07, 2006 10:05 AM (tdEnf)
3
This is an apology for the bad manners shown by idiots who would probably ask rude and stupid questions no matter what the topic.
I'm a leftist, and oppose the Iraq invasion, but I have three extended family members in the service, two of them lifers in the Navy and AF, and one a baby Marine on his third tour of combat duty in Iraq. And another drinking buddy is an retired SeaI. I understand and honor the need for military service (Heinlein's books shaped my thinking there). My family and friends tend to agree about the current situation, because our argument is with the politicians who misuse troops, and an uneducated public that supports bad command decisions.
If it helps any, there are just as many obnoxious comments made on the other side. I wish I had a dime for every unfeeling comment that starts with "everyone who disagrees hates America, isn't a patriot, supports the terrorists," etc.
Funny thing is, those insults usually come from someone who has never put themselves or their family members between the enemy and our beloved home. I've never had my patriotism insulted by a current or former service member. Best to you and yours.
Posted by: Michael Fountain at January 07, 2006 11:33 AM (OQP8X)
4
You go girl!!! I am PROUD to serve. Geez doesn't anyone get this is a VOLUNTEER Army???
Posted by: Sgt Lori at January 13, 2006 02:19 PM (DmF+F)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
December 31, 2005
ALREADY POLICY
Victor Davis Hanson's newest gem is called
Democratic Implosion. The part that resonated with me:
Despite the stentorian intonation, KerryÂ’s new suggestions for what to do in Iraq simply outlined what the United States is in fact already doing: training Iraqis, providing protection for the ongoing constitutional process, talking to regional neighbors, trying to get the Europeans involved in the Middle East, and hunting down terrorists on the Afghan borders.
My husband always blows up at the TV when some naysayer pundit says that what we really need to be doing in Iraq is training Iraqis to take over the job themselves so we can go home. My husband arrived in Iraq in March 2004, and this policy was already in effect. Iraqi solders went everywhere with American soldiers, and after the Transfer of Authority that summer, the official policy was to let Iraqi soldiers do as much of the work as possible. My husband says that American soldiers often grumbled that taking the Iraqis along was too much work, that it was easier for them to just go on a raid alone than to drag the Iraqis with and help them learn how to do it. But the constant refrain in my husband's battalion was "Unless you want to come back for OIF 10, you'd better teach these Iraqis how to do your job."
The policy since Day 1 was to train Iraqis to protect their own country. My husband was already doing it nearly two years ago; why do all these pundits think they're offering a solution the military has never thought of?
(Also read VDH's The Plague of Success: "It is chic now to deprecate the Iraqi security forces, but they are doing a lot more to kill jihadists than the French or Germans who often either wire terrorists money, sell them weapons, or let them go." Heh.)
Posted by: Sarah at
05:30 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 315 words, total size 2 kb.
1
"My husband always blows up at the TV when some naysayer pundit says that what we really need to be doing in Iraq is training Iraqis to take over the job themselves so we can go home. My husband arrived in Iraq in March 2004, and this policy was already in effect."
Do not expect human beings to keep silent simply because they have nothing of substance to say. When the subject is a celebrity, a media figure, or a politician, the likelihood that he'll say something,
anything, the moment the microphones come within range is as sure as the sun rising in the east.
Posted by: Francis W. Porretto at December 31, 2005 08:10 AM (PzL/5)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
December 02, 2005
TATTOOS
I've never been a tattoo person because I have a hard time imagining that I would want something on my body for forever. When my college friend interviewed the local tattoo parlor owner for a paper she wrote, the #1 tattoo for 1996 was the Tasmanian Devil. Do you know any grandpas who would want that on their biceps? I remember vividly the man who came to do maintenance on my grandma's apartment: he had a naked lady tattooed on his forearm. I'm sure that sounded like a great idea when he was 18, but not so much when he was 60.
Still, I gained a better appreciation of permanence after I read the book 7 Tattoos. And I did get tickled knowing that the Fellowship of the Ring all got the same elvish tattoo. I suppose if a tattoo means something or represents an event, it's better than the Tasmanian Devil. But I will say that the most touching tattoo story I've heard comes from Iraq.
Posted by: Sarah at
06:11 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 169 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Tattoos are popular for those wanting to memorialize those whom we never want to forget.
I know a soldier, where most of the unit got matching tattoos (second photo down):
http://www.ltkenballard.com/Tattoos.htm
Also the widow of one of the pilots from Big Windy 25 got this tattoo:
http://blog.siegnet.us/index.php/all/2005/11/25/happy_thanksgiving
And my friend who lost her husband in Iraq is going to get a Celtic Cross in memory of his Scottish roots.
Posted by: CaliValleyGirl at December 02, 2005 10:07 AM (6MF7N)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
November 30, 2005
DEBUNK
The other day I lost my temper with people who look down their noses at those in the military. Therefore, information on this study caught my attention on the news this morning.
Debunking the myth of the underprivileged soldier
...
According to a comprehensive study of all enlistees for the years 1998-99 and 2003 that The Heritage Foundation just released, the typical recruit in the all-volunteer force is wealthier, more educated and more rural than the average 18- to 24-year-old citizen is. Indeed, for every two recruits coming from the poorest neighborhoods, there are three recruits coming from the richest neighborhoods.
...
In fact, since the 9/11 attacks, more volunteers have emerged from the middle and upper classes and fewer from the lowest-income groups. In 1999, both the highest fifth of the nation in income and the lowest fifth were slightly underrepresented among military volunteers. Since 2001, enlistments have increased in the top two-fifths of income levels but have decreased among the lowest fifth.
Allegations that recruiters are disproportionately targeting blacks also don't hold water. First, whites make up 77.4% of the nation's population and 75.8% of its military volunteers, according to our analysis of Department of Defense data.
Second, we explored the 100 three-digit ZIP code areas with the highest concentration of blacks, which range from 24.1% black up to 68.6%. These areas, which account for 14.6% of the adult population, produced 16.6% of recruits in 1999 and only 14.1% in 2003.
The full reports can be read here:
Is Iraq a Poor Man's War?
Who Bears the Burden? Demographic Characteristics of U.S. Military Recruits Before and After 9/11
And for the guy who doesn't think anyone joins these days "for flag and country", what do you make of this?
After September 11, 2001, the educational quality of recruits rose slightly. Comparing 1999 enlisted recruits to 2003 recruits showed an increase in colÂÂlegiate experience. In 2003, a higher proportion of recruits had college experience and diplomas, and a lower percentage had only a high school diploma— a shift of about 3 percentage points.
That statistic would include close-to-my-heart recruit Tyler Prewitt, who left the baseball team at Phoenix College to enlist after September 11th and died in OIF II.
For flag and country.
Posted by: Sarah at
05:59 AM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
Post contains 376 words, total size 3 kb.
1
TP sounds like he was an exceptional young man. God Bless him and his family.
Posted by: Vonn at November 30, 2005 11:32 AM (dEgRi)
2
These statistics are all fine and dandy, but it just reveals just how much one can tweak the rhetoric by presenting other aspects of statistics. The USA Today article (don't have time to read Heritage foundation aticle at this point) went into great pains to pick out minutae from different sides of the same statistics.
I think what this reveals is not that the Heritage foundation got it all wrong--in fact, I think they got it all right. But, that everyone is skewing all of these things to fit a goal or another. Statistics never lie, because they don't tell us anything to begin with. Well...they do tell us some things, but they tell us things that are far, far less significant than we assume them to be.
(and that racial make-up is also deceptive. The biggest issue many people have when it comes to the racial make-up of the military is not that there are not enough white soldiers, but there are not enough black soldiers in the higher ranks. Now, I don't necessarily experience this first hand because my ROTC batallion has a lot of black and latino cadres. But I heard a statistic somewhere--please don't quote me on this--that the enlisted units are ~45% minority. The issue isn't how many people are in, but where those people are allocated, and why.)
Posted by: John at November 30, 2005 12:32 PM (enIP4)
3
Points taken. If you do have time, I would suggest reading at least the beginning of the "Is Iraq a Poor Man's War" article: that's where they address how other widely-published studies were flawed. Interesting stuff.
Posted by: Sarah at November 30, 2005 12:57 PM (zrXTX)
4
My 17 year old daughter has 4 friends 1 girl and 3 boys who all leave for boot camp right after Christmas. All are white, high school grads, 3 are middle class and 1 is upper middle class.
Posted by: Patti at November 30, 2005 03:40 PM (2hEo4)
5
So that no one interprets my anti-Bush stance as anti-military, let me make a point that I think is important and that people who complain about the disproportionate number of minority soldiers tend to miss. One reason that the military attracts a disproportionate number of minority soldiers is that it makes real efforts to treat them fairly. Their race is not an obstacle to their advancement the way it would often be in the private sector. Of course this hasn't always been true in the military, but it has made considerable strides in overcoming its racist legacy.
Posted by: Pericles at November 30, 2005 07:21 PM (eKf5G)
6
Military as racist is dumb, but I don't know about debunking the economic aspect. For the job seeker, the military is practically accessible in ways that other fields are not. For the less-credentialed, the military is a viable option where other options are out of reach. I view the accessibility of the military as a positive, not a negative. You still have to earn it, but opportunities for social advancement are real and honest in the military.
You touch on a theory I've held since 9/11 that the over-all number of recruits would drop (temporarily?) but the quality of recruits would rise. Before 9/11, the Army recruiting pitch was mainly about economic self-interest, which makes sense for a peace-time Army. Soldiering is more than a job, but many soldiers I knew in peace-time approached it as a job only. It was a lower standard that was acceptable because we were not at war. Calculations necessarily change in war-time. Based on the 'obsolete' peace-time economic-based recruiting pitch for a military now at war, it makes sense that the number of recruits would drop. At the same time, a higher ratio of those who join now are probably more inclined to be real 24/7 Soldiers and not minimum standard types. The quality should rise. I think that's a trade-off that in the long run, works better for the military: better soldiers, better leaders.
For my part, I ETSed before 9/11 to attend Columbia, and as proud as I was to be a soldier, I wouldn't have seriously considered returning. With the war changing and improving the quality of the military, though, I've been thinking seriously about going back in ... as a Columbia grad.
Posted by: Eric at November 30, 2005 09:08 PM (WgdtA)
7
A friend of mine used to have this to say about statistics......
"Figures don't lie ,but, liars figure."
Kinda changed my perspective on statistical analysis of anything.
Posted by: Pamela at December 01, 2005 10:52 AM (E/5rx)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
November 19, 2005
FED UP TOO
An excerpt from Cold Fury's
sweet rant on the disheartening damage President Clinton just did (a great post, by the way: read the whole thing):
The Marines and Army are involved in a couple slam bang fights as we speak, reducing a couple large pockets of Al Qaida fighters that have festered for a long time without intervention. Yet day after day, we hear nothing about where the fighting is going on, what’s really happening, who is being apprehended or killed, why the fight is in a particular place, what the strategic significance is, or how our young men and women are making us proud with their dedication to the mission and the country and their workaday, exceptional-is-the-new-ordinary heroism. Instead the only headline I ever see is “two Americans killed.” Or “five Americans killed.” Or “seven Americans injured in bombing.” Really? The only impression I get from the MSM is that the U.S. troops are basically lined up like metal ducks in a shooting gallery, being picked off one at a time without actually doing anything positive, not carrying out missions, whatever. I guess they are just wandering around in the ‘Raq, wearing do rags, listening to the Stones, smokin’ dope and waiting for their hitch to end.
It's such a Woman Thing to ask your husband "What are you thinking?" when he's quiet. (I know, I know, I've listened to Seinfeld, but it's hard not to ask.) More often than not these days, my husband's response is "Iraq". He's thinking about Iraq. Constantly. What he was doing this day last year, what he could've done better, how they could've f-ed up the bad guys a little more in this situation or that, and what he'll do differently the next time he goes. He thinks about it all the time -- about how he can be a more effective soldier, not how poor and miserable he was.
And at no point was he just walking around waiting to get killed or go home.
My husband takes his job seriously, and he took it extra-seriously while he was in Iraq. He put a couple of soldiers in jail for disobeying the rules, for pete's sake. He didn't sit around reading existentialist garbage and thinking about how, like, life has no meaning and war is not the answer. He's not a puppet, he's not a sitting duck, and he's not a mindless automaton under the control of the Bushitler Oil Junta. He's a man who helped the US Military take one more step towards winning the War on Terror.
So maybe, just once, he and the other brave men and women like him could get some good press for a change. Or some indication to the American public that they're winning this war. Is that too much to freaking ask?
Posted by: Sarah at
12:15 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 474 words, total size 3 kb.
1
You know, I think the headlines about the number of our soldiers killed reflect the fact that the American public has a great concern for them and values their lives. No one who reads past the headlines would get the impressions that our troops are just sitting around. There was a great deal of reporting, for example, about our increased activity near the Syrian border. And within the last week I saw a report on CNN--the epitome of the "liberal media"---that our offensive there was showing results.
So many of the complaints about the "MSM" involve exactly the same mistake that the MSM is supposed to be guilty of---selective reporting. Cherrypick stories and headlines, and of course you can make the reporting seem incredibly skewed.
Posted by: Pericles at November 20, 2005 09:59 AM (eKf5G)
2
Sarah,
Your husband is a Real Man who is just trying to be better than he was before. Real Americans know and expect this from him. The MSM are NOT Real Americans. And I'd venture to say, the foreign press wouldn't recognize Real Men even when they slapped them on the face.
Real Americans are proud of you, proud of your husband, intensely proud of Mrs. Sims and her husband's sacrifice, and just generally tickled pink with the way all of you have comported yourselves during this historic, but difficult time. Personally, I compare you all to the Rosie the Riveters, Private Ryan's of Normandy, and the heroes of WWII, male and female, who saved our country, and saved free civilization. You have all done so well when challenged and so bravely continued your duties when called.
While the press will never praise you, Real Americans know you. They love and admire you. Your blogging has significantly improved the number of folks who realize what a national treasure folks like you and your husband are.
It is never easy to live with Real Men. But then, you knew that already, didn't you? Now the rest of us know it too. And we've seen what Real Women are made of as well.
God Bless You all, dear. Don't get discouraged. We are behind you and we want to you be safe and successful. Press on.
Subsunk
Posted by: Subsunk at November 20, 2005 11:20 PM (SBriA)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
November 13, 2005
13 NOV 2004
The events that happened
one year ago today have changed my life. I know it sounds ridiculous and crass to say that, since it was my friend who lost her husband and not I, but I have never been the same. And though I didn't lose someone I love, I watched someone I love lose her husband, and I've watched her learning to live all over again for the past year.
I'm horrified that the reason we've become friends is because she lost her husband. I hate that this is so. I hate that I feel pressured to find more to talk about with her than just Fallujah and Cindy Sheehan. I hope we'll get there someday, because I've really grown to like her. I just hate the way we became friends.
Thursday night, Red6 came over for dinner. We had a little moment of silence remembering CSM Faulkenburg, which started a discussion of Fallujah. My husband was originally supposed to go instead of Red6. My husband had orders in hand for 24 hours, but then the Powers That Be decided two trips to Najaf was enough for one company, and they sent Red6 instead. If you've read Red6's blog, you know they made a good choice, and that's how my husband ended up on R&R instead of in Fallujah.
Our lives hang by a thread.
What my friendship with Heidi has taught me is to never take my husband for granted. We hug each other a little more often. We end our bickering a little more quickly. And we talk about death a lot more frequently. We've learned to dismiss any and all "hardships" that come our way, because it could always be a lot worse. I've learned to cherish life, more than I ever did before. I hate that it took a good man's death to teach me such a lesson, but I'm grateful for the lesson nonetheless.
I tell everyone over and over again how humbled I am to be Heidi's friend. She was the first person I thought of when I woke up today, and I can't even begin to tell her how sorry I am.
She has worried about how history will regard her husband's sacrifice: will it have been worth his life? I think history will show that her husband gave his life to preserve freedom and that it was indeed worth it. And I hope for the same future that Bill Whittle does:
Despite all the switches in the rail yard, there is a flow and a direction to history that cannot and will not be denied.
It is the slow, uneven, grasping climb toward freedom. There are markers on Little Round Top, on the beaches at Normandy, and in the sands of Nasiriyah that show us where men have fought and laid down their lives, and willingly left their wives without husbands and their children without fathers, all for this idea. It is an idea bigger than they are, bigger than self-centered movie stars, bigger than cynical and bitter journalists, bigger than Presidents and Dictators, bigger, in fact, than all human failure and miscalculation.
It is the idea that people – all people – deserve to live their lives in freedom. Free from fear. Free from want. Free from despair and hatred.
My country has, again, taken up that banner, and the behavior of our young men and women under unimaginable stress and provocation has filled me with fierce and unremitting pride. We fight, nearly alone, alongside old and true friends, British and Australian, themselves decent and honorable people, long champions of freedom who have their own Waterloos and Gallipolis and cemeteries marked with fields of red poppies, rolls of sacrifice and honor that should fill all American hearts with pride. For friends like this are worth having, and I will always prefer the company of one or two solid, dependable friends over legions of fashionable and trendy and unreliable ones.
And someday, centuries from now, in the world we all hope for but which only a few will fight for, all of this death and destruction will be gone. All that will be left will be small markers in green fields that were once deserts, places where Iraqi families may walk someday with the same taken-for-granted sense of happiness and security I had in Pennsylvania and Virginia.
And perhaps they will read the strange-sounding names, and try to imagine a time when it was all in doubt.
Heidi can hold her head high, knowing that someday Iraqi children will read this name and be grateful. I am grateful already.

Posted by: Sarah at
06:09 AM
| Comments (10)
| Add Comment
Post contains 774 words, total size 5 kb.
1
Don't forget to add Bunker Hill to that list of signature battle-sites. Our military is older than the nation it serves because it was our military that fought, bled and died to make America a free nation.
Posted by: Eric at November 13, 2005 10:50 AM (dkUKh)
2
Sarah,
Thank you for such an eloquent post. It made me shed some tears for Heidi and all those who have lost their husbands and fathers. We do take life for granted so much of the time, but as one grows older and experiences more, one begins to realize the real priorities and sacrifices in life. With your blog, Sarah, if you can make a difference in even one person's life, you have succeeded. I hope you continue to blog for a very long time. I love you so much and am thankful God has blessed me with such a wonderful daughter. I thought of Heidi yesterday, and my prayers are with her and Colin at this time. God bless all of those who have paid the price for our freedom.
Love, Mama
Posted by: Nancy at November 13, 2005 11:14 AM (Z+RCN)
3
Sarah,
That is so well said. It made me angry in the Vietnam era when the troops were treated so badly and they fought and died for the same freedoms. Million died because we pulled out then and the troops were not welcomed when they came home, that is the stain on our history, not the war, but how ugly the troops were treated. God bless them all.
Ruth
Posted by: Ruth H at November 13, 2005 12:33 PM (9IP1F)
4
Okay, so I have started reading this but I am crying too much to finish . . . will have to give me a day or two to read the entire post . . .
Posted by: Heidi at November 13, 2005 10:59 PM (gMjwx)
5
Growth, maturity, wisdom....all come at a cost. Sometimes the cost is high. God bless.
Posted by: Pamela at November 14, 2005 01:43 PM (JZD9n)
6
Sarah,
Great posting, as usual. But one thing to note, however, is that the majority of this country is not committed to sacrificing their sons and daughters to free people in distant lands. Haven't been for the past 30 years or so.
In theory, most would say yes, but when push comes to shove, we're not.
We have elections every two years, electing a new executive every four. Our policy in Iraq in February of 2007 could be "cut and run", if trends continue. The president may want to keep people there, but like in Vietnam, Congress needs only to cut off the money and today's defeated enemy can become tomorrows victor.
This nation is committed to our own freedom, I'm quite sure. But we are NOT committed to anyone else's. We probably should be, but barring a massive cultural revolution, we're not.
Posted by: Sean at November 14, 2005 07:26 PM (FRjNx)
7
Heidi,
I have no words that are able to express what I feel in my heart so I'll just say Thank You and hope you know what it is I'm trying to convey.
Sarah,
thank you for an excellent post.
Posted by: Tink at November 15, 2005 04:59 PM (S6VXg)
8
Thank you, Sarah. You could not have said it more perfectly.
It was hard to know what to say to someone you only in passing and a few Friday night dinners. My thoughts are with Heidi and Colin all the time. I am sending her this note through your post. I hope she reads it.
Posted by: Jennifer at November 16, 2005 01:14 PM (KyhUS)
9
Ladies,
I thank you for loving the military men in your lives. I thank you for shouldering the burdens of a life so difficult in nature, so lonely in its lingering moments, so unappreciated by so many, yet so wonderful and delightful at its best. You deserve so much more than our country will ever give you. Your husbands must recognize how much you did for them and your families and how much they needed your support.
And for Mrs. Sims, you must recognize that what you have lost can never be replaced by your country, but in its place, please accept our undying affection and love for you and his children, as befits a brave man who served his country and was lost to her and to you.
We will never be able to adequately explain how much we needed your husband. In fact we needed him so much, that we had to take him from you, not on our design, but because of his choice to offer himself to us. I pray the Lord will ease your grief in time, and bring you happiness and solace once again, as soon as you can bear it. America is grateful, even when you don't hear it from the public voices of the press.
God bless you both, ladies, and all the ladies who choose to marry a warrior, for better or worse. For surely, there is no one who deserves the Love and Honors of America than one who has given her best Love to her country's service and survival. Thank you, both.
We shall honor them all. Press on to Victory.
Subsunk
Posted by: Subsunk at November 18, 2005 01:36 AM (SBriA)
10
Wow.. I was just about to delete your blog from my links as I have no idea what it's doing there.. but I happened to see this picture.
Patrick went to my high school.. and my roommate as well as a great deal of my friends and teachers attended his funeral.
I am very sorry for Heidi's loss. I know that there are a great deal of people who miss him. I have heard nothing but amazing things about him.. and how it never should have been him. He was too good of a guy to go and we needed him here desperately.
It's a small world in the military. You never know who you'll come across or meet. I didn't know Sean, but I know that SAHSians everywhere were notified of his death and that there was an outpouring of sympathy, sadness, and condolences. I couldn't attend as I had my own training, but I did take an hour to honor him on the day of his funeral.
We never take it likely when a miltary dependant school kid makes the ultimate sacrifice for their country. There aren't words enough... Just know that there were thousands of Sahsians praying for you and your family Heidi... and he is still thought of today.. by those who adored him.
Sincerely,
Phoenix
Posted by: Army Girl at November 19, 2005 05:16 PM (0AzKD)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
November 11, 2005
THE VETERANS IN MY FAMILY
This post is a tribute to the veterans in my family. I'm proud that I've got four generations of heroes here.

my great-great uncle on my paternal grandfather's side, in the Army in WWI

my great-great uncle on my paternal grandmother's side, in the Army in WWI

my paternal grandfather, in the Army Air Corps in WWII

my great uncle, my grandfather's brother, also in the Army Air Corps in WWII

my father's brother, in the Air Force

another of my father's brothers, in the Army

my father-in-law, in the Army

my husband's brother, in 1ID during OIF II

and the husband, in 1ID during OIF II
Posted by: Sarah at
06:15 AM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 117 words, total size 2 kb.
1
A handsome group of men Sarah. Thank You to them and to all who served/serve our country.
Posted by: Mary Ann at November 11, 2005 09:10 AM (ssGwL)
2
Sarah,
That was a really nice post. You've got a great-great uncle, Max Addington, who served in the army in WWI. I have letters that he wrote to my dad, your grandfather and a little boy at the time, from the battlefield in Germany. Your grandfather, Carl Addington, was not able to serve because he had a bad heart from rheumatic fever (no antibiotics at the time). He was very active on the homefront raising war bonds. I have a scrapbook with all the newspaper articles about his war efforts. Thanks for doing this on Veteran's Day.
Love, Mama
Posted by: Nancy at November 12, 2005 03:05 AM (Z+RCN)
3
Yeah, all the photos I have are from Dad's side of the family...
Posted by: Sarah at November 12, 2005 03:11 PM (SuC0Z)
4
Warrior Caste, and some really nice smiles.
Kalroy
Posted by: Kalroy at November 15, 2005 12:18 PM (9RG5y)
5
Wow, that's quite a line of heretige you have there. You dad, grandfather sure do look a lot alike. I bet you are really proud of them. I'm glad they served.
Posted by: Lucy Stern at November 15, 2005 07:13 PM (dz3wA)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
THANK YOU
Two years ago, I thanked veterans I did not know.
Last year everyone I knew became a veteran. This year it just seems a little hollow for me to keep repeating how proud I am of all of the brave men and women who do the fighting for me.
So this year I'll let the Kurds thank you for me. Their words carry much more weight than mine do.
(Thanks for the video link go to Tim, one half of a pair of great veterans.)
Posted by: Sarah at
05:25 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 89 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Way to go!!! Thanks for keeping things like this going. It's so easy to just forget about it (I know I do) I'm glad (and Proud)you're around remembering for us all.
Thanks again - Boy did I really look that young once!
Posted by: Uncle Chuck at November 13, 2005 10:29 AM (sWtas)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
November 10, 2005
OOPS
The worst part about a promotion is forgetting the little things. This morning my husband woke me up at 0530: "Can you please sew rank on my kevlar cover?"
Posted by: Sarah at
03:08 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 31 words, total size 1 kb.
1
What the hell does Russ need his Kevlar for? I thought that was the whole point of finance?
Posted by: JSC at November 11, 2005 09:53 PM (S4PKr)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
November 03, 2005
CALLING ALL MOMS
Well, I wrote a letter to
SGT Eddie Ryan. But I'm the only person I know who doesn't have any kids who can draw a picture for him. Maybe your kids wouldn't mind putting something in the mail for this brave marine? (Or maybe Angie could get Fred to do one of his famous
fridge drawings...heh.)
Posted by: Sarah at
05:34 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 62 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Hey Sarah--
I'm having my students write to him. What a hero!
Posted by: Lara at November 03, 2005 07:06 PM (qNwer)
2
Don't worry...Adam is on his 3rd picture - they all look the same to me - a huge dino with a head in the clouds - he insists they are different. I'll have to stop him soon...
Posted by: Agnieszka O. in CO at November 03, 2005 07:29 PM (uFJJO)
3
Sarah - Eddie grew up about an hour and a half away from here in a place I visit often. My son's 5th grade class is making him cards, as well as a friend's 3rd grade class. Thanks for the info. We'll do our best to keep him busy.
Posted by: Kathleen A at November 03, 2005 09:43 PM (7qm8p)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
November 01, 2005
CONGRATS, HUSBAND

Posted by: Sarah at
05:31 AM
| Comments (17)
| Add Comment
Post contains 4 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Wow. Congratulations, Captain.
Posted by: Bob at November 01, 2005 10:00 AM (WMa4u)
2
"Captain"--has a nice sound to it, huh? I remember when I got my PO1 crow (long ago in a galaxy far away), and the sense of accomplishment I felt (kinda wish I had stayed in and gone for chief, but...). Enjoy that feeling. And, Sarah--be proud. Be very proud! (I know you are.)
Congratulations, Captain!
Jim
Posted by: Jim Shawley at November 01, 2005 10:51 AM (CnYsu)
3
Woohoo! Silver railroad tracks!
Posted by: Jason at November 01, 2005 11:23 AM (565iX)
Posted by: Ted at November 01, 2005 12:17 PM (blNMI)
Posted by: Erin at November 01, 2005 05:08 PM (yx7c4)
Posted by: Pixy Misa at November 01, 2005 11:45 PM (RbYVY)
7
[executing a proper salute] Congratulations, sir.
Posted by: Jim - PRS at November 02, 2005 12:30 AM (oowdc)
8
Congratulations to the best son-in-law anyone could ask for. We're proud of you.
Your In-Laws
Posted by: Nancy at November 02, 2005 03:44 AM (Z+RCN)
9
Congrats! Promotions all around - my hubby just pinned his new rank as well. Cheers, to him and to you!
HH6
Posted by: Household6 at November 02, 2005 04:33 AM (T+Tkq)
10
Congratulations!!! When's the party?
Remember, it can't be a good one unless the cops come at least once and there aren't a couple of kegs floating within a couple of hours.
MajorDad1984
Posted by: MajorDad1984 at November 02, 2005 09:07 AM (tdEnf)
11
OOOHHH!!!! Promotion! Congratulations!
Posted by: Teresa at November 02, 2005 02:31 PM (FZwDL)
12
grats on the train tracks

Hope you get your leaf right quick.
Posted by: Dagamore at November 03, 2005 03:27 AM (7IZfE)
13
Congratulations to you both! I can't think of a more deserving officer and team.
Posted by: The Meanest Captain You Know at November 04, 2005 12:52 AM (1R9Tw)
14
Outstanding. Congratulations!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Kalroy
PS
HUZZAH!!!
Posted by: Kalroy at November 04, 2005 12:48 PM (9RG5y)
15
Congratulations to you and your Captain. This is an exciting time in an officer's career.
Posted by: Sgt Hook at November 04, 2005 10:36 PM (jlMVG)
16
Hope I'm not to late to add my congratulations!
Remember Sarah,you get at least half the credit.
Posted by: Mary at November 08, 2005 07:07 AM (YwdKL)
17
Program on the emergence of civilization.
"14 species of large animals capable of domesitcation in the history of mankind.
13 from Europe, Asia and northern Africa.
None from the sub-Saharan African continent. "
Favor.
And disfavor.
They point out AfricansÂ’ failed attempts to domesticate the elephant and zebra, the latter being an animal they illustrate that had utmost importance for it's applicability in transformation from a hunting/gathering to agrarian-based civilization.
The roots of racism are not of this earth.
Austrailia, aboriginals:::No domesticable animals.
The North American continent had none. Now 99% of that population is gone.
AIDS in Africa.
Organizational Heirarchy
Heirarchical order, from top to bottom:
1. MUCK - perhaps have experienced multiple universal contractions (have seen multiple big bangs), creator of the artificial intelligence humans ignorantly refer to as "god"
2. Perhaps some mid-level alien management
3. Evil/disfavored aliens - runs day-to-day operations here and perhaps elsewhere
Terrestrial management:
4. Chinese/egyptians - this may be separated into the eastern and western worlds
5. Romans - they answer to the egyptians
6. Mafia - the real-world interface that constantly turns over generationally so as to reinforce the widely-held notion of mortality
7. Jews, corporation, women, politician - Evidence exisits to suggest mafia management over all these groups.
Movies foreshadowing catastrophy
1985 James Bond View to a Kill 1989 San Francisco Loma Prieta earthquake.
Many Muslims are being used like the Germans and Japanese of WWII::being used to hurt others and envoke condemnation upon their people.
They can affect the weather and Hurricane Katrina was accomplished for many reasons and involves many interests, as anything this historical is::
1. Take heat off Sheenhan/Iraq, protecting profitable war machine/private war contracts
2. Gentrification. New Orleans median home price of $84k is among the lowest in major American cities, certainly among desirable cities.
Our society gives clues to the system in place. We all have heard the saying "He has more money than god." There is also an episode of the Simpsons where god meets Homer and says "I'm too old and rich for this."
This is the system on earth because this is the system everywhere.
god is evil because of money.
I don't want to suggest the upper eschelons are evil and good is the fringe.
But they have made it abundantly clear that doing business with evil (disfavored) won't help people. They say only good would have the ear, since evil is struggling for survival, and therefore only the favored could help me.
The clues are there which companies are favored and which are disfavored, market domination being one clue, but they conceal it very hard because it is so crucial.
I offer an example of historical proportions:::
People point to Walmart and cry "anti-union".
Unions enable disfavored people to live satisfactorly without addressing their disfavor. This way their family's problems are never resolved. Without the union they would have to accept the heirarchy, their own inferiority.
Unions serve to empower.
Walmart is anti-union because they are good. They try to help people address and resolve their problems by creating an enviornment where there are fewer hurdles.
Media ridicule and lawsuits are creations to reinforce people's belief that Walmart is evil.
Low-cost disfavored Chinese labor is utilized by corporate america to maximize margins. They all do it. Only WalMart gets fingered because they are the ones who help, and those who seek to create confusion in the marketplace want to eliminate the vast middle class who have a real chance and instead stick with a lower classes who may not work otherwise. So they dirty him up while allowing the others to appear clean.
The middle class is being deceived. They are being misled into the unfavored, and subsequently will have no assistance from their purchases with corporate america.
I believe the coining of the term "Uncle Sam" was a clue alluding to just this::Sam Walton and WalMart is one of few saviors of the peasant class.
Amercia is a country of castoffs, rejects. Italy sent its criminals. Malcontents.
Between the thrones, the klans and kindred, they "decided" who they didn't want and acted, creating discontent and/or starvation.
The u.s. is full of disfavored rejects. It is the reason for the myriad of problems not found in European countries. As far as the Rockafellers and other industrialists of the 19th century go, I suspect these aren't their real names. I suspect they were chosen to go and head this new empire.
Royalty is the right way to organize a society. Dictatorships and monarchies are a reflection of the antient's hierarchical organization.
Positions go to those who have favor with the rulers, as opposed to being elected.
Elections bring a false sense of how the world is. Democracy misleads people.
Which is why the disfavored rejects were sent to the shores of America::To keep them on the wrong path.
Jesus Christ is a religious figure of evil. These seperatist churches formed so they could still capture the rest of the white people, keeping them worshipping the wrong god.
And now they do it to people of color, Latinos and Asians, after centuries of preying upon them.
Since Buddism doesn't recongnize a god, the calls are never heard, and Chinese representation is instead selected by the thrones.
It was set up this way. Perhaps dyanstic thrones had a say, but maybe not.
Budda was the Asian's Jesus Christ::: bad for the people. "They came up at the same time for a reason."
Simpson's foreshadowing::Helloween IV special, Flanders is Satan. "Last one you ever suspect."
"You'll see lots of nuns where you're going:::hell!!!" St. Wigham, Helloween VI, missionary work, destroying cultures.
Over and over, the Simpsons was a source of education and enlightenment, a target of ridicule by the system which wishes to conceal its secrets.
Jews maim the body formed in the image of "god", and inflicted circumsision upon all other white people, as well as the evil that is Jesus Christ.
I think about how Jews (were used to) created homosexuality among Slavics, retribution for the Holocaust.
Then I think of the Catholic Church and its troubles.
What connection is here between Jews and the Catholic church???
And if it is their sinister motives thatÂ’s behind the evil that is Jesus Christ are they being used at all?
Perhaps it is them who are pulling strings.
I believe Islam is the one true religion, and those misled christians who attack "god's" most favored people will pay for it dearly one day.
Posted by: grandpa stole bets at November 12, 2005 03:24 PM (tyyhe)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
October 22, 2005
EXCUSES
I made the mistake of reading
this CaliValleyGirl post right before bed. I can't get it out of my mind, and the more I think about it, the angrier I get.
I'm not 100% sure what I think about the "don't ask, don't tell" policy. I don't think gay soldiers are any less worthy than straight ones, but I do know there are a significant number of anti-gay soldiers (if my experiences teaching college classes here on post are any indication), and "don't ask, don't tell" is a way of protecting gay Americans who'd like to serve their country. It's perhaps not a perfect policy, but it's the best we've got right now.
What I know for a fact though is that "don't ask, don't tell" certainly isn't an alternative to conscientious objector status. That's what happened in the case of the gay Marine highlighted in CVG's articles. This man is not a champion for gay rights, though the glowing tones of the articles would like you to believe he is. He wasn't caught sleeping with a man and forced to leave the service. His commander and unit seemed to like him. Leaving the Marines was his choice and his alone.
This Marine wrote a 7-page letter to his commander stating that he won't be used as a tool of the Bushitler Oil Junta and kill kids for Halliburton in an Illegal War for Missing WMDs, oh and by the way, P.S. I'm gay. He used his victim status to get out of responsibility. He didn't want to go back to Iraq because he hates the president (enough to imply that he'd rather kill the Bush administration than terrorists), so he came up with the perfect way to get out of his enlistment: The Gay Excuse. Thus, they reluctantly kicked him out for being gay -- because he told without being asked -- and now he travels with Cindy Sheehan and is hyped in gay publications for being a pioneer for gay rights in the military.
Excuse me?
I'm sure there are plenty of gay soldiers who are serving honorably. I'm also sure there are plenty of straight soldiers who'd love to have the easy-out of The Gay Excuse. But getting yourself intentionally kicked out of the Marines for being gay doesn't make you a hero. Using your victimhood to shirk the oath you took doesn't make you a champion of the gay community. You found the easy way out and took it, friend, so don't blame your plight on the Marines or George Bush or anyone but yourself.
If you truly believed that "banning gays in the military is archaic and stupid," as you said, then you wouldn't use that ban as an excuse; you wouldn't cheapen your integrity just to get what you want. Don't act like you Spoke Truth To Power, when all you really did is get out of the military on a technicality. That's despicable.
But at least you got to make out with some Iraqi boys, right?
Posted by: Sarah at
04:44 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 505 words, total size 3 kb.
October 12, 2005
DEJA VU
Lately the husband and I have been discussing the possibility of another deployment. I keep assuring him that it really wasn't that bad for me and that I could easily handle another. But today when we woke up at 0415 and I drove him to his unit for a three-day field exercise, I got a little misty-eyed as I drove away. All of a sudden I got that Deployment Feeling again, and I remembered that although I
could do another deployment, I really would prefer to have him around.
I was looking forward to today because Charlie is at the vet getting neutered. I thought that with him out of the house for the first time since we got him, I might be able to get some work done without his little golden paws all over everything. Just a few moments ago, I realized how much I love that silly little dog. I miss him already, and I just realized I'd rather have him around too, even if he would be barking at the vacuum cleaner and trying to drink the mop water.
Posted by: Sarah at
02:53 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 187 words, total size 1 kb.
1
...but it's a good thing he's being neutered because otherwise he'd be humping the vacuum cleaner.
Posted by: Curtis at October 12, 2005 12:05 PM (5QCjc)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
October 08, 2005
STORIES
Raven1 got some great advice from his chaplain before returning from Iraq. One paragraph won't do it justice; you have to
read the whole thing.
When my husband was home on R&R, he had a bit much to drink and accidentally told me a story he hadn't intended to repeat. He was genuinely surprised that the story didn't freak me out, and it opened the door to telling me a bit more. When he got home at the end of the year, he told me some of the worst things that happened in his time in Iraq. I'm glad that he thinks I'm strong enough to hear them.
I think stories after the fact aren't nearly as frightening as what we wives imagined on our own while they were gone. His reality was no match for my creativity! We who stand and wait read blog posts and news reports about everyone's most exciting days in Iraq, so it's easy to forget that not every day is a battle.
My husband is quiet with his stories though. He and Red6 have talked, but for the most part, his year is his own. He doesn't want to try to explain his experience to anyone, for the only ones who can truly understand it are his platoon sergeant and the other three men in his tank. Sometimes I feel sad that he doesn't get to see any of those guys anymore; it would be nice for him to spend time with people who didn't need to hear the stories because they were there with him.
Posted by: Sarah at
05:57 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 264 words, total size 1 kb.
1
My boyfriend is in Iraq now, and I hope he feels like he can tell me what he needs to get off his chest when he gets back.
Posted by: Julie at October 08, 2005 10:37 AM (ztpAP)
2
My son-in-law had some very gruesome experiences in Vietnam and is finally getting help for PTSS. He had never really talked about it until about ten years ago when he found the letters he wrote his mother and told her only what he wanted to eat when he got home and how unharmed he was. They were all not true, he went over them with one of my sons and they wrote a book, never published of his letters home and what was actually going on at the time. This seemed to help him a lot.
But then Sept 11th happened and the Iraq war and he became increasingly more depressed. In Feb at the advice of some long time friends who were there with him he started getting help. He is better but... I think the fact that they live in Louisiana, right between both storms, and he was very actively involved with helping survivors, sent him into another tailspin. He is very fragile and I wish I could help him more. His therapy partly consists of sessions with his two friends who were there with him. They all understand. I wish he had gotten help when he first came home. Encourage those you know to talk with each other and get help if they need it. Nip any really bad depression in the bud.
I know a lot of people never get into this bad a condition, but I grieve for those who do.
Posted by: Ruth H at October 09, 2005 11:59 AM (iKlAZ)
3
Sarah - Thanks for the link to Raven1, it's always good to find another blogger from WA.
It's a testament to your marriage that you and your husband have been able to talk through some of his experiences -- I am sure that there are times when the men in our lives protect us from what they fear will cause us harm. Which, of course, is just part of feeling safe and secure.
I know what you mean about your creativity! Imagination is a cruel thing sometimes!!!
Posted by: Barb at October 10, 2005 12:57 PM (u8Zgq)
4
My spouse has told me stories before and more of them come out while he tells a friend over a beer. I used to be hurt that he was reserved but then I realized he was trying to keep me sane.
This deployment he asked me if I wanted to know right away (OPSEC maintained of course) or to not know until later when he's home. I opted to hear right away with the right to change my mind. So far this works and works well for us. He sometimes needs a vent to someone outside of the whole picture and I provide that for him. It doesn't mean that it doesn't scare the crap out of me but I listen when he needs it.
HH6
Posted by: Household6 at October 11, 2005 06:37 AM (T+Tkq)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
October 06, 2005
EXPO
I didn't get to attend the Land Combat Expo here in Germany, but a part of me was apparently there...

I still can't believe that they chose to showcase my blog along with more notable milblogs. What an honor.
Posted by: Sarah at
03:07 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 41 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Pretty nice honor! Well deserved, I think.
Do you have a large enough image to see who each of the other milblogs are as well? The one in the lower left looks like Heartless Libertarian, perhaps.
Posted by: Barb at October 06, 2005 02:44 PM (u8Zgq)
2
Nope, 'fraid to say that lower left one (the black and red-- old design) is me. One of the others is The Hooker and His Girl, and I think another is Armor-gedden. Not sure who the others are.
Posted by: LorelieLong at October 17, 2005 07:16 AM (ZQJGc)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
September 29, 2005
COLA
They're going to start
normalizing COLA, giving everyone in Germany the same amount. This means that some folks are getting huge cuts in their paychecks, while we in our community will get more. Because we have always had the lowest COLA in Europe. So we're supposed to feel sorry for families in these other areas who are going to get less money and "end up on food stamps or something"? Families in our area make do.
I never understood how they calculated COLA anyway. My brother-in-law lives 20 minutes from Wurzburg. If he lived in Wurzburg, he'd get double the COLA, regardless of the fact that he already does all of his shopping in Wurzburg. I don't understand how that has anything to do with purchasing power. If we had to buy groceries and clothes on the economy, then I might understand, but we have a PX and commissary for that reason. If you choose to buy that 900 Euro DVD player off post, that's your problem; the government shouldn't have to subsidize it for you. Especially since the PX sells them for $39.
Remember that old article about COLA? "Every time the euro rises one euro cent in value against the dollar, the dollar increase in salary and benefits for local-national employees at the Navy Exchanges is $187,000 adjusted annually." COLA is just one of the ways the US government throws money down a hole in Europe. Send us home, where there is no COLA.
MORE TO GROK:
Oh look, more boo-hooing. American military families all over Germany have to pay childcare and phone bills, and people in our community manage just fine with half the COLA you've been getting all along.
Posted by: Sarah at
03:53 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 285 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Republicans who call for the troops to be brought home before the mission is complete are obviously just not well versed enough in the Administration's reasons for having trooops in Germany.

Just funning ya.
Posted by: Pericles at September 29, 2005 07:05 AM (EpPuP)
2
it's the same old story sarah.what i don't think you understand fully is as everything goes up like gas,food,etc you just suddenly get a paycut because of some bureaucrat?there is no way to damage morale quicker than that.it almost like being asked to do more for less coming home from a war zone.or worse getting a paycut BEFORE you get shipped out to the sand.i make over $70,000 a year as a civilian with a union job and good health benefits.the most i made in the military was &13,500.GO NAVY.HAHAHAHAHA.and i just have a high school diploma.it is a shame that this country is fighting a war and only a small percentage of people are being asked to sacrifice.it is time for you to start looking at who is responsible for this fact sarah.you're a smart lady figure it out.also sorry about the brats in the schools over there.
Posted by: tommy at September 29, 2005 09:03 AM (NMK3S)
3
I'm glad there are people that don't mind serving as civilians overseas...because I sure don't want to go. Every couple of years I'm offered a 3 year tour in Heidelburg to do Operations Research stuff, but I've never felt as home as I do in America. I suppose that if the world were about to end and they needed my big brain over there (just kidding folks...I'm pretty bright, but not Einstein) I'd go. We'd have to have a clause in my deployment agreement about Hefeweizen though! (Love that stuff!)
As far as COLAs and grade creep that occurs in some areas...even here in the states the playing field isn't level. In my command, if you work in DC...do the same job I do here in the middle of bumpkinville Texas (according the the DC boys) I'm graded as a GS-12. Were I to take a job in the same command doing about the same job...poof! I'd be a 13 with 14 right around the corner.
While I'm exceedingly frustrated with the leadership/management skills (remember, those can be both good or bad) here...I'm still living like a king in a low cost of living area.
Best of luck fighting the Euro, the PX/Commissary system, etc.
The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.
MajorDad1984
Posted by: MajorDad1984 at October 01, 2005 09:41 AM (tdEnf)
4
we left ramstein about a year and a half ago after 4 1/2yrs of living in germany. the first year there was terrifying 'cause we didn't know what our pay was going to be from month to month, were living on the economy where we had to save some each month to pay for our oil tank, convert dollars to deutshe marks for rent, and figure out the whole bill paying system. we started seeing that we were coming out far better than we ever did in the state-side bases. my husband was an e6, then e7. we have 3 kids and i am a stay at home mom. we did a lot of shopping while in germany...things we'd never have been able to afford had we stayed in the states! you want to know what was shocking? losing that cola when we returned to the states. we moved to eglin, housing here is extremely tight, as it is around a lot of bases based on info i've had from friends who've also moved back. it took a full year to live again on the lower income and it's still a challenge to make ends meet. while i don't have daycare, my kids are now more involved in extracurricular activities...band being the biggest. i know it's difficult making ends meet...we've been doing it his whole career, but it's a dreamworld, and reality comes crashing back when you get back to the states.
Posted by: me at October 02, 2005 08:44 AM (0N9tr)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
September 12, 2005
GI BILL
I guess it will help retention, and the article doesn't spell out which MOSs will be affected, but as a rule I do not support the idea of
extending the GI Bill to spouses. I personally think that this is a benefit that the soldier receives in order to better
himself, not his spouse. Spouses already are eligible for no-questions-asked military scholarships that cut their tuition in half, which I think is a very valuable benefit. Thus, I personally think the GI Bill belongs to the GI.
Posted by: Sarah at
11:28 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 91 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Since most degrees enhance earning ability, I believe they should be paid for by an income tax surcharge, with discounts for certain public services like military.
Of course, when I wanted to use my GI bill to get a commercial pilot's license "they" decided you needed a confirmed job offer before you could get aid. Lots of flying schools closed shortly after. I never thought to ask why you could train to be a poet without a job offer.
Posted by: Walter E. Wallis at September 12, 2005 03:04 PM (wDJE+)
2
I agree with you...GI Bill's there to provide a benefit to the servicemember, not the spouse.
There are plenty of opportunities within "the system" (such as the civil service one I still work in) for spouses to get hiring preferences over damned near everyone else. Makes sense as we ask spouse's to follow soldiers, sailors, airmen and marines all over...often moving every 3-4 years. While things might be changing in regard to the frequency of moves, I think that's quite a handy bennie to have available.
We really need to start thinking about the money "we" the government spend like it was our own. Throwing money at perceived problems doesn't necessarily solve anything. Far too many times I think it's done out of compassion...or guilt.
See you on the high ground.
MajorDad1984
Posted by: MajorDad1984 at September 13, 2005 06:57 PM (5kkjP)
3
I see where you are all coming from, but disagree. Indeed, MajorDad, the degree could be a benefit to the spouse... but perhaps the spouse has in mind that it is a benefit to the military member and the military member's children/family, etc. This money is already allocated for the service member, so if it benefits him/her in the long run, because the spouse is able to pull in higher income, I believe this should be made available.
Posted by: Corina at September 30, 2005 05:49 PM (6krEN)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
August 28, 2005
94th
The 94th Engineer Combat Battalion from our post is battling their
second summer in Iraq. They were the first unit to stay a
full 365 days for OIF I, and now they're back again for OIF III. I am friends with a few of 94th's wives, and I have been so impressed with their fortitude and optimism. They say that the second year is easier than the first...
Posted by: Sarah at
10:07 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 70 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I don't dare ever have a pity party around the wives in my bf's unit. They were in Iraq (Kuwait at first) from Feb. 2003 until Feb. 2004, and this is at least the second deployment for most. Once one of the newbie wives made some kind of complaint about missing an anniversary together, because of this deployment...and another wife said, well, yeah...this is our fifth deployment! Her hubs had been deployed to Bosnia, South America and I don't know where else, but she was an old hand at this...and oh, my goodness, only 2 years older than I am. It definitely is a comfort to hear that it gets easier, I truly believe it does. Because mid-deployment is A LOT easier than the beginning. And oh my goodness...I am like counting single digits now until I see my man...sooo exciting!
Posted by: CaliValleyGirl at August 28, 2005 06:23 PM (ZAHji)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
August 27, 2005
SUSPENSE
Michael Yon's account of Mosul kept me on the edge of my seat. Mama, you gotta read this one.
Posted by: Sarah at
10:21 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 21 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Oh this mama read it... wow
Just hope his luck holds out.
Can't help of thinking about Steven Vincent :^(
Posted by: Pebble at August 27, 2005 07:42 PM (6mUkl)
2
That was amazing. Thank heaven for people like Michael Yon who know firsthand what our boys experience in Iraq and will write about it. We need to hear these stories on a constant basis to make us realize the sacrifices our young men make for us. The part about the letter from the Lamas gave me chills, and LTC Kurilla is a firstclass human being and someone I would be proud to know. Thanks for sharing.
Love, Mama
Posted by: nancy at August 29, 2005 02:16 AM (+pnEF)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
August 26, 2005
GOALS
We hear a lot about the Army not meeting its recruiting goals this year, but
here's something I hadn't heard yet anywhere:
The active Army’s fiscal 2005 recruiting goal is 80,000, but Schoomaker said he and his generals are predicting that the service will be “a couple of thousand short” when the fiscal year ends Sept. 30.
That shortfall can be absorbed without affecting the ArmyÂ’s operations, Schoomaker said, because it only takes 72,000 new recruits to sustain the force.
“What this really means is that we’re not building the 30,000 [increase] as fast as I’d like, Schoomaker said, referring to the Army’s ongoing effort to boost its end-strength from 480,000 to 510,000 by 2007.
So the goal is set higher than what they need. It's not good to be short, but it's not the end of the world, as some would like us to believe. Schoomaker continues:
But when it comes to judging the Army’s health, it is the Army’s continuing success at keeping soldiers, not bringing in new ones, that is the service’s true “report card,” Schoomaker said.
All 10 of the active ArmyÂ’s divisions have met 100 percent or more of their retention goals, Schoomaker said, with the highest re-enlistments posted by units either in combat or freshly home from Iraq or Afghanistan.
Outstanding news.
Posted by: Sarah at
11:14 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 219 words, total size 1 kb.
131kb generated in CPU 0.0343, elapsed 0.1651 seconds.
64 queries taking 0.1412 seconds, 269 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.