August 28, 2007
KLEENEX ALERT
This article needs no introduction. Just go read it.
My Cousin Frankie
Posted by: Sarah at
12:09 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 16 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Thanks for noting, and the kleenex alert. No words seem adequate. Frankie and his fellow Marines will not be forgotten.
Posted by: jck at August 29, 2007 11:30 AM (xtjKZ)
2
Thanks for the heads up; It is not often that people get to hear about contractors that are in Iraq/Afghanistan that are there for more then just the money. Sometimes itÂ’s to pay off a debt to a family member that can never be repaid. I hope Mr De Locia stays safe and gets home as soon as the job is done.
Posted by: dagamore at August 30, 2007 02:30 AM (vdcdn)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
August 26, 2007
GRANDPA RAMBO
A man affectionately called "Grandpa Rambo" is
deploying to Iraq. He's been trying to get there for two years. His wife's reaction is so cute; it reminds me of that
old couple on the airplane:
HorneÂ’s wife Sydney West, also a public defender, said he gave her no advance notice of his decision to re-enlist, and she wasnÂ’t surprised that he opted for a combat job over anything else, including putting his legal background to use.
“I wouldn’t think he’d want to go over there to write wills,” she told the newspaper. “If he gets back alive, I’m going to kill him.”
But here's how this feel-good article ended:
As for those who might call him irresponsible for heading off to combat with two children at home, Horne said: “I can’t think of a better example to set for them.”
Good for Grandpa Rambo for answering that question the only way you can. Irresponsible? About half of people in Iraq and Afghanistan right now have children. Are we really suggesting that everyone in the armed forces is irresponsible for putting their country before their children? We wouldn't have an Army if that were the case.
Can we please stop hiding anti-military sentiment behind nonsense phrases like "As for those who might call him" (blank)? You call him that, weinery reporter, or give a full quote where he addresses the topic. Stop hiding your bias behind phrases like "some people think."
(Thanks to Conservative Grapevine for the link.)
Posted by: Sarah at
04:31 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 251 words, total size 2 kb.
1
ack! my ex's main problem with my husband (so he claims) is that my husband "abandoned his daughter" by joining the army. but i guess that's what you'd expect from a yellow bellied draft dodging malcontented hippie (not that i'm biased).
teaching your children about honor, courage and duty is more important than being at every baseball game. this is a hard life, i miss him, i worry about him, our kids miss him and the older ones worry, too. it's not that the country is more important than the children. the country is important BECAUSE of the children, and that is why my husband enlisted.
irresponsible. ha! i bet that reporter is a yellow bellied draft dodger too.
Posted by: Sis B at August 26, 2007 08:31 AM (6qNPu)
2
Doing Our Part in a Time of War
That's a column I wrote for my school paper during my last semester at CU, describing my struggle with the same question. I'd go back Reserves, too. The difference is that I'm younger and single, I was an MI troop - not a snake-eater or shooter - and I'd like to go back in as a Civil Affairs specialist. Like "Grandpa Rambo", though, that means I'd have to re-enlist rather than seek a commission.
Posted by: Eric at August 26, 2007 09:00 PM (q9wmr)
3
"You call him that, weinery reporter, or give a full quote where he addresses the topic. Stop hiding your bias behind phrases like "some people think."
You nailed it Sarah!
Posted by: tim at August 27, 2007 06:17 AM (nno0f)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
August 20, 2007
GO YE AND READ
CaliValleyGirl found a
great article on Iraq translated from German. It's quite long, but worth the read. And, as
she says, it's even-handed. It starts with
Ramadi is an irritating contradiction of almost everything the world thinks it knows about Iraq -- it is proof that the US military is more successful than the world wants to believe. Ramadi demonstrates that large parts of Iraq -- not just Anbar Province, but also many other rural areas along the Tigris and Euphrates Rivers -- are essentially pacified today. This is news the world doesn't hear: Ramadi, long a hotbed of unrest, a city that once formed the southwestern tip of the notorious "Sunni Triangle," is now telling a different story, a story of Americans who came here as liberators, became hated occupiers and are now the protectors of Iraqi reconstruction.
and gets both better and worse from there. Please go read it.
Posted by: Sarah at
02:35 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 159 words, total size 1 kb.
WHEN AND HOW?
I know everyone's BS detector is running on high after Scott Beauchamp, so maybe I'm treading heavily. But I'm puzzled by a
Newsweek article on MSNBC today. The reporter's cousin just came home from Iraq, so a homecoming article was in order. It seemed like an ordinary tale of happiness and relief until she delineated her family's fears during the previous year. And then this odd paragraph appeared:
I’d read reports of some female soldiers allegedly being raped by Iraqi insurgents—some 50 to 75 rapes, according to The New York Times. Alexia assured us that several male soldiers had volunteered to walk her home after she stood post at night. But that reassurance still couldn’t erase the images of assaults, bombs and corpses.
In the quiet words of the Virgin Mary...come again?
A google search of "raped by insurgent" brought nothing but tales from Sierra Leone. A search of "raped by Iraqi" brought horrible tales from Iraqi women, and a hit on Jessica Lynch. But aside from her, do you know of any story of a captured female coalition soldier who was raped? Who are these 50-75 women and how are they getting raped in Iraq? Getting raped by an insurgent means getting caught and captured, and I don't remember hearing about this. Please point me in the direction of the stories if I have missed them, but for now I remain completely puzzled.
My husband also pointed out that an escort on the way home from the guard tower wouldn't exactly prevent insurgent rape. Soldier-on-soldier crime, perhaps, but surely these insurgents are not scaling the walls and raping American females on duty. Something is just not right here.
I also find it hard to believe there are heat-of-the-battle rapes going on in Iraq, where females are getting raped while their male counterparts are too busy firing at the bad guys. We certainly would've heard of this, right? It's the anti-war left's dream story.
If you can find this Times article or any leads on such rape stories, please let me know. Until then, I'm having a hard time believing insurgents are raping our female soldiers and getting away with it.
Posted by: Sarah at
07:27 AM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
Post contains 367 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Two lines go good together in your post; “…according to The New York Times” and “Something is just not right here.”
‘Nuff said.
Posted by: tim at August 20, 2007 09:50 AM (nno0f)
2
I hadn't read anything about Iraqi insurgent rapes either, and hubby's field would have heard about it first to investigate.
What I have heard about was Colonel Karpinski's claims of how all allied female soldiers are being raped and beaten and tortured and dying from bladder infections because of our own guys.
Posted by: airforcewife at August 20, 2007 10:05 AM (emgKQ)
3
I read that too and had the SAME reaction. My BS monitor clicked into overdrive.....
Posted by: Tammi at August 21, 2007 02:30 AM (F/bmV)
4
Huh? Why is it rare for news agencies to check the facts of their articles BEFORE they publish them? Probably because it is easier to just give an insincere apology when they are caught. Unfortunately my BS meter seems to go off in conjunction with just about ANY of the big news agencies.
I totally agree with Tim.
Posted by: Lemon Stand at August 21, 2007 06:33 AM (JROsA)
5
It is easy to confuse a Jihadi website with the New York Times. Surely the person that is writing the article was confusing the two. There are plenty reports of Jihadi's raping US female soldiers on jihadi websites.
Honest mistake. NY Times...Jihadi Today...who can tell the difference?
Posted by: Soldier's Dad at August 21, 2007 11:19 AM (wZlP1)
6
Remember, this is from the same profession that reported the capture of a 12-inch American action figure and accuses Coalition troops of throwing unfired bullets at Iraqi crones.
Posted by: Tom W. at August 21, 2007 12:43 PM (rvJjw)
7
"walk her home after she stood post" presumably, she stood her post with a waepon, most likely an M-16. how was she not able to defend herself while walking but she could defend the post from attack. This story is completely false. I will tell you if a single American woman had been reported to have been raped by an insurgent, our troops would gone into overdrive to both protect these women and find the perpetrators.
Posted by: a guy at August 21, 2007 03:32 PM (JMrDo)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
53kb generated in CPU 0.0488, elapsed 0.121 seconds.
49 queries taking 0.1109 seconds, 180 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.