October 29, 2004
BRING THE LOVE!
Couldn't resist quoting
this:
We may see some brief flicker of the insurgent flame yet, some last-ditch effort before Tuesday. If so it would be a good time to remember this: immediately after Al Qaeda castrated Spain with a few well-placed bombs the organization released a tape claiming the victory. That tape included this phrase: "You love life and we love death,." Anyone who ever served in the US Armed Forces knew the instant response to that, heard George C. Scott quote Patton, establishing the obvious common ground between American Forces and Al Qaeda corpses: "Your job is not to die for your country. Your job is to make the other poor bastard die for his country".
"You Love life, we love death"
The Marines will bring the love to Fallujah.
Posted by: Sarah at
01:25 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 137 words, total size 1 kb.
October 23, 2004
MIXING
Apparently there's some talk about whether to permanently assign
support units including women to combat units. I am not a big fan of this idea. It has nothing to do with an aversion to women in combat; since I don't think that a woman's life is any more valuable than a man's life, I have no problem with women dying in war. However, I do have a nagging feeling about the effect that women have had on the military.
After reading The Kinder, Gentler Military: How Political Correctness Affects Our Ability to Win Wars, I gave up any notion that I should be a 19K. (I still would like to, but I don't think I should be allowed to.) I still argue with myself about what I think the role of women in our military should be, and my mind isn't completely made up. But there's a big problem coming out of OIF that doesn't have a solution: lust.
I almost typed love, but that's probably not right. I think what happens downrange is closer to what happens on The Real World or The Bachelor, where two people who are put in close quarters and extraordinary situations become convinced that they're in love. And when men and women are serving together, away from their families, for over a year, they bond in ways that alarm those of us back on the homefront. I have a few friends who work in our legal center, and they deal on a daily basis with divorces that stem from deployment. Sometimes the soldiers meet someone new downrange -- sometimes even getting her pregnant -- and they come back and kick their wives out. Sometimes soldiers get caught having sex when they're supposed to be on guard duty, which is dangerous to everyone they're supposed to be guarding.
There are only two or three females on my husband's entire camp in Iraq, and I prefer it that way. I don't think my husband would be interested in straying -- heck, I had to drag his disgusted-with-girls butt into the relationship in the first place -- but there are many men who might be tempted. And believe me, I'm not blind to the fact that it's a two-way street: the wives who are left behind are surrounded by temptation every day, and many of them ain't that virtuous.
The mixing of the sexes is hard for today's military, especially for hooah males in a PC culture. But sending men and women downrange together for a year has consequences, especially when soldiers only call their families once a month. I personally don't think we need more fuel on that fire.
Posted by: Sarah at
07:05 AM
| Comments (13)
| Add Comment
Post contains 445 words, total size 3 kb.
1
As far as I understand,the Israelies train,or used to train,women in their military but don't post them to positions where they would be in combat.I may be mistaken but the reasons weren't for that people might get up to what Nature equipped them to do ,but for reasons more to do with the fear of women getting hurt and killed in combat.........A problem(just ONE of many) with our Canadian military was the politically correct decision to recruit only to certain profiles. This means,so many percentages of people of colour(p.c. term,not mine) women,Aboriginals,but I'm not sure about gays.Nothing bad about trying to recruit people of different backrounds and sexes,but these were percentages that had to be met.No ifs or buts,these percentages had to be met. They weren't and now the Forces are behind the eight-ball with recruits. Besides the fact that a lot of younger people would rather not join the Forces and this is one of the several reasons that we don't even have our manpower up to the level they are funded for.
Posted by: big al at October 24, 2004 12:45 AM (rOeYn)
2
I believe women should train for combat. What if all the men in battle need us, or they're getting their collective asses kicked, god forbid. I don't want to be weeping and wailing at the mess tent, I want to be getting ready to go into battle.
In WWI the Russians had an all female battalion. They brought their small children with them. I think this is the best way to work it - minus the children, of course! Train females as their own battalion that could replace one of the male ones. I do not think combat battalions should be integrated. First, you have the sex issue, which leads to the love issue, which leads to the men putting themselves at GREATER risk to protect the women among them.
As I've often said, men are a different species. And the ones we're fighting are a particularly nasty, unpleasant strain. I think women would have less trouble killing them than men, due to the way they would treat us and our sisters and daughters if they won. Remember the Amazons!
One more problem with women in combat. Our bodies, unfortunately degrade under field conditions while men grow stronger. We would have to have an unbreakable supply chain as well as showers to keep from developing infections, etc. In that way, biology is against us.
Posted by: Oda Mae at October 24, 2004 04:54 AM (Rm+i2)
3
I am in complete agreement with you. Someone once told me that in a "life and death struggle" the urge to procreate becomes even stronger. If you think your existence might come to an end soon, the desire to leave an offspring behind to carry on the bloodline becomes overwhelming.
At first, I didn't think much of it other than it excuses lust. But I'm convinced that it is true which means the final answer is that there is a lot of lust going on downrange.
I have seen marriages fall apart; relationships back home fail while new relationships here form. Like you, I don't think they have anything binding them other than "the moment" and the vast majority of the time these relationships fail when everyone gets back home.
In my case, I'm too old for this crap and (as my wife reminds me often) can't afford a girlfriend with all my hobbies. :-)
Posted by: R1 at October 24, 2004 06:24 AM (PXESm)
4
Oda Mae,
you need to brush up on your WW2 history before launching into discussions of women in the military. Soviets (not Russians, by the way, in case if you didn't know - there is a difference) had an integrated army where women served in combat with men. Women received the highest military honors too. There were sniper women, there were female machine gunners, etc, etc. Oh, and women were widely represented in the insurgency. Oh, there was no "showers" or anything like that. And that didn't stop women from being able to fight.
Posted by: Sen at October 24, 2004 11:26 PM (7SZHE)
5
Our bodies, unfortunately degrade under field conditions while men grow stronger. We would have to have an unbreakable supply chain as well as showers to keep from developing infections, etc. In that way, biology is against us.
And they say guys are the sexist pigs.
On a serious note, Sarah, I'm interested in your take on the missing explosives from Al Qaqaa. I find it difficult to see how such a widely-known site was unguarded, and how Jerry Bremer kept the knowledge that the weapons were missing from the administration - apparently, it is unclear whether the president was informed. I bring this up because this explosive is likely the source of the IEDs in Iraq, and if so then this screw-up is a direct cause of the casualties we are taking.
Posted by: Coriolanus at October 25, 2004 12:52 PM (5d0TU)
6
Coriolanus, I think Sarah has already answered your question: Clinton took them and gave them to Kerry and his friends. Bush is trying to save her husbands ass from these evildoers. Dead soldiers are the result of people hating freedom. Dead babys are just future terrorists, so they need to die sooner or later anyway. And just because Bush doesn't know something doesn't make him bad. He doesn't know a lot of things and people are still dying. So what's your point?
Posted by: dc at October 25, 2004 03:41 PM (fLlQ8)
7
dc, you were asked once to leave my website. Please don't return.
Posted by: Sarah at October 25, 2004 04:13 PM (2KPfM)
Posted by: Coriolanus at October 25, 2004 07:03 PM (5d0TU)
9
The stuff from Al Qaqa isn't likey being used for IEDs. It's possible but not in great numbers. I think the stuff from Al Qaqa was RMX or HMX-I can't remember which but it's highly explosive real hight tech stuff. Most IEDs are old 155mm artillery rounds or mortar rounds wired up with make shift detonators. I've heard of that real high tech stuff like that being used in Baghdad but in most of Iraq IEDs are a poor man's weapon.
Posted by: Blue 6 at October 26, 2004 01:23 AM (TPtS1)
10
Sen, please note the following:
Russia - During World War I, some Russian women took part in combat even during the Czarist period. These women, motivated by a combination of patriotism and a desire to escape a drab existence, mostly joined up dressed as men. A few, however, served openly as women. “The [Czarist] government had no consistent policy on female combatants.”
http://www.warandgender.com/wgwomwwi.htm
RUSSIAN, not Soviet. WWI, not WWII. I am a WWI buff and pretty up on the history from that era. At the time of the "Battalion of Death" as the females were called, they were RUSSIANS. Perhaps I should have put "the Great War" for people with lower reading levels.
Corialanus - First of all, I would be a sexist sow. If I were sexist, that is. Secondly, as a female serving in the Army between 1992 and 1998, I was often in the field with other soldiers. The females had to be sent in every three days for a shower. This was by regulation. The reason they were sent in every three days was to avoid yeast infections, UTIs and other ob/gyn infections. Just because it's sexist, doesn't mean it isn't true! This might have changed since 1998, but I don't think so.
Does this mean women can't serve in the trenches? No, of course not. But you will have to send a lot of soldiers to the rear for medical treatment at some point if there are not showers, tampons, etc., for hygiene needs. Baby Wipes only go so far!! Could we still do it? Yes. Would women cause more of a drain on manpower and medical needs in that situation than the men? Yes.
As stated, I think women would be fine mentally in combat. But the surrounding issues need to be dealt with first. For instance, should female combat soldiers volunteer for long term birth control in case they're taken prisoner by opposing forces, or just to make sure they can remain pregnancy-free throughout the deployment?
Posted by: Oda Mae at October 26, 2004 08:59 AM (FmIVz)
11
http://www.hood-meddac.army.mil/default.asp?page=chn_fsrg1&vi=n&mnu=0
This is the latest on "Field Considerations for Female Soldiers." As you can see, the female of the species needs to pack a bit more than the male soldier!
Posted by: Oda Mae at October 26, 2004 09:07 AM (FmIVz)
12
Oda Mae, my bad, it _was_ ww1 in your post which I read as ww2.
My original point still stands - women served widely in combat in all positions without showers, tampons, etc.
Posted by: Sen at October 27, 2004 10:27 PM (UGEqL)
13
I'm usually in agreement with you, but this entry is not one of those times.
So, because *some* men (and women) can't keep their pants on, no women should serve on the front lines lol? You have to be kidding me. There are good arguments out there that do support keeping women off the front lines, but this is by far the bottom of the barrel here.
First off, marriages must have trust and respect. War zone or back home, the man or woman who does not put their all into their marriage will stray eventually if he or she chooses to do so. That's an individual's problem, not a military or integration problem.
Secondly, in today's wars, there are no clear "in the rear with the gear" areas as there were in my father's time in Vietnam - and even then at times that line was blurred. Today, women ARE on the front lines in Iraq and Afghanistan regardless of whether or not America (or insecure Army wives) are ready for it. Every person who enters the Army learns to be a soldier first (you know, fire their weapon, toss a grenade) and do their MOS second.
My husband was a 1SG in Iraq and led both male and female soldiers. Women in his company were on the front lines out in Ramadi - even when they were on their FOB. Their FOB was mortared daily and at least one occasion, killed several people and injured close to twenty. Women also went out on missions right along the sides of their male Marine and Army counterparts. I'd suggest doing a search for 1st Infantry Division's 1st Brigade Combat Team's Team Lioness to learn more about the exceptional job these women performed. A job that saved countless lives (possibly my husband's included) by keeping tensions from rising by having female soldiers handle Iraqi women and children instead of male soldiers.
These women did jobs many men wouldn't want to do and did so with dignity, integrity and gallantry. To discredit their service by implying they shouldn't be there because of "lust" - lust of someone else, not even their own, is appalling in the age in which we live.
There are heroes among us and many are women. The insecurities of Army wives who may "worry" if their husbands have to serve with women aside - women are there, they are already on the front lines and they are making America proud.
Posted by: Army wife at October 30, 2004 04:43 PM (/1PdN)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
October 19, 2004
NO HOOAH?
All I wanted to say in response to
Greyhawk's vote was HOOAH, but his comments section wouldn't allow it! Now that's a glitch worth looking into: a milblog where you can't say hooah...
Posted by: Sarah at
04:06 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 37 words, total size 1 kb.
October 17, 2004
FRAG
Deskmerc also has a problem with people whose only knowledge of the military comes from movies. He comments on the absurdity -- both militarily and socially -- of the following nutjob quote:
Next group will be smarter, don't go to jail for 5 years, just take out the lieutenant
Boy howdy. Soldiers are requesting spots in my husband's platoon, which must mean they like their PL and PSG. But anyone who took out my lieutenant would have to answer to me after he answered to the Army.
Posted by: Sarah at
04:15 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 89 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Speaking as someone who is "downrange", if someone followed this advice I daresay they wouldn't make it very far either. Damn those tragic hunting accidents!
Posted by: R1 at October 18, 2004 03:19 PM (PXESm)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
October 10, 2004
October 09, 2004
CIB
I agree with Greyhawk that it's time to
reevaluate the Combat Infantryman's Badge.
UPDATE:
Oh, crap. I'm still not used to the Gazette's new format with ten billion authors. My deepest apologies to John of Argghhh! for misatributing his work. In fact, I agree with John, since he was the one who wrote this post. I also loved Grim's anecdote in the comments section:
So I showed my wife this picture you lead off with tonight, hoping to teach her about the injustice you cite.
Pointing at the three guys sweeping the area with their rifles, I said, "Dear, do these look like infantry or cavalry to you?"
"Cavalry," she said.
"Really?" I asked. "What makes you say that?"
"Well, look how short they are!" she answered.
Posted by: Sarah at
05:10 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 129 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I really need to mention this in my posts when I guest-post on Mudville - you agree with John of Argghhh! I'm not sure that Greyhawk has a dog in this fight!
Posted by: John of Argghhh! at October 09, 2004 06:00 PM (10rgs)
2
Each branch should have its own combat badge. It can't be a CIB if its given to non-Infantry.
Posted by: Tanker Schreiber at October 11, 2004 11:59 AM (Lsg7m)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
October 08, 2004
TAPS
Here's the Stars and Stripes coverage of
SGT Tyler Prewitt's memorial service.
(A heartfelt welcome to SGT Prewitt's friends and family. For more, read how I knew him and my thoughts on his memorial.)
Posted by: Sarah at
02:44 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 36 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Sarah - what a beautifully touching story of Tyler. Through your previous writing I surmised what type of person he was, but knowing what happened to him and how others view him - I feel even more strongly now. What a good person we have lost. I'm sorry. I think it's great that his organs have helped others to live. A true hero for America.
Posted by: Kathleen A at October 08, 2004 08:07 AM (vnAYT)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
October 05, 2004
MEMORIAL
I just got back from the memorial service for
SGT Tyler Prewitt. I really wish I had gotten to know him better than our ten emails; he seems like an amazing guy. And his is a story that everyone should hear.
He left college after 9/11 and tried to join the infantry but was rejected because of his colorblindness. He then became a combat medic and deployed to both Kosovo and Iraq. Everyone spoke highly of him, saying he was always on the front lines, even when he would get reminded that as a medic he was supposed to hang back! They joked that he was the only medic with a sniper scope on his rifle; one of his fellow Soldiers said that Prewitt was equally a medic and a warrior.
In fact, his vehicle was hit by an RPG while he was trying to move forward to see if medical assistance was needed. They said that he remained calm and was instructing the people around him how to care for his wounds. His family came to Landstuhl and had to make the difficult decision to switch off the machines, but even in death Tyler Prewitt was saving lives. He became an organ donor, and his organs were used to save no less than seven other people at Landstuhl. I -- and his family -- take great comfort in knowing that his death brought so much life to others.
I wish I had known Tyler Prewitt better because he sounds like a wonderful man and the type of Soldier I would like to know. I'm happy that he touched my life in such a small way and that I got to hear his story.
Posted by: Sarah at
09:16 AM
| Comments (13)
| Add Comment
Post contains 286 words, total size 2 kb.
1
God bless his family. We have some unbelieveably fine young men and women in our military services.
I remember a story of a woman whose son's heart had been transplanted into a young woman. The lady always told people, "Isn't that young woman wonderful. She donated he entire body to keep my son's heart alive."
Posted by: Mike at October 05, 2004 09:21 AM (MqNKC)
2
Tyler was a close friend of mine here in Phoenix & a best friend to my brother in law. It means a lot to hear your kind words of a man who is a hero and touched so many lives. Be it brief, or grand... Tyler always gave his all.
Posted by: Jason Roman at October 06, 2004 02:10 AM (/ItKS)
3
Tyler was truly a model of an American soldier. I was his best friend and he told me many times how proud he was to serve his country and if giving his life was necessary to do so then he had no fear in doing that. It has been comforting to see and read the outpour that has followed his passing. God Bless every soldier who remains.
Posted by: Jen McCormick at October 06, 2004 01:07 PM (yHQa5)
4
Thank you, Jason and Jen, for writing comments here. I want you to know that Tyler touched many people, even in trivial ways, and he will not be forgotten.
Posted by: Sarah at October 06, 2004 03:29 PM (4kYUJ)
5
ALTHOUGH I WASNT PERSONALLY FRIENDS WITH TYLER, I WAS AWARE OF WHO HE WAS SINCE I WAS A 2000 GRADUATE OF GREENWAY. IT IS AMAZING TO ME THAT SO MANY BRAVE MEN AND WOMEN ARE WILLING TO RISK THEIR OWN LIVES FOR OTHERS. I AM PROUD TO BE AN AMERICAN AND PROUD TO BE FREE BECAUSE OF PEOPLE LIKE TYLER PREWITT...
Posted by: MEGAN at October 07, 2004 11:01 PM (LgZXn)
6
May God rest his soul and comfort those he left behind. The men and women who willingly serve to protect us hear at home and liberate the oppressed are surely a gift to all of us. My gratitude to these troops cnnot be expressed often or strongly enough.
Posted by: Pat in NC at October 10, 2004 11:49 AM (y/2dZ)
7
It's hard to believe that Tyler's gone. I didn't know him as long as Jen or Jeremy--I only got to know him when he was a freshman in HS and really only knew him from church--but he was an amazing young man. I'll be proud to serve in the Army that Tyler so diligently served.
Posted by: Mel at October 10, 2004 05:15 PM (I22Pl)
8
Jen, hi. I am sorry I couldn't be with you guys at home but I am studying abroad this year. In fact ironically I was not 30 miles from where Tyler was flown into. I can't believe Tyler is gone, that's such a big loss to the world. I grew up playing baseball with him every season that I can remember. He was always a leader and he always gave his all in everything he did. He was such a good guy and he will always be in my memories.
Posted by: Kevin at October 11, 2004 04:31 PM (aQ55F)
9
I knew Tyler since I was in the 8th grade and he was in 7th. Though I did not know him that well until after highschool I will always remember his great personality, goofy sense of humor and awesome laugh! I attended his funeral services and was very touched, especially by the video at the end. The song "Proud to be an American" now has greater meaning to me than it ever has. "And I am proud to be an American where at least I know I am free, and I wont forget the men who died who gave that right to me". Tyler I wont forget. Thank you for your sacrafice.
Posted by: Sarah "Sexton" Freswick at October 11, 2004 08:05 PM (rxlLT)
10
geocities.com/sgt_tylerprewitt
Posted by: chris primerano at October 13, 2004 06:24 PM (OMDE4)
11
I just read the news today...
I was Tyler's squad leader during our 91W training at Fort Sam Houston. I knew Tyler to be a strong and determined soldier and medic who proudly excelled in his military career. I am preparing to deploy in November with the 1-128th Inf to the same area that took Tyler from us. I will hold him fast in my memory and serve this country with the same seadfast conviction and determination that Tyler did as the only proper memorial to his name. My most sincere and heartfelt condolences to his family and friends. I wish I had known him for longer than our four months in Texas. I am honored to have known him at all. God bless you all.
Posted by: Mitch Knapmiller at October 17, 2004 04:27 PM (nit9f)
12
Tyler was one of my heroes growing up, and is even more so now. I wish I had half his courage. Even though he relentlessly beat me at video games, I'll never forget my cousin or what he did with his life. God bless him.
Posted by: Andy at October 24, 2004 09:43 PM (I+gup)
Posted by: challenge at June 23, 2005 11:09 PM (6+mWx)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
October 02, 2004
TP
"Someone from your post died in Iraq this week, but he was someone from another unit," Mom said after dinner. "Oh. Who was it?" I asked from the other room. "Someone named
SGT Tyler Prewitt."
TP.
SGT Prewitt first emailed me from Iraq in June, to ask for help with getting a transcript. We wrote back and forth a couple of times to get all of his education records straight, so when he decided to register for online classes in August, he contacted me again. He had just emailed me because he was worried he was too busy soldiering to concentrate on the class. Ten days before that RPG.
His emails were always signed TP.
His memorial is Tuesday, and I plan on going. I wonder if his family could ever imagine that his school representative, someone he barely knew, is weeping.
MORE TO GROK:
Here's my first chance to see TP's face. Surprisingly enough, that's exactly what I had imagined.
Posted by: Sarah at
04:12 PM
| Comments (13)
| Add Comment
Post contains 163 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Someone in Florida that only knows him from what you've shared is weeping too.
Posted by: Tammi at October 02, 2004 06:15 PM (UOdfZ)
2
Sarah I am sorry for your loss. We are not in control of who touches our lives, even if briefly, and we are also not in control of how deeply someone can touch your heart, even if their touch was brief. I'm sure his family doesn't know...but your tears and thoughts are out there for them to feel. And my tears are with yours.
Posted by: Kathleen A at October 02, 2004 09:27 PM (vnAYT)
3
Crap Crap
Why is it always the best who must go? DOH cause they are all the best! Add my tears to yours and tell the family that normal folk know....
Posted by: LarryConley at October 03, 2004 12:36 AM (aontM)
4
Stay strong, Sarah; TP's family will need you...
Jim
Posted by: Jim Shawley at October 03, 2004 12:37 AM (a0DGD)
5
This never gets any easier when a soldier dies. I am always astounded when I read the background info on these brave soldiers. I always wonder were did we find all of these amazing brave men and women. Thanks Sarah for making Tyler more than just a number. Regrets Toni
Posted by: Toni at October 04, 2004 08:46 AM (SHqVu)
6
Sarah, it was my online sociology class that Tyler was taking. There are several others in Iraq in that class, as well. Tyler was doing well and then we stopped hearing from him. I've written his family with the condolences of the class.
Posted by: Dr. Rosenthal at October 04, 2004 09:17 AM (68JBf)
7
I knew of Tyler only as a friend of a friend. That friend is my girlfriend. Her name is Kayla, and after she found out I think she has cried everyday since. I never knew Tyler, but I know now, for sure, he must have been a great man. The sweetest, most honest, most wonderful, person I know, cared for him on a level that only a few friendships reach. I am very truly sorry, I know we all are. But there's something we all need to be, for Tyler, above all; proud.
Posted by: Chris at October 08, 2004 04:19 AM (r+Jbe)
8
Hi!
My husband and I just found out yesterday.I am really sorry!!! We both know Tyler from Vilseck. He took over my Husbands job as 2/2 Scout Medic. The both of them had served in Kosovo with eachother. My husband is really sad, and so am I. He was a good Person! We're really sorry for his family and wish them only the best !!!!!!!
Posted by: Judith Craig at October 08, 2004 06:24 AM (HIHpb)
9
I am very touched by what you have written about Tyler. Yes, he was a very amazing man. He meant way more to me than many ever knew, maybe even him. I miss him dearly but am so proud of him. I have always appreciated my freedom but now even more: knowing that wonderful people like him are giving their life's for it.
Posted by: Kayla at October 09, 2004 11:28 PM (bjHHc)
10
Tyler was our nephew. We live in Cody, Wyoming,
and have just returned from Tyler's services. Our
whole family appreciates the overwhelming support
that has been shown. Tyler was extremely proud to
be in the military and his whole family was
extremely proud of him. We will miss him.
Posted by: Ray and Stephanie Stockhill at October 10, 2004 09:44 PM (7Z5Vz)
11
I knew Tyler since I was in the 8th grade and he was in 7th. Though I did not know him that well until after highschool I will always remember his great personality, goofy sense of humor and awesome laugh! I attended his funeral services and was very touched, especially by the video at the end. The song "Proud to be an American" now has greater meaning to me than it ever has. "And I am proud to be an American where at least I know I am free, and I wont forget the men who died who gave that right to me". Tyler I wont forget. Thank you for your sacrafice.
Posted by: Sarah Freswick at October 11, 2004 07:45 PM (rxlLT)
12
www. geocities.com/sgt_tylerprewitt
Posted by: Chris Primerano at October 13, 2004 06:17 PM (OMDE4)
13
I was stationed in Germany with TP, TP, myself and our other friend Luke were always together. I will never forget the way he laughed, and all the other funny thigs he did. I just wanted everyone to know that Luke and I are taking care of eachother through these hard times. We will never forget TP. I Love You Tyler.
SPC Roger Jones
Posted by: Roger Jones at October 25, 2004 07:53 AM (tVaRJ)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
83kb generated in CPU 0.0199, elapsed 0.1022 seconds.
55 queries taking 0.0883 seconds, 234 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
