June 20, 2006
SQUEAKY
Many people who work for the Army in certain aspects -- finance, housing, health clinic come to mind -- hate their jobs because if someone's in their office, he's probably mad. My husband realized this when he started working in Finance: it used to frustrate him that people always came in guns blazing, so he and I have always tried to be extra understanding and extra benefit-of-the-doubt-giving in these offices. But we're slowly learning the lesson of the squeaky wheel.
The first thing my husband did when we got our cell phones was to go in to Inbound Transportation and give them our phone number. They assured us that they would call us when our household goods arrived. It's been two and a half weeks since then, and we've started getting antsy. Eleven days on an air mattress can do that do you. So my husband went by their office today to see what was going on. Our stuff has been here since 6 June, but "they didn't have our phone number." My husband watched someone write it down on a paper in our file on 2 June, but apparently that paper is lost and no one in Transportation seemed to care that much. And it gets worse: they are so busy that they can't deliver our stuff until 5 July. So we'll live in this city for six months, and our stuff will languish in storage for a month of it because they lost our phone number.
And I knew I had a bad feeling about it. Some of our friends got their stuff two weeks ago, and I knew that our stuff couldn't be this far behind. But I didn't want to be the guns-blazing type who goes into Transportation every day and demands her stuff. I figured that I would give them their space since they assured us they'd call. Silly me.
Two years ago my friend's husband didn't get his reenlistment bonus. He politely pointed this out to Finance three times, each time to no avail, and his bonus came a full year late. My husband joked that he hates when soldiers go straight to IG with asinine complaints, but my friend's husband sure would've gotten service faster if he'd headed straight to the top instead of putting faith in the system. If he'd come in guns blazing, someone would've helped him. The squeaky wheel tactic works.
I want to be an understanding and cooperative family, especially if we're staying in this system for another 16 years. But I am already tired of getting screwed over. There are medical appointments if you bark loud enough. Reenlistment bonuses come when you shout. And your household goods get delivered a month earlier if you pester Transportation.
From now on, I guess I'm squeaky.
Posted by: Sarah at
02:19 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 467 words, total size 3 kb.
1
Allow me to regale you with the story of the Transportation Management Office (TMO) @ McClellan AFB circa 1979. I was there to arrange transportation to a Temp. Duty (TDY) assignment. Ahead of me was a crusty old E-7, berating the E-3 behind the counter up one side and down the other. All the while the E-3 just smiled and nodded. When I went up to him I asked why were you able to maintain your demeanor so well. He told me the married E-7's orders were for Rheinmein AFB, and to guess where the household goods were going....... Can you say Tae Gu Korea??
And what is the lesson learned?
Never ever piss-off any one in Transportation, or Finance
Posted by: BubbaBoBobBrain at June 20, 2006 08:27 PM (8ruhu)
2
Hey, I work for the Army as a civilian now...and I cringe EVERY time I hear of a new "solution" that government's supposed to "provide" for us.
In spite of the new National Security Personnel System, which is supposed to improve the quality of civilian employees within the Department of Defense, I maintain that if the system's broken, it's broken at the top.
I've been to just about every leadership/management program available starting with a four year experience at West Point to the Army's equivalent to Command and General Staff College for civilians. They certainly talk a good game and if we could operate at 50% efficiency, I'd say that we'd be making major inroads into solving some of the problems that you've discussed right here.
Until the Army decides it's time to get better and start hacking the deadwood at the top of the tree in order to allow the younger, more capable (interested?) employees to move up the chain we're still looking at years of lukewarm efficiency.
Hope your stuff arrives in good shape!
MajorDad1984
Posted by: MajorDad1984 at June 28, 2006 02:01 AM (j7S/Q)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
June 14, 2006
YAY
Posted by: Sarah at
02:24 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 2 words, total size 1 kb.
June 09, 2006
ON POST
The first time we moved together, away from our college town and to our first duty station, the first move of many to come, my husband surprised me by bringing along our Tom Petty CD and playing
"Time to Move On" as we headed off. We've continued to do this every time we drive to our new post, and every time I cry as we leave the old. That is, every time until now. I honestly can't say that I was sad to leave Germany; the only thing I miss so far is Erin, Kelly, and The Girl, and I've talked to one of them on the phone about every three days anyway! (Also, can I just say how wonderful it feels to have three
friends who
seem to
miss me as much as I miss them?)
It was time to move on, and I'm so glad we did.
I love our new post. I realized that I've never been around basic trainees before. It wasn't so obvious at Knox, and there were none in Germany, but since this post is almost exclusively a training post, I've found it seems everyone is a private. And I love it. I drive around with this stupid grin on my face because I'm constantly passing formation, duffel packing, pugil sticks, bayonet training, and other extremely cute things. I love when a pack of trainees is standing in formation outside the Shopette, all clutching their AAFES bags of goodies. I even love the way the gate guards welcome us to the post every day: "Victory starts here."
But I realized yesterday as I was moving stuff out of our hotel that living off post will be a completely different experience for me. This is the first time I won't constantly be surrounded by Army. I realized I won't wake to the sound of PT, and I will have to make a special effort to drive onto post to ogle at basic trainees. For many wives, moving off post comes as a relief, but it saddens me. I love on post.
Posted by: Sarah at
04:15 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 350 words, total size 2 kb.
KOS
Over the weekend, we caught
Markos Zuniga on Tim Russert. Overall I thought he did a good job of presenting his side without making me want to smash the TV, but there was one thing he said that really didn't sit right with me. Russert asked Kos about his military service, and he had this to say (clip
here):
I think one of the tragedies of the war right now is that so many people like me, people who came from lower socioeconomic status, from the barrios or the ghettos or the trailer parks or low income areas use the military, which is a very colorblind society, very meritocratic, use the military as a way to build their self esteem, to grow as a human being, and to learn very valuable life skills, and come out of it with money for college. And this is what I did, and it was very effective in helping me get to where I am today. I would not be the person I am today without my military service -- I'm extremely proud of it -- and it just pains me to see how many lower income people now do not view the military as an option because, clearly, join the military, get shipped to Iraq: it's not a very attractive proposition.
Our nation has a military in order to defend the US and fight her wars. That's the whole point of a military. I hate when people act like the military should be a place where they can get free college or some extra cash for one weekend a month and not have to do any of the hard work. The military is not a summer camp where you get to know yourself and then get free college. Kos should've known that back when he joined right before the first Gulf War. The military is serious business, and anyone who joins thinking he can reap all the benefits without any of the risks is a jerk. The US doesn't front millions of dollars so some kid from the barrio can find himself. He has to fight when called to, so if he doesn't want to fight, he needs to find someone else to finance his maturation process. Period. It irks me that Kos acts like the US is oppressing low income kids because they can't have their college and eat it too. If you're not prepared to fight, the military is not for you ever, even in peacetime.
Posted by: Sarah at
03:18 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 417 words, total size 2 kb.
1
I don't think Zuniga thinks the US military is opressing minorities. As he said, it is the essentially one of the few systems that exist in the country today that is truly egalitarian in most respects. I think what he's attacking (and I don't agree with him) is the reason why the military isn't being utilized by more minorities as it was in the past. That is, a war he believes to be more for profit and not for national defense. You may disagree with this point, but I think both you and Zuniga agree that the military is a good thing.
"The US doesn't front millions of dollars so some kid from the barrio can find himself." Well, the fact is, the US does that. It's called affirmative action (and the military is the biggest proponent of affirmative action), and the US does encourage little kids from the ghetto to discover themselves in the military because a lot of times when they do discover themselves, what you get are the Colin Powell types. The military does in fact benefit a lot from little colored kids discovering themselves.
In the end though, The military is all about national defense, yes, but I think it's a little naive to say that it isn't all about the college money, especially when they advertise themselves as such. In the end, as important as it is (and as proud as I am), it's just a job, and in the end of the day, you want it to pay you.
Posted by: John at June 09, 2006 08:20 AM (PDyPy)
2
Was Kos's point that people aren't joining the military because they don't want to fight? Or was it that they don't want to fight in this particular war? Set aside your views about Iraq for a moment. You have to be able to acknowledge in the abstract that it would be possible for the country to get into a war that it shouldn't have, a war that you didn't believe was going to accomplish anything worth the price we were paying and a war that we might lose. Wouldn't it be harder for you to commit to join the military if you knew that you were going to have to fight, and possibly die, in a war like this? Well, while you may disagree, a growing majority of Americans do think about Iraq in this way. Of course that affects recruitment.
Posted by: Pericles at June 11, 2006 02:10 AM (eKf5G)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
YESTERDAY
I've been thinking a lot about
Bunker lately. It's been a year since he passed away, and I still miss him very much. I think about him often when something exciting happens in the news, so he was one of my first thoughts yesterday. He would've been so excited about Zarqawi's death. I just wish I had baking utensils or flour and eggs, for I surely would relish a "Suck it, Zarqawi" cake right about now. Maybe I can make a belated one...
Posted by: Sarah at
02:58 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 85 words, total size 1 kb.
1
In this case I think a belate cake is definitely called for. I'll be waiting for pics! Ding-dong the witch (warlock) is dead!
Posted by: Vonn at June 09, 2006 04:09 AM (dEgRi)
2
I know what you mean - and I keep Bunker's link on my site under "Soaring with the Angels", because I don't want him to fade away. He knows we're thinking of him ;-)
Posted by: Barb at June 09, 2006 09:19 AM (PGzrn)
3
Bunker was one of the greats...hard to believe it's been a year.
Posted by: david at June 12, 2006 03:58 PM (9tauC)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
55kb generated in CPU 0.0134, elapsed 0.0864 seconds.
49 queries taking 0.0775 seconds, 177 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.