March 15, 2007
CONFERENCE
Registration is underway for the Milblogs Conference! If you are planning to attend, please make sure you
go register!
Posted by: Sarah at
07:04 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 21 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I sure do wish I could go. It sounds really interesting. The timing just isn't right though. Maybe next year.
Posted by: Robin at March 15, 2007 02:28 PM (V5aG3)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
March 10, 2007
300
If you're already excited about the release of the movie
300, or if you don't know what the heck it is, you should read
Victor Davis Hanson's review of the movie. Me, I'm excited. We haven't seen a movie in the theater since Superman returned, but we might have to make an exception for this one.
Posted by: Sarah at
05:17 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 58 words, total size 1 kb.
1
We saw it last night. AMAZING movie. Equal to Braveheart in emotional impact and creation of the desire for courage and valor. And excellent dialog.
There was one scene in particular where the audience went nuts and applauded and cheered. And at the end it got a very loud ovation.
You won't regret seeing it.
Posted by: airforcewife at March 11, 2007 03:25 AM (0dU3f)
2
Ditto airforcewife, except the audience part, I live in a blue state.
I NEVER go to the movies, but I had to see these one.
Go. See. This.Movie!
Posted by: tim at March 12, 2007 03:21 AM (nno0f)
3
I went to go see this movie, however I found it too "shallow" and simplistic, but I loved the whole idea of paralleling it with America and the war on terrorism (I didn't read VDH's piece, but I assume that is what is suggested). The only thing that troubled me though is that this movie can be watched by anyone and seen basically as this call of "never give up and fight to the end, even if your position is futile and your countrymen don't agree with your POV." Okay, fine and dandy for us...but any jihadi watching this movie would nod their head in agreement too.
The whole time I was thinking...wow, this is such a propaganda film for the pro-war contigent of the war on terror. But today I spoke with someone at work, who had seen the movie and mentioned that, and he said...oh, yeah, now that you mention it, I guess it was, but otherwise I would have never thought so.
I loved the Queen's speech to the senators though...fabulous! We need Laura do make such a speech...however it only made sense 'cos the King was leading the troops. We need some Generals' wives to make speeches.
And there is nothing better than watching that movie surrounded by America's warrior class: about half the cinema or more were soldiers from the local Army base...it was pretty hooah!
Posted by: CaliValleyGirl at March 12, 2007 12:40 PM (deur4)
4
Didn't the folks who did "sin city" do this? It looks cartoonish and computer enhanced. It doesn't appeal to me.
Posted by: Tom at March 13, 2007 03:56 AM (YuwDy)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
March 08, 2007
HOOAH
Two good links I found on JackArmy:
First, some dorks tried to call recruiters and trick them into being so desperate as to let gays or druggies into the Army. Didn't work.
Second, a medic wrote about his reasons for joining the Army:
I digress a little, but people say only the bottom of the barrel go to the military but I definitely don't think that's true. A lot of my friends from college have joined because college life just wasn't for them and they're all smart kids (none of us scored lower than 99 on the ASVAB). I went to college for awhile myself, but both ran out of money (College is expensive!) and decided that it was far too dumbed down and ... hands-off to be enjoyable. I wasn't satisfied with half-sleeping in a classroom while the professor rambled on about stuff I didn't care at all about just so in 4 years I could take my $100,000 debt and get a reasonable job (which a college degree doesn't even guarantee these days). Some of us just want to do something that matters. Being a college student hardly accomplished anything -- I'd rather be out there fighting for something that shows results. Saving people from gunshot wounds, giving people gunshot wounds or leading others to do the same.
Posted by: Sarah at
05:46 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 222 words, total size 1 kb.
March 07, 2007
GOVERNMENT HEALTH CARE
I've really become a big Neal Boortz fan, and his remarks about how
the problems at Walter Reed will be everyone's problems if we have government health care hit home with me. We in the military have this government health care, and we truly understand the meaning of the phrase "you get what you pay for." I have never had any truly bad experiences with our health care system, but even the day-to-day dealings are what we'd all face under a nationalized plan. It takes at least six weeks to get a doctor's appointment, for anything whatsoever. And when it takes that long, it doesn't pay to be picky about which doctor you see, so I've never seen the same doctor more than once...except for the one in Germany whom everyone hated so her schedule was always open. It also routinely takes over an hour of waiting in line to get prescriptions filled. And records are constantly getting lost. It took me two months to request records from my hometown doctor, and then once the records finally arrived, you guess it, six weeks to get an appointment.
Boortz is right: this is what we'd all do if we had government health care. Yeah, we in the military don't pay for it, but when you don't pay, you also have no grounds to complain about being treated poorly.
MORE TO GROK:
JackArmy has great thoughts on the matter.
Posted by: Sarah at
03:39 AM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
Post contains 243 words, total size 2 kb.
1
I agree that a nationalized health care plan is a bad idea, maybe for several reasons but surely for the reasons you cited. Working in a civilian hospital definitely causes me to look at the differences on a daily basis and sometimes leaves me disappointed in the Army healthcare. However, the most troublesome aspect of this whole Walter Reed dabacle is the fact that military members DO pay for their healthcare. I've seen recruitment salary quotes with the healthcare incentive factored in...making $40,000/year look like $60,000 and so forth. It's one of the ways the Army can make staying in the Army (especially for certain ranks) at least comparable to civilian careers.
Posted by: Nicole at March 07, 2007 05:07 AM (Mk6ZZ)
Posted by: Nicole at March 07, 2007 05:09 AM (Mk6ZZ)
3
Which is a big part of the reason hubby and I spent 3000$ of our own money three times to do home births rather than rely on military healthcare.
Posted by: airforcewife at March 07, 2007 07:07 AM (0dU3f)
4
“Yeah, we in the military don't pay for it, but when you don't pay, you also have no grounds to complain about being treated poorly.”
Your husband is in the Army, he pays for it. It may not come out of his paycheck, but he pays for it. Same with the guy who gets his leg blown off in Iraq, or gets shot in Afghanistan or breaks his leg at Camp Pendleton, etc, etcÂ…
Military health care should be the best this country has to offer and maybe more people need to complain about it till it is.
Dismount soapbox.
Posted by: tim at March 07, 2007 07:43 AM (nno0f)
5
A government-moving toward privatization-with Republicans from top to bottom, does a poor job of serving its citizens and its people.
What an astonishing conclusion on your part!
Posted by: John at March 07, 2007 12:33 PM (v4s/2)
6
This is a tough one. Don't forget that not long ago, the plan was to close Walter Reed. When you're going to close a facility, you stop spending money on it.
IMO, the Army medical system is a victim of its own success. A war or two ago, many of our soldiers would not have survived their wounds let alone make it to Walter Reed.
I guess the point I wanted to make was that the military is composed of humans; making human mistakes. I used to think the Army hospitals were terrible until I had surgery in a civilian one. I've met some of the best and worst doctors/dentists in the Army. I should tell you my dentist story; he could pull my teeth anytime.
Posted by: R1 at March 07, 2007 05:51 PM (xexA1)
7
I agree, R1: my dentist in Germany was the best and I wish I could keep him forever. I don't think the quality of personnel suffers as much as the desire to make the patient happy. Soldiers think nothing of waiting in line for an hour, so why speed things up? And a broken down section of Walter Reed was most likely a step UP from whatever these folks were living in in Iraq. I think that leaves little incentive for improvement.
Posted by: Sarah at March 08, 2007 02:25 AM (vrR+j)
8
If our government shouldn't pay for the health care of our wounded, then what in the hell should it pay for?
Maybe commercials about how much we support the troops?
Posted by: John at March 08, 2007 05:43 PM (8h7sz)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
52kb generated in CPU 0.1828, elapsed 0.6986 seconds.
49 queries taking 0.687 seconds, 181 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.