July 15, 2005
SAJAK
Raise your hand if you knew that Pat Sajak is a right-wing nutjob. I sure didn't, but I've had a fun time reading some of his
archived articles.
But what's the deal with the new Wheel of Fortune? It was so much simpler when I used to watch it with my grandma; now I can't figure out what's going on a lot of the time. Since when did they get rid of bidding on dog statues and stuff?
Posted by: Sarah at
03:31 AM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 80 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Wow! I always thought he was a bimbo...he is really funny.
Posted by: CaliValleyGirl at July 15, 2005 07:06 AM (i/t0u)
2
My hand is raised. But I don't watch anymore because it is sooooo dumb. I guess it's still on cause it is an icon by now.
Posted by: Ruth H at July 15, 2005 05:44 PM (g2+/W)
Posted by: Mike at July 15, 2005 05:54 PM (zUGwv)
4
Sorry, "right-wing nutjob" is one of my favorite terms of endearment for the Right; I picked it up from that JibJab cartoon and I use it tongue-in-cheek all the time.
Posted by: Sarah at July 15, 2005 06:45 PM (5IRdp)
5
i knew, i knew!
i still prefer "jeopardy" to "wheel" tho.
Posted by: annie the right wing nutjob at July 16, 2005 05:01 PM (UCIZt)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
July 13, 2005
I CRY FOR YOU
Charles Johnson posted a link on LGF, with no fanfare or explanation. I almost didn't click on it, but I was intrigued by the poetic name. And as I read
But None Ever Cried for Me, I was filled with a sense of horror and shame.
In the words spoken by these politicians I hear affirmation that my child's blood, a Jewish child's blood, is of a different color. I shivered as I heard London's mayor, Livingstone, lamented that this was "mass murder... by terrorists bent on indiscriminate... slaughter... aimed at ordinary working-class Londoners...." and an ugly thought entered my mind.
What of the slaughter of my children, 'ordinary, working-class' brothers and sisters in Haifa and Jerusalem, Ashdod and Ashkelon? What about my working-class Jewish fellow citizens whose simple wants and needs are the same as those in London? Where is the determination to eradicate the vermin who have turned Israeli streets into infernos as they blow up buses, restaurants and malls?
Do those murdering and maiming my children deserve a state of their own from which they can peacefully continue to bathe my country in blood? Why are the snakes in London to be pursued and eradicated, while those who have killed young Jewish mothers, Jewish infants and the unborn are to be rewarded and feted as heroes in every corner of every continent in the universe?
We've let those Islamobarbarians kill in Israel for far longer than we've noticed. In our eyes, the Islamofascist fight started in 2001, but it's been going on for far longer than that. We pretend somehow that they're not the same people killing in Iraq and New York. But they are. They're the same sombitches, and they need to be stopped too.
Israel, I cry for you. I really do.
Posted by: Sarah at
05:14 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 305 words, total size 2 kb.
July 08, 2005
July 04, 2005
F YEAH
I forgot what I had written last year, so I checked:
last year's Independence Day post was hard for me too. It's like I want to say something profound, but every day is 4th of July when you love your country as much as I do. However, we did celebrate in a significant way: by watching
"A Taste of Freedom" and
Team America. Twice. And next year, we'll be celebrating Independence Day in our own country. I can't wait.
Posted by: Sarah at
06:27 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 83 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I just read your 4th of July post from last year...and your essay from MS 100 is spot on. Nothing like spending time in another country to develop a greater appreciation for what we have in America. Hee hee...and I love how you somehow got suckered into getting the full on MRS degree in military sciences.
Posted by: CaliValleyGirl at July 05, 2005 06:52 AM (Zfuiq)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
June 28, 2005
MESSAGE
Via
Amritas I found a
fascinating old article about a challenge I'd never even considered: how do you write a message for 10,000 years in the future? This is the problem the Department of Energy is working on for warning about nuclear waste.
Designing a "Keep Out" sign that lasts for 10,000 years and still holds meaning is not an easy task.
After all, about 10,000 years ago, the Sahara was a fertile savanna, and humans were just beginning to put down their spears and figure out how to grow food. Ten thousand years from now, Earth could conceivably be populated by extraterrestrials.
There's another website chronicling the magnitude of difficulty in writing this message. It's a mind-boggling task.
Posted by: Sarah at
11:42 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 121 words, total size 1 kb.
1
If they have lost language and the technogy to determine the danger, they will lack the ability to dig through the plug. At any rate, within 700 years the wastes will be below the average for the ore bodys they came from. This is just a boondogle to keep a bunch of academics employed.
Posted by: Walter E. Wallis at June 28, 2005 01:30 PM (xX0fS)
2
Yeah, what Walter said. And, as it turns out, I'm just selfish enough to not care. If we're not around as a people in 10,000 years to remember that some nasty stuff is there then I just don't care.
Wow, that's cold, but what Walter said is true, if they don't have the technology to know it's there they won't have the technology to punch through to it.
Kalroy
Posted by: Kalroy at June 28, 2005 02:05 PM (9RG5y)
3
My kid and I got a kick out of this. Her comments: "They need to start a mythology among the people there.
The mythology would be there as long as the people are. And if aliens or somebody comes along after when the people are gone, well, screw 'em. [She's not real ladylike sometimes when it's just her and me.] ... Only seven languages? They need to have every language they can think of! Heck, make up one!" She wishes her Contemporary Issues teacher (it was Current Events in my day) had known about this because it probably would have been the basis of a cool project.
Posted by: Laura at July 04, 2005 12:07 AM (ezAS6)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
FREEDOM
There are things in this world that I hate to see. I absolutely hate seeing ignorant stuff like this...

I feel disgusted when I see blatantly racist stuff like this...

And Ted Rall consistently has the ability to make me want to puke...

But the beauty of our country is that people have the right and ability to say whatever they want, no matter how vile it may be. I may be filled with rage at the sight of these drawings, but I'm proud that my country is a place where anyone can speak his mind. When we're free to speak, we're free to seek the truth. Mark Steyn expresses this same pride in his recent article on flag burning:
For my own part, I believe that, if someone wishes to burn a flag, he should be free to do so. In the same way, if Democrat senators want to make speeches comparing the U.S. military to Nazis and the Khmer Rouge, they should be free to do so. It's always useful to know what people really believe.
Do I enjoy seeing this on the streets of Detroit?

Of course not, but I certainly don't want to ban it. I believe that when people are allowed freedom of expression, their uppance will come if others don't like it.
Again Mark Steyn:
Banning flag desecration flatters the desecrators and suggests that the flag of this great republic is a wee delicate bloom that has to be protected. It's not. It gets burned because it's strong.
[...]
That's the point: A flag has to be worth torching. When a flag gets burned, that's not a sign of its weakness but of its strength. If you can't stand the heat of your burning flag, get out of the superpower business.
Our flag gets burned because our country is important in this world. Go look at the montage of burning American flags around the world and feel proud that our country has had such an impact. A burning American flag is a sign of our strength.
Posted by: Sarah at
09:04 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 343 words, total size 3 kb.
June 14, 2005
HAPPY FLAG DAY

Posted by: Sarah at
02:47 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 6 words, total size 1 kb.
May 23, 2005
DEATH OF CIVILITY
When
Tim left blogging, he did so because of what he calls "death of civility". Perhaps I am not old enough to notice any trends over time, but I have noticed people acting far differently than I would.
On our cruise we participated in an organized game of Scattergories. We split into five teams of six players and went to work. One of our categories was "foreign cities", which was a cinch for us. We used the name of a German city near us, knowing that it would never be a duplicate. Well, my husband and I got accused of cheating; the other teams refused to accept the name of a city they'd never heard of, saying that we must have made it up. We were steaming mad because to us our honor and integrity had been called into question, military values we take quite seriously. Our teammates were the oldest players in the room, two couples who were roughly 40 and 60 years old. The older gentleman threw a fit on our behalf, saying it was disgraceful that the other players in the room distrusted our word when we lived in Germany with the military. But in the end the young people in the room were not to be swayed. The six of us on our team left the game disgusted: twenty people thought that we cared more about winning a game than truth and honor. Twenty people thought that we were either too stupid to know the names of real German cities or too deceitful to be trusted. Twenty people thought that our accepting another team's word that avocado is a real ice cream flavor in Colorado was more natural than their accepting the name of a city that can be confirmed by any map. It was the death of civility.
I was reminded of that Scattergories incident and Tim's values when I read this exchange between a reporter and a Bush spokesman today. You don't speak like this to people in public. You don't accuse people of lying unless you have good reason to. And when you're a reporter, you really shouldn't let your complete distaste for the administration show like this.
The death of civility is all around us.
Posted by: Sarah at
04:21 AM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
Post contains 379 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Considering some of the comments left at deployed milbloggers blogs I'm not terribly surprised by your comments. It does surprise me though how heartless and cruel the anti-war types can be. For supposed peace lovers they are a violent group.
Posted by: toni at May 23, 2005 09:53 AM (SHqVu)
2
Not really so surprising, now that I think about it. To be civil one has to be civilized; one has to believe in civilization.
Clearly, those on the left do not. They no longer believe in Western civilization, indeed they loathe and despise it. That's exactly their point, and our problem. So no surprise that they behave like uncivilized persons, for that's what they are.
Yes, things are different now. You have a large swath of Western citizens who despise their own society, who secretly yearn for it to die. While this is not unprecedented in human history, it's not common (for obvious reasons, it's fatal) and it is also rather new to the West. It certainly wasn't like this when I was a child (born in 1954).
Civility isn't dead, it's just badly wounded. The same could be said for civilization itself. This is not a time to leave the field to the barbarians, it's a time to bind the wounds and fight, because we are in a fight for our survival.
The real war, the war that threatens our very existence, isn't the fight against radical Islam. The mullahs and their nutcases can, at the most, greatly inconvenience us. The real war is the one right here at home, the one that was being fought on that cruise ship. That's the one where the stakes are survival.
Note how, ever since the election, things have not quieted down. If anything, it's gotten worse in some ways here at home. I think it's because the real war is just starting to ramp up.
God bless us all, we're gonna need it.
Posted by: DSmith at May 23, 2005 10:32 AM (cN0XN)
3
Glad you guys had a great vacation - enjoyed the pictures that you posted. We went to St. Croix last year (I am not a good cruise person) and had a blast - very similar water!
Anyways, I feel the same way about the death of civility. It's gotten to the point with me that I dislike discussing the President, politics, or the war with people that I know will disagree with me.
Actually, I don't mind the rational disagreements - we all have them, and we walk away happy. But the vile spitting foaming at the mouth invective I hear nowadays makes it not worth any of our whiles.
And like you, there's no greater insult to me than to question my integrity...
Bryan
Posted by: Bryan Strawser at May 23, 2005 10:37 AM (0WnvF)
4
Er, just out of curiosity...what was the city?
Posted by: Jason at May 23, 2005 06:18 PM (Xo3eX)
5
Well gee how about the fact that just like the president from Tejas (Texas, in the american idiom) of forty years ago this one has lied us into a war.
Oh I know you don't think he lied, but the facts are that Iraq had just about ZILCH to do with 9-11, let alone the fact that it was hardly a threat to us. You really need to study the history of this nation a bit better, you might realize that while we often had "good intentions" we were blundering buffoons. Does not the Christian expression: "The road to hell is paved with good intentions" apply anymore?
Posted by: Bubba Bo Bob Brain at May 23, 2005 09:07 PM (aHbua)
6
I think if we all listened to the age old adage that it is best to not discuss politics or religion in public, we as a society would be better off.
That being said, it ain't easy to do these days. But, we still should try.
Posted by: Sean at May 23, 2005 09:15 PM (cl3Om)
7
Sean..I have never understood that adage, and still don't understand it. How on earth would you have a democracy without discussing religion in public? How can we possibly exist as a polity if we are each to live in our own hermetically-sealed cells without communication?
Posted by: David Foster at May 26, 2005 01:20 AM (+c+ME)
8
From today's Washington Post:
"Interrogators at the U.S. detention facility at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, forced a stubborn detainee to wear women's underwear on his head, confronted him with snarling military working dogs and attached a leash to his chains, according to a newly released military investigation that shows the tactics were employed there months before military police used them on detainees at the Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq."
Makes you wonder what parts of our society are most responsbile for the breakdown of civility. If I find this sort of behavior disgusting and counterproductive, does that mean that I "yearn for the death" of my society? No doubt someone will say terrorists don't deserve civilized treatment, and they may be right, but surely a civilized society wouldn't put anyone into that category without some due process.
Posted by: Pericles at July 14, 2005 03:25 PM (hHudX)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
May 20, 2005
TWIN TOWERS
My husband and I have said all along the same thing that
Donald Trump is saying: we want the WTC back. Not a garden of peaceful tranquility, not a beam of light, but the same symbol of capitalism and prosperity that the WTC was. I wish it could happen.
Posted by: Sarah at
04:57 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 53 words, total size 1 kb.
1
http://www.warrenfarr.com/rebuild
Now THERE'S a rebuilding plan!
Posted by: CavalierX at May 22, 2005 11:45 AM (Mu0KL)
2
While it's a nice idea, in theory, it is very impractical. There is a greater demand for residential real estate in NYC than there is for office space.
Any development of the site, if considered practically, would be of dual use.
Considering that 7 Word Trade (my old office) is nearing completion and has no tenants slated to move in, building yet another office building, or two, or two that happen to be 4 times the size, is a burden that NYC taxpayers need to consider.
I don't buy into that nonsense that building anything other than [insert building of choice] is "letting the terrorists win".
Pride is a deadly sin. It shouldn't motivate what we build in this city.
That said, I hate the "Freedom Tower". I say build a series of horribly practical, Roark-like structures that both honor the slain but meet the current market needs.
Posted by: Sean at May 23, 2005 09:21 PM (cl3Om)
3
Cavalier.
Wow. I actually love that design. Shoot.
However, building on what I noted earlier, something that size is impractical.
Additionally, insurance on buidlings that big would be simply impossible to get.
While I admire the sentiment of sending a big "F*** you" to al-Qaeda, insurance companies do not.
I would have to think long and hard about moving in to one of those buidings were one to be a residential complex, knowing the terrorists would probably make it their mission to knock them back down.
Posted by: Sean at May 23, 2005 09:27 PM (cl3Om)
4
Heh.. rebuild it as it was.. and Move the UN onto the top floors...
Posted by: LarryConley at May 24, 2005 02:37 PM (F7e7i)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
April 14, 2005
MISSED THE ANNIV
Ali says that
what he wrote isn't a poem, but I disagree. It's wonderful.
I re-read what I wrote after the first anniversary of the fall of Saddam's statue. Funnily enough, we have one of those posters in our house: I like to think of it as how far we've come.
Posted by: Sarah at
08:31 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 57 words, total size 1 kb.
February 20, 2005
SUPPORT
I had been emailing with a blog reader for a couple of months before she found out they would be stationed here on my post in Germany.
A Soldier and His Wife arrived this week, and we all went out to dinner last night.
We talked a bit about Anheuser-Busch and how supportive they've been of the troops. They made that Super Bowl commercial, they have offered free passes to Sea World and Busch Gardens, and they donate two free beers to every soldier returning from Iraq. They are the King of Beers. We talked about how there really are people in this world who love soldiers, who want to show their support, and who go the extra mile to show their gratitude to the men and women who protect us.
I thought of that coversation again as I read this story from Russ Vaughn. And I cried like a baby at the dedication this woman showed to thank a soldier.
Posted by: Sarah at
02:49 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 163 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I had stopped buying Anheuser-Busch products some years ago when they closed non-Busch Gardens access to their hospitality center and brewery tour in Williamsburg (going there was an annual ritual when visiting my mother in the adjecent Busch development). Their Super Bowl commercial has brought me back.
Posted by: Glenmore at February 20, 2005 09:47 AM (89SjL)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
February 19, 2005
WRONG
This wonderful article called
The Millionaire Next Door vs. the Politician in Washington hits on what I mentioned the other day.
The problem with college financial aid is that for two families with equal lifetime incomes, the one that consumes the most and saves the least gets the most financial aid.
This is the single greatest problem I noticed when I worked for the university and saw financial aid disbursement. The 25 year olds with three kids by three different fathers were the ones going to school for free. We're rewarding the wrong behavior.
Posted by: Sarah at
05:10 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 96 words, total size 1 kb.
1
And that's not the end of it. That which is subsidized always rises in price. The skyrocketing cost of a college education is directly traceable to governmental subsidy of that cost through financial aid programs.
Don't think about Medicare. Don't!
Posted by: Francis W. Porretto at February 19, 2005 07:12 AM (MzH7h)
2
"Displaced homemaker" is the politically correct term.
Posted by: Bunker at February 19, 2005 11:29 AM (FP9A9)
3
Kling (the author) frequently says "if you want more of something, subsidize it; if you want less, tax it". So simple, it should be the first thing out of any Senator's mouth when they debate spending bills. And this article shows it's not just limited to government.
I should know: I applied for college in 1998, and out of something like 2500 scholarships, as a white male with middle-class parents who had saved money for my tuition, I was eligible for exactly 6. 6 out of 2500, the rest for minorities and the "poor" (those who hadn't saved enough). Sad.
Posted by: James at February 20, 2005 02:18 PM (b/Wuv)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
February 17, 2005
NEVER
I started this blog as a way to try to understand the world we live in. Some days I do just fine. Other days I can't believe the monsters who breathe the same air as I do.
It started last night with this opinion column on the ROTC ban at Columbia:
Joining the military is flushing your education down the toilet. Why would people come here if they were just going to enter the military upon graduation in the first place? It’s like, “Well, I just spent four years learning about mankind’s accomplishments, but all I really want to do is kill people.” I’m not really sure how the Core curriculum is going to come in handy when you’ve been ordered to stack a group of naked Iraqi prisoners in a human pyramid.
I, and I suspect most students on this campus, embrace the “civil-military” gap that ROTC bemoans. The fact is, I cannot comprehend why anyone would want to be in the military at this juncture in American history. Meanwhile, our campus is one of the few remaining places where as students, we can be free from the ever-increasing “let’s roll” mentality that is becoming so dominant in this nation.
Wow. I am shocked someone would say something so nasty. But we're talkin' college kids here, so I'm not that surprised. What did in fact surprise me -- shock the bejesus out of me, to be frank -- was this email Greyhawk got, shocking because it's from a Department of Defense high school teacher:
I hope that your children's teachers offer you children the type of education where they see what a close-minded, blood-thirsty individual you are. You are the type of person who will fight for freedom, all right, as long as it is for the freedom of white, American males. Hitler loved people like you. Of course, like you, I am strictly judging you by your comments, not by actually knowing anything about you or your motivations. And, of course, like you, I am taking everything you say out of context without knowing anything about you. The difference is is that I am actually literate. In fact, aside from judging you to be a bigot, a sexist, and someone who probably didn't do very well in school at all, I would further judge you to be someone who has a hard time passing a pt test. Why don't you "ping the wife" about this one? She is probably happiest when you are not pinging her at all.
A teacher employed by the US Army wrote that letter to Greyhawk. I will never, never grok this world we live in.
MORE:
Neal Boortz
Paulie
Posted by: Sarah at
04:50 AM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
Post contains 448 words, total size 3 kb.
1
Some people feel so wise when they say, once the last soldier drops his gun, or if countries didn't have militaries, there would be no wars. It's like saying we could get rid of our crime problems, if there were no police. It's such reverse thinking, but it makes sense in their minds. I am also disgusted with many things that happened in Iraq at the hands of US soldiers, but to judge the whole military is outrageous. For a country who prides individuality, it's irrational to make such sweeping statements. But don't despair, Sarah, these aren't new sentiments. You as an Ayn Rand fan know that 'looters' in some form have been around forever.
Posted by: calivalleygirl at February 17, 2005 06:50 AM (kcSB8)
2
Well, the writer in question appears to come from an environment where veterans or those who know veterans firsthand are few and far between.
Unfortunately that's the case at my alma mater too. I can't think of a single veteran on the faculty or staff. There may or may not be some in the student body. When I was there, there was a four year Army man and a currently serving Marine reservist. That's two out of over 1300. Not a very good ratio.
Check out Neal Boortz today for something similar.
http://boortz.com/nuze/index.html
Posted by: James Sloan at February 17, 2005 11:53 AM (69DlR)
3
My son and your husband are proud to have served their country and defended the people that they love and care for. It's just too bad that people like the one who wrote the letter to grayhawk and the students who are against the ROTC being on campus are going to benifit from their service.
It is amazing to me how many people really don't understand that it is the US Armed Forces that keep us living in the land of the free and the home of the Brave.. Thank God for the Men & Women who fight for Freedom & Liberty for all who are oppressed. May God Bless them..
Posted by: 1Ad Proud ArmyMom at February 17, 2005 12:29 PM (lZ8lX)
4
hey ms.grok clowns like that teacher are a minorty in this country.as a veteran of the first persian gluf war (I was a sailor)and a member of a liberal blue state(queens,new york city)even people against the current OIF strongly back the men and women serving bravely in uniform every day.trust me. have fun when the hasband gets home.all the best tommy
Posted by: anon at February 17, 2005 01:40 PM (NMK3S)
5
My old high school got rid of it's JROTC program, though for vastly different reasons. It was founded by a princess and for Hawaiians (and part hawaiians) only and someone sued, so they gave it up since it was a federal program.
The loss was just as great and Leadership Development is no longer taught there outside of sports, which is not nearly as good at teaching responsibility and real leadership. A sad day for a school that put out so many who served (and still serve) their country.
Kalroy
Posted by: Kalroy at February 17, 2005 05:45 PM (i9w6W)
6
If you're going to start posting "tissue warnings" for moving/sad stories, you need "puke-bucket warnings" for shit like this that makes me want to vomit:
By accepting ROTC on campus, Columbia would be encouraging some of its students not to be great thinkers but to be warriors whose purpose is to kill. Supporters of the ROTC will attempt to make distinctions like, “you can train to be a doctor in the military,” or whatever, but the point is, anyone in uniform is just as guilty of enforcing the will of the United States via the use of force as the soldier who actually pulls the trigger.
...because if we could just get rid of that pesky US military, the whole world would be a happy, friendly place full of pretty flowers and cuddly puppies and smiling faces and tie-die ponchos. News flash: when the pot wears off, the world stops looking so rosy, hippy.
This is such a typical liberal position. They worry that having ROTC on campus will draw in people too stupid to think for themselves (yet, apparently, smart enough to get into Columbia). So, rather than let them have free will, the stupid must be protected from themselves. It is outside the realm of possibility (in the liberal mind) that somebody would actually think things through and come to the decision to join the military. Hateful God-damned hippies.
I think we all know the *real* reason they can't have a ROTC program is that the cadets would use the School of Journalism for demo practice. "Oops, training accident, no more Dan Rathers." Heheheh... we can dream, right?
Posted by: James at February 17, 2005 08:02 PM (QvU5o)
7
Hi all (and a special Hi to Sarah),
I'm a spokesman for Advocates for Columbia ROTC.
If you have questions about our efforts to restore ROTC at Columbia, feel free to drop me a line at elc2003@columbia.edu.
Eric
Posted by: Eric at February 17, 2005 08:10 PM (tGPm6)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
February 16, 2005
HEH
Perspective: I may be feeling blue, but at least I'm not the soldiers who are face down in 6 inches of snow at the firing range today.
Realization: And it's hard to stay blue when you've got Taco Bell in your tummy and "MMMBop" is on the radio.
Posted by: Sarah at
09:00 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 50 words, total size 1 kb.
February 04, 2005
GENEROSITY
I heard a touching story from my favorite reservist, a blog reader I've followed for his whole tour in Iraq. A husband and wife couple ran the alterations shop on his camp in Baghdad, and a few months ago the husband was killed by insurgents. No one knew what had happened to the wife until the other day when she reopened the alterations shop. My reservist says:
When we walked into the shop, it was packed with soldiers and the shelves were rapidly becoming bare. The wife was dressed completely in black but still had a smile on her face as she greeted us. I literally could find nothing to buy and she refused to accept money for nothing. Even her entire stock of fake Rolex watches were gone. One soldier even bought a bootleg Barbara Steisand movie just to give her business and money. No one laughed and one soldier thanked him for helping out as he walked out.
The generosity of the American (soldier) is beyond belief at times. I hope she restocks and stays open.
Something about that story just touches my heart.
Posted by: Sarah at
03:40 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 188 words, total size 1 kb.
1
She reminds me of the folk I knew back home in North Minnesota. They would not take charity, but prefered to live by the sweat of their brow. The Iraqi people, for the most part, are just like many of us. We want what we work for and not a penny more.
Posted by: mdmhvonpa at February 04, 2005 10:33 AM (/D3gv)
2
Probably the nicest soldiers ever marched. Sure, you do get some rough characters, but never the type of wholesale nastiness that became a calling card for their actions, i.e."..reminiscent of Genghis Khan..." Kids runnign after GI vehicle gets candy and leftover MRE items, not raked by gunfire. American GI's go out of their ways to do nice things during wars. Not many wartime soldiers do nice things for the population at large by their own initiative. Just contrast that with the behavior of some other armed forces during, and since, WWII. You'll find GI's on the "nice" side of the list more often than not. Yes, I was on the receiving of that kindness. Thanks, GI, you numbah one!
P.S. As a descendant of the Mongol Horde, it's "Jenjis" Khan if you're a pretentious East Coast pseudo-intellectual leftist weenie.
Posted by: icepick at February 04, 2005 02:31 PM (Zxd2F)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 31, 2005
YAY
Greyhawk has my favorite
round-up of Iraqi voting photos. Many have quoted Iraqi blogs, but
Varifrank takes my cake for favorite non-Iraqi commentary.
Posted by: Sarah at
03:37 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 25 words, total size 1 kb.
January 30, 2005
BRAVE SOULS
Naturally I'm a little concerned about my husband today. But at the front of my mind are the
Iraqi election workers:
The Iraqis know that not everyone in the room will survive the elections. “Maybe not tomorrow. Maybe not next week,” one poll worker says. But maybe a month from now, insurgents will kill him.
Posted by: Sarah at
05:52 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 59 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Please contact me. Greyhawk suggests you might have a way of reaching someone in country for a story I'm working on in WIRED magazine. Blackfive also suggested I try and reach this person in Iraq. I would be happy to tell you more if you contact me. I love "Grok"
Posted by: john hockenberry at January 30, 2005 07:40 AM (sjEDM)
2
John, I can't access my email today, but if you send me an email to tryingtogrok [at] hotmail [dot] com and give me the details, I will reply as soon as I can.
Posted by: Sarah at January 30, 2005 08:58 AM (Ymuf2)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
GOOD START
The polls in Iraq have been open for two hours. So far so good.
Posted by: Sarah at
01:56 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 18 words, total size 1 kb.
January 29, 2005
VOTING
First Afghanistan voted.

Now Iraq votes.

Exile Mehsin Imgoter breaks down as he casts his absentee vote. Does voting mean this much to you? Michael Moore had to promise free underpants to folks just to get them to come to the polling place; one Iraqi in Canada drove 14 hours to cast his vote. Does voting make you cry? Would you risk your life to vote? Can we even begin to understand what Mehsin Imgoter is feeling?
Greyhawk's daughter wrote a guest post at Mudville Gazette; this part especially made me smile:
I think itÂ’s wonderful that these people are finally getting the rights they deserve. I also learned in my history class that it took 150 years before women could vote in America. This opportunity is available to the women of Iraq today, that puts them one step ahead of America's first elections already. Who knows if this election will be a perfect election? WhatÂ’s stopping a terrorist from shooting one of the candidates or voters? But, we must not give up.
We're not giving up. The military has set out a clear list of do's and don't's for coalition troops, and they're doing their best to prevent attacks on polling stations. My own husband has been working around the clock to make tomorrow happen, and I can't wait to talk to him after it's all said and done. Until then I stand and wait.
I stand and wait for Iraq to begin a brave new era in history, and though it won't be perfect overnight, it's a start. It's the start of peace, because there can't be peace until men are truly free.
Tomorrow is one of the most exciting days in Iraqi history. Let freedom reign.
Posted by: Sarah at
05:49 AM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
Post contains 291 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Sarah - thanks to you and your husband tomorrow is indeed a historic day in Iraq. I hope the people can vote in secuirty and our soldiers are also safe. Thanks for sacrificing time with your husband to promote freedom in Iraq.
Posted by: Kathleen A at January 29, 2005 09:09 AM (vnAYT)
2
Father in Heaven, I ask your protection around Sarahs husband and herself as she stands and waits with him. I pray Lord that with your mighty hand and outstretched arm you will do a miracle. Foil the plans of the enemy, place a hedge of protection around the coalition troops and the Iraqi heading out to vote. I will NOT surrender Iraq to the enemy of this world, but claim it and all who dwell in it , for you. Amen.
Posted by: debbie at January 29, 2005 10:21 AM (KzU+f)
3
"Let freedom reign."
Gaaahh.
It's "Let Freedom Ring," folks. Bush prominently screwed it up, repeating it is like repeating "misunderestimating." It might be funny, but it is funny because it's dumb.
Posted by: quibbler at January 29, 2005 06:23 PM (uyB39)
4
Let freedom reign!
i think it's so cool that your husband is participating in history!
Posted by: annika at January 30, 2005 03:27 PM (15C4H)
5
Quibbler, though that was also MY first thought when I heard it, he DIDN'T screw it up.
I remember reading an article explaining it. It's a lesser-known phrase. If I recall correctly, it was particularly associated with the end of apartheid in South Africa and Bush had been recently reading a book about the end of apartheid. Try googling the phrase to find out more.
Posted by: Beth at January 30, 2005 05:02 PM (19It1)
6
http://money.caclbca.org/rmarys/ baseinchesmelted
Posted by: him at August 31, 2005 10:09 AM (DcMsf)
Posted by: Spammed are you at September 22, 2005 07:23 PM (tGyZj)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 28, 2005
CITIZEN
The United States gained another citizen yesterday; unfortunately he was unable to celebrate.
My heart celebrates for him.
Posthumous citizenship granted to Marine
Posted by: Sarah at
04:37 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 25 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Your celebrating cause a guy is dead. How sick is that?
Which one do you think his family would rather give up? His life or his citizenship?
Posted by: good to go at January 28, 2005 01:33 PM (ywZa8)
2
Dear Good to Go,
I truly wish you would stop writing such negative, nasty things. You must be a terribly miserable, unhappy person. You are so full of meanness. I would suggest that you start your own blog; it seems you have so much hatred inside of you that I think the writing might be theraputic for you. In the meantime, I'm tired of reading your comments on this blog site. This sight is uplifting and optimistic, that is, until you comment.
Posted by: Nancy at January 28, 2005 11:06 PM (YuW6k)
3
Hi Nancy,
What is uplifting about a dead soldier getting awarded citizenship? They get twelve thousand dollars given to their families as well. Do we celebrate that too?
If you want to hide your head in the sand and pretend their deaths for beloved leaders lies is what patriotism is all about then I feel sorry for you.
Posted by: good to go at January 29, 2005 12:35 PM (ywZa8)
4
good to go :
I'd give his family more than that - there's a movement to pass legislation for raising that amount. The dollars aren't the important thing, but they will help the family to survive their loss.
The citizenship was deserved because he was willing to go wherever the military sent him, and die for his adopted country. America is not about where you were born, it is about ideas, like Freedom, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness - remember that phrase? You may have been born here (most likely), but you have apparently forgotten some key essentials.
Posted by: Barb at January 31, 2005 01:46 AM (g9qHI)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
100kb generated in CPU 0.1335, elapsed 0.2112 seconds.
58 queries taking 0.1657 seconds, 253 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.