1 The idea that government spending creates jobs makes sense only if you never ask where the government got the money.

We educators make sure that no one ever asks such questions. Question authority only when Republicans are in power!

It didn’t fall from the sky.

Of course not. The money comes from eeeevil rich people who won't share their wealth with you! Demand your fair share! Vote Democrat! (At least until Communists are on the ballot. Who keeps them off? McCarthyism lives - even in modern Omerica!)

The only way Congress can inject spending into the economy is by first taxing or borrowing it out of the economy.

But at least Congress is doing something, unlike the Republicans who can only say no, or the lazy libertarians who believe the economy runs itself - hah!

However, the private sector now has $300 billion less to spend

Good. The more money in government hands, the better. The government has collective wisdom lacking in unwise greedy individuals.

The stimulus has not created new jobs. It has merely moved them to a new town.

A more deserving town. Redistribution is righteous.

2

Well, as a business owner I agree completely that the accounting doesn't add up.  BUT!  It does have an affect on public opinion and empty statements like "we've created jobs" actually do help to improve people's spending habits.  

I've seen it first hand.  The whole thing doesn't make a lick of sense on a rational level, but it seems to be serving an emotional need.  I'm not educated enough on economics to understand what that emotional satisfaction is "worth" but it seems to be working from my (admittedly low-level) experience.

3 They could have just passed The Elevator Safety and Economic Opportunity Act of 2009.

4 The "jobs" being created are government jobs...expanding the empire. I just laugh when I hear the President or Biden or whomever bragging about job creation...it reminds me of what Romney said in one of his campaign stop talks...something about if the best hope for the future of job creation is in the government sector and not private enterprise, we're all in trouble...I agree!

1 "I always wondered why society would want only the "stupider" sort of women to raise the next generation."

I love this. I'm a stay at home, homeschooling mom to three (soon to be four) boys. I also graduated magna cum laude with degrees in honors and psychology. All the time I hear comments about "wasting my degree ... blah, blah, blah".  I think these people are absolutely nutty! Really? They'd rather my children be in a factory type daycare setting? Their minds, values, and personalities being formed by someone who barely graduated highschool and is making $7.00 an hour?

Two speeches I think you'd like:
http://www.nationalcenter.org/TRooseveltMotherhood.html
I love this whole speech!


http://www.cse.dmu.ac.uk/~mward/gkc/books/Social_Reform_B.C.html
Written in 1927, this part at the end has shown to be eerily prophetic:

The advocates of Birth Control are in revolt against the conditions of human life ....  They seem to express a sympathy with those who prefer "the right to earn outside the home" or (in other words) the right to be a wage-slave and work under the orders of a total stranger because he happens to be a richer man. By what conceivable contortions of twisted thought this ever came to be considered a freer condition than that of companionship with the man she has herself freely accepted, I never could for the life of me make out. The only sense I can make of it is that the proletarian work, though obviously more senile and subordinate than the parental, is so far safer and more irresponsible because it is not parental. I can easily believe that there are some people who do prefer working in a factory to working in a family; for there are always some people who prefer slavery to freedom, and who especially prefer being governed to governing someone else. But I think their quarrel with motherhood is not like mine, a quarrel with inhuman conditions, but simply a quarrel with life. Given an attempt to escape from the nature of things, and I can well believe that it might lead at last to something like "the nursery school for our children staffed by other mothers and single women of expert training." I will add nothing to that ghastly picture, beyond speculating pleasantly about the world in which women cannot manage their own children but can manage each other's.

2 Ching and I were talking about "life" the other night at 3 a.m. and I said I felt like I hadn't accomplished a damn thing in the past ten years.  Then I thought to myself - well, other than be a good wife.  And she said, well, you've taken good care of me.  And with the army and the moves and civilian jobs...  it hasn't been easy.  And now - with Pinhead on the way, I finally get to do the one job I've been waiting over eight years to do - be a mom.  I can't wait.

3

A friend had a conversation just the other night with a man whose son cries after school each day. He raises his hand in class, you see. He knows the answer. "Does anyone OTHER than Billy know the answer?" the teacher asks with disdain. Or parks him in an empty classroom so his intellect won't insult the others, one assumes.

Their eyes are open, now, to the other options. You can stay home, you can raise your own child and, yes, teach it. Vacation when it works for your schedules, teach through experience, and love them all day long, every day.

Anything else seems like a very poor trade-off to me.

4 My mother had seven children. At several times in her life she was asked by other, very rude, women why she had so many.  Her answer was always this, "the world needs the type people my children are."  In her later life she referred to this often and would then add to us, "what would I do now without my children?"
Yes, we are all intelligent people who are not afraid to speak out, and have raised children who are intelligent and not afraid to speak out. We are also compassionate and caring. Our mama taught us well.

5 Great post, Sarah. I agree with Ruth. I think the most important job we can have is to raise intelligent, responsible and caring children. I don't believe in leaving their development up to the random caregivers we would encounter through our frequent moves and situation changes. This truly is the greatest job we will undertake and I am so grateful I have the opportunity to stay home with my kids. I know you will make a great mom! So excited for you!

6

I <3 Abigail Adams and *I* needed this perspective today.  It is so easy to feel like I am accomplishing little.  I need to be reminded how important my job, and the gifts that I bring to my job as a mother really are. 

7 Thank you so much for posting this. On particularly tough days, I begin to question why I stay home with my children, why I homeschool, and why I'm doing everything contrary to the way everyone else seems to be doing things. It's nice to read a little affirmation from time to time.

8

I find value in all of your posts, but this one in particular spoke to me. As many others have commented, it is becoming increasingly more difficult to stay at home with children without having to justify why you do so. It always amazes me when people wonder how I could have walked away from my career, or how I could stay home all day with two small children. How crazy is that??? I did intentionally have them, you know! And now, they wonder why we are choosing to send our oldest to a university model, classical school for kinder in the fall (part-time private, part-time homeschool education). Why is it so difficult for people, especially other women, to understand why we are investing so much time, love and care in our children?

And btw, I'm a good friend of Heidi's and a faithful reader/lurker. You inspire me and I'm so thrilled for the next chapter of your journey to begin. Praying your husband is home soon and for the safe arrival of your sweet baby.

9 I completely agree with your post, parenting is such an important job... and I think that part of the fall out of feminism was the total rejection of things previously in the stereotypical women's sphere. But, I also don't agree with some of the tone of the comments prior to mine. And perhaps I'm just sensitive. I chose to return to school part time when my daughter was 3, and prior to that I was a stay at home mom. It was a very tough decision to make, I loved being at home with her, but I felt that it was the right decision for me and my family. There is something to be said for pursuing a dream outside of motherhood, and I don't like the all or nothing approach that seems to reign whenever this topic comes up. Either you are painted as a terrible mother who couldn't or wouldn't stay at home, or conversely you are seen as an unintelligent, unmotivated person without a career for investing instead in your children. It's no win. There, now I feel better having written it. I'm so excited for you to start the journey of motherhood, Sarah. You're going to love it

10

Thank you, Thank you, THANK YOU.

This post, and the links, and the comments, make my heart so happy!!!  Motherhood really is the most critical occupation on the planet, and the *most worthy* of our investments of time and talents.

Dutchgirl, I didn't pick up an "all-or-nothing" vibe from these comments; we know what works for *our own families*, and I don't think your getting more education means that motherhood isn't your top priority.  FWIW, I'd like to become an ND; someday (probably at least a decade out or so, LOL...) I'll have time & money to do that while Kiddo is working on his reading or a research paper, since I'm teaching him at home, too - we can work on our HW together!