May 31, 2007


CaliValleyGirl said she often wants to run off and start her own country. Here's another reason to join her:

Presidential hopeful Hillary Rodham Clinton outlined a broad economic vision Tuesday, saying it's time to replace an "on your own" society with one based on shared responsibility and prosperity.

The Democratic senator said what the Bush administration touts as an ownership society really is an "on your own" society that has widened the gap between rich and poor.

"I prefer a 'we're all in it together' society," she said. "I believe our government can once again work for all Americans. It can promote the great American tradition of opportunity for all and special privileges for none."

That means pairing growth with fairness, she said, to ensure that the middle-class succeeds in the global economy, not just corporate CEOs.

"There is no greater force for economic growth than free markets. But markets work best with rules that promote our values, protect our workers and give all people a chance to succeed," she said. "Fairness doesn't just happen. It requires the right government policies.

Great googily moogily. That's an extremely scary worldview.

Of course "fairness doesn't just happen," because what people like Clinton want is fairness of result. And that requires that the government rig the system so that overachievers can't get rich and dumb people don't get poor. What's "fair" about the United States is that anyone who works hard can get rich, or at least move up the economic scale. Just ask the Combodian donut makers, who own upwards of 90% of donut shops in California. They came to this country, invested in a business where they could be successful, and work their tails off:

“It’s not easy work at all. As a family we are working seven days a week, the store is open 24 hours, and we have no family time. It’s tiring,” said a 26-year-old Chinese American who requested anonymity.

No one offered to make things more fair for these people. They came to the US and worked, instead of expecting the government to help them live. And they did it "on their own." I know several people from countries like Poland and Bulgaria who came to the US with the money in their pockets and worked like the dickens to earn every cent they have. If they can do it, anyone can. On their own.

They tried the "'we're all in it together' society" before; it was called the U.S.S.R. And it failed miserably because not everyone wants to work as hard as a Cambodian donut cutter. Is Hilary Clinton really silly-brained enough to think that this is the direction the US should take?

Hey, Cali, if we start this new country, I want the Cambodians to come with us.
Donuts rule.

Posted by: Sarah at 12:56 PM | Comments (4) | Add Comment
Post contains 477 words, total size 3 kb.

1 I never understood those weirdo cults before. Like the Branch Davidians in Waco, TX. However, although I don't agree with them I can understand the desire to just branch off, because you want to get off the wildly out of control train before it derails.

Posted by: CaliValleyGirl at May 31, 2007 02:04 PM (deur4)

2 Great oogily moogily. Still giggling. Thanks for that.

Posted by: Oda Mae at May 31, 2007 08:54 PM (wK887)

3 As long as there's someone who can cook good Mexican food, I'd like to apply for citizenship in that country, too. Can I be Secretary of State? In college I was voted "Most Likely to Cause an International Incident", and it might be a way for me to fulfill that.

Posted by: airforcewife at June 01, 2007 03:03 AM (0dU3f)

4 Instead of "running away" how about making sure this socialist pig doesn't get elected.

Posted by: tim at June 01, 2007 03:40 AM (nno0f)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
44kb generated in CPU 0.02, elapsed 0.127 seconds.
48 queries taking 0.1103 seconds, 171 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.