November 19, 2004
FASTING
Apparently a little boy in Iran was
killed for breaking his Ramadan fast. When Ramadan started in Iraq, US soldiers were given strict rules: no eating, drinking, or smoking in front of Iraqis during Ramadan. However, my husband says that none of the Iraqis he works with were observing the fast. The American Arabic translators scolded the Iraqis for chowing down in the middle of the day, but the Iraqis just shrugged their shoulders. Now that there's freedom to choose -- a freedom that doesn't exist in Iran -- the Iraqi people are free to decide if they want to fast. Saddam's not watching any longer.
Posted by: Sarah at
02:16 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 108 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Agreed, killing a boy for not fasting is heinous.
That said, I find it sad that Iraqis are not fasting when their religion suggests. I doubt all of these "fast-less" Iraqis encountered are truly renouncing their religion at the first opportunity. Indeed, some of these people have a low feeling in their stomach when they chow down at high noon.
Imagine the dill-weed at the major league baseball game wearing the (intentionally) dirty hat. The "Star-Spangled Banner" begins to play: he knows he is supposed to remove his hat. The WWII veteran in the row behind him nearly-instinctually removes his pristine cap, with a noticeably shallower bill-angle than the nearly circular one fashioned by dill-weed. Mid-verse, Vet nudges dill-weed and reminds him to remove his cap. Dill-weed hadn't forgotten or renounced his country. He just thought it would roughen his incredibly smooth style if he had to remove that smelly hat that defines him.
Now imagine President Bush's Inauguration. The Reverend begins his prayer, one which may have no meaning to half the people in attendance. For the other half, the prayer, if internalized earnestly, surely is one of the few appropriate simultaneous religious-patriotic moments. Imagine dill-weed, now grown up and in attendance at the Inauguration. Wouldn't it be nice if he'd shut up and stop talking with his peer standing next to him during this moment.
In times of incredible tension, there is no substitute for religion. Even if religion turns out to be hogwash, there is unmatched comfort which it can bring during crisis. Here's an appropriate religious
moment of agents of a goverment (wish I could have found the photo I saw last week of US Marines doing the same thing). For most other tempting religious-political scenarios, maybe we should see
here.
Customs, even if they look silly to an outsider, define a culture. I think that the strict rules given to the American soldiers are not inappropriate, but quite compassionate.
Posted by: Curtis Moe at November 19, 2004 11:33 AM (0EoK7)
2
please mr. moe, this is not the forum for a lecture. notice the gut-wrenching details of the 14 year old boy's story. he was tied to a poll and beaten to death. not by an enemy force, or terrorists. this boy was beaten 85 times by men he probably knew. the mullah who reigned over his community. he broke a fasting rule - was it out of disrespect? was it a lack of reverence? does it matter in the least? he was beaten 85 times by the 'pillars' of his community, probably trusted, pious men. how quickly can you move on, mr. moe. please have some reverence for this poor boys death. is 'religion' and 'tradition' more important than the wellbeing of God's people? [whomever your God is]. i pray for the soul of that young boy. and i pray for his family, and i'll take a moment to mourn his horrible end. and i'll pray that no other child will have to endure such treatment.
Posted by: jonkendall at November 19, 2004 06:38 PM (vPPSo)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
November 16, 2004
DEPRESSION? REALLY...
Dear therapy-seekers in Florida,
I understand that some of you are upset that Kerry lost the election. I would've been pretty upset if President Bush had lost as well. I would've been down in the dumps. I would've been concerned for our nation's future. I would've wanted to gripe about it to my friends. I might've cried for a brief moment. I understand it's a big deal. But now we have a group of you seeking therapy for your depression, which they've given the catchy name of Post Election Selection Trauma.
You want to know what depression is? Spend the weekend mourning your friend's husband. Sit on her sofa trying to chitchat and ignore the lump that's rising in your throat. Watch her child playing with car keys, oblivious to the sorrow in the room. Take time off of work to go to a memorial service for four brave men who were killed over the weekend. And then come talk to me about depression.
One of my students wrote something this week about America being the "land of the too-free", that people in the US have it so good that they don't even know what real problems and suffering look like. He's dead on. I'd like some of you Post Election Selection Trauma patients to spend a day in Mrs. Sims' shoes and then tell me what real depression feels like.
Grow up, people.
P.S. And while we're on the topic of "things that burn me up", I hope I never meet the disrespectful and disgusting SSG Fitts. CPT Sims' wife read that article, you bastard.
Posted by: Sarah at
03:08 PM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
Post contains 270 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Apparently others felt the same about the article...the link is now gone.
Posted by: Mike at November 16, 2004 04:37 PM (MqNKC)
2
Here's another link. Same article made the Washington Times.
http://washingtontimes.com/world/20041115-124042-4702r.htm
Posted by: Oda Mae at November 16, 2004 05:07 PM (x5UFE)
3
Sarah - Don't jump on SSG Fitts, he did not write the article. He was just a good NCO taking advantage of an error in judgement by another to warm his soldiers not to make the same mistake - his actions could well have saved the life of one or more of his troopers. Direct your feelings toward the reporter who wrote the first article. Any good NCO worth his salt and concerned about the welfare of his soldiers or mariners should have done the same thing as SSG Fitts. enough said !!
Posted by: bob at November 16, 2004 08:19 PM (e48LF)
4
Sarah,
Bob is right. You can't fault SSG Fitts for being a good NCO and instructing his troops to not make the same mistakes as others. I also fail to see the disrespect - respecting your officers, living or dead, does not mean ignoring their mistakes, which are bound to happen in war.
We can only remember fondly our dead comrades, and make sure we don't lose any more friends the same way.
LT S
Posted by: S at November 16, 2004 08:44 PM (swRUK)
5
I am not in the military, but I took sergent Fitts' remarks in the same way. He was trying to shock his men into being more careful, not gloating over the death of your friend.
When I was in charge of large groups of employees years ago, I occasionally said similiar things to get their attention. Today I am a lawyer, and while I no longer manage many employees, I sometimes use similar tactics when counseling my clients. Even experienced business exectives sometimes don't appreciate the danger of litigation. They begin thinking of it as a bunch of paperwork and meetings, and don't realize that there may be very serious consequence. When I see this happening, I lay out the potential consequences -- jail time, bankruptcy, etc. -- in graphic detail in order to shock them into cooperation. Nothing gets someone's attention like the word "jail," and it looks like the sergent was using "death" in a smiliar manner in a setting with even higher stakes. It seems like he had good intentions.
Posted by: Joe Schmoe at November 16, 2004 10:47 PM (lMk5r)
6
First of all, it is not always a mistake that gets you killed in war. Sometimes it's just bad luck. Another soldier was killed when an RPG was fired in his vehicle. The soldier in the vehicle next to him did not. Is that second soldier smarter? Better? No, just a luckier SOB.
People who know Sean know he was one of the best commanders on post. Even other commanders spoke of him with respect and admiration. He would not have casually strolled in the building with a "gaggle" of soldiers, like he was taking a tour. Google his name and read other articles quoting him. This man was OUTSTANDING.
How much harder would it have been for the SSG to say "Stay sharp! There are still hostiles out there, they even got the CO! We're not done fighting yet!"
What he said was WRONG. And it caused unnecessary pain to his wife. The guy's a putz. Wanker.
Sean was UNLUCKY. I hate to tell SSG Fitts this, but I don't think every casualty in Iraq was caused by the soldier's mistake, although thinking that clearly brings him comfort. (Step on a crack, break your mother's back, if I do everything JUST RIGHT, the bullets will fly right past me.)
I just hope the guy redeems himself by writing a letter to the editor explaining himself. And, heads up, imbedded reporter. CPT Sims was the hardened fighter, not the SSG.
Posted by: Oda Mae at November 17, 2004 02:25 AM (U42UN)
7
This is just to clarify that this SSG that everyone keeps coming down on was misquoted! His comment was not at all in reference to Cpt Sims not doing his job. His job as a NCO is to train his soldiers and keep them safe. He did that. Everyone reads this misquote thinking he is some kind of jerk that is putting down a fellow soldier when that was not at all the case. No one seems to point out that this is a soldier who after being shot 3 times in April returned in August to be back with these guys. A man who felt the need to protect his guys and be with them every step of the way. He has now just become the man that everyone loves to hate. I think it is time to remember that not everything you read is fact.
Posted by: J at December 01, 2004 06:20 PM (TUisz)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
November 14, 2004
ARAFAT
I mentioned I'd like to write something about Arafat, and the wife has been bugging me to keep my word. I don't think I could add very much new information on how vile the man is, but I thought I would offer a few observations. I'm only 24 years old. I paid pretty close attention to the news growing up. We weren't an overly political household but we stayed well informed. My only memories of Arafat and the PLO are the historic and now failed peace agreements done during the Clinton Administration. People my age have no political memory of Yasser Arafat or the PLO pre 1993. For me and all the other twenty-somethings who wave Palestinian flags and rant about the Likudniks who are responsible for the squalor the Palestinians live in, Yasser Arafat has only been a political leader. Sure, since 2000, he might be complicit in terror attacks. He could have done more to stop the EU aid-receiving Hizbollah jihadists, but with Bush and his proxy Sharon tearing everything up, can you blame those poor Palestinians? After all he is an elected leader. More elected than Bushitler no doubt, we 1980s born know-it-alls quip.
What most young people don't remember is that before 1993, Arafat was synonymous with terrorism. The PLO was a guerilla organization very much like Al Qaeda. Here are just a few highlights of President and Nobel Laureate Arafat and his PLO merry pranksters in the '70s and '80s.
8,000 individual acts of terrorism between 1969-1985 alone.
The massacre of 11 Israeli athletes at the 1972 Olympics.
The attack on the Maalot grade school that killed 21 children.
The hijacking of four airplanes in the 1970Â’s and an Italian Cruise Ship in 1985.
The man who had been exiled from both Egypt and Jordan was invited to Oslo in 1993 from his exile in Tunis, to sit down with Jimmy Carter and Bill Clinton. Here, the Osama Bin Laden of the '70s and '80s was given his own autonomous region to govern and a workable roadmap to getting a completely independent nation. I could go on about the numerous failed opportunities in the '90s, but they are so numerous I won't even name them. It is an almost undisputable fact that Arafat was offered 97% of the West Bank and all of the Gaza strip and on behalf of the Palestinian people replied, "NO. All or nothing."
I think we all know how that turned out. And what has Arafat, as the leader of the autonomous Palestinian territory, managed to amass besides failed opportunities in his ten years at the helm? Oh, about $7 billion! Estimates vary from $300 million to $7 billion, but he's no doubt worth a fortune. Since the 1970s, the PLO has been receiving hundreds of millions of dollars from Arab states and many other western nations. I don't know the exact numbers but it would make a nice shame graph for an ambitious blogger.
This man, who used the plight of the Palestinian people in Refugee camps as political capital, has wealth measured in billions. And yet, he was lauded by Western diplomats and journalists. An anchorwoman for the BBC reported his death with tears in her eyes. Nearly every Foreign Minister in Europe attended his funeral.
Yes, I'm well aware of his George Washington status with the Palestinians. He was powerful human symbol and forceful advocate; Palestinians united behind him in their pursuit of a homeland--or so says Jimmy Carter. I can think of another powerful advocate who rallied a humiliated people to a great pursuit. He felt the same way about Jews as Arafat.
Are we so afraid to call it like it is? Will Osama Bin Laden someday sit down with an American president to negotiate the withdrawal of troops from Saudi Arabia? Arafat has proven that you can move from terrorist to statesmen. He was able to do so because we allowed it. "Give peace a chance" is a really comfortable slogan. When facing a monster, it can me more comfortable to listen to him than to fight him.
I would just as soon homosexuals have every right that I do. I don't really care about abortion. I'm not crazy about the Patriot Act but I'm a one issue voter. And President Bush and I agree on one thing: this, while certainly tragic, is preferable to this.
-- the husband
MORE TO GROK:
Update from Sarah: If you seek his monument, look around you.
Posted by: Sarah at
12:40 PM
| Comments (9)
| Add Comment
Post contains 751 words, total size 5 kb.
1
Arafat despite his protestations to the otherwise never really wanted an autonomouos state. Hard to blame the west and the Israeli's for your inability to build an infrastructure. I am not afraid to call it as I see it. As I pointed out in the comments to another post, terrorism is not truely defeatable. At least until we're willing to address
the "draining of the swamp of poverty and social injustice where the mosquitoes that are terrorists breed". (Quote by of all people Pat Robertson). Until that day however; you at best contain and, limit it.
Posted by: Bubba Bo Bob Brain at November 14, 2004 01:15 PM (aHbua)
2
Husband: I salute your service---be safe---Sarah is doing a great job with words what you are doing with bullets.
Posted by: david at November 14, 2004 01:22 PM (ZVhuO)
3
Godspeed to you, Sarah's husband.
Posted by: annika at November 14, 2004 02:15 PM (vfqlz)
4
May God bless and keep you and bring you home safely to Sarah. Thank you and take care.
Posted by: Pamela at November 14, 2004 05:05 PM (AOFgp)
5
I raise my glass to you sir. For your and your words.
Posted by: Stephen Macklin at November 14, 2004 08:49 PM (U3CvV)
6
S's husband,
Well said, and more importantly, let me say thank you for your service. We are proud of you and the men and women in Iraq and the Stan and every other member of our armed forces.
We are also proud of the Sarah's of the world and your Sarah in particular.
Godspeed, buddy.
Posted by: Jim - PRS at November 14, 2004 09:47 PM (BjDAE)
7
Very well written. Thanks for your service and your words.
And Sarah, thanks for all your good work over the last many months.
I've linked this post.
Posted by: David Foster at November 14, 2004 11:15 PM (XUtCY)
8
This is just one more reason we're proud of our son-in-law. Well-written article. Stay safe. We love you.
Husband's In-laws
Posted by: Nancy at November 15, 2004 02:39 AM (YuW6k)
9
We too add our thanks to both of you - for your service, sacrifice and willingness to stand the line for the rest of us. We honor that daily, and appreciate reading this blog - we are simply a family in the heartland of this great country you represent who pray for you daily - Godspeed, and thanks again!
Posted by: K at November 15, 2004 03:59 AM (cgfwf)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
November 12, 2004
DEAD
Though I haven't mentioned it, I'm well aware that Arafat will be pushing up the daisies soon. Except he'll be encased in concrete instead of in his family's plot sleeping under a
pile of garbage and filth for eternity, which would be sweet justice. Regardless of where the old terrorist's bones reside, our household was thrilled. I haven't blogged about it because the husband is formulating an Arafat post that will be up sometime before he leaves this weekend. Stay tuned...
Posted by: Sarah at
06:52 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 83 words, total size 1 kb.
November 10, 2004
SORRY
So apparently a lot of hippies are taking
photos of their signs, saying they're sorry that Bushitler was re-elected. I've made my own photo to show what I'm sorry for.
Posted by: Sarah at
02:04 PM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 32 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: chris at November 10, 2004 02:15 PM (zH1Gw)
2
Great sign! My sentiments too!
Posted by: Nancy at November 10, 2004 06:22 PM (YuW6k)
3
Cute. this site is now rated PG-13. Don't think I can bring the class here.
Posted by: mary at November 10, 2004 09:58 PM (poXKw)
4
Great pic of you. I might add to the sign "we and the UN didn't finish....."
Posted by: Toni at November 10, 2004 10:29 PM (0Zfu9)
5
My sentiments exactly! Great post.
Posted by: Jim Shawley at November 11, 2004 01:49 AM (XyKf3)
6
Excellent -- I share your sentiments, Sarah.
ps - Great picture!
Posted by: david at November 15, 2004 12:20 AM (ZVhuO)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
65kb generated in CPU 0.0121, elapsed 0.0813 seconds.
50 queries taking 0.0741 seconds, 197 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.