December 11, 2008
T2: NON-JUDGMENTAL DAY
I've only seen the Terminator movies once before, and I was excited to see
T2 again. But...I had forgotten how frustrating it is. I mean, the premise of these movies is great: an unstoppable killing machine. (Though Lileks
is right that "the abuse that was once reserved for the Terminator is now doled out to human beings, and they not only arenÂ’t killed instantly, they are capable of acrobatic fistfights while hanging from one hand in a elevator shaft.") And this movie has the absolute greatest villain of all time. Robert Patrick turns my blood cold. He could play Santa Claus and I would be scared to death of him.
But the movie is just so interminably annoying. We're going to change the future and save three billion people from dying, but we can't kill anyone in the process because that's mean. John Connor might die and the world could end, but heaven forbid we kill a rent-a-cop. Enough with the lectures on morality and how evil technology is. Oh, and that speech that Sarah Connor gives about how all men do is destroy but women create because they have wombs blah blah blah. Give me a break.
I have lower standards than just about anyone when it comes to action movies. I will tolerate a lot of crap. But despite having the coolest bad guy of all time, T2 is really preachy. Stop with the voice-overs and get to the terminating already.
Posted by: Sarah at
05:59 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 249 words, total size 2 kb.
1
HAHAHAHA! So THAT's where Sally Field got her womb speech.
Posted by: Oda Mae at December 12, 2008 01:41 AM (6zvrq)
2
Oh the "men destroy, women create"thing drives me nuts.
Tell it to Rihab Taha (Saddam's Dr. Germ). Shoot, tell it to Casey Anthony. Apparently those women missed the memo.
Posted by: airforcewife at December 12, 2008 04:31 AM (Fb2PC)
3
Even when I first saw that, I thought it was pretty clear that Sarah Connor was unhinged and not to be listened to. Avoid unnecessary casualties, yes. But given the stakes, it wouldn't take much to justify collateral damage.
Posted by: Sig at December 12, 2008 02:14 PM (3E/Ak)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
December 04, 2008
FOAM PURGATORY, NOT AS BAD AS FOAM HELL
Dear Mare,
Today at work I had to put together the small version of the foam gingerbread house. It is not nearly as maddening, so if you are looking to buy one of these for torture purposes, I suggest splurging on the big one.
Well, the little one isn't as bad...provided it actually comes with all its pieces. Which mine did not.
Sigh.
I did take a photo of the masterpiece I put together the other day. Behold, in all its glory:
I also forgot to mention the other day that all I had to go on was a 2"x2" black and white photo of the thing. Hardly good instructions.
Each heart? Individually applied. I know I mentioned that. It's worth repeating.
Do not attempt this at home, kids.
Posted by: Sarah at
11:19 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 145 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Oh. My. WORD. That's beautiful! You are to be commended for your excellent craftiness and skill! :-) (And no, I won't attempt it at home, LOL!)
Posted by: kannie at December 04, 2008 12:42 PM (iT8dn)
2
Holy hearts! Great job.
Posted by: Susan at December 04, 2008 01:35 PM (kOpTG)
3
OMG! I want to get her the Valentine one. It's pink and princessy and my SIL will have to help her apply Each. Heart. Individually!!!!
I'll see if I can get my brother to video tape the process. We can put it on YouTube under the catergory "Head Explosions"
Serioulsy, you did a great job with that. I have button pictures for you.
Posted by: Mare at December 04, 2008 02:09 PM (APbbU)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
December 02, 2008
HELL MADE OF FOAM
Dear AWTM,
I would like to apologize for the present I gave you last Christmas. I had no idea.
You see, I loved the story of Pink Ninja wanting an activity set. It's one of my favorite kid stories ever. So when I found the foam nativity kits that you can build yourself, I thought it was perfect: it was both an activity and a nativity set!
I had never put together one of those kits before.
As I mentioned, I received all the Michaels store decorations for Valentine's Day already. Inclosed were several of those foam kits for pink gingerbread-style houses covered in hearts. It's my job to put them together for the store display.
I spent two hours on that house today. I am 31 years old.
The base of the thing was 10"x15". The house was a two-story castle with a turret and a covered porch. Covered in hearts. Which you have to individually attach.
Every time I tried to touch the roof, it fell off. And then the ceiling caved in.
You see in this picture of the little gingerbread house, you see how the seams don't exactly match up? Now try building a second story on top of that. And adding a roof with seams that don't match. I was ready to shoot myself.
And it seems I'm not the only one who's been in foam hell this week.
Two hours and a glue gun later, the Valentine's house is presentable. Provided no one goes near it, breathes on it, or even looks at it too piercingly.
And I still have three more kits to make.
So, AWTM, I am sorry if your activity set turned into an activity that made you want to kill me.
UPDATE:
With photo!
Posted by: Sarah at
10:16 AM
| Comments (9)
| Add Comment
Post contains 302 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Ha, first off, I cheated and used tape. Integrity, nope, not me, I used tape.
It was more frustrating for SR who is a DIRECTIONS kind of kid....
I think making the little people was the nightmare...
PN has her "activity set" from us out, I make her put it away at Christmas, and she protests heavily.
You will find when you have children, all sorts of simple activities turn into hell fast. Things like taking a simple toy out of a box, that some Sri Lanken or Chinese child has put twist ties on the entire thing....
no sweat...
It was the sweetest thought EVER.
Posted by: AWTM at December 02, 2008 10:57 AM (YTCu5)
2
Oh my gosh! ThatÂ’s the gingerbread project they were out of at my Michaels. And after reading your post, IÂ’m oh so glad they were!
I tried to sell the guys on the nativity scene, too, but it was a non-starter. Same with the snowman/Christmas tree set.
I canÂ’t even imagine having to put together a Foamie that people outside the family would actually see. Two years at it and I still havenÂ’t mastered Foamie building. Something tells me I never will!
Posted by: 9to5to9 at December 02, 2008 12:06 PM (LIfxS)
3
When I went to Michaels (alas, not yours) on Sunday, I saw similar kits and thought, no way I could make one. I'm now looking at
this page and thinking, you guys got any level 0 projects?
Lego is more my style, though I admit modern sets look too easy.
AWTM wrote:
You will find when you have children, all sorts of simple activities turn into hell fast.
At a party last Christmas, I found myself building and rebuilding a railroad set for a rambunctious kid. I was 36, and I wasn't getting better with practice.
Things like taking a simple toy out of a box, that some Sri Lanken or Chinese child has put twist ties on the entire thing....
So I'm not the only one who hates that. It's
work to take those things out. Wasn't like that when I was growing up. I've assumed it's an anti-shoplifting measure. Is it?
Yesterday I was looking at some robot action figures on my bookshelf and wondering if I should put them back into their boxes. There's no way I'd twist tie them. A shame, because I did keep all the ties, even though I'll never use them again.
Posted by: Amritas at December 02, 2008 12:35 PM (+nV09)
4
Sarah,
It's my job to put them together for the store display.
I used to look at Lego sets or Transformers on display and notice errors: a car stuck halfway to robothood, etc.
Your story has taught me to be less judgmental.
I probably couldn't do any better with today's toys. I don't know about modern Lego, but I've had trouble transforming modern Transformers. That's another reason I don't want my bots back in their boxes. The twist ties were just the beginning ...
Posted by: Amritas at December 02, 2008 12:51 PM (+nV09)
5
Oh my gosh - I was laughing so loud! Now you understand why I cringe whenever my friends give the kids "projects."
Posted by: She of the Sea at December 02, 2008 03:40 PM (RoRp+)
6
That was hilarious. I give my neice and nephew loud/complicated/messy toys just to annoy my sister in law. Like the color your own umbrella kit with the permanent markers.
Why, yes, that is the sound of me going straight to hell.
I have to find one of these foamie projects.
Posted by: Mare at December 03, 2008 04:05 AM (APbbU)
7
sarah - i am laughing so hard. And laughing even harder at mare who is heading to michaels to stock up!!!
Posted by: keri at December 03, 2008 05:01 AM (HXpRG)
8
Sarah? I used to work for the company that designed those and, at least 2 years ago, those were our sets you're talking about.
Hell. They are hell. Torture. Pure and simple. Nativity sets should be blessed. I told the designers and my boss they were EVIL for even putting them on the market.
And, you're crafty. Imagine me, someone with NO SKILLS tryin' to do those. I bought one for a 4 year old so we could do it together. Yeah, he took it away from me. Told me he's better off doin' it alone. He was right.
There is a reason I'm called the Anti Craft.
Good luck.
Posted by: Tammi at December 03, 2008 05:24 AM (pWX3U)
9
A whole lot of 'splainin' going on. So funny.
I made a village for my kids out of posterboard, about 40 years ago. It went real well and lasted for years.
Foamies... I dunno. ;-)
Posted by: Ruth H at December 03, 2008 12:29 PM (Y4oAO)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
FAIL
Lie, Cheat and Steal: High School Ethics Surveyed
In the past year, 30 percent of U.S. high school students have stolen from a store and 64 percent have cheated on a test, according to a new, large-scale survey suggesting that Americans are too apathetic about ethical standards.
Let the record show that I have never shoplifted or cheated on a test.
Educators reacting to the findings questioned any suggestion that today's young people are less honest than previous generations, but several agreed that intensified pressures are prompting many students to cut corners.
"The competition is greater, the pressures on kids have increased dramatically," said Mel Riddle of the National Association of Secondary School Principals. "They have opportunities their predecessors didn't have (to cheat). The temptation is greater."
Even back in my day, we had graphing calculators that stored information in them. I don't remember any of my friends using that storage to cheat. But regardless, this person is gonna argue that greater competition and opportunity is an excuse for cheating?
Despite such responses, 93 percent of the students said they were satisfied with their personal ethics and character, and 77 percent affirmed that "when it comes to doing what is right, I am better than most people I know."
Sick. That's the result of parents and their unconditional love and praise. Heaven forbid you hurt little Johnny's self-esteem by telling him he needs to "live and act within the limit of your knowledge and keep expanding it to the limit of your life."
"A lot of people like to blame society's problems on young people, without recognizing that young people aren't making the decisions about what's happening in society," said Dzurinko, 32. "They're very easy to scapegoat."
FAIL. Young people will be making those decisions in ten years, and they have a foundation of cheating and stealing to build on. They're not scapegoats if they admit their immoral behavior. We are totally boned when they become businessmen, educators, and politicians.
"This generation is leading incredibly busy lives -- involved in athletics, clubs, so many with part-time jobs, and -- for seniors -- an incredibly demanding and anxiety-producing college search," he offered as an explanation.
FAIL. Getting into college is stressful, so I'm gonna go out and shoplift, you know, to take the edge off.
I find it incredible that all these principals and administrators are making excuses for these results. Actually, no, I don't find it incredible: I think it's the reason they came up with these results. Adults coddle kids entirely too much these days. They want kids to like them. You know what my philosophy is? Your teenager should hate you...until he's about 25. Then he should start to grok everything you did for him. I am still realizing all the lessons my parents taught me, and I try to inform them when I have finally understood why they did the things they did. And I'm glad they didn't try to "be my friend" when I was in high school. Shoot, my mother doesn't even try to be my friend today; she still lets me know when she thinks I have acted wrong.
"We have to create situations where it's easy for kids to do the right things," he added. "We need to create classrooms where learning takes on more importance than having the right answer."
Weeping Jesus on the cross: FAIL.
There is nothing more important in school than having the right answer. I can't think of any other response to that last quote that doesn't involve cuss words. And you don't create situations for people to do the right thing; you teach young people the right thing to do and then expect them to do it, even when it's hard. That's what morals and values are for!
I don't have any kids yet, much less teenagers. But I have thought about it constantly for the past two years, and I have closely observed the parents around me, looking for what works and what doesn't. And you know how I said I love my husband with my brain instead of my heart? I will love my children the same way. I don't believe in unconditional live; I believe love is earned through thoughts and actions. And I vow that I will never watch my child become a shoplifter and a cheat and then make the kinds of excuses found in this article.
I have a friend who recently said, "Normally when a childless person talks about what she'll do when she has kids, I roll my eyes and think 'just you wait.' But with you, I actually think you will do all these things you say you'll do."
I considered that an enormous compliment.
Posted by: Sarah at
05:25 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 789 words, total size 5 kb.
1
I saw the figures
yesterday at Joanne Jacobs and dreaded to read the details.
I don't think it's just about parenting. Contemporary American culture is about ends, not means. How you get from point A to B -
"phase 2" - doesn't matter. Cheating? Lies? "Equalizing" laws? "Everybody" does it, right?
But you never did.
Some may think your nobility is misguided, even pointless. They may mock it.
Why?
Have you ever noticed the way people speak of members of strict religious sects, such as the Amish or the Mormons? There is a tone of amusement, of making fun of their unusual beliefs or outlandish customs. But mixed with it there is a hesitant admiration, a grudging respect for those who have chosen to hold themselves to a strict moral standard--those who not only have something to believe, but who act in accord with their beliefs.
- Ron Merrill
I heard that some people rejected Romney in the primaries because he was "too perfect." Pathetic coming from Republicans who pride themselves on being "superior" to Democrats. I am not a Romney supporter - I endorsed no candidate - but rejection of Romney on such grounds still angers me.
Some people cannot stand the good because it reminds them of the evil in themselves.
Kill by laughter ... Learn to use it as a weapon of destruction. Turn it into a sneer ... Don't let anything remain sacred in a man's soul - and his soul won't be sacred to him. Kill reverence and you've killed the hero in man.
- Ellsworth Toohey in
The Fountainhead
Posted by: Amritas at December 02, 2008 08:57 AM (+nV09)
2
Amritas, I'm right there with you - there are efforts on every side to mock the good and discredit it - whether in families or public figures - as "isolated" or "ignorant" or "impractical." And I feel that part of the reason for the success of those efforts is (yet another "i"?) intimidation. Political correctness makes it difficult to discuss values and morals without painting a great big target on your forehead for some variety of "hatemonger" accusation.
Our Founders were very clear, though, that the success of our form of government was (I'd say "completely") dependent on individual virtue and moral character. (Cicero and Natural Law and all... I'm not an expert yet, but I'm loving the learning!) Human beings have moral character inherent in them, and when society denies it, we really, really suffer.
So... while we try to keep virtue from being chased from the public square, I feel that it's ever more critical to have strong families and moral individuals (since it's a lot easier to teach with reinforcement!). Way to teach right & wrong, Sarah! :-)
And I have to say, I like the "Amish or the Mormons" quote in your comment; as one of the latter, it's flattering :-). One of my favorite quotes actually comes from Joseph Smith and ties right into this whole discussion; very lightly paraphrased, it's "teach the people correct principles, and they govern themselves."
Posted by: kannie at December 02, 2008 01:50 PM (iT8dn)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
December 01, 2008
HUH?
Just heard on the radio: "The historic move to make Hillary Clinton Secretary of State..."
I don't get it. What's historic about it? We currently have a female Secretary of State. What, it's historic to give a former president's wife such an important job?
Yep, still cynical.
Posted by: Sarah at
06:03 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 49 words, total size 1 kb.
1
EVERYTHING about P.E. Obama is historic. Get it?
Posted by: airforcewife at December 01, 2008 08:15 AM (Fb2PC)
2
Deluded conservatives are convinced that Condoleezza Rice is a "woman" (their spelling, not ours). All small-r right thinking people know that sexist right-wing extremists are opposed to womyn in government.
These same insane subhumyns also believe that Rice is an African-American.
We pity their inability to grasp the true underlying reality.
Posted by: kevin at December 01, 2008 09:54 AM (+nV09)
3
I don't get it. Is this a troll, or sarcasm, or just weird?
Sig
Posted by: Sig at December 01, 2008 02:27 PM (542IL)
4
Well, Hillary is the first female Secretary of State who *doesn't* have a PhD....I guess that's a milestone of some kind.
Posted by: david foster at December 02, 2008 12:02 PM (d098a)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
66kb generated in CPU 0.0155, elapsed 0.0811 seconds.
51 queries taking 0.0717 seconds, 194 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.