May 19, 2010


I know it's awful, but that's not the point.  The point is that it's a generic depiction of Muhammad and I'm participating in today because I think it's important.  Let us not be cowed.

Posted by: Sarah at 07:58 PM | Comments (5) | Add Comment
Post contains 38 words, total size 1 kb.

1 I didn't even get that creative -- I Snapshot'd the Mohammed from the Supreme Court building

Posted by: Lissa at May 20, 2010 08:05 AM (eSfKC)

2 Gasp! We are shocked, shocked by such insensitive idolatry! As Allah, Most High said:

"And who is more unjust than those who try to create the likeness of My creation? Let them create an atom, or let them create a wheat grain, or let them create a barley grain."

- Sahih al-Bukhari, Volume 9, Book 93, Number 648

Even if the Prophet (pbuh) were never depicted again, one depiction of any object is too many. Homer Simpson, Stan Marsh, and Peter Griffin must go!

Posted by: kevin at May 20, 2010 10:14 AM (5a7nS)

3 Did anyone notice the translation of that hadith included the word "atom"? I wonder what the original word meant.

Wikipedia has a gallery of Muslim visual depictions of Muhammad.

It's fitting that kevin refers to cartoon characters as "objects" since he believes in a dehumanizing ideology.

Posted by: Amritas at May 20, 2010 10:23 AM (5a7nS)

4 damn, I all expected a stick figure with typical garb! No matter, I see you're point and I like it. Good work, Sarah

Posted by: Sara at May 20, 2010 02:53 PM (675FB)

Posted by: Amritas at May 20, 2010 07:17 PM (hBtE2)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
43kb generated in CPU 0.0124, elapsed 0.1608 seconds.
48 queries taking 0.0839 seconds, 172 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.