June 09, 2006
WOO HOO
It's hard to put into words how I've been feeling for the last six weeks. My friends from Germany keep wondering if the magic has worn off yet, and I can honestly say that I'm thrilled it hasn't. I still bounce out of my seat when we pass a Dairy Queen or an Arby's. I walk slowly through every aisle in Walmart, trying to take it all in. And I laugh every time I notice something that is different from the way my life was for the past three years.
The biggest joke I've noticed is that my husband and I are complete suckers for advertising right now. Since we went for three years without commercials, we find ourselves buying into the hype. Sonic runs a commercial for a junior banana split, and I immediately want to go out and get one. Quizno's runs a new sandwich, and we go get it for dinner. We even saw some dumb commercial for a Crunch bar, and my husband and I turned to each other and said, "Heck, I don't even really like Crunch, but I sure want one now!" I find myself wanting the Nicer Dicer and the Total Gym and everything else I see on TV. I hope this wears off soon!
Another thing I've noticed is that I talk to everyone. Waiters, strangers, people in line...I just have this overwhelming urge to chat. I spent three years avoiding small talk and praying that salesclerks would not ask me any hard questions, so I can't stop jabbering at everyone. I love talking to people!
I'm also not used to air conditioning, so I'm freezing my butt off. I had forgotten how shocking it is to go in and out of buildings in the US, to constantly go from 60 degrees to 95.
And cruise control is heaven.
Posted by: Sarah at
05:07 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 311 words, total size 2 kb.
1
If there is such a thing as blogging bulemia, you have it. Wow...four posts in one day...I am giddy! Nice to see you back online...and I would love to see all those trainees, too.
Posted by: CaliValleyGirl at June 09, 2006 06:34 AM (xZpK7)
2
The Total Gym is...how should I say this...completely gay?
Get yourself a Bowflex or whatever that company sells! It's GOOD STUFF!
See you on the high ground!
MajorDad1984
Posted by: MajorDad1984 at June 14, 2006 03:17 PM (j7S/Q)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
May 22, 2006
DAYQUIL
I've been fighting a cold for a few days, but keeping "bachelor hours" with our friend this weekend did me in. On the way home from Des Moines, I wanted to stop at Walmart to get some DayQuil. What I didn't count on was the asinine rules that are in place now for flippin' meth labs. Even though the Walmart is 24 hours, you can't buy DayQuil at 9 AM on a Sunday because you have to get it from the pharmacist and the pharmacy doesn't open until 11. Of all the annoying things! Luckily I could get Robitussin; apparently it doesn't make good meth. But I still had to get permission from a Walmart employee with braces to buy the stuff! If I were trucking out a cart load, maybe someone could raise an eyebrow, but I wanted one bottle and I was coughing my fool head off at the time. What has the world come to when we can't even buy normal over-the-counter medicines without suspicion?
Posted by: Sarah at
07:01 AM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
Post contains 170 words, total size 1 kb.
1
If we can't agree about Iraq, can we all agree that it is time to surrender in the war on drugs? :-)
Posted by: Pericles at May 22, 2006 07:21 AM (eKf5G)
2
I had the same problem when we first got back. I was pregnant and could only take Sudafed for my runny nose. And even if the Pharmacy is open you couldn't get more than 5 boxes of Sudafed in one purchase and you had to be over 18! My goodness, who in their right mind would need more than 1 box for anything other than meth? Shamful what people will do for drugs in this country.
Posted by: Angie Dente at May 22, 2006 09:01 AM (ec43W)
3
I was surprised to run into this meth inspired rule also. As a result, I feel like I'm being watched when I buy my bi-weekly supply (1 box) of benadryll for me allergy prone family.
It's a sad state we are in.
Posted by: Vonn at May 22, 2006 11:14 AM (dEgRi)
4
Am I the only one who can go to the local drugstore (like Sav-on's) and get two or three boxes of DayQuil/NyQuil off the shelf? Where do you guys all live?
Posted by: fuzz at May 22, 2006 06:41 PM (jCzrD)
5
This is what I get to look forward to when we move back? Eek, I promise I am not cooking meth at home, I swear.
Posted by: Household6 at May 23, 2006 03:22 AM (Gj0PV)
6
Well, Sarah was in Des Moines for one thing. Iowa has a major meth problem and this is one of the ways that they are trying to combat it. Not a very smart way to do so imho. I've also ran up against the 'no pharmacist' problem late at night (I work 3rd shift).
I think its sad that you have to go through more identification verification to get some decent cold medicine, but you don't have to do jack to vote.
Posted by: John at May 24, 2006 12:27 AM (crTpS)
7
Remember when we had that war on drugs and there was no more drugs? That was awesome. I'll be glad when the war on Terror is over and there's no more terror. I hope it's as effective as the war on drugs.
Posted by: Will at May 27, 2006 07:00 AM (eIQfa)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
May 11, 2006
EDUCATION
Last night we got an education. My father-in-law knows a guy at work who raises gamecocks. We went out to his house and learned all about cockfighting. It was extremely interesting, but also sad. You can tell this man loves these roosters, so I can't imagine how he could risk their lives. But he's been fighting roosters since he was six years old and is really knowledgeable about every aspect of their diet and breeding. I've never really thought of roosters as beautiful animals, but they really were. It was an interesting evening.
Posted by: Sarah at
08:40 AM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
Post contains 95 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Ok, you know I'm going to comment on this one...
Is cockfighting even legal in the states? Maybe I'm totally oblivious, but I thought there was basically a country-wide ban on fighting animals. Hmm...I don't like it.
But I'm sure you knew I would say that.

But yeah, roosters really are beautiful. They can be such vile creatures (I had one that attacked my dad every time he saw him), but they are so pretty.
Posted by: Erin at May 11, 2006 09:13 AM (5tInL)
2
http://www.hsus.org/hsus_field/animal_fighting_the_final_round/cockfighting_fact_sheet/
Cockfighting is legal in some states. Not the good ones though.
Posted by: Will at May 11, 2006 01:42 PM (eIQfa)
3
I nearly lost my eye to a rooster attacking me. Wait a second let me clarify that: two roosters attacking me. Smart f*ckers. They both flew at my face. And I was totally innocent. I was just walking to the garage and they came at me. I was screaming and my mother came out of the house and ran them off. Suffice to say that my brothers rounded them up later that day, and were thrilled that my mother let them use their "Back to the Basics" book to figure out how to build a chicken slaughtering device, and actually be able to use it.
We never had any problems with our hens, we even let one of them into the house...she was pretty friendly and would go eat out of the catfood bowl. And I painted the toenails of another. Okay...somehow my childhood in Hawaii is starting to look like I grew up in West Virginia.
It's great to hear your stories about home!
Posted by: calivalleygirl at May 11, 2006 08:23 PM (S+dD7)
4
Will, are you Canadian?
Posted by: Erin at May 13, 2006 01:26 AM (JI+tN)
5
Erin,
I'm currently American - Born and raised in Memphis (actually Bartlett, which is a suburb), but I went to school in Vancouver, Canada, and now I live here, and I'm in the process of becoming a Canadian. (dual citizenship.)
Posted by: Will at May 13, 2006 08:38 AM (eIQfa)
6
Sarah... what's going on?
Posted by: Will at May 17, 2006 09:00 AM (eIQfa)
7
Sarah...
I want you to freakin' blog! I click on your link at least 14 times a day, hoping I'll find something new. But instead, I just see little robots commenting on your site. I MISS YOU!!!! I want to know what you're doing!!
Posted by: Erin at May 17, 2006 09:23 AM (5aFPk)
8
I am not a robot. Really.
Posted by: Will at May 17, 2006 01:06 PM (eIQfa)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
April 29, 2006
NOPE
I guess I want to comment on this rumor about an
Atlas Shrugged movie. I'm so not going to see it. I love this horrible synopsis of the book:
The Russian-born author's seminal tome, published in 1957, revolves around the economic collapse of the U.S. sometime in the future and espouses her individualistic philosophy of objectivism.
My husband came home ranting about this, saying that Hollywood types might be surprised to find that the "economic collapse of the U.S." isn't because of global warming or Bushitler's junta. This book is about the triumph of capitalism, so it's ironic that they're considering Miss UN for the lead role. Seriously, Angelina Jolie is a fan of this book? She can read?
And I'd love to see the trainwreck that is Oliver Stone's version of The Fountainhead.
Posted by: Sarah at
11:39 AM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
Post contains 136 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Those will be good ones to watch after I they are free on cable, and even then only to watch the 'train wreck', as you say! I'm not sure that it could translate to a movie, even when done by people who understand it. Jolie as Dagny Taggert and Brad Pitt as John Galt? .... NOT!
Posted by: Barb at April 29, 2006 12:25 PM (g9qHI)
2
Oops, I meant to add that this description just points out the uselessness of Hollyweird even attempting these two movies : "Rand's individualistic and character-driven stories ..."
They obviously don't get Rand or objectivism.
Posted by: Barb at April 29, 2006 12:28 PM (g9qHI)
3
I expect they will play up the romantic angles while downplaying or outright ignoring any of the underlying philosophical motivations. Atlas Shrugged will be reduced to a love story.
Posted by: Stephen Macklin at April 29, 2006 05:51 PM (DdRjH)
4
An Atlas Shrugged film could be the greatest fantasy film since Lord of the Rings. I just hope it's not too fantastic - industrialists who are responsible... CEOs who are hardworking and actually know how stuff works... it's a hell of a good yarn though.
Posted by: Will at April 30, 2006 02:32 PM (eIQfa)
5
Why the shot at Jolie's literacy? I thought you were above assuming that everyone who disagrees with your politics is unintelligent. Are you willing to believe that I'm literate? I don't follow her all that closely, but my impression is that she puts her money where her mouth is in a way that a lot of spokes celebrities don't. I would think that you could admire that even if hyou don't completely share her principles.
Plus, she's hot.
Posted by: Pericles at April 30, 2006 08:16 PM (eKf5G)
6
Is she hot? Really? I'm told she is, but I've seen her picture everywhere, and I think I'm missing something. I assume I'm wrong on the matter, and I'll try harder to see her hotness in the future, but I just hope TV and People Magazine aren't lying to me again.
Posted by: Will at May 01, 2006 03:33 PM (eIQfa)
7
I didn't see it at first either.

And I do feel awfully bad for Jennifer Aniston. Still, yeah.
Posted by: Pericles at May 02, 2006 05:56 AM (eKf5G)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
April 11, 2006
THINGS ON THE TV
I really like these new AFN commercials where a talking computer compares military benefits to the civilian world. I've seen ones about pay raises, vacation days, and medical care. I think it's important for soldiers to know how their benefits compare to the outside world because it's easy to gripe about the Army, but another job might not be any better.
But what I don't like on TV is being lectured to, especially by an ex-stripper. My husband and I watched the "Secrets and Flies" episode of CSI last night. The story revolved around an organization that finds mothers for abandoned embryos. The woman who was killed was a single Christian mother who adopted a leftover fertilized egg from a fertility clinic because she believed that every embryo is a baby from the minute it's fertilized in a laboratory dish. And the CSI cast openly rolled their eyes and scoffed at this organization. Catherine, the ex-stripper, pulled out all these quotes about papal precedent to argue with the head of this organization. The beat-us-over-the-head Message on the show was that pro-lifers are complete nutjobs, and all the CSI characters agreed. There was no inter-office discussion of the matter; it was just settled and blatantly woven into the script that this was insane.
Cop dramas have been doing this for a while. I wrote a while back about similar propaganda in Law & Order. I'm tired of shows painting right-wing ideas as looney. I honestly don't think this "embryo adoption" thing is that weird. If a couple is willing to give away their extra embryos and someone is willing to take them, then everybody's happy. But you should've seen these CSIs' faces: they were completely disgusted by the whole thing. I don't understand why.
I'm not 100% sure what my view is on abortion. I struggle with one fundamental paradox: If an unwed teen gets pregnant, then we start talking about "at what day is it actually a baby", but if a happily married couple gets pregnant, it's obviously a baby from day one. I know when I get pregnant that it will be a baby from the beginning, and I don't care what day the heart starts beating or the blood starts circulating. So if it's a baby for me, I should see it as a baby for everyone. But I still can't say that abortion is absolutely murder. My thoughts on the topic are kind of messy, and thank goodness I've never had to really work through them.
That said, I respect people who do think that it's murder, and I admire someone who might consider adopting an embryo to give every baby a chance. I certainly would never roll my eyes at her or argue with her about what the pope said in the 16th century (which is what the CSI did). All other things being equal, I respect the right-wing position on abortion more than I do the left-wing position, even though I fall somewhere in between. So why is it obvious that the message on TV is that the right-wingers are nuts?
Posted by: Sarah at
02:09 AM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
Post contains 524 words, total size 3 kb.
1
Sarah,
I actually kind of disagree with you on this one (even though I'll save most of my comments for a real conversation with you).
I think in comparison to adopting a live baby (one that has already been created, born, and neglected), adopting embryos is a little nutty. I'm not quite sure how I feel about abortion either...and yes, if and when I get pregnant, the embryo inside of me will always be referred to as "the baby."
Having said that, I think scientifically, I can understand why the characters of CSI scoffed at adopting embryos. If we imagine that these characters are real people, then we can understand that they are around DNA, micro-organisms, and all kinds of teeny-tiny blobs of goop all the time. They are probably more capable of lumping embryos into the "teeny-tiny blobs of goop" category than you and I are.
But...I do agree with you that more and more, tv shows are making fun of righties...sometimes justifiably (there are a lot of righty crazies out there), but a lot of times it's just over the top.
Posted by: Erin at April 11, 2006 05:17 AM (7oVGv)
2
Hey, if Erin disagreed, do I have to agree now?

I don't really watch this new spate of cop shows, but from what I've seen I actually find them kind of right wing, in a different respect. The prime suspects are always really guilty; the cops and DAs never go after the wrong people. That hardly sends a message about the importance of civil rights. If the shows were liberal agitprop, half of the cops would belong to the KKK, and the DAs would sit around laughing about how they were sending innocent people to prison. In fact, it seems like his character is constantly lecturing the audience, from the little bits of the show I've seen. (And his co-star Angie Harmon spoke at the 2004 Republican National Convention.)
Posted by: Pericles at April 11, 2006 06:34 AM (eKf5G)
3
Oh, I forgot to say... I don't think that it is quite true to say that couples thnk of embryos just like they do babies. I've had family members suffer miscarriages, and while this was upsetting and sad, it was still nothing like the loss of a baby would have been. They may have called it "the baby," but the attachment wasn't that strong yet. In fact, a pretty high percentage of pregnancies end in very early spontaneous miscarriages, for no apparent reason. I never hear about anyone regarding this as any kind of tragedy, or even like a public health problem comparable to SIDS.
Posted by: Pericles at April 11, 2006 06:40 AM (eKf5G)
4
Erin -- OK, maybe the idea of adopting embryos is not mainstream, but I don't think it's nearly as weird as some of the other right-wing stuff on these shows: they often feature fanatic pro-lifers who kill abortion doctors or extreme religions where the dads impregnate teenage daughters and stuff. I think this one isn't quite so "out there", but the CSIs acted like they were in the same camp with cult types. I think there's at least room for discussion about adopting embryos, which is in a completely different realm than killing Planned Parenthood workers. But CSI seemed to treat them like they're the same. Catherine was overly pissed off at the woman, barking about stem cell research and pro-choice stuff. I just thought it was too much.
Pericles -- Hmm, never thought about that. They do always solve the crime and rarely does some "innocent black man go to jail for a crime a rich white kid committed", or some other "liberal" idea like that.
Posted by: Sarah at April 11, 2006 06:49 AM (uJOsU)
5
I quit watching CSI a while ago - too gruesome and tawdry. I loved them for the science and whodunnit aspect problem solving stuff. But the gratuitous flesh and sex-oriented stuff was just too much.
How did the treatment of the organization compare to say, the furries - where people dressed up as animals and had orgies? They were pretty much, well, weird to me, but ok. Certainly didn't call them stupid or debate the leader.
Posted by: PhilS at April 11, 2006 02:00 PM (aeR5+)
6
PhilS -- Good call, I forgot about that one. With all the sex stuff on that show, no one ever moralizes. Remember the dominatrix one, where Grissom talks to the "madam" like they're both scientists? I just think it's a double standard.
Posted by: Sarah at April 11, 2006 03:11 PM (uJOsU)
7
Part of becoming a human being is growing and evolving in your mother's womb, so I don't think an embryo in a petri dish can be called a baby. Adopting an embryo is about the same as adopting the stain on Lewinsky's dress.
Posted by: Will at April 11, 2006 07:14 PM (eIQfa)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
April 03, 2006
MR SMITH
Yesterday I actually sat and watched an entire hour of Al Franken. It wasn't as torturous as I thought it would be. I thought Tim Russert did a great job of keeping Franken honest, and I would love to see Russert interview someone like Ann Coulter the same way.
At one point, Al Franken said that what he'd really like to see is for Bush and Cheney to come clean with the world. He said they should give a "six hour long speech" (wow) in which they delineate everything they did wrong in Iraq. He wants their mea culpa to include everything from inaccurate pre-war intelligence to not stopping the looters after the fall of Baghdad. Franken said that after Bush and Cheney admitted they had been wrong about everything under the sun, then the international community could forgive them and the Democrats would gladly sit down and draft a bipartisan plan for Iraq.
I started thinking about transparency in government. The husband and I have been watching 24 recently. "President David Palmer" is probably close to everyone's ideal president. He went straight to the media when he learned his son might've killed someone. He ratted out his campaign contributors when he figured out they were dirty. And he divorced his wife during the primaries because she became too power hungry. In watching 24, you can't help but think that if all politicians had half of Palmer's integrity, the world would be a better place.
But if everyone wants Mr. Smith to go to Washington, why does it never happen in real life?
There are things that Bush and Cheney could've done differently with Iraq. I'm sure they know this. But I honestly don't think that it's appropriate for anyone to give a six hour apology while the war is still going on. And I honestly believe someone would still find something that Bush left out of his six hour speech to complain about. Lord knows there are times when I wish for more honesty in Washington (Would someone please step to the plate and call Cynthia McKinney a race-baiting bitch?) but I don't expect it to ever happen. Politics is a tricky game, and any one thing you say can haunt you for life (see "Read my lips", "I did not have sex with that woman", and "I actually did vote for the $87 billion before I voted against it.") No matter what Al Franken says, I don't think a big apology would make any of his opponents respect President Bush more, and I guarantee something from his apology speech would become a soundbite in the next election.
I often think I'm too thin-skinned to blog, so I know for sure that thin-skinned people certainly can't get into politics. I lie in bed worrying about how President Bush sleeps at night knowing his face is superimposed over a swastika; I'm sure he must be the type of man who waves it off and keeps going. We need our politicians to be thick-skinned, aggressive, and tough. We need them to play the game at the level that everyone else does, like it or not. Mr. Smith really wouldn't last long.
We may think we want Bobby running Ewing Oil, but in a world of dirty dealers, JR's the man for the job. Sad as that may be.
Posted by: Sarah at
02:29 AM
| Comments (9)
| Add Comment
Post contains 561 words, total size 3 kb.
1
Wow. Very well said! Politics is a game that I am very often uncomfortable watching. I wouldn't survive one minute as a player!
I admire Pres. Bush. I don't agree with everything he says or does but I think his actions and decisions are based on his convictions (not current polls) and I think his intentions are generally good. What I mean by that is that he can look beyond his own personal best interests.
I'm glad I found your blog. I enjoy it very much.
Posted by: lou at April 03, 2006 10:16 AM (0+7qK)
2
Very well said. But that said, I cannot imagine sitting through an hour long interview with Al Franken, doing it or watching it. I wish I had seen Russert hold a liberals feet to the fire.
I also admire our president and I really feel that many of the trouble in Iraq have been caused by politicians in the US Congress. Remember I am old enough to remember WWII, Korean War, Vietnam War and all the rest of the military actions taken by us.
Political interference does not make it easy to win a war.
Posted by: Ruth H at April 03, 2006 03:06 PM (IJB/r)
3
The whole "Bush should admit his mistakes" canard is just a colossal political gotcha game. Nobody wants a president who second guesses himself in public. Democrats don't give a rat's ass if he admits mistakes or not. They just want to paint him into a corner by leveling that criticism. It's a no win situation, because if he does it, they can call him incompetent and weak, if he doesn't they say he's secretive and arrogant.
You can look back at any presidency in history and point out things that might have been done differently. But that's for historians to do. A sitting president should never ever do it. Not only does it weaken the country in the eyes of the world, it's a great way to lose elections.
Posted by: annika at April 04, 2006 01:55 AM (fxTDF)
4
Would anyone sane think that it would have been a good idea for FDR and Churchill to make a 6-hour speech on all the things the Allies had done wrong during WWII (and there were plenty) while the war is going on?
Posted by: David Foster at April 04, 2006 11:13 AM (/Z304)
5
Nice. Very well said,very well written.
Posted by: Mary at April 04, 2006 05:27 PM (YwdKL)
6
I'm with Annika. We do want to see our President as strong, especially in times like these and I think he has done a great job of keeping his head up and giving at least some of us something to rely on.
Posted by: Nicole at April 04, 2006 05:32 PM (Sa9Kb)
7
Sarah,
You already know I completely agree with you on this...
But I think everyone wants to see a picture of your very first hand-made quilt.
Erin
Posted by: Erin at April 05, 2006 03:50 PM (GyYB2)
8
I don't want George Bush to apologize for anything. The kinds of things he would be apologizing for are the kinds of things that can't be apologized for. He should stand or fall by his own words.
Posted by: Will at April 06, 2006 12:42 AM (eIQfa)
9
What should have happened, several years ago, is that Rumsfeld should have resigned, and maybe Cheney, too. Even Powell, maybe, should have left before the end of the first term. Someone has to take responsibility for mistakes. And whatever you say about the decision to go to war, Rumsfeld's failure to use more troops was a mistake.
Posted by: Pericles at April 10, 2006 06:37 AM (eKf5G)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
March 23, 2006
FOCUS
I just had a long talk with Erin about how pessimistic and depressed I've been feeling lately. I can't read LGF without wanting to cry. My stomach is still in knots about Iran. And I just watched Season 2 of
24, which is reason enough to want to crawl in a hole. I'm losing it. And then I remembered
Smink's advice:
First, go buy a six pack and swig it all down.
Then, watch “Ace Ventura.”
And after that, buy a Hard Rock Café shirt and come talk to me.
You really need to lighten up, man.
I don't have a Hard Rock shirt, but maybe my "I saw the Pope -- Des Moines 1979" shirt will work? And we certainly have beer and Ace Ventura. That's what my husband and I will do tonight, because I sure need a way to relax.
I also found that my spirits were lifted reading the Tanker Brothers blog today. I realized that I want to focus on reading MilBlogs for a while; soldiers always make me feel rejuvinated.
Posted by: Sarah at
11:44 AM
| Comments (9)
| Add Comment
Post contains 178 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Hey, LGF makes me cry, too.
Posted by: Pericles at March 23, 2006 12:19 PM (ra2qX)
2
LGF makes me angry - it's the new McCarthy for a new era of fear.
Also, I swallowed a pop can tab accidentally, and I'm quite worried about it.
Posted by: Will Somerset at March 23, 2006 03:05 PM (eIQfa)
3
Reading some Churchill might help, Sarah. Things looked pretty bad in the mid-late 1930s, too, and we came out of it OK. Try "The Last Lion: Alone" by William Manchester.
Posted by: David Foster at March 23, 2006 08:13 PM (qzQdM)
4
Not that I expect you care especially, but FYI, I have not been around much lately since a while back I had a few very severe seizures and have been busily bouncing around to hospitals to neurologists to radiologists to oncologists. At this point they are not assuring me that I will be alive through the end of the year, though it is still an open question whether I will recover - there are still seemingly endless tests that need to be done (and redone). On the plus side, MRIs do offer one a fair amount of time for contemplation and self reflection, just use good earplugs.
Sadly I still have to work, though fortunately I can telecommute a lot, and I have good insurance. So I have been trying not to waste time on the internet (this is just a slip), but instead spending my time with things more important - reading good books that needed to be read or re-read (thank God for Plato and Plotinus) and spending more time with my Piano. There were a lot of things I never got around to. Now I realize that there are a lot I never will master that I wish I could have - lots of Chopin's beautiful waltzes, Beethoven's brilliant Sonatas (but still too hard dangit), Bach inventions, (the Goldberg variations are definitely not going to happen, alas, though they probably never would even if I live to be 100) and so on. I will be working on what I can, though since the meds make mind a bit fuzzy and my hands a bit slow, it is all the more time intensive. And of course, most of all, I need to hang out with the kids as much as possible.
Kind regards and best wishes. Even if I fully recover I'll not be back, as I realize I should be spending my time on more important things.
Sophia and me
Posted by: Mr. Silly at March 24, 2006 03:37 PM (xJvll)
5
Mr Silly -- I truly am very sorry to hear that. Though you and I never saw eye to eye, I certainly have never wished you harm or sadness. I hope that you do recover and live every moment to the fullest.
All my best wishes,
Sarah
Posted by: Sarah at March 24, 2006 03:51 PM (016Fe)
6
I found myself in the same boat as you today... so as I was reading through MilBlogs, I found you. Great site for me to find tonight. First: love your post on March 16th. Secondly: love the link you have to Homestar Runner. Many of my friends/family don't 'get' Homestar, but my husband is a HUGE fan. Now that he's 6 mo. into an 18 mo. deployment, there's no one for me to throw lines back and forth with. So it made me smile. Thanks for that!
Posted by: Emily at March 24, 2006 08:36 PM (ux3w4)
7
Mr. Silly: Stay strong, man.
Posted by: Pericles at March 24, 2006 10:48 PM (eKf5G)
8
Mr. Silly,
I am saddened by your news. To think about all the bickering that has occurred in recent months, it makes me realize how menial it is in the grand scheme of things. I love my daughter with all my heart, and as a mother I sometimes get defensive when I read comments that have attacked her personally or miscontrued what she actually was trying to say. It must be very difficult to be burdened with this sadness, and I pray that either a miracle will occur and you will get well or that you will be able to live life to the fullest before it is your time to go. I've always told my kids not to judge a person until "you have walked a mile in their shoes." In light of your situation, my on-line exchanges with you now make me realize that I need to be more tolerant and understanding of those with different opinions even if I do disagree. It doesn't hurt to get one of life's lessons even at the age of 59. Take care and God bless.
Nancy
Sarah's Mama
Posted by: Nancy at March 26, 2006 04:20 PM (6s7Zq)
9
Mr. Silly, good luck to you in your efforts to recover your health, and consider that (from my family experience, for whatever that's worth) true, deep-seated optimism has a way of making itself medically apparent. As a cellist, my favorite Chopin is his cello sonata as recorded so intimately by Du Pre and Barenboim, which I someday hope to sit down and tackle... :-)
IMHO, the passion generated by political difference has no place in the deeply personal circumstances of illness, and I sincerely wish for you a full recovery.
-Piercello
Posted by: piercello at March 26, 2006 11:29 PM (plBen)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
March 07, 2006
DEFEATED
I get discouraged often. The other night, my husband comforted me as I defeatedly moaned about
demographics and jihad. I fear
Iran's nukes. I fear the birthrate. I fear what will happen if we don't put our foot down and say, "It's just a cartoon, dammit." I did mention to my husband that I feel awful pessimistic about the future of the world, so I pity those who honestly believe we live in Bushitler's Oil Junta; they must fret a lot more than I do. My moaning has got nothin' on
these people.
When I get discouraged about the future, I just remind myself that we live in the last second of December 31st. There's so much more to come...
Posted by: Sarah at
10:49 AM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
Post contains 122 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I just want to say that I'm heartened that you, as a republican, believe that the universe is older than ten thousand years. It's nice that conservatives can still surprise me. Gives me hope.
And then South "Coat Hanger" Dakota takes it all away.
Posted by: Will Somerset at March 07, 2006 05:20 PM (eIQfa)
2
P.S.
I read the Wall Street article on demographics. (I had some time, as you must too.) You do realize that its basic premise is that America and the West would cease to be the "Western" if the majority of the populations in these countries were neither white nor Christian? So, what exactly do you call a premise like that? Racist? Xenophobic? Western culture, to me, isn't about race and religion. It's about NOT having to worry about race and religion. It's about seperating that stuff from your daily life and having the oppurtunity to believe in whatever you want and be whatever skin color you want.
The article is completely backwards on what it means to be Western. And, not to mention, really offensive in a wide array of areas. About 8 paragraphs down: "The AIDS pandemic greatly facilitated societal surrender to the gay agenda." Excuse me? You can read that with a straight face? Yeah, those clever fags and their AIDS. Okay, let me breakdown the circular thought process on this:
AIDs epidemic = gay
Gay = tolerance of the "other"
tolerance of the "other" = weakness
weakness = AIDS epidemic
That, right there, is the circular logic of a radical bigot. None of this argument is valid, and is only acceptable in the least if buried under ten thousand words of right-wing propaganda. Do you, Sarah, really believe that tolerance of gay people is destructive to Western society? I refuse to believe you do. I have some hope left. I have some hope that Western society is NOT the same as Taliban society. If not, what the Hell is the point of all this?
You're breaking my heart Sarah. I want Western society to mean something. I want it to be a beacon of hope in a dark world.
Should enemy fighters in Afghanistan be given comfort at a Canadian hospital? Hell no! But your article (which brings this up), is just a big, tangled web of obviously true statements (like this one) mixed with complete non-logical rhetoric. If you agree with A, then you must agree with B, because A=B. But A is valid (the war against the Taliban) and B is not (the need for intolerance in Western society.)
Western is not the opposite of Islamic.
Where they do differ, however, is in the way governments in the West are supposed to be seperable from religious belief, whereas Islamic governments are firmly entrenched in religious dogma. Liberals support the former principal, conservatives seem to support the latter, as long as the religious dogma is Christian.
But get this: an American president could (*gasp*) happen to be Muslim. (Notice that I say 'could,' as in, it legally could happen, not that it would.) If, however, that prospect scares you, it's you who are the fundamentalist who doesn't understand American or Western principals.
All men are created equal. Some are smarter, some are prettier, some are more athletic and some just try harder. But at the moment of creation, we all get a fair shake. Even the ones who aren't Christian. Get it?
Relgious fundamentals will never understand how silly the world looks to an Athiest; how ridiculously silly you all seem, so similar to each other in thought and action, and so desperate to prove that you're different. Athiests (and even moderates) are forced to be meek in a world torn by religious war and the yelling of tyrants who claim to be angels. But liberal Western society is the hill in the flatlands, the light in a new dark age, where we can gather and learn, and fight for the world that was envisioned so long ago by our democratic forefathers.
Posted by: Will Somerset at March 07, 2006 08:42 PM (eIQfa)
3
Will -- Do you know anything about me? Judging from this last tirade, you clearly do not.
Posted by: Sarah at March 08, 2006 03:26 AM (WNBWA)
4
Will I agree with everything you said..I am an atheist and the world to me looks like a violent, sad sad circus..with no viewable end..it just seems to be getting worse by the day..no end in sight. What gets me is that it seems that there are so few atheists..especially in 2006..I just don't..maybe i never will. I feel that this world is hopeless to evolve further and live in peace as long as religion is the central force in people's lives
Posted by: Ashley at March 08, 2006 05:17 AM (HH26Z)
5
What has the WSJ editorial page been saying about Iraq---anyone know? I thought the interesting thing about the column was how it undercut the latest justification for the war. The argument now is that we went to war to bring democracy and individual rights to Iraq, on the assumption that everyone wants and can maintain those and that only the presence of dictators keep some societies from enjoying them. If Muslims living in Western countries can't wait to junk liberal democracy and impose sharia law, though, then what is the point of installing a liberal democracy in Iraq?
Posted by: Pericles at March 08, 2006 09:29 AM (eKf5G)
6
Sarah -- I enjoy your website. I thank you and your husband for your sacrifices and support of our country and its ideals.
Take heart! We will find our way and when we make mistakes we will learn from them. When Bush addressed the UN in 2004, he quoted the great Burmese heroine, Aung San Suu Kyi: "We do not accept the notion that democracy is a Western value."
I too have my fingers crossed about Iraq, but deep down I believe we are doing the right and the best thing in a difficult time.
Posted by: hgwells at March 09, 2006 12:07 AM (kGYWs)
7
That is a very good perspective on time, Sarah -- thanks for the link.
HGWells - I like the quote, will tuck it away for my own use somewhere ;-)
Posted by: Barb at March 09, 2006 01:50 AM (g9qHI)
8
Sarah,
I just got back from some travelling and didn't feel like being online during that time, so I just got a chance to check out the pages I usually surf through (yours included) so sorry for this belated responce, but to answer you question, no, I don't know anything about you. I can only glean certain things from stuff like the articles you link to. Figuring out someone's world view and personality from their blog is sort of like playing 'twenty questions' when the person doing the answering hasn't really thought of anything specific for 'it' to be.
Just so you know, I read your blog because, though I usually surf things like 'crooksandliars' and Atrios, I like getting other perspectives, and I usually find yours to be more balanced than other red staters. My 'tirade' stems from the fact that I've felt more and more hopeless about the direction that social conservatives are taking the country, from intelligent design to banning or withholding birth control, and I'd just hate to think that every fiscal/foreign policy conservative is like that. I didn't think you were, but that article had enough points in it to make me think you are, and that's sad because I'm hoping that when the crazy emotions we're all feeling due to the 'war on terror' start winding down in the years to come, the moderates will be able to form some common ground, some purple politics, and lead the country onward. But if the conservatives insists in bogging down social issues in this "let's try to recreate a 1950s that never really existed except on 'Leave it to Beaver'" I fear that the partisanship will never end. Because liberals can accept the economic and foreign policies of conservatives, but never the ones that take us backwards on a domestic, social level.
Posted by: Will Somerset at March 16, 2006 05:42 PM (eIQfa)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
March 05, 2006
CONTEXT
Why is it always the West's fault for not understanding Islam? Why is Islam itself never to blame? A Muslim college student
wrote:
It does not come as a surprise to me that so many “unbiased” Western news sources carry extremely resentful outlooks regarding Islam.
There is a lack of distinction between orthodox Islamic values and the actions of a minority of Muslims. Western media outlets frequently present a correlation between these two classifications and often interpret Islam out of context. Unfortunately when it comes to reporting Islam, a lack of understanding, quoting sources out of context, and ethnocentric viewpoints seem to be trademarks.
And then in this debate, another Muslim suggested that in order to reform Islam,
we'll have to have a lot of help from rational Muslim minds around the world who buy into the argument that we--you, me, George Bush and Don Rumsfeld (i.e., all of us as Americans)--are not out to get them. ... We could enjoin Western scholars in that process and have them talk through external perception problems with what Islam proposes.
...
If we had an American Muslim FBI director, or the deputy Defense secretary was a Muslim by faith, or one day we had an American Muslim secretary of State, these officeholders would do a world of good by setting an example of how secularism, tolerance and belief can coexist, much the same way Condi Rice and Colin Powell did for black people everywhere in diffusing race as a factor in service to our country.
So the solution to the problem of Islam is that all we Western white folks have to coddle Muslims for decades and have some sort of new affirmative action that gets Muslims into positions of power so that they don't believe we all think they're evil? Give me a break. (It hasn't even worked that well for black people, since many of them hate Rice and Powell anyway.)
When the big news stories broke about Catholic priests molesting children, no Catholic said, "Well, it's not my priest who did that, it's some other priest who misinterpreted scripture." Catholics everywhere were outraged. Why aren't Muslims everywhere outraged? Why is it so easy for them to say "Well, I lead a good life, so it's not my fault if other Muslims misinterpret scripture."
The solution to Islam's problems is not a Muslim Condi Rice. Lord help us if we have to wait that long. The solution is for individual Muslims to be as outraged as individual Catholics were. Mansoor Ijaz says that he has never believed Allah wants him to kill Jews, but unfortunately many Muslims do believe just that. And they outnumber Ijaz. It's not my job as a white Westerner to make sure that Muslims don't feel offended; it's their job to make sure their religion doesn't offend. (And the solution is definitely not just to have Muslim editors making sure nothing in the newspaper offends Muslims. Good lord.)
The common complaint is that Islam is taken out of context. Please tell me what the correct context is then, because I don't know of any other way to interpret "We will wipe Israel off the map."
Posted by: Sarah at
04:52 AM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 531 words, total size 3 kb.
1
Right on! It's good to see you making these important points.
Speaking of "taking things out of context," what's the right context for all those signs held by Mohammedans protesting the Danish cartoons, saying peaceful things like "Behead those who insult Islam," "Europe you will pay, your 9/11 is on it's [sic] way," "Butcher those who mock Islam," "Slay those who insult Islam," "Exterminate those who slander Islam," and "Massacre those who insult Islam"?
(see these signs and more at http://michellemalkin.com/archives/004448.htm)
Posted by: Squidley at March 05, 2006 06:23 AM (2qJKm)
2
I'm sure there are some "intelligent" people out there who could analyze the whole situation, explain it (using their vast knowledge)to the Islamic "insurgents" etc. , and then everybody would understand everybody else and there would be peace in the world...wanna sing Kumbaya now? I'm sure the people carrying those signs and saying things like "wipe Israel off the map" would bow to such superior reasoning.
Posted by: Mary*Ann at March 05, 2006 08:48 AM (ssGwL)
3
Not to go all scientific method on you, but two isolated quotes don't show much. Look, there is introspection and self-questioning going on within Islamic culture, with people there asking how they need to change. Not as much of it as we might want, but that is at least in part due to the fact that Islamic culture doesn't have enough of the intlelectuals that Marry Ann scoffs at, a lack that is partly explained by their history but is also kind of mysterious. The thing is, Sarah, that you seem to be nearly as resistant to the thought that there could be any problem whatsoever with us as you accuse Muslims of being to the thought that there could be any problem with them. Did someone at some university dare to question American policym or your version of American values? Well, then, our universities are darned anti-American. Does George Clooney think that we're less than perfect? Well, then, he hates America, too. Islam needs even more people who are willing to ask hard questions about its own religious and political culture. That doesn't mean that we don't need the ones we have.
Posted by: Pericles at March 05, 2006 09:09 AM (eKf5G)
4
You're right, Pericles, that George Clooney has the right to think whatever he wants, even though I completely disagree with him. But I have the right on my dinky little website to give my opinion as well. Clooney's audience is much wider, but we both have the right to vehemently disagree with each other. Isn't it wonderful? I don't hate dissent per se, as you seem to imply that I do; I'm just exercising my right to grumble for the other side. I'm glad our country affords us this right and that both Clooney and I can say whatever we want. I just wish there were more people with Clooney's airtime saying the things I agree with...
Posted by: Sarah at March 05, 2006 01:07 PM (7aHsI)
5
Sarah-
Okay, that is fair. But I have to press you a little bit more. What I'm not sure that you recognize, at least not consistently, is that people who disagree vehemently with you can still love their country passionately. I question the intelligence and competence of Bush and his ilk, but I have never questioned their patriotism. I completely disagree with their vision about what is best for America, but I don't doubt that they are motivated by a concern for doing what is best. Based on my observations, you don't always give the people with whom you disagree that same kind of credit. Ami I wrong?
Posted by: Pericles at March 05, 2006 01:56 PM (eKf5G)
6
Good Job, Sarah. Git 'em ,Gal. You got my vote for Defender of the Faithful. Keep it up, dearie.
Subsunk
Posted by: Subsunk at March 05, 2006 11:29 PM (qQLWK)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
March 01, 2006
JUST WOW
Back when I was in college, I was naive. I thought that people in the US liked the US. I learned the error of my thinking after 9/11, when I forwarded
Gordon Sinclair's 1973 broadcast to my fellow students and professors. The email backlash shocked my naive self, as students rushed to label me jingoistic and insensitive. One professor pulled me into his office the next day and offered me some wisdom I've never forgotten: "The last place it's OK to be American is in an American university."
I was reminded of that today when I read that Sayed Rahmatullah Hashemi, former ambassador-at-large for the Taliban, is currently a student at Yale. I have many of the same questions as Varifrank, such as "Are there any students at Yale whose mother or father died on 9/11? Any children of NYC fireman at Yale? Any non-Taliban Afghani refugees in Yale? Any of them women?" Mostly I just want to know who had the brilliant idea to invite this jackass to the United States and let "an ex-Taliban envoy with a fourth-grade education and a high-school equivalency" into one of our most lauded universities for the sake of diversity and oneupsmanship.
Why are our universities so durned un-American?
Posted by: Sarah at
05:09 AM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 210 words, total size 1 kb.
1
And why did our State Dept. let this scum into are country?
Idiots are worried about wire taps, port security and the Patriot Act while the enemy studies at Yale.
Unbelievable!
Posted by: tim at March 01, 2006 10:26 AM (QsSL6)
2
Very good question...so sickening but so true. It's almost considered a mark of academic prowess...being anti-American. I'm all for diversity but diversity and fairness. What is fair and just about this? Nothing. Ugh.
Posted by: Nicole at March 01, 2006 01:02 PM (1ECnr)
3
One hypothesis: because universities mass-produce cynicism, and cynicism (beyond a certain level) is not compatible with emotional attachment to anyone or anything, including one's country.
See my post
An Incident at the Movies for more thoughts on this general topic.
Posted by: David Foster at March 01, 2006 08:18 PM (5F0ML)
4
Major universities are no longer dedicated to intellectual pursuits. They are entirely politicized, pseudo-intellectual institutions run by a gang of spineless sophomorons who are afraid of the truth. The sooner the nation learns that they are entirely irrelevant, the better.
The Oracle
www.redskybrothers.com
Posted by: The Oracle at March 02, 2006 01:01 AM (MbkWD)
5
Asking why Yale admitted him (into a non-degree program) seems like a deliberate attempt to deflect attention away from the fact that Bush Administration admitted him onto the country. Shouldn't the first question be why THAT happened? If the Bushies decided that the guy is okay, why is it wrong for a school to let him take some classes?
Posted by: Pericles at March 02, 2006 08:09 AM (eKf5G)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
February 23, 2006
SICK
I read something this morning that I can't really get out of my head. I don't really want to write about it, but I can't stop thinking about it. It's the last paragraph of
this article in Slate:
And that is why as a Muslim American I am enraged by the publication of these cartoons. Not because they offend my prophet or my religion, but because they fly in the face of the tireless efforts of so many civic and religious leaders—both Muslim and non-Muslim—to promote unity and assimilation rather than hatred and discord; because they play into the hands of those who preach extremism; because they are fodder for the clash-of-civilizations mentality that pits East against West. For all of that I blame Jyllands-Posten. We in the West want Muslim leaders to condemn the racial and religious prejudices that are so widespread in the Muslim world. Let us lead by example.
I for one am getting a little tired of having to lead by example. Terrorists saw off any heads they can get their hands on, but Abu Ghraib is the worst thing that's happened in Iraq. Insurgents regularly hide behind civilians, but an American soldier shoots an insurgent under somewhat dubious conditions and he's raked over the coals. I'm sick and tired of being held to a higher standard.
But more than that, there's something so galling about the phrase "they fly in the face of the tireless efforts of so many civic and religious leaders—both Muslim and non-Muslim—to promote unity and assimilation rather than hatred and discord." Come again? Who's promoting unity? Who's trying to assimilate? The whole freaking Western world has bent over backwards apologizing for non-existant flushed Korans and splashed urine and stupid cartoons. Everyone's apologizing and getting fired and being suspended from school papers; can we point some freaking fingers at those who are burning down embassies, for pete's sake? Promoting unity, my foot. The Free Muslims Coalition held an anti-terrorism rally last May, and guess how many people showed up. Maybe fifty. Fifty. My god, it makes me want to cry. How can this writer actually think that Jyllands-Posten is the Muslim community's biggest problem?
Apparently the cartoons prevented Muslims from assimilating. Give me a break. There's a clash of civilizations going on allright, and I think Islam is winning. Schools are changing their art curriculum because drawing people is against Islam. A Muslim girls' basketball team wants to play other teams, which of course means that all men have to be barred from the arena. In Michigan they're blaring the call to prayer over loudspeakers. If this is a fight between East and West, I often feel like the West is losing. The internet has become a disheartening place for me, where I simply dread reading that half of Palestinians support suicide bombers. Or that Israel should be wiped off the map and the Holocaust never happened. And no one in the West stands up to this nonsense. No one says "We're drawing humans in art class because that's what happens in a flippin' art class and you just have to deal with it." No one holds Muslims to the standard that every other religious group is held to:
Some Christians believe they are required to wear particular sorts of clothing. Some Jews and Muslims don't eat pork. They don't claim that their religion requires other people to wear special clothing or avoid eating pork. Tolerance and ecumenism can only do so much. They have nothing to offer a Muslim in Afghanistan who is personally insulted and enraged about an image that appears in a newspaper in Denmark.
I'm sick and tired of the world tiptoeing around Islam. Hitchens is right: we should stand with Denmark and stand up for our values, instead of apologizing because some drawings made people go completely insane. What is wrong with the world?
I just can't take it anymore.
Posted by: Sarah at
06:14 AM
| Comments (9)
| Add Comment
Post contains 655 words, total size 5 kb.
1
Sarah, check out Glen Reinsford's "Age of Tolerance". A current events "Atlas Shrugged".
And I hope you're feeling better about Charlie, dogs like kids get over it and love you no matter.
Posted by: Mary*Ann at February 23, 2006 08:59 AM (ssGwL)
2
'Grok,
Wish I could offer words of encouragement but I'm afraid your totally correct.
I hold on to the idea that the day will come when the "tipping point" is reached (think along the lines of the cartoon bulls*!t) and more and more people realize that the Muslim
majority is our enemy not the minority. (I've come full circle on this myself).
Thank you and your husband for his service to our great country.
Posted by: tim at February 23, 2006 10:25 AM (QsSL6)
3
(sigh) you're wrong. The quote that angers you refers to the tireless efforts of countless Islamic groups that are mainstream and moderate and try to tell the world this, over and over. But that doesn't make the news, and suckers just take the most extreme behaviour that is on the news and spoonfed to them daily and say "that represents all of Islam". The suckers say "spoonfeed me more!" and they are not disappointed.
Try to grok all the Islamic organizations decry terrorism every chance they get.
Posted by question at February
Posted by: question at February 23, 2006 12:53 PM (n17hK)
4
Oh I couldn't agree more! We're dammed if we do, and dammed if we don't (as Americans)...we're expected to help everyone all the time and then turn the other cheek...I'm sick of it, as well. What really makes me nautious are fellow Americans who criticize the actions of our military in some of the aforementioned situations...are they crazy?? Seriously...it's like we're on a school-house point system...+1 for every humanitarian thing you do and -25 for everything that is slightly questionable...the result: always in the negative. Argh.
Posted by: Nicole at February 23, 2006 01:16 PM (1ECnr)
5
If Muslims want to live in "the West" they have to get used to the fact that "freedom of speech" means freedom to criticise.
They have to get used to the fact that people outside of their group are going to criticize their group, it's members, it's leaders, and yes, even it's prophets and icons.
Newsday, a newspaper in Long Island, New York, many years ago printed a cartoon mocking the Pope of the Roman Catholic Church, calling him, essentially, an idiot.
I, and many other Catholics, were outraged, wrote letters to the editor, and cancelled our subscriptions to "that liberal rag".
We didn't riot, we didn't murder, we didn't destroy.
That is how dissent and outrage works in a free country, and any new arrivals must get used to it unconditionally.
Or else get out.
Posted by: Sean at February 23, 2006 02:36 PM (BN/Fu)
6
Hey Nicole how many points should you get per dead civilian in Iraq?
Posted by: question at February 23, 2006 06:16 PM (n17hK)
7
Sarah --
Amen Sister! Well written.
Posted by: MaryIndiana at February 24, 2006 12:16 AM (YwdKL)
8
Isn't being held to a higher standard the inevitable result of our constantly telling everyone that this is the greatest country on the Earth? I for one hope that we always hold ourselves to a higher standard, that we are never satisfied with ourselves just because we're no worse than a Bin Laden or a Saddam Hussein.
I'm a liberal, though; I believe in free speech. I have no tolerance for anyone who responds to a cartoon with violence. There may be a valid complaint about inconsistent application of hate speech laws in Europe, but the real problem are the laws themselves. This is one reason that Sarah was wrong to suggest that liberals might be equally comfortable in other countries recently. We liberals love the First Amendment, and as far as I know only the U.S. has that strong of free speech protection. Both people to the left of me and people to the right of me may want to limit free speech, but I say the more of it the better. The solution to problems caused by speech is more speech.
Posted by: Pericles at February 24, 2006 03:37 PM (eKf5G)
9
As a liberal, I too condemn anyone who would respond to speech with violence. I don't (personally) know of anyone who is holding the West responsible for the behavior of Muslim groups in Europe who are rioting in response to those cartoons. As far as I'm concerned, if you live in Europe or America, you play by the rules. And the rules say religious figures are open targets - that's why I'm allowed to say that Jesus and his diciples seem really gay.
But how can you take the actions of America in Iraq and measure them up do those handful of examples of Muslim non-assimilation in the West and say that America is the victim?
Civil war is breaking out. Iraq is falling apart and thousands and thousands are dead. And a school in St. Paul is offering the OPTION of Islamic-sensitive art classes to muslim kindergartners.
I'm sorry, but how does that add up to America leading by example? How are you sick of something that doesn't even exist?
Posted by: Will Somerset at February 25, 2006 05:19 PM (eIQfa)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
February 15, 2006
BETWEEN WHITE AND BLACK
My college roommate senior year was black. She was a nice enough girl, but we had Culture Clash on more than one occasion. One of the most disheartening things I ever witnessed was her relationship with an African student. Not an African-American, an actual African. This guy was one of the most genuine and friendly people I've ever met, and smart too. He and my husband had many business and economics classes together, and he was active in speech/debate. He also belonged to a fraternity. Real nice guy. But apparently he wasn't Black Enough. I had to watch my roommate try to turn him into a thug so he wouldn't be an outcast in the campus black community anymore. She said flat-out that black people didn't really like him and he needed to change his behavior. She "corrected" his speech, advised him to quit his white fraternity and join the black one, and generally nagged the guy about not being truly black. It was a depressing thing to watch. Luckily they eventually broke up, and I hope this guy has done better for himself. He had the potential to be successful, as long as all the "advice" he got didn't sink in.
(This memory prompted by LaShawn Barber.)
Posted by: Sarah at
11:56 AM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
Post contains 216 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Typical stuff, actually. I'm labeled a sell-out in my school because I happen to believe that the "tyranny of the minority" definitely applies on campus, racially and otherwise.
Oh and yeah, I'm Asian (Filipino-American to be exact). I think the correct term is a "twinkie": yellow on the outside and white on the inside. Or some also use banana, depending if the accusing party is also a vegan anarchist.
Posted by: John at February 15, 2006 03:05 PM (enIP4)
2
A co-worker and I were just discussing this very topic. Since both of us are of mixed heritage, we have been accused of not being "Black enough" or "Acting white". It's just pathetic.
I personally have "issues" with being called African-American. I can trace my Fathers side back to my Great Grandparents and they were in Georgia. On my Mothers side I can trace back to my Grandparents, they immigrated from Poland to Germany before the war.
Can someone please tell me how that makes me "African-American"?
Posted by: Vonn at February 15, 2006 05:52 PM (dEgRi)
3
I don't mind the term African-American. I've been called far worse. Why is there such a push for some verbal, superficial acceptance when history and society tells us discrimination is still rampant?
--Cobra
Posted by: Cobra at February 15, 2006 07:23 PM (Ffvoi)
4
Growing up I knew two black kids who were twins. I grew up in an Asain and Hispanic community. When I hit college, I had more interactions but was still very unknowledgable about black culture. All this time though I was told, time and time again to call blacks African-Americans. (I grew up in northern CA).
It wasn't until I got married moved around and got to spend real time making friends with all sorts of people that I learned that there are many that do or don't like a particular term to describe ethnecitity.
A couple of coworkers giggled the first time I called a woman African-American. So I pretty much refrain from using any term until I get to know the person better. Both of my officemates use Black, so do I when I am with them. An older coworker down the hall prefers African-American. I just try to accomodate to what they are used to if I can.
It is too bad that she felt she had to change the person istead of him being allowed to be who he was. I know two Sgts that are from different African Nations, they are great people. They are quiet but when they do speak they have some very interesting and well thought things to say.
I hope he found out who he was and stuck with it.
HH6
Posted by: Household6 at February 16, 2006 03:13 AM (Gj0PV)
5
Sigh. I unfortunately can relate to the African. I actually HEARD a girl in my high school say, just loud enough so I could hear, that I used to be cool last year when I was black. WTF? Then, I was so confused. Now, I realize that it was just an avenue to piss me off. She wouldn't have liked me whether I was "black" or not.
As I heard Henry Louis Gates (head of African American Studies at Harvard) say on the Today Show, Martin Luther King Jr. would roll over in his grave to see that black kids are pressured to be thugs, speak poorly and drop out of school to play sports - by their own people. It's an insult to the civil rights movement to define being black as being ghetto. If being highly educated and dressing appropriately means I'm white what is that saying about what it means to be black? And anyway I'm half black. NO one picked up on the fact that I'm half Latino too...
Ok, off my soapbox
Posted by: monique at February 16, 2006 03:51 PM (AK5UJ)
Posted by: Vonn at February 16, 2006 06:03 PM (dEgRi)
7
Did I mention the comment from that girl was probably twelve years ago? It take's time to heal those feelings unfortunately...
Posted by: Monique at February 16, 2006 06:30 PM (AK5UJ)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 04, 2006
READY
Well, we finally crossed over the '05-'06 barrier, and now we're less than five months from moving back to the US. Longtime readers will know how we've longed to see this day on the horizon. You know what I'm ready for?
I'm ready to have one vet, one doctor, one optometrist, and one car mechanic, all of whom speak English. Monday I had to go to a German clinic and buy new glasses, all in German. I speak terrible German, but the glasses guy said I speak it better than anyone else he's worked with. That's pathetic. I'm tired of feeling anxious about not knowing words like timing belt and prolonged diarrhea (which the dog had, not me). I'm sick of the sinking feeling in my stomach when I realize I have to go Out Into Germany to take care of business. And I'd really rather get itemized receipts, instead of having the vet hem and haw after he's done with Charlie and go, "Mmm...41 Euro?"
I'm ready to buy a variety of groceries and beauty products. Gruyere cheese? Can't get it at the commissary. Nor can we get tamari, ground poultry, or chipotle chilis. My neighbor, who happens to be the best dentist in the world, suggested I use ACT mouthwash. I bought one bottle and then waited three months for the PX to restock. Finally I gave up and bought it online. Do you know how hard my mom laughed when she heard I had bought seven bottles of mouthwash online? But we can't get it here. They've also been out of Woolite carpet spray for pet stains since July. Sigh.
I'm ready to go to a freaking Taco Bell.
I'm just ready for peace of mind. I'm ready to know that I can buy or do anything I need to. Or I can at least call and ask for information. (Ahh, to make a local call for free -- what a treat.) I'll be able to take care of myself, instead of begging German acquaintences to help me read my mail and call the phone company for me (on the English Hotline, where no one speaks English.)
I'm ready to go home.
Posted by: Sarah at
05:05 AM
| Comments (10)
| Add Comment
Post contains 367 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Amen, sister!
I remember a few weeks ago during our knitting club, I called Mark to ask if he wanted to go anywhere when I got home. He started asking me about something totally unrelated, and I said, "Babe, I gotta go...This is Sarah's nickel." How lame! It's sad when you have to pay to talk to someone within walking (well, kind-of) distance!
I'm ready to go home too.
Posted by: Erin at January 04, 2006 06:23 AM (pPQK6)
2
5 months? I'm going to miss you SO much!!!
Posted by: The Girl at January 04, 2006 07:00 AM (boUZW)
3
Sarah,
I agree with everything you said. It seems that as the days get nearer, I get more and more anxious to go "home". I can't wait to be within a 3 hour flight for emergencies instead of thinking that if something happened, it would be a whole day to get the states.
We have no idea what Jason is going to do as far as DEA or School but I don't even care. I told him that the first morning we are back, I want to go out for BREAKFAST! I want a waffle, bacon, and cheap, gross coffee!
Posted by: Stephanie at January 04, 2006 07:45 AM (MOoZ+)
4
Remember the grass is always greener on the other side . . . I know how much you love these type of sayings! I know you are more than ready to be back in the US of A . . . people always laughed at me for ordering just about anything from the internet . . . I still find myself doing it even though I live in the US! I think I might go eat Taco Bell for lunch in your honor!
Posted by: Heidi at January 04, 2006 11:45 AM (E0L31)
5
I can't wait for you to get back either. I do miss Germany but love being able to ask for help in English. Heck, even the sales-people will ask you if you need any help instead of just staring at you until you leave the store! Oh and don't forget, if you pass your exit on the highway....you can actually turn around before you get to France....HAHAHA!
Any idea where the Army will tak you next?
Posted by: Angie at January 04, 2006 12:46 PM (SA3c9)
6
Yes...I remember! I'm with Heidi though...the grass really is greener, although I totally sympathize with your "american" desires

I remember feeling the same way. I'm happy to have the material world at my fingertips now, but I do miss the close-knit community I knew in Germany. Of course, it's always about the people, right? Hey...what ever happened to that Taco Bell in graf??
Posted by: Nicole at January 04, 2006 01:20 PM (KJBDI)
7
I couldn't wait to leave Germany either, but no that I am gone there are things I miss.
Cozy, cold Christkindl markets, Gluhwein, bratwurst, walking downtown (any city) and window shopping or sipping capuccino.....and the best thing....Driving through the countryside in spring and enjoying the colors and flowers. (Minus getting stuck behind the poo truck).
Let us know where you end up.
Posted by: Vonn at January 04, 2006 03:29 PM (dEgRi)
8
My son says Germany is a nice place to visit, but he's tired of living there (yeah even after nearly a year in the Stan, he's not looking forward to returning to Germany). Since he's told me about 3 or 4 different things he's "going to do" when he gets done with his deployment - I've decided to wait until he gets to a final destination and says - "this is where I'll be for the next ___ amount of time". *grin*
I hope you end up somewhere excellent in the States and that you can find the great people you're looking for. In some cases it may take some searching... for instance doctors who speak English (this can be problematical). Good Luck!
Posted by: Teresa at January 04, 2006 04:12 PM (FZwDL)
9
I think it would be really neat if you got stationed at Fort Huachuca in Sierra Vista,Arizona. I'm about 30 miles from there in little Bisbee, which has no stores(except art galleries and gift shops for the tourists) and I'm over in Sierra Vista all the time. On Sundays you see all the kids, male and female, from basic, walking all over town with their knapsacks and cell phones. They fill up the food court at the Mall, which is a good 7 or 8 miles from the post. They're not allowed to ride in private vehicles, sometimes you see a shuttle van unloading a bunch of them at Walmart. There's a Starbucks in the Safeway and if I have enough money on me, I'll pay for their coffees. They all giggle when I thank them for their service. I look at those baby faces and I think some of them will be in Iraq soon, and they're all in my prayers. I think you and your husband are terrific, Sarah.
Posted by: Maggie45 at January 05, 2006 01:44 AM (YYsdS)
10
Sarah - I've never been out of New Jersey (outside America actually) but I almost moved to Kansas once. The two things that stopped me were tornadoes and lack of anything being open after 9pm. When you get HOME to America...come up towards NYC and I'll buy you any fast food or take you to any all-night diner you wish. Get home safe!
Posted by: Kathleen A at January 05, 2006 07:26 AM (7qm8p)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
December 27, 2005
LAZY?
Pericles thinks I'm being unfair in lumping together regular anti-OIF Democrats with the likes of Michael Moore and Cindy Sheehan. I guess he might have more of a point if Michael Moore hadn't
sat in the VIP box with Jimmy Carter at the Democratic National Convention. Michael Moore is embraced by Democrat leaders, as
Judicious Asininity points out:
DNC Chairman Terry McCauliffe praised Michael Moore's Fahrenheit 9/11, as this article by NRO's Byron York makes clear. And McCauliffe wasn't the only ranking Democrat to praise the movie:
In addition to McAuliffe, other Democrats at the Washington screening included Senate Minority Leader Tom Daschle, Iowa Sen. Tom Harkin, Montana Sen. Max Baucus, South Carolina Sen. Ernest Hollings, Michigan Sen. Debbie Stabenow, Florida Sen. Bill Nelson, New York Rep. Charles Rangel, Washington Rep. Jim McDermott, and others. Harkin told the Associated Press that all Americans should see the film. "It's important for the American people to understand what has gone on before, what led us to this point, and to see it sort of in this unvarnished presentation by Michael Moore."
Michael Moore isn't nearly as fringe as Pericles apparently would like him to be. Pericles is right that Cindy Sheehan hasn't won the hearts and minds of big-name Democrats, but small-fry Democrats love her and say things like:
Fortunately, the grassroots of the Democratic Party do not agree with Kerry and Clinton. They want the troops out of Iraq. Many claim that this rift between the party grassroots and the D.C. Democrats is a fundamental identity crisis. They see the party as having no legitimate direction. No heart. No soul. They are right.
If Democratic politicians had a soul, they'd be standing shoulder to shoulder with Sheehan's supporters at candlelight vigils across the country. But that won't be happening anytime soon. The Democrats in D.C. aren't even sure Sheehan's actions are justified. They aren't even sure that her son died for an unjust cause.
The futility of the Democrats in Washington grows graver by the day.
They want an overthrow of their party and a major shift to the left. And I don't think it's "intellectually lazy", Pericles, for me to notice this. When John Kerry links to Daily Kos, it indicates acceptance of the "loony left".
Pericles says that "it makes it much easier for you to defend the war if you can depict everyone who opposed it as coming from the looney left", but I know that's not true. Many of my relatives (both my side and my husband's) don't support OIF. Many military wives I know don't support it either. Those people don't have a political reason for their feelings; they simply don't want people they love to have to die for someone else's country. I can get my mind around that feeling, even if I don't share it. They're a similar type of anti-war to Cindy Sheehan, to be honest, though I've never heard any of my relatives blame President Bush. They simply don't want there to be a war.
But people like Murtha and Pelosi are not in this category. They oppose this war on political grounds, and They. Blame. Bush. Just like Cindy Sheehan does. Just like Michael Moore does. Just like Pericles does, I think. Bush hatred has drawn all these people together, and they're all under the Democrats' tent, like it or not.
Posted by: Sarah at
06:25 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 562 words, total size 4 kb.
1
Michael Moore blew the lid off of the Cheney-Bush Oil Junta in the documentary Fahrenheit 911.
The real question is not why Democrats would allow themselves to be lumped together with such a radical truth-teller, but why so many people would be lumped together with the rich exploiters, racists, and religious fundamentalists that is the GOPOC: The Grand Old Party of Criminals.
Posted by: IS LED BY NONE at December 27, 2005 11:03 AM (zXPOg)
2
Good question. I guess for me it is the betrayel of the working class values espoused by the Democrats while I was growing up in favor of more socialist values. They became less representative of what I and other blue-collared workers believed in and more about what the enemies I enlisted to fight believe in.
Considering how appreciative the party has become of radical anti-American leftists and how unsupportive they have been of working class people, it's no wonder so many of us are defecting to the Republican party. I mean unemployed, but secure in the knowledge that I had strong union protection when the company stayed afloat, compared to no union protection and more jobs is a question with an obvious answer.
Another question, one that neither parties addresses adequately but the Democrat party is against, is how to adress rampant illegal immigration that deflates blue-collar wages and takes jobs away from blue-collar workers. Certainly picking cabbage is not among them, but dry-walling, roofing, welding, carpentry, and construction labor are. I myself have personally seen illegal immigrants at work at welding positions that I would have done. I know carpenters and other construction workers that have been forced to move because of the glut in housing construction illegal hiring practices. Let's see Michael Moore address that with the same zeal as Roger & Me, and TV Nation (back when I was a fan).
Another good question, though one the Democrats have always failed to pose, is why do so many (an overwhelming majority) of those who choose to give up so much of their life (including that life itself) and choose to give up some freedoms that most take for granted choose to be Republican rather than Democrat. Beyond ad hominen attacks about their intellectual capacity and morality, it is a question the Democrat party has failed to ask themselves and appears to have no interest in.
Rambling and talking bubbles now, turns out that I also am now boiling mad.
Kalroy
Posted by: Kalroy at December 27, 2005 07:40 PM (AwOS7)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
November 21, 2005
SO SAD
One of my favorite bloggers disappears and resurfaces so often I can barely keep up with him. His blog-restarting ritual reminds me of the way the X-man Nightcrawler bamfs into thin air. Since this blogger teleports himself around the blogosphere and pops up where he's least expected, I can no longer keep up with the name of his blog or the name he's using for himself. From here on out, I'm calling him
Bamf. (Deal with it, dude.)
Bamf normally deals in humor alone, so I was surprised to find one of the saddest articles I've read in a long time: the excavation of priceless tokens found at a concentration camp:
A child's ring. Twisted reading glasses. A few gold coins: scraps of personal dignity, hurriedly buried in a last act of defiance to keep them from falling into Nazi hands. Israeli archaeologists helped by survivors are writing a new chapter in the terrible history of the German death camp at Majdanek, Poland, by excavating grounds long thought to be empty.
Their findings show how the doomed Jews furiously dug into the grassy ground with their hands to bury what personal possessions they had with them before they were murdered in the camp's gas chambers.
Posted by: Sarah at
05:14 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 209 words, total size 1 kb.
November 08, 2005
NUGENT
My friend Erin was outraged when she saw the way Ted Nugent was treated on the Donny Deutsch show. (She's at that point in blogging when the media is really
ticking her off.) She told me all about it, so when I clicked over to the rerun of the episode last night, I was intrigued.
I ended up so impressed with the way Nugent defended his positions, and so perturbed at the way Deutsch twisted his words around. As one blogger summarized the show:
Donny Deutsch' interview yesterday with "conservative-libertarian" rockstar Ted Nugent and wife was absolutely priceless. There's no transcript of it online but if I find it I will link it. The bottom line: the Nugents enjoyed being thrown the kind of questions one can expect from a mainstream Manhattan media star who doesn't like gun ownership and "supports the war effor in Iraq, but ...". The Nugents, with a smile on their face, cruised comfortably through the interview while Deutsch was getting visibly irritated as he lost ground as the chat went on.
What absolutely killed me about the interview was Deutsch's condescending smirk the whole time. After every commercial break, he re-introduced the segment as an interview with "ultra-conservative" Ted Nugent. (As if he'd ever introduce someone like Ted Kennedy as ultra-liberal.) And since I agreed with nearly every thing that Ted Nugent said, I found myself wondering if I too am an ultra-conservative. Of course, Donny Deutsch thinks he's completely moderate and middle-of-the-road, even though he was droning on and on about animal rights, gun control, and evil Fox news, the Rocky Marciano for every bias-blind liberal. You could just hear Deutsch's voice dripping with sarcasm, since he obviously thought that the Nugents live in a Fantasy World of human-centric personal responsibility. He snidely asked Mrs. Nugent if "the family who stays on the Right stays together?", to which she cheerfully and good-sportedly replied yes. He also went into a long spiel about how rockers are typically into sex, drugs, and liberal agendas and then asked Ted Nugent how he managed to end up on the "to put it nicely, far right side?" Nugent responded immediately with the most wonderful comeback: "Dicipline."
Nugent had some wonderful quotes. When Deutsch was droning about the poor baby Bambis that Nugent hunts, he asked Nugent if he thinks that animals have any rights at all. Nugent said that "rights are uniquely human", that we should treat animals humanely and with respect, but that they certainly don't have rights. When Deutsch started babbling about mink coats, Nugent laughed and said, "A leather jacket is a fur coat with a haircut."
Naturally, Donny Deutsch thinks Iraq was the wrong war at the wrong time. Nugent disagreed, citing the flypaper strategy of Iraq -- which he called "baiting the monster" -- and said that the Bush administration should've better articulated this strategy for the public. Deutsch just waved him off with a hand, completely dismissing what he'd said as if he'd not even listened. No fakey-fake "hmm, interesting theory" that talk show hosts normally give, just eye rolling and sighs.
On the topic of personal responsibility, the Nugents started talking about health. The Nugents said that our country has real problems with obesity and smoking, so "how can you demand health care when you don't care for your health?" When Ted Nugent said that lifelong smokers and Krispy Kreme eaters can't just expect the American government to foot their medical bills, Donny Deutsch looked at him like he had a foot growing out of his head. On the topic of gun control, Deutsch kept twisting Nugent's words, as if Nugent wants every fender bender to end in a hail of bullets. Another blogger lays out the ridiculous statistics that Deutsch threw at Nugent, and when Nugent rejected them, Deutsch looked at him with those Fantasy Land Eyes again. When Deutsch asked if the Nugents believe guns should have trigger locks to protect children, Nugent responded by saying that he taught his son that "the trigger lock is in your spirit and mind." That's the most important thing you can teach your child about gun safety, but Deutsch just looked at the Nugents like they were the worst parents in the world.
Incidentally, when the subject of parenting did come up, and when Nugent said that the Osbornes are terrible parents and that Sharon Osborne should be "slapped silly" for the way she lets her children walk all over her, Deutsch had a field day. He started lecturing Nugent on beating women, even though he clearly was using "slapped silly" in its figurative and colloquial sense. And that's when the most important part of the segment happened, in my opinion. Donny Deutsch said something -- and I wish I had been fast enough to write it down verbatim -- about how Ted Nugent has some kooky ideas about gun control, so he wouldn't put it past him to be a wife beater too. That's the scary part. Liberal Donny Deutsch was so out of his element talking to a conservative that he didn't even know what it means to be conservative. He equates Nugent's lifestyle of hunting and self-reliance with some backwards, backwoods notions of male dominance and aggression. Conservative apparently means caveman to Deutsch. By saying that he wouldn't be surprised if Nugent walked up and slapped Sharon Osborne, he laid out a perfect example of how liberal Hollywood types really don't know anything about middle America.
I'm glad I watched the show. Ted Nugent was articulate and entertaining, and Donny Deutsch came off as a huge pansy. I know why Erin got mad at the show, but I wouldn't have missed it for the world.
UPDATE:
Cali, you can watch it here, though the buffering is acting funny for me.
Posted by: Sarah at
07:43 AM
| Comments (9)
| Add Comment
Post contains 972 words, total size 6 kb.
1
Ted Rocks! I pray he runs for Governor of Michigan. If he did, folks outside of Wayne County would actually go and vote, and he would beat Jennifer Grandholm in a LANDSLIDE!
C'mon Ted! Take Michigan Back!
(just my humble opinion of course ;o))
Posted by: MargeinMI at November 08, 2005 08:24 AM (GzkdL)
2
Wow...you made my mouth water just reading that...I have got to watch that! Thanks for the tip.
Posted by: CaliValleyGirl at November 08, 2005 08:42 AM (tpck+)
3
Sniff...how come it's not available online? Not fair...
Posted by: CaliValleyGirl at November 08, 2005 08:46 AM (tpck+)
4
Very intersting . . . will have to watch the show when work ends. The Nugents' are very big supporters of the military here at Fort Hood too. They have some land in the area so visit often.
Posted by: H. Sims at November 08, 2005 12:45 PM (yuTUu)
5
I just checked out Keith Olbermann on MSNBC spout the radical lefty anti-war gospel. How are media pundits being chosen anyway?
Posted by: Eric at November 08, 2005 06:44 PM (dkUKh)
6
I am not such a huge fan on the Nuge, and he only appeals to a certain type of Conservative (I guess the South-Park Conservative). He was a coward and a draft dodger in the 60s, he had a child out of wedlock and only helped support the child when he was dragged into court, and his outspoken political views verge on the crass, like his "What's a feminist anyways? A fat pig who doesn't get it often enough?" That's tasteless and extremist.
I also wish wish the 'flypaper' theory would go away. Think about it, we are justifying invading another country so that the terrorists will invaqde it and we can fight them there. I'm sure that the Iraqis we were promising liberation love that bait-and-switch - "oh you were expecting freedom and democracy, well that will come along eventually, for now you get Al-Qaida bombings." If Iraq had a terrorist problem before the invasion it would be one thing, but they had virtually no terrorists.
Posted by: Mr. Silly at November 08, 2005 07:56 PM (1+6tL)
7
The flypaper strategy is merely taking advantage of the terrorist's desires to destroy attempts at creating a democracy in Iraq. An opportunity, in other words: if they're going to stream in and put themselves in positions where our soldiers can kill them, then fine. When they stop, we can continue the business of making Iraq into a free nation with fewer interruptions.
I don't recall the flypaper strategy ever appearing in the list of justifications for going into Iraq. Establishing a democratic government was, even if those opposed to it like to pretend it wasn't.
Posted by: Patrick Chester at November 08, 2005 10:21 PM (MKaa5)
8
Thanks! I have buffering probs too...but it was great...you know the whole "slaped silly" thing reminded me of when I get into a discussion with a German, and then they start correcting my German, instead of paying attention to what I am saying, along the lines of: huh? What do you mean? Well, that's not how you say it...you say this...because what you just said was that...yeah, and blah blah blah..." Enough for me to just say: yeah, argue my German, and not my points...that's the way.
Posted by: CaliValleyGirl at November 09, 2005 05:48 AM (h/JEl)
9
Sarah,
Well said...You elaborated on everything I was already thinking.
Posted by: Erin at November 09, 2005 07:17 AM (brQHV)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
November 06, 2005
FRANCE
Through Right Wing News, I found a
Hugh Hewitt interview of Mark Steyn on the riots in France. A few lines really brought back memories:
I went to one of these suburbs that's currently ablaze three years ago. And what was interesting to me is I had to bribe a taxi driver a considerable amount of money just to take me out there. They're miserable places. But what was interesting to me is that after that, I then flew on to the Middle East, and I was in Yemen, and a couple of other places. And what was interesting to me was that I found more menace in the suburbs of Paris than I did in some pretty scary places in the Middle East.
...
They're places where people who are not Muslim feel very ill at ease. They're places where the writ of the French state does not run. The police don't police there. They basically figure if you go there, you're on your own. You're taking your own chances there. I mean, I don't think Americans understand quite the degree of alienation of some of these groups. You know, there's a French cabinet minister whose title is the minister for social cohesion.
I lived in Angers, France, from 1998-1999. Angers has a population of about 150,000, and I lived right on the edge between the city of Angers and one of these Muslim suburbs. And what I experienced as much as French culture was French-Arab culture.
When I went to get my student train discount, the woman at the counter asked me where I lived. The horrified look on her face should've been my first warning, but it wasn't. The real warning came three weeks into my stay as I was walking home alone in the rain at night. A man on a motorbike drove up on the sidewalk and trapped me between a van and the wall. He started speaking too quietly, and as I strained to hear what he was saying, he grabbed my breasts. I twisted his arm around and took off running. Luckily, I ran into the middle of the street in front of an oncoming car, and the man in the car yelled at the motorbike guy while I escaped. Thus began a year of avoiding the people in my neighborhood.
When we rode the bus, people threw trash at us. We witnessed fights when Arab teens tried to pick up girls. One Brit I knew had a knife put to his throat on a bus. The bus drivers let the Arabs smoke on the bus because if they gave them some concessions, they might be spared real trouble.
When we went to the neighborhood grocery store, young boys (around 12 yrs old) threatened to kill us. One evening while I was on the pay phone, some teens knocked on the glass and said, "Tell your boyfriend that when you get off the phone, we're gonna rape you."
I know that a lot of my problems with France were actually problems with French Arabs. But I lived about half a mile from a police station, and not once did I see a police car check out the area. A man tried to grab me on the street a stone's throw from a police station, which says something about how scared these punks are of the authorities.
France has major problems that have been festering for years. As I watched the footage of these Arabs throwing stones at the public bus, I was not surprised. I'm just surpised it didn't happen sooner.
You know, we kept hearing all this stuff ever since September 11th, you know, the Muslim street is going to explode in anger. Well, it finally did, and it was in Paris, not in the Middle East.
Read all of Steyn's interview, and be very afraid for France.
Posted by: Sarah at
04:42 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 648 words, total size 4 kb.
1
When I read that, I thought of you and wondered what you would say!
How did you ever end up in such a G**-forsaken place?
Posted by: David Boxenhorn at November 06, 2005 09:09 AM (UDpE5)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
October 26, 2005
SAD JOKE
I'm sick and tired of people picking on Condoleezza Rice for not being black enough.
Powerline cuts to the core of a very depressing and demeaning op-ed about how Rice just doesn't get it. According to Eugene Robinson, she was too busy playing the piano to understand racism, and she lives in this Fantasy World where people are judged by the content of their character instead of the color of their skin, which apparently is a bad thing.
Last night I caught an episode of The Chappelle Show that I'd never seen before. It included a "race draft", a humorous take on sports drafts where different races chose multi-racial people to belong to their group. (For example, Tiger Woods was drafted by the black race, defining him once and for all as black.) When the white group came to the podium, they drafted Colin Powell. The black race said they'd negotiate a trade: they'd throw in Condoleezza if they could have Eminem.
I know it's just a joke, but it's a shame there's an element of truth to it. It's sad commentary that the black race would rather embrace Eminem than Rice and Powell, two of the most educated and powerful people on the planet.
Posted by: Sarah at
05:26 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 209 words, total size 1 kb.
1
It's a sad day indeed when an American woman in a position of power is picked at because she's not black enough. They could just pick on her for going against the NAFTA agreement with her policies and ideas, for example.
Posted by: Julie at October 26, 2005 11:26 AM (w7n+v)
2
Sounds like a good trade to me, we get Condi & they can have Eminem !!!
Posted by: DougFunnie at October 26, 2005 01:16 PM (WT0qS)
3
Most young white people prefer Eminem too, let's remember. I don't have much use for him, but I did download Mosh from iTunes.
Posted by: Pericles at October 27, 2005 07:49 AM (EpPuP)
4
I agree, it is sad that many young black Americans don't take more interest in politics and think that Condi and Colin are sell-outs. I for one do not agree with that at all. I'd claim them both any day....
Of course, I don't think I'm considered young anymore...much less black, per Dave Chapelle's voting game. LOL!
Posted by: Vonn at October 31, 2005 05:48 PM (dEgRi)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
October 22, 2005
THE NEED
Amritas writes about how the need for a foreign language can be an indicator of success (I'm really oversimplifying
his post here; it's much more interesting in its entirety). One of my friends emailed me last week. We haven't talked in a while, which became obvious to me when she said, "I imagine your German's probably awesome by now!"
Before I moved here, I couldn't understand how people could be stationed in Germany or Korea and come home not speaking the language. Now I completely understand this. Until you see how a military community operates, it's hard to really imagine it. My Swedish friend bought me a German paperback book as a gift when she came to visit two years ago. At the end of her weekend here, she apologized for giving me the book, saying that she didn't realize how American my life still was, even though I was smack dab in the middle of Europe.
We speak only English all day long. We spend dollars at our stores, where we can buy 110-volt appliances and Region 1 DVDs. My husband and I don't have any German friends except for a few wives, most of whom speak English quite well and sit around moaning about how they'd rather be in Kentucky where they could go to Walmart at 10 PM. We don't need to speak German.
That said, we try to speak it whenever we're out on the town. We do just fine with our restaurant and department store vocabulary. Sometimes we get the Rolled Eye Treatment from German shopkeepers who'd rather conduct business in English anyway, like last weekend when I started giving someone my address in German and she looked at me like I was speaking Chinese. I sighed and repeated the exact same thing in English, at which point she finally wrote it down. The Germans in our area don't want us to speak German, so it's an uphill battle with the girl in the train station who begged, "Can you please just speak English so this will go faster?" when I tried to purchase a train ticket in German.
We're perfectly capable of learning German. I learned French and Swedish just fine, and my husband taught himself basic Arabic, for pete's sake. But the motivation just isn't there, because the reward for speaking German on the economy is rolled eyes and groans. So why bother?
(This is not to excuse those people who rave on and on about how much they loooove living in Europe but don't even bother to learn how to order food from a menu. I hate when we run into those types when we're out on the town. If you want to homestead here permanently and be a Squatter after you retire, then learn freaking German, you boors.)
Posted by: Sarah at
06:35 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 471 words, total size 3 kb.
1
It's like that in Korea, too. There are fewer English speakers the farther you get from post, but if you're not the adventurous type, you can get by with just English. I did two tours, a rough total of 2 years, in Korea and I learned a miniscule amount of han-gul. I didn't try hard to learn Korean, but I also didn't try hard not to learn Korean. There just wasn't a compelling reason to learn the language. A soldier can easily spend his year in a highly Americanized environment - think of a Chinese immigrant who lives his entire life in a Chinatown, except all his public services and employment are provided in Chinese, too. And heck, when this immigrant travels away from Chinatown, he even takes an independently functional mini-Chinatown with him.
Tactically speaking, I thought the GIs in Korea should have been strongly encouraged and facilitated by Command to pick up a basic level of Korean and local familiarization. Even in peace-time and 50-plus years of USFK, it's not always easy to operate outside the gates. A troop can get lost and isolated in a hurry, and that's a scary feeling. If we went to war with nK, I could see American ops breaking down quickly at the tactical level with troops not knowing the language, area and people and trying to operate in a chaotic foreign environment.
Posted by: Eric Chen at October 24, 2005 07:04 PM (3Nllw)
2
I hate it when they start speaking in English on you. I just ignore them and keep speaking German. I took the time to start to learn the language so I am going to use it damn it! I am not perfect at it but at least I try. I work with Germans so I am exposed more to the language and if you want to know if you are being talked about you have to learn some. ;-)
It actually worked well when I was in Czech with a friend and her mom. It was the only mutual language the hotel staff and I knew.
HH6
Posted by: Household6 at October 26, 2005 05:33 AM (T+Tkq)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
October 18, 2005
UN
OK, here's what I don't get. The top google hits for a search on Mugabe include the phrases "Zimbabwe strongman", "descent into dictatorship", "people dying in Zimbabwe", and "Mugabe's terror campaign". He's banned from entering the EU, except for when he's invited by the UN, like he was Monday for the 60th anniversary of the UN's Food and Agriculture Organization. So Mugabe, dictator of a country where "an estimated 3.8 million people" are starving, has
this to say in front of the UN (via LGF):
Mr Mugabe used his speech to lambast President Bush and UK Prime Minister Tony Blair, whose governments have been among his severest critics.
"Must we allow these men, the two unholy men of our millennium, who in the same way as Hitler and Mussolini formed [an] unholy alliance, form an alliance to attack an innocent country?" asked Mr Mugabe, apparently referring to Iraq.
"The voice of Mr Bush and the voice of Mr Blair can't decide who shall rule in Zimbabwe, who shall rule in Africa, who shall rule in Asia, who shall rule in Venezuela, who shall rule in Iran, who shall rule in Iraq," he said.
And what did the UN do after he went on this tirade that had nothing to do with feeding the hungry?
Some delegates to the Rome meeting applauded Mr Mugabe's condemnation of the Western leaders on several occasions during his speech and then at the end.
So a real life dictator goes to the UN to call Bush and Blair dictators? And people clap? The UN is such a joke.
Hey, Mugabe. Maybe you'd better look at your own tactics before you start pointing dictator fingers at others. I'd say "using violence and murder as an electoral strategy" is a far cry from Bush and Blair. But hey, you seem to fit in fine with the Oil For Food crowd.
Please, can we just end this charade that is the UN?
Posted by: Sarah at
04:00 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 325 words, total size 2 kb.
1
WTF happened to those guys to skew their perspective so much? I am so sick of them catering to total sh*ts...I mean, compared to the PM of Italy, Bush is a pussycat. I mean, that guy just keeps on changing laws to avoid getting indicted, um, changed a law about needing certain majorities for decisions...um, owns a media concern so he can make his own publicity. And then, let's see...then there is Chirac, or Jacques Iraq, as the Iraqis called him under Saddam. Oh, and he extended an invite to Mugabe last time. And those guys think they can criticize Bush and Blair...seeing the splinter in someone else's eye, but not noticing the log in your own? I think the rest of the world can be thankful that those guys aren't presiding over America or England.
The UN is a total farce.
Posted by: CaliValleyGirl at October 18, 2005 05:50 AM (7vNDT)
2
hey sarah finaaly we agree on something.those clowns in midtown are looking for a paycheck and a night out on the upper east side.in all fairness their humanitarian efforts and their abilitily to co-ordinate"some" elections they have done fairly well.their "peacekeeping missions" are a total joke.these dudes couldn't break up a bar fight in the ghetto much less lead a country back to stability.just look at east timor for openers.
Posted by: tommy at October 18, 2005 08:39 AM (NMK3S)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
172kb generated in CPU 0.1093, elapsed 0.2127 seconds.
64 queries taking 0.1846 seconds, 317 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.