January 20, 2005


Seems John Earl Haynes has been reading the same kind of one-sided crap I have:

Haynes: Jamie: It is still early to judge what impact In Denial will have. Thus far the only reviews have been in conservatively-oriented journals of opinion. There have been none in liberal and left journals and no academic reviews.

Debate in the academic world on this issue is limited. Anyone whose knowledge of the historical literature was based on a reading of articles published in the Journal of American History and the American Historical Review, the two leading journals in the field, would believe that there was nothing to debate. Not a single article published in the Journal of American History and the American Historical Review in the last thirty years has taken a critical stance regarding the American Communist movement or a benign view of domestic anticommunism. In the same thirty-year period dozens of articles in these journals have taken a reverse stance: a benign view of the CPUSA or depicting domestic opposition to communism in highly negative terms. In these journals there has been no debate: only one side is heard from.

Read the whole interview, starting with Glazov's own experience with the gulags. Thanks to Amritas for the find.

Posted by: Sarah at 02:21 AM | Comments (1) | Add Comment
Post contains 209 words, total size 2 kb.

1 Thanks, John Earl Haynes has been a favorite of mine for years. His "Red Scare or Red Menace" is the best short history on the subject around.

Posted by: Grant Jones at January 20, 2005 09:43 PM (hnBt2)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
42kb generated in CPU 0.0108, elapsed 0.0804 seconds.
48 queries taking 0.073 seconds, 170 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.