March 25, 2008


The Washington Post put out an article on why the recent crop of Iraq war movies aren't doing so well. What's their take?

For now, Kuntz agrees with Bochco: "We're bombarded by information about [Iraq] 24 hours a day," he says. "We already know plenty about it. We don't need to learn more about it from the movies. Right now, it's something people want to forget and escape from. I speak for the American public when I say, 'What a bummer.' "

I speak for my blog when I say, "What a jackass."

They go through this huge list of anti-war movies and wonder why the public isn't interested. Hmmm, let me take a stab at it: Make a movie like 300, and people will flock to the theater. Make the soldiers the freaking good guys, and you've got yourself a hit; make them rapists or dupes or Tools of the Bushitler Oil Junta, and no one wants to see your damn movie.

Maybe dumb people think the Iraq war is a "bummer" because all your movies present it that way.

You know, Neil tried to shop his blog Armor Geddon around as a book. No one wanted to buy it. They told him it needed more inner-angst. He needed to be more conflicted about his role in the war. He needed to not rejoice when they blew up a house full of terrorists. Eventually he gave up, because they weren't buying what he was selling: a book about a soldier who was proud of his platoon and proud to support the mission.

But I bet people would've bought his book. Regular, average, everyday Americans want patriotism, heroes, and victory. They don't want inner-angst and movies about soldiers who got stop-lossed and don't really want to be there.

Sheesh, any waitress or truck driver could figure this out. But apparently journalists from The Washington Post think it's a mystery.

Posted by: Sarah at 09:03 AM | Comments (3) | Add Comment
Post contains 334 words, total size 2 kb.

1 How is Neil by the way? I miss reading his blog. He should self publish a book. People will be interested in buying it.

Posted by: Mare at March 25, 2008 11:06 AM (EI19G)

2 Well, that explains how that other book we read got published... You know - THAT one.

Posted by: airforcewife at March 25, 2008 11:32 AM (mIbWn)

3 He should have self-published, e.g., via Lulu.

Posted by: Nathan at March 26, 2008 11:59 AM (oj4/D)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
43kb generated in CPU 0.0115, elapsed 0.073 seconds.
48 queries taking 0.0657 seconds, 172 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.