November 30, 2006
TWO STEPS BACK
Dear Michael Richards,
This letter will remind you of the letter I wrote to the Abu Ghraib jerks. That's because I realized today that we've got ourselves an analogy here. Remember the SAT? Here's a good one for you:
Abu Ghraib soldiers : Iraq :: Michael Richards : race relations
Yes, Kramer, you're the Lynnie England of race.
The rest of us work hard to heal the wounds of yesteryear. We try to treat people fairly, we make sure we never say something that could offend, and we work to keep our country moving forward towards harmony between the races. And you come along and yell at someone about lynching.
What in the holy hell were you thinking?
When I first heard this story, I thought it was weird and dumb. But I really didn't think it mattered in the long run. Then I read this sentence in a completely unrelated article today:
If blacks are to fight the plague that is racial ugliness -- and racism remains one of the great threats to the Republic, no question about it, just ask that Seinfeld loser or Mel Gibson -- then we have to be honest with ourselves.
So now, thanks to you, people with an agenda can hold you up as the Paragon of Racism. See, white people are racist deep down: that Kramer guy called people the n-word. Just like how the Abu Ghraib soldiers destroyed the reputation of all the other honorable and admirable soldiers in Iraq, you have destroyed whatever credibility we white people have when we claim that racism isn't nearly as bad as some people let on.
Now my college roommate, who was afraid of walking across campus for fear of being lynched, will have more of a reason to think all white people really are out to get her. Now when some loser celeb says that the president hates black people, someone might honestly think that a tirade about lynching could just as easily come out of Bush's mouth as it did out of yours.
Black people everywhere will be waiting for the racist shoe to drop, thanks to you.
Most of us are not racist. We don't think lynchings are funny. We have enough of a moral or societal compass to know that what you did was completely out of line. And weird. Most of us don't have that crap bubbling right below the surface. Slight provocation won't give us n-word diarrhea of the mouth. We look at what you did as the strangest and most horrifying thing you can think of.
But to the black author of that article, it was just proof that "racism remains one of the great threats to the Republic."
Thanks a lot. All the progress that we white people have made to try to prove that we judge on the content of character: gone.
I hate you for that.
Sarah
Posted by: Sarah at
09:49 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 489 words, total size 3 kb.
1
Actually, I'm still completely stunned by the whole incident. I can't tell you how many times I've seen that stinking tape played and re-played on CNN and it's almost like watching a wild man...and then you see him apologizing on Letterman, talking about himself in the third person, like it was his alter ego up there. I completely agree that we all DO NOT have those words lying dormant in our minds. I just can't believe that the man on that tape is the guy I've laughed at so many times while watching "Seinfeld." Sad.
Posted by: nicole at November 30, 2006 12:26 PM (V53sO)
2
Hopefully, most of us black people will not make such a leap, because we are smarter than that. Hopefully, most of us will see this for what it is... an actor with little experience in the stand-up realm who freaked out when some black people in the audience heckled him. What I know now about Michael Richards, rather than every white person in America, is that he had the n-word lying dormant in his mind, and he couldn't handle the pressure of performing his craft.
What I know about Michael Richards now is that he is a really small man that said some really wrong things. He has also ruined it for his "Seinfeld" costars because I will no longer be watching that show. He was my favorite character.
Posted by: Terri at December 01, 2006 10:05 AM (cgjLF)
3
Terri, I'm so glad that you see this the way I do: as a very WEIRD thing. I have no idea how Richards grew up or what his problem is; this is just beyond my realm of understanding. I was so disappointed to see that Freeman article though. I want to be judged on the content of my own character too, not lumped in with lunatics like Kramer.
Posted by: Sarah at December 01, 2006 10:17 AM (7Wklx)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
November 17, 2006
TAXES
CaliValleyGenius has a post up about
taxes.
I've written so many times here about fraud, waste, and abuse. I can think of dozens of examples in my own life of how the government wastes money in the military community. And if they're wasting it in the few places I've been, I can't stand to think how much waste there really is.
I've got one word to sum up fraud, waste, and abuse: Pearl.
Pearl was our education counselor in Germany. She was brought out of retirement to fill the position. She gave soldiers so much wrong advice that it makes me ill, she couldn't write a grammatical sentence to save her life, and she constantly brought me her work and asked for help because she didn't understand. I made $8.50 an hour; she made over $60,000 a year.
And if there's one Pearl, there are surely plenty of others.
The government doesn't spend money wisely, and there aren't many checkups once it's spent to make sure they're getting bang for their buck. I don't want the government to have a dime more than they need.
Posted by: Sarah at
09:30 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 187 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Hi Sarah!
Thanks for commenting on the taxes post.
Your blog is fantastic! I can see I'll be a daily reader from here on out.
Have a good day today!
Posted by: KC at November 17, 2006 10:40 AM (TSy2I)
2
Oh man, don't even get me started on Pearl. She surely has to be the biggest waste of the Army's money. Ever. (although I've seen some pretty awful waste and fraud in the Army.)
Posted by: Erin at November 26, 2006 05:39 AM (D8Fkq)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
November 11, 2006
CONTRAST
The other night when my husband got home from his staff ride, his world had changed: a Democrat Congress, an Army without Rumsfeld, a potential slot in Civil Affairs, and a new deployment to a completely different country. He paced around the bedroom for a long time, talking out all the different possible futures and what he might accomplish in either Iraq or Afghanistan. I sarcastically added that, given the change from elephant to donkey, it might all be moot because the troops could be home. Agitated, he said, "I know, I know, that's why I have to get there as soon as possible so I can help before it's too late."
My husband's visible discomfort that he might not have another opportunity to put to use all he learned in Iraq, all he has digested and mulled over for two years, stands in stark contrast to the Iraqi quoted in this article:
“What was I going to wait for that would keep me on the force?” said Mohammed Humadi, a police captain who quit in August after one of his commanders was killed and beheaded. “Nothing was going to get any better. I have children, and if I were to sacrifice myself, it wouldn’t change anything.”
I struggle daily with the two opposing camps of the War in Iraq: those who say that the US has no business trying to set up a utopia halfway across the world, and those whose idealism bubbles over into dreams of playing Iraq in the World Cup. But the one thing I do know is that it's a knife in my heart that my husband would give his life for Iraq while this Iraqi would not.
A knife in my heart.
Posted by: Sarah at
04:07 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 290 words, total size 2 kb.
1
It's no different in this country. There are many who say those same words when it comes to the defense of this country. Fortunately, there will always be enough that step forward, here and there.
Posted by: R1 at November 11, 2006 06:24 PM (xexA1)
2
Sarah, our husbands are brothers in arms and brothers in spirit. My husband is serving in Iraq and heartbroken that he was assigned to a hardened base. He feels that he won't be able to make a difference from behind the wire, and is frustrated that his skills won't be fully utilized.
I am proud and honored that he is so willing to give everything to promote peace and democracy 1/2 way around the world. I'm also thankful that he likely won't be dodging bullets... I'm hopeful for our world, and also human.
Posted by: US Navy Wife at November 12, 2006 11:43 AM (GUuEB)
3
Now is not the time to give up and redeploy. Now is the time to stay strong and pick up the slack. Through out history it is the few who provide freedom for the many. Not all have the heart to be a warrior.
St. Crispen's Day Speech: William Shakespeare, 1599
WESTMORELAND. O that we now had here
But one ten thousand of those men in England
That do no work to-day!
KING. What's he that wishes so?
My cousin Westmoreland? No, my fair cousin;
If we are mark'd to die, we are enow
To do our country loss; and if to live,
The fewer men, the greater share of honour.
God's will! I pray thee, wish not one man more.
By Jove, I am not covetous for gold,
Nor care I who doth feed upon my cost;
It yearns me not if men my garments wear;
Such outward things dwell not in my desires.
But if it be a sin to covet honour,
I am the most offending soul alive.
No, faith, my coz, wish not a man from England.
God's peace! I would not lose so great an honour
As one man more methinks would share from me
For the best hope I have. O, do not wish one more!
Rather proclaim it, Westmoreland, through my host,
That he which hath no stomach to this fight,
Let him depart; his passport shall be made,
And crowns for convoy put into his purse;
We would not die in that man's company
That fears his fellowship to die with us.
This day is call'd the feast of Crispian.
He that outlives this day, and comes safe home,
Will stand a tip-toe when this day is nam'd,
And rouse him at the name of Crispian.
He that shall live this day, and see old age,
Will yearly on the vigil feast his neighbours,
And say 'To-morrow is Saint Crispian.'
Then will he strip his sleeve and show his scars,
And say 'These wounds I had on Crispian's day.'
Old men forget; yet all shall be forgot,
But he'll remember, with advantages,
What feats he did that day. Then shall our names,
Familiar in his mouth as household words-
Harry the King, Bedford and Exeter,
Warwick and Talbot, Salisbury and Gloucester-
Be in their flowing cups freshly rememb'red.
This story shall the good man teach his son;
And Crispin Crispian shall ne'er go by,
From this day to the ending of the world,
But we in it shall be remembered-
We few, we happy few, we band of brothers;
For he to-day that sheds his blood with me
Shall be my brother; be he ne'er so vile,
This day shall gentle his condition;
Make him a member of the gentry, even if he is a commoner.
And gentlemen in England now-a-bed
Shall think themselves accurs'd they were not here,
And hold their manhoods cheap whiles any speaks
That fought with us upon Saint Crispin's day.
Before the Battle of Agincourt,
25 October 1415
Posted by: Jimmy Valentie's brother at November 22, 2006 09:15 AM (twzGk)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
November 07, 2006
FINGERS CROSSED
Oh lord, here's what we have to look forward to: Democrat constituents screeching for
impeachment.
Posted by: Sarah at
01:23 PM
| Comments (9)
| Add Comment
Post contains 19 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I am seriously sitting here in amazement...
"Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi"...
It is like a nightmare
Posted by: armywifetoddlermom at November 07, 2006 07:06 PM (GrO13)
2
It hurts. It really, really hurts. Ugh!
Posted by: Andi at November 07, 2006 07:48 PM (EWp6N)
3
Talent is conceding now. Another good man goes down. How depressing.
Posted by: annika at November 07, 2006 09:06 PM (qQD4Q)
4
It's 1:30 a.m. and I'm going to bed now--depressed! I was hoping we'd win in MO and was sad to see Santorum lose. It will be interesting to see what the Dems will talk about now.
Mama
Posted by: Nancy at November 07, 2006 09:33 PM (la03/)
5
Reelax. Nothing's going to happen to your precious war of terror.
Posted by: Will at November 07, 2006 11:46 PM (QRBGL)
6
Nancy Pelosi, Italian-American mother of five. Look upon her ye mortals and tremble. Uh... O.K. If you want.
Posted by: Rob Roberts at November 08, 2006 12:43 AM (KYrZO)
7
Yes Will, that's it, our “precious war of terror.”
Idiot.
Posted by: tim at November 08, 2006 11:49 AM (nno0f)
8
Well, I suppose the House will wait until after the Christmas (can I use that word?) holidays before convening impeachment/war crimes hearings. (Of course the House will, since the next Congress doesn't convene until next year--just my futile attempt at a joke.)
Keep the faith, y'all
Jim
Posted by: Jim Shawley at November 08, 2006 01:56 PM (pNMXt)
9
RUMSFIELD IS RESIGNING! Oh... wow.. I can't tell you what this feels like. It feels like... I don't quite know... it's definately something I haven't felt in quite some time. National pride maybe? Hey, maybe we won't torture people anymore? OH MAN! This is great!
I feel like.. I feel like dancing! I'm going to go out tonite, and I'm going to get crunked, because this is a great nation where crunking is possible, and I'm going to dance!
Posted by: Will at November 08, 2006 03:01 PM (QRBGL)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
SWEET
Here's something I don't remember noticing in July: Saddam
specifically asked not to be hanged like a common criminal.
"I advise you as an Iraqi, if you were in a circumstance in which you have to issue a death penalty, you have to remember that Saddam is a military man and in this case the verdict should be death by shooting not by hanging," [Saddam] told the judge.
Justice, thy name is the gallows.
Posted by: Sarah at
01:15 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 75 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Exactly. I was reading about that and just holding my breath - that he would swing.....
Posted by: Tammi at November 07, 2006 02:16 PM (/Mga0)
2
Actually, it reminds me of Herman Goering.
Hope his guards are keeping a sharp eye on him and he hasn't been developing a friendly relationship with any of them.
Posted by: Patrick Chester at November 08, 2006 02:06 AM (MKaa5)
3
A “military man” my a$$. A dictator is no more a military man than a newspaper boy is a journalist.
“Justice, thy name is the gallows.” Exactly, hope they let his toes just barley touch the floor so it takes awhile for death to relieve his miserable existence.
Posted by: tim at November 08, 2006 11:44 AM (nno0f)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
MSN BLOWS IT AGAIN
I was intrigued by the MSN link called
Women: 20 musts before 40. Geez, I've only got eleven years left! I'd better get in gear.
Uh, what?
All in all, MSN advocates $94,154 worth of consumer goods, plus pricetagless trips to see the Dalai Lama and a haircut from some famous L.A. barber.
Get real.
A Cadillac XLR roadster and Gucci luggage? That's what women need? Doesn't the average American household have something like $8000 in consumer debt? And MSN thinks that suggesting $4000 watches and trips to Mongolia is a good idea?
Seriously, what planet are these people living on? You know what women need by the age of 40? Maturity and self-respect. Then they won't fill that void with fancy suits, watches, haircuts, and cars.
Some of the suggestions were reasonable: a subscription to a smarty-smart magazine, a few jazz CDs, and some classic movies. Get people to broaden their horizons. Even a trip isn't a bad idea, though it's condescending to say that Europe is oh-so-yesterday and now the Third World is where it's at. Maybe MSN can encourage these women to adopt an African baby while they're there; it's all the rage, right?
I'm regularly disgusted and offended by the nonsense MSN prints, but this is just over the top. Who do they think their target audience is, suggesting a $78,000 car? Is Julie Greenwald hanging out on MSN trying to figure out what she should buy with her millions? I imagine most women who click that link are looking for more spiritual advice: find a hobby you really love, teach your children to waltz, volunteer for a charity that empowers you. Not more ways to spend money.
What the hell is wrong with our culture, that this passes as advice for women?
Posted by: Sarah at
03:24 AM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 305 words, total size 2 kb.
1
The list rings a bell, and I know why: it is actually from Marie Claire Magazine, and I read that list in disbelief a few weeks ago too. I think there was some mention of super expensive luggage too. And from someone who travels a lot, I just snorted at that. (Oh I see that you mentioned it too...my bad...yeah, Gucci luggage, whatevers).
Some people are so impracticle. Case in point: we are dogsitting this week. My friend dropped off her 8 month old boxer, and the dog has two collars, one that she has on all the time, that is a little tougher, and then one that she puts on the dog when they walk out the door...wanna know what that one is? A Louis Vuitton dog collar. I just snorted and put it in the drawer saying it was so flimsey and useless, and that I certainly wouldn't be trying to restrain the dog with that.
Anyways, I digress. Must-haves really aren't must haves anymore. It seems like the new must have is "massive debt."
Posted by: CaliValleyGirl at November 07, 2006 06:13 AM (deur4)
2
I've noticed MSN has started to use Marie Clare A LOT lately when making their most wonderful articles. I've also noticed they are moving to articles that tend to link in ads of some sort. I wonder how much they really need the money if they need to use their articles to get money from vendors?
This article, though, does sicken me. Most women who do read this magazine are our age...in our 20s. And we all know the average 20-year old woman is most likely still recovering from their college debt and can no where near afford to buy these kinds of items. As if we should all strive to be able to buy the $3,000 Gucci or Prado. Wow...makes me wonder what the women of the 70s think of this article??
Posted by: Billie at November 07, 2006 07:28 AM (EKmeY)
3
Ah, speaking as a man around (*cough*) 40, IMHO one “must before 40” for a single woman would be to ask a man out, any man. Do it once and you may appreciate what we go through.
Posted by: tim at November 07, 2006 10:27 AM (nno0f)
4
Tim -- I was the one who asked my husband out on our first date. And then when I told him I liked him, he said he didn't realize it was a Date-Date, just that he thought that we were hanging out. And that's when he gave his famous "Well, I like you but I'm not going to marry you or anything" line. So, yeah, I've been there with the humiliation. Turned out OK in the end though...
Posted by: Sarah at November 07, 2006 11:04 AM (7Wklx)
5
Sarah,
Good one on yaÂ’. I hope some woman readers learn from your experience.
Posted by: sarah at November 08, 2006 11:36 AM (nno0f)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
November 06, 2006
TV BLOGGING AGAIN
I've been ranting about TV
elsewhere because I usually get it with both barrels when I write about TV here. Yes, I know it's not real.
Anyway, Teresa pointed out that Hollywood is not very good at writing realistic marriages. I was shocked recently to see that KFC commercial where the young wife is on the phone and she "signs" what she wants for dinner to her husband. And her husband's buddy doesn't get it, so he explains their secret language. Every time I see that commercial, I keep waiting for it to change. I keep waiting for the punchline to be that the husband is complete dufus who doesn't know anything about his wife. As it stands, that commercial is really stinking cute. It shows married people actually working in harmony, knowing each other on an extremely personal level. You never get that on TV.
Posted by: Sarah at
06:34 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 152 words, total size 1 kb.
1
And the de-lurking commences...
Have you heard of the sci-fi TV show Firefly or its movie Serenity? Created by genius (and liberal) Joss Whedon, it's funny, fascinating, and thrilling. Of the crew, the captain is vocally libertarian. Two of the characters are happily married. One character is a "shepherd" or pastor/missionary type who is not a kook, fanatic, or two-faced pervert.
You should try it if you haven't already.
Posted by: Sabbrielle at November 06, 2006 08:52 AM (C0EP2)
2
I've seen everyone in the blog world go nutso over Serenity, so I was planning on seeing it soon. My dad used to watch Firefly, but I just tuned in for John Doe afterwards!
Posted by: Sarah at November 06, 2006 09:19 AM (7Wklx)
3
I recommend watching Firefly first. There are fourteen total episodes. The Sci-fi channel is showing a Firefly marathon on December 12th. Of course, if your husband already likes the show, the DVD set would be a good investment.
*shameless*
Posted by: Sabbrielle at November 06, 2006 10:35 AM (C0EP2)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
MORE THOUGHTS ON SADDAM
I'm reminded again of the absolute horror my Swedish friend felt when she saw me clapping and cheering the day Timothy McVeigh was executed. But I feel the same now about Saddam as I did back then: If someone called me today and said they're short a hangman and could I come give 'em a hand, I'd say, "Give me a second to put my shoes on."
Smash is right:
Unfortunately, the sentence is not to be carried out at daybreak. Appeals and due process will delay the execution for months, if not years. Saddam will get more consideration than any of his victims ever received, and arguably more than he deserves, but that's one of the many differences between freedom and tyranny.
I guess this is enough consolation for today. At least it made our household chuckle:
Thousands of Iraqis sang, danced and unleashed celebratory bursts of gunfire yesterday as Saddam Hussein finally faced the consequences of his tyrannical rule in a Baghdad courtroom.
Oh, the Iraqis and their celebratory gunfire.
The husband's leaving for a field trip tomorrow, or else a cake would be in order. I'll just have to remember the deliciousness of the dragging-him-out-of-a-dirty-hole cake. And dream of the deliciousness of the hanging-by-his-broken-neck cake I'll get to make someday. Yummy.
Posted by: Sarah at
06:14 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 222 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Cox and Forkum's reprise of their 2005 cartoon is germane to this topic. And, I have to say - squeamish inoffensive fellow though I am - that the world will be improved by Saddam's absence. The only shame is that it couldn't have been sooner.
Posted by: Hiraethin at November 07, 2006 02:32 AM (hnFlP)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
November 03, 2006
YEESH
We're only living here temporarily, which means that I haven't got much of a social life. I don't have a single, actual, real-life human being friend here, unless you count the apartment complex staff. The only "conversation" I've had in the past five months has been the internet kind, which is bad because I've been living in a bubble. When you spend that much time in the internet community, you forget that we're such a small slice of the population.
I just caught the tail-end of a radio trivia gimmick, where a caller had to answer some questions. She had no idea who Dennis Hastert is, she couldn't provide a line from the "Star-Spangled Banner", and she didn't have the first guess what the Dow was at...in fact, she thought "the Dow" was a new type of WMD. I am not kidding. It might've been funny if it weren't so stinking depressing.
So beware the internet bubble. And be glad half the country doesn't vote.
Posted by: Sarah at
05:38 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 167 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I remember those days very, very well. They sucked. Too bad we've moved from KC to small town Pennsylvania or maybe we could meet up sometime.
Since we don't go to church, I've found that new friends (off-line) as an adult are usually limited to co-workers. Any ideas on a way around that?
Posted by: Beth at November 03, 2006 07:46 AM (foc8x)
2
Hey, Beth, good to hear from you. I am currently not working, so I can't even meet people that way. And things aren't really "family friendly" in my husband's course, so there are no organized events (unlike when we were at Fort Knox, when there was a get-together every Friday evening.) Hopefully things look up when we move, but we'll see.
Posted by: Sarah at November 03, 2006 08:31 AM (7Wklx)
3
Yes, we've lived in places where I was so lonely I went to those Candle parties people would invite you to and you'd think it was because they liked you only to discover they want you to buy a Thirty dollar piece of wax.
At least you have the internet!
Awesome photo, btw.
Posted by: nancy French at November 03, 2006 09:02 AM (8i2KG)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
76kb generated in CPU 0.0183, elapsed 0.0986 seconds.
55 queries taking 0.0862 seconds, 213 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.