January 28, 2007
THIS BETTER BE ANOTHER BOTCHED JOKE
Thank heavens
this man did not end up as our president...
MORE:
Nor this guy our vice-president (via Conservative Grapevine)...
Posted by: Sarah at
02:45 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 32 words, total size 1 kb.
1
That made me sick when I read it this morning...
honestly
Posted by: armywifetoddlermom at January 28, 2007 09:11 AM (30YLh)
2
You should check out the Wikipedia entry on the Bush ranch in Crawford. Then compare and contrast what it says to the information about the newly built Edwards compound.
Posted by: Peggy at January 28, 2007 11:36 AM (YIvFn)
3
OK? At first glance, Crawford appears to be half as big and more eco-friendly. But what I really was linking to was the paragraphs at the end of Ham's post.
Posted by: Sarah at January 28, 2007 11:44 AM (BP8jf)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 25, 2007
AWWWW
If I enjoy my child half as much as
Lileks enjoys Gnat, then we'll be a happy little family indeed.
Posted by: Sarah at
03:43 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 22 words, total size 1 kb.
January 22, 2007
GO
Read Varifrank's
10 Things I Learned From Iraq
Posted by: Sarah at
04:18 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 10 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Apparently he missed the biggest and most obvious lessons to be learned from Iraq:
- The American people will not support a war based upon lies.
- An illegal, immoral and unjust war forces warriers to make compromises on morality. That is never a good thing for those with sound moral values. (For the others it doesn't matter.)
These are tough but important lessons that every soldier should take to heart.
Posted by: ken at January 22, 2007 09:30 AM (0vAg+)
2
I thought of something else for Varifranks to add to his clever analogy between Bosnia and Iraq: Bosnia was in a sectarian civil war that we didn't start. Iraq is in a sectarian civil war that we did start. Ooops.
Posted by: Will at January 22, 2007 12:18 PM (QRBGL)
3
Interesting. I saw "ken" post pretty much the same thing over at Blackfive.
Guess another L³ memetic surge is underway.
Posted by: Patrick Chester at January 24, 2007 06:37 AM (MKaa5)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 17, 2007
January 08, 2007
VFW
Walmart takes a lot of crap, so I thought this webpage where
the VFW thanks Walmart for their support was pretty cool.
Posted by: Sarah at
11:47 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 24 words, total size 1 kb.
1
In the place of open-air markets we now have big box supercenters. Mom and Pop have given way to the forced smiles of checkout clerks and supervisors in stiff suits. A few questions:
-What have we lost in trading authentic community for the rock bottom prices? What is a vibrant neighborhood worth?
-How is it that a company that generates $10.5 billion a year can't afford to pay for medical benefits or staff overtime?
-Why do the women working for Wal-Mart carry food tamps in their wallets?
I have to wonder if the cost to communities is actually good for our economy overall. There must be a system out there that is more interesting, dynamic and fulfilling.
Posted by: Will at January 08, 2007 08:33 PM (QRBGL)
2
http://www.goodmagazine.com/section/Provocations/Unconscious_Consumption
I wrote the above Wal-Mart piece, and boy am I getting hammered. LOL.
Posted by: Nancy at January 09, 2007 07:36 PM (8i2KG)
3
I'm not going to pretend I read all of that nancy, but what I did read only raised one question in my mind - do you want your kids to be like sweatshop workers in mexico one day? Or do you want to continue to live in a first world country?
Okay, I guess that's kind of two questions.
Posted by: Will Somerset at January 10, 2007 03:23 PM (QRBGL)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
INSIGHT FROM ALLICADEM
When I first started blogging, I linked to everything I liked. Now I've gotten much lazier and there's just too much good stuff out there to highlight it all. But
you should read this.
Posted by: Sarah at
11:02 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 40 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Sarah,
I think I will cross post this to the link you have here. I am 70 now, I remember Pearl Harbor, I was a child but we all knew instantly we were at war. It is unreal to me to hear the newscasters and pundits on TV and radio who are so political about the war we are in.
Political power apparently means more to them than the lives of our soldiers and the Middle East people. I wish I could see a study, or had the energy and means to do it myself, to see what the correlation is between the escalation in the war deaths and the type of news reporting done here. I remember the posters of "loose lips sink ship." I went to the movies every Saturday and saw the newsreels, war newsreels; knew people who left for the service, saw the gold stars in the windows, and saw the train loads of service men go through town. We ALL knew who the enemy was, it wasn't a Democrat or Republican, it was THEM, Japan or Germany or Italy, or their allies. What has happened to education and our world that we don't know now who is the enemy?
Posted by: Ruth H at January 08, 2007 12:46 PM (rVJTF)
2
"But the best happiness comes from the times of the most suffering. The Great Depression. World War II." -spoken like a true gen x-er.
Yeah, too bad there's not a clear cut enemy for you guys to go to glorious battle with anymore.
Posted by: Will at January 08, 2007 08:24 PM (QRBGL)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 03, 2007
LINK
Varifrank's entry on Saddam's execution:
Gauge the distance
Posted by: Sarah at
12:29 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 10 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Thanks for the link. I actually thought of this when Saddam was done swinging and all the brouhaha started. It angers me to no end to see how we’ve become such delicate, PC wimps in this country that when the Butcher of Baghdad is finally sent to his maker and people are worried that it didn’t meet some standard. Who cares, good riddance a –hole.
Fred Barnes of the The Weekly Standard went off on Fox Sat. on the News Hour when the other guest were opining about the taunting at the hanging by the Shiites and the bad impression it conveyed to the Sunnis. He basically said, (paraphrasing) “So what! The Sunnis minority ran that country with an iron fist and brutalized the majority Shiites. Who cares if the Sunnis are offended, they are responsible for a lot of the insurgency and they need to be put down and squashed to end the bloodshed that is happening there everyday. Let them be offended.”
Posted by: tim at January 04, 2007 11:30 AM (nno0f)
2
The media, including South Park, built old crazy Saddam into such a charicature and such a character that I couldn't help but feel a little sad while reading the newspaper about his death.
Posted by: Will at January 04, 2007 01:38 PM (QRBGL)
3
Like I said, "delicate, PC wimps".
Posted by: tim at January 05, 2007 07:23 AM (nno0f)
4
Any man's death diminishes me, because I am involved in mankind; and therefore never send to know for whom the bell tolls; it tolls for thee.
Posted by: Will at January 05, 2007 01:14 PM (QRBGL)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
December 28, 2006
NEWS, EVERYONE!
Ho.Ly.Crap.
Saddam to be hanged by Sunday
This calls for one of my cakes!
Posted by: Sarah at
04:13 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 18 words, total size 1 kb.
1
It couldn't have happened to a nicer guy.
Posted by: R at December 28, 2006 06:40 PM (xexA1)
2
Nothing I am typing seems appropriate. It's
either too harsh or not harsh enough.
So I will just say:THANK YOU to Sarah's husband
and his brothers in arms for their service to
this country.
Posted by: MaryIndiana at December 28, 2006 08:11 PM (V5Xp/)
3
(*whistling the theme from “Hang ’em High”*)

Happy New Years!
Posted by: tim at December 29, 2006 08:41 AM (nno0f)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
December 07, 2006
RESOLUTE
On this day that will
live in infamy:
No matter how long it may take us to overcome this premeditated invasion, the American people in their righteous might will win through to absolute victory.
I believe I interpret the will of the Congress and of the people when I assert that we will not only defend ourselves to the uttermost, but will make very certain that this form of treachery shall never endanger us again.
Hostilities exist. There is no blinking at the fact that our people, our territory and our interests are in grave danger.
With confidence in our armed forces - with the unbounding determination of our people - we will gain the inevitable triumph - so help us God.
Posted by: Sarah at
01:40 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 124 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Rally, rally, rally! Wait, we aleady won that war. Lately methinks you've been wishing you had a time machine and were living in 1941. I know you would respond with something like "this is a different time and a different kind of war, but it's all for the same cause and is just as important."
But I've come to the decision that any war that can't be won militarily, on the battlefield, soldier versus soldier and general versus general, isn't a war that is in Amerca's interest to win.
If torture and the lifting of habeas corpus from your citizens and widespread domestic spying and all of that bash-the-UN-crap is needed, that means something is very wrong at the root of your cause.
I have to admit to myself that even I wish we lived in better times - times like 1941 even. I mean, we took some big punches that year, but our grandfathers stepped it up big in pursuit of a noble cause. But, here we are. And don't get me wrong - we live in interesting times. It's the most interesting time in the history of human beings I'm sure. So I'm not bored, at least.
Posted by: Will at December 07, 2006 10:22 AM (QRBGL)
2
Great speech. Shocking that it's been 60+ years since.
Posted by: PoliticalCritic at December 09, 2006 01:43 PM (fXDWP)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
December 02, 2006
November 30, 2006
COOL
I'll be interested in reading Bjorn Lomborg's new book when it comes out. Check out this
interview with him.
Posted by: Sarah at
04:33 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 21 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Sarah,
I have no idea why I was surprised to see this on your blog... maybe because I don't run across many who have read such authors, but with the breadth of topics you touch on, I really should not be surprised. Thanks for the heads up that a new book will be coming out.
Posted by: jck at December 01, 2006 04:54 AM (fRt6P)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
November 21, 2006
November 20, 2006
GO
Read
this.
Posted by: Sarah at
03:46 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 4 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I was going to link that tomorrow morning. It's beautiful isn't it?!?! Reminds me of that post Val did over at Bablu blog after his visit.
Posted by: Tammi at November 20, 2006 05:19 PM (3UQTn)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
November 18, 2006
LINK
Let Them Eat Bullets
A nation that's defended Europe from aggression in the 60 years since World War II is asking why Iraq can't defend itself. The fact is, Iraqis risk their lives for their country every day.
Clearly the days when Democrats warned of a long twilight struggle and pledged to pay any price and bear any burden to ensure the success and survival of liberty are over, judging from remarks by Carl Levin, incoming chairman of the Senate Armed Service Committee.
"We cannot save the Iraqis from themselves," Levin opined Wednesday at a Capitol Hill press conference. "The only way for Iraqi leaders to squarely face that reality is for President Bush to tell them that the United States will begin a phased redeployment of our forces within four to six months."
"We cannot be their security blanket," he added. But why not, if it's in our best long-term security interest?
Yes, we should demand more of the Iraqis. But those who ask whether we can or should stop Iraqis from killing themselves forget that we're in this to stop others from killing us and using Iraq as a base camp from which to do it.
We've been Europe's security blanket for six decades. We are Japan's security blanket. We are South Korea's. It's been said that were it not for us, the French would be speaking German and the Germans would be speaking Russian. In 1938, the West decided it couldn't be Czechoslovakia's security blanket and sold out that country in Munich, Germany. The rest, as they say, is history.
Read the rest. Via Cold Fury and Instapundit, who says he'd like to see a phased redeployment from Europe. And how.
Posted by: Sarah at
04:23 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 286 words, total size 2 kb.
1
I thought conservatives believed in laissez-faire economics and self-determination. The government in Iraq is too big right now, too imposing and too costly. All these social benefits we're trying to give Iraqis, like education and life, are going to create a huge debt and raise taxes. I say cut back on government spending in Iraq, especially within the security budget, and let the Iraqis be free to govern themselves.
Posted by: Will at November 18, 2006 11:51 AM (QRBGL)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
November 17, 2006
POOR CONDI
Slighted...
In the past week, there are 476 documents on Nexis heralding the magnificent achievement of Nancy Pelosi becoming the FIRST WOMAN speaker of the House.
I thought we had moved beyond such multicultural milestones.
The media yawned when Condoleezza Rice became the first black woman secretary of state (and when Lincoln Chafee became the first developmentally disabled senator).
There were only 77 documents noting that Rice was the first black woman to be the secretary of state, and half of them were issues of Jet, Essence, Ebony or Black Entrepreneur magazine.
Posted by: Sarah at
02:53 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 96 words, total size 1 kb.
November 15, 2006
SET YOUR VCR
Make sure you try to see this show tonight:
Exposed: The Extremist Agenda. Glenn Beck is running footage from the Middle Eastern media. It'll be like LGF, only on TV.
Posted by: Sarah at
11:23 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 36 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Shocked me to see such a superior piece of programming on CNN. I wonder how its ratings were.
Posted by: Glenmore at November 15, 2006 06:55 PM (c+5pw)
2
I watched it - thanks for telling me about it. OUTSTANDING.
Posted by: Tammi at November 16, 2006 02:20 AM (3UQTn)
3
It was excellent...of course I had to wait until the midnight re-showing in order to see the last 10 minutes. It seems Comcast our local cable company saw fit to run their local "Public Affairs" segment at that time.
I was stunned that CNN ran it. Maybe an effort to make up for their "sniper" video. I taped the midnight showwing to pass on to others.
Has anyone seen "Obsession"?
Posted by: Jim at November 16, 2006 11:17 AM (XlSqK)
4
I, uh, missed this one. Can anyone sum it up? Personally, i don't know any extremists, but I do work with an Iraqi man and the more I talk with him about the current situation, the less I'm inclined to believe that democracy is possible in Iraq. They really just want strong dictators to make the big decisions for them, and religion IS politics there. The Bush adminstration had to realize this, so it makes their actions in Iraq seem even more dubious to me.
P.S. The Iraqi man is Kurdish and thinks Saddam is the devil, so he's happy that Saddam is gone. He supports the decision to divide Iraq into 3 provinces... 3 provinces each led by dictators.
Posted by: Will at November 16, 2006 01:45 PM (QRBGL)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
November 14, 2006
FOOD FOR THOUGHT
I missed this last week, from the always-genius Annika:
I blame Bush.
Posted by: Sarah at
04:49 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 18 words, total size 1 kb.
GITCHER STEYN FIX
John Hawkins has an
interview with Mark Steyn, whose new book is apparently on Pres Bush's nightstand. Here's one interesting tidbit from the interview:
I mean this idea that it's normal for the state to be as big as it is in advanced social democratic societies is something that would have seemed incredible to anyone a hundred years ago. I mean, I remember being struck by - on September 11th - and I was writing a column a couple of days afterwards and, you know, we're all done with our initial reaction, so you're trying to think a couple of days ahead and find a new angle on it, and I happen to just notice that it was more or less (a hundred years after the) assassination of President McKinley. I was thinking, well, maybe I could tie these two things together, these two big traumatizing events and, you know, bookending the century, whatever - you know, just peck, peck, peck - we journalists always are going to peck.
So I sort of rummaged around the clippings of President McKinley's assassination and realized that while people were upset about it, they essentially regarded it as the removal of a remote figure who played a peripheral part in their lives. To that point for most people in most parts of the U.S. the federal government did not impinge on their life in any way.
So when people talk about the modern social democratic state, you know, cradle to grave entitlements, we should understand that it is, in effect, a huge experimental departure from the normal course of human history - and the experiment as we can see in almost every other country apart from the U.S. has failed.
And if you need an even bigger dose of Steyn, check out his newest column:
If they'd done a Spain -- blown up a bunch of subway cars in New York or vaporized the Empire State Building -- they'd have re-awoken the primal anger of September 2001. With another mound of corpses piled sky-high, the electorate would have stampeded into the Republican column and demanded the U.S. fly somewhere and bomb someone.
The jihad crowd know that. So instead they employed a craftier strategy. Their view of America is roughly that of the British historian Niall Ferguson -- that the Great Satan is the first superpower with ADHD. They reasoned that if you could subject Americans to the drip-drip-drip of remorseless water torture in the deserts of Mesopotamia -- a couple of deaths here, a market bombing there, cars burning, smoke over the city on the evening news, day after day after day, and ratcheted up a notch or two for the weeks before the election -- you could grind down enough of the electorate and persuade them to vote like Spaniards, without even realizing it. And it worked.
Posted by: Sarah at
04:39 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 482 words, total size 3 kb.
1
I think America is (and will be) much better at going to war with other militarily-equipped superpowers then it is at playing these half-wars in places like Vietnam and Iraq where the American people don't understand our role and where we look like a bunch of bullies internationally.
Posted by: Will at November 14, 2006 01:49 PM (QRBGL)
2
Probably true, Will. But you have to take action based on what the situation needs, not what you're best at. Otherwise, you will be like the man who looked for his keys under the lamp post (even though that wasn't where he dropped them) because that's where the light was best.
Posted by: david foster at November 14, 2006 03:31 PM (/Z304)
3
Good philosophy David, but I think it's been duly proven that our keys are not in Iraq.
Posted by: Will at November 14, 2006 06:15 PM (QRBGL)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
November 08, 2006
MORE ADVICE
Varifrank also has some
post-election advice for us.
By the way, my husband is "playing" Sherman in an exercise they're doing on his staff ride today. No one else wanted to touch Sherman with a ten foot pole. My husband, on the other hand, thinks he was a pretty smart guy.
Personally, I've just enjoyed teasing him about the "Civil War reenactment" he's participating in. Hopefully he can work in a game of grab-ass.
Posted by: Sarah at
12:34 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 78 words, total size 1 kb.
1
and whos my favorite general? Sherman.
Grants one hell of a guy though. After the war, he was visting England with his family and was invited to dine with Queen Victoria. When he was advised that his children would not be allowed to attend, he declined the offer, which simply staggered his hosts.
The Queen changed her mind, and actually had a great time with the kids(He was a devoted father to his kids...)
and thanks for visting.
Posted by: Frank Martin at November 08, 2006 04:12 PM (G+H5e)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
80kb generated in CPU 0.0979, elapsed 0.3255 seconds.
63 queries taking 0.2949 seconds, 241 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.