December 30, 2004
THIRD
The third part of that series is out:
World Speaks Our Language and Attends Our Colleges
For two years, the Pew Research Center for People and the Press polled 66,000 people from 44 countries on whether children "need to learn English to succeed in the world today."
The answer was a resounding "yes."
More than 95 percent of those surveyed in Indonesia, Germany and South Africa agreed that English is necessary for children. More than 90 percent of those surveyed in China, Japan, France and Ukraine agreed.
Only one of the 44 countries had a substantial minority that disagreed — 35 percent of Jordanians said English is not a necessity.
And that attitude will make all the difference for the future of the Middle East.
Posted by: Sarah at
04:21 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 127 words, total size 1 kb.
1
We recently went to a small village that is all Sunni and had strong links to the Hussein regime. Several former Ba'ath party big shots live in the town. In a recent trip to their local school, some teachers asked us for English language books. The teachers don't know English so there is no English curriculum at the moment but they hope to have one some day. They'd like to start preparing now. That's how important it is to them. Amazing.
Posted by: Blue 6 at December 30, 2004 04:38 AM (KQF5M)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
December 28, 2004
WHA?
I had to do a double take: an article about the US that's all
good? Woah.
America enjoys view from the top
And it looks like it's a five-part series; I'm anxious to read the rest.
Posted by: Sarah at
06:18 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 38 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Wow - amazing article! I had no idea our contribution to the global GDP was so high, on a per capita basis - that's incredible.
Thanks for the link!
Posted by: Barb at December 28, 2004 07:25 PM (q9AXC)
2
Well, the paper was the Washington Times, one of the few decent newspapers in the country. They actually went out and DEFENDED Donald Rumsfeld.
http://seandoherty.blogspot.com/2004/12/washington-times-follows-my-lead.html
Posted by: Sean at December 29, 2004 12:17 AM (cl3Om)
3
The Washington Times has always had a very conservative tendency. They are owned and run by the Rev. Moon of the Unification Church. Moon is nuts and very conservative. He uses his paper (which loses a boatload of money) as a propaganda outlet for his views.
Posted by: SomeRandomGuy at December 29, 2004 11:24 PM (MiV8c)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
December 19, 2004
CAN I CALL A DUDE'S SITE "PRETTY"?
Look at Bunker's new style for the
holiday season! I like it.
Posted by: Sarah at
03:53 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 26 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Thanks! After a couple of hours of trying different red/green combinations, I opted for the wintry stuff. As long as I don't have to live in it.
Posted by: Mike at December 19, 2004 09:33 PM (b7AUG)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
December 16, 2004
LAW
Law and order are coming to Iraq. In baby steps, naturally, but they're coming.
Posted by: Sarah at
03:23 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 16 words, total size 1 kb.
December 15, 2004
JUNK SCIENCE
I had read this
Michael Crichton speech on junk science before, pointed out by Kalroy, but I returned to it today, pointed out by Hud. It's amazing how much junk science we're inundated with every day. My favorite bit, per global warming:
Nobody believes a weather prediction twelve hours ahead. Now we're asked to believe a prediction that goes out 100 years into the future? And make financial investments based on that prediction? Has everybody lost their minds?
This is one of the best articles I've ever read.
Posted by: Sarah at
05:16 AM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
Post contains 92 words, total size 1 kb.
1
That was a great speech. You should check out junkscience.com. Has alot of feed for the fodder.
Posted by: Toni at December 15, 2004 09:48 AM (SHqVu)
2
I just put up a post using that as a link. Junk science is accepted by far too many people.
Posted by: Mike at December 15, 2004 01:25 PM (cyYKH)
3
This is one of the dumbest articles I've read in a long time. Predicting tomorrow's weather has little to do with predicting longterm climate change. Why don't you try looking up "weather" and "climate" in a dictionary, and note the difference before you endorse this drivel? But hey, a hack author of science fiction knows a lot more about the topic than people who actually, you know, study the subject as their life's work.
Posted by: Mr. Wiggles at December 15, 2004 02:11 PM (4YdzU)
4
I'm basically an agnostic on global warming, and am concerned that science has become so politicized. It's practically reached the point where to have an informed opinion of global warming, one must personally study the equations of quantitative climatology and buy a supercomputer to run in your basement.
People make forecasts about things 100 years out all the time, though. For example: if you build a dam, you must calculate the maximum probable flooding which is likely to occur within the next century...
Posted by: David Foster at December 15, 2004 04:48 PM (pMf09)
5
Crichton might be one of the best minds in our country.
His latest book, State of Fear, is actually based on that junk science speech.
Good for Crichton for standing up against the political correctness that has poisoned science and environmentalism.
Posted by: Mark at December 16, 2004 09:48 PM (Vg0tt)
6
If by "political correctness" you mean "best available evidence." Crichton is a NOVELIST, fool. Do you get your information on the tax code from John Updike?
Posted by: Mr. Wiggles at December 17, 2004 02:27 PM (4YdzU)
7
Welcome to the Pharmamx.com Family!
We invite you to visit us at www.pharmamx.com and find our great medicine prices with up to 90% discount per each item. We provide serious and first class service to all our customers 24/7. If we do not carry a medicine you need just let us know and we will be more than glad to assist you! To serve you is our goal, thank you in advance for your preference.
Posted by: Francisco Toteli at June 03, 2005 07:25 PM (+Rx1D)
8
http://visa-prepaid.finances-inco.com/aadvantage/ invisiblelisteningvulnerable
Posted by: round at August 13, 2005 09:06 PM (HF5wj)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
December 14, 2004
STEP THREE: PROFIT
Varifrank tackles the underpants gnomes of "import less oil".
Posted by: Sarah at
02:57 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 15 words, total size 1 kb.
1
My job could easily be performed from my home, or frankly anywhere in the world. None of the people I see at work actually have anything to do with what I do (other than checking my time sheets), and all of the people I contact who I actually work with, I have never seen in person. I have yet to convince my company to let me do that though. Working on it......
Posted by: John at December 14, 2004 05:29 AM (crTpS)
2
Changing culture is always harder than changing technology. When I started working remotely, my manager was very hesitant and generally non- supportive towards the idea of 'remote work', or as he called it " working from home". His joke was "working from home is like playing at work, a waste of time". I solved most of my problems with his perception of what "working at home" really means with the simple application of a webcam in my home office. I told him that he could watch me at work during any time of the day, just as if I was sitting down the hall in a cubicle in the same office. With the use of Instant Messenger and the phone he was quickly able to maintain better contact with me than he was with the 3 employees on our team in the office he worked in on the east coast.
After three months, he began to notice that althought he and the other three people in our group were busily going back and forth from home to an office, I was spending that time accomplishing actual work rahter than just moving 'to and fro'. I was vastly more productive than they were, even though they were all in the same office. I never got sick, I never got stuck in traffic and I was never late to a meeting, even though I was 3 time zones away.
After 6 months of close observation, he concluded that I had the better deal and he closed the east coast office and sent everyone home to work remotely. After 60 days of the normal 'decompression' that comes with working remotely, there wasnt anyone who said they wanted to go back to working in a traditional office.
My experience has been that once a company understands the direct and very real savings in money and the demonstrated improvement to the bottom line with increased productivity that occurs with "remote work", it all happens rather quickly.
It's getting over the initial perception that you are really home playing around and doing the laundry rather than working that is the hardest barrier to get through. The truth is you work harder remotely than you do at an office, its just that you dont mind it so much.
Posted by: Frank Martin at December 21, 2004 05:27 PM (tvWX6)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
December 07, 2004
SMART CELEB
I'd like to meet
Ben Stein. He sounds like a good guy.
Hud says:
I've talked to people on the left who live in red states, who told me they've encountered some ugliness for expressing their beliefs, but I'd be really surprised if they feel they have whisper to each other like the people in this article. Most lefties I know are pretty open about it. On the other hand, I have known many people on the right who were afriad to speak out for losing work. I've even had some people tell me I was risking never getting hired for the stuff I say on this blog. And what I tell them is, if you let people oppress you, they win. And now more people are going out and challenging the leftist orthodoxy
I know I never show my Bush support unless asked a direct question about whom I voted for, and we live on a military post, for pete's sake.
Posted by: Sarah at
05:45 AM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 166 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Sarah,
I know what you mean. I just like to see the look on people's faces when I tell them who I voted for (especially in Europe). I'm one for shock value I guess, but it's sweet to know that my vote wasn't the only one.
Posted by: Erin at December 07, 2004 07:42 AM (O9YM0)
2
I wish Stein had a blog.
Posted by: John at December 07, 2004 07:45 AM (+Ysxp)
3
Sarah,
Actually, the part you quoted is what I wrote. Not what Stein wrote.
Posted by: James Hudnall at December 07, 2004 12:31 PM (FV8Tp)
4
Oh, sorry Hud. I didn't realize how confusing that
he and
he was...I meant you, since I said it after the via Hud thing. Whoops.
Posted by: Sarah at December 07, 2004 02:26 PM (ZE4ns)
5
I am a leftie in Texas. I have had a number of friends whose cars were vandalized because they sported left leaning bumper stickers - windshield wipers torn off, "Die Commie Faggot" scratched into the hood, etc. I don't put any bumper stickers on my car. My current job is safe, but I have had jobs where I certainly had to very circumspect about saying anything about politics for fear of losing my job, especially after one co-worker was canned the day after they had a political debate with their manager. Also, don't forget the woman who was fired for having a Kerry bumper sticker:
http://www.decaturdaily.com/decaturdaily/news/040912/sticker.shtml
Posted by: Gno Wan at December 07, 2004 05:51 PM (Fn679)
6
Ben Stein is a true Renaissance man...law, economic, politics, comedy, acting, speaking, television...
Posted by: david at December 08, 2004 01:39 AM (ZVhuO)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
December 05, 2004
CLOSE CALL
Bunker's son nearly got shot yesterday. No, not the Marine. Not the Soldier either.
The cop. That's why I don't waste time worrying about whether my husband could die in Iraq; non-Soldiers are just as mortal. And most of them don't spend life in IBA and an M1A1.
Posted by: Sarah at
03:13 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 52 words, total size 1 kb.
December 03, 2004
AMERICA ON STEROIDS
Lots of my friends here are red-state voters who come from coastal blue states. They sort of can't figure out why I want our next duty station to be Texas. Lo and behold,
Vinod says it better than I could. A blog post in praise of Texas that includes references to 1)
Lila and 2) groking: could it get any cooler than that?
Posted by: Sarah at
07:24 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 69 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Texas IS the promised land and we are even tolerant of foreigners. Unfortunantly, it has been my experience that when you WANT to go somewhere Uncle Sugar sends you someplace else entirely...like the freakin' wasteland of New England...Good luck with that:}
Posted by: Ed at December 03, 2004 11:36 AM (PJ4Iq)
2
Sarah, y'all would be more than welcome to move to Texas. One problem, though. If you move here, I'll need to change my blog name to "TexasSecondBestGrok."
I loved the linked article; says what I've long thought about Texas.
Posted by: JohnL at December 03, 2004 03:23 PM (YVul2)
3
You (y'all) would certainly be welcome here in Texas! Fort Hood I'm guessing?
The state tourism board ran a campaign with the slogan "Texas: It's like a whole other country", I think that sums up the way a lot of us feel. In a good way.
Posted by: Jack Grey at December 04, 2004 05:01 AM (Jq8H8)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
December 02, 2004
SOME LINKS
Man, did I get sucked into
this comments section!
And if there's one thing I can say about Ann Coulter, it's that she sure knows how to make me laugh:
But Bush nominates a brilliant geopolitical thinker who happens to be black and female and all of a sudden she's Butterfly McQueen, who don't know nothin' 'bout birthin' no Middle Eastern democracies.
Posted by: Sarah at
04:56 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 66 words, total size 1 kb.
64kb generated in CPU 0.0424, elapsed 0.1276 seconds.
53 queries taking 0.1154 seconds, 209 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.