December 30, 2009

TRANSPARENCY

From the administration that pledged total transparency:

The Obama administration’s handling of the Christmas Day terror plot has been “schizophrenic” says [Rep. Peter King]. “It’s reflective of their handling of other incidents. They still haven’t given us any information on Fort Hood. Even with the gate crashers, they’ve refused to give us on information on communications between the White House social secretary and the Secret Service. They’re giving us nothing and Democrats in Congress are very reluctant to have any meaningful investigations.” Politics, not national security, is driving these decisions, says King. “They’re holding back because they don’t want to share embarrassing material.”

Posted by: Sarah at 09:15 AM | Comments (3) | Add Comment
Post contains 102 words, total size 1 kb.

1 The O administration *is* transparent. We can see right through it. But millions remain blind.

Posted by: Amritas at December 30, 2009 10:33 AM (Dr0JC)

2 OTOH, the administration is so opaque that even an MSM reporter can't see through it: http://www.dianawest.net/Home/tabid/36/EntryId/1186/White-House-Stonewalling-on-Obamas-Executive-Order-Unleashing-Interpol.aspx http://michellemalkin.com/2009/12/29/the-interpol-question/

Posted by: Amritas at December 30, 2009 12:33 PM (J1wk+)

3 If that categorize as a Secret Service, so that means no transparency, of course. What do you expect from a Secret Service? kjghjk.Transparent to the public and press? Dream on man. The O's are hiding behind the word "Secret Ops". All his policy is Secret Operation, so there are no need for the public to know about it.

Posted by: Shandra at January 18, 2010 12:55 AM (vOByA)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
41kb generated in CPU 0.0123, elapsed 0.0652 seconds.
48 queries taking 0.0568 seconds, 146 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.

Search Thingy