March 30, 2004
UNFAIR
No time to blog, but I was flipping through the paper at work this morning, and
an editorial caught my eye; naturally it's on what a horrible man President Bush is. There was one paragraph that finally made me say
ein Minuten bitte:
When he focuses on human embryos, he speaks of his obligation to foster and encourage respect for life, but when respect for human life gets in the way of his wish to strike back at those he considers enemies of the United States, he is willing to bring about the deaths of thousands of innocent human beings. These are not the actions of a person of principle.
That's unfair. We all have conflicting values that depend heavily on the situation. I don't support indiscriminate killing, but I do support taking a life under certain circumstances. That sure doesn't mean I lack principles, it just means that my principles can't be summed up and contrasted in one small paragraph. It's completely unfair to write an editorial saying the President has a "meandering moral compass" when everyone has nuances in their value system.
MORE:
My ein Minuten bitte has caused some wrinkled brows. No, it's not proper German; it's a line from Eddie Izzard's stand-up routine about Martin Luther. We use it a lot in our house here, as well as the Simpsons psuedo-German quote Das Phone ist eine nuisance phone! and the Family Guy's Du werdest eine Krankenschwester brauchen!
We love fake German.
Posted by: Sarah at
04:17 AM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
Post contains 247 words, total size 2 kb.
1
This is something I agree with completely. Anyone who doesn't have conflicting values within their own lives are either so good that God is about to assume them bodily into heaven, or they are absolute evil incarnate.
Posted by: NightHawk at March 30, 2004 09:19 AM (5GWma)
2
I take it you saw the editorial in the paper, Googled it, and found a copy at Common Dreams? Or do you start off every morning with Common Dreams?
Never been there, and don't want to start now. The name sounds so Leftist - the idea of a collective sharing einen Traum (dream). Ein Traum, eine MentaLLLität, eine Gehirnzelle (brain cell)!
Posted by: Amritas at March 30, 2004 10:47 AM (kRnVN)
3
Yep, googled it. I tried to go directly to the LA Times, but their page was such a mess that I gave up and went elsewhere. No "common dreams" for me...the thought weirds me out while reading 1984 and Brave New World!
Posted by: Sarah at March 30, 2004 11:09 AM (VwSPl)
4
Einem Augenblick bitte! (Is that right?)
It's not just unfair, it's total bullshit. Bush does everything possible to avoid the deaths of innocents. And other civilians. While still getting the job done.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at March 30, 2004 11:22 AM (+S1Ft)
5
I think it's
"einen" mit dem Akkusativ.
It's not just Bush - it's the US military as a whole which "does everything possible to avoid the deaths of innocents". If there were a massacre, everyone would know about it. But there is no Iraqi My Lai.
Posted by: Amritas at March 30, 2004 07:33 PM (dpay0)
6
LA Times (all the way in Germany? - wow!) ... registration ... grumble ... grumble ... on those occasions when I see LAT articles (usually reprinted in the Hawaii papers) I try to Google them so I can copy, paste, and link them.
"Everyone has nuances in their value system"? And we're the ones being accused of
simplisme?(Simplismus auf Deutsch?)
I don't see conflicting values here so much as I see situation-sensitive, hierarchical values. It's not a matter of having contradictory values; it's a matter of valuing both X and Y - but ultimately valuing X more given the choice.
(Picked X because if I picked Y, I could be accused of being "sexist"(TM). "That chauvinist pig prefers HIS own chromosome! Gasp!")
Posted by: Amritas at March 30, 2004 07:46 PM (dpay0)
7
Marc - Yep on the U.S. (and allied) military. Heck, they were trying to minimise enemy
military casualties, even at risk to themselves.
My high school german hass accumulated nearly two decades of rust... Ich bin, du bist, er/sie/es ist, wir sind, ihr seid, sie sind... Der/die/das/dem/den/des...
Posted by: Pixy Misa at March 31, 2004 12:46 AM (kOqZ6)
8
"Buenos noches, mein fuhrer!"
Posted by: david at April 01, 2004 02:31 AM (EjwYl)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
March 16, 2004
GO, AL
I told my mom last night about how Oda Mae's vote is going to cancel out
my co-worker's vote in the November election, and apparently my mom is going to be doing some cancelling-out of her own. Today is the Illinois primary, where my mother will be voting Al Sharpton. Hysterical. If Democrats wanna play anyone-but-Bush, then my mama will give them a taste of anyone-but-Kerry. What a little saboteur...
Posted by: Sarah at
02:13 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 74 words, total size 1 kb.
1
In our Texas primary I went to vote and they asked me which party. I told them "Libertarian," and they just looked at me funny. So, I took a Republican ballot. Afterwards, I wished I had taken the Democratic ballot just to be able to vote for Al.
Posted by: Mike at March 16, 2004 12:50 PM (cFRpq)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
March 15, 2004
NO DVDS FOR KERRY
I was thinking about the annoying conversation between my
co-workers as I was cooking my delicious
cow-on-a-bun for dinner. I keep my mouth shut all the time at work. Despite the fact that we're on a freakin' military post and people around here should value and respect the USA, I never talk about politics or things that I think aren't good office talk. I respect my German co-worker and don't want to make a fuss. But do they even consider for a moment that maybe I'm not turning cartwheels at the thought of John Kerry? Nope. Completely unprovoked, out of the stinkin' blue, my officemate says, "Do you think Bush already has Bin Ladin?" Immediately, without taking a breath, I answered with a firm "no." To which the other officemate supplied a "yes." I looked at both of them and said, "You can't really be serious?" and they said that they were, that they
had heard that this might be true. They
heard it, like it's on the same level as rumors about whether Johnny made out with Susie over the weekend or whether we're getting a Subway in the old Bookmark building here on post. I looked at the American co-worker and said, "Do you really have such little faith in your own government?" and he said, "I do if Bush is in charge." And that was the end of the conversation.
I have never brought up politics in our office, and I've made it a point not to say anything unless asked a direct question, but they have to be warming up to the idea that I'm not a Bush-hater. I already know that they are both extreme Bush-haters; in fact, my one co-worker who is a German with American citizenship through marriage, and who has never lived in the US, is going to register to vote for her very first time ever just so she can vote against Bush. (That really pisses me off.) I am just waiting for the day that someone asks me outright who I'm voting for.
So while I was cooking my beef, I started thinking about how many DVDs you'd have to offer me to vote for Kerry. The number is much much higher than how many I'd give to talk to my husband. I can safely say that if someone offered me $100 to vote for Kerry this year, I would turn it down. So I raised the bar in my mind: would I take $1000 to vote for Kerry? In my janky little part-time job, I make roughly $1000 per month (oh god that's ridiculous for someone with a Masters Degree.) Would I give up the chance for an extra month's pay to vote Kerry? You bet your sweet bippy. I would sacrifice one month's pay to have an extra four years of President Bush instead of Kerry.
Wait til my co-workers hear that one.
Posted by: Sarah at
03:07 PM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 493 words, total size 3 kb.
1
Don't worry, Sarah, I'm registering for the first time to vote in a Presidential election so I can vote for BUSH!! I'll cancel her out for you.
Posted by: Oda Mae at March 15, 2004 05:07 PM (Wdo4K)
2
About ten trillion dollars is right, I think. Then you could do the job that Kerry won't.
Or buy a
lot of DVDs...
Posted by: Pixy Misa at March 15, 2004 09:10 PM (+S1Ft)
3
I'm reminded by something my cranky but sharp as a tack granny always said--- you can respect other people's opinions without giving up your own dignity. Seems to me that there's little commednable in biting back your tongue for the sake of making nice in a public environement (i.e. work). Politics is a public realm as it is, voicing your opinion among the opinions of others is what politics is all about. If other people invade your space by making assumptions and assume alliances that aren't there and you don't call them up on it, you've only yourself to blame. It isn't their fault that you don't say your piece and go home fuming. It's yours. The key is to be both respectful of them and yourself. You do yourself a grave disservice by keeping silent. Speak up.
Posted by: Crystal at March 15, 2004 09:35 PM (s6c4t)
4
Crystal, that's beautiful.
Oh, and, Sarah, 1,000 bucks?! Go for it! If that's what it takes, we'll chip in!
Posted by: Tuning Spork at March 16, 2004 12:38 AM (PucHz)
5
I'd give up a years pay, if not more.
Also, I've convinced two co-workers, as well as a childhood friend, all whom have never voted, to register this year.
I hope they vote for Bush, and I talk to them about politics when they ask, but they haven't said who they'd vote for.
Posted by: Blueshift at March 16, 2004 05:51 AM (crTpS)
6
You want to get your point across without having to say an actual word? Just show your co-workers
this advertisement. They'll be shocked.
Posted by: CavalierX at March 16, 2004 04:28 PM (R9DSb)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
March 10, 2004
IRONY
In a weird twist of irony, my dislike of Kerry is reaching bushian proportions. The thought of Kerry becoming president both scares and repulses me, which I imagine Bush does for many other people. But at least I can point to concrete reasons why I vehemently oppose Kerry the Waffler for president, like this account of
Kerry supporting unilateralism in Iraq...back in 1997 before Hitler, I mean Bush, was at the wheel. For pete's sake, Kerry, this is the age of the internet. It's so easy to find what you said before; you'd better start being consistent.
Posted by: Sarah at
02:38 AM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
Post contains 99 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Like any *intelligent* (i.e., Leftist) person, Kerry is flexible and open to change. That trait is a must if one is to swallow revisionist history: e.g., Vietnam as stage for war heroics one moment and AmeriKKKan hell zone the next. It's the rigid Rightists who are dangerous, not John Fluid Kerry, capable of adapting to anything, including Iranian nukes. Besides, unilateralism under Clinton would be small r-right by defintion. Anything is justified as long as it is branded with the sacred letter "D."
Posted by: Amritas at March 10, 2004 03:31 AM (Qdsoq)
2
Kerry on his own war record:
"However, I did take part in free-fire zones, I did take part in harassment and interdiction fire, I did take part in search-and-destroy missions in which the houses of noncombatants were burned to the ground. And all of these acts, I find out later on, are contrary to the Hague and Geneva conventions and to the laws of warfare. So in that sense, anybody who took part in those, if you carry out the application of the Nuremberg Principles, is in fact guilty."
Source: http://qando.net/archives/002186.htm
So is he a hero or a war criminal?
Posted by: Amritas at March 10, 2004 03:35 AM (Qdsoq)
3
This is what annoys me about him:
And all of these acts, I find out later on, are contrary to the Hague and Geneva conventions and to the laws of warfare.
Everyone in the military has this stuff drilled into them in basic training. Maybe he slept through those classes.
Posted by: Mike at March 10, 2004 07:00 AM (cFRpq)
4
The thing that should upset you the most as a Military wife is how he talked about the military when he returned from Vietnam.
He almost single handedly is responsible for the hatred that many hippies had for soldiers in Vietnam calling them baby killers and the such.
Posted by: Tom at March 10, 2004 11:05 AM (+1ZQW)
5
Oh, you are just a mean lying ultra-conservative right winger. I've never said the things that you said I said.
Posted by: JFwordK at March 10, 2004 11:12 PM (JmmCS)
6
Oh my, JFwordK, such venom! I happen to be very close to this blogger, and people like you scare me! Atleast Bush is honest and truthful, whether people like him or not; he stands up for his principles. From what I see of Kerry, he's just out there saying whatever he chooses to say just to get the votes, and to me he has a mean streak! And guess what, I'm a registered Democrat!!! Kerry will not get my vote.
Posted by: Nancy at March 10, 2004 11:47 PM (boDJK)
7
I identify completely with your comparison of your dislike for Kerry with the left's hatred of Bush. Are we all guilty of the same crime?
But really, I don't cast that dislike of Kerry on to other Democratic candidates. Although I dislike Sharpton, Kucinich, and Dean for different reasons, I have some degree of respect for them insofar as they seem to be honest repesentatives of themselves, at least.
Dislike of Kerry on my part is driven by his abandoning of command in time of war, his betrayal of his fellow veterans while that war was ongoing, his voting history through his Senatorial career, and his contemptable behavior on the current campaign trail.
The left's hatred of Bush is "he's a big fat smirking chimp liar!" and "It's all about the oil!"
Equivalency?
Posted by: Greyhawk at March 11, 2004 08:17 PM (O1mAk)
8
"Are we all guilty of the same crime?"
Yes, though methods and motives differ.
I agree with you about respecting the other Democrat candidates. Kucinich in particular has always struck me as sincere. But the presidency requires a lot more than that.
And Kerry doesn't even that on his side. I'd respect him more if he were consistent, or if he changed his mind and explained himself. Maybe he IS doing the latter, but frankly his behavior has been so contemptible that I don't really care to research his attempts at self-defense, if any.
Posted by: Amritas at March 12, 2004 03:50 AM (Mo2jT)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
March 04, 2004
OK
OK,
Lileks, OK. I won't sit this one out. You're right.
Posted by: Sarah at
03:14 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 13 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Today the news comments are about a new Bush ad showing the WTC towers burning. Kerry doesn't like it because "It politicizes 9/11."
Posted by: Mike at March 04, 2004 07:40 AM (cFRpq)
2
Kerry probably doesn't like the ad because it doesn't feature HIM. After all, he played a role in the Bush war machine (shhhh!):
"Dealt the card of a horrific act of terrorism on American soil, Bush made decisions and took actions that are now questioned by many.
"Kerry endorsed those decisions with his votes in the Senate, from the USA Patriot Act to war with Iraq."
- Joan Vennochi, Boston Globe
http://www.boston.com/news/globe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2004/03/03/challenge_is_to_rise_above_ambition/
Posted by: Amritas at March 04, 2004 07:55 AM (g4OZS)
Posted by: casino at August 30, 2005 06:18 PM (DKl3T)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
March 03, 2004
HONESTY
President Bush and Chancellor Schroeder just met, and
David compares the President's greeting from 2001 to this significantly colder recent one. He also found a shockingly honest interview with David Frum. My favorite exchange:
Frum: I have studied the European press. We had exactly three good days after the 11 of September.
Interviewer: And shouldnÂ’t you ask yourself why it is so?
Frum: No, the Europeans should ask themselves that. You were good at crying at the graves of the dead Americans. But when it came down to us Americas feeling threatened by Islamic fanatics, then as now, that was already too much starting in December 2001. And then these unspeakable books turned up on the bestseller lists in France and Germany, these conspiracy theories surrounding the 11 of September. That says quite a lot.
Posted by: Sarah at
03:35 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 137 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Exactly right. The Left want us to repair relations with Europe. I think Europe should be trying to repair relations with us.
Posted by: Mike at March 03, 2004 10:29 AM (cFRpq)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
63kb generated in CPU 0.0623, elapsed 0.1815 seconds.
52 queries taking 0.1672 seconds, 178 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.