November 25, 2004
COWBOY
I'm also thankful for
cowboys.
Posted by: Sarah at
03:17 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 7 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Thanks, that was great!
Posted by: Oda Mae at November 25, 2004 03:32 AM (ZpuzV)
2
Great Link. I used to hang out at a bar called Duke's in South Dakota with the gal that has now been my wife for twenty years. They had pictures of John Wayne everywhere. I really liked that place and we were just talking about it over Thanksgiving dinner. Happy Thanksgiving and I hope your husband is home safe and soon.
JD
Posted by: JD( Infantryman in the past) at November 25, 2004 05:03 PM (QCTL2)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
November 21, 2004
VIRTUES
Reason #__ why I think President Bush is a good and decent man.
Posted by: Sarah at
02:05 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 15 words, total size 1 kb.
1
What a guy.
Yeah...and I gotta tell you, I feel doubly blessed - his brother is my governor. :-)
Posted by: Tammi at November 21, 2004 09:04 AM (UOdfZ)
2
You must be joking. THAT'S the reason you think he's a good and decent man? Because he went back into the crowd to help the man who's supposed to be watching out for HIM?
OF COURSE he's going to pull the guy out of the crowd. It's a no-brainer as to why he would do such a thing. Furthermore, I think ANY decent person would do the same thing.
I cannot believe how much press this story is getting. It boggles the mind.
Posted by: . at November 22, 2004 01:19 AM (4kcrg)
3
Ummm.
It's just ONE of the reasons. ("Reason #___")
It get's play because a lot of people wouldn't have noticed, let alone get back in there and settle it.
It may be a no brainer to some of us, but not everyone. You're right any DECENT person would. That would be the point.
Posted by: Tammi at November 22, 2004 07:42 AM (UOdfZ)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
November 20, 2004
HE WAS RIGHT
Only history can judge a
president...
Posted by: Sarah at
02:49 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 12 words, total size 1 kb.
November 08, 2004
FRUSTRATION
I've been getting more and more fed up with all the "reasons" President Bush won the election. Everyone who voted for him was supposedly a knuckle-dragging mouthbreather who only put down his Bible and klan robe long enough to vote for a chimp. I've been getting really irritated this week.
And then I read Deskmerc. Exactly.
Posted by: Sarah at
04:59 PM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
Post contains 58 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Wow. I can sympathize. I myself am sick to my teeth of reading about all the reasons that Kerry lost. I'm sick of hearing high profile Republicans gloat in a manner most unbecoming over their win, and I'm especially tired of being portrayed as an unpatriotic tree-hugging, welfare-gettin', morally bankrupt leech on the ass of American society.
Let's face it: stereotypes suck.
Posted by: . at November 09, 2004 02:34 AM (4kcrg)
2
People need to chill out. i watched a media symposium on CSPAN tonight. Some of the audience questions were very troubling. There is real fear out there, irrational fear, that religious zealots are going to turn this country into a Christian Iran. i don't understand it, that's never going to happen. But i'm afraid of the anti-religious backlash that is probably going to result from this kind of mass hysteria, which is being fueled by the media.
Posted by: annika at November 09, 2004 03:42 AM (zAT/T)
3
The more that they sink their head in the sand, and believe that it was fundamentalist crusaiding christians that won the elections, the less they are going to understand the shift in this country, and the more marginalized they will become.
It's not our job to fix our opponents, let them sink themselves.
Posted by: John at November 09, 2004 07:33 AM (crTpS)
4
I feel your pain. Here is a little nugget of truth to consider the next time someone says Bush supporters are idiots.
Gallup final pre-election poll data show that...
58% of college graduates(no postgrad)voted Bush
47% of postgrads voted Bush
56% of those with some college voted Bush
Link
-D
Posted by: Don at November 09, 2004 12:17 PM (zvtzh)
5
Oh do you have to throw something as dirty as statistics at us? I mean really now, you shouldn't assume that just because someone's graduated from college that they're necessarily intelligent. I know plenty of morons with degrees.
Posted by: . at November 09, 2004 01:50 PM (4kcrg)
6
And plenty of morons with graduate degrees. Most of them teach.
Posted by: Mike at November 09, 2004 01:58 PM (MqNKC)
7
I'm one of those knuckle-draggin', Bible-thumpin' Neanderthal Protestant Evangelical Fundamentalists what thunks that all you-uns should be in church at least three times a week, or you will all be doomed. Of course, never miss any of the revival meetings, or else. My wife is barefoot and pregnant with our 48th child, whose wi ar homskulin.
OK. Enough sarcasm. Seriously, surfing all the epithets that have been cast at all of us who attend on at least a weekly--or more often--basis a local Methodist, Baptist, Presbyterian, Nazarine, Assembly, Full Gospel, &c, &c, &c church, has me realizing that Jesus Himself couldn't "unite" this country.
At the risk of being burned for heresy, I hold that there are indeed limits to the capabilities of my Southern Baptist God: There are those whom He cannot change, for they will to hate. Listening to Lawrence O'Donnell, Bill Mahr, and others (indeed, even Carl Bernstein on Scarborough) makes me wonder what kind of nation my granddaughter will grow up in. Will those "Creator" phrases in our Declaration of Independance be expunged from all our school textbooks, Will the historical record of our founding fathers' individual and corporate faith be found to be unconstitutional to discuss in a classroom setting (oh, wait--ask any Am. Gov. teacher today, and he (or she) will unequivocately state that a de facto ban already exists, by virtue of the threat of litigation)?
And the hypocracy of the left! When Clinton (mis)quoted St. Paul's first letter to the churches in Corinth, Greece ("seared--seared in my memory" are these words from his '92 nomination acceptance speech: "The Scriptures say, 'eye has not seen, ear has not heard, neither has it entered into the mind of man [here he mis-quotes] what we can build'"), when Barak Obama gets up in the 2004 Democratic Convention and says, "Our God is an awesome God!" (title of a popular Christian chorus), Kerry getting up and "preaching" in pulpits of various Baptist (and other denominations) churches (followed by, from the pulpit, explicit endorsements by those churches' pastors of Kerry--in direct contravention of the IRS law LBJ got passed)--but if GW paraphrases the Declaration ("freedom is a gift from the Almighty"), and all the Pavlovian knee-jerks hit the airwaves. Go figure.
And please, another thing: Nobody. N.O.B.O.D.Y. in the religious right, wacko, 6,000 year-old creationist/Armageddon/Ark of the Covenant hidden under the al-Aqsa mosque, new temple being built in Jerusalem/Apocalypse Bible-thumping community ever--not never no how--brought up the gay marriage issue. NONE OF US DID. So don't blame us. WE did not force the Taxachusetts Supreme Judicial Court to force Kerry's state--WE did not issue illegal (under California state law) marriage licenses. So don't blame us. It ain't our fault. We were willing to live and let live.
Forgive me for being so ragged out. But I have become weary. Weary of ALWAYS being required to justify my very existance in this nation which, recalling ALL the organic founding documents, once acknowledged the existence of a Being Who, through "Divine Providence", made us a great nation. But we are going to throw it all away, and make ourselves a clone of Old Europe (and of France--no scarves or crucifixes, you remember).
You two keep having a good time. I'll keep praying for your safety.
Jim
Posted by: Jim Shawley at November 10, 2004 12:03 AM (/8BLK)
8
OOPS! hypocrisy. -5pts, spelling. Shows that we evangelicals really are ignorant.
Posted by: Jim Shawley at November 10, 2004 12:06 AM (/8BLK)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
November 03, 2004
UNVEILING
My icing skills have definitely improved since
the last cake -- it helps when you read the instructions and you make frosting instead of drizzle -- so this one is actually legible.

I decided to make a pro-Bush instead of an anti-Kerry cake when I saw how quickly Kerry conceded. I respect him for not dragging it out, and I actually feel sorry for him. He was a man who geared his whole life towards running for president one day, and I feel sorry for him that his dream never materialized. I'm relieved he's not our President, but I feel and respect his disappointment.
Arafat's fair game though.
Posted by: Sarah at
03:05 PM
| Comments (14)
| Add Comment
Post contains 110 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I'm afraid I don't feel the least bit sorry for Kerry. All his life, he wanted to be President -- that's true. But he didn't want to be President because he loved America as it
is... he wanted to be President because he thought he had the right to change it into something he thought it
should be. Thankfully, enough people saw through his media-aided sidestepping of every issue that was important to them, and rejected him.
Posted by: CavalierX at November 03, 2004 06:38 PM (sA6XT)
2
That's a pretty noble sentiment, Sarah.
I can also agree with you on another point: while I can understand Kerry's disappointment, I really can't wait for Arafat to meet his maker.
Posted by: S at November 03, 2004 07:46 PM (swRUK)
3
Ironically enough - the re-election of Bush and the death off Arafat will likely mean a Palestinian state before Bush leaves office.
How about this for icing on Sarah's cake?
A democratic government in Afghanistan, Iraq, and the establishment of permanent peace between Israel and Palestinians resulting in a Nobel Peace Prize for W!
Eat your heart out Clinton! LOL! :-)
Posted by: Tanker Schreiber at November 03, 2004 08:44 PM (tMBPA)
4
Can we not get past the bickering now?? It is going to take both sides reaching out which I feel both candidates did today. There are 48% of the votes who felt Kerry had what it took. It is obvious that many who come here do not feel that way. But as a once Kerry supporter, I will now support this President in the next 4 years. But please let's don't start the Kerry bashing again. Kerry did not drag this election out but conceded to Bush. If Bush can do everything he said over the campaign then many will be happy.
Posted by: ME at November 03, 2004 10:13 PM (W5nSP)
5
Better reason not to be anti-Kerry: He's old news. Let's move on, we have a war to win!
Posted by: David Boxenhorn at November 04, 2004 05:43 AM (BPc6m)
6
Whats the deal with both sides reaching out? Forgettaboutit! GW tried that the first time and was skewered by the Democrats. I'd say the loser needs to do the reaching out as long as the winner is gracious about it. I see no signs of the losers doing this. They already are saying that GW did not win the election with a mandate. They are still saying Bush is stooopid. I say it's time for the Republicans to ram thru as much as they can while they have the opportunity because that's exactly what the Democrats would do if the situation were reversed. BTW - today is the official DAY OF GLOATING for Republicans. We get one day to do this and then it's get to work.
Posted by: Toni at November 04, 2004 09:00 AM (SHqVu)
7
Toni is right. Dubya did lots of reaching out and had his hand slapped.
Time for the other side to try reaching out. I just hope they wipe their hands, first.
Posted by: Mike at November 04, 2004 09:56 AM (MqNKC)
8
I'd say the center has shifted towards the republicans. The dems only hope is to follow the center, as Clinton did. If they do not, the reps will rule for quite a while.
Posted by: John at November 04, 2004 01:14 PM (+Ysxp)
9
The title of your blog belies your level of intelligence. Change the title of your blog or grow some intelligence.
Your husband was in Iraq and you still voted for Bush...what sort of idiot are you?
Posted by: Dave Buster at November 04, 2004 02:31 PM (xa1gV)
10
Dave, grow up. Sarah is both well-informed and intelligent. She knows exactly what's important. That's why she voted for Bush.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at November 04, 2004 02:56 PM (+S1Ft)
11
Buster,
Your assumptions about Sarah's intelligence only serve to point out that you have assumed something, not that what you have assumed is true.
Posted by: John at November 04, 2004 03:53 PM (+Ysxp)
12
Dave -
Many of us are willing to make sacrifices if we are doing something that we believe is important.
I voted for W, even though I'm in the military and it would mean being away from my family and friends - even dying. I know you find it hard to believe, but I do believe in what we are doing in Iraq.
And I would thank you not to make any comments like Michael Moore regarding the "stupid, trigger-pullers forced into the military." I'm a former National Merit scholar, college graduate and VOLUNTEER in the US military.
Posted by: S at November 04, 2004 07:40 PM (swRUK)
13
You can be intelligent, well-informed, and still wrong.
Those qualities are not mutually exclusive.
"While our troops go out to defend our country, it is incumbent upon us to make the country worth defending."
Which includes removing idiots from power.
Posted by: dave buster at November 05, 2004 03:52 PM (xa1gV)
14
"..removing idiots from power."
Which is why we didn't vote Kerry into office.
So, are you now saying that Sarah is intelligent, well-informed, and wrong?
Please cite examples.
Posted by: John at November 08, 2004 02:20 AM (crTpS)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
CAKE SOON
Right now New Mexico has counted 94% of the votes, and Bush is sitting at 52%.
I'm preheating the oven...
Posted by: Sarah at
03:43 AM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
Post contains 24 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Hold off on the cake, Kerry/Edwards just announced that the are going to "count all the votes in Ohio".
Posted by: Pamela at November 03, 2004 03:48 AM (AOFgp)
2
Iowa, NM, and Nevada are all going for Bush. On top of Ohio, and all the rest that are called at this hour, bush looks to score 286 EV.
4 More Years.
I want cake.
Posted by: John at November 03, 2004 04:30 AM (crTpS)
3
Go ahead and bake that cake. The Kerry Whiners are going to drag this out a while. No Tereaaaza in the White House! There is a GOD and he is awesome.
Now go back to your husband. God bless you both.
Williams Family
Posted by: williams family at November 03, 2004 04:49 AM (4MKps)
4
Update: I want cake. All of Kerry/Edwards histrionics are not going to change things. The provisional votes in Ohio will not be enough. Four more years. Hoorah.
I hope you and your husband have a wonderful time together. God bless and keep you both.
Posted by: Pamela at November 03, 2004 10:22 AM (AOFgp)
5
The media is in Kerry's camp moreso than ever now. Make no mistake, the media would love an extended recount. It's all about the viewers for them, the more controversy, the more they are watched. This is advantageous to Kerry, and you must understand that Kerry's team knows this. They don't even have to collude to understand this about each other.
How ugly can this become?
Posted by: John at November 03, 2004 11:06 AM (+Ysxp)
6
Kerry has conceeded, already called Bush.
Posted by: John at November 03, 2004 12:14 PM (+Ysxp)
7
You bake that cake, frost it and have yourselve a nice serving.
It's over.
Bush wins.
Thank Goodness.
Now - enjoy the rest of your time w/Hubby.
Posted by: Tammi at November 03, 2004 01:30 PM (UOdfZ)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
November 02, 2004
BLISS
Yes, James, I did have the
unbalanced electric can opener last week. But my husband has so wonderfully distracted me that I actually said, "What happens tomorrow?" when he asked me last night if I was nervous. It feels good to have more important things to think about, like squeezing the life out of Day Four.
Tonight will come and go, and there may or may not be cake afterward, but regardless of what happens, the husband and I will still have Day Five together. Right now, that's a big comfort.
Posted by: Sarah at
03:15 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 93 words, total size 1 kb.
1
As I've said, I'm so glad he's home for a while. I'm so glad ya'll have this time together.
But I'm especially glad he's home RIGHT NOW. This post made me smile. This is EXACTLY what you need (overstating the obvious)
Posted by: Tammi at November 02, 2004 09:46 AM (UOdfZ)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
October 28, 2004
LETTER
Dear President Bush,
I hope you're sleeping better than I have been lately. I bet you're about to OD on Tylenol PM! It doesn't help me much, so I lie in bed trying to think of anything other than 2 Nov, the Cardinals, or my husband. The Cardinals turned out to be a losing battle. I told my friend that it would just figure that the Cards would lose the World Series right when my husband gets home and he'd be in a really foul mood for the whole weekend! Hopefully seeing me after nine months can ease the pain...
I wish I could talk to you. You get such bullcrap thrown your way, and sometimes I worry about you. You won an award for best movie villan, which might be humorous if I weren't so naggingly sure that those people actually believe it. You get drawn as everything from Hitler to a special needs child, and if I feel the sting, I know you must too.
I just wish you could know that some of us out there really do care about you. We want you to win, because we think you've been a great leader in trying times. We want an aggressive leader who does what's right for the US and we've been behind you since 9/11. We're afraid of what happens if you don't win, but we're also slightly afraid of what happens if you do. There are some who have called for riots, lawsuits, and even for your assassination.
If you win, you have four more years of battle with the Islamobarbarians to look forward to. If you lose, you get a good nights sleep and the weight of the world lifted from your shoulders. I wish you could have both, but I'm afraid the former is more important right now. But with you as our president, both of us will sleep peacefully someday.
I wish you luck and tranquility in the coming week.
Get 'er done!!
Sarah
P.S. The Cards may have lost, but Israel may win: is Arafat's death upon us? You know me...I'm baking a cake if it is!
Posted by: Sarah at
01:45 AM
| Comments (12)
| Add Comment
Post contains 358 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Sarah, what a load of crap.
PS Does Bush really know you? Not that I care. But your baking a cake if Arafat dies tells me a lot about you Sarah. I know you are not a good person. Good people don't celebrate when other people die.
Posted by: dc at October 28, 2004 02:04 AM (fLlQ8)
2
Hey, Sarah, thanks for the post. When I worked at the DA's office, the Chief Assistant had a horrible guy on Death Row. He brought in a cake the day of his execution. We were happy to celebrate the grandma killer's demise. Can I come over for the Arafat celebration? Helpful hint: we should NOT invite dc. But as a party game, perhaps we can speculate with colorful language as to what dc stands for and what putting two initials in lower case says about character and self-confidence. Talk to you later! (Oh, and instead of candles, we just flicked the light switch up and down a few times at the magic moment. Hey, that should give the trolls something else to focus on!)
Posted by: Oda Mae at October 28, 2004 02:13 AM (IENgx)
3
This is from Silent Running blog on Arafat.
'This reminds me of the old joke about Hitler. He asked his astrologer when he would die.
"Mein Fuhrer, you will die on a Jewish holiday."
"Which one?"
"Ach, any day you die will be a Jewish Holiday".'
Posted by: Oda Mae at October 28, 2004 02:15 AM (IENgx)
4
Sure, dc, Bush reads my blog. We write emails back and forth all the time. Are you really that dumb? This was supposed to be a
symbolic letter.
And if celebrating the deaths of Uday, Qsay, and Arafat is wrong, then I don't want to be right! Cake for everybody! Except you, dc. You can cry for the old terrorist if you want.
Posted by: Sarah at October 28, 2004 02:43 AM (BfjAH)
5
Sorry dc, but if you look up terrorist in the dictionary, it ought to have Arafat's picture. I'm all for terrorists dying- I don't care if it's caused by the Military, the Courts, or the Grim Reaper- just as long as it happens. Does this make me bad? I can live with that.
Save me some (virtual) cake, Sarah...
Posted by: Jack Grey at October 28, 2004 05:28 AM (Jq8H8)
6
Sarah, let me know when the party is...I'll be right over. And I'll bring the keg.
Posted by: Erin at October 28, 2004 07:22 AM (9P9Bg)
7
Is dc one of those liberals who hopes for the death of any Republican?
Posted by: Mike at October 28, 2004 08:02 AM (MqNKC)
8
And tonite I thought maybe this was a New idea-silly me:
Google for GWbush antichrist and see what YOU get folks!
*****************
Pope fears Bush is antichrist, journalist contends
Brief Article
New Catholic Times,  May 18, 2003 ÂÂ
WASHINGTON DC -- According to freelance journalist Wayne Madsden, "George W Bush's blood lust, his repeated commitment to Christian beliefs and his constant references to 'evil doers,' in the eyes of many devout Catholic leaders, bear all the hallmarks of the one warned about in the Book of Revelations--the anti-Christ."
Madsen, a Washington-based writer and columnist, who often writes for Counterpunch, says that people close to the pope claim that amid these concerns, the pontiff wishes he was younger and in better health to confront the possibility that Bush may represent the person prophesized in Revelations. John Paul II has always believed the world was on the precipice of the final confrontation between Good and Evil as foretold in the New Testament.
Before he became pope, Karol Cardinal Wojtyla said, "We are now standing in the face of the greatest historical confrontation humanity has gone through. I do not think that wide circles of the American society or wide circles of the Christian community realize this fully. We are now facing the final confrontation between the church and the anti-Church, of the Gospel versus the anti-Gospel."
The pope worked tirelessly to convince leaders of nations on the UN Security Council to oppose Bush's war resolution on Iraq. Vatican sources claim they had not seen the pope more animated and determined since he fell ill to Parkinson's Disease. In the end, the pope did convince the leaders of Mexico, Chile, Cameroon and Guinea to oppose the U.S. resolution.
Madsen contends that "Bush is a dangerous right-wing ideologue who couples his political fanaticism with a neo-Christian blood cult."
Posted by: jHc at October 28, 2004 08:10 AM (jqodR)
9
Lesson to be learned from the World Series:
If you are highly motivated and optimistic, nothing can stop you from accomplishing your goals, even when you are down 3 games to the Yankees.
Perhaps John Francois Kerry would like to keep that in mind as he continually roots for defeat in Iraq.
PS - Rooting for the death of a degenerate subhuman terrorist who is responsible for the deaths of American citizens is normal. Only the Eurotrash and terrorists want him to pull through! BTW - doesn't he want to collect on his 72 virgins anyway?
Posted by: Tanker Schreiber at October 28, 2004 09:47 AM (CKdOm)
10
Sarah: thank you for the letter. thank you for your husband. thank you for putting up with idiots like dc.
saturday my boys and i are going to build a giant W for the front yard.
Happy Reunion!
Posted by: chris at October 28, 2004 03:23 PM (zH1Gw)
11
While killing in self-defence may be a sad reality of life, I'm truly disgusted by people who lack the emotional depth to approach the situation with humility.
After all, aren't you glad the insurgents didn't "Bring it on!" to your husband as they've done other 800 some-odd troops since your cock-sure swaggering President goaded them to?
Show some respect for life... that's what separates you from those who don't; be it terrorists, Bush, or even Kerry.
Now flame me as I know you will.
Posted by: Anti Hubris at October 29, 2004 02:56 PM (hHdwk)
12
 Using the name of Christ yet being the enemy of Christ, the Antichrist is a threat to every civilization and every person. Could George Bush be the Antichrist?
By Mike Moore
Having been raised as a Christian, I was taught early that the Antichrist was someone who would come in the name of Christ but be the enemy of Christ. Using that definition, let us examine the proposition that George W. Bush could be the Antichrist. If Jesus Christ was in Bush’s place and he was the president of the United States, would he have taken any of the actions that Bush has taken, including the war in Iraq? In other words, is Bush following the teachings of Christ? “Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them” (Matthew 7:20).
Christ taught us to love one another, especially our enemies (Matthew 5:43-46). Christ said that even the pagans love those who are like themselves, but the true mark of love is to love those that are different from you. Christ taught us to turn the other cheek and to “Do unto others as you would have them do unto you.” Did Bush turn the other cheek when he falsely proclaimed Iraq as a threat? Do you think Bush loves his enemies? Do you think he even loves his friends, since he openly attacks those friends that disagree? Do you think Bush loves Osama bin Laden or Saddam Hussein? If he is a follower of Christ, then he must love them. Have you ever seen love in Bush’s eyes? Have you ever heard Bush talk about loving one’s neighbor? Does he treat the inmates at Guantanamo or the prisoners of Iraq like he would want to be treated? Do you think Christ would say, “You are either for us or against us?” Have Bush’s actions caused there to be more or less love in the world?
The war on Iraq was apparently undertaken because God whispered in BushÂ’s ear that war was the only way to solve the problem. I hate to tell Bush this, but God doesnÂ’t whisper those kinds of things in peopleÂ’s ears. That is the job of the devil! Jesus would never condone a war, as his whole message was to use love, not violence, to solve our problems. War is always a failure of civilization. Bush has set back the civilization of planet Earth. Anyone who wages war in the name of Christ is committing the ultimate Christian sin.
Bush makes a big show of being against abortion in order to advance his political career. His public claim is that abortion is immoral. Yet his actions have resulted in the deaths of thousands of people, most of whom were innocent of any “crime.” And apparently, Bush himself was once involved in an abortion by a former girlfriend. By his actions, Bush has now caused the release of thousands of tons of depleted uranium in Iraq, which will cause birth defects for generations to come. Isn’t that just as immoral as an abortion? And if we judge by the shear number of atrocities, isn’t Bush the most hypocritical champion of human rights?
The Bible says not to lie, and Christ reinforced that message since lying destroys the very fabric of our civilization. As I see it, Bush has told more lies than anyone in the history of our presidency. How can that be Christian? Bush said that he would unite us, yet the country and the world have never been more divided. Other lies have been told about uranium, weapons of mass destruction, the connection between Iraq and 9/11, the economy, and the environment. Is it possible for one to lie in the name of Christ?
Many questions persist. Would Christ have asked that the votes not be counted in Florida? Would Christ send Powell to lie before the UN? Would Christ make campaign ads that continually distort the position of his opponent, just to win an election? Would Christ curse and use the name of God in vain in the White House? Would Christ alienate the rest of the world by unilateral action and my-stick-is-bigger-than-your-stick international politics? Would Christ try to strip Americans of their basic human rights, such as access to an attorney and the right to be presented with formal charges regarding alleged violations of national or international law? Would Christ tell military veterans that he loves them and then cut their benefits? Would Jesus have done any of these actions? I think not.
In summary, Bush pretends to come in the name of Jesus Christ and misses no opportunity to exploit Christ for his own personal political advantage. But in every case, Bush has done the opposite of what Christ taught us to do. This is how Bush has led America and this is the example he has set for “his” people. The people who support Bush’s war in the name of Christ surely share in his sins, and Bush’s sins are magnified by the number of people he has misled in the name of Christ. In many ways, Bush, with his fundamentalist Christian attitude, is no different than the fundamentalist Muslims. All kill in the name of God, and I suspect that God would like to have His name kept out of it entirely.
Is it possible that Bush is the Antichrist? His Antichrist-like actions make one wonder.
Mike Moore is a Marine and Vietnam veteran and today lives in Los Alamos, New Mexico (or Atomic City, as we like to call it.) You can send your comments to Mike at mmoore505@comcast.net
Posted by: mike moore at October 29, 2004 10:35 PM (5omu2)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
October 27, 2004
VIOLENCE
Terrorists hope to defeat Bush through Iraq violence
BAGHDAD — Leaders and supporters of the anti-U.S. insurgency say their attacks in recent weeks have a clear objective: The greater the violence, the greater the chances that President Bush will be defeated on Tuesday and the Americans will go home.
Great. Thanks for giving them hope, Kerry/Edwards.
Posted by: Sarah at
06:14 AM
| Comments (11)
| Add Comment
Post contains 58 words, total size 1 kb.
1
It is not Kerry/Edwards that started this adventure.
It was Bush/Cheney
9/11 was done by Bin Laden. Who has not been caught.
Converting Iraq into a breeding ground for Terrorists is
based on Rumsfeld failed policies.
Where is Bin Laden ?
This president had 3 years to get him
Posted by: Sam Miller at October 27, 2004 06:46 AM (jN9Nx)
2
I don't think the point was to claim that Kedwards started it(although they both went right along with it in word and deed until after the primaries). The point is that Kedwards has been impeding progress and victory at every turn, simply for political gain. It's almost as if they don't seem to realize that the world is paying attention to this race, even as they use the world's opinion of them to bolster their case. If the left would shut up about how terrible the US is and how badly everything is bungled and get behind the president on the world stage there might be less optimism from the terrorists and their state sponsors...
Just my opinion...
Cheers,
M@
Posted by: M@ at October 27, 2004 07:11 AM (gSJFa)
3
That was the point I was trying to make too. Where do you think the insurgents got the idea that we might leave Iraq soon? Certainly not from the "bring it on" candidate, but from the "wrong war" guy.
Posted by: Sarah at October 27, 2004 09:02 AM (WxvAH)
4
If we didn't have the American media telling the terrorist they have 380 tons of the highest grade, most stable explosives known to mankind, used to make nuclear weapons, but can also be used to destroy buildings, blow up airplanes or make roadside bombs they probably would just go home and let our president bush win this war like he wanted to.
Posted by: dc at October 27, 2004 08:16 PM (fLlQ8)
5
Why do they want to defeat Bush/Cheney? The terrorists (as opposed to the native insurgents) must have some end-goal in mind. What would that be? And why would knocking B/C out of office help them?
Thanks for answering.
Posted by: jpe at October 27, 2004 08:41 PM (2Pm+H)
6
Evidently the thinking among these people is not monolithic. Note this paragraph in the story: The most pro-Bush, he said, are the foreign extremists "They prefer Bush, because he's a provocative figure, and the more they can push people to the extreme, the better for their case" It brings to mind the article on the Madrid bombings that you linked to on August 4, 2004 in which an Al Qaeda operative was quoted "We are very keen that Bush does not lose the upcoming elections.Bush's idiocy and religious fanaticism are useful, for they stir the Islamic world to action."
Posted by: Dave at October 27, 2004 09:41 PM (ymDfe)
7
Boy, I ran that post all together. Hope it can be sorted out. I'm just trying to point out that there is as much disagreement among them as there is among us, and thank god they can't vote anyway.
Posted by: Dave at October 27, 2004 09:50 PM (ymDfe)
8
Boy, I ran that post all together. Hope it can be sorted out.
No, I think that what you said made eminent sense. To flesh out your post, I'd imagine that there would be quite different preferences between the native Iraqi insurgents and the foreign terrorists. The former may be better off with Bush, since he's arguably more steadfast than Kerry; the latter, whose goal is purportedly a new pan-arab caliphate, and who depend on ideological indoctrination, are arguably assisted in their goal by Bush's explicitly ideological Middle East project.
Posted by: jpe at October 27, 2004 11:29 PM (2Pm+H)
9
A defeat for Bush/Cheney will be seen in the Middle East as a defeat for the policy of "taking the fight to the terrorists" as well as a defeat for the "no difference between terrorists and those that harbor/support terrorists". I'm not saying that's an accurate analysis, but I guarantee you that's how the editorials will read in Al-Hayat and the rest of the ME press.
Kerry and the democrats could have laid out a case that the war was right but could have been handled differently- something a Lieberman would have done- but that's not the path they chose. Instead, I'm afraid, Kerry's tactics often have had the effect of telling the terrorists that "hope is on the way". I don't think that it was intentional, just what you get when you'll say anything to try to win. I couldn't be more disgusted with his campaign, but if he wins (and I pray not) I'll shut-up and soldier, sailor.
And Sam, Bin Laden's Dead. On the remote chance that he's not, I don't see how his ego could keep him from popping up in a video with a current NYT just to say "Hi" before the election... so unless he does, I'd say that settles it. (and no, I can't "prove" it, but we sure haven't seen him much lately...)
Posted by: Jack Grey at October 28, 2004 05:08 AM (Jq8H8)
10
And Sam, Bin Laden's Dead.
Guess you know better than the US government then.
Posted by: Sadly, No! at October 28, 2004 07:56 AM (Q0kxM)
11
possible answers for jpe
I had to double check this to make sure it wasn't a story from The Onion, but it's not. A terrorist group, claiming links with al Qaida, called Abu Hafs al-Masri Brigades stated that it supported President Bush in his reelection campaign and would prefer him to win in November rather than the Democratic candidate John Kerry. They state that it was not possible to find a leader "more foolish than you (Bush), who deals with matters by force rather than with wisdom." In comments addressed to Bush, the group said: "Kerry will kill our nation while it sleeps because he and the Democrats have the cunning to embellish blasphemy and present it to the Arab and Muslim nation as civilization. Because of this we desire you (Bush) to be elected."
**********************************
Clearly, they want to endorse Bush so that he will win...
Or they want to fool us by pretending to endorse Bush so that Kerry will win!
Or they know that we will assume that they are falsely endorsing Bush so that Kerry will win and thus we will vote for Bush, as they want!
Or they assume that we will come to the above conclusion, thus voting for Kerry, JUST AS THEY WANT!
I say let's boycott the election, conpletely destroying al Qaeda's plans!
Unless they think we will come to that conclusion and they want us to not vote, in which case we should...
**********************
In this sense, some of Bush's rhetoric has been interpreted both by some of Bush's more rabid supporters and islamic extremists as being in favor of destruction of "Islamofascists" and the occupation and westernizing of Muslim civilization. As a consequence, I can see how some Muslim extremist groups might see Bush as an attractive vessel to "bring it on" when it comes to this fantasical apocalyptic clash between Islam and the West.
Posted by: jHc at October 28, 2004 07:52 PM (Cg5fz)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
EMPATHY
Slate is overwhelmingly supporting Kerry, but one writer conducted
an experiment in empathy: he donned both Kerry/Edwards and Bush/Cheney gear and headed to where he'd find the most dissent. The result? Gee, what do you think?
Posted by: Sarah at
06:01 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 38 words, total size 1 kb.
1
What happened when abc producers went to the rallies wearing the opposing teams' t-shirts.
http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/Vote2004/story?id=214695&page=1
:p
Posted by: Sen at November 01, 2004 09:47 PM (UGEqL)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
October 26, 2004
WHEW
Dear Blue 6,
You and I can both rest easy now: they finally got your absentee ballot today. Thank goodness I don't have to lie to you, which I was planning on doing if they didn't receive it! It's there and you're taken care of.
See you soon,
Sarah
Posted by: Sarah at
05:07 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 51 words, total size 1 kb.
PIPA
I knew there was something rotten in Denmark about that
"separate realities" PIPA poll. I really liked the title, and I certainly agree that hardcore Bush and Kerry supporters live in separate realities. But once I started reading the report, I realized that the different realities broke down into Bush = deluded Kerry = right. Sigh. Whenever the report pointed out how dumb Bush supporters are for believing something, I found myself thinking that, depending on how it was worded, I would've answered the same thing. And that's the crux of the report:
depending on how it's worded. Joe Carter leads a
discussion of adjectives and Xlrq addresses the
misleading questions in the poll. I firmly believe we live in separate realities, but this report did absolutely nothing to illuminate these differences.
Posted by: Sarah at
02:30 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 134 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I think i can shed some light on the two realities. There are those of us that "know" our government lies to us, and that it is a matter of time before we catch those lies. Then there are those that want to believe the government, and are hurt and shocked when they find out the government lied to them.
Much of this is predicated on ones age I suppose, if you lived through the "Gulf of Tonkin" and Watergate series of lies you have no faith that anyone in government will tell the truth. If you were born post 1973, you are likely a "believer"
Posted by: Bubba Bo Bob Brain at October 26, 2004 10:21 PM (n7PkD)
2
But I know plenty of people my age or younger who are convinced that the government is lying. Is that really an age distinction or just an ideology one?
Posted by: Sarah at October 27, 2004 02:29 AM (grW7N)
3
Well if your under thirty, it is probably ideology. For me it is an accumulation of things I have witnessed, things like the Gulf of Tonkin, Watergate, and the lies the Air Force tell a widow when her husband is killed as a result of a helocopter accident. I might be a cynic, but I am comfortable knowing I am writing in for president: "Mays Gilliam" a fictional character for a ficticious time. I wonder how long you will be able to hold out and not become a cynic.
Posted by: Bubba Bo Bob Brain at October 28, 2004 09:03 PM (n7PkD)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
October 23, 2004
LIES
Here's another story about my brother. Back in the day, he had a little 8th grade girlfriend who was new to town. She said her father was a doctor and that they were building a new home, and she and my brother would ride their bikes by the construction site. She said she was a catalog model and had made lots of money doing photo shoots. And none of it was true. She lived in a small house with just her mom and had never been a model. My brother was pretty freaked out when the truth came out.
I've never forgotten this girl; I think of her often when I wonder about people who lie. I wonder what made her say these things. We all tell white lies to avoid hurting people's feelings, and we may exaggerate the truth a bit to make a story more fantastic, but repeated fabrication and lies and shifting the blame is cause for concern. Did this little girlfriend get so wrapped up in the fantasy world that she didn't know she was a liar, or was she just trying so hard to get people to like her that she'd say whatever she thought they'd like to hear? Either way is frightening.
John Kerry, as far as anyone can tell, hasn't fired a shotgun at a bird in many years, if ever. While it is possible that he might nevertheless luck out and hit a goose, the odds are heavily against it. Yet there is something about Kerry that requires him to distort reality to fit his own conception of himself: he ran in the Boston marathon; he never falls down while snowboarding unless a Secret Service agent knocks him over; he can't stand to walk across a patch of tarmac without pulling out a football; when he threw out the first pitch at Fenway Park and it landed half-way to home plate, it was the fault of the National Guardsman who was supposed to catch it, because the Guardsman was nervous; he had the biggest buck in the history of Massachusetts in his sights but didn't pull the trigger. And now, he shot a goose. Only, where is it?
This would be an alarming personality trait even if Kerry's fantasies were limited to sporting triumphs. But the Walter Mitty candidate doesn't stop there. When a candidate for President makes up non-existent secret missions to Cambodia, testifies before Congress of "war crimes" of which, it turns out, he has no knowledge, and fantasizes support from foreign powers which will magically change their perceptions of their own self-interest if only John F. Kerry were President, Walter Mitty is no longer funny.
Posted by: Sarah at
04:24 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 448 words, total size 3 kb.
1
I think a psychologist would diagnose those symptoms as indicators of an inferiority complex or insecurity.
Posted by: Mike at October 24, 2004 04:47 PM (ckYKs)
2
I think I'm understanding how it works now.
If Bush says something wild or astonishing, it's safe to assume it's true unless 100% proven otherwise.
But if John Kerry says something even private or trivial that can't be 100% proven, it's presumed a lie.
It's not that you guys make things up; it's that you don't register as 'evidence' anything that you don't agree with.
Say, ban and delete me, wouldja? Thanks.
Posted by: auto_movil at October 25, 2004 06:06 PM (2sTXp)
3
The hunting snafu is bizarre. Powerline claims that they've never known Kerry to hunt? It'd qualify the writers as stalkers if they did. The real battle is over the mythology of hunting geese, and not hunting geese. It's not whether he's a hunter it's whether he's a "man", in the red state sense of the term.
This battle over mythology is, of course, one of the key battles in any given elections, since the citizenry is largely too stupid or too lazy to be bothered with policy, so I suppose I don't begrudge bloggers the mythology in their memes, but still: Kerry is patrician, and patricians hunt. I'd bet dollars to donuts that he's done more than his fair share of hunting. Certainly more than me when I was growing up in rural OH.
Posted by: jpe at October 25, 2004 08:55 PM (w4ohZ)
4
I read the Kerry article in Field and Stream. A 16 point buck got away....
Any real hunter knows that's crap. If you can't hit a buck that has 16 points, you can't hit the broad side of a barn.
It's just another example of how Kerry couldn't tell the truth if his life depended on it. Unfortunately, if he wins, our lives possibly will and THAT is the scary part folks...
Posted by: Army wife at October 30, 2004 04:50 PM (/1PdN)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
October 22, 2004
PHONY
Once again, where's the character from Family Guy? "John Kerry is a
great big phony!"
Posted by: Sarah at
01:42 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 17 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I honestly laugh everytime I see him in a Carhartt jacket, of course he only does that in rural states.
Yeah Bubba, you just came in from mucking stalls...
Sheesh
Posted by: Tink at October 22, 2004 03:06 AM (S6VXg)
2
He looks so stupid. I've probably killed more birds than him....and I've only been hunting twice! What a fake...
Posted by: Erin at October 22, 2004 05:45 PM (AgmLR)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
October 19, 2004
FEAR
I'm still upset from
earlier today. I tried to read about the laser beam and refocus, but I just couldn't do it. Part of the reason is because I'm worried about our country's laser beam.
I haven't allowed myself to get confident about the election. In fact, I'm pretty freaking scared. I don't care about what the polls say; I'm freaked out about what happens on 2 November. I keep thinking about what Whittle said:
I fear the consequences of abandoning personal responsibility. I fear the self-hatred and nihilism that grows among the pampered, the narcissistic and the uninformed. These are things to be feared greatly. They have brought down entire civilizations and led to dark ages that have cost this species very dearly. I think we stand at such a point today, and this election -- win or lose -- will not determine the outcome...although it might give us some indication of how sick or healthy we are at this pivotal moment in history.
I fear that my blog-reading has insulated me from just how sick our country is right now. I surround myself with informed people who understand that we're in a post-9/11 world, so I was completely taken aback when someone spouted DU-esque nonsense about how the war in Iraq is a distraction (oh wait, that's not just from the DU; the Democrat candidate says the same thing.) And I'm afraid that there are a lot more like that out there.
And I have seen the eternal Idiotarian hold my coat, and snicker,
And in short, I was afraid.
We need to win this election. I know our country has survived worse, but we are at a crossroads and we need to take the right path. I'm not confident at all that we will. I hope I'm wrong.
Posted by: Sarah at
04:00 PM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 303 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Now how many people paraphrase Prufrock in a blog? Not many, I tell you.
Posted by: CavalierX at October 19, 2004 10:26 PM (sA6XT)
2
I too am very concerned, Sarah. I attend a typical Southern Baptist church in southwest Missouri, and interacting with some local college students who attend church there also, I am most distressed: Several expressed apathy over who ought to be our C-in-C; many STILL hadn't registered! (And of course, it's too late now.)
Another point: I, like most evangelicals, believe in the resurrection of the dead; indeed, I predict that the biblical "rapture" will occur on November 2--at least in Saint Louis, MO. (as it always does on election day). Seems the dead, they rise every time we here in Missouri hold an election--and (as you remember, being registered here in MO yourself), we have even voted a deceased man to the Senate!
THAT is what I really fear--dead people voting, dogs voting, cats voting, fictitious people voting, illegal aliens voting. As Peggy Noonan just voiced on Hannity & Colmes, that kind of fraud is treasonous.
If Kerry wins fair and square (he doesn't even have to win the popular--the electoral vote will suffice), so be it; we will have gotten the president we deserve. But if all those fraudulent means above sway the vote, then I weep for this, our nation.
Posted by: Jim Shawley at October 19, 2004 11:15 PM (wyxEQ)
3
Like you,I fear for our country when I see and hear some of the things that supposedly intelligent people spout. But there is hope. My mother, a southern yellow dog Democrat, has been seriously studying many issues and it looks like she has decided that Bush will be better for the country. Maybe there are more like her. That's one of the things I pray for. I also pray for our country, our leaders, our troops, and you and your husband. God Bless.
Posted by: Pamela at October 20, 2004 01:13 PM (AOFgp)
4
P.S.
I've been reading your blog for several weeks. I found it through a link from another blog (I think it started with Michelle Malkins blog). I have really enjoyed reading here. I sympathize with your tilt to the right and your lose of friends because of it. I have friends and family I can not even have a conversation with anymore (sigh). As for your blog reading insulating you from the sickies out there; start with Moveon.org and follow some of thier links. Yikes, will that ever bring you up to speed on the raving moonbats:-) Keep up the good work!
Posted by: Pamela at October 20, 2004 01:22 PM (AOFgp)
5
Hang in there. Lincoln was convinced he would lose in 1864. It will be close, But Bush will prevail.
Posted by: Tanker Schreiber at October 20, 2004 03:21 PM (X3jxj)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
October 18, 2004
SURGE
I've heard people scoff at the idea that the terrorists want Kerry to win. Well, here's
interesting take on some people who have been listening to Kerry. (Thanks, Hud.)
Posted by: Sarah at
01:55 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 31 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Ugg ...that's just terrible .
Anyways I'm still following Lt. D I don't know why it is some people just don't leave your mind even tho you've never met them. I'm glad to hear he's doing better . I read a couple news articles on him tonight( This am actually ) there were a few pictures .. He looks like such a wonderful guy . I keep thinking about the power of prayer and will to survive .
I just wanted to let you know I'm still thinking about him and you . God Bless
Posted by: MorningSun at October 18, 2004 05:48 AM (EPBbn)
2
Thanks. I tried to call him recently on his birthday, but I couldn't get through. I need to try again...
Posted by: Sarah at October 18, 2004 06:51 AM (ECh5c)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
October 14, 2004
PEACE OF MIND
Paranoid as I am, I called to see if our absentee ballots have made it to Missouri. Mine is there safe and sound; the husband's is not there yet, but it has further to travel. I'll call back next week for another update.
Posted by: Sarah at
04:43 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 49 words, total size 1 kb.
COMMON MAN
I'd give anything to go to a
Wal-Mart.
Posted by: Sarah at
08:26 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 12 words, total size 1 kb.
October 11, 2004
NUISANCE
A nuisance? A
nuisance?
Terrorism is a nuisance?
How could anyone in this country vote for this man?
Posted by: Sarah at
05:46 AM
| Comments (12)
| Add Comment
Post contains 20 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Right. Much smarter to vote for someone who will delay the war to win votes.
From the LA Times:
"The Bush administration will delay major assaults on rebel-held cities in Iraq until after U.S. elections in November, say administration officials, mindful that large-scale military offensives could affect the U.S. presidential race."
Not to mention wanting to reduce terrorism to the level of a nuisance is not the same thing as saying terrorism is a nuisance.
But make yourself happy.
Posted by: delagar at October 11, 2004 02:49 PM (OGs7b)
2
That's a pretty nice spin attempt from the LA Times, considering that a) we just took Samarra, b) we just negotiated a cease-fire with al-Sadr, and c) six months ago, the Bush Administration ws saying that they're going to make a final anti-terrorist sweep in November and December. LA just got the news, eh?
Posted by: CavalierX at October 11, 2004 03:40 PM (sA6XT)
3
I love to pass my cursor over the highlighted names of the snide, rude posters you seem to attract. Ever noticed how most of their e0mail addresses end with ".edu"? Hmm. Makes me thank the lord that I got out safely after a Bachelor's and Juris Doctor Degree with my brain still fully hydrated. Clearly, that educational environment causes some type of short circuit within the cortex. I'll let you know if I see you exhibiting any signs of lofty moonbattiness. Oh, and Happy birthday!
Posted by: Oda Mae at October 11, 2004 05:11 PM (JxQWH)
4
I love to pass my cursor over the highlighted names of the snide, rude posters you seem to attract. Ever noticed how most of their e-mail addresses end with ".edu"? Hmm. Makes me thank the lord that I got out safely after a Bachelor's and Juris Doctor Degree with my brain still fully hydrated. Clearly, that educational environment causes some type of short circuit within the cortex. I'll let you know if I see you exhibiting any signs of lofty moonbattiness. Oh, and Happy Birthday!
Posted by: Oda Mae at October 11, 2004 05:18 PM (JxQWH)
5
Sarah - I don't know the answer to your question but 76% of our troops will be voting for BUSH. So that tells you something right there.
Posted by: Kathleen A at October 11, 2004 07:40 PM (vnAYT)
6
I saw that the quote came from the LA Times and just skipped to the next comment.
Yeah, I read it earlier today. I just consider the source.
As for Your question Sarah - I don't understand. But the sad thing is neither "side" is capable of seeing why the other feels so strongly. It's an election like no other I've ever seen.
Posted by: Tammi at October 11, 2004 08:49 PM (UOdfZ)
7
There are many people who resist facing unpleasant realities...Kerry's downplaying of the problem appeals to these individuals precisely because it allows them to keep the covers over their heads for a little bit longer.
Posted by: David Foster at October 12, 2004 12:31 PM (XUtCY)
8
Make up your minds will you!
"Can we win the war on terrorism? Yes, I think we can, in the sense that we can win the war on organized crime. There is going to be no peace treaty on the battleship Missouri in the war on terrorism, but we can break its back so that it is only a horrible
nuisance and not a paralyzing influence on our societies."
-- General Brent Scowcroft
Bush 41 National Security Advisor
Bush 43 appointee to the Forum for International Security
"9/11 a Year On" conference, Sept. 2002
http://www.usip.org/events/2002/america/scowcroft.html
Posted by: curveball at October 12, 2004 03:49 PM (XgPtC)
9
"In a word, I want an American character, that the powers of Europe may be convinced we act for ourselves and not for others; this, in my judgment, is the only way to be respected abroad and happy at home." --George Washington
Posted by: Moor at October 12, 2004 03:57 PM (g8OfD)
10
http://www.wordiq.com/definition/Forbes_family
Posted by: Moor at October 12, 2004 06:18 PM (g8OfD)
11
Moor, I know it is hard for you...But do try to stay on topic and relevant to this century.
Your buddy Brent is living in what you like to call the September 12th world, unlike George Washington.
As far as the Forbes thing...I have no clue what you are trying to accomplish with that. But thanks for playing.
Posted by: curveball at October 12, 2004 10:15 PM (PGrwU)
12
Hello folks nice blog youre running
Posted by: lolita at January 19, 2005 09:48 PM (yM4u5)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
118kb generated in CPU 0.0417, elapsed 0.1489 seconds.
61 queries taking 0.1216 seconds, 266 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.