July 25, 2005


I agree with Lileks that this is just absurd. The flip-flops were too informal, but John Roberts' family was too formal? What on earth does that mean? Their children looked nice, for pete's sake. My brothers and I used to wear stuff like that regularly when occasion called for it, like church or family photos. I darn sure think my mom would've made us dress up when we went to be on TV at the White House! And the caption under the photo is just plain snarky: "Even the clothes are conservative". What could the children have worn to make them look less right-wing, tie-dye and peace signs? Give me, and the Roberts family, a freaking break.

Posted by: Sarah at 08:29 AM | Comments (8) | Add Comment
Post contains 119 words, total size 1 kb.

July 21, 2005


You know what really bugs me? The media bends over backwards to recognize knighthood, but they constantly belittle our president. They make sure to always say Sir Paul McCartney, but I can't even count the times I've heard the media refer to our president as "Bush". His name is President Bush, you clods.

Posted by: Sarah at 05:40 PM | Comments (13) | Add Comment
Post contains 55 words, total size 1 kb.

July 02, 2005


Stars and Stripes issues a forthright retraction of incorrect data. The mainstream media should take notice of what a real retraction looks like. Stars and Stripes looks classier every day.

Posted by: Sarah at 01:43 AM | Comments (1) | Add Comment
Post contains 32 words, total size 1 kb.

<< Page 1 of 1 >>
52kb generated in CPU 0.0414, elapsed 0.1251 seconds.
49 queries taking 0.0988 seconds, 159 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.